Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moderat
Moderat
Abstract
Indonesia has great potential to become a significant player in halal products. However, the
Indonesian halal industry still faces challenges, particularly in enticing Muslim consumers.
So, the Indonesian halal sector must adapt to the buying behaviour of Muslim consumers,
considering that the factors affecting it are still unknown. Moreover, there is still a lack of
studies on the moderating role of halal awareness in Muslim consumer buying behaviour.
Therefore, this study aims to determine the position of halal awareness in the relationship
between purchase intentions and personal norms on the buying behaviour of Muslim
consumers in Indonesia. This study uses a quantitative approach with a causal design. The
research population is Muslim consumers in PASIGALA (Palu, Sigi, and Donggala). A closed
questionnaire was used to collect data from 390 respondents. The analysis method used the
Partial Least Square Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS program version
3.2.9. The results showed that purchase intention, personal norms, and halal awareness
positively affected Muslim buying behaviour. In addition, this study also indicated that halal
awareness has a role in moderating the relationship between purchase intention and Muslim
buying behaviour in Indonesia and the negative relationship between personal norms and
Muslim buying behaviour.
Keywords: Halal Awareness, Purchase Intention, Personal Norms, Muslim Buying Behavior
247
Sofyan Bachmid and Noval
INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE REVIEW
Muslim Purchase Intention and Purchase Behavior
Podnar, & Zabkar, 2019; Zhao, Zhang, & Wang, 2019). Therefore, personal norms
can be considered an important predictor of consumer behavior.
RESEARCH METHODS
This study uses a quantitative approach with an explanatory design that aims
to provide new evidence and an explanation of the correlation between purchase
intention and Muslim buying behavior with a moderation of halal awareness. The
ideological concept of this research is based on the theory of planned behavior.
Data collection using a closed questionnaire. The population is Muslim consumers
in PASIGALA (Palu, Sigi, and Donggala), whose number is unknown. So that the
determination of the number of samples will use the Lemeshow formula (Suryani,
2016, hal. 194), with an error rate of 5% and a proportion of 50%; the number of
samples required is 390. Data collection uses purposive sampling with two criteria.
First, it is a Muslim, and the second is domiciled in either of the PASIGALA areas. The
use of this method aims to obtain data in accordance with the research objectives.
This study uses four constructs: halal awareness, purchase intention, personal
norms, and Muslim buying behavior. Each construct has adopted a measurement scale
from the previous literature (Table 1). The halal awareness construct measurement
scale adapts from Awan, Siddiquei, & Haider (2015b) with eight statement items.
The purchase intention construct adopts a measurement scale from Bashir (2019)
and Garg & Joshi (2018b) with five statement items. The personal norm construct
embraces the measurement scale from Khare (2015) and Tuhin et al. (2020)
with four statement items. The construct of Muslim buying behavior adopts the
measurement scale of Kim & Seock (2019) and Nasution & Rossanty (2018) with
six statement items. The statement items were then scored using a five-point Likert
scale ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree.”
Table 1
Construct Measurement
Data analysis method using Partial Least Square Structural Equation Model
(PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS version 3.2.9 program. Because with this method, it
is possible to estimate complex causal relationships in the path model with the
construct (Sarstedt, Hair, Nitzl, Ringle, & Howard, 2020). The analysis in the PLS-SEM
model can be divided into two stages, namely the outer model and the inner model (J.
Hair & Alamer, 2022). Exterior model analysis was carried out through confirmatory
analysis through convergent validity test, discriminant validity test, and construct
reliability test. Convergent validity test using outer loading and Average Variance
Extracted (AVE) with the outer loading limit value of each indicator must be in
the region of 0.70, and the AVE value must be at 0.50 or more that each indicator
can be said to be convergently valid. (J. Hair & Alamer, 2022). Pengujian validitas
diskriminan mengunakan Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) The discriminant
validity test uses the Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) with the HTMT limit value
having a value less than 0.85 or 0.90 (J. Hair & Alamer, 2022). For construction, the
reliability test will use Cronbach’s alpha (α) and Composite Reliability (CR) with a
limit value of 0.70 (Joseph F Hair, Hult, Ringle, Sarstedt, & Thiele, 2017).
The inner model analysis was carried out with five criteria, namely statistical
collinearity test, evaluation of effect size (F2) and the significance of path analysis,
coefficient of determination test (R2), predictive relevance test (Q2), and Goodness
of Fit test (Akter, D’Ambra, & Ray, 2011; Joseph F. Hair & Sarstedt, 2019). The
collinearity statistical test will use the Variant Inflation Factor (VIF) value with a
limit value of less than 5. The effect size test uses a limit value of f2=0.02 (weak),
f2=0.15 (medium), and f2=0.35 (large). Thus the value of f2 =<0.02 can be ignored or
considered no effect (J F Hair, Sarstedt, Ringle, & Gudergan, 2017). The path analysis
value ranges from -1 to +1; the closer the value to the number -1 or +1, the stronger
the construct with a significance < 0.05. The coefficient of determination test (R2)
will use the value of R2. The value of R2= 0.67 (strong), R2=0.50 (moderate), and
R2=0.25 (weak) (Chin, 1998; J F Hair et al., 2017). The predictive relevance test (Q2)
will use the value of Q2 with the criteria if the value > 0 indicates that the model
has a relevant predictive value (Chin, 1998). The Goodness of Fit (GoF) test uses the
GoF index with criteria if the GoF index value is 0.1 (weak), 0.25 (medium), and 0.36
(large). A high GoF value indicates a high-quality research model (Akter et al., 2011).
Results
followed by a Master’s (21%), High School (21%), Diploma (15%), Doctoral (4%),
and Elementary School (1%). Of all the occupations, the majority of respondents
work as civil servants (28%), followed by students (20%), self-employed (19%),
private employees (14%), other occupations (14%), and TNI/Polri (5%).
Table 2
Demographic Profile
Gender
Male 188 48
Female 202 52
Education Level
Elementary School 2 1
Junior High School 0 0
Senior High School 83 21
Diploma 59 15
Bachelor’s Degree (S1) 149 38
Master (S2) 81 21
Doctoral (S3) 16 4
Occupation
Government Employees 111 28
Domicile
Kota Palu 140 36
Donggala 130 33
Sigi 120 31
Table 3
Output Convergent Validity and Construct Reliability
Average
Outer Cronbach’s Composite
Constructs Item Variance
Loading alpha Reliability
Extracted
HA1 0.790
HA2 0.791
HA3 0.776
HA4 0.755
Halal Awareness 0.597 0.904 0.922
HA5 0.810
HA6 0.773
HA7 0.750
HA8 0.733
PI1 0.753
PI2 0.818
Purchase
PI3 0.776 0.601 0.834 0.883
Intention
PI4 0.790
PI5 0.734
PN1 0.858
PN2 0.802
Personal Norms 0.686 0.848 0.897
PN3 0.878
PN4 0.771
MBB1 0.824
MBB2 0.838
Muslim Buying MBB3 0.801
0.687 0.909 0.930
Behavior MBB4 0.852
MBB5 0.822
MBB6 0.837
Source: Output SmartPLS 3.0
Table 4
Discriminant Validity Output
Goodness of
Constructs VIF R2 F2 Q2
Fit
Muslim Buying Behavior 0.719 0.478 0.703
Halal Awareness 1.786 0.044
Purchase Intention 1.769 0.116
Personal Norms 1.487 0.236
Moderating Effect 1
0.245
(HA*PN)
Moderating Effect 1
0.121
(HA*PN)
Hypothesis Test
They tested the hypothesis of this study using the PLS-SEM bootstrap technique,
as shown in Figure 2 and Table 6. The test results show that Purchase Intention has a
significant and positive relationship with Muslim Buying Behavior (β 0.251; p 0.007).
Therefore, H1 is in support. Personal Norms have a significant positive relationship
with Muslim Buying Behavior (β 0.343; p 0.003). Thus, H2 is supported. Halal
awareness positively correlates significantly with Muslim Buying Behavior (β 0.167;
p 0.010). Therefore, H3 is supported. The test results of the moderating effect of
halal awareness in the relationship between Purchase Intention and Muslim Buying
Behavior show a significant and positive relationship (β 0.173; p 0.004). Therefore,
Table 6
Summary of Structural Model
Path P
Construct T Statistics
Coefficient Values
Table 7
Summary of the hypothesis
Discussion
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Ahmadova, E., & Aliyev, K. (2021). Determinants of attitudes towards Halal products:
Empirical evidence from Azerbaijan. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(1), 55–69.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2019-0068
Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2011). An evaluation of PLS based complex models:
The roles of power analysis, predictive relevance and GoF index. 17th Americas
Conference on Information Systems 2011, AMCIS 2011, 2, 1313–1319.
Ambali, A. R., & Bakar, A. N. (2014). People’s Awareness on Halal Foods and Products:
Potential Issues for Policy-makers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
121(September 2012), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1104
Awan, H. M., Siddiquei, A. N., & Haider, Z. (2015a). Factors affecting Halal purchase
intention – evidence from Pakistan’s Halal food sector. Management Research
Review, 38(6), 640–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2014-0022
Awan, H. M., Siddiquei, A. N., & Haider, Z. (2015b). Factors affecting Halal purchase
intention – evidence from Pakistan’s Halal food sector. Management Research
Review, 38(6), 640–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2014-0022
Aziz, Y. A., & Chok, N. V. (2013). The Role of Halal Awareness, Halal Certification,
and Marketing Components in Determining Halal Purchase Intention Among
Non-Muslims in Malaysia: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of
International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, 25(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10
.1080/08974438.2013.723997
Bashir, A. M. (2019). Effect of halal awareness, halal logo and attitude on foreign
consumers’ purchase intention. British Food Journal, 121(9), 1998–2015.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2019-0011
Effendi, I., Murad, M., Rafiki, A., & Lubis, M. M. (2021). The application of the theory
of reasoned action on services of Islamic rural banks in Indonesia. Journal of
Islamic Marketing, 12(5), 951–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2020-
0051
Garg, P., & Joshi, R. (2018a). Purchase intention of “Halal” brands in India: the
mediating effect of attitude. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(3), 683–694. https://
doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2017-0125
Garg, P., & Joshi, R. (2018b). Purchase intention of “Halal” brands in India: the
mediating effect of attitude. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(3), 683–694. https://
doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2017-0125
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-
SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied
example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.
org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Hair, J F, Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced Issues in Partial
Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications.
Hair, Joseph F., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for
Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method. Project Management
Journal, 50(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819882132
Hair, Joseph F, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror,
mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural
equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5),
616–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x
Hanum, F., & Adityawarman, A. (2020). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Beli Roti
Halal pada Mahasiswa Muslim. BISNIS : Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen Islam,
8(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v8i1.7046
Haque, A., Sarwar, A., Yasmin, F., Tarofder, A. K., & Hossain, M. A. (2015). Non-Muslim
consumers’ perception toward purchasing halal food products in Malaysia.
Journal of Islamic Marketing, 6(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-
2014-0033
Kim, S. H., & Seock, Y. K. (2019). The roles of values and social norm on personal
norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior:
The mediating role of personal norms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer
Services, 51(April), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.023
Koklic, M. K., Golob, U., Podnar, K., & Zabkar, V. (2019). The interplay of past
consumption, attitudes and personal norms in organic food buying. Appetite,
137(June 2018), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.010
Kotler, P., & Amstrong, G. (2014). Principles of Marketing (15 ed.). New Jersey: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Nitzl, C., Ringle, C. M., & Howard, M. C. (2020). Beyond a
tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses!
International Journal of Market Research, 62(3), 288–299. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1470785320915686
Suryani, H. (2016). Metode Riset Kuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi pada Penelitian Bidang
Manajemen dan Ekonomi Islam. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Tuhin, M. K. W., Miraz, M. H., Habib, M. M., & Alam, M. M. (2020). Strengthening
consumers’ halal buying behaviour: role of attitude, religiosity and personal
norm. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2020-
0220
Vizano, N. A., Khamaludin, K., & Fahlevi, M. (2021). The Effect of Halal Awareness on
Purchase Intention of Halal Food: A Case Study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian
Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.13106/
jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0441
Wahab, M. K., Miraz, M. H., Habib, M. M., & Alam, M. M. (2019). The Influence of
Personal Norms on Consumers’ Halal Purchase Behavior: Consumer Attitude
as a Mediator. 2nd International Conference on Business and Management (ICBM
2019), (May 2019), 345–350.
Zhao, C., Zhang, M., & Wang, W. (2019). Exploring the influence of severe haze pollution
on residents’ intention to purchase energy-saving appliances. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 212, 1536–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.134