Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Robotic Systems For Cleaning and Inspection of Large Concrete Pipes
Robotic Systems For Cleaning and Inspection of Large Concrete Pipes
Delta Centre-Ville
Montréal, Canada, October 5-7, 2010
in order to reach the goals of increased plant efficiency, lower system operates largely autonomously once the operator has
emissions and lower operating costs. Technologies tested for defined certain high-level goals such as the length of the
similar situations can be adapted and applied to the new section to be inspected, or the position where the cleaning
challenges at hand. should begin. Afterwards, the operator oversees the progress
of the cleaning and/or the inspection results.
III. STATE OF THE ART
A. Carrier system
Currently sewer pipes are inspected either manually, or
with a pipe crawler equipped with a video camera for a tv- The inspection and cleaning system has all-wheel drive to
quality inspection. Newer systems incorporate two axially- increase redundancy and to better overcome obstacles. The
oriented cameras with fisheye lenses to take images of the system weight, at approximately 2 tons, is very high in order
entire pipe. These camera images are then later stitched to give it sufficient stability and traction despite high flow
together using software to create a 360° panorama image of volumes and low friction coefficient between the wheels and
the pipe. Sometimes a combination of these cameras with a the pipe wall. The prototypical construction consisted of a
projected laser line, ring or other structure is used to obtain wheeled-chassis, upon which either the sensor unit or the
more information about the pipe’s geometry. Generally, pipe cleaning unit could be installed. This modular set-up proved
crawler systems are for smaller pipes with diameters under 1.2 helpful during the prototypical testing phase. Currently the
m. two modules for cleaning and inspection are being fused with
The goal of sewer pipe cleaning is to remove obstacles and each other and with the carrier module into one system.
sediments to allow for inspection and maintenance tasks. The
most economical and common cleaning method for sewer
pipes is high pressure cleaning. A skid with various nozzles is
attached to the end of a high pressure hose and the water
pressure is used both to clean and mobilize any sediments and
to ensure that the skid moves forward along the pipe. There
are a number of specialized cleaning systems on the market
that are especially limited in their cleaning quality and range
of use (not for large diameter pipes or for long pipe lengths)
due to their poor positioning and guidance characteristics.
Image 2 - Cleaning tool The camera system employs 9 cameras that overlap and
take high resolution images of the entire pipe surface above
The special construction of the telescopic arms ensures that water. In addition there are 7 light section sensors which use
the water pressure for cleaning is not affected by the laser lines for measuring joint widths and deviations in the
telescopic movements and that a fail-safe position can be position of the pipes relative to a neighboring pipe.
achieved by any type of system or power failure. The nozzle Sediments, obstacles and mechanical wear can be reliably
bank and ejector nozzle are both controlled to move at a detected with an ultrasonic pipe scanner. This information is
constant distance from the pipe wall during cleaning and important for the inspection and as a quality control measure
collision sensors ensure that the arms do not come in contact when cleaning the underwater area of the pipe.
with the pipe wall. The position of the entire system relative to the pipe is
measured and the information is used to help create an
accurate depiction of the pipe. The position is measured
redundantly with a number of different sensors, including the
light section sensors and an inclinometer. The use of accurate
positioning information is necessary to generate the high
resolution inspection results.
The patented infiltration sensor system makes use of the
temperature difference between infiltrating ground water and
the warmer wastewater. Due to the depth of the Emscher
sewer system, the pipe is in the area where ground water is
present. Therefore any leakage would manifest itself through
ground water entering the pipe. Infiltrating flows of as little as
0.1 l/s can be reliably detected with the sensor system. The
sensor system is guided over joints between adjoining pipes.
To ensure a good measurement, the sensor is guided with a
constant distance from the pipe wall with a kinematics similar
Image 3 - Cleaning tool in action to that of the cleaning tool.
pipe surface.
E. Control system and operator-interface
During the inspection, the operator is in the control station
in the truck. From there the operator can monitor the progress
of the inspection and/or cleaning task and the operator can
manually override the automatic system at all times. The
system operates largely autonomously and software modules
for automatically detecting damage guide the operator to areas
where possible damage has occurred. The operator then has
the task of verifying the damage.
The complexity and high accuracy of the sensor systems
presented a unique challenge in developing the software to
fuse and visually present the inspection results. Normally a
sewer inspection is either viewed live or recorded and view
later by a trained inspector. This delivers acceptable results
when looking for large damage in small diameter pipes.
However, when viewing pipes with a diameter of 2600 mm, it
becomes difficult for the operator to reliably detect cracks
with a width between 0.1 mm and 0.5 mm, as is necessary in
the case of the Emscher sewer system. New strategies for
processing and representing the inspection data have been
developed, including software modules for automatically
detecting damage.
V. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Cleaning tests were carried out with the cleaning system in
a real sewer in Bottrop, Germany, which has a diameter of 2.3
m. The following images demonstrate the cleaning results.
The goal of the surface cleaning was to remove any
biological matter to allow for an optical assessment of the pipe
surface. Features such as cracks and corrosion can then be
optically detected and automatically characterized. Parameters
such as the type of nozzle, the distance between cleaning tool
and pipe wall, the cleaning speed, the water pressure and
volume flow were all varied during the testing phase. As the
reader can imagine, a large number of tests were necessary to
fully understand the relationship each of the individual
variables have upon the final cleaning results. Furthermore,
other factors such as initial pipe condition played a large role Image 9 – Formation of stripes after cleaning
and needed to be compensated for during the tests.
Images 8 and 9 both show sub-optimal cleaning results for The cleaning results as shown in Image 10 were quite
differing reasons. In Image 8 the combination of high positive. The pressure at the nozzle was approximately 100
pressure, small distance to pipe wall and cleaning speed were bar and the distance between cleaning tool and the pipe wall
sufficient to remove the dark microbiological surface film was held constant at approximately 20 cm. Multiple passes
from the pipe wall. However the surface of the pipe was also were necessary to achieve the desired cleaning quality without
mildly damaged, as seen in the visible structure of the filling risk of damage to the pipe surface.
material.
6