Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING (KIA 3006)

- Chapter 1 : Shallow Foundation-


(Soil Bearing Capacity)

AP. Ir. Dr. Meldi bin Suhatril


Department of Civil Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya.

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Introduction
• Foundations are the lowest portion of a
structure which exists below the earth surface.

• Civil engineer have to analyse it properly,


provide satisfactory and economical support to
the structure.

• The foundation is very important structural


element because if it is deficient in design or
construction, the entire building is at risk.

• Leaning tower of Pisa, Italy is a classical example.

“Foundations are designed To transfer load of the structure


safely to the strata/soil layers on which it is resting”
2

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 1


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Foundation Design Criteria


Bearing Capacity : There must be no failure within the surrounding soil;
soil failure would jeopardize the integrity of the
foundation. (Stability against shear failure)

Settlement : The settlement must be within tolerable limits.

Types of Foundations
Foundations are of two types: shallow and deep foundations

Type of foundation depends on the nature of sub- soil strata and type of
superstructure. 3

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Shallow Foundations
A shallow foundation is generally placed within the soil at a depth less
than the width of the foundation.
Combined Footing

Df / B ≤ 1.0

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 2


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

General Shear Failure q

dense sand
stiff clay

• The soil on the both sides of the foundation bulges.


• The slip surface extends to the ground surface.
• Bearing capacity failure occurs.
• The footing undergoes a very large settlement.
• GSF is accompanied by low strain (<5%) in a soil with considerable φ
(φ>36) & large N (N>30) having high relative density (ID >70%).
• Footings in Dense sands (Dr > 67%) - general shear failure.

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Punching Shear Failure q

medium dense sand /


Soft clay

• Failure surface extend to the ground surface


• Slight bulging of soil around the footing is observed.
• LSF is accompanied by large strain (>10 to 20%) in a soil with
considerably by low φ (φ<28) and low N (N<5) having low relative
density (ID >20%).
• Footings in Loose to Medium dense (30%< Dr < 67%) - Local Shear
failure.

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 3


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples


Punching Shear Failure
q

loose sand
soft clay

• In the case of punching shear failure, foundations penetrate into the


soil without any bulging of the surface.
• Very large displacement
• Relative loose sands with relative density is less than 35%.
• Footings in Very Loose Sand (Dr < 30%) - punching shear failure.

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Mode of failure Model Tests by Vesic (1973)

emax = soil void ratio in


loosest condition

emin = soil void ratio in


densest condition

emax  e
Dr 
emax  emin

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 4


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory

• Terzaghi (1943) was the first to present a comprehensive theory for


the ultimate bearing capacity
• Footing base is rough
• General shear failure
• Weight of soil above the base of footing may be replaced by a uniform
surcharge.

10

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 5


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory

• Zone I – Wedge ABJ –Elastic Zone.


• Zone II – Wedges AJE and BJD
- Radial shear zones.
• Zone III – Wedges AEG and BDF.
- Rankine’s passive zone
• JD and JE are arcs of logarithmic spirals
• DF and EG are straight lines
11

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

• Let us imagine that AJ and BJ are two walls that are pushing the soil wedges
AJEG and BJDF, respectively, to cause passive failure.

• Pp should be inclined at an angle δ, wall friction, to the perpendicular drawn


to the wedge faces.

• In this case, δ = φ.

• As AJ and BJ are inclined at φ to horizontal, Pp should be vertical.

• Considering equilibrium of wedge ABJ, per unit length.

12

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 6


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

• Thus,

or

• The passive pressure (Pp) in the above equation is the sum of the
contribution of the weight of soil γ, cohesion c, and surcharge qu.

13

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

a) Contribution of soil Weight , γ

14

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 7


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

b) Contribution of Cohesion, c

15

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

c) Contribution of surcharge, qo

16

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 8


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

• Thus, we can write

where Kγ, Kc, and Kq are earth pressure coefficients that are functions of
the soil friction angle, φ.

• Combining both Equations, we obtain

17

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

18

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 9


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

19

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

GENERAL BEARING CAPACITY

Once the ultimate bearing capacity of a foundation is computed, it is necessary to


determine the allowable bearing capacity (qall

20

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 10


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Terzaghi’s Bearing capacity Factors

• In the case of local shear failure, we may assume that

c’ = (2/3) c and tan φ’ = (2/3) tanφ


• The bearing capacity factors Nc, Nq, and Nγ, may be read from table.

• There is no bearing capacity equation available to account for transition


from general shear failure to local shear failure i.e 28° ≤ φ ≤ 38°. Local
shear failure (φ < 28°) and General shear failure (φ > 38°).

• Peck et al. (1974) have given the curves for Nq, and Nγ which
automatically account for the mixed state of local and general shear
failure.

21

Bearing capacity Factors

Transition from local to


general shear failure in sand
22

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 11


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

GENERAL BEARING CAPACITY

• Several investigators refined the solution suggested by Terzaghi


including Meyerhof (1951),Mortenson (1953), and Balla (1962).

• Solutions suggest that bearing capacity factors Nc and Nq do not


change much. However, Nγ vary widely due to the assumption of the
wedge shape located directly below the footing.

• The Terzaghi bearing capacity equation has been modified for other
shapes of foundations by introducing the shape factors.

23

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

GENERAL BEARING CAPACITY


Meyerhof (1963) presented a general bearing capacity equation which
takes into account the shape and the inclination of load. The general
form of equation suggested by Meyerhof for bearing capacity is

c = unit cohesion
q’o = effective overburden pressure at base level of the foundation = γDf
γ’ = effective unit weight above base level of foundation
γ = effective unit weight of soil below foundation base
Df = depth of foundation
Sc, Sq, Sγ = shape factors
dc, dq, dγ = depth factors
ic, iq, iγ = load inclination factors
B = width of foundation
Nc, Nq, Nγ = bearing capacity factors 24

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 12


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

GENERAL BEARING CAPACITY


-Hansen (1970) extended the work of Meyerhof by including
two additional factors to take care of base tilt and foundations
on slopes.
-Vesic (1973) used the same form of equation suggested by
Hansen.
However the equations used by them for computing the
values of Nc, Nq and Nγ are,
Nq = e (πtanφ) Nφ
Nφ = tan2 (45⁰ + φ /2)
Nc = (Nq – 1) cot φ
Nγ = (Nq -1) tan (1.4 φ) – (Meyerhof)
Nγ = 1.5(Nq -1) tan φ – (Hansen)
Nγ = 2.0(Nq -1) tan φ – (Vesic) 25

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Shape factors

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 13


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Depth factors

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Load inclination factors

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 14


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Validity of the Bearing Capacity Equations


-There has been little experimental verification of any of the
methods except by using model footings.

-Terzaghi’s equation, being the first proposed, has been quite


popular with designers.

- Both Meyerhof and Hansen methods are widely used.

-The Vesic method has not been much used.

- It is good practice to use at least two methods and compare


the computed values of qult

- If the two values do not compare well, use a third method.

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

EXAMPLE 1
A strip footing of width 3m is founded at a depth of 2m below
ground surface in soil strata having unit cohesion c =
30 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 and angle of shearing resistance 𝜑 = 35°. The
water table is at a depth of 5m below ground level. The unit
weight of soil above water table is 17.25 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 .

Determine:
a) The ultimate bearing capacity of soil
b) The net ultimate bearing capacity and
c) The safe bearing capacity for a factor of safety of 3.
Use general shear failure criterion of Terzaghi

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 15


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

For 𝜑 = 35°, 𝑁 = 57.8, 𝑁 = 41.4, and 𝑁 = 42.4

From Terzaghi’s Eqn.

𝑞 = 𝑐𝑁 + 𝛾𝐷 𝑁 + 0.5 𝛾𝐵𝑁

= 30 ∗ 57.8 + 17.25 ∗ 2 ∗ 41.4 + (0.5 ∗ 17.25 ∗ 3 ∗ 42.4)

= 4259 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑞 =𝑞 − 𝛾𝐷
= 4259 − 17.25 ∗ 2
≈ 4225 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑞 =𝑞 + 𝛾𝐷
𝑞 = 𝑞 /𝐹
= 1408 + 17.25 ∗ 2
= 4225/3
≈ 1408 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 ≈ 1443 𝑘𝑁/𝑚

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

EXAMPLE 2
If the soil in example 1 fails by local shear failure criteria,
determine the net safe earing capacity. All other data given
example 1 remain the same
SOLUTION :
For local shear failure:
𝜑 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛 0.67 tan 35° = 25°,
𝑐 = 0.67𝑐 = 0.67 ∗ 30
= 20 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
From the table, for 𝜑 = 25°,
𝑁 = 25.1, 𝑁 = 12.7, and 𝑁 = 9.7

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 16


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

From Terzaghi’s Eqn.,


𝑞 = 20 ∗ 25.1 + 17.25 ∗ 2 ∗ 12.7 + 0.5 ∗ 17.25 ∗ 3 ∗ 9.7
= 1191.0 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑞 = 𝑞 − 𝛾𝐷
= 1191 − 17.25 ∗ 2
= 1156.5 𝑘𝑁/𝑚

𝑞 = 𝑞 /𝐹
= 1156.5/3
= 385.5 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑞 = 𝑞 + 𝛾𝐷
= 385.5 + 17.25 ∗ 2
= 420.0 𝑘𝑁/𝑚

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Example 3

34

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 17


SEM 2 SESSION 2023/2024 3/5/2024

Introduction I Mode of Failures I Terzaghi BC I Others BC I Examples

Example 4

35

ASSOC PROF. IR. DR. MELDI BIN SUHATRIL 18

You might also like