TARGETED READING

Analyzing the political events of Honduras since the 1950s through the lens of Machiavelli's principles from
"The Prince" offers insights into the dynamics of power, leadership, and governance in the country. Over this
period, Honduras experienced numerous upheavals, transitions, and challenges, reflecting Machiavelli's
observations on human nature and the strategies employed by rulers to maintain control.
Since the 1950s, Honduras has seen a series of political leaders grappling with Machiavellian principles in their
governance:
Leadership and Loyalty: Various leaders in Honduras have navigated the complexities of loyalty and betrayal
among their subjects. Machiavelli's emphasis on the fickle nature of human allegiance resonates with instances
where leaders have faced shifts in public support based on perceived treatment and outcomes.
Use of Force and Cruelty: Machiavelli's advice on the judicious use of force and the avoidance of excessive
clemency finds parallels in Honduran politics, where rulers have sometimes resorted to authoritarian measures
to maintain order and control. Instances of political repression and the use of coercion to quell dissent reflect
this dynamic.
Fear and Love: Machiavelli's assertion that it is safer for a prince to be feared than loved underscores the
pragmatic considerations of leadership. In Honduras, leaders have often sought to strike a balance between
instilling fear to deter dissent and cultivating goodwill to foster loyalty among the populace.
Avoiding Hatred: Machiavelli's warning about the perils of being hated resonates with leaders in Honduras
who have sought to avoid public backlash and maintain stability. Strategies aimed at preserving public goodwill
and avoiding actions that provoke resentment align with this principle.
Versatility and Simulation: Machiavelli's advice on the need for rulers to be both lions and foxes underscores
the importance of adaptability and strategic thinking in governance. Honduran leaders have grappled with the
need to navigate complex political landscapes and anticipate challenges, often employing tactics of simulation
and disguise to maintain control.
Promises and Integrity: Machiavelli's counsel on the pragmatic considerations of promises and integrity
reflects the challenges faced by leaders in Honduras. Instances where leaders have reneged on commitments or
prioritized self-preservation over moral obligations underscore the tensions between political expediency and
ethical conduct.
Rewarding Talent and Shunning Flatterers: Machiavelli's emphasis on the importance of rewarding talent
and surrounding oneself with judicious advisors resonates with efforts by leaders in Honduras to cultivate
competent governance structures while avoiding the pitfalls of sycophancy and nepotism.
Fortune and Virtue: Machiavelli's reflections on the interplay between fortune and virtue find echoes in
Honduras, where leaders have grappled with the unpredictable nature of political dynamics and the importance
of cultivating institutional resilience and strategic foresight.
Through these lenses, the political history of Honduras since the 1950s reveals a complex interplay of
Machiavellian principles, as leaders have grappled with the challenges of governance, power dynamics, and the
pursuit of stability and prosperity in a tumultuous political landscape.
LET'S DELVE INTO SOME SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF HOW MACHIAVELLIAN PRINCIPLES
HAVE MANIFESTED IN THE POLITICAL EVENTS OF HONDURAS SINCE THE 1950S:
Leadership and Loyalty:
Example: During the rule of General Oswaldo López Arellano in the 1960s and 1970s, the regime maintained
control through a combination of patronage, coercion, and repression. Loyalty was often secured through a
mixture of rewards for supporters and harsh punishment for dissenters, reflecting Machiavelli's observation on
the fluctuating nature of human allegiance.
Use of Force and Cruelty:
Example: The military coup d'état in 2009 that ousted President Manuel Zelaya demonstrated the willingness
of Honduras' political elite to resort to force to protect their interests and maintain control. The subsequent
crackdown on dissenters and human rights abuses underscored the Machiavellian principle of using cruelty
strategically to quell opposition and preserve authority.
Fear and Love:
Example: Throughout various administrations, including that of Juan Orlando Hernández, leaders in Honduras
have sought to balance instilling fear to deter dissent with cultivating popular support through social programs
and public relations campaigns. The emphasis on projecting strength and authority reflects Machiavelli's advice
on the pragmatic considerations of leadership.
Avoiding Hatred:
Example: The administration of José Manuel Zelaya faced backlash from certain segments of society due to his
perceived leftist policies and attempts to amend the constitution. His eventual ousting in the 2009 coup
highlights the dangers of provoking resentment and the Machiavellian imperative of avoiding actions that lead
to hatred and backlash.
Versatility and Simulation:
Example: Political leaders in Honduras have often demonstrated adaptability and strategic thinking in response
to changing circumstances. For instance, during the Cold War era, various administrations shifted alliances and
policies to align with prevailing geopolitical currents, showcasing a Machiavellian approach to navigating
complex political landscapes.
Promises and Integrity:
Example: The failure of numerous Honduran leaders to fulfill campaign promises or uphold democratic
principles underscores the pragmatic considerations of promises and integrity. Instances of corruption and
backtracking on commitments reflect the Machiavellian tension between political expediency and ethical
conduct.
Rewarding Talent and Shunning Flatterers:
Example: Effective governance in Honduras has often hinged on the ability of leaders to surround themselves
with competent advisors and reward talent within the government. Leaders who have shunned flatterers and
cultivated a team of judicious advisors have been better equipped to navigate the complexities of governance.
Fortune and Virtue:
Example: The political fortunes of leaders in Honduras have often been subject to unpredictable external
factors, such as economic crises, natural disasters, and international pressures. Leaders who have exhibited
strategic foresight and institutional resilience have been better positioned to weather these challenges,
underscoring the Machiavellian imperative of balancing fortune and virtue in governance.
From the administration of Oswaldo López Arellano to that of Juan Orlando Hernández, Honduras has
experienced a variety of forms of government, ranging from military dictatorships to representative
democracies. Here is a detailed analysis of the form of government of each president during this period:
FORMS OF GOVERNMENT SINCE 1950 IN HONDURAS
Oswaldo López Arellano (1963-1971, 1972-1975):
López Arellano came to power through a coup in 1963 and was later democratically elected in 1971. During his
tenure, Honduras was under an authoritarian form of government, with López Arellano exerting significant
control over the country. It was characterized by nationalist economic policies and repression of political
opposition. However, his government was marked by corruption and authoritarianism.
Ramón Ernesto Cruz (1971-1972):
Cruz assumed the presidency of Honduras after López Arellano's resignation in 1971. During his brief tenure,
Cruz attempted to implement political and economic reforms but faced internal resistance and pressures. His
government was marked by political instability and a lack of consensus around his leadership.
Juan Alberto Melgar Castro (1975-1978):
Melgar Castro assumed the presidency after a coup against López Arellano in 1975. During his tenure,
Honduras continued under an authoritarian regime, with Melgar Castro consolidating his power through
repressive measures and economic management focused on industrialization. However, his government faced
criticism for human rights violations and corruption.
General Policarpo Paz García (1980-1982):
Paz García came to power after a coup in 1980. His government marked the beginning of a transition to
democracy in Honduras. Paz García implemented political and economic reforms aimed at liberalizing the
economy and promoting political openness. However, his government faced criticism for human rights
violations and corruption.
Roberto Suazo Córdova (1982-1986):
Suazo Córdova assumed the presidency after winning the 1981 elections, considered the first democratic
elections in decades in Honduras. His government was characterized by efforts to consolidate democracy and
promote economic development. However, he faced criticism for corruption and economic problems.
José Azcona del Hoyo (1986-1990):
Azcona del Hoyo succeeded Suazo Córdova as president and continued efforts to democratize and reform the
economy. His government faced challenges related to corruption, organized crime, and regional economic
crisis. Azcona del Hoyo promoted political openness and citizen participation, but his administration was
criticized for persistent corruption and lack of significant progress in economic and social development.
Rafael Leonardo Callejas (1990-1994):
Callejas assumed the presidency after winning the 1989 elections. During his tenure, he implemented economic
liberalization and privatization policies aimed at promoting economic growth and attracting foreign investment.
However, his government faced criticism for corruption and political repression. Callejas was also accused of
involvement in a corruption scandal related to FIFA bribes.
Carlos Roberto Reina (1994-1998):
Reina assumed the presidency after winning the 1993 elections. His government was marked by efforts to
strengthen democratic institutions and promote transparency and accountability. However, his administration
faced challenges related to corruption, organized crime, and poverty.
Carlos Roberto Flores Facussé (1998-2002):
Flores Facussé assumed the presidency after winning the 1997 elections. During his tenure, Honduras
experienced progress in areas such as economic stability and poverty reduction. Flores Facussé also promoted
modernization of the state and foreign investment promotion. However, his government faced criticism for
corruption and lack of significant progress in poverty and inequality reduction.
Ricardo Maduro Joest (2002-2006):
Maduro Joest assumed the presidency after winning the 2001 elections. During his tenure, he focused on
security policies and combating organized crime. Maduro Joest also promoted economic reforms aimed at
promoting growth and stability. However, his government faced criticism for human rights violations and lack
of progress in areas such as education and health.
Manuel Zelaya (2006-2009):
Zelaya assumed the presidency after winning the 2005 elections. During his tenure, he implemented progressive
policies, including increases in the minimum wage and social programs. However, his government faced
criticism and resistance from conservative and military sectors. Zelaya was ousted in a coup in 2009, marking a
break in Honduran democracy.
Porfirio Lobo Sosa (2010-2014):
Lobo Sosa assumed the presidency after winning the 2009 elections, which were questioned due to the context
of the 2009 coup. During his tenure, he sought to restore political stability and promote national reconciliation.
Lobo Sosa also implemented economic policies aimed at promoting growth and investment. However, his
government faced criticism for corruption and lack of significant progress in areas such as security and justice.
Juan Orlando Hernández (2014-2022):
Hernández assumed the presidency after winning the 2013 elections, which were controversial due to
allegations of electoral fraud. During his tenure, he focused on security policies and combating organized crime.
Hernández also implemented economic reforms aimed at promoting growth and investment. However, his
government faced criticism for human rights violations, corruption, and concentration of power.

Throughout these years, Honduras has experienced a variety of forms of government, reflecting the country's
political and social evolution. From authoritarian regimes to incipient democracies, Honduras' political history
has been marked by the struggle for power, stability, and development.
CHARACTERISTICS OF GOVERNMENT FORMS OF GOVERNMENT SINCE 1950´S IN
HONDURAS
Analysis of each Honduran government from the administration of Oswaldo López Arellano to that of Juan
Orlando Hernández, highlighting characteristics related to cruelty, vested interests, staying in power, power
struggles, and consideration of the population's interests:

 Oswaldo López Arellano (1963-1971, 1972-1975):

Characteristics:
Authoritarianism and repression: López Arellano ruled with an iron fist, suppressing political dissent and
repressing any form of opposition.
Vested interests: His regime was marked by corruption and personal enrichment of himself and his inner circle.
Maintenance in power: López Arellano used military control to stay in power, with several periods where he
self-proclaimed himself president.
Positive actions: Nationalist economic policies were implemented to protect the country's interests, although
these policies were also marked by corruption.

 Ramón Ernesto Cruz (1971-1972):

Characteristics:
Brief tenure: Cruz had a brief tenure marked by political instability and a lack of consensus around his
leadership.
Resistance to staying in power: Cruz faced internal and external opposition that hindered his attempts to
consolidate his government.
Positive actions: He attempted to implement political and economic reforms, although his short tenure limited
his ability to achieve significant changes.

 Juan Alberto Melgar Castro (1975-1978):

Characteristics:
Authoritarian regime: Melgar Castro maintained authoritarian control over the country, suppressing
opposition and limiting civil liberties.
Vested interests: His government was marked by corruption and personal enrichment of himself and his inner
circle.
Positive actions: He promoted industrialization policies aimed at diversifying the Honduran economy, although
these measures were also marked by corruption.

 General Policarpo Paz García (1980-1982):

Characteristics:
Transition to democracy: Paz García led the country during a period of transition to democracy, implementing
political and economic reforms.
Vested interests: Although his government was marked by corruption, Paz García sought to consolidate
democracy and promote national reconciliation.
Positive actions: He promoted political reforms aimed at liberalizing the economy and promoting political
openness.

 Roberto Suazo Córdova (1982-1986):

Characteristics:
Democratization: Suazo Córdova was elected in the first democratic elections in decades in Honduras,
marking a milestone in the country's political history.
Population's interests: His government committed to promoting political and economic reforms to improve the
population's living conditions.
Positive actions: He implemented policies aimed at consolidating democracy and promoting economic and
social development, although he faced criticism for corruption and economic problems.

 José Azcona del Hoyo (1986-1990):

Characteristics:
Democratic continuity: Azcona del Hoyo continued the democratization and economic reform efforts of his
predecessor, promoting political openness and citizen participation.
Population's interests: His government focused on improving the population's living conditions and combating
corruption.
Positive actions: He promoted state modernization, foreign investment promotion, and measures to strengthen
democratic institutions and transparency.

 Rafael Leonardo Callejas (1990-1994):

Characteristics:
Economic liberalization: Callejas implemented policies of economic liberalization and privatization to
promote growth and economic stability.
Vested interests: His government was marked by corruption and political scandals, including accusations of
FIFA bribes.
Positive actions: He promoted economic reforms aimed at promoting growth and investment, although his
legacy was tarnished by allegations of corruption.

 Carlos Roberto Reina (1994-1998):

Characteristics:
Democratic strengthening: Reina promoted the consolidation of democratic institutions and transparency
during his tenure, seeking to strengthen the rule of law in Honduras.
Population's interests: His government committed to addressing corruption and improving the living
conditions of the population, although faced significant challenges in implementing reforms.

 Carlos Roberto Flores Facussé (1998-2002):

Characteristics:
Economic stability: Flores Facussé implemented economic policies aimed at promoting stability and economic
growth, seeking to attract foreign investment and foster development.
Vested interests: Although his government made progress in areas such as economic stability, it also faced
criticism for corruption and lack of significant progress in combating poverty and inequality.
Positive actions: He promoted economic reforms aimed at promoting growth and economic stability, as well as
measures to modernize the state and promote foreign investment.

 Ricardo Maduro Joest (2002-2006):

Characteristics:
Security policies: Maduro Joest focused on security policies and combating organized crime during his tenure,
implementing measures to strengthen security institutions and improve the state's response capacity.
Population's interests: His government sought to address challenges related to security and criminality,
although faced criticism for human rights violations and lack of progress in areas such as education and health.
Positive actions: He promoted policies aimed at improving citizen security and combating organized crime,
although his administration faced criticism for human rights management and lack of progress in other areas.

 Manuel Zelaya (2006-2009):

Characteristics:
Progressive policies: Zelaya implemented progressive policies, including increases in the minimum wage and
social programs aimed at reducing poverty and inequality.
Power struggle: His government faced resistance and opposition from conservative and military sectors, which
eventually culminated in a coup in 2009.
Positive actions: He promoted social policies aimed at improving the living conditions of the most vulnerable
population, although his tenure was marked by political polarization and confrontation with conservative
sectors.

 Porfirio Lobo Sosa (2010-2014):¿

Characteristics:
Restoration of stability: Lobo Sosa sought to restore political stability and promote national reconciliation
after the 2009 coup, implementing measures to strengthen democratic institutions and promote political
dialogue.
Vested interests: Although his government made certain advances in areas such as security and the economy, it
also faced criticism for corruption and lack of significant progress in areas such as justice and transparency.
Positive actions: He promoted policies aimed at strengthening democratic institutions and restoring political
stability, although his legacy was tarnished by accusations of corruption and lack of progress in other areas.

 Juan Orlando Hernández (2014-2022):

- Characteristics:
- Security-focused governance: Hernández's presidency was marked by a strong emphasis on security and
combating organized crime. He implemented measures such as the creation of elite police units and the
deployment of military forces to tackle crime and violence.
- Concentration of power: Hernández's administration faced criticism for centralizing power and weakening
democratic checks and balances. Critics accused him of authoritarian tendencies and undermining institutional
independence.
- Allegations of corruption: Hernández's government was marred by allegations of corruption, including
accusations of embezzlement, bribery, and ties to drug trafficking organizations. These allegations raised
concerns about transparency and accountability in his administration.
- Economic policies: Hernández implemented economic reforms aimed at promoting growth and attracting
foreign investment. However, critics argued that these policies disproportionately benefited the wealthy elite
and failed to address underlying socioeconomic inequalities.
- Human rights concerns: Hernández's presidency was criticized for human rights abuses, including reports
of extrajudicial killings, political persecution, and restrictions on freedom of expression. Human rights
organizations raised concerns about the erosion of democratic freedoms under his leadership.
- Political controversies: Hernández's reelection in 2017 was marred by allegations of electoral fraud and
irregularities, leading to widespread protests and international scrutiny. The contested election raised questions
about the integrity of Honduras' electoral process and fueled political tensions throughout his second term.
Overall, Juan Orlando Hernández's presidency was characterized by a mix of security-driven policies,
allegations of corruption, concerns about democratic backsliding, and socioeconomic challenges. His
administration faced significant domestic and international criticism, highlighting the complex political
landscape of Honduras during his tenure.
These characteristics show how the different presidential administrations of Honduras have addressed a variety
of issues, from economic stability and security to democracy and human rights. Each president has left a unique
legacy, with their own strengths and weaknesses, shaping the country's political and social history.

The student makes good use of the lexicon and deepens the reading.
The student writes the conclusions in a coherent and clear way.
The student concentrates the requested principles and analyzes them.
The student presents his/her work professionally and completely.
The student is punctual in the delivery of the work.