Status Quo of MR Weak Coverage Indicators

Source: Youcheng Education Time: 2021-02-07 17:09:40

Status Quo of MR Weak Coverage Indicators in Zhongxing District, Ganzhou

After continuous optimization of the weak coverage cells, the current overall MR coverage rate of
Zhongxing District in Ganzhou is 97.27%, the current MR coverage rate of Huichang, Shicheng, Xunwu
and Xingguo has exceeded the target value of 97.5%, and the MR coverage rate of Dingnan and Longnan
is close to the target. The remaining Anyuan, Yudu, Ruijin, and Ningdu are still far from the target value,
and further optimization measures have been provided.

Comparison of changes in indicators before and after adjustment by districts and counties:

Districts
and Anyuan Dingnan Huichang Longnan Ningdu Ruijin stone city Xingguo Xunwu Yudu total
counties

before
95.09% 96.65% 96.59% 96.13% 94.89% 93.90% 97.04% 96.36% 97.47% 94.85% 95.53%
fixing

current 96.98% 97.49% 97.89% 97.41% 97.00% 96.54% 98.02% 97.66% 98.08% 97.00% 97.27%

Comparison chart of changes in indicators before and after adjustment in each district and county:

After the adjustment, the MR coverage rate of all districts and counties has been greatly improved, and
the overall coverage rate has increased by 1.74%.

Tracking table of coverage rate by districts and counties:

date Anyuan Dingnan Huichang Longnan Ningdu Ruijin stone city Xingguo Xunwu Yudu total
February 6 95.09% 96.65% 96.59% 96.13% 94.89% 93.90% 97.04% 96.36% 97.47% 94.85% 95.53%

February 7 94.83% 96.46% 96.57% 96.07% 94.70% 93.93% 96.88% 96.17% 97.39% 94.79% 95.43%

February 8 95.06% 96.59% 96.85% 96.11% 94.96% 94.27% 97.14% 96.57% 97.56% 94.94% 95.84%

February 9 95.26% 97.18% 97.20% 96.64% 94.94% 94.79% 97.59% 96.71% 97.45% 94.77% 95.89%

February 1095.02% 96.49% 96.97% 96.38% 94.55% 94.55% 97.17% 96.42% 97.65% 94.48% 95.60%

February 1194.38% 96.23% 96.85% 96.11% 94.05% 94.25% 96.96% 96.34% 97.21% 94.51% 95.36%

February 1295.37% 96.50% 96.83% 96.13% 94.68% 94.43% 97.27% 96.36% 97.39% 94.64% 95.61%

February 1695.96% 96.50% 96.92% 96.62% 95.21% 95.17% 97.29% 96.39% 97.22% 94.69% 95.90%

February 1795.78% 96.70% 97.02% 96.49% 95.15% 95.27% 97.21% 96.28% 97.21% 94.58% 95.87%

February 1895.79% 96.45% 97.02% 96.40% 95.44% 95.23% 97.15% 96.50% 97.09% 94.55% 95.87%

February 1996.10% 96.49% 97.07% 96.20% 95.16% 95.20% 97.25% 96.51% 97.40% 94.72% 95.89%

February 2096.03% 96.54% 97.01% 96.41% 95.41% 95.36% 97.12% 96.61% 97.32% 95.14% 96.05%

February 2196.15% 96.59% 97.03% 96.55% 95.52% 95.32% 97.19% 96.75% 97.29% 94.89% 96.06%

February 2295.93% 96.54% 97.06% 96.41% 95.49% 95.24% 97.14% 96.62% 97.17% 95.12% 96.03%

February 2395.89% 96.72% 97.00% 96.48% 95.35% 95.48% 97.10% 96.55% 97.30% 95.19% 96.07%

February 2495.70% 96.65% 97.04% 96.40% 95.37% 95.38% 97.10% 96.50% 96.89% 94.82% 95.94%

February 2595.29% 96.43% 96.79% 96.11% 95.05% 94.91% 96.60% 96.11% 96.65% 94.25% 95.54%

February 2695.39% 96.30% 96.67% 95.90% 95.08% 94.97% 96.91% 96.15% 96.80% 94.14% 95.54%

February 2795.42% 96.52% 96.78% 96.03% 95.29% 95.13% 97.03% 96.56% 96.81% 94.66% 95.78%

February 2895.19% 96.64% 96.64% 96.15% 95.17% 94.96% 97.11% 96.31% 96.71% 94.65% 95.70%

March 3 95.37% 96.45% 96.99% 96.34% 95.30% 95.31% 97.15% 96.10% 96.55% 94.37% 95.76%

March 4th 95.82% 96.18% 96.94% 96.12% 95.11% 94.94% 97.05% 96.03% 96.00% 94.06% 95.55%

March 5 95.82% 96.23% 96.84% 95.78% 95.04% 94.90% 97.00% 95.83% 96.61% 94.03% 95.51%

March 6 96.06% 96.68% 96.84% 96.33% 94.92% 94.80% 97.06% 95.98% 96.89% 94.31% 95.67%

March 7 96.19% 97.10% 97.24% 96.23% 95.83% 95.49% 96.89% 96.76% 97.26% 95.27% 96.21%

March 8 95.93% 97.08% 97.20% 96.22% 95.97% 95.56% 96.90% 96.90% 97.23% 95.34% 96.24%

March 9 95.82% 97.04% 97.17% 96.00% 96.06% 95.52% 97.02% 96.87% 97.06% 95.36% 96.21%
March 10 95.61% 96.80% 97.13% 95.75% 95.77% 95.37% 96.79% 96.67% 96.72% 95.23% 96.01%

March 11 95.15% 96.45% 97.31% 95.42% 95.54% 95.08% 96.57% 96.57% 96.43% 94.83% 95.75%

March 12 95.60% 96.60% 97.18% 95.27% 95.51% 94.86% 96.63% 96.41% 96.73% 94.74% 95.72%

March 13 95.80% 96.85% 97.14% 95.75% 95.69% 95.29% 96.78% 96.71% 96.94% 95.16% 96.01%

March 14 95.81% 96.87% 97.23% 96.08% 95.75% 95.04% 96.92% 96.69% 96.80% 95.32% 96.04%

March 15 96.81% 97.00% 97.67% 96.96% 96.38% 95.92% 97.78% 97.41% 97.68% 96.57% 96.86%

March 16 96.51% 97.10% 97.64% 96.99% 96.44% 95.93% 97.84% 97.36% 97.68% 96.55% 96.85%

March 17 96.06% 97.07% 97.67% 96.82% 96.38% 95.84% 97.78% 97.38% 97.42% 96.70% 96.78%

March 18 95.54% 96.87% 97.65% 96.59% 96.48% 95.58% 97.94% 97.17% 97.17% 96.28% 96.52%

March 19 95.70% 96.90% 97.49% 96.38% 96.06% 95.64% 97.52% 97.27% 97.28% 96.09% 96.46%

March 20 96.10% 97.24% 97.59% 97.11% 96.31% 95.72% 97.73% 97.49% 97.53% 96.21% 96.72%

March 21 96.57% 97.40% 97.75% 97.19% 96.50% 96.13% 97.83% 97.39% 97.72% 96.48% 96.92%

March 24 96.57% 97.13% 97.59% 97.04% 96.39% 96.07% 97.70% 97.58% 97.70% 96.68% 96.87%

March 25 96.29% 96.86% 97.74% 96.87% 96.25% 95.67% 97.42% 97.32% 97.41% 96.40% 96.54%

March 26 96.33% 97.09% 97.89% 96.69% 96.34% 95.71% 97.63% 97.50% 97.72% 96.57% 96.67%

March 27 96.72% 97.37% 97.77% 97.31% 96.82% 96.27% 97.86% 97.71% 97.91% 96.81% 97.12%

March 28 96.98% 97.49% 97.89% 97.41% 97.00% 96.54% 98.02% 97.66% 98.08% 97.00% 97.27%

The trend tracking chart of coverage rate indicators in various districts and counties in Ganzhou:
LTE mobile phone traffic resident ratio indicator statistics:

Districts and
factory September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 Fe
counties

stone city ZTE 97.54% 97.87% 98.14% 98.13% 98.24% 9

Ningdu ZTE 97.06% 97.50% 97.70% 97.82% 98.01% 9

Huichang ZTE 96.74% 97.41% 97.65% 97.73% 98.02% 9

Yudu ZTE 96.21% 96.78% 97.24% 97.54% 97.85% 9

Anyuan ZTE 96.97% 97.34% 97.53% 97.58% 97.87% 9

Xingguo ZTE 95.76% 96.40% 96.74% 97.12% 97.56% 9

Ruijin ZTE 96.39% 96.90% 97.25% 97.60% 97.88% 9

Longnan ZTE 97.16% 97.47% 97.75% 98.02% 98.01% 9

Xunwu ZTE 96.31% 97.03% 97.45% 97.50% 97.75% 9

Dingnan ZTE 95.86% 96.36% 96.83% 97.02% 97.13% 9

 The MR adjustment did not have a negative impact on the mobile phone traffic dwell ratio.

Statistics of MR Weak Coverage Cells in Ganzhou

Statistical method: Weak coverage ratio>20%, and the total number of MR RSRP sampling points>10000

The statistics of the number of weak coverage cells of the whole network in Zhongxing District of
Ganzhou in March are shown in the following table, among which the proportion of weak coverage cells
in Anyuan is 2.18%, and the number of weak coverage cells in Ningdu is at most 9.

County total number of cells Weak coverage cells Proportion of weak coverage cells

Summary 4507 39 0.87%

Anyuan 321 7 2.18%

Dingnan 307 1 0.33%

Huichang 382 3 0.79%

Longnan 449 5 1.11%

Ningdu 537 9 1.68%

Ruijin 685 7 1.02%

stone city 302 1 0.33%

Xingguo 603 1 0.17%

Xunwu 304 0 0.00%

Yudu 617 5 0.81%

Distribution map of weak coverage cells:

Currently, Ningdu, Ruijin, and Anyuan weak coverage cells account for a relatively high proportion of the
total weak coverage cells, which need to be resolved first.

Statistics on the proportion of ultra-long and ultra-high stations

Structural analysis: According to the following data, there are many super-high stations in the
assessment area of Zhongxing District, Ganzhou, which are 62 districts. The average distance between
stations in each county is larger, exceeding 3.5KM.

The distribution of station heights in Ganzhou in March is as follows, Xingguo County has the most
superhigh stations, followed by Ruijin and Ningdu.

Summary
Station of the
H<30m 30m<=H<40m40m<=H<50m50m<=H<60m60m<=H
height (H) number
of cells

Anyuan 192 90 33 6 0 321

Dingnan 235 72 3 0 0 310

Huichang 222 154 3 6 0 385

Longnan 351 86 16 5 0 458

Ningdu 322 176 31 5 3 537

Ruijin 390 245 35 15 0 685

stone city 183 101 18 0 0 302

 Xingguo 411 131 45 16 0 603

Xunwu 249 36 23 0 0 308

Yudu 311 284 16 6 0 617

Summary 2866 1375 223 59 3 4526

Station height distribution map:

According to the statistics on the distance between stations in Ganzhou counties, Longnan County has
the largest distance between stations, followed by Xingguo, Ningdu and Ruijin.

Districts and total number Number of Number of County station Rural station
The total area County area rural area
counties of sites county sites rural sites distance spacing

Yudu 2893 40.4 2852.6 696 188 508 0.238451956 1.355927646

Xingguo 3214 83.61 3130.39 652 180 472 0.655242337 1.540977646

Ningdu 4053 55.15 3997.85 631 159 472 0.452339992 1.561078525

Ruijin 2448 59.88 2388.12 532 204 328 0.351582767 1.540568307

Huichang 2722 39.03 2682.97 472 131 341 0.515020698 1.517343255

Anyuan 2375 23.55 2351.45 391 104 287 0.385333711 1.503337602

Longnan 1641 83.47 1557.53 412 145 267 0.307856986 1.638846714

Xunwu 2311 16.49 2294.51 396 112 284 0.285427126 1.700072741

stone city 1582 17.51 1564.49 322 119 203 0.55619837 1.595081594

Dingnan 1316 29.36 1286.64 319 125 194 0.394570346 1.393467649