Criterion 7 Continuous Improvement 50

7.1 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs 20
& PSOs

Table 7.1 Attainment levels & actions for improvement (2021-22) CAYm1

TARGE
ATTAINMEN
T OBSERVATIONS
T LEVEL
LEVEL
PO1: Apply the knowledge of
mathematics and science with
fundamentals of Electrical Attained the target
2.1 2.65
Engineering to solve complex level.
engineering problems
Action 1: Introduction classes were conducted to introduce engineering concepts over
science.
Action 2: Bridge courses were conducted before the semester beginning to lateral entry
students
Action 3: Special classes for slow learners were conducted to improve the mathematical
knowledge of the students.
PO2: Identify, formulate, review
research literature, and analyse
complex engineering problems
related to Electrical Engineering and
Attained the target
reaching substantiated conclusions 2.1 2.24
level.
using first principles of mathematics,
natural sciences, and engineering
sciences.
Action 1: Experts are invited to deliver the concepts and recent development in the difficult
subjects.
Action 2: Coaching classes were conducted for problematic subjects after the regular time
table

PO3: Design solutions for complex

engineering problems related to
Electrical Engineering and develop
processes that meet the specified
Target level is not
needs with appropriate consideration
2.1 2.03 attained.
for the public health and safety, and
the cultural, societal, and
environmental considerations.
Action 1: Value added courses to be conducted.
Action 2: Guest Lecture to be Conducted.

PO4: Use research-based knowledge

and research methods including
design of experiments, analysis and
Attained the target
interpretation of data, and synthesis 2.1 2.28
level.
of the information to provide valid
conclusions
Action 1: Students were advised to refer research articles to choose their final year projects.
Action 2: More research problems has given for practice.
PO5: Create, select, and apply
appropriate techniques, resources, and Target level is not
modern engineering and IT tools 2.1 1.67 attained.
including prediction and modelling to
Electrical Engineering related
complex engineering activities with
an understanding of the limitations.
Action 1: Students will be allowed for industrial visits to get exposed on new technologies
Action 2: NPTEL Videos.
Action 3: More problems will be given for practice.
PO6: Apply reasoning informed by
the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and
cultural issues and the consequent Target level is not
responsibilities relevant to the 2.1 1.68 attained.
Electrical Engineering professional
practice.
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching method to be adapted.
Action 2: Students need to be encouraged to participate in engineering
societies ,symposium and conference.
PO7: Understand the impact of the
professional Electrical Engineering
solutions in societal and 2.1 1.73 Target level is not
environmental contexts, and attained.
demonstrate the knowledge and need
for sustainable development.

Action 1: Webinar to be Conducted

Action 2: Workshop to be Conducted
PO8: Apply ethical principles and
commit to professional ethics and
responsibilities and norms of the 2.1 2.96 Attained the target
engineering practice level.
Action 1: Awareness and orientation Program Conducted.
Action 2: Internships and industrial oriented training made frequent for understanding
current affairs.
PO9: Function effectively as an
individual, and as a member or leader 2.1 2.47 Attained the target
in diverse teams, and in level
multidisciplinary settings.
Action 1: Mock Interview, Group Discussion and Club activities have been conducted.
Action 2: Practical Training.
PO10: Communicate effectively on
complex engineering activities with
the engineering community and with 2.1 2.47 Attained the target
 society at large, such as, being able to
comprehend and write effective
reports and design documentation, level
make effective presentations, and
give and receive clear instructions.
Action 1: Communication skills programme was conducted.
Action 2: Placement Orientation program were arranged.
PO11: Demonstrate knowledge and
understanding of the engineering and
management principles and apply
these to one’s own work, as a
Attained the target
member and leader in a team, to 2.1 2.28
level
manage projects and in
multidisciplinary environments
Action 1. Regular counselling regarding importance of industrial relations and projects.
Action 2. Involving faculties in students team to improve team coordination capabilities
among students.

PO12: Recognize the need for, and

have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent and life-long Target level is not
2.1 2.08
learning in the broadest context of attained.
technological change.
Action 1: Carrier Opportunities at Electrical Engineering needs to be Conducted
Action 2: Practical approach of teaching needs to be adapted.

TARGE
ATTAINMEN
T OBSERVATIONS
T LEVEL
LEVEL
PSO I: identify, formulate and 2.2 2.07
investigate various real time problems Target level is not
attained.
of Electrical Machines,
Electronics applications, Control
System, Instrumentation System,
Power system and Power Electronic
&
drives.
Action 1: More Add on courses, value added courses and technical expert lectures is needed
Action 2: Additional experiments needs to be conducted beyond the curriculum
PSO II: Can develop conventional
and renewable energy systems for 2.2 2.23 Attained the target
Power generation and distribution. level
Action 1: Hands on Training and workshops have been arranged to enhance new ideas.
Action 2: Industrial oriented training made frequent for understanding current Scenario.

PSO III Successful in developing

electrical and electronics systems
& innovative 2.2 2.01 Target level is not
solutions pertaining to industry and attained.
Society.
Action 1: Industrial Visit and Internship needs to be arranged to enhance new ideas.
Action 2: Students needs to be encouraged to know outside world of electrical subject.

7.2 Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment 10

The internal quality audit cell of Jaya Engineering College functions as Academic Audit
cell. Department activities are reviewed by the IQAC members once in a month. The
main objective of IQAC is
 To develop a system for conscious, consistent and catalytic action to improve the
academic and administrative performance of the institution.
 To promote measures for institutional functioning towards quality enchancement
through internalization of quality culture and best practices.
Composition of the IQAC
IQAC has been constituted in the institution with the aim of improving the quality of
education.
The members of the IQAC are as follows.
1. CHAIRMAN: Head of the Institution
2. Institute IQAC coordinator
3. Head of the Department
4. Department IQAC coordinator.
5. Members of internal quality Audits.
Table 7.7 IQAC MEMBERS
S.No NAME DESIGNATION

1 DR.G.SANKARANARAYANAN Principal

2 DR. VENKATESH BABU IQAC Coordinator

3 DR.V.NANDHAGOPAL Head, Department of EEE
4 Mr.M.KUMARAN Academic Coordinator
Department IQAC
5 Mrs.R.KANAGAVALLI
Coordinator
6 Mrs.S.JEBACHRISTLA Class Advisor
6 Mr.V.PREMSANGEETH Class Advisor
7 Mr.M.G.RAJKUMAR Class Advisor

IQAC/ISO Auditing
IQAC functions under the guidance of the principal. Internal audit is conducted by
IQAC cell for every 3 months and the following activities are reviewed
 Preparation of the academic schedule.
 Conduction of the theory classes and practical classes
 Monitoring and conducting internal assessment and university exams.
 Placement and training offered and maintaing placement database.
  Encouraging the faculty members to do research and produce good quality
publications.
Some of the functions the IQAC at the departmental level
 Class committee meetings
 Class room observation by HOD
 Academic Audit
 Counseling and coaching for slow learners
 Department Meeting with HOD
 Use of ICT for teaching
 Encouraging the students to take part in co-curricular and extracurricular activities.
 Result analysis after every test and conducting corrective actions.
 Collecting student feedback and analyzing
 Management Review meeting.
During the audit of course files,
 University syllabus and lesson plan of the corresponding subjects are verified.
 Hand written notes of the corresponding subjects are verified.
 Three years previous university question papers along with question bank are
verified.
 Assignment topics, Tutorial questions are checked.
 The log book and track record of the lab sessions are verified at the end of the
semester.
 The syllabus coverage of the theory / lab classes is verified periodically.

The course file must include the following

 Table 7 Course file Contents
S.No. Contents
1 Institute Vision and Mission Statement
2 Department Vision, Mission Program Educational Objective Statement
3 Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes Statements
4 Course Syllabus
5 Course Information Sheet with Course Objectives, Course Outcomes,
PO/PSO Mapping, Mapping-Justification, Gaps in Syllabus, Content
Beyond Syllabus
6 Lesson plan
7 Time Table
8 Unit wise Lecture Notes
9 Sample PPT print out
10 University Question papers (last 5 years)
11 Internal question paper (with co & blooms level), answer key and sample
answer scripts.
12 Assignment topics with reference (Multiple Topics)-Minimum three with CO
mapping
13 Tutorial sheets (separate sheets)
14 Unit wise question bank
15 GAPS & PLANS FOR ADD on programs (plan and schedule)
16 Content beyond syllabus-References
17 Any innovative method/ Applications adopted, Description
18 Result Analysis, Remedial and corrective action & Course outcomes
Assessment
19 logbook
Lectures and labs evaluation: Departmental IQAC coordinator ensures the timely
syllabus coverage in theory and laboratory courses as per the university schedule. IQAC
coordinator also audits for contents beyond the syllabus and curriculum gaps
implementation.
Student feedback: Student feedback on faculty is taken from students during 6th week of
the semester.
a) Programme Assessment Committee (PAC):
Programme Assessment Committee (PAC) is formed at the department level to ensure
quality in execution and implementation of the program. PAC verifies the adaptation of
continues quality improvement initiatives in enhancing the attainment of COs, POs and
PSOs. PAC also monitors all the academic related activities and suggest timely suitable
amendments through its meetings. The constitution of the PAC is presented in Table

Table 7.9 Committee members of Programme Assessment Committee

S.No NAME DESIGNATION
1 Dr.V.NANDHAGOPAL Head, Department of EEE
2 Dr.P.Veeramanikandan Department NBA Coordinator
3 Mr.P.selvam Member
4 Mrs.S.Jebachristla Member
5 Mrs.R.Kanagavalli Member
6 Mr.V.Premsangeeth Member
7 Mr.S.Ganesh Member
b) Department Advisory Committee (DAC):
To maintain effectiveness and quality in academic related activities an external expert
person from academics and an industry person (stakeholders) have been incorporated in
the committee. The significant monitoring activities of DAC include implementation of
academics, preparation of programme curriculum (implementation of university
curriculum along with additional contents and
Curriculum gaps) monitor academic progress. The constitution of department advisory
committee is given in the table
 Table 7.10 Committee members of Department Advisory Committee

S. No. Name of the Member Designation

1 DR.G.SANKARANARAYANAN Principal

2 Dr.V.NANDHAGOPAL Head, Department of EEE

Mr.Y.SHAJAHAN
3 Technical Director Industry Member
Smart Protox
Chennai
Dr.R.ANAND
Professor
Department of EEE
4 Academic Member
Hindustan Institute of
technology
Coimbatore
Mrs.R.AMIRTHA
Assistant Engineer
5 R&D Member
Tamilnadu Electricity Board
Tiruninravur
Mr.GOPINATH
Graduate Engineer Trainee
6 Alstom Transport India Alumni
Limited
Bengalure

7 Mr.P.SELVAM Internal Member

8 Mr.R.THANGADURAI Internal Member

7.3 Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship

Training and Placement Cell provides necessary infrastructure for the students to get
placement. Also it offers guidance and training to the students for career planning and
personality development by conducting various short term programs. Training and
Placement cell invites different companies for campus recruitment of final year students
 Students are provided aptitude coaching and classes for communication skill
development right from second year onwards.
 Placement oriented value added courses have been conducted during semester
holidays.
 Students are given with Placement training from various external sources.
 Students are encouraged to do ICT lab for enhancing programming skills.
 Entrepreneurship Development camp used to be organized in the Department to
encourage the students to become entrepreneurs.
 Conduction of GATE coaching classes for 3rd year students.
 Conduction of UPSC, TNPSC and Bank coaching classes for students.
The list of student placement record and their salary package per annum for three
assessments year are listed in Table
 Details of Student Placement and Higher Education
S. CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3
Description
No.
Total no. of final year
1 13 19 33
Students (N)

2 No. of Placements (A) 10 13 23

Average Salary
3 2.2 2 2.5
(Rs/Annum in Lakhs)
Higher education GATE, GRE,
4 CAT, National/State Level - 3 3
Exams, etc. (B)

5 No. of Entrepreneurs (C) 1 1 2

Placement Index
6 0.85 0.89 0.85
[(A+B+C)/N]*100

Placement data for the year 2021-2022

S.No Type of Company Student Placed No of Student Placed

1 Core Company 2
2 IT Company 8
3 Total 10
Entrepreneur Comparative Analysis

S.No Academic Year Total Strength No. of Entrepreneur

1 2021-22 13 1
2 2020-21 19 1
3 2019-20 33 2
 Higher Studies Comparative Analysis
S.No Academic Year Total Strength No. of Higher Studies
1 2021-22 13 -
2 2020-21 19 3
3 2019-20 33 3

Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program

Last Three Years Admission Details

Admission of First Year Comparative Analysis

Admission of Lateral Entry Comparative Analysis
 Details 2021-2022 2020-2021 2019-2020

Total no of students
admitted
Anna
university Opening cut off
State / University /
counseling (Max marks 200)
Level entrance
examination / Others Closing cut off
(Anna University Total no of students
counseling / admitted
Management)
Opening cut off
Management
(Max marks 200)

Closing cut off

Total no of students
admitted
DOTE
counseling Opening score
Lateral Entry
details / Others Closing score
(Anna University
Total no of students
counseling /
admitted
Management)
Management Opening score

Closing score

Average CBSE/Any other Board Result of admitted

students (Physics, Chemistry & Maths) (%)