Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT OF SMT.

DIVYA
ARORA, LD. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
NORTH-WEST DISTRICT, ROHINI COURT, DELHI

CC NO. 7802 OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF:

MUKESH RASTOGI ...COMPLAINANT

VERSUS

DHARMENDER SINGH & ORS … ACCUSED


PERSONS

N.D.O.H: 21.06.2024

INDEX

S.NO. PARTICULARS PAGE


NO.
1. APPLICATION U/S 151 OF CPC FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
OF PF

2. AFFIDAVIT

COMPLAINANT
THROUGH
NEW DELHI
DATED: 29.05.2024

Nitin Goel
Advocate
Chamber No.C-91A, C.L. Joseph Block,
Tis Hazari Court, Delhi-110054
Mob: 9958617492
Email: advnitin@hotmail.com
BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT OF SMT. DIVYA
ARORA, LD. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
NORTH-WEST DISTRICT, ROHINI COURT, DELHI

CC NO. 7802 OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF:

MUKESH RASTOGI ...COMPLAINANT

VERSUS

DHARMENDER SINGH & ORS … ACCUSED


PERSONS

N.D.O.H: 21.06.2024

APPLICATION U/S 151 OF CPC FOR CONDONATION


OF DELAY IN FILING OF PF

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-

1. That the present matter is pending adjudication before this


Hon’ble Court and is listed for next date of hearing on
21.06.2024.
2. That vide order dated 09.04.2024 the Hon’ble Court
directed the complainant to supply the copy of complaint
to the concerned Naib Court.
3. That it is submitted that the erstwhile clerk of the counsel
of plaintiff unfortunately expired due to which the pf was
not filed. That only when new clerk was hired it was
discovered that inadvertently the PF has not been filed by
the previous clerk and due to his sudden demise this
factum was not in knowledge of the undersigned counsel.
4. That the delay was totally unintentional and only was due
to above said reason. Hence, the present application
5. That the present Application has been preferred on
abovementioned bonafide grounds and no prejudice would
be caused to the other party if the present Application is
allowed.
6. That on the other hand, great prejudice and damages that
can’t be compensated in terms of money would be caused
to the Complainant if the present Application is not
allowed.
PRAYER
In light of the aforementioned circumstances and facts, it is
humbly prayed by the Applicant that it may be pleased to
allow the present Application and thereby condone the delay
in filing PF

COMPLAINANT
THROUGH
NEW DELHI
DATED: 29.05.2024

Nitin Goel
Advocate
Chamber No.C-91A, C.L. Joseph Block,
Tis Hazari Court, Delhi-110054
Mob: 9958617492
Email: advnitin@hotmail.com
BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT OF SMT. DIVYA
ARORA, LD. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
NORTH-WEST DISTRICT, ROHINI COURT, DELHI

CC NO. 7802 OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF:

MUKESH RASTOGI ...COMPLAINANT

VERSUS

DHARMENDER SINGH & ORS … ACCUSED


PERSONS
AFFIDAVIT

I, Mukesh Rastogi, S/o Lt. Om Prakash, R/o: B- 5/265-266,


Sector-5, Rohini, Delhi-110085, does hereby solemnly affirm
and declare as under:
1. That I am the applicant/ complainant in the above captioned
application and as such fully conversant with the facts and
circumstances of the case, therefore, competent to swear this
affidavit.
2. That the accompanying application for condonation of delay
in filing of PF has been drafted by my counsel under my
instructions, the contents of which have been read over to me
and have explained to me and have explained to me in my
vernacular and are affirmed by me to be true and correct as
per the best of my knowledge.
3. That this is my true statement.
4. That the document annexed herewith are true and correct.
DEPONENT

VERIFICATION:
Verified at Delhi on day of 2024, that the contents of
the above affidavit are correct and true to the best of my
knowledge and belief. No part of it is ponent false and nothing
has been concealed from this Hon'ble Court.
DEPONENT

You might also like