3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Official reprint from UpToDate®

www.uptodate.com © 2023 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease

Authors: David E Rivadeneira, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, Scott R Steele, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS
Section Editor: Martin Weiser, MD
Deputy Editor: Wenliang Chen, MD, PhD

All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.

Literature review current through: Feb 2023. | This topic last updated: Sep 15, 2021.

INTRODUCTION

Hemorrhoids are normal vascular structures in the anal canal. Approximately 5 percent of the
general population is affected by symptoms related to hemorrhoidal disease [1]. The cardinal
features of hemorrhoidal disease include bleeding, anal pruritus, prolapse, extra tissue causing
difficulty with hygiene, and pain due to thrombosis. Although these symptoms may strongly
suggest the diagnosis, confirmation by flexible sigmoidoscopy, anoscopy, or colonoscopy
should be performed in most patients who present with bleeding, especially those deemed at
higher risk for malignancy or additional symptoms (ie, weight loss, changes in bowel habits)
and those who are not up to date on screening recommendations [2].

This topic will review common surgical techniques used to treat hemorrhoids. The anatomy and
clinical features of hemorrhoids, and nonsurgical treatment options, are discussed separately.
(See "Hemorrhoids: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and "Home and office treatment of
symptomatic hemorrhoids".)

INDICATIONS

The initial approach to treating most patients with hemorrhoids is conservative. Patients who
fail medical management may be candidates for a nonsurgical office-based procedure prior to
requiring surgical treatment. Ongoing symptoms in spite of conservative or office-based
treatment usually require surgical intervention. (See "Home and office treatment of
symptomatic hemorrhoids", section on 'Conservative treatment for all patients'.)

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 1/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Surgical excision of hemorrhoids remains a very effective approach for treatment of

symptomatic hemorrhoids but is reserved for selected patients [3]. A formal hemorrhoidectomy
in appropriately selected patients can resolve the patient's symptoms and minimizes recurrent
disease when performed properly. Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids, and those with
severe external disease, appear to benefit the most from surgery. Patients who are unable to
tolerate office-based procedures due to significant comorbidities or taking anticoagulation
medication may also benefit from an excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Some patients may prefer
surgical treatment sooner rather than later, after a frank discussion of other treatment options
and the benefits and risks of surgery. (See "Hemorrhoids: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis"
and "Home and office treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids".)

A surgical procedure is generally limited to those with the following clinical conditions [4]:

External hemorrhoids — (See 'External hemorrhoidectomy' below.)

● Symptomatic external hemorrhoids (eg, pain, thrombosis) refractory to conservative

measures
● Symptomatic external hemorrhoids (eg, pain, thrombosis) refractory to office-based
procedures, or unable to tolerate office-based procedures because of pain
● Large or severely symptomatic external hemorrhoids (eg, severe pain, interfere with
hygiene, severe skin irritation and itching)*
● Patients with substantial external skin tags
● Combined internal and significant external hemorrhoids
● Symptomatic external hemorrhoids in the presence of a concomitant anorectal condition
that requires surgery

*It is important to note that for some indications, failed prior treatment is not required prior to
proceeding with surgical treatment.

Internal hemorrhoids — (See 'Internal hemorrhoidectomy' below.)

● Prolapsed internal hemorrhoids that can be manually reduced (Grade III), particularly if
more than one column is involved*
● Prolapsed and incarcerated internal hemorrhoids (Grade IV)* ( picture 1)
● Symptomatic internal hemorrhoids (eg, pain, thrombosis) refractory to conservative
measures
● Symptomatic internal hemorrhoids (eg, pain, thrombosis) refractory to office-based
procedures, or unable to tolerate office-based procedures because of pain*
● Combined internal and external hemorrhoids

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 2/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

● Symptomatic internal hemorrhoids in the presence of a concomitant anorectal condition

that requires surgery

*It is important to note that for some indications, failed prior treatment is not required prior to
proceeding with surgical treatment.

PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION AND PREPARATION

The preoperative assessment includes a detailed history; physical examination, which includes
external inspection of the anus and a digital rectal examination; and anoscopy. Medications,
particularly those that increase the risk of bleeding (eg, warfarin, aspirin, clopidogrel,
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]), should be reviewed and are preferably held in
the perioperative period depending on the indications for treatment and risk of cessation.
Consultation with the patient's primary care provider or cardiologist may be warranted.
Perioperative management of anticoagulation is discussed separately. (See "Perioperative
medication management", section on 'Medications affecting hemostasis' and "Perioperative
management of patients receiving anticoagulants".)

In most cases, the patient is instructed to undergo a cleansing enema before the procedure. A
full mechanical bowel preparation is not indicated and may be counterproductive.

There is a paucity of data regarding the need for antibiotic prophylaxis. One retrospective study
reported that there was no benefit to preoperative use of metronidazole compared with no
antibiotics [5]. The authors agree that antibiotics are not necessary in most clinical settings, as
the risk of infection is low. Patients with underlying immunosuppression or extensive cellulitis
may benefit from perioperative antibiotics, such as metronidazole or a second-generation
cephalosporin.

Immediately prior to performing the procedure, anoscopy should be repeated in the semi-
inverted jackknife or left lateral position. The assessment includes an evaluation for the
presence of external hemorrhoids, location, volume, redundancy, and grade of internal
hemorrhoids. (See "Hemorrhoids: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)

ANESTHESIA

Hemorrhoid surgery can be performed using general anesthesia, conscious sedation, regional
anesthesia (spinal, epidural), perianal block, or straight local anesthesia [6-13]. The choice is
often one of surgeon preference, but patient-related factors also play a role. One of the authors

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 3/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

uses intravenous sedation and a perianal block for nearly all hemorrhoid surgeries.
Occasionally, a regional (spinal) anesthetic or general anesthetic may be needed for selected
patients, such as those with respiratory conditions (ie, cannot lay supine or prone, require
airway protection).

The patient is first anesthetized (general, regional, intravenous) and positioned (see
'Positioning' below) for the procedure. An anal block is performed (see 'Perianal
anesthesia/block' below), and a Hill-Ferguson retractor is placed into the anal canal and rectum
to facilitate adequate inspection of the individual internal hemorrhoid columns.

Positioning — Patient positioning is another primarily surgeon-dependent variable. Although

many anesthesia providers may be more comfortable with the lithotomy position, the authors
prefer prone jackknife positioning for most cases as it provides an excellent view and exposure
of the perianal region for the surgeon as well as for an assistant or trainee. The prone position
can be used for patients who need their airway controlled. The patient is typically intubated on
the transport stretcher first, then turned prone onto the operating room table. For these
patients, it may be prudent to keep the patient's stretcher in the operating room in the event
that the patient needs to be quickly returned to the supine position, though this is rarely
necessary. For patients unable to tolerate the prone position because of concerns with airway
control, the lithotomy or left-lateral positions are acceptable alternatives. However, visualization
and access to the base of the hemorrhoid may be more difficult.

In all cases, care should be taken to avoid unnecessary pressure on the male genitalia and to
pad all bony prominences, particularly the legs when lithotomy position is used. (See "Nerve
injury associated with pelvic surgery", section on 'Avoid prolonged lithotomy position'.)

Perianal anesthesia/block — Because of the frequency of postoperative pain, a perianal block

is administered to most patients. In a systematic review that assessed analgesia following
hemorrhoidectomy, perianal infiltration of local anesthetic provided significant pain relief,
whether given alone or as a supplement to other forms of anesthesia [14]. In randomized trials,
long-acting liposomal bupivacaine (eg, Exparel) was associated with a significantly greater
decrease in post-hemorrhoidectomy pain compared with traditional bupivacaine [15] and
decreased opioid use [16].

If spinal anesthesia is used, perianal anesthesia is not necessary. A formal pudendal nerve block
has also been shown to reduce hemorrhoidectomy pain in a systematic review including 17
studies [17].

An anal block is performed by injecting local anesthetic (eg, lidocaine, bupivacaine), typically
with epinephrine ( table 1), into the ischiorectal fat immediately peripheral to the external
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 4/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

sphincter [18]. Sodium bicarbonate (1 cc per 30 cc lidocaine) can be added per provider
discretion to help minimize local irritation with injection if the patient remains awake.

EXTERNAL HEMORRHOIDECTOMY

External hemorrhoids generally do not require surgical management. Exceptions may include
thrombosed external hemorrhoids or large external hemorrhoids that cause symptoms that
cannot be controlled or interfere with hygiene. (See "Home and office treatment of
symptomatic hemorrhoids", section on 'Conservative treatment for all patients' and
'Indications' above.)

Thrombosed external hemorrhoids — Patients with a thrombosed external hemorrhoid

present with an acutely painful purplish or blue mass in the perianal area ( picture 2 and
picture 1). Some surgeons advocate excision of the thrombosed external hemorrhoids to
prevent recurrent thrombosis. For those patients who present in persistent pain (typically within
72 hours from the onset), excision of the thrombosed external hemorrhoid provides immediate
relief [19]. Conservative management only is recommended when the patient presents with
diminishing symptoms (typically later than this 72 hour timeframe) [20]. After 48 to 72 hours,
the thrombus organizes and contracts, lessening symptoms and obviating the need for surgical
management. Occasionally, a thrombosed hemorrhoid will evacuate spontaneously, leaving a
small ulcer with residual clot at the anal opening ( picture 3). This will typically resolve on its
own over a few weeks, although the patient may be left with a skin tag that rarely causes
enough symptoms to warrant its removal. However, in those patients who have a skin tag large
enough to cause skin irritation, itching, pain, or inability to keep proper hygiene, excision can
be beneficial.

Techniques — When indicated, external thrombosed hemorrhoids are best treated with
hemorrhoid excision, rather than incision and simple evacuation of the clot, an approach that
should generally be avoided [21,22]. However, if timely evaluation by a surgeon is not available
and the provider is not comfortable with excision of the thrombosed hemorrhoid, incision of
the hemorrhoid can be performed to remove the clot, which should lessen symptoms. (See
'Excision' below and 'Incision' below.)

The recurrence rate for a completely excised thrombosed hemorrhoid is 5 to 19 percent [21,22].
By comparison, simple incision and evacuation of the clot is associated with a 30 percent risk of
reaccumulation and thrombosis, which may disseminate to adjacent hemorrhoidal columns
[20].

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 5/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Excision — Excision of external hemorrhoids (thrombosed or symptomatic) can be performed

in the operating room, emergency room, or an appropriately equipped office.

The skin overlying the hemorrhoid is prepped with povidone iodine solution, and local
anesthesia is infiltrated into the skin at the base and overlying the area of excision around the
hemorrhoid. A supplemental anal block, in addition to this infiltration, can also be performed
and is preferred by the authors. (See 'Perianal anesthesia/block' above.)

● Excision of a thrombosed hemorrhoid ( figure 1) is performed by making an elliptical

incision in the skin overlying the hemorrhoid. The thrombosis and the resultant
edematous tissue create a readily identifiable plane for dissection. The incision is carried
around the hemorrhoid and dissected with care from the superficial fibers of the anal
sphincter, making certain to avoid injury. Patients with extensive thrombosis ( picture 4)
have a higher risk of injury if the perianal skin and anoderm are aggressively resected. The
excision can be performed with a scalpel, scissors, or electrocautery pen, depending on
the preference of the surgeon. The skin edges can be left open and allowed to drain or
reapproximated with absorbable sutures, also depending upon surgeon preference [23]. A
topical antibiotic ointment can be applied to the wound; however, this is not necessary, as
infection is rare in this well-vascularized site.

● Excision of a nonthrombosed hemorrhoid is performed in the same manner, simply

making an elliptical incision around the skin and hemorrhoidal tissue (in the absence of a
clot).

Following excision of an external hemorrhoid, the anal area is covered by a dressing to protect
the clothing from soilage. (See 'Postoperative care and follow-up' below.)

Incision — For nonsurgeons who do not feel comfortable excising the overlying skin of a
thrombosed external hemorrhoid, an alternative is to simply incise the overlying skin.
Evacuation of thrombus from the hemorrhoid can produce immediate relief of pain. However,
clot evacuation is less likely to be beneficial if the patient is seen after 48 hours following the
onset of pain. In general, the authors do not recommend this technique, as when hemorrhoid
incision, rather than excision, is used, there can be residual clot if the incision is too small, and
reaccumulation of blood and thrombosis can occur. Thus, follow-up within the next 24 to 48
hours for surgical evaluation is generally advised. (See 'Techniques' above.)

INTERNAL HEMORRHOIDECTOMY

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 6/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Hemorrhoidectomy techniques differ predominantly based upon how the hemorrhoidal tissue
is removed and whether or not the rectal mucosa is closed. Conventional hemorrhoidectomy
excises the hemorrhoidal tissue with a scalpel, monopolar electrocautery, or other advanced
electrosurgical devices (eg, Ligasure, Harmonic scalpel). Alternative methods of
hemorrhoidectomy, such as stapling and hemorrhoidal artery ligation, have also been
performed. (See 'Techniques' below.)

Choosing a hemorrhoidectomy technique — A systematic review and network meta-analysis

of 98 randomized trials compared clinical outcomes and effectiveness of various
hemorrhoidectomy techniques used to treat grade III and IV internal hemorrhoids [24]. Results
indicate that ( table 2):

● Conventional hemorrhoidectomy has the highest rate of postoperative complications but

the lowest rate of recurrence.

● Hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) has the lowest rate of postoperative complications but
the highest rate of recurrence.

● Stapled hemorrhoidectomy has both a modest postoperative complication rate and a

modest recurrence rate.

● Conventional hemorrhoidectomies performed with one of the advanced electrosurgical

devices (eg, Ligasure or Harmonic scalpel) may cause less severe pain but cost more
compared with the ones performed with a scalpel or monopolar electrocautery.

The ultimate choice of procedure, however, is determined by surgeon preference as individual

surgeons may not have either the expertise or equipment required to perform all
hemorrhoidectomy procedures [20].

Open versus closed hemorrhoidectomy — The two main types of conventional

hemorrhoidectomy are the closed (Ferguson) hemorrhoidectomy and the open (Milligan-
Morgan) hemorrhoidectomy (excision and ligation without mucosal closure). (See 'Techniques'
below.)

Closed hemorrhoidectomy, or a modification of the technique, is the more commonly

performed procedure for internal hemorrhoidectomy. This technique is successful in 95 percent
of cases and has a low rate of wound infection [25]. Open hemorrhoidectomy is preferred for
acute gangrenous hemorrhoids where tissue edema and necrosis prevent closure of the
mucosa without undue tension [26]. In most other clinical settings, the handling of the mucosal
wound is left to the discretion of the surgeon, though the authors prefer a closed approach. In

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 7/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

general, there appears to be no definitive advantage between open or closed

hemorrhoidectomy [25,27]. When performing hemorrhoidectomy, all three hemorrhoidal
columns are usually treated simultaneously. For those less experienced in performing a three-
column hemorrhoidectomy or in patients with concern that this would result in anal stenosis,
one- or two-column hemorrhoidectomy may be performed [25].

One study compared open hemorrhoidectomy to a modified closed approach ("semi-open") in

300 patients [27]. The semi-open technique was associated with more rapid healing and a lower
incidence of postoperative complications. In another trial, 40 patients undergoing open and 40
patients undergoing closed hemorrhoidectomy were compared, and the pain score at the first
bowel movement was significantly lower for the closed group [28]. As might be expected,
wound healing was significantly faster for the closed group (75 versus 18 percent at three
weeks postoperatively). Nevertheless, in the absence of high-quality evidence, it remains up to
the discretion of the surgeon as to which of these techniques is performed [29].

Conventional versus stapled — Conventional hemorrhoidectomy can be used to treat both

internal and external hemorrhoids. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy does not address external
hemorrhoids. Thus, in patients with external or combined internal and external hemorrhoids,
conventional hemorrhoidectomy is preferred.

Both conventional hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy are most commonly used
to treat symptomatic prolapsing (grade II, III, and IV) internal hemorrhoids. A large randomized
trial (eTHoS) permitted direct comparison of the two techniques [30]. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy
resulted in less pain than conventional hemorrhoidectomy in the initial six weeks postsurgery.
At 12 and 24 months, however, patients treated with stapled hemorrhoidopexy reported worse
incontinence, tenesmus, and hemorrhoid symptoms; more hemorrhoid recurrences; and worse
quality of life compared with those treated with conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

Earlier trials and systematic reviews agreed that stapled hemorrhoidopexy was less painful but
that conventional surgery resulted in better symptom relief and fewer recurrences [31-34].
Additionally, postprocedural tenesmus and reoperations were more prevalent among patients
who underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy [33]. A 2019 meta-analysis also associated stapled
hemorrhoidopexy with higher rates of complications and recurrences compared with open
procedures [35].

Considering the evidence, we suggest choosing a hemorrhoidectomy procedure based on the

patient's values and preferences. Overall, conventional hemorrhoidectomy appears to offer
better and more durable outcomes than stapled hemorrhoidopexy. For patients who prefer to

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 8/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

minimize pain and "downtime" after surgery, however, stapled hemorrhoidopexy remains a
viable option.

Although more commonly reported for stapled hemorrhoidopexy than conventional

hemorrhoidectomy, serious complications can occur with both procedures [34]. In the eTHoS
trial cited above, serious adverse events, such as rectal bleeding, anal stenosis, and urinary
retention, occurred in 9 and 7 percent of patients undergoing conventional and stapled
hemorrhoid surgery, respectively [30]. (See 'Techniques' below.)

Stapled versus hemorrhoidal artery ligation — In a multicenter randomized trial of 393

patients with grade II or III internal hemorrhoids, hemorrhoidal artery ligation resulted in less
postoperative pain (visual analogic scale 2.2 versus 2.8 postoperative; 1.3 versus 1.9 at two
weeks) and a shorter sick leave (12 versus 15 days) but was more expensive (€2806 versus
€2538), took longer to perform (44 versus 30 minutes), left more residual grade III disease (15
versus 5 percent), and required more reoperations (8 versus 4 percent). Otherwise,
hemorrhoidal artery ligation and stapled hemorrhoidectomy had comparable complication (24
versus 26 percent) and patient satisfaction rates (>90 percent in both groups).

Techniques

Conventional — A variety of devices, including surgical scalpels, scissors, or electrosurgical

devices (eg, monopolar electrocautery, advance bipolar sealing [Ligasure], ultrasonic
desiccation [Harmonic scalpel], laser), can be used to make the incision and excise the
hemorrhoidal tissue [36-39]. (See "Overview of electrosurgery".)

The goals of hemorrhoid resection are to remove the redundant tissue, avoid damage to the
sphincter, and avoid taking too much anoderm, which might lead to anal stenosis. For
conventional hemorrhoidectomy, the junction of the internal and external component of the
hemorrhoid is grasped with a small clamp (eg, Allis, Babcock) to retract the hemorrhoid away
from the sphincter muscles. Using a scalpel or electrocautery pen, the rectal mucosa is scored
in an elliptical or diamond shape around the hemorrhoidal bundle to delineate the plane for
excision of the hemorrhoid. The incision is carried deeper starting distally on the external
hemorrhoidal tissue and extending proximally across the dentate line to the superiormost
extent of the hemorrhoidal column. The hemorrhoid tissue is carefully dissected from the
superficial internal and external sphincter muscles toward the main vascular pedicle in the anal
canal. Care must be taken not to narrow the anal canal when multiple hemorrhoidal excisions
are performed. Only the redundant anoderm associated with the hemorrhoidal tissue should
be removed, preserving a minimum of 1 cm of anoderm between columns.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 9/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

The base of the pedicle is suture ligated, and the hemorrhoidal tissue is removed. The mucosal
defect is then left open to heal by secondary intention or closed with a continuous 2-0 or 3-0
absorbable suture (eg, Vicryl). To minimize the chance of narrowing the anal canal, a Hill-
Ferguson retractor should be left in place until all suturing is complete. (See 'Open versus
closed hemorrhoidectomy' above.)

Stapled — Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is an alternative to conventional internal

hemorrhoidectomy. This procedure does not effectively treat most external hemorrhoids. The
need for a specialized device makes this procedure more expensive [40-43]. The technique uses
a circular stapling device to excise a circumferential column of mucosa and submucosa from the
upper anal canal, which reduces the hemorrhoidal tissue back into the anal canal and fixates
them into position [44]. The device also interrupts part of the hemorrhoidal blood supply,
thereby decreasing vascularity [45-47]. (See 'Techniques' above.)

An anal dilator or obturator is provided with the surgical stapler and provides gentle dilatation
of the anal canal ( figure 2). The circular stapling device is introduced into the anus, and the
mucosa/submucosa contents are brought into the stapler. Before the stapler is engaged or
fired, the posterior wall of the vagina should be assessed to ensure the stapler has not
inadvertently engaged it. This can be noted by moving the stapler and seeing that the posterior
vaginal wall does not tent or move with it. When the stapler is fired, it creates a circular fixation
of all tissues within the nonabsorbable circumferential purse string suture to the rectal wall. In
effect, it will draw up and suspend the prolapsed internal hemorrhoid tissue. The staple line
should be fully evaluated as this is a potential source for early bleeding and may require a
suture ligation. The most critical component of the procedure is the placement of the
pursestring suture in the mucosa/submucosa approximately 4 cm from the dentate line. It is
important that the pursestring suture be placed far enough proximal to avoid involving the
sphincter muscles within the stapling device, and to minimize other complications (eg, changes
in continence, stricture, fistula).

One role for stapled hemorrhoidopexy devices is to treat patients with bleeding and/or
prolapsing grade II to IV internal hemorrhoids who have failed rubber band ligation. Another
role may be for patients seeking a potentially less painful alternative to conventional surgery,
but the patient must be willing to accept a higher risk of recurrence [48]. (See 'Conventional
versus stapled' above.)

Occasional but important complications have been reported, including persistent

postdefecation pain, which affects a small percentage of patients. One study suggested that
such symptoms may respond rapidly and completely with oral nifedipine [49]. Although an
option for patients with grade II to IV internal hemorrhoids, the stapled techniques, as stated
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 10/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

above, will not address the external hemorrhoid component if present. Thus, in patients with
combined internal and external hemorrhoids, the external hemorrhoids are surgically excised,
obviating the benefit of using the stapling device.

Hemorrhoidal artery ligation — An alternative to a conventional hemorrhoidectomy or

stapled hemorrhoidopexy is Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL), also
known as transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) [50-54]. HAL uses a specially designed
proctoscope housing a Doppler transducer to identify each hemorrhoidal arterial blood supply,
which is subsequently ligated.

A meta-analysis identified 28 observational studies involving 2904 patients undergoing

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidectomy [55]. Recurrence rates ranged between 3 and 60 percent
(pooled mean 17.5 percent), and the rate of postprocedure hemorrhage was 5 percent. A later
randomized trial that included 40 patients with grade II or grade III hemorrhoids found that,
although fecal soiling was decreased using both treatments, patients treated with HAL had
significantly increased fecal soiling after one year compared with open hemorrhoidectomy [56].
Additional trials with longer-term observation are needed to determine the utility of this
approach.

In a randomized trial of 337 patients with symptomatic grade II or III internal hemorrhoids, HAL
resulted in fewer recurrences than rubber band ligation at 12 months (30 versus 49 percent)
[57]. However, this difference was almost entirely accounted for by the need for repeat banding,
which is a common practice but which was counted as recurrences in this study. Compared with
rubber band ligation, HAL was associated with more pain at one and seven days after the
procedure, more serious adverse events requiring hospitalization (7 versus 1 percent), and
higher cost (£1750 versus £723).

Thus, HAL is more effective but more painful and costly compared with a single rubber band
ligation. For patients with symptomatic grade II or III internal hemorrhoids, a course of rubber
band ligation remains the first-line procedure of choice due to its low morbidity and cost.
Patients who fail, refuse, or cannot tolerate rubber band ligation should be referred for one of
the surgical hemorrhoidectomy procedures. (See 'Choosing a hemorrhoidectomy technique'
above.)

Rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids is discussed in detail in another topic. (See
"Home and office treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids", section on 'Rubber band ligation'.)

OTHER PROCEDURES

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 11/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Supplemental sphincterotomy — Patients who have internal hemorrhoids that are associated
with a high resting internal anal sphincter pressure may benefit from supplemental
sphincterotomy. Sphincterotomy should generally be reserved for patients with concomitant
fissure disease, and it should be avoided in those who have normal resting sphincter pressure
[58]. (See "Anal fissure: Surgical management".)

POSTOPERATIVE CARE AND FOLLOW-UP

It is fairly common for patients to experience a fair amount of pain over the first few days, along
with significant swelling. Postoperative instructions include warm sitz baths, stool softeners,
and pain medication including oral narcotics and anti-inflammatory medications. Often, the
wounds will open after three to five days, and patients may note mucus drainage from the area.
High fevers (>101° F), significant expanding erythema or necrosis, or unremitting pain are all
concerning and warrant further evaluation.

Pain management — Pain following hemorrhoidectomy is nearly universal and may in part be
due to spasm of the internal sphincter. Perianal anesthetic infiltration at the time of
hemorrhoidectomy is important for reducing postoperative pain. (See 'Perianal
anesthesia/block' above.)

Initial pharmacologic treatment to control postoperative pain consists of oral analgesics, such
as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or acetaminophen [14]. Opioids may be given if
pain is not well controlled but carry the potential adverse effects of inducing constipation and
possibly worsening the pain.

Other options to manage pain have been evaluated in small randomized trials:

● A trial of 18 patients found that topical diltiazem ointment (2 percent) applied to the
perianal region three times daily for seven days postoperatively was significantly more
effective than placebo in reducing pain and the need for prescription narcotics [59]. The
mechanism of benefit is presumably related to relaxation of the internal anal sphincter.

● Botulinum toxin injection compared with placebo has been associated with significant
reductions in postoperative pain and the time of healing [60].

● Topical metronidazole (10%) has also been shown to decrease postoperative pain
following hemorrhoidectomy as well as decrease postdefecation discomfort [61]. Oral
metronidazole has also been shown to be beneficial for pain control [62], although the
data are still mixed [63].

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 12/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Local care — A sensation of "tightness" after the procedure can usually be alleviated with a
warm sitz bath that can be performed as often as needed by the patient. Of note, simple warm
water is all that is required, and the addition of other bath or Epsom salts is not necessary.

Avoiding constipation — A bulk fiber supplement and/or increased dietary fiber and fluid
intake will help reduce postoperative constipation and pain upon defecation. Fecal impaction
after a hemorrhoidectomy is associated with postoperative pain and opiate use. Most surgeons
recommend stimulant laxatives, stool softeners, and bulk fiber to prevent this problem. Should
impaction develop, manual disimpaction with anesthesia may be required.

COMPLICATIONS

The incidence of complications following hemorrhoidectomy is overall low. The main

complications following a standard technique for hemorrhoidectomy include urinary retention,
urinary tract infection, fecal impaction, and delayed hemorrhage. Surgical site infection is
uncommon after hemorrhoid surgery; however, submucosal abscess (<1 percent) and deep
space infection can occur, although severe fasciitis or necrotizing infections are rare [64,65].
Proper technique and adequate postoperative care can help prevent some of these
complications. (See 'Techniques' above and 'Postoperative care and follow-up' above.)

The nature of complications depends upon the type and extent of procedure.

● Following excision of a thrombosed external hemorrhoid, minor bleeding (<1 percent) and
local swelling are common, and perianal abscess/fistula can also occur (approximately 2
percent). The most common complication is recurrent hemorrhoids that require another
procedure (approximately 6 percent). Internal sphincter injury occurs infrequently (<1
percent) but has undesirable consequences [22]. (See 'Thrombosed external hemorrhoids'
above.)

● Following excision of internal hemorrhoids, the most common complications are bleeding
and urinary retention [44]. Rare complications are rectal perforation and sepsis,
rectovaginal fistula, minor changes in continence, and retroperitoneal and pelvic abscess
[64]. (See 'Internal hemorrhoidectomy' above.)

Urinary retention — Urinary retention following hemorrhoidectomy is observed in as many as

30 percent of patients [66]. Spinal anesthesia tends to be associated with higher rates of urinary
retention [6]. Limiting postoperative fluids may reduce the need for catheterization (from 15 to
less than 4 percent in one study) [67]. Warm sitz baths and pain medication also may lessen the
incidence of urinary retention and reduce the need for catheterization. Some patients will
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 13/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

require urinary catheterization, although some remain relatively asymptomatic. (See "Acute
urinary retention", section on 'Acute management'.)

Urinary tract infection — Urinary tract infection develops in approximately 5 percent of

patients after anorectal surgery [65], possibly secondary to occult urinary retention. (See
"Catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults".)

Bleeding — Delayed hemorrhage, probably due to sloughing of the primary clot, develops in 1
to 2 percent of patients; it usually occurs 7 to 16 days postoperatively [65]. No specific
treatment is effective for preventing this complication, which usually requires a return to the
operating room for suture ligation.

Fecal incontinence — Fecal incontinence can occur in approximately 2 to 10 percent of

patients [68,69]. Management of fecal incontinence, including medical therapy and injectable
materials, is reviewed separately. (See "Fecal incontinence in adults: Management".)

Other complications include sphincter damage (which is rare) and wound dehiscence (which is
common but usually of no clinical consequence). In most cases, minor alterations in continence
may be noted in the first few weeks following hemorrhoidectomy due to pain, anal spasm, and
changes in sensation (ie, discriminating between liquid, solid stool, and gas). These patients
typically get better with time, though bulking agents may help.

Anal stricture — Anal stricture formation occurs in approximately 1 percent of patients and for
internal hemorrhoidectomy is related to multiple column hemorrhoidectomies where too much
anoderm has been resected.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS

Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Hemorrhoids".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the
Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade
reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given
condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer
short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 14/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading
level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some
medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print
or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a
variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

● Basics topics (see "Patient education: Hemorrhoids (The Basics)")

● Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: Hemorrhoids (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

● Hemorrhoids are normal vascular structures in the anal canal. The initial approach to
treating most patients with hemorrhoids is conservative. For patients who fail medical
management or cannot tolerate an office-based procedure, surgical excision remains a
very effective approach for treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. For some indications,
failed prior treatment is not required prior to proceeding with surgical treatment. (See
'Introduction' above and 'Indications' above.)

● Routine perioperative antibiotics are not necessary. A full mechanical bowel preparation is
also not necessary, but patients are usually given an enema just prior to the procedure.
Medications that increase the risk of perioperative bleeding (eg, warfarin, aspirin,
clopidogrel, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]) should be reviewed and are
preferably held in the perioperative period depending on the indications for treatment
and risk of cessation. Consultation with the patient's primary care provider or cardiologist
may be warranted. (See "Perioperative medication management", section on 'Medications
affecting hemostasis'.)

● Patient positioning is primarily determined by the surgeon. The authors prefer prone-
jackknife positioning for most cases. For patients unable to tolerate the prone position
because of concerns with airway control, the lithotomy or left-lateral positions are
acceptable alternatives. However, visualization and access to the base of the hemorrhoid
may be more difficult. Care should be taken to avoid pressure points. (See 'Positioning'
above.)

● Hemorrhoid surgery can be performed using general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, or

straight local anesthesia. The choice is often one of surgeon preference, but patient-

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 15/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

related factors also play a role. For all hemorrhoid surgeries (external or internal
hemorrhoidectomy, internal hemorrhoidopexy), we infiltrate local anesthetic in the
perianal region at the time of hemorrhoidectomy, except in patients undergoing spinal
anesthesia. Perianal infiltration of local anesthetic provides significant pain relief, whether
given alone or as a supplement to other forms of anesthesia. (See 'Perianal
anesthesia/block' above.)

● External hemorrhoids generally do not generally require surgical management. When

surgery is indicated for thrombosed external hemorrhoids, we suggest hemorrhoid
excision rather than simple incision evacuation of the clot (Grade 2C). Simple incision and
evacuation of the clot is associated with a high rate of recurrence. (See 'External
hemorrhoidectomy' above and 'Thrombosed external hemorrhoids' above.)

● Internal hemorrhoidectomy techniques differ predominantly based upon how the

hemorrhoidal tissue is removed and whether or not the rectal mucosa is closed.

• The two main types of conventional hemorrhoidectomy are the closed (Ferguson)
hemorrhoidectomy and open (Milligan-Morgan) hemorrhoidectomy (excision and
ligation without mucosal closure). In general, there appears to be no definitive
advantage between open or closed hemorrhoidectomy, but closed hemorrhoidectomy
(or a modification of the technique) is more commonly performed to treat internal
hemorrhoids. All three internal hemorrhoidal columns are usually treated
simultaneously. (See 'Internal hemorrhoidectomy' above.)

• Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is an alternative to conventional internal hemorrhoidectomy.

It does not effectively treat external hemorrhoids. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy may
have a role in patients with bleeding and/or prolapsing grade II to IV internal
hemorrhoids who have failed rubber band ligation or for patients seeking a less painful
alternative to conventional surgery but who are willing to accept a higher risk of
recurrence. (See 'Stapled' above.)

• An alternative to a conventional hemorrhoidectomy or stapled hemorrhoidopexy is

Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL). HAL is associated with
the lowest rate of postoperative complications (including pain) but has the highest
recurrence rate. (See 'Hemorrhoidal artery ligation' above.)

● Following hemorrhoid surgery, the anal area is covered by a dressing to protect the
clothing. Pain can be controlled primarily using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents
and warm Sitz baths. Narcotic medications can be used, if needed, but these may cause

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 16/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

constipation. Patients are instructed to avoid constipation. The wounds will generally heal
within a couple of weeks. (See 'Postoperative care and follow-up' above.)

● The incidence of complications following hemorrhoidectomy is overall low. The main

complications following a conventional hemorrhoidectomy technique include urinary
retention, urinary tract infection, fecal impaction, and delayed hemorrhage. (See
'Complications' above.)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Terms of Use.

REFERENCES

1. Sneider EB, Maykel JA. Diagnosis and management of symptomatic hemorrhoids. Surg Clin
North Am 2010; 90:17.

2. Provenzale D, Gupta S, Ahnen DJ, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colorectal Cancer
Screening, Version 1.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 16:939.
3. Davis BR, Lee-Kong SA, Migaly J, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2018;
61:284.
4. Clinical Practice Committee, American Gastroenterological Association. American
Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: Diagnosis and treatment of
hemorrhoids. Gastroenterology 2004; 126:1461.
5. Wesarachawit W, Pattana-arun J. Antibiotics and early post operative complications of
closed hemorrhoidectomy: a retrospective matched pair study. J Med Assoc Thai 2007;
90:1828.
6. Moreira H Jr, Moreira JP, Isaac RR, et al. Morphine spinal block anesthesia in patients who
undergo an open hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective analysis of pain control and
postoperative complications. Ann Coloproctol 2014; 30:135.
7. Kim BC. Spinal block anesthesia with morphine in a hemorrhoidectomy. Ann Coloproctol
2014; 30:107.
8. Baptista JF, Gomez RS, Paulo DN, et al. Epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine with or without
clonidine and postoperative pain in hemorrhoidectomies. Acta Cir Bras 2014; 29:201.
9. Bansal H, Jenaw RK, Mandia R, Yadav R. How to do open hemorrhoidectomy under local
anesthesia and its comparison with spinal anesthesia. Indian J Surg 2012; 74:330.
10. Argov S, Levandovsky O, Yarhi D. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy under local
anesthesia - an old operation that stood the test of time. A single-team experience with
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 17/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

2,280 operations. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27:981.

11. Díaz-Palacios GA, Eslava-Schmalbach JH. Perirectal block for out-patient anorectal surgery:
a new technique. Biomedica 2011; 31:196.
12. Tepetes K, Symeonidis D, Christodoulidis G, et al. Pudendal nerve block versus local
anesthesia for harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Tech
Coloproctol 2010; 14 Suppl 1:S1.
13. Aphinives P. Perianal block for ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy, an easy technique for
general surgeon. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92:195.
14. Joshi GP, Neugebauer EA, PROSPECT Collaboration. Evidence-based management of pain
after haemorrhoidectomy surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 97:1155.
15. Haas E, Onel E, Miller H, et al. A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study for post-
hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic
formulation. Am Surg 2012; 78:574.
16. Gorfine SR, Onel E, Patou G, Krivokapic ZV. Bupivacaine extended-release liposome
injection for prolonged postsurgical analgesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy:
a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;
54:1552.
17. Fadel MG, Peltola L, Pellino G, et al. The Role of Pudendal Nerve Block in Colorectal
Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Invest Surg 2021; 34:1238.
18. Nyström PO, Derwinger K, Gerjy R. Local perianal block for anal surgery. Tech Coloproctol
2004; 8:23.
19. Aigner F, Gruber H, Conrad F, et al. Revised morphology and hemodynamics of the
anorectal vascular plexus: impact on the course of hemorrhoidal disease. Int J Colorectal
Dis 2009; 24:105.
20. Rivadeneira DE, Steele SR, Ternent C, et al. Practice parameters for the management of
hemorrhoids (revised 2010). Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54:1059.
21. Greenspon J, Williams SB, Young HA, Orkin BA. Thrombosed external hemorrhoids:
outcome after conservative or surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1493.

22. Jongen J, Bach S, Stübinger SH, Bock JU. Excision of thrombosed external hemorrhoid
under local anesthesia: a retrospective evaluation of 340 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;
46:1226.

23. Grosz CR. A surgical treatment of thrombosed external hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum
1990; 33:249.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 18/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

24. Simillis C, Thoukididou SN, Slesser AA, et al. Systematic review and network meta-analysis
comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. Br
J Surg 2015; 102:1603.
25. Ferguson JA, Mazier WP, Ganchrow MI, Friend WG. The closed technique of
hemorrhoidectomy. Surgery 1971; 70:480.
26. Pattana-arun J, Wesarachawit W, Tantiphlachiva K, et al. A comparison of early
postoperative results between urgent closed hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed
thrombosed hemorrhoids and elective closed hemorrhoidectomy. J Med Assoc Thai 2009;
92:1610.
27. Reis Neto JA, Quilici FA, Cordeiro F, Reis Júnior JA. Open versus semi-open
hemorrhoidectomy: a random trial. Int Surg 1992; 77:84.
28. You SY, Kim SH, Chung CS, Lee DK. Open vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum
2005; 48:108.

29. Arbman G, Krook H, Haapaniemi S. Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy--is there any
difference? Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:31.
30. Watson AJ, Hudson J, Wood J, et al. Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with
traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre,
randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 388:2375.
31. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with
conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis
Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1837.
32. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for
hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; :CD005393.
33. Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, et al. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy
vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch
Surg 2009; 144:266.
34. Nyström PO, Qvist N, Raahave D, et al. Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after
stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse. Br J Surg 2010; 97:167.

35. Du T, Quan S, Dong T, Meng Q. Comparison of surgical procedures implemented in recent

years for patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids: a network meta-analysis. Int J
Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:1001.

36. Nienhuijs S, de Hingh I. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with
symptomatic Hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; :CD006761.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 19/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

37. Hodgson WJ, Morgan J. Ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy with CO2 laser. Dis Colon Rectum
1995; 38:1265.
38. Senagore A, Mazier WP, Luchtefeld MA, et al. Treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease:
a prospective, randomized comparison of cold scalpel vs. contact Nd:YAG laser. Dis Colon
Rectum 1993; 36:1042.
39. Leff EI. Hemorrhoidectomy--laser vs. nonlaser: outpatient surgical experience. Dis Colon
Rectum 1992; 35:743.

40. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after
stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356:730.

41. Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. A randomized, controlled trial of
diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care
setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:491.

42. Koh DC, Cheong DM, Wong KS. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: bothersome staple line
bleeding. Asian J Surg 2005; 28:193.
43. Cirocco WC. Life threatening sepsis and mortality following stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Surgery 2008; 143:824.
44. Chapter 8. Hemorrhoids. Operative approaches to the treatment of hemorrhoids. In: Colon
& Rectal Surgery, 5th ed, Corman ML (Ed), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005.
p.210.
45. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-
Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355:782.
46. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled
haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled
trial. Lancet 2000; 355:779.
47. Peng BC, Jayne DG, Ho YH. Randomized trial of rubber band ligation vs. stapled
hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:291.
48. Ceci F, Picchio M, Palimento D, et al. Long-term outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for
Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51:1107.

49. Thaha MA, Irvine LA, Steele RJ, Campbell KL. Postdefaecation pain syndrome after circular
stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine. Br J Surg 2005; 92:208.
50. Felice G, Privitera A, Ellul E, Klaumann M. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: an
alternative to hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:2090.

51. Scheyer M, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, et al. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Am

J Surg 2006; 191:89.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 20/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

52. Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A, et al. Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as

a minimally invasive therapeutic approach to hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53:803.

53. Faucheron JL, Gangner Y. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of
symptomatic hemorrhoids: early and three-year follow-up results in 100 consecutive
patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51:945.

54. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, et al. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a

systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52:1665.

55. Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Lord AC, et al. Clinical outcome following Doppler-guided
haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15:e284.
56. Elmér SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE. A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal
dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of
hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56:484.
57. Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJ, et al. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band
ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree
haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet
2016; 388:356.
58. Arabi Y, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Anal pressures in hemorrhoids and anal fissure.
Am J Surg 1977; 134:608.
59. Silverman R, Bendick PJ, Wasvary HJ. A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial of the effect of a calcium channel blocker ointment on pain after
hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1913.
60. Patti R, Almasio PL, Muggeo VM, et al. Improvement of wound healing after
hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind, randomized study of botulinum toxin injection. Dis
Colon Rectum 2005; 48:2173.
61. Ala S, Saeedi M, Eshghi F, Mirzabeygi P. Topical metronidazole can reduce pain after
surgery and pain on defecation in postoperative hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum
2008; 51:235.
62. Lyons NJR, Cornille JB, Pathak S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of
metronidazole in post-haemorrhoidectomy pain relief. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:803.

63. Wilkie BD, Chandra R, Chua J, et al. Efficacy of postoperative oral metronidazole for
haemorrhoidectomy pain: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Colorectal
Dis 2021; 23:274.

64. Faucheron JL, Voirin D, Abba J. Rectal perforation with life-threatening peritonitis following
stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Br J Surg 2012; 99:746.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 21/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

65. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, et al. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence
and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:477.
66. Lyngdorf P, Frimodt-Møller C, Jeppesen N. Voiding disturbances following anal surgery.
Urol Int 1986; 41:67.
67. Bailey HR, Ferguson JA. Prevention of urinary retention by fluid restriction following
anorectal operations. Dis Colon Rectum 1976; 19:250.
68. Yang J, Cui PJ, Han HZ, Tong DN. Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure
hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:4799.
69. Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus milligan-morgan
hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative
follow up. Ann Surg 2005; 242:29.
Topic 14997 Version 22.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 22/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

GRAPHICS

Prolapsed internal hemorrhoids

Internal hemorrhoids that have prolapsed outside of the anal canal

and are visibly bleeding.

Courtesy of Scott R Steele, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS.

Graphic 75759 Version 3.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 23/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Comparison of commonly infiltrated local anesthetics

Maxim
Physiochemical properties allowa
dose
Infiltration Concentration
anesthetic (percent)
Onset of
Lipid:water Relative Duration
action mg/kg
solubility potency (minutes)
(minutes)

Lidocaine 1%

Without 1 2.9 2 2 to 5 50 to 120 4 to 5

epinephrine

With 1 2.9 2 2 to 5 60 to 180 5 to 7

epinephrine
(1:200,000)

Mepivacaine 1%

Without 1 0.8 2 2 to 5 50 to 120 5

epinephrine

With 1 0.8 2 2 to 5 60 to 180 5 to 7

epinephrine ¶
(1:200,000)

Bupivacaine 0.25%

Without 0.25 27.5 8 5 to 10 240 to 480 2 to 2.5

epinephrine

With 0.25 27.5 8 5 to 10 240 to 480 3

epinephrine
(1:200,000)

Procaine 1% Δ

Without 1 0.6 1 5 to 10 60 to 90 7 to 10
epinephrine

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 24/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

* Maximum total dose for intradermal-subcutaneous infiltration anesthesia may vary according to
site of administration and concomitant use of vasoconstrictors. The maximum dosing values in this
table are at the lower end of what many experts regard as safe. Lower doses and concentrations
than what are listed are generally used for children, debilitated patients, or those with cardiac
disease. Note that preparations of infiltrated local anesthetics are available in concentrations other
than those shown in table. Maximum allowable and maximum total volumes shown apply only to
the specific concentration of the preparation in table. Toxicity may occur with doses within the
suggested range, especially with inadvertent vascular injection.

¶ Not commercially available, provider must mix.

Δ Not commercially available in the United States or Canada.

Data from:
1. McCreight A, Stephan M. Local and regional anesthesia. In: Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Procedures, 2nd edition,
King C, Henretig FM (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2008.
2. McGee DL. Anesthetic and analgesic technique. In: Roberts and Hedges Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine,
5th edition, Roberts JR, Hedges JR (Eds), Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia 2010.

Graphic 56799 Version 19.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 25/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Thrombosed external hemorrhoid

This picture depicts a classic thrombosed external hemorrhoid.

Courtesy of W Brian Sweeney, MD.

Graphic 78700 Version 1.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 26/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Thrombosed external hemorrhoids

Photograph shows a swollen external hemorrhoid (arrows).

Reproduced with permission of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

Graphic 72916 Version 2.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 27/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Excision and clot evacuation of a thrombosed hemorrhoid

This figure depicts the procedure for an excision of a thrombosed hemorrhoid

and evacuation of the clot.

Figure A: Injection of local anesthetic at the base of the thrombosed hemorrhoid.

Figure B: Excision of an ellipse of skin with iris scissors. Do not excise deep into
the anal sphincter.

Figure C: Excised skin ellipse and clot evacuated.

Figure D: Hemorrhoid excised, clot evacuated, wound left open to heal. Note
underlying anal sphincter.

Graphic 67857 Version 4.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 28/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Circumferential thrombosed hemorrhoids - Hemorrhoidal

crisis

This picture shows thrombosis of multiple external hemorrhoids, a

hemorrhoidal crisis.

Courtesy of W Brian Sweeney, MD.

Graphic 60155 Version 1.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 29/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Comparison of hemorrhoidectomy techniques

Postoperative
Recurrence rate
pain/complication rate

Conventional with scalpel or ***** *

monopolar cautery

Conventional with Ligasure or ** *

Harmonic scalpel

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy *** ****

Hemorrhoid artery ligation * *****

Postoperative pain/complication and recurrence rates are ranked from * (lowest) to ***** (highest).

Graphic 105514 Version 1.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 30/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

(A) Prolapsing internal hemorrhoids.

(B) Placement of the pursestring suture at least 4 cm above the dentate line.

(C) Placement of stapler.

(D) Completed stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Graphic 101078 Version 3.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 31/32
3/30/23, 2:16 PM 14997

Contributor Disclosures
David E Rivadeneira, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible
companies to disclose. Scott R Steele, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS No relevant financial relationship(s) with
ineligible companies to disclose. Martin Weiser, MD Consultant/Advisory Boards: PrecisCa
[Gastrointestinal surgical oncology]. All of the relevant financial relationships listed have been
mitigated. Wenliang Chen, MD, PhD No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to
disclose.

Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are
addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be
provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must
conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.

Conflict of interest policy

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/14997/print 32/32