Main | Articles | Registration | Login Welcome Guest | RSS

MENU APPETIZERS
Main » Articles » Articles
Home page The Spoonfed Truth Facebook
Affidavit of Truth: Exclaiming Your Sovereignty, Making All Laws Exist In A Fiction
Money
Your Case Gullibility Factor Test
Health Who Is Running America
The Truth About The British
Mind Control
Monarchy
Exclaiming your Sovereignty, and Making Your
Quotes Requirement For Consent
Case Corporate Government
Spirituality
Dispatch of Merchants
Esoteric And Occult download the text file by clicking AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
A Primer On Martial Law
Throughout history, as a rite of passage, when humans wanted to How We Give Our Power Away
History
do something bold, whether it be running for office, climbing a tall The Mark of the Beast
Videos Freedom From De Facto Laws
mountain, getting married, or traveling to a distant land, they had
Photos always made some statement or declaration to the world in
regards to their decisions. When people make decisions which will
Take-Out (Links)
greatly affect their lives, and quite possibly the world around
Articles them, it is common for them to give speeches, write manifestos, SIDE DISHES
jot down poetry, or to create public contracts. When asserting
About Us
your status as a sovereign individual, with natural inherent rights, Build Freedom
Random which are self-evident even to the animals who reside in the thick Freedom School
brush, it is also important for you to make a public declaration. Four Winds
Sacred Geometry
Even as a dog respects the thorns of a rose, it seems apparent Sovereign Education
The Power Of Thought that respect and sovereignty would be self-evident, however, in Foundation Of Truth
human society, the necessity to formally declare one’s status as
free, remains important.

The Affidavit of Truth and learning how to sign your name

Login form correctly remain as the two easiest ways for a layman to do this. Search
An affidavit is a sworn testimony of truth written by an individual
that is often signed and confirmed in the presence of a notary.
When dealing with a court case, affidavits can be submitted to the Search
courts, and can be used as evidence, or even by request, you
could ask the courts to refute each point made within the
affidavit. If the affidavit cannot be refuted in a timely manner,
then it is recognized under Common Law that it becomes a
solidified statement of TRUTH, thus contributing to common law
itself.

"Court of appeals may not assume the truth of

allegations in a pleading which are contradicted by
affidavit.

Where affidavits are directly conflicting on material

points. It is not possible for the district judge to "weight”
the affidavits in order to resolve disputed issues; except in
those rare cases where the facts alleged in an affidavit are
inherently incredible, and can be so characterized solely by
a reading of the affidavit, the district judge has no basis for
a determination of credibility.” – Data Disc, INC v. System
Tech Assocs., Inc 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977)

"Moreover, Poole’s claim is sufficiently pleaded to satisfy

the pleading requirements in Rule 32.3 and Rle 32.6(b),
and his factual allegation were unrefuted by the state;
therefore, they must be accepted as true.” See Bates v.
State, 620 So.2d 745. 746 (Ala.Crim.App 1992) (* When
the States does not respond to a petitioners allegations,
the refuted statement of facts must be taken as true.,
Quoting Smith v. State, 581 So.2d 1283, 1284 (Ala. Crim.
App 1991). In addition, his claim is not precluded by any of
the provisions of rule 32.2.5 because his claim is not
barred, is sufficiently pleaded, and is unrefuted by the
state, Poole is entitled to an opportunity to prove his claim.
(ANY AFFIDAVIT , UNREFUTTED, WHETHER IT
CORRESPONDS TO A DEBT OR A RULING, MUST STAND AS
TRUTH)

Unlike our legislative process, whose privileges can only be vested

into a small number of inducted individuals, Common law can be
used, challenged, and debated by anyone who can afford the cost
of court, and can solidify his statements as being true, while those
true statements become a part of common law itself, as decided
by the Supreme Court.

Although, many aspects of Common Law such as Roe v. Wade are

constantly changing due to public opinion, many aspects of
common law remain in the realm of common sense and within
wide scale acceptance. Unlike the Congress or the Senate, the
courts, are bound to law, and must weigh legality in addition to
evidence as to whether or not something stands as truth and is to
be carried on as so. When politicians change the law, it is simply
instituted by a vote, which is often based on solely on popular
opinion or bribery, without judiciously weighing the evidence or
consent from the common man through a Supreme jury.

Writing an affidavit of Truth is an easy and great way to formalize

your status. I will provide a sample copy. As you study this book,
and many others like it, you may decide to alter it and make your
very own stronger affidavit. As your knowledge will slowly
increase, you will learn to sharpen your arguments with precise
case studies and sensible logic.

Secondly, you must learn how to sign your name on documents.

Either next to, or underneath your signature, get into the habit of
writing "All Rights Reserved”. Which basically means that you
agree to the said contract, without giving up your natural rights. If
you are being forced to sign something with the threat of
consequence to do so otherwise, sign it "All Rights Reserved-
Under Duress”. Or simply "Under Duress” if you want to keep it
simple. Under Duress- states that you agree to sign
involuntarily because of a threat, and do not necessarily agree to
the terms.

For practice, I would recommend writing "All Rights Reserved”

anytime you sign ANYTHING, especially if it’s from a government
agency. To have a more professional look, you may even want to
carry a pocket stamp that says "All Rights Reserved”. Ever since
the days of ancient man, a signature has always held a lot of
weight, and the penalties for forging someone else’s signature
have also been just as powerful, as a man’s signature symbolizes
his very being. In many cultures, including America during the
colonial era, signing your name in blood or using a finger print
with blood was used to add even more weight to the signature.
Some today, actually prefer to sign important documents with a
red pen to signify the color of blood for this purpose. However,
simple blue ink will do for most things today, whether it be a
signature or finger print.

Alongside the Affidavit of Truth, you may also decide to carry

separate affidavits for other activities that are regulated in
governmental society. You could create affidavits for your right to
travel, fish, hunt, an Identification Document with a
signature/fingerprint/Photo, and to signify a Cultural/Religious
Declaration of Marriage which will include terms and agreements
created by you and your spouse, not by the state. While all being
notarized of course. When making an Affidavit for Marriage or to
prove your Identity, you may want to include additional lines for
witnesses or third parties who may be included in the affidavit.
For example, if you wanted to create an Identification affidavit,
you could include a photo, a statement stating your name,
physical features, and who gave birth to you. You could include
your finger prints, and a signature from your mother proving that
she gave birth to you and asserts your identity, and finish the
document with a notarized stamp. Who could refute that? Even
though these matters are quite serious, in due time, it becomes
quite fun and empowering taking back your identity and sense of
self ownership. Later I will discuss the UCC and how to sign over
your government strawman (RANDELL D STROUD) back to your
real self, (Randell: Daryl- Stroud). As for now please take a look
at two sample documents that are easy to understand, especially
for beginners.

feel free to copy and print this affidavit. Make several copies to
carry with you, and to submit to any offices or jurisdictions, keep
the original notarized version at home. Feel free to edit this
affidavit, improve it, and add in your own researched statements.

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

( To motion the courts to attempt a rebuttal against the

entirety of this document and all statements made)

1. Be it known to all who call themselves "government,” their

"courts,” agents, and other parties, that I,
_____________________________________________,
am a natural, freeborn sovereign individual, without subjects. I
am neither subject to any entity anywhere, nor is any entity
subject to me. I neither dominate anyone, nor am I dominated.

2. I DO NOT recognize and cannot be held in contempt of any law

that cannot show a named individual victim(s), nor can I held be
liable in contempt of any law that cannot show any property that
has been stolen or damaged from any said individual or
individuals. As the "state” itself is not a person, nor a corporation
itself can be represented as a single person, the state cannot
represent itself as a property holder nor as an individual person
whom is filing a complaint of stolen property or of physical
damage done to itself by a third party. Where no individual victim
and no property stolen or damaged can be found, there can be no
defendant nor prosecutor logically taken into consideration.

3. I am not a "person” as defined in "statutes” when such

definition includes "artificial entities.” I refuse to be treated as a
"federally” or "state” created entity which is only capable of
exercising certain rights, privileges, or immunities as specifically
"granted” by "federal” or "state” "governments.”

4. I may voluntarily choose to comply with the "laws” which

others attempt to impose upon me, but no such "laws,” nor their
"enforcers,” have any authority over me. I am not in any
"jurisdiction,” for I am not of subject status.

5. Unless I have willfully harmed or violated someone or

someone’s property without their consent, I have not committed
any crime, and am therefore not subject to any penalty.

6. Thus, be it known to all, that I reserve my natural right not to

be compelled to perform under any "contract” that I did not enter
into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. Furthermore, I do
not accept the "liability” associated with the compelled and
pretended "benefit” of any hidden or unrevealed "contract” or
"commercial agreement.”

7. As such, the hidden or unrevealed "contracts” that supposedly

create "obligations” to perform, for persons of subject status, are
inapplicable to me, and are null and void. If I have participated in
any of the supposed "benefits” associated with these hidden
"contracts,” I have done so under duress, for lack of any other
practical alternative. I may have received such "benefits” but I
have not accepted them in a manner that binds me to anything.

8. Any such participation does not constitute "acceptance,”

because of the absence of full disclosure of any valid offer, and
voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion. Without
a valid voluntary offer and acceptance, knowingly entered into by
both parties, there is no "meeting of the minds,” and therefore no
valid contract. Any supposed "contract” is therefore void, from the
beginning.

9. From my age of consent to the date affixed below I have never

signed a contract knowingly, willingly, intelligently, voluntarily, and
intentionally whereby I have waived any of my natural inherent
rights, and, as such, take notice that I revoke, cancel, and make
void from the beginning my signature on any and all "contracts,”
"agreements,” "forms,” or any "instrument” which may be
construed in any way to give any agency or department of any
"government” any "authority,” "venue,” or "jurisdiction” over me.

1-A : Typical examples of such compelled and pretended

"benefits” are:

1. 1. "Birth Certificate”: The fact that a "birth

certificate” was issued to me by a local hospital or
"government” agency when I was born, is irrelevant to my
sovereignty. No status, high or low, can be assigned to
another person through a piece of paper, without the
 recipient’s full knowledge and consent. Therefore, such a
piece of paper provides date and place information only. It
indicates nothing about "jurisdiction,” nothing about
property ownership, nothing about rights, and nothing
about subject status. The only documents that can have
any significance, as it concerns my status in society, are
those which I have signed as an adult, with full knowledge
and consent, free from misrepresentation, duress or
coercion of any kind. The issuance of a Birth Certificate
directly violates the 13THAmendment of the US
Constitution. The numbers displayed on the back of the
social security card represents that the said person is
property of a Reserve Bank. When people’s very lives are
made into contracted bonds or collateral, it is
internationally recognized as "slavery”. Furthermore the
numbers found on the Birth Certificate also cite a
connection with the Federal Reserve bank and can be
issued as a collateral bank note/Bond, which constitutes as
another entity having ownership over another human life
i.e. "Slavery”. According to Black’s Law dictionary, slavery
is defined as, : A person who is wholly subject to the will
of another; one who has no freedom of action, but whose
person and services are wholly under the control of
another.

Webster:. One who Is under the power of a master, and who

belongs to him ; so that the master may sell and dispose of his
person, of his industry, and of his labor, without his being able to
do anything, have anything, or acquire anything, but what must
belong to his master. Civ. Code La. art. 35.

Furthermore, I cannot find any justification in having a Birth

Certificate that is issued and owned by a bank or corporate entity,
nor can I find legal justification that does not violate the 13th
Amendment, to allow for the taxation of labor or to restrict a
business from allowing a man born in the land mass known as
"The United States” from working in his business without a
government issued Social Security Card or government issued
Birth Certificate.

1. The use of national currency to discharge my

debts: I have used these only because there is no other
widely recognized currency. For the courts to ask me to
pay them in Federal Reserve notes is in direct violation of
Article I section X Clause I, which states that only gold and
silver can be legal tender. For the courts to ask me to pay
with anything other than such is treasonous.
2. The use of a bank account: If there is any hidden
"contract” behind an account, my signature therewith
gives no validity to it. The signature is only for verification
of identity. I cannot be obligated to fulfill any hidden or
unrevealed "contract” whatsoever, due to the absence of
full disclosure and voluntary consent. Likewise, my use of
the bank account is due to the absence of an alternative.
To not use any bank at all is very difficult and impractical.
3. The use of a "driver’s license”: There is no real need
for me to have such a "license” for travelling in a car.
However, if I am stopped for any reason and found to be
without a "license,” it is likely I would be unduly harassed
and penalized. Therefore, under duress, I carry a "license”
only to avoid extreme inconvenience. ‘Driving’ is defined
as engaging in commerce on the highway. i.e. buying and
selling. like a taxi or delivery driver for example, so if one
does not engage in commerce there is no need for any
license, or indeed any license available to travel as it
would be equivalent to requiring permission to engage in
the lawful activity of travelling. Travelling is not defined.

"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to
transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by
automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or
permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the
right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thompson v.
Smith, 154 SE 579.

1. "State plates” on my car: Similarly, if I have

"registered” my car with the "state” and carry the "state
plates” on it, I have done so under duress only because to
have any other "plates” or no "plates” at all, causes me to
run the risk of "police officer” harassment, imprisonment
and extreme inconvenience. As gasoline taxes pay for the
highways, I have a free right to travel and cannot be
charged a fee for something that I have already paid into.
 1. The use of a "passport”: There is no real need for me to
have a "passport” (or other associated "permits,” "visas,”
etc.) to travel. I have the right to travel without hindrance,
wherever, however, and whenever I wish, so long as I do
not encroach upon the private property of others. Though
without a "passport,” my right to travel is unduly hindered.
Therefore, under duress, I only use a "passport” to
prevent extreme inconvenience and to ensure that I can
travel from one "country” to another at all.

1. Past "filing” of "tax returns”: Because such "tax

returns” were "filed” under threat, duress, and coercion,
and no two-way contract was ever signed with full
disclosure, there is nothing in any past "filing” of "tax
returns” or payments that created any valid contract.
Therefore, no obligation on my part was ever created.

"There is a clear distinction in this particular case between an

individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to
refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the
suit of the State. The individual may stand upon his constitutional
rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business
in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no
such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom,
beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such
as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the
organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due
process of law, and in accordance with the constitution. Among
his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of
himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a
warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he
does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43
at 47 (1905).

1. Past "enrolment” and "voting”: Similarly, since no

obligation to perform in any manner was ever revealed in
print, as part of the "requirements” for the supposed
"privilege” to "enroll” and "vote,” any such "enrolment” or
"voting” does not oblige me to do anything, nor grant any
"jurisdiction” over me to anyone.

1. "Citizenship”: Any document I may have ever signed, in

which I answered "yes” to the question, "Are you a [insert
name of "country" here] citizen?” – cannot be used to
compromise my status as a sovereign, nor obligate me to
perform in any manner. This is because without full written
disclosure of the definition and consequences of such
supposed "citizenship,” provided in a document bearing my
signature given freely without misrepresentation or
coercion, there can be no binding contract.

I am not a "[insert name of "country" here] citizen.” I am not a

"resident of,” an "inhabitant of,” a "franchise of,” a "subject of,” a
"ward of,” the "property of,” the "chattel of,” or "subject to the
jurisdiction of” any "monarch” or any corporate "commonwealth,”
"federal,” "state,” "territory,” "county,” "council,” "city,” "municipal
body politic,” or other "government” allegedly "created” under the
"authority” of a "constitution” or other "enactment.” I am not
subject to any "legislation,” department, or agency created by
such "authorities,” nor to the "jurisdiction” of any employees,
officers, or agents deriving their "authority” therefrom. Nor do any
of the "statutes” or "regulations” of such "authorities” apply to me
or have any "jurisdiction” over me.

Further, I am not a subject of any "courts” or bound by

"precedents” of any "courts,” deriving their "jurisdiction” from said
"authorities.” Take notice that I hereby cancel and make
void from the beginning any such "instrument” or any presumed
"election” made by any "government” or any agency or
department thereof, that I am or ever have voluntarily elected to
be treated as a subject of any "monarch” or a "[insert name of
"country" here] citizen,” or a "resident” of any "commonwealth,”
"state,” "territory,” "possession,” "instrumentality,” "enclave,”
"division,” "district,” or "province,” subject to their "jurisdiction(s).”

10. Use of semantics: There are some immature people with

mental imbalances, such as the craving to dominate other people,
who masquerade as "government,” and call the noises and
scribbles that emanate from their mouths and pens "the law”
which "must be obeyed.” Just because they alter definitions of
words in their "law” books to their supposed advantage, doesn’t
mean I accept those definitions. The fact that they define the
words "person,” "address,” "mail,” "resident,” "motor vehicle,”
"driving,” "passenger,” "employee,” "income,” and many others, in
ways different from the common usage, so as to be associated
with a subject or slave status, means nothing in real life.

Because the "courts” have become entangled in the game of

semantics, be it known to all "courts” and all parties, that if I have
ever signed any document or spoken any words on record, using
words defined by twists in any "law” books different from the
common usage, there can be no effect whatsoever on my
sovereign status in society thereby, nor can there be created any
"obligation” to perform in any manner, by the mere use of such
words. Where the definition in the common dictionary differs from
the definition in the "law” dictionary, it is the definition in the
common dictionary that prevails, because it is more trustworthy.

11. Such compelled and supposed "benefits” include, but are not
limited to, the aforementioned typical examples. My use of such
alleged "benefits” is under duress only, and is with full reservation
of all my natural inherent rights. I have waived none of my
intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use thereof. Furthermore, my
use of such compelled "benefits” may be temporary, until
alternatives become available, practical, and widely recognized.

12: My affidavit, unrefuted , stands as truth.

"Court of appeals may not assume the truth of allegations in a

pleading which are contradicted by affidavit.

Where affidavits are directly conflicting on material points. It is

not possible for the district judge to "weight” the affidavits in
order to resolve disputed issues; except in those rare cases where
the facts alleged in an affidavit are inherently incredible, and can
be so characterized solely by a reading of the affidavit, the district
judge has no basis for a determination of credibility.” – Data Disc,
INC v. System Tech Assocs., Inc 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977)

"Moreover, Poole’s claim is sufficiently pleaded to satisfy the

pleading requirements in Rule 32.3 and Rle 32.6(b), and his
factual allegation were unrefuted by the state; therefore, they
must be accepted as true.” See Bates v. State, 620 So.2d 745.
746 (Ala.Crim.App 1992) (* When the States does not respond to
a petitioners allegations, the refuted statement of facts must be
taken as true.,

Quoting Smith v. State, 581 So.2d 1283, 1284 (Ala. Crim. App
1991). In addition, his claim is not precluded by any of the
provisions of rule 32.2.5 because his claim is not barred, is
sufficiently pleaded, and is unrefuted by the state, Poole is
entitled to an opportunity to prove his claim.

12B: REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY

1.I hereby revoke, rescind, cancel, and make void from the
beginning, all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in
"law” or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it
pertains to any "tax file/identification number” and/or "social
security number” assigned to me, as it pertains to my "birth
certificate,” and as it pertains to any and all other numbers,
"licenses,” "certificates,” and other "instruments” issued by any
and all "government” and quasi-”governmental” departments or
agencies, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said
agencies to attempt to deprive me of my sovereignty and/or
property.

2.I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly

accept any alleged "benefit” or "gratuity” associated with any of
the aforementioned numbers, "licenses,” "certificates,” and other
"instruments.” My use of any such numbers, "licenses,”
"certificates,” or other "instruments” has been for information
purposes only, and does not grant any "jurisdiction” to anyone.
3.I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or
otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in "law” or
otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it
pertains to any and all property, real or personal, corporeal or
incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole
and absolute owner and possess allodial title to any and all such
property.

4.Take notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void from the
beginning all powers of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or
otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on
my behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney
pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited
to, any and all quasi/colorable, public, "governmental”
departments, agencies or corporations on the grounds of
constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent
facts.

5.I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that
I am competent to make this Affidavit. I hereby affix my own
signature to all of the affirmations in this entire document with
explicit reservation of all my inalienable rights and my specific
right not to be bound by any "contract” or "obligation” which I
have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, intentionally, and
without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.

The use of notary below is for identification only, and such use
does not grant any "jurisdiction” to anyone.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.

Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights

reserved,

(Printed Name:)________________________________.
Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding
Sui Juris.

Signed:_________________________________

Date:___________________________________
On this ________day of______________, ______, before me,
the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
________________________, personally appeared the above-
signed, known to me to be the one whose name is signed on this
instrument, and has acknowledged to me that she/he has
executed the same.

Signed:_______________________________________

Printed Name:__________________________________

Date:_________________________________________

Source: http://sovereigntactics.org/?page_id=103

Category: Articles | Added by: JennaRose (2013-02-20)

Views: 20613 | Comments: 40 | Rating: 5.0/2

Total comments: 8
Comments display order: By default
8 Eugenesaw (2024-04-29 3:15 AM) 0
Hello dear friend, I would like to offer placement of your link (or
links) on different platforms of the internet such as: forums,
blogs, comments and much more. . .

Increase your Visibility Boost Your Seo Rank - Get Organic Traffic
From Google. Ranking in Google isn’t hard. All you need is a
healthy number of backlinks from referring domains that have
authority and trust in Google’s eyes.

This Backlinks Service Benefits:

1. Easily get Google rankings

2. Get a lot of traffic from Google

3. You can earn from the website in different ways

4. Increase Domain Authority (DA)

Quality guaranteed !

PRICE - 20$
 WebSite - https://goo.su/CHM5cJW

7 Elizabeth Dailey (2023-12-16 4:45 AM) 0

Can somebody who is currently incarcerated file an affidavit?

6 harunaminurasyid (2023-02-13 12:09 PM) 0

I love so much with this writing Exclaiming your

Sovereignty, and Making Your Case.

5 Sue (2017-11-28 3:07 AM) 0

how do I use this information?
do i just print and add my name , then get it notarized by public
notary?

4 Without Prejucdice Ken Rich (2015-12-16 11:09 0

AM)
Thank you for this great work, and I will use it if and when I need
it. Bless you

3 christopher g (2015-08-14 1:52 AM) 0

Could make an affidavit of truth for marriage licenses?

2 herurico (2014-12-24 8:57 PM) 0

Good research

1 chris duvall All Rights Reserved (2014-11-25 7:08 0

AM)
Thank you for this information. It was most helpfull.

Name *:

Email *:

Code *: I'm not a robot

reCAPTCHA
Privacy - Terms

Add comment

Copyright MyCorp © 2024 Create a free website with uCoz