INSTITUTO MEDIO POLITÉCNICO DE

MAPUTO - iMEP

Nível e Titulo de Qualificação: CV3 Curso: Civil Construction

Título do Módulo: CIRTL Código do módulo: MO HG023002
Nome do Estudante: Código do Estudante:
Instrumento da Avaliação Sumativa n°: 1 (Única) Resultado de Aprendizagem n°: 1,2,3
Avaliação: 1ª Reavaliação: 2ª Reavaliação: Data:
Feedback do Avaliador: Resultado da Avaliação:
____________
Assinatura do Avaliador: Data: __/ /2024
Assinatura do Estudante: Data: __/ /2024
Assinatura de Verificador Interno: Data: __/ /2024

Oral English Evaluation

Learning 1. Exchange opinions and report facts related to the work;
outcomes 2. Prepare to use English Language orally in specific vocational content
in a work-related scenario;
3. Use English Language orally in a work-related scenario.
Performance 1. a) Makes simple statements and requirements related to your own work;
criteria b) Asks questions and gives answers about his work and others.
c) Performs and participates in simple work conversations.
2. A) Identifies the objective of the oral announcement;
b) Identifies the context of the communication;
c) Identifies specialized definitions and meanings.
3. A) Uses appropriate rhetorical structure;
b) Uses understandable pronunciation;
c) Uses appropriate nonverbal tips;
d) Uses appropriate strategies to interact with others to achieve results in the
workplace.

Oral Presentation: Observation Checklist

Demonstration assessment (Oral evaluation)
Criteria Check if Comments / Score
observed feedback

Organization
Introduction and statement of purpose were included.
Ideas were organized in a meaningful way.

1 Oral Evaluation based on interaction – produced by dr. GARCIAS

IMEP – Instituto Medio Politécnico de Maputo
Necessary background information was provided.
A strong conclusion was included.

Content
Topic was clearly defined and explained.
Main points were clearly presented.
Details to support main points were included.
Appropriate vocabulary was used.
Speaker was well informed on the topic.
Speaker stayed focused on the topic.

Delivery
Volume was appropriate for the audience.
Enunciation was clear and precise.
Speech was appropriately paced.
Speaker maintained frequent eye contact.
Body language was not too relaxed or stressed.
Speaker was sensitive to audience reaction, adapted if
necessary.
Presentation Support
Speaker used appropriate visual aids and supports.
Visual aids and supports were integrated in presentation.
Pronunciation, spelling, intonation, grammar were
accurate.
Overall presentation was enthusiastic and effective

/ 80% recommended percentages

Additional comments:

The end!

2 Oral Evaluation based on interaction – produced by dr. GARCIAS

IMEP – Instituto Medio Politécnico de Maputo