Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Long and Winding Road: Exploring The Landscape of Digitisation in (Higher) Music Education
The Long and Winding Road: Exploring The Landscape of Digitisation in (Higher) Music Education
Prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, we launched a call to map the
Share ! " #
landscape of ongoing digitisation projects. The call, inviting to provide information on
existing digitisation projects through a questionnaire, was sent to all members of AEC
and of partner organisations EAS and EMU, and was also distributed widely using the Translate webpage
team’s other networks. Evidently, the advent of COVID-19 has drastically changed the English
situation, boosting digitisation in unforeseen ways. Indeed, in the wake of the lockdown,
an avalanche of tools, strategies and re]ections have been shared and discussed on
websites, on social media (public) and in institutions (private). In a previous post, we
have already shared some re]ections on this.
The COVID-19 crisis forced the implementation of strategies that may or may not be
used in the future. In other words, this crisis is pushing HMEIs further in digitisation at all
different levels. In this way, COVID-19 has acted as a catalyst for the progression of
digitisation.
In summary, music schools and conservatories will change after this crisis, digitising
activities related to research, teaching/learning and administration. But digitisation is
not easy. It is a process that must be designed according to individual institutional
requirements and it can never be carried out in a fully effective way in an emergency
situation.
In this post, we present the overall research and explain how the Wrst set of labels have
been designed.
Goals
This work of the group aims to map how digitisation has permeated HMEIs. To do so, we
designed a questionnaire, inviting students, teachers and administration staff to share
information about digital projects they have been involved in. Based on this information,
we will establish a conceptual framework that allows mapping the current landscape of
Digitisation in (Higher) Music Education and, in this way, building an understanding of the
why, what and how of digitisation.
To establish this framework, we adopt two strategies. A Wrst strategy is top down. Here,
we use existing categories to organise the different projects according to their function,
social role and accessibility. A second strategy is bottom up. Here, information about the
goals and the expected results of each submitted project was transformed into a series
of keywords. Next, these keywords were translated into a series of categories.
Both strategies will lead to creating the envisaged framework, which – according to us –
may help institutions to understand the opportunities and challenges of digitisation and,
consequently, to walk the long and winding road of digitisation.
Please note that the goal of this framework is not to impose a certain road but to help
institutions choose which road to take.
We believe that systematic re]ection based on these three sets of labels, can help with
creating a speciWc digitisation plan beyond individual tools. For instance, perhaps some
institutions already have a digital solution for the administrative coordination of
internationalisation processes, but they need to optimise the aspects related to the
dissemination of the artistic results of these international collaborations (perhaps
synchronously). This is just a simple example, but it illustrates how different viewpoints
may help decision-making in relation to the digitisation roadmap. In the next sections, we
elaborate on the different labels.
Artistic: Initiatives using digital tools in the creative process, digital musical
instruments, digital artifacts in live performances, etc.
Learning/teaching: Initiatives related to the teaching/learning process itself, such
as the use of LMS, publication of Master Classes, using digital tools in the
classroom, etc.
Research: Initiatives for developing and showing results of research projects
carried out by the institution, such as the elaboration of online questionnaires,
paper publications, call for collaborations, etc.
Administrative: Initiatives related to the administration of the institution such as the
grading process, Erasmus management, social networks, etc.
Mobile: Initiatives accessible outside the institution, usable with mobile devices,
etc.
Visual: Initiatives including photo, video, FaceTime, etc.
Digital: Initiatives using LMS (Moodle, Blackboard, etc.), digital recordings, scores in
PDF format, etc.
Global: Initiatives developed in collaboration with other musicians/music educators
or institutions all over the world.
Synchronous: Initiatives allowing more than 1 person synchronously connected at
the same time.
On the web: Initiatives using web based softwares/applications (YouTube,
SoundCloud, Doodle, Google Calendar…) for developing the project/practice or
disseminating its results.
Social: Initiatives in which sharing content on social networks is a part.
Open: Initiatives in which anyone can access and/or support accessibility facilities
Massive: Initiatives beneWting from the participants’ contribution by using blinded
peer evaluation, artiWcial intelligence, etc.
Figure 1: Three dimensional cube with each of the presented set of labels on each axis
access, case study, digital tools, digitisation, distance learning, education, information, learning, learning and
teaching, models, society, strategy, tools
! Inclusiveness
Entrepreneurial mind-set for
musicians
Internationalisation and
transnational mobility
Learning and Teaching
Digitisation
Student involvement in HME
Early Childhood Music
Education