Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes-CI-2016-Unit 4
Notes-CI-2016-Unit 4
Notes-CI-2016-Unit 4
CONTEMPORARY INDIA:AN
OVERVIEW
CLASS NOTES: UNIT 4 (BAJMC103)
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the
document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the
contents of the document.]
1.Marginalization, Socio-Economic
Equality and Reservation
In the last unit we had discussed Indian Economy. In Unit 4 of the course
"Contemporary India: An Overview", we shall discuss major issues and concerns of
India as a whole. Over the four lessons of this unit we shall discuss issues such as
Marginalization, Socio-Economic Equality, Reservation; Women Safety, Gender
Equality, Activism; Public Health, Hygiene & Sanitation: Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan;
Judicial Activism.
In the present lesson of this unit we shall study about marginalization, socio-economic
equality and reservation.
_
1.0 Objectives
After reading this lesson you will be able to:
Describe rationale behind marginalization,
Understand socio-economic equality and reservation in India.
1.1 Introduction
Marginalisation affects millions of people throughout the world. The living
condition of marginalized population is very poor. Due to some social
circumstances, they are unable to fulfill their basic needs like shelter, even one
time of food, poor health condition. In common language, they are known as
economically weaker section or below poverty line people. This has a negative
impact on development of human beings, as well as on society at large. As the
objective of development is to create an enabling environment for people to
enjoy a productive, healthy, and creative life, it is important to address the issue
of marginalization. The government has taken number of initiatives to uplift
these population upto mainstream population. In this section we will understand
the various rationale behind the marginalization, their socio-economic condition
and reservation policies and other initiatives taken by the governments.
1.2 Marginalization
Marginality is a living condition that affects millions of people throughout the
world. People who are marginalized have relatively little control over their lives
and the resources available to them. This results in making them handicapped
in earning their share from the society. A vicious circle is set up whereby their
lack of positive and supportive relationships means that they are prevented from
participating in local life, which in turn leads to further isolation. This has a
tremendous impact on development of human beings, as well as on society at
large. As the objective of development is to create an enabling environment for
people to enjoy a productive, healthy, and creative life, it is important to address
the issue of marginalization.
Social justice and equality are complementary to each other so that both should
maintain their vitality. The constitution commands justice liberty, equality and
fraternity as supreme values to usher in the egalitarian social economic and
political democracy. Social justice equality and dignity of person are corner
stone of social democracy.
The concept of social justice which the democracy of India engrafted consists of
diverse principles essential for the orderly growth and development of
personality of every citizen. Rule of law therefore, is a potent instrument of social
justice to bring about equality in results.
1.3 Socio-Economic Equality
Socio-economic inequality is a great issue in India. It is a hurdle in economic
development and also a cause of marginalization. The following issues can be
considered as main cause in socio-economic inequality:
The main factors affecting the population change are the birth rate, death rate
and migration. The birth rate is the ratio between births and individuals in a
specified population and time. The death rate is the ratio between the number
of deaths and individuals in a specified population & Migration is the number of
people moving in (immigration) or out (emigration) of a country, place or locality.
The population change is calculated by the formula:
The recent increase in the population has been caused due to the following
major reasons:
b. Religious beliefs, Traditions and Cultural Norms: India‘s culture runs very
deep and far back in history. A lot of families prefer having a son rather than a
daughter. As a result, a lot of families have more children than they actually want
or can afford, resulting in increased poverty, lack of resources, and most
importantly, an increased population. Another one of India‘s cultural norms is for
a girl to get married at an early age. In most of the backward areas and
communities, families prefer to get their girls married at the age of 14 or 15.
Although child marriage is illegal in India, the culture and the society surrounding
the girls in India does not allow them to oppose such decisions taken by their
family.
1.3.2 Illiteracy
India has a vast population and to capture the potential demographic dividend,
to remove the acute regional, social and gender imbalances, the government is
committed to make concerted efforts for improving the quality of education as
mere quantitative expansion will not deliver results in view of fast changing
domestic and global scenario.
To meet the objectives mentioned above, the Ministry's endeavor has been to
achieve "Education for All" with an inclusive approach. Elementary education
comprising primary and upper primary, forms the foundation of the education
pyramid. Hence, to strengthen this foundation and to achieve the goal of
universal access to quality education for all, the Right of Children to Free and
Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009 became operative on April 1, 2010.
Further to enhance enrolment, retention and attendance and simultaneously
improving nutritional levels among children, the major intervention includes
'National Program of Mid-Day Meal (MDM) in schools'. At the same time, the
Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) is being implemented to achieve the goals of
universal access and retention, bridging of gender and social gaps in enrolment
levels and enhancement of learning levels of children.
1.3.3 Poverty
Poverty is one of the main issues, attracting the attention of sociologists and
economists. It indicates a condition in which a person fails to maintain a living
standard adequate for a comfortable lifestyle. Though India boasts of a high
economic growth, it is shameful that there is still large scale poverty in India.
Poverty in India can be defined as a situation when a certain section of people
are unable to fulfill their basic needs. Most of them are daily wagers, landless
laborers and self-employed house holders. There are a number of reasons for
poverty in India. Poverty in India can be classified into two categories namely
rural poverty and urban poverty. It is a condition of an individual in which his
income is so low that he is unable to feed or provide shelter for himself and his
family members. Those who do not have such income are called poor. Poverty
is also an inability to earn sufficient income to arrange two square meals a day
for him as well as family members. So, they are considered to live below poverty
line. In the urban poverty is the result of migration of rural people to urban areas
for work and wages. They have in slum areas in unhygienic condition. Extensive
unemployment is also responsible for urban poverty. On the basis of human
factor, poverty cannot be measured only on economic terms, It should also be
measured terms of deprive So, human poverty can be measured on the basis
of three elements of human life- Longevity, knowledge and decent standard of
living. In this sense, human poverty is denial of tolerable life.
More fundamental has been the economic development and social mobility of those
groups officially designated as Backward Classes and Scheduled Castes. The
Backward Classes and Scheduled Castes, or Dalits as they prefer to be called,
constitute a diverse range of middle, lower, and outcaste groups who have come to
wield substantial power in most states.
India‘s social structure is best understood in terms of caste system wherein the
cast is hierarchically arranged. Over the years, the caste system developed into
an elaborate system to maintain socio-economic inequalities in the society.
Individuals born in and belonging to the lower castes and the out-castes suffered
from many disadvantages and were oppressed and exploited by the upper
castes. The conditions of the outcast is (Dalits) was particularly pathetic. The
practice of untouchability epitomized their conditions.
The socio-religious movements of the 19th century had made the lower castes
conscious of their backward conditions and also of their rights that had been
denied to them over the centuries. As a result, many amongst them were no
longer prepared to accept their inferior status as divinely ordained. In the
backdrop of this awakening, the introduction of democratic principle of
governance, the emergence of party-centered politics and the attempt of the
British rulers to mobilize the lower and the out-castes along with the Muslims in
its support to thwart the growing national movement — all combined to prepare
the ground for the politicization of the castes. By the time India gained
Independence, the backward classes, because of politicization, had become a
force to reckon with.
1.4 Reservation
Reservation in India is always controversial, and a debate head for all aware
and educated people in India. Although, it provides facilities to a small group of
people, on the basis of caste and religion, yet it also creates dis-satisfaction in
a comparatively larger group of the discriminated people. The demand for
reservation is spreading like a viral disease among the Indian mass. The most
depressing aspect of reservation is that it is going to be a lethal risk for the unity
and dignity of India. It is shameful that political parties make it their election
agenda for their personal benefits. The demand for reserving seats in jobs, both
in government as well as private sector, on the basis of caste, religion, minority
and domicile is increasing day by day, among the Indian mass. The recent
Gurjar (Gujjar) upheaval in Rajasthan and Patel in Gujarat is one of the lustrous
examples of it.
The history of the current reservation system goes back to 1882, under the
British rule, when Jyotirao Govindrao Phule (Mahatma Jyotiba Phule) made a
demand of free and compulsory education for all along with proportionate
reservation and representation in government jobs. But The demand for
reservation of government jobs was made as early as 1891 with an agitation in
the princely State of Travancore against the recruitment of non-natives into
public service overlooking qualified native people. After that this trend started in
the princely states of Baroda, Kolhapur, Mysore and some others, one after
another.
Reservations were introduced in favour of a number of castes and communities
that had little share in the administration by the British in the year of 1908. But
the official provisions for reservation were introduced in the Government of India
Acts of 1909 and 1919. Communal Reservations were first introduced in Madras
Presidency in 1921, in which reservation of 44 percent for non-Brahmins, 16
percent for Brahmins, 16 percent for Muslims, 16 percent for Anglo-Indians and
Christians and eight per cent for Scheduled Castes were distributed. This gave
breath to communalism in India for the first time.
In 1947, the great years of Indian freedom, the newly implemented constitution
of India prohibits discrimination on the grounds caste, race, religion, sex and the
place of birth, and provide equality of opportunity to all Indian citizens. But on
the other hand, it contains special clauses for the advancement of any socially
and educationally depressed classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes
and the Scheduled Tribes. Separate constituencies allocated to scheduled
castes and tribes to ensure their political representation for 10 years. But
subsequently this time limit is being extended for every 10 years through various
constitutional amendments. After the independence of India, many commissions
and committees were established to review this situation in which Khalelkar
Commission (1953) and Mandal Commission (1979) are remarkable. Mandal
Commission was established to assess the situation of the socially and
educationally backward. Mandal Commission submitted a report in 1980 and
recommended changes to the existing quotas, increasing them from 22% to
49.5%.
As of 2006 number of castes in Backward class list went up to 2297 which is the
increase of 60% from community list prepared by Mandal Commission. Mandal
commission recommendations were implemented in Government Jobs in the
year of 1990, during the Congress Government. In 1991, Government
introduced 10% separate reservation for Poor among Forward Castes. In 1995,
a permitting reservation in promotions to the Schedule Castes and Schedule
Tribes was introduced through constitutional amendment.
In the year of 1998, Central Government conducted large nationwide survey for
the first time to estimate economical and educational status of various social
groups. National surveys indicated that the status of OBC is comparable to
forward castes in many areas. In 2005 reservation ensured to OBC, SC and ST
in Private Educational Institutions through the 93rd Constitutional amendment.
Reservation was introduced for other backward classes in Central Government
Educational Institutions in the year of 2006. Thus the total reservation went up
to 49.5 percent. But the Supreme Court, in 2007, gave stay on OBC reservation
in Central Government Educational Institutions. In 2008, The Supreme Court
upheld the Government‘s move for initiating 27% OBC quotas in Government
funded institutions.
The goal of reservation in India has been to bring about an improvement in the
welfare who, have been economically, socially, mentally and educational
depressed. But, in arriving at this judgement about who should be eligible for
reservation, the criterion has been a person‘s caste rather than his income or
wealth. In practice, a large number of persons, who are really backward, couldn‘t
be regarded as backward. Thus many of the benefits of reservation have been
captured by well-off groups from the depressed persons and comparatively
poorer ungrouped persons, who are not categorized in these so called
backwards, have failed to benefit. I personally know many of such persons in
my hometown, who have a rather good education and economic condition but
they are all having benefits of various government schemes for backwards.
For changing these graphs, the government, and the officials and of course, the
people should try to change their attributes towards reservations. The
government should concentrate on the modest improvements of the educational
level of Scheduled Castes, Schedule Tribes, and Other Backward Classes.
Because these backward groups would be class-educated, they will be selected
for the jobs without any Reservation, on their own behalf, both in Government,
as well as Private Sector. All political parties should prohibit the reservation as
their election agenda, as it intends to increase the communalism and tension in
between the people of various states. The only thing we need is honest effort to
solve this issue, which India is struggling with, for more than a century.
India is a developing country with over 1.25 billion people living in it. The
condition of India after 65 years of independence has moved at a sluggish pace
that is considering a move. Corruption, population explosion, inefficiency,
unemployment are at its highest and now to pass a bill allowing provision for job
promotion quota to the under privileged is as good as opening another gold mine
for loot.
All economic policies give rise to gainers and losers. And ‗Pareto Improvement‖
tells us that if the gainers gain more than the losers, then it is theoretically
possible for the gainers to compensate for the losses incurred by the losers.
Thus both the gainers and losers are at a better position than before and this is
an economically efficient policy but on the other hand if the losers lose more
than the gainers have gained then the economy policy has failed and there is
an overall loss. And this is what we are heading at today.
Any policy which is based on differentiation will give rise to two distinct groups,
one who will benefit from the policy which in this case are the people belonging
to the scheduled tribe and scheduled class and the others who feel they are
losing out on their natural birth rights and their opinions are going to clash
against each other. And to judge the effectiveness of this policy one just cannot
see the benefits incurred by one group and the losses by another but also from
a neutral point of view and how the change is going to affect the economy of the
country.
We can also see how the recently passed women‘s bill, providing a certain fixed
number of women representatives in the parliament has proved to be ineffective.
There are now constituencies that are only reserved for women. Hence if there
is a well deserving male candidate for the same post he will not be selected
because it has been reserved for women. Here we again see, the big picture is
lost amidst much cry and hype. Yes women representation is required within the
parliament, but not at the cost of quality functioning of the parliament.
We can see how reservation policies have gone all wrong. Today there are
reservations for schedules castes, scheduled tribes, Muslims, Christians and
the percentage seems to be increasing. One can see this as a deliberate attempt
of the government to keep the people of India from uniting and maintaining of
communal differences. It is through standing on our shoulders they seem to be
noticed among the crowd.
1.5 Summing Up
Keeping in mind the backward conditions of the backward classes, the
constitution makers also made special provisions for the upliftment of the
backward classes. The special provisions are in the form of protective
discrimination. The policy of reservation is an instance of protective
discrimination. The goal of reservation in India has been to bring about an
improvement in the welfare who, have been economically, socially, mentally and
educational depressed. But, in arriving at this judgement about who should be
eligible for reservation, the criterion has been a person‘s caste rather than his
income or wealth. In practice, a large number of persons, who are really
backward, couldn‘t be regarded as backward.
1.6 Assignments
Class Assignment: Write short notes on:
(1) Poverty (2) Reservation for OBCs.
Home Assignment: Write a brief on reservation policy of India.
3. The Union govt. has reserved jobs for people belonging to OBCs.
Explain the concept of reservations for equal progress of all sections of the
society.
1.9 Possible answers of self-check questions
1. Planning Commission.
2. Longevity, knowledge and decent standard of living.
3. 27%.
4. Three.
1.10 Keywords
1.11 References
1. India.gov.in
2. Jagranjosh.com
In this lesson we will study the Lesson 2: Women Safety, Gender Equality and Activism.
2.0 Objectives
After going through this lesson you should be able to:
• Describe Gender Inequality
• Describe measures to resolve Gender Inequality
2.1 Introduction
Man and woman are both equal and both plays a vital role in the creation and
development of their families in a particular and the society in general. Indeed,
the struggle for legal equality has been one of the major concerns of the
women‘s movement all over the world. In India, since long back, women were
considered as an oppressed section of the society and they were neglected for
centuries. During the national struggle for independence, Gandhi gave a call of
emancipation of women. He wrote – I am uncompromising in the matter of
women‘s rights. The difference in sex and physical form denotes no difference
in status. Woman is the complement of man, and not inferior‖. Thus, the first
task in post-independent India was to provide a constitution to the people, which
would not make any distinctions on the basis of sex. The preamble of
constitution promises to secure to all its citizens- ―Justice - economical, social,
and political‖.
The constitution declares that the equality before the law and the equal
protection of laws shall be available for all. Similarly, there shall be no
discrimination against any citizen on the ground of sex. Article 15(1) guarantees
equalities of opportunities for all citizens in matters of employment. Article 15(3)
provides that the state can make any special provisions for women and children.
Besides, directive principle of state policy which concern women directly and
have a special bearing on their status directly and have a special bearing on
their status include Article 39(a) right to an adequate means of livelihood; equal
pay for equal work both men and women, protection of health and strength of
workers – men, women, children and Article 42 provides for just and humane
conditions of work and maternity relief.
2.2 Women Safety
The condition of women in India has always been a matter of grave concern.
Since the past several centuries, the women of India were never given equal
status and opportunities as compared to that of their male counterparts. 99
Even in today's times of modernization of society, many working women are still
subjected to immense pressure to shoulder the dual responsibility of a
housewife and a working woman simultaneously with little or no help from their
husbands.
It is the same mentality which, some generations ago, used to think of women
as mere objects of attaining sexual pleasure and a servant of the husband, who
was considered "parameshwar" which literally translates to "supreme God".
The recent incident in which a 23 year old paramedical student was gang-raped
by 6 men inside a moving bus near a posh Delhi locality and thrown off the bus
naked after herself and her male friend were beaten and assaulted with an iron
rod has undoubtedly shocked the nation to its core.
This was reflected in the massive protests that followed the incident, demanding
justice for the victim, who unfortunately succumbed to the damage caused by
her body by the assault (a major part of her intestines had to be removed due to
the spread of gangrenous infection) in a hospital in Singapore.
Although it was a most heinous case of cruelty, it is ironical to note that such
incidents are not actually rare in our country. There are several such cases
happening everyday where females (from infants to old ladies, from upper
middle class women in metro cities to women in villages….the list can be
endless) are subjected to horrendous sexual torture by lustful men who are, in
most cases, known to the victims. One cannot generalize the victims or those
guilty of sexual crimes in India; they come from all strata of society and from
every part of India and belong to all the age groups.
Making stringent laws is necessary to ensure that the guilty in such cases get
the punishment that they deserve and don't walk freely due to the weak
provisions or loopholes of the existing laws. But asserting that stringent laws will
be able to curb male sexual overdrive in India cannot be justified.
Unlike the cases of sexual molestation registered in police stations, there is a
large portion of women in India who are subjected to rape and other forms of
sexual assault on a daily basis and still their cases go unnoticed.
Another category of such women who are bound to indulge in sexual activities
against their wishes are the hundreds of thousands of sex workers in India who
are visited by numerous men every day and even tortured by many of their
clients. They are compelled to do as their clients say as they have no other
means of feeding themselves and their children other than selling their bodies
to the sex-hungry men of India.
If we take account of all these women and then collectively see the scenario of
sexual crimes against women, it can be easily seen that stringent laws alone
cannot do much. What really needs to be done is the moral overhauling of the
minds of the masses by means of education and awareness.
Strong and stringent laws are definitely necessary as the existing laws have
proved to be inefficient in ensuring swift justice and appropriate punishment to
the guilty. But the actual need of the hour is a revolutionary change in the
mindsets and conscience of Indian men so that they stop seeing women as
objects of sexual pleasure.
2.3 Gender Equality and Activism
‗Gender‘ is a socio-cultural term referring socially defined roles and behaviors
assigned to ‗males‘ and ‗females‘ in a given society; whereas, the term ‗sex‘ is
a biological and physiological phenomenon which defines man and woman. In
its social, historical and cultural aspects, gender is a function of power
relationship between men and women where men are considered superior to
women. Therefore, gender may be understood as a man-made concept, while
‗sex‘ is natural or biological characteristics of human beings.
The word gender refers to the socio-cultural definition of man and woman, the
way societies distinguish men and women and assign them social roles. The
distinction between sex and gender was introduced to deal with the general
tendency to attribute women's subordination to their anatomy. For ages it was
believed that the different characteristics, roles and status accorded to women
and men in society are determined by sex, that they are natural and therefore
not changeable.
Gender is seen closely related to the roles and behavior assigned to women and
men based on their sexual differences. As soon as a child is born families and
society begin the process of gendering. The birth of the son is celebrated, the
birth of a daughter filled with pain; sons are showered with love, respect, better
food and proper health care. Boys are encouraged to be tough and outgoing;
girls are encouraged to be homebound and shy. All these differences are gender
differences and they are created by society. Gender inequality is therefore a
form of inequality which is distinct from other forms of economic and social
inequalities. It dwells not only outside the household but also centrally within it.
It stems not only from pre-existing differences in economic endowments
between women and men but also from pre-existing gendered social norms and
social perceptions.
Gender inequality has adverse impact on development goals as reduces
economic growth. It hampers the overall wellbeing because blocking women
from participation in social, political and economic activities can adversely affect
the whole society. Many developing countries including India have displayed
gender inequality in education, employment and health. It is common to find girls
and women suffering from high mortality rates. There are vast differences in
education level of two sexes. India has witnessed gender inequality from its early
history due to its socio-economic and religious practices that resulted in a wide
gap between the position of men and women in the society.
The origin of the Indian idea of appropriate female behavior can be traced to the
rules laid down by Manu in 200 B.C.: "by a young girl, by a young woman, or
even by an aged one, nothing must be done independently, even in her own
house". "In childhood a female must be subject to her father, in youth to her
husband, when her lord is dead to her sons; a woman must never be
independent." Women's lives are shaped by customs that are centuries old.
"May you be the mother of a hundred sons" is a common Hindu wedding
blessing.
Women face discrimination right from the childhood. Gender disparities in
nutrition are evident from infancy to adulthood. In fact, gender has been the most
statistically significant determinant of malnutrition among young children and
malnutrition is a frequent, direct or underlying, cause of death among girls below
age 5. Girls are breast-fed less frequently and for a shorter duration in infancy.
In childhood and adulthood, males are fed first and better. Adult women
consume approximately 1,000 fewer calories per day than men according to one
estimate. Nutritional deprivation has two major consequences for women: they
never reach their full growth potential, and suffer from anemia, which are risk
factors in pregnancy. This condition complicates childbearing and results in
women and infant deaths, and low birth weight infants.
The tradition also requires that women eat last and least throughout their lives
even when pregnant and lactating. Malnourished women give birth to
malnourished children, perpetuating the cycle. Women receive less healthcare
facilities than men. A primary way that parents discriminate against their girl
children is through neglect during illness. As an adult they tend to be less likely
to admit that they are sick and may wait until their sickness has progressed far
before they seek help or help is sought for them. Many women in rural areas die
in childbirth due to easily preventable complications. Women's social training to
tolerate suffering and their reluctance to be examined by male personnel are
additional constraints in their getting adequate health care.
2.3.1 Provision in Indian Constitution
The Constitution of India ensures gender equality in its preamble as a
fundamental right but also empowers the state to adopt measures of positive
discrimination in favor of women by ways of legislation and policies. India has
also ratified various international conventions and human rights forums to
secure equal rights of women, such as ratification of Convention on elimination
of all forms of discrimination against women in 1993. Women have been finding
place in local governance structures, overcoming gender biases. Over one
million women have been elected to local panchayats as a result of 1993
amendment to the Indian Constitution requiring that 1/3 rd of the elected seats
to the local governing bodies be reserved for women. The passing of Pre-natal
Diagnostic Tech Act in 1994 also is a step in removing gender discrimination.
This Act seeks to end sex-determination tests and female foeticide and prohibits
doctors from conducting such procedures for the specific purpose of determining
the sex of the fetus.
2.3.2 Government Policies
The Government also announced the National policy for empowerment of
women in 2001 to bring out advancement, development and empowerment of
women. The Government has also drawn up a draft National policy for the
empowerment of women which is a policy statement outlining the state's
response to problems of gender discrimination. As persistent gender inequalities
continue we need to rethink concepts and strategies for promoting women's
dignity and rights. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has stated, "Gender
equality is more than a goal in itself. It is a precondition for meeting the challenge
of reducing poverty, promoting sustainable development and building good
governance." There is a need for new kinds of institutions, incorporating new
norms and rules that support equal and just relations between women and men.
Today women are organizing themselves to meet the challenges that are
hampering their development.
It is really important to note that though the Constitution of India is working since
more than fifty-seven years – the raising of the status of women to one of
equality, freedom and dignity is still a question mark In India, since
independence, a number of laws have been enacted in order to provide
protection to women. For instance the Dowry prohibition Act 1961, The Equal
Remuneration Act 1986, The Hindu Marriage Act 1956, The Hindu Succession
Act 1956, The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, the
commission of Sati (prevention) Act 1987, Protection of the Women from
Domestic Violence Act 2005, etc. But, the laws have hardly implemented in their
letter and spirit.
The sense of insecurity, humiliation and helplessness always keep a women
mum. Our whole socialization is such that for any unsuccessful marriage which
results in such violence or divorce, it is always the woman, who is held
responsible. Cultural beliefs and traditions that discriminate against women may
be officially discredited but they continue to flourish at the grass root levels.
Family relations in India are governed by personal laws. The four major religious
communities are – Hindu, Muslim, Christian and Parsi each have their separate
personal laws. They are governed by their respective personal laws in matters
of marriage, divorce, succession, adoption, guardianship and maintenance. In
the laws of all the communities, women have fewer rights than that of man in
corresponding situations. It is really that women of the minority communities in
India continue to have unequal legal rights and even the women of the majority
community have yet to gain complete formal equality in all aspects of family life.
This is basically the problem of gender inequality. But what is this problem and
how this can be solved.
2.4 Gender Inequality
Gender Inequality, in simple words, may be defined as discrimination against
women based on their sex. Women are traditionally considered by the society
as weaker sex. She has been accorded a subordinate position to men. She is
exploited, degraded, violated and discriminated both in our homes and in
outside world. This peculiar type of discrimination against women is prevalent
everywhere in the world and more so in Indian society.
Gender Inequalities refers to the obvious or hidden disparities among individuals
based on the performance of gender. This problem in simple term is known as
Gender Bias which in simple terms means the gender stratification or making
difference between a girl and a boy i.e. a male or a female. In making biasness
among the gender India is ranked 10th out of 128 countries all over the world
which is shameful for us. But this problem is increasing although government
has banned the pre-natal sex examination. In India (in the older times) this
problem is mainly seen in the rural areas because many rural people think that
the girl child is burden on them.
But now this is also being seen in the urban areas i.e. in offices, institutions,
schools and in society. However, inequality between men and women can take
very many different forms. Indeed, gender inequality is not one homogeneous
phenomenon, but a collection of disparate and interlinked problems. The issue
of gender inequality is one which has been publicly reverberating through
society for decades. The problem of inequality in employment being one of the
most pressing issue today.
As a result of this gender bias, the mortality rates of females often exceed those
of males in these countries. In some regions in the world, inequality between
women and men directly involves matters of life and death, and takes the brutal
form of unusually high mortality rates of women and a consequent dominance
of men in the total population, as opposed to the preponderance of women found
in societies with little or no gender bias in health care and nutrition. Mortality
inequality has been observed extensively in North Africa and in Asia, including
China and South Asia.
2.4.1 Types of Gender Inequality
There are many kinds of gender inequality or gender disparity which are as
follows:
1. Nativity inequality: In this type of inequality a preference is given for boys
over girls that many male-dominated societies have, gender inequality can
manifest itself in the form of the parents wanting the newborn to be a boy
rather than a girl.
2. Professional or Employment inequality: In terms of employment as well as
promotion in work and occupation, women often face greater handicap than
men. A country like Japan and India may be quite egalitarian in matters of
demography or basic facilities, and even, to a great extent, in higher
education, and yet progress to elevated levels of employment and
occupation seems to be much more problematic for women than for men.
The example of employment inequality can be explained by saying that men
get priority in seeking job than women.
3. Ownership inequality: In many societies the ownership of property can also
be very unequal. Even basic assets such as homes and land may be very
asymmetrically shared. The absence of claims to property can not only
reduce the voice of women, but also make it harder for women to enter and
flourish in commercial, economic and even some social activities. This type
of inequality has existed in most parts of the world, though there are also
local variations. For example, even though traditional property rights have
favored men in the bulk of India.
4. Household inequality: There are often enough, basic inequalities in gender
relations within the family or the household, which can take many different
forms. Even in cases in which there are no overt signs of anti-female bias in,
say, survival or son-preference or education, or even in promotion to higher
executive positions, the family arrangements can be quite unequal in terms
of sharing the burden of housework and child care.
5. Special opportunity inequality: Even when there is relatively little difference
in basic facilities including schooling, the opportunities of higher education
may be far fewer for young women than for young men. Indeed, gender bias
in higher education and professional training can be observed even in some
of the richest countries in the world, in India too.
2.4.2 Causes of Gender Inequality
The root cause of gender inequality in Indian society lies in its patriarchy system.
According to the famous sociologists Sylvia Walby, patriarchy is ―a system of
social structure and practices in which men dominate, oppress and exploit
women‖. Women‘s exploitation is an age old cultural phenomenon of Indian
society. The system of patriarchy finds its validity and sanction in our religious
beliefs, whether it is Hindu, Muslim or any other religion.
For instance, as per ancient Hindu law giver Manu: ―Women are supposed to
be in the custody of their father when they are children, they must be under the
custody of their husband when married and under the custody of her son in old
age or as widows. In no circumstances she should be allowed to assert herself
independently‖.
The above described position of women as per Manu is still the case in present
modern day social structure. Barring few exceptions here and there, women
have no power to take independent decisions either inside their homes or in
outside world. In Muslims also the situation is same and there too sanction for
discrimination or subordination is provided by religious texts and Islamic
traditions. Similarly in other religious beliefs also women are being discriminated
against in one way or other. The unfortunate part of gender inequality in our
society is that the women too, through continued socio-cultural conditioning,
have accepted their subordinate position to men. And they are also part and
parcel of same patriarchal system.
Extreme poverty and lack of education are also some of the reasons for
women‘s low status in society. Poverty and lack of education derives countless
women to work in low paying domestic service, organized prostitution or as
migrant laborers. Women are not only getting unequal pay for equal or more
work but also they are being offered only low skill jobs for which lower wages
are paid. This has become a major form of inequality on the basis of gender.
Educating girl child is still seen as a bad investment because she is bound to
get married and leave her paternal home one day. Thus, without having good
education women are found lacking in present day‘s demanding job skills;
whereas, each year‘s High School and 10+2 standard results show that girls are
always doing better than boys. This shows that parents are not spending much
after 10+2 standard on girl child and that‘s why they lack in job market.
So the inequality or discrimination against women is at various levels in the
society, either in home or outside home.
The meaning and Definition of social justice in the reference of the equality:
Socialist writer-define, social justice, in term of need. Need these two criteria
can be put under to concepts of equality -
1. Formal equality means that law is treats everyone equal and does not favour
anyone either because he belongs to the advantage section of the society or
disadvantage section of the society.
2. Concept of proportional equality - Expects the state to take affirmative action
in favors of disadvantage section of the society within the frame work of liberal
democracy. Constitution of India, articles 14 & 16 equality-violation gives grant
of discretionary powers. The basic principal under laying Art.14 is that the law
must be operating all people equally on all people under like circumstances.
Every discretionary power is not necessarily discriminatory. Equality is not
violated by mere conferment of discretionary power. It is violated by arbitrary
exercise by those whom it conferred. In M. Nagraj vs. Union of India, Supreme
Court held that, Social justice is one of the sub-divisions of the concept of justice.
It is concerned with the distribution of benefits
2.4.3 Measures to Resolve Gender Inequality
1. Changes at District level mechanism: A clear cut administrative should be
made available at the district level for monitoring and reviewing the incidence of
inequality against women. This district level machinery headed by District
Magistrate should consist of representatives of police, prosecution machinery,
judiciary and the representatives of prominent individuals of women‘s
organizations in the Districts. This committee should review progress of
investigation and prosecution. At least one special cell should be created at the
district level for ensuring better registration and progress of investigation and
monitoring of crimes against gender equality. This special cell should network
with community groups and women‘s organizations and help to create an
atmosphere in which people would feel encouraged to freely report the cases of
gender injustice. At present, most, non-reporting of the cases is due to lack of
confidence in enforcement machinery.
The reporting of violence against women from the Thana to the district level and
from district level to the state level gets obscured in the overall mass and
complexities of the currently prescribed reporting system. Specific format should
be created and implemented for reporting on gender-related crimes.
2. Changes at State level Mechanism: Similarly, like District level mechanism
there should be State level machinery at the State level in which there should
be special entry for those cases which needs prompt actions. This institution will
make a full control over the district level machinery. To rule out the possibility of
corruption or fraud involved innocent persons.
3. Sensitization of Criminal Justice system: The police officers, prosecutors, and
judges at all levels of hierarchy need to be exposed to the gender equality
education which would enlighten them on existing assumptions, myths and
stereotypes of women and how these can interfere with fair and equitable
administration of justice. Judicial system should comprise of all types of officers
i.e. from judiciary i.e. judges, police officers and which should take immediate
action in serious cases.
4. Family Law: Another of wrong is family law also. In this accused can be
punished under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and Dowry Prohibition Act, 1987
other laws relating to family disputes. The suit/ case can be filed for domestic
violence or any other household wrong.
It has been shown that law is strictly restricted in it capacity to deliver gender
justice, which in itself is contingent on the nature of law and it‘s functioning. In
this connection it is worthwhile to recall that the law itself is not a monolithic
entity, which simply progresses or regresses. Historically, the development of
law has been an uneven one. That is to say, more than not, what law promises
on paper cannot carry through in reality. That is why law-as-legislation and law-
in-practice are most of the time in contradiction with each other. To cite an
example, the Indian constitution explicitly enshrines formal equality for women.
However, the lives and experiences of India women relentlessly continue to be
characterized by substantive inequality, inequity and discrimination.
Gender justice may not be then that much of a caste in the sky. Finally, one
must at least clearly suggest what ought to be done. The present feminist
analysis is such a modest endeavour which not only attempts to understand the
reality but also tries to explain how to change it.
―Fight for gender equality is not a fight against men. It is a fight against traditions
that have chained them – a fight against attitudes that are ingrained in the
society – it is a fight against system – a fight against proverbial Laxshman Rekha
which is different for men and different for women. The society must rise to the
occasion. It must recognize & accept fact that men and women are equal
partners in life. They are individual who have their own identity‖.
2.4.4 Leading measures taken by the government for reducing gender
inequality
1. Focused implementation of Prime Minister Jan Dhan Yojana
7. Plantation of saplings
2.5 Summing Up
Man and woman are both equal and both plays a vital role in the creation and
development of their families in a particular and the society in general. Indeed,
the struggle for legal equality has been one of the major concerns of the
women‘s movement all over the world. In India, since long back, women were
considered as an oppressed section of the society and they were neglected for
centuries. During the national struggle for independence, Gandhi gave a call of
emancipation of women. He wrote – I am uncompromising in the matter of
women‘s rights. The difference in sex and physical form denotes no difference
in status. Woman is the complement of man, and not inferior‖. Thus, the first
task in post-independent India was to provide a constitution to the people, which
would not make any distinctions on the basis of sex. The preamble of
constitution promises to secure to all its citizens- ―Justice - economical, social,
and political‖.
The patriarchal nature of Indian society, which even though gives respect to
women as they are our mothers and sisters, has greatly hampered both the
independence as well as the safety of women.
One of the main reasons of violence against women is the mentality which
deems women inferior of men and merely limits their importance to the
maintenance of the household, the upbringing of children and pleasing their
husbands and serving other members of the family.
Gender Inequalities refers to the obvious or hidden disparities among individuals
based on the performance of gender. This problem in simple term is known as
Gender Bias which in simple terms means the gender stratification or making
difference between a girl and a boy i.e. a male or a female.
2.6 Assignment
Class Assignment: Explain the measures to resolve gender inequality in India
Home Assignment: Explain types of gender inequalities.
2.10 Keyword
Nativity inequality: In this type, a preference is given for boys over girls that
many male-dominated societies have, gender inequality can manifest itself in
the form of the parents wanting the newborn to be a boy rather than a girl.
3. Public Health, Hygiene and Sanitation:
Swachh Bharat Abhiyan
In the last session we had studied the Lesson 2 Women Safety, Gender Equality and
Activism. In which had discussed about various issues and causes related to women
safety, gender equality and measures taken by the government for reducing gender
inequality.
In the present session we will study the Lesson 3 Public Health, Hygiene and
Sanitation: Swachh Bharat Abhiyan
3.0 Objective
3.1 Introduction
Public Health programs are primarily the responsibility of the state government,
but the union government provides the finance for improvements in public health
services. The structure of the health system is based on a network of primary
health centers.
The value of healthy choices has been known to people living in Indian
subcontinent since antiquity. Ayurveda (science of life) is one of the oldest
healthcare systems that take a holistic view of the physical, mental, spiritual and
social aspects of human life, health and disease. While Indian systems have
been effective in preventing healthcare, there are emergency situations where
one require surgical procedures. Management of diseases and patient care may
need different approach and solutions.
Public health in India suffers from many problems which includes insufficient
funding, shortage of facilities leading to overcrowding and severe shortage of
trained health personnel. There is also lack of accountability in the public health
delivery mechanisms. These are some of the reasons which have placed India
at the lowest rank in the Human Development Index. India however holds top
position in migration of physicians to developed countries like UK and the US.
According to Planning Commission the country has a shortfall of six lakh doctors,
10 lakh nurses and two lakh dental surgeons. This has led to a dismal patient-
doctor ratio in the country. For every 10,000 Indians, there is just one doctor.
At the time of the independence, very few modern health care services were
available. People depended on locally available traditional knowledge. State of
public health was very low. All the population based health indicators, i.e. life
expectancy, IMR, MMR, morbidity and mortality due to infectious and
communicable diseases were highly unsatisfactory.
Poor nutrition, unsafe drinking water, poor hygiene and living conditions
contributed to poor state of public health.
Road traffic injuries are increasing sharply. Injuries and diseases of the
musculoskeletal system account for more than 20% of patient visits to primary
care.
The dramatic achievements of Public Health in the 20th century have improved
our quality of life: an increase in life expectancy, worldwide reduction in infant
and child mortality, and the elimination or reduction of many communicable
diseases.
In 1999, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention named the ten greatest
public health achievements of the 20th century. These advances have been
largely responsible for increasing the lifespan of populations; over twenty-five of
the 30 years can be accredited to public health initiatives, while medical
advances account for less than 4 years.
Today, Public Health leaders continue to strengthen their roles as advocates for
improved population-based health in an international, global community through
various measures taken by the government of India such as:
6. Safer and healthier food - Safer and healthier foods have resulted from
decreases in microbial contamination and increases in nutritional content.
Identifying essential micronutrients and establishing food-fortification programs
have almost eliminated major nutritional deficiency diseases such as rickets,
goiter, and pellagra in the United States.
7. Healthier mothers and babies - Healthier mothers and babies are a result
of better hygiene and nutrition, availability of antibiotics, greater access to health
care, and technologic advances in maternal and neonatal medicine. Today
infant mortality has decreased 90%, and maternal mortality has decreased 99%.
India's first 'National Health Policy' was formulated in 1983 and second in 2003.
The main objective of this policy was to achieve an acceptable standard of good
health. The NHP 2002 noted that the Central Government will have to play a
key role in augmenting public health investments as the State Governments
were in difficult fiscal situation. This policy further envisaged a key role for the
Central Government in designing national programs with the active participation
of the State governments.
The much publicized National Urban Health Mission (NUHM) is yet to see the
light of day. The scheme plans to monitor and improve the health of 22 crore
people living in urban slums in 429 cities and towns. It was to be launched mid
2008 but the mission is yet to become functional. NURM is aimed at providing
accessible, affordable, effective and reliable primary health care facilities
especially to urban poor.
NRHM was launched in April 2005 with the objective of providing accessible,
affordable and quality healthcare to the rural population. Most prominent
features of NRHM are involvement of communities in planning and monitoring,
provision of untied grants to the health facilities and the communities annually,
placing a trained female health activist in each village for 1000 population known
as Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) to act as a link between the public
health system and the community and bottom-up planning. Under the NRHM
the following interventions have been initiated:
• Mother and Child Tracking System (MCTS): Tracking of pregnant mothers and
children has been recognized as a priority area for providing effective healthcare
services. Mother and Child Tracking system (MCH) is a name based pregnant
mother and child tracking system.
PMSSY was launched in 2006 with the objective of correcting the imbalance in
availability of affordable/reliable tertiary level healthcare in the country in-
general and to augment facilities for quality medical education in the under-
served states.
AYUSH has presence in all parts of the country. It has near universal
acceptance, available practitioners and infrastructure. The strength of AYUSH
system lies in preventive & promotive health care, diseases and health
conditions relating to women and children, non-communicable diseases, stress
management, palliative care, rehabilitation etc. AYUSH has very little side effect,
has a soft environmental footprint and is engrained in local temperament.
The rural and urban both public health care system in many States and regions
is in an unsatisfactory state leading to victimization due to expensive private
sector health care.
Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) have shown
downward trend, yet the rate of improvement has to be two to three times that in
the past so as to attain the monitorable goals.
Health is a state subject. All stakeholders need to co-operate and communicate
for efficient and effective management of the program. Managerial capacity of
the Health program managers need to be strengthened, upgraded and
modernized.
The respective role of the public and private sectors in health care has been a
key issue in debate over a long time. With the overall swing to the Right after the
1980s, it is broadly accepted that private provision of care should take care of
the needs of all but the poor. By doing so, risk pooling arrangements should be
made to lighten the financial burden on theirs who pay for health care. As regards
the poor with priced services. Taking into account the size of the burden, the
clinical and public health services cannot be shouldered for all by government
alone. To a large extent this health sector reform m India at the state level
confirms this trend.
The distribution of the burden, between the two sectors would depend on the
shape and size of the social pyramid in each society. There is no objection to
introduce user fees, contractual arrangements, risk pooling, etc. for mobilization
of resources for health care. But, the line should be drawn not so much between
public and private roles, but between institutions and health care run as
businesses or run in a wider public interest as a social enterprise with economic
dimensions.
Following the Gandhian ideal of ‗sanitation for all‘, in its biggest and most recent
cleanliness drive, the Government of India launched the ‗Clean India Campaign‘,
popularly known as the ‗Swachh Bharat Mission‘ to make India open defecation
and filth free by 2019.
The Abhiyan was launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 2nd of October,
2014 at Rajghat, New Delhi with an aim to make India clean. Aim is to provide
sanitation facilities to every family, including toilets, solid and liquid waste
disposal systems, village cleanliness, and safe and adequate drinking water
supply by 2nd October, 2019. It will be a befitting tribute to the Father of the
Nation on his 150th birth anniversary. It is significant that the PM himself is
taking very proactive role in making the campaign a success; at Rajghat he
started the campaign by cleaning the street himself.
However, it has been clearly declared that the campaign is not only the duty of
the Government but each and every citizen of the country is equally responsible
to keep the nation clean or swachh.
The core intent of the Swachh Bharat Mission is to make India open defecation
free by 2019. Keeping public spaces clean, constructing and maintaining both
individual and community toilets are all part of the ‗Swachh‘ agenda.
The Swachh Bharat Mission (Gramin) is the successor of the erstwhile Nirmal
Bharat Abhiyan (NBA). The aim of the NBA, earlier known as the Total
Sanitation Campaign, was to make India open defecation free by 2017.
The campaign of clean India movement is the biggest step taken ever as a
cleanliness drive till date. On the day of launch of campaign around 3 million
government employees including students from schools and colleges had
participated in the event to make it popularize globally and make common public
aware of it. This event was organized at Rashtrapati Bhavan on 2nd of October
in 2014 in the presence of 1500 people. This event was flagged off by the Indian
President, Pranab Mukherjee.
Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, had nominated the name of nine famous
personalities from business industries, sports and Bollywood to drive the clean
India campaign. He also had requested from all nine personalities to invite
another nine personalities individually and requested to continue the chain nine
people to take this campaign to every Indian living in any corner all around the
country.
Narendra Modi has said that this campaign should be taken as the big challenge
and must pass the request to invite other nine people individually (just like
branching of tree) so that this vision of cleanliness may be completed till 2019
and may India become a clean country forever in the history.
By getting inspired from this Indian campaign, the Indo Nepal Doctors
Association has launched a campaign called ―Swachh Bharat Nepal – Swasth
Bharat Nepal Abhiyan‖ on 3rd of January in 2015. It was started from the Indo-
Nepal Border Region, Sunauli – Belihiya (near birth place of Lord Buddha, holy
city of Lumbini, Nepal).
Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) was started in 2012 and then Swachh Bharat
Abhiyan in 2014 on 2nd of October. However, all the sanitation and cleanliness
programmes run by the Indian government earlier were not as effective as the
current Swachh Bharat Abhiyan of 2014.
The ‗Clean India: Clean Schools‘ campaign aims to ensure that all schools in
India have functional and hygienic water supply and sanitation facilities. Through
this mission, children are expected to be educated about the benefits of hand
washing and the positive effects good personal hygiene has on health and
wellness.
Improved levels of hygiene in schools directly impacts the health and wellbeing
of children, which in turn is responsible for improved attendance and
performance in school. The initiative hopes to showcase children as agents of
change, inspiring parents and relatives to adopt hygienic practices at home and
in the community as a whole.
3.4 Summing Up
Health programs are primarily the responsibility of the state government, but the
Union government provides the finance for improvements in public‘s health
services. The structure of the health system is based on a network of primary
health centers. The value of healthy choices has been known to people living in
Indian subcontinent since antiquity. Ayurveda (science of life) is one of the oldest
healthcare systems that take a holistic view of the physical, mental, spiritual and
social aspects of human life, health and disease. While Indian systems have
been effective in preventing healthcare, there are emergency situations where
one requires surgical procedures. Management of diseases and patient care
may need different approach and solutions. Health is best understood as the
indispensable basis for defining a person's sense of wellbeing. The health of
populations is a distinct key issue in public policy discourse in every mature
society often determining the deployment of huge society. They include its
cultural understanding of ill health and well-being, extent of socio-economic
disparities, reach of health services and quality and costs of care.
3.5 Assignments
Class Assignment: Describe the Public Health in India.
Home Assignment: Explain Swachh Bharat Abhiyan and its components.
3.9 Keywords
MMR: Maternal Mortality Rate.
IMR: Infant Mortality Rate
CSR: Corporate Social Responsibility
In the last session we had studied the Lesson 3 Public Health Hygiene and Sanitation:
Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. In which we had discussed about various issues of public
health in India, awareness on hygiene and sanitation especially Swachh Bharat
Abhiyan initiated by Pradhan Mantri Narendra Modi.
4.0 Objectives
After going through this lesson you should be able to:
• Describe Judicial Activism
• Describe Indian Judicial System
4.1 Introduction
We already know that the India is a democratic country and is based on the
strong three pillars such as Legislative body, Executive body and Judiciary.
Indian constitution provides well defined rights and duties to all the three bodies
mentioned. But now it is seen that Indian Judiciary undertaken number of such
cases, which are normally comes under legislative or executive body‘s
jurisdiction. This lesson will discuss on judicial activism which is a burning issue
in these days.
The other theory of ―social want‖ says that people want something which is
neither provided by the executive or the legislative. So judiciary took it upon
itself to provide the wants of the people. So it became proactive and this pro-
activeness is called as judicial activism. Judicial activism has its genesis in the
American system. The American system of governance has favored an active
judiciary because they follow the principle of judicial supremacy unlike our
constitutional supremacy. So in America the judiciary has the supreme power
to review any act of legislature. This favored for a proactive judiciary. But in
India, though there is no favorable scope of judiciary being proactive, of lately,
it is seen that judiciary is taking interest in many issues which hitherto were not
in its interest.
This simply means that Judiciary in India is becoming activist. The question of
judicial activism is closely related to constitutional interpretation, statutory
construction, and separation of powers. But the point of analysis is how it is
going to affect our democratic principle?
When one talks about the judicial activism in India the following Supreme Court
judgments come to mind –
3. Minerva Mills vs. the union of India and other states: In this case the supreme
court over ruled that amending power is a basic structure of constitution. By this
time the legislative and the judiciary in India were at loggerheads.
4. Sunil Batra vs. Delhi government: In this case Supreme Court reinterpreted
the writ of Habeas corpus as not only producing a person in the court but also
preventing a person jailed from the inhuman treatment in the prison.
5. M. C. Mehta vs. the state of Tamil Nadu: In this case Supreme Court not only
pronounced that deployment of children in hazardous factories is unlawful but
also provided various guidelines for the children welfare.
Apart from the above cases in many landmark judgments Supreme Court
categorically mentioned about environment issues, gender issues and issue
related to dalits etc. The beauties of these cases are all against the legislature.
In each of the cases either some constitutional amendments have been made
void or the law has been reinterpreted differently. In the brief period when
judiciary has been active in India it has garnered the wrath of the legislative and
the executive.
Indian constitution in article 246 speaks about the separation of power between
executive, legislative and judiciary. The idea envisaged in the separation of the
power is not to give rise to a dictatorial regime, because, these three branches
are independent of each other. The separation of power is the essence of Indian
democracy. But an active judiciary in some way or other infringes on the power
of the legislative. One can take the case of the Golaknath case. The
government has made some changes which abridge the fundamental rights and
those changes have been made to enter into the ninth schedule also which is
free of judicial purview. No doubt any law making is the function of the legislative
and as per convention judiciary is to interpret the laws made by the legislative.
But in Golaknath case the Supreme Court quashed the amendment itself. That
means it did not recognize the law made by constitution. No doubt such a law
was to some extent the spirit of the fundamental rights but the act of judiciary
is a clear encroachment upon the legislature. The Kehsavananda Bharti case
is a very important verdict in defining the ambit of judicial activism.
The Supreme Court remains surprisingly silent; of course various justices have
included different things under the basic structure of constitution but there is no
specific benchmark. If one examines all the above cases it is pretty clear that
judicial activism is against the legislative hegemony but the question may arise
is it against democracy? Legislative is a democratic body. It gains the authority
from the people. On the other hand judiciary has no popular mandate backing
it. It is an independent authority. So by principle judiciary ratifying the legislature
is against the principle of democracy. But arriving any such conclusion is not
an easy task. There are many a loopholes in such straight forward criticism.
Suppose the legislature makes the law which affects the liberty of people and
which is a gross violation of human rights.
The assumed principle is that these public representatives should make laws
for the benefit of the people. The loophole in our administration is that it is not
very transparent and popular participation is bare minimum. The prescribed
methods of control on government have been largely unsuccessful. So in such
a situation a vacuum is created in governance i.e. who shall see the validity of
a law. The judiciary as such and by principle cannot act unless an aggrieved
party does not knock its door. Hence this vacuum is substantial. As per the
theory of ―Power vacuum filling‖ some organ has to extend its influence and it
is only natural for judiciary to extend its influence in the sphere.
Many argue that it is against the principle of democracy. May be it is true. But
there is a widening gap between the principle of democracy and the essence
of democracy. Sometimes the hegemonic growth of the form and procedure of
democracy become so vast that they make the spirit of democracy in danger.
Now it is important to decide what is more important the procedure and
principles of democracy like the legislative supremacy or the spirit of democracy
i.e. welfare of people. The principle and procedure may be a means to an end
but the end is always the spirit of democracy. So if means are abridged to attain
the ends then democracy will be more successful than anything else. Judiciary
under the veil of activism serves as a watch dog for preserving this basic spirit
of democracy.
The Public Interest Litigations (PIL) is one of the important tools through which
judicial activism become popular and effective. Earlier a case can be filed by a
person only if he had a locus standi in the court. But with the provision of PILs
people now know that judiciary has constitutional power of intervention and can
ameliorate their miseries arising out of lawlessness or repression by the
government. To this effect many people and groups have acting pro bono public
has filed PILs on various issues and judiciary has taken steps to mend those
problems. And an active judiciary has gained popular support. Once speaking
about the judicial activism one of the retired Supreme Court judges has said a
proactive judiciary is successful if it draws its support from people.
So much said about the benefits of the active judiciary one cannot entirely
neglect the harmful effects of it as hinted earlier in the present article. An active
judiciary many times infringes upon the legislative and judiciary and that is
strictly against the principle of separation of power. And an active judiciary
disrupts the balance between a democratically elected bodies i.e. the
legislature. There are many criticisms against the active judiciary. The chief
among them are:
2. Secondly it shows the loopholes in our judiciary. Many critics are of the
opinion that the judges become proactive to come to limelight because they
are devoid of limelight compared to the legislature and the executive.
3. There is a great chance of PILs being misused. Anybody can file PILs for
any petty reasons and thereby there will be such huge volumes of litigations
pending on the floor of court that it will one day become unwieldy.
To some extent the above criticisms are correct. But they are fairly
exaggerated. It is argued that judicial activism has made a victim of legislature.
But in a sense it has not only resulted in a pro-active judiciary but also it has
made the legislature and the judiciary more active. Several new legislations
have appeared after the involvement of judiciary. It has also unearthed many
scams like hawala scam, St Kitties scam, scam on distribution of houses and
petrol pumps etc. It has created an environment of transparency and
accountability in the government. It has made the government more responsive
to people. PILs have served as a tool of popular participation in government.
The second criticism that judges crave for limelight also has little credibility,
because as such judges occupy a revered position in the society. However if
ever any judge wants to be in lime light then there is not major sin because after
all he is also a human being, s there is no need to get this problem exaggerated.
Regarding the abuse of PILs the apex court in several of its pronouncements
has categorically mentioned about some guidelines regarding the PILs and their
usages.
So much said, judicial activism is no God. It has its own inherent problems; the
chief among them is any institution usurping the independence of legislature
(albeit to a small extent). However one also needs to see the fact that it also
sees that legislature does not become undemocratic or despotic and the spirit
of democracy that is mass-welfare is achieved. The position of judiciary with
reference to the principle of judicial activism has been quite complex. An active
judiciary is always welcome in a democratic state but there should be a fine
balance between the popularly elected bodies.
4.3 Indian Judicial System
India has a quasi-federal structure with 29 States further sub-divided into about
601 administrative Districts. The Constitution of India is the supreme legal
document of the country. The Indian judiciary is independent of the executive
and legislative branches of government according to the Constitution.
The Judicial system however has a unified structure. There are various levels
of judiciary in India — different types of courts, each with varying powers
depending on the tier and jurisdiction based upon them. They form a strict
hierarchy of importance in order of the courts. The Indian judiciary has a
reputation of being independent and non-partisan. Judges are not appointed on
political considerations. They enjoy a high standing in society.
Supreme Court of India at the top, followed by High Courts of respective states
with district judges sitting in District Courts and Magistrates of Second Class
and Civil Judge (Junior Division) at the bottom. Courts hear criminal and civil
cases, including disputes between individuals and the government.
The Indian Judicial System has the Supreme Court of India at its helm, which
at present is located only in the capital city of Delhi, without any benches in any
part of the nation, and is presided by the Chief Justice of India.
The Supreme Court of India has many Benches for the litigation, and this apex
court is not only the final court of permissible Appeal, but also deals with
interstate matters, and matters comprising of more than one state, and the
matters between the Union Government and any one or more states, as the
matters on its original side. The President of India can always seek consultation
and guidance including the opinion of the apex court and its judges. This court
also has powers to punish anybody for its own contempt.
The largest bench of the Supreme Court of India is called the Constitution
Bench and comprises of 5 or 7 judges, depending on the importance attached
of the matters before it, as well as the work load of the court. The apex court
comprises the full benches of 3 or 5 judges and the divisional benches of 2 and
3 judges.
The Appeals to this court are allowed from the High Court, only after the matter
is deemed to be important enough on the point of law or on the subject of the
constitution of the nation, and is certified as such by the relevant High Court.
In the absence of any certificate from the High Court, a person may, with the
leave of the apex court, appeal to this court, by filing a Special Leave Petition
before the court. A person or body may also file a Writ against the violation of
Fundamental Rights granted under the Constitution of India, with the
permission of the apex court. Certain writs are allowed to be instituted in the
apex court directly, against the orders of the Courts of the Court Martial, and
the Central Administrative Tribunals.
The Supreme Court has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction. Its
exclusive original jurisdiction extends to any dispute between the Government
of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any
State or States on one side and one or more States on the other or between
two or more States, Article 32 of Constitution gives jurisdiction to the Supreme
Court in regard to enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It is empowered to issue
directions, orders or writs, to enforce them. The Supreme Court conferred with
power to direct transfer of any civil or criminal case from one State High Court
to another State High Court or from a Court subordinate to another State High
Court.
The Supreme Court has special advisory jurisdiction in matters which may
specifically be referred to it by the President of India under Article 143 of the
Constitution.
Proceedings in the Supreme Court arise out of the judgments or orders made
by the Subordinate Courts including the High Courts, but of late the Supreme
Court has started entertaining matters in which interest of the public at large is
involved and the Court can be moved by any individual or group of persons
either by filing a Writ Petition at the Filing Counter of the Court or by addressing
a letter to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India highlighting the question of public
importance for invoking this jurisdiction. Such concept is popularly known as
'Public Interest Litigation' and several matters of public importance have
become landmark cases.
4.3.3 High Courts of India
The High Court stands at the head of a State's judicial administration. There
are 18 High Courts in the country, three having jurisdiction over more than one
State. Among the Union Territories Delhi alone has a High Court of its own.
Other six Union Territories come under the jurisdiction of different State High
Courts. Each High Court comprises of a Chief Justice and such other Judges
as the President may, from time to time, appoint. The Chief Justice of a High
Court is appointed by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice of
India and the Governor of the State. The procedure for appointing Judges is the
same except that the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned is also
consulted. They hold office until the age of 62 years and are removable in the
same manner as a Judge of the Supreme Court. To be eligible for appointment
as a Judge one must be a citizen of India and have held a judicial office in India
for ten years or must have practiced as an Advocate of a High Court or two or
more such Courts in succession for a similar period.
Each High Court has power to issue to any person within its jurisdiction
directions, orders, or writs including writs which are in the nature of habeas
corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari for enforcement of
Fundamental Rights and for any other purpose. This power may also be
exercised by any High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to territories within
which the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises for exercise of such power,
notwithstanding that the seat of such Government or authority or residence of
such person is not within those territories.
Each High Court has powers of superintendence over all Courts within its
jurisdiction. It can call for returns from such Courts, make and issue general
rules and prescribe forms to regulate their practice and proceedings and
determine the manner and form in which book entries and accounts shall be
kept. The following Table gives the seat and territorial jurisdiction of the High
Courts.
Jammu & Kashmir 1928 Jammu & Kashmir Srinagar & Jammu
The District Courts of India are the district courts established by the State
governments in India for every district or for one or more districts together taking
into account the number of cases, population distribution in the district. They
administer justice in India at a district level. These courts are under
administrative control of the High Court of the State to which the district
concerned belongs. The decisions of District court is subject to the appellate
jurisdiction of the High court.
The highest court in each district is that of the District and Sessions Judge. The
district court is also a court of Sessions when it exercises its jurisdiction on
criminal matters under Code of Criminal procedure. The district court is
presided over by one District Judge appointed by the state Government. In
addition to the district judge there may be number of Additional District Judges
and Assistant District Judges depending on the workload. The Additional
District Judge and the court presided have equivalent jurisdiction as the District
Judge and his district court.
India has a unified all India Bar and an advocate enrolled with any State Bar
Council can practice and appear in any court of the land including the Supreme
Court of India. However for doing any acting work in the Supreme Court a
qualifying examination (called an ‗Advocate on Record‘ exam) needs to be
cleared.
Foreign lawyers are not permitted to appear in Courts (unless qualified), though
they can appear in arbitrations.
The procedural law of the land as well as most commercial and corporate laws
are modeled on English laws. English case law is often referred to and relied
upon both by lawyers and judges. As in England, a certain class of litigation
lawyers are designated as ―Senior Advocates‖ (equivalent to QCs). They do
not deal with clients directly and take instructions only through
solicitors. Certain lawyers however, follow a mixed practice i.e., both plead and
act in relation to court matters.
4.3.7 Arbitration
In 1996, arbitration got an impetus with the enactment of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act. This is based on the UNCITRAL Model Rules. The earlier
enactment of 1940 was widely considered ineffective. With the enactment of
the new law, arbitration has gained in popularity and is fast becoming the
preferred route for settlement of commercial disputes.
India does not have a separate Arbitration Lawyers Bar. Generally, court
lawyers are engaged for arbitrations that are conducted over the weekends or
after court hours. Often retired High Court or Supreme Court Judges are
appointed as arbitrators.
4.4 Summing up
4.5 Assignments
Home Assignment: Write short notes on Golaknath vs. the state of Punjab
case
"The legal system of a country reflects social' political, economic and culture
characteristics of society." Explain the statement by highlighting Indian Judicial
System.
4.9 Keywords