ARTICLE – 22: EVAUATION OF BID

Quality and Cost Based Selection methodology with 70:30 ratio (70% weightage for technical score and 30% weightage for fina
followed for the bid evaluation

Financial Score = (Minimum Financial Bid/Quoted Amount)x 100

The Final Score for evaluation shall be computed giving 70% weightage to the “Technical score” and 30% weightage to the “Fin
Final Score = 0.7 x Technical Score + 0.3 x Financial Score
The bidder with the highest Final Score (the Successful Bidder) shall be awarded the project at the
Quoted Price in the Financial Bid. The Successful Bidder may be asked for further price negotiation by the UPPCL.

Case 1
Technical Marks 85 90 92 95
Financial Marks 216,300,000.00 206,300,000.00 210,000,000.00 214,500,000.00
Overall
59.5 63 64.4 66.5
64,890,000.00

b=[(Clow/c).X]+[T/Thigh.(1-X)]

Where C=evaluated Bid price

Clow=The lowest of all evaluated Bid price among responsive Bids T= the total Technical
score awarded to the Bid
Thigh=the Technical score achieved by the Bid that was scored best among all responsive
Bids.
X= weightage for the process as specified in Bids

b=[170000000/2463000000]+[85/100][1-100]]

Financial Score
Biddr 1 99 Biddr 1 99
Bidder 2 85 Bidder 2 88

Airtel 200,000,000.00 100% Biddr 1 215000000

ANB 214,300,000.00 93% Bidder 2 206300000

Financial Score 93% 1.04

Technical Score-1 Technical Score
Airtel 90 100 93 69.3
ANB 95 96 94.4
Technical Score-1
Airtel 95 100 96.5
ANB 90 96 91.8
Technical Score-1
Airtel 90 100 93
ANB 90 100 94.4
cal score and 30% weightage for financial score) shall be

core” and 30% weightage to the “Financial Scor

ct at the
gotiation by the UPPCL.

99
203,300,000.00

69.3

Biddr 1 99 Biddr 1 99 Biddr 1 99

Bidder 2 90 Bidder 2 92 Bidder 2 95

Biddr 1 220000000 Biddr 1 225000000 Biddr 1 230000000

Bidder 2 220000000 Bidder 2 221000000 Bidder 2 222000000

1.00 1.02 1.04

30 99.3