Instant Download PDF Microeconomics 5th Edition Besanko Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Microeconomics 5th Edition Besanko
Solutions Manual
Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-5th-edition-besanko-solutions-manu
al/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
Microeconomics 5th Edition Besanko Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-5th-edition-
besanko-test-bank/
Microeconomics 4th Edition Besanko Solutions Manual
besanko-solutions-manual/
Microeconomics 4th Edition Besanko Test Bank
besanko-test-bank/
Economics Of Strategy 5th Edition Besanko Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/economics-of-strategy-5th-
edition-besanko-test-bank/
Microeconomics 5th Edition Hubbard Solutions Manual
hubbard-solutions-manual/
Microeconomics 5th Edition Krugman Solutions Manual
krugman-solutions-manual/
Economics of Strategy 6th Edition Besanko Solutions

Manual
edition-besanko-solutions-manual/
Economics of Strategy 6th Edition Besanko Test Bank
edition-besanko-test-bank/
Microeconomics 5th Edition Krugman Test Bank
krugman-test-bank/
Besanko & Braeutigam – Microeconomics, 5th edition Solutions Manual
Chapter 6
Inputs and Production Functions
Solutions to Review Questions

1. We said that the production function tells us the maximum output that a firm can
produce with its quantities of inputs. Why do we include the word maximum in this
definition?
The production function tells us the maximum volume of output that may be produced
given a combination of inputs. It is possible that the firm might produce less than this
amount of output due to inefficient management of resources. While it is possible to
produce many levels of output with the same level of inputs, some of which are less
technically efficient than others, the production function gives us the upper bound on (the
maximum of) the level of output.
2. Suppose a total product function has the “traditional shape” shown in Figure 6.2.
Sketch the shape of the corresponding labor requirements function (with quantity of
output on the horizontal axis and quantity of labor on the vertical axis).
The labor requirements function, which is the inverse of the production function, tells us
the minimum amount of labor that is required to produce a given amount of output.
30
25
20
15
L
10
5
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Q
3. What is the difference between average product and marginal product? Can you sketch
a total product function such that the average and marginal product functions coincide
with each other?
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 1

The average product of labor is the average amount of output per unit of labor.
Total Product Q
APL  
Quantity of Labor L
The marginal product of labor is the rate at which total output changes as the firm
changes its quantity of labor.
Change in Total Product Q
MPL  
Change in Quantity of Labor L
The total product function in the graph below Q  3L , which is linear, would have the
average and marginal products coincide. In particular, for all values of Q we would have
APL  MPL  3 .
250
200
150
Q
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
L
4. What is the difference between diminishing total returns to an input and diminishing
marginal returns to an input? Can a total product function exhibit diminishing marginal
returns but not diminishing total returns?
With diminishing total returns to an input, increasing the level of the input will decrease
the level of total output holding the other inputs fixed. Diminishing marginal returns to
an input means that as the use of that input increases holding the quantities of the other
inputs fixed, the marginal product of that input will become less and less. Essentially,
diminishing total returns implies that output is decreasing while with diminishing
marginal returns we could have output increasing, but at a decreasing rate as the amount
of the input increases.
It is entirely plausible to have a total product function exhibit diminishing marginal
returns but not diminishing total returns. This would occur when each additional unit of
an input increased the total level of output, but increased the level of output less than the

previous unit of the input did. Essentially, this occurs when output is increasing at a
decreasing rate as the level of the input increases.
5. Why must an isoquant be downward sloping when both labor and capital have positive
marginal products?
If the marginal product of labor is positive, then when we increase the level of labor
holding everything else constant this will increase total output. To keep the level of
output at the original level, we need to stay on the same isoquant. To do so, since the
marginal product of capital is positive we would then need to reduce the amount of
capital being used. So, to keep output constant, when the level of one input increases the
level of the other input must decrease. This negative relationship between the inputs
implies the isoquant will have a negative slope, i.e., be downward sloping.
6. Could the isoquants corresponding to two different levels of output ever cross?
No, as with indifference curves, isoquants can never cross. For example, suppose we
draw isoquants for two levels of output Q1 and Q2 with Q2  Q1 . In addition, suppose
that these isoquants crossed at some point A as in the following diagram.
Capital
C
B A
Q2
Q1
Labor
Because A and B are on Q2, both achieve the same level of output. Since A and C are on
Q1, both achieve the same level of output. This would imply that B and C achieve the
same level of output. However, this is not possible since point C contains more of both
inputs which would achieve a higher level of output. Therefore, isoquants cannot cross.
7. Why would a firm that seeks to minimize its expenditures on inputs not want to operate
on the uneconomic portion of an isoquant?
By operating on the uneconomic portion of an isoquant, the firm would be using a

combination of inputs in which one of the inputs has a negative marginal product, i.e.,
increasing the input decreases the level of total output. At a point such as this, the firm
could increase output by decreasing the level of the input. By decreasing the level of the
input, the firm could decrease total cost. Thus, if a firm were operating on the
uneconomic region of an isoquant it could simultaneously increase output and decrease

total cost. Thus, a cost-minimizing firm would never operate on this portion of an
isoquant because it would always take advantage of this opportunity.
8. What is the elasticity of substitution? What does it tell us?
The elasticity of substitution measures how the marginal rate of technical substitution of
labor for capital changes as we move along an isoquant. Essentially this value tells us the
level of substitutability between capital and labor, i.e., how easily the firm can substitute
capital for labor to maintain the same level of total output.
9. Suppose the production of electricity requires just two inputs, capital and labor, and
that the production function is Cobb–Douglas. Now consider the isoquants corresponding
to three different levels of output: Q = 100,000 kilowatt-hours, Q = 200,000 kilowatt-hours,
and Q = 400,000 kilowatt-hours. Sketch these isoquants under three different assumptions
about returns to scale: constant returns to scale, increasing returns to scale, and decreasing
returns to scale.
Decreasing Returns to Scale
1,000
750
Capital
Q=400,000
500
250
Q=200,000
Q=100,000
-
- 250 500 750 1,000
Labor
With decreasing returns to scale the firm needs to more than double inputs to double
output. Equivalently, doubling inputs less than doubles output.

Constant Returns to Scale
1,000
750
Capital
500
Q=400,000
250
Q=200,000
- Q=100,000
- 250 500 750 1,000

Labor
With constant returns to scale the firms needs to double inputs to double output.
Increasing Returns to Scale

Q=100,000
1,000
Q=200,000
750 Q=400,000
Capital
500
250
-
- 250 500 750 1,000
Labor
With increasing returns to scale the firm needs to less than double the inputs to double the
output. Equivalently, doubling inputs more than doubles output.

Solutions to Problems
6.1 A firm uses the inputs of fertilizer, labor, and hothouses to produce roses. Suppose that
when the quantity of labor and hothouses is fixed, the relationship between the quantity of
fertilizer and the number of roses produced is given by the following table:
a) What is the average product of fertilizer when 4 tons are used?

b) What is the marginal product of the sixth ton of fertilizer?
c) Does this total product function exhibit diminishing marginal returns? If so, over what
quantities of fertilizer do they occur?
d) Does this total product function exhibit diminishing total returns? If so, over what
quantities of fertilizer do they occur?
Q 2200
a) APF    550 .
F 4
Q 2600  2500
b) MPF    100 .
F 65
c) Diminishing marginal returns set in when MPF for some unit is lower than MPF
for the previous unit. This occurs for F  3 .
d) Diminishing total returns set in at the point where total output begins to fall. This
occurs for F  6 .
6.2. A firm is required to produce 100 units of output using quantities of labor and capital
(L, K) = (7, 6). For each of the following production functions, state whether it is possible to
produce the required output with the given input combination. If it is possible, state
whether the input combination is technically efficient or inefficient.
a) Q = 7L + 8K
b) Q = 20√KL
c) Q = min(16L, 20K)
d) Q = 2(KL + L + 1)
a) The input combination gives Q = 97 so it is infeasible.

b) Q = 129.6 which is greater than 100, so feasible, but inefficient.
c) Q = 112 so again feasible but inefficient.

d) Q = 100 therefore the required output is feasible and the input combination is
efficient.
6.3. For the production function Q = 6L2 − L3, fill in the following table and state how much
the firm should produce so that:
a) average product is maximized
b) marginal product is maximized
c) total product is maximized
d) average product is zero
The completed table is shown below:

L Q
0 0
1 5
2 16
3 27
4 32
5 25
6 0
a) You can calculate the average product at each point by just dividing total output
by L. The values obtained are 0,5,8,9,8,5,0. Therefore Average Product is
maximized when L = 3.
b) The marginal product at values 1 through 6 are respectively: 5,11,11,5,–7, –25.
Therefore both the second and the third unit of L give the greatest marginal
increase in output [if you use calculus techniques it can be seen that marginal
product is maximized when L = 2].
c) From the Table it is clear that total product is maximized when L = 4.
d) Average Product will be zero only when Total Product is zero. This happens when
L = 6.

6.4. Suppose that the production function for DVDs is given by Q = KL2 − L3, where Q is the
number of disks produced per year, K is machine-hours of capital, and L is man-hours of
labor.
a) Suppose K = 600. Find the total product function and graph it over the range L = 0 to L =
500. Then sketch the graphs of the average and marginal product functions. At what level
of labor L does the average product curve appear to reach its maximum? At what level
does the marginal product curve appear to reach its maximum?
b) Replicate the analysis in (a) for the case in which K = 1200.
c) When either K = 600 or K = 1200, does the total product function have a region of
increasing marginal returns?
a)
Total Product with K=600
40,000,000
Total Product
30,000,000
20,000,000
10,000,000
-
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Labor
AP and MP with K=600
200000
100000
AP
0
AP/MP
-100000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

-200000
-300000
-400000 MP
Labor
Based on the figure above it appears that the average product reaches its
maximum at L = 300. The marginal product curve appears to reach its maximum
at L = 200.

b)
Total Product with K=1200
300,000,000
Total Product
200,000,000
100,000,000
-
0 500 1000 1500
Labor
AP and MP with K=1200
1000000
500000 AP
0
AP/MP
-500000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

-1000000
-1500000 MP
-2000000
Labor
Based on the figure above it appears that the average product curve reaches its
maximum at L = 600. The marginal product curve appears to reach its maximum
at L = 400.
c) In both instances, for low values of L the total product curve increases at an
increasing rate. For K = 600, this happens for L < 200. For K = 1200, it happens
for L < 400.
6.5. Are the following statements correct or incorrect?

a) If average product is increasing, marginal product must be less than average product.
b) If marginal product is negative, average product must be negative.
c) If average product is positive, total product must be rising.
d) If total product is increasing, marginal product must also be increasing.

a) Incorrect. When MP  AP we know that AP is increasing. When MP  AP we

know that AP is decreasing.
b) Incorrect. If MP is negative, MP < 0. But AP = Q / L can never be negative
since total product Q and the level of input L can never be negative. Thus, MP <
0 < AP, which only implies that AP is falling.
c) Incorrect. Average product is always positive, so this tells us nothing about the
change in total product. Whether or not total product is rising depends on
whether or not marginal product is positive.
d) Incorrect. If total product is increasing we know that MP  0 . If diminishing
marginal returns have set in, however, marginal product will be positive but
decreasing, but that does not preclude MP > 0.
6.6. Economists sometimes “prove” the law of diminishing marginal returns with the
following exercise: Suppose that production of steel requires two inputs, labor and capital,
and suppose that the production function is characterized by constant returns to scale.
Then, if there were increasing marginal returns to labor, you or I could produce all the
steel in the world in a backyard blast furnace. Using numerical arguments based on the
production function shown in the following table, show that this (logically absurd)
conclusion is correct. The fact that it is correct shows that marginal returns to labor cannot
be everywhere increasing when the production function exhibits constant returns to scale.
To develop the answer, suppose that we were initially producing 64 units of steel.
According to the table, we could do this with 8 units of labor and 100 units of capital.
Now, since we have constant returns to scale, if we double the amount of labor and
capital, i.e., L = 16 and K = 200, we can double output, i.e., produce Q = 128 units of
steel.
But notice from the table that the input combination L = 16 and K = 100 results in an
even greater output of Q = 256 units of steel. Thus, by reducing the amount of capital it
uses (from K = 200 to K = 100), holding the quantity of labor fixed, the firm can produce
more output! That is, the marginal product of capital is negative over this range.
We can see the same thing if we start with any other input combination. For example,
suppose the firm is initially producing 4 units of steel using 2 units of labor and 100 units

of capital. Because of constant returns to scale, if we double the amount of labor and
capital, i.e., L = 4 and K = 200, we can double output, i.e., produce Q = 8 units of steel.
But notice from the table that the input combination L = 4 and K = 100 results in an even
greater output of Q = 16 units of steel. Again, by reducing the amount of capital it uses
(holding the quantity of labor fixed), the firm can produce more output. Again, we see
that the marginal product of capital is negative.
The above calculations illustrate that a two-input production function with (a) constant
returns to scale and (b) increasing marginal returns to labor must necessarily imply that
the marginal product of capital is negative. And, of course, if the marginal product of
capital is negative, the firm can expand output by reducing the amount of capital it uses.
It could, theoretically, produce an enormous amount of steel in a backyard blast furnace.
Because this conclusion is absurd, the point of the illustration is that with constant returns
to scale, marginal returns to labor cannot be everywhere increasing. Eventually the law
of diminishing marginal returns must set in.
6.7. The following table shows selected input quantities, total products, average products,
and marginal products. Fill in as much of the table as you can:

The correct answers are shown in bold face red type.
Labor, L Total product, Q APL MPL

0 0 0 ----
1 19 19 19
2 72 36 53
3 153 51 81
4 256 64 103
5 375 75 119
6 504 84 129
7 637 91 133
8 768 96 131
9 891 99 123
10 1000 100 109
11 1089 98 89
12 1152 96 63
13 1183 91 31
14 1176 84 -7
15 1125 75 -51
6.8. Widgets are produced using two inputs, labor, L, and capital, K. The following table
provides information on how many widgets can be produced from those inputs:
a) Use data from the table to plot sets of input pairs that produce the same number of
widgets. Then, carefully, sketch several of the isoquants associated with this production
function.
b) Find marginal products of K and L for each pair of inputs in the table.
c) Does the production function in the table exhibit decreasing, constant, or increasing
returns to scale?
a) Three sample isoquants: red for production of 4 widgets (Q = 4), green for
production of 8 widgets (Q = 8), and blue for production of 12 widgets (Q = 12).
The dots represent particular combinations of inputs.

(4,2)
2
(1,1)
3
1 Q=8
Q=8
Q=4
0
L
1 2 3 4
b) Recall that marginal product of an input, say labor, is given by Q/L. If we

compute the marginal product of labor and capital at any point in the table, we
find that it always equals 2. For example, in moving from input combination (2,2)
to (3,2), we increase output from 8 to 10. Hence, MPL = (10 – 8)/(3 – 2) = 2.
c) From the table, we see that as we increase the quantity of each input by a given
proportion, the quantity produced increases by the same proportion. Hence, in
moving from input combination (1,1) to (3,3), we are tripling the quantity of labor
and capital used. As a result, the quantity of output produced triples as well.
6.9 Suppose the production function for automobiles is where Q is the quantity of
automobiles produced per year, L is the quantity of labor (man-hours) and K is the
quantity of capital (machine-hours).
a. Sketch the isoquant corresponding to a quantity of Q = 100?
b. What is the general equation for the isoquant corresponding to any level of output Q?
c. Does the isoquant exhibit diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution?
a. The Q = 100 isoquant looks like this:

b. We find the general equation of an isoquant for this production function by starting with
the production function and solving for K in terms of L. Thus, since Q = LK, the general
equation of an isoquant for this production function is
The isoquants for this production function exhibit diminishing marginal rate of technical
substitution. We can see this from the graph above which shows that the isoquant is convex to
the origin.
6.10. Suppose the production function is given by the equation Q = L√K. Graph the
isoquants corresponding to Q = 10, Q = 20, and Q = 50. Do these isoquants exhibit
diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution?
7.0
Q=50
6.0
5.0 Q=10 Q=20
Capital
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 20 40 60 80
Labor

Because these isoquants are convex to the origin they do exhibit diminishing marginal
rate of technical substitution.
6.11. Consider again the production function for DVDs: Q = KL2 − L3.
a) Sketch a graph of the isoquants for this production function.
b) Does this production function have an uneconomic region? Why or why not?
a)
50.0
Q=150
40.0
Capital
30.0 Q=100
20.0 Q=50
10.0
0.0
0 10 20 30 40
Labor
b) Because each of these isoquants has an upward-sloping portion beyond some

level of labor, each one does indeed have an uneconomic region.
6.12. Suppose the production function is given by the following equation (where a and b
are positive constants): Q = aL + bK. What is the marginal rate of technical substitution of
labor for capital (MRTSL,K) at any point along an isoquant?
For this production function MPL  a and MPK  b . The MRTSL, K is therefore
MPL a
MRTS L , K  
MPK b
6.13. You might think that when a production function has a diminishing marginal rate of
technical substitution of labor for capital, it cannot have increasing marginal products of
capital and labor. Show that this is not true, using the production function Q = K2L2, with
the corresponding marginal products MPK = 2KL2 and MPL = 2K2L.
First, note that MRTSL,K = L/K, which diminishes as L increases and K falls as we move
along an isoquant. So MRTSL,K is diminishing. However, the marginal product of capital
MPK is increasing (not diminishing) as K increases (remember, the amount of labor is

held fixed when we measure MPK.) Similarly, the marginal product of labor is increasing
as L grows (again, because the amount of capital is held fixed when we measure MPL).
This exercise demonstrates that it is possible to have a diminishing marginal rate of
technical substitution even though both of the marginal products are increasing.
6.14 Consider the following production functions and their associated marginal products.
For each production function, determine the marginal rate of technical substitution of
labor for capital, and indicate whether the isoquants for the production function exhibit
diminishing marginal rate of substitution.
Production MPL MPK MRTSL,K Diminishing Diminishing Diminishing

function marginal marginal marginal
product of product of rate of
labor? capital? technical
substitution
NO NO NO
YES YES YES
YES YES YES
NO NO YES
NO NO NO
6.15. Suppose that a firm’s production function is given by Q = KL + K, with MPK = L + 1

and MPL = K . At point A, the firm uses K = 3 units of capital and L = 5 units of labor. At
point B, along the same isoquant, the firm would only use 1 unit of capital.
a) Calculate how much labor is required at point B.
b) Calculate the elasticity of substitution between A and B. Does this production function
exhibit a higher or lower elasticity of substitution than a Cobb–Douglas function over this
range of inputs?
a) At point A, the firm produces 18 units of output. Therefore, since B is on the same
isoquant, it must be that L = 17 at B.
b) The capital-to-labor ratio at A is 3/5 and MRTSL,K = ½. At B, the capital-to-labor
ratio is 1/17, and MRTSL,K = 1/18.
Therefore the elasticity of substitution is
(1 / 17  3 / 5) /(3 / 5) 69
 .
(1 / 18  1 / 2) /(1 / 2) 68

A Cobb-Douglas production function has an elasticity of substitution of 1.

Therefore this production function has a slightly higher elasticity of substitution,
indicating a slightly greater ease of substitutability of inputs.
6.16. Two points, A and B, are on an isoquant drawn with labor on the horizontal axis and
capital on the vertical axis. The capital–labor ratio at B is twice that at A, and the elasticity
of substitution as we move from A to B is 2. What is the ratio of the MRTSL,K at A versus
that at B?
Since the capital-labor ratio at B is twice that at A, it implies that the percent change in
this ratio as we move from A to B is 100%. If we denote the percent change in the MRTS
over these two points as x then using the definition of elasticity of substitution,
100
 2, which means that %MRTS L , K  50.
%MRTS L , K
MRTS B  MRTS A MRTS A 2

Equivalently,  100  50. Solving,  .
MRTS A MRTS B 3
6.17. Let B be the number of bicycles produced from F bicycle frames and T tires. Every
bicycle needs exactly two tires and one frame.
a) Draw the isoquants for bicycle production.
b) Write a mathematical expression for the production function for bicycles.
a) This isoquants for this situation will be L-shaped as in the following diagram
Tires
6 Q=3
4 Q=2
2 Q=1
Frames
1 2 3
These L-shaped isoquants imply that once you have the correct combination of
inputs, say 2 frames and 4 tires, additional units of one resource without more
units of the other resource will not result in any additional output.
b) Mathematically this production function can be written

1
Q  min( F , T )
2
where F and T represent the number of frames and tires.
6.18. To produce cake, you need eggs E and premixed ingredients I. Every cake needs
exactly one egg and one package of ingredients. When you add two eggs to one package of
ingredients, you produce only one cake. Similarly, when you have only one egg, you can’t
produce two cakes even though you have two packages of ingredients.
a) Draw several isoquants of the cake production function.
b)Write a mathematical expression for this production function. What can you say about
returns to scale of this function?
a)
mix
1 2 3 eggs
b) The formula is # of cakes = Min{# of eggs, # of ingredients’ packages}. This

production function has constant returns to scale. To see why, let x and y denoted
the quantities of eggs and mix, respectively, and let Q denote the number of cakes
produced. The equation of our production function is: Q = Min(x,y). If we
increase each input by a factor of a, we have the following quantity of cake:
min{ax, ay} = a min{x, y} = aQ. Hence, increasing the quantities of inputs by a
given proportion results in the same proportionate increase in output, and the
production function thus exhibits constant returns to scale.

6.19. What can you say about the returns to scale of the linear production function Q = aK
+ bL, where a and b are positive constants?
If we were to scale up all inputs by a factor  (that is, replace K by K, and L by L), the
resulting output would equal Q. Therefore a linear production function has constant
returns to scale.
6.20. What can you say about the returns to scale of the Leontief production function Q =
min(aK, bL), where a and b are positive constants?
A general fixed proportions production function is of the form Q  min( aK , bL) . If we

were to scale up all inputs by a factor  (that is, replace K by K, and L by L), the
resulting output would be min( aK , bL)   min( aK , bL) = Q. Therefore the
production function has constant returns to scale.
6.21. A firm produces a quantity Q of breakfast cereal using labor L and material M with
the production function Q = 50√ML + M+ L. The marginal product functions for this
production function are
a) Are the returns to scale increasing, constant, or decreasing for this production function?
b) Is the marginal product of labor ever diminishing for this production function? If so,
when? Is it ever negative, and if so, when?
a) To determine the nature of returns to scale, increase all inputs by some factor 
and determine if output goes up by a factor more than, less than, or the same as
.
Q  50  M  L   M   L
Q  50 ML   M   L
Q   50 ML  M  L 
Q  Q
By increasing the inputs by a factor of  output goes up by a factor of  . Since
output goes up by the same factor as the inputs, this production function exhibits
constant returns to scale.
b) The marginal product of labor is

M
MPL  25 1
L
Suppose M  0 . Holding M fixed, increasing L will have the effect of
decreasing MPL . The marginal product of labor is decreasing for all levels of L .
The MPL , however, will never be negative since both components of the equation
above will always be greater than or equal to zero. In fact, for this production
function, MPL  1 .
6.22 Consider a production function whose equation is given by the formula

which has corresponding marginal products, and Show that the
elasticity of substitution for this production function is exactly equal to 1, no matter what
the values of K and L are.
ANSWER
First note that In this case that implies,
which simplifies to
Now recall that the definition of the elasticity of substitution is
Since it follows that will be exactly equal to (You can

verify this
by plugging in particular values for . Suppose, for example, , and then changes to
, an increase of 66.66 percent. Since it follows that MRTSL,K changes
from 1 to 1.5, (also an increase of 66.66 percent.) In other words, since the marginal rate of
substitution of labor for capital is proportional to the capital-labor ratio, the percentage change in
the marginal rate of substitution of labor for capital must equal the percentage change in the
capital-labor ratio. Since then using the definition of the elasticity of
substitution, it follows that,

6.23. A firm’s production function is Q = 5L2/3K1/3 with MPK = (5/3)L2/3K−2/3 and MPL =
(10/3)L−1/3K1/3.
a) Does this production function exhibit constant, increasing, or decreasing returns to
scale?
b) What is the marginal rate of technical substitution of L for K for this production
function?
c) What is the elasticity of substitution for this production function?
a) Notice that (aK)1/3(aL)2/3 = a1/3a2/3 K1/3 L2/3 = a K1/3 L2/3 = aQ. This production
function exhibits constant returns to scale.
b) MRTSL,K = MPL / MPK = 2 K/L .
c) Because this is a Cobb-Douglas production function, its elasticity of substitution

equals 1.
6.24. Consider a CES production function given by Q = (K0.5 + L0.5)2.

a) What is the elasticity of substitution for this production function?
b) Does this production function exhibit increasing, decreasing, or constant returns to
scale?
c) Suppose that the production function took the form Q = (100 + K0.5 + L0.5)2. Does this
production function exhibit increasing, decreasing, or constant returns to scale?
a) For a CES production function of the form


  1  1  1

Q   aL   bK  
 
the elasticity of substitution is  . In this example we have a CES production
function of the form
2
Q   K 0.5  L0.5  .
To determine the elasticity of substitution, either set (  1) /   0.5 or

 /(  1)  2 and solve for  .
 1
 0.5

  1  0.5
0.5  1
  2.
In either case, the elasticity of substitution is 2.

b)
2
Q  ( K )0.5  ( L) 0.5 
2
Q  ( 0.5 )( K 0.5  L0.5 ) 
2
Q    K 0.5  L0.5 
Q  Q.
Since output goes up by the same factor as the inputs, this production function
exhibits constant returns to scale.
c)
2
Q  100  ( K )0.5  ( L)0.5 
2
Q  100   0.5 ( K 0.5  L0.5 ) 
2
 100 
Q    0.5  K 0.5  L0.5   Q.
 
When the inputs are increased by a factor of  , where   1 output goes up by a

factor less than  implying decreasing returns to scale.
Intuitively, in this production function, while you can increase the K and L
inputs, you cannot increase the constant portion. So output cannot go up by as
much as the inputs.
6.25 Consider the following production functions and their associated marginal products.
For each production function, indicate whether (a) the marginal product of each input is
diminishing, constant, or increasing in the quantity of that input; (b) the production
function exhibits decreasing, constant, or increasing returns to scale.
Production MPL MPK Marginal Marginal Returns to

function product of product of scale?
labor? capital?
CONSTANT in CONSTANT in CONSTANT
L K
DIMINISHING DIMINISHING CONSTANT
in L in K
DIMINISHING DIMINISHING DECREASING
in L in K
INCREASING INCREASING INCREASING
in L in K
CONSTANT in CONSTANT in INCREASING
L K

6.26. The following table presents information on how many cookies can be produced from
eggs and a mixture of other ingredients (measured in ounces):
Recently, you found a new way to mix ingredients with eggs. The same amount of
ingredients and eggs produces different numbers of cookies, as shown in the following
table:
a) Verify that the change to the new production function represents technological progress.
b) For each production fuction find the marginal products of eggs when mixed ingredients
is held fixed at 8. Verify that when mixed ingredients is held fixed at 8, the technological
progress increases the marginal product of eggs.
a) For each pair of inputs, except those where there are no eggs or no other
ingredients, new recipe produces more cookies. Hence, the new recipe represents
technological progress.
b) MPE =Q/E, where E denotes the quantity of eggs. With mixed ingredients held
fixed at 8, we have:
MPE = (8 – 0)/(1 – 0) = 8, when E goes from 0 to 1.
MPE is zero for all subsequent changes in E.
After the technological progress we have:

Comparing the marginal products, we see that MPE (when mix equals 8 is
higher after the technological progress.

6.27. Suppose a firm’s production function initially took the form Q = 500(L + 3K).
However, as a result of a manufacturing innovation, its production function is now Q =
1000(0.5L + 10K).
a) Show that the innovation has resulted in technological progress in the sense defined in
the text.
b) Is the technological progress neutral, labor saving, or capital saving?
a) It is possible to write the two production functions as

Q1  500 L  1,500 K
Q2  500 L  10, 000 K
Since Q2  Q1 for given quantities of K and L , the firm can achieve more
output for a given combination of inputs. This innovation has therefore resulted
in technological progress as defined in the text.
b) Initially MPK  1,500 and MPL  500 implying the MRTSL, K  0.33 . After the
innovation the MPK  10,000 and MPL  500 implying the MRTSL, K  0.05 .
Since the marginal rate of technical substitution of labor for capital has decreased
after the innovation this is labor-saving technological progress.
6.28. A firm’s production function is initially Q = KL, with MPK = 0.5(√L/√K) and MPL =
0.5(√K/√L). Over time, the production function changes to Q = KL, with MPK = L and MPL
= K.
a) Verify that this change represents technological progress.
b) Is this change labor saving, capital saving, or neutral?
a) With any positive amounts of K and L, KL  KL so more Q can be produced

with the final production function. So there is indeed technological progress.
b) With the initial production function MPL K

MRTS L, K   .
MPK L
MPL K
With the final production function MRTS L, K   .
MPK L
For any ratio of capital to labor, MRTSL,K is the same for the two production
functions. Thus, the technological progress is neutral.
6.29. A firm’s production function is initially Q = KL, with MPK = 0.5(√L/√K) and MPL =
0.5(√K/√L). Over time, the production function changes to Q = K√L, with MPK = √L and
MPL = 0.5(K/√L).

a) Verify that this change represents technological progress.

b) Is this change labor saving, capital saving, or neutral?
a) With any positive amounts of K and L, KL  K L so more Q can be produced

with the final production function. So there is indeed technological progress.
MPL K
b) With the initial production function MRTS L, K   .
MPK L
With the final production function MPL 0.5K

MRTS L, K   .
MPK L
For any ratio of capital to labor, MRTSL,K is lower with the second production
function. Thus, the technological progress is labor-saving.
6.30 Suppose that in the 21st century the production of semiconductors requires two
inputs: capital (denoted by K) and labor (denoted by L). The production function takes the
form However, in the 23rd century, suppose the production function for
semiconductors will take the form In other words, in the 23rd century it will be
possible to produce semiconductors entirely with capital (perhaps because of robots).
a. Does this change in the production function change the returns to scale?
b. Is this change in the production function an illustration of technological progress?
a. No. In both the 21st and 23rd centuries, the production function for this good exhibited
constant returns to scale. In both cases, increasing inputs by a given proportion
increases output by the same proportion.
b. The change in the production function is not an example of technological progress.
This is because we do not get more output from a given combination of inputs. For
example, if L = 100, K=100, in the 21st century . In the 21st
century, with the same input combination, we would get the same output, Q = 100.

Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK UNCLE
WIGGILY'S SILK HAT ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions

will be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.

copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright
in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and without
paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General
Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and
distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if
you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the
trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the
Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such
as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and
printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in
the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright
law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the

free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this
work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase
“Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of
the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or
online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and

Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand,
agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to
abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using
and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for
obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms
of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only

be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by
people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
There are a few things that you can do with most Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There
are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™
electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and
help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright
law in the United States and you are located in the United
States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying,
distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project
Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will
support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project
Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms
of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with
its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project

Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other

immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project
Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United

States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United
States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is

derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to
anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges.
If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of
paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use
of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth
in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is

posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder.
Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™
License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright
holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project

Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files
containing a part of this work or any other work associated with
Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or

providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project

Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -

Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If

you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set

forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the

Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500

West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws

regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states

where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot

make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current

donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several

printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.

Instant Download PDF Microeconomics 5th Edition Besanko Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Instant Download PDF Microeconomics 5th Edition Besanko Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Instant Download PDF Microeconomics 5th Edition Besanko Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Microeconomics 5th Edition Besanko

Microeconomics 5th Edition Besanko Test Bank

Microeconomics 4th Edition Besanko Solutions Manual

Microeconomics 4th Edition Besanko Test Bank

Economics Of Strategy 5th Edition Besanko Test Bank

Microeconomics 5th Edition Krugman Solutions Manual

Economics of Strategy 6th Edition Besanko Solutions

Economics of Strategy 6th Edition Besanko Test Bank

Microeconomics 5th Edition Krugman Test Bank

Inputs and Production Functions

Solutions to Review Questions

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 1

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 2

By operating on the uneconomic portion of an isoquant, the firm would be using a

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 3

8. What is the elasticity of substitution? What does it tell us?

Decreasing Returns to Scale

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 4

Constant Returns to Scale

- 250 500 750 1,000

Increasing Returns to Scale

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 5

a) What is the average product of fertilizer when 4 tons are used?

a) The input combination gives Q = 97 so it is infeasible.

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 6

The completed table is shown below:

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 7

Total Product with K=600

AP and MP with K=600

-100000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 8

Total Product with K=1200

AP and MP with K=1200

-500000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

6.5. Are the following statements correct or incorrect?

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 9

a) Incorrect. When MP  AP we know that AP is increasing. When MP  AP we

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 10

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 11

The correct answers are shown in bold face red type.

Labor, L Total product, Q APL MPL

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 12

b) Recall that marginal product of an input, say labor, is given by Q/L. If we

a. The Q = 100 isoquant looks like this:

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 13

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 14

b) Because each of these isoquants has an upward-sloping portion beyond some

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 15

Production MPL MPK MRTSL,K Diminishing Diminishing Diminishing

YES YES YES

6.15. Suppose that a firm’s production function is given by Q = KL + K, with MPK = L + 1

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 16

A Cobb-Douglas production function has an elasticity of substitution of 1.

MRTS B  MRTS A MRTS A 2

b) Mathematically this production function can be written

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 17

b) The formula is # of cakes = Min{# of eggs, # of ingredients’ packages}. This

Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 6 - 18