IN THE COURT OF SH.

ANURAG SAIN, DISTRICT JUDGE

(COMMERCIAL), PATIALA HOUSE COURT, NEW DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:

SUNSHINE TEAHOUSE PVT. LTD. PLAINTIFF

VERSUS
LENOY PRADEEP T.A. DEFENDANT

COMPILATION OF JUDGMENTS

S. Name of Judgment and Citation Para Pg.

No. Nos. No.

Grant of injunction becomes necessary if adoption prima facie dishonest

1. Midas Hygiene Industries (P) Ltd. v. Sudhir 5, 6 1-2
Bhatia(2004) 3 SCC 90
2. Hindustan Pencils Private Limited v. India 28 3-15
StationaryProducts Co.
1989 SCC OnLine Del 34
Literal translations or transliterations of a mark constitute trademark
infringement

3. Bhatia Plastics vs. Peacock Industries Ltd. 15-18 16-27

1995RLR63

4. The Indian Express Ltd. & Ors. vs. Chandra 19, 23, 28-41
Prakash Shivhare 32
2016(3)ABR189
5. Pepsico Inc. and Ors. Vs. Jagpin Breweries Ltd. 26, 29, 42-67
and Ors. 43, 46
302(2023)DLT381
6. New Bharat Overseas vs. Kian Agro Processing 43 68-86
Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
297(2023)DLT160
The Court has to consider the overall impression of the mark in the
minds of general public and not by merely comparing the dissimilarities
in the two marks
 7. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC v 35 87-108
SharekhanLtd
2014 SCC OnLine Del 2317

FILED BY

ANKIT MIGLANI
COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF
G-26, VARDHMAN SUNRISE PLAZA,
VASUNDHARA ENCLACE, NEW DELHI – 110096

NEW DELHI
06.06.2024