Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instant Download PDF Organic Chemistry Mechanistic Patterns Canadian 1st Edition Ogilvie Solutions Manual Full Chapter
Instant Download PDF Organic Chemistry Mechanistic Patterns Canadian 1st Edition Ogilvie Solutions Manual Full Chapter
Instant Download PDF Organic Chemistry Mechanistic Patterns Canadian 1st Edition Ogilvie Solutions Manual Full Chapter
https://testbankfan.com/product/organic-chemistry-1st-edition-
klein-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/organic-chemistry-1st-edition-
klein-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/organic-chemistry-3rd-edition-
klein-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/organic-chemistry-7th-edition-
mcmurry-solutions-manual/
Essential Organic Chemistry Canadian 3rd Edition Bruice
Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/essential-organic-chemistry-
canadian-3rd-edition-bruice-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/laboratory-manual-for-general-
organic-and-biological-chemistry-1st-edition-todd-deal-solutions-
manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/general-organic-and-biological-
chemistry-7th-edition-stoker-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/organic-chemistry-principles-and-
mechanisms-2nd-edition-karty-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/general-organic-and-biological-
chemistry-6th-edition-stoker-solutions-manual/
Chapter 8
Bonds as Nucleophiles:
Reactions of Alkenes, Alkynes, Dienes, and Enols
CHECKPOINT PROBLEMS
a)
First, add the H atoms around the double bond and identify the roles of the reagents.
Now, draw mechanistic arrows to show the flow of electrons from the nucleophile to the
electrophile. Be sure to direct the arrow toward the δ+ part of the electrophile and continue to
push the electron pairs to the ultimate electron sink (Cl–).
Next, draw the products of this step, using the arrows to determine the products.
There is no preference as to which carbon the H adds to, since cyclohexene is symmetrical.
Now, repeat the process for the new set of intermediate reactants.
Redraw the steps to show the total mechanism, leaving out added lone pairs and hydrogens.
b)
First, identify the reagents adding H atoms to the alkene and add mechanistic arrows to show
electron flow from the nucleophilic π–bond to the electrophile.
Reacting the intermediate nucleophile (Nu) and electrophile (E) gives the final product.
c)
Leaving out the lone pairs this time to avoid clutter, the two reagents are the nucleophilic
alkene Nu and the electrophilic hydrogen on E. Donating the π-electrons to the H gives
H O H O
+ H O S OH + O S OH
H O H O
H
Nu E
The second step in the reaction is the nucleophilic, charged oxygen on the hydrogen sulfate
ion donating electrons to the charged carbon in the electrophilic carbocation.
d)
Add H atoms to the alkene and expand the structure of the carboxylic acid. Then, react the
alkene π electrons with the electrophilic H atom in the acid.
The next step is the carboxylate anion reacting with the positive carbocation.
a)
Since this diene is symmetric, the same initial carbocation products will form regardless
of which double bond you choose. The possibility for different carbocations comes from
reacting either end of the alkene with the acidic proton. Picking the top double bond
arbitrarily gives two products shown below, with the added H atom shown for clarity.
The top one has the resonance forms indicated and would be the most stable.
As in part (a), the symmetry here means reacting either double bond will result in the same
set of products.
The tertiary carbocation is more stable and most of the reaction will proceed through this
intermediate.
tertiary carbocation
+ Cl
Cl
+ major
H Cl
+
Cl
Cl
minor
secondary carbocation
The major product goes through the more stable tertiary intermediate.
c) This alkene is symmetric, so only one possible intermediate forms, leading to one product.
The major product forms through the more stable tertiary carbocation intermediate.
The secondary carbocation will be preferred and lead the major product indicated.
a) This is a symmetric diene, so reaction of one or the other double bond would lead to the
same products. Considering reacting just one double bond leads to the following possible
reaction pathways. Both reactions generate secondary carbocations as intermediates.
The top reaction proceeds through a resonance-stabilized intermediate, but reaction of either
resonance form leads to the same final product. This is the favoured pathway, as this would
be the most stable carbocation and therefore the one that will be formed most rapidly.
The bottom reaction leads to the product shown, which would be the minor product.
The bottom pathway will be favoured due to the more stable resonance-stabilized
carbocation, which will be formed more rapidly than the secondary carbocation of the top
pathway. Two products result from this pathway, since the carbocation sites in the resonance
forms are not symmetric. A third, distinct, minor product is formed via the bottom pathway,
as indicated.
c) To simplify the diagrams, consider the reaction of each double bond separately. The first
bond would proceed through two secondary carbocation intermediates and lead to the two
products shown.
Reaction of the other double bond would also proceed through two pathways each, with a
secondary carbocation intermediate, as shown.
Br
+
O Br O
+ H Br
O
Br
+
Br
O O
The choice of major product is due to the resonance stabilization of the carbocation in the
bottommost reaction pathway. This is the most stable carbocation and would lead to the
formation of the major product.
a) The reaction proceeds through two carbocations of very different stability. Since primary
carbocations are less stable than tertiary carbocations, the bottom pathway would be
preferred and result in the major product.
b) Here, the bottom pathway proceeds though a secondary carbocation, which is more stable
than the primary carbocation in the upper reaction intermediate. The secondary carbocation
would form faster and lead to the major product, as indicated.
d) The possible reaction pathways for this substrate are shown below.
primary carbocation
slow
O O
+ Br Br
O minor
+ H Br
O O
+ Br
fast Br
major
The most favourable pathway is the bottom one, with the more stable resonance-stabilized
secondary cation intermediate. This leads to the major product indicated.
The products of HCl addition to each substrate (A–C) need to be considered separately.
tertiary carbocation
fast
Cl
+
O Cl O
+ H Cl major
O (desired product)
A
+
O Cl O Cl
slow
minor
primary carbocation
Substrate A has two possible products, as shown, but the favoured one is the desired product. A
would be a good choice to make the required molecule.
tertiary carbocation
fast
Cl
+
O Cl O
major
+ H Cl (desired product)
O
Cl
B
+
O Cl O
slow
minor
secondary carbocation
slow Cl
O O
+
Cl
minor
O + (desired product)
H Cl
Cl
C
O O
+
Cl
fast
major
O
resonance-stabilized
secondary carbocation
Although the desired product could form, it would not be the favoured reaction pathway.
The bottom reaction pathway is preferred due to the resonance stabilization of the secondary
carbocation, as shown.
The hydronium ion will be the electrophile reacting with the alkene.
Overall reaction
H 2O
OH
H2SO4
The protonated alcohol group will be the electrophile reacting with the alkene.
Overall reaction
EtOH
OEt
H3PO4
c) Sulfuric acid will react with the double bond to generate a tertiary carbocation.
The alcohol group in the molecule is the best nucleophile available and will react with the
carbocation.
The slightly basic hydrogen sulphate ion will deprotonate the ether product regenerating
sulphuric acid.
Overall reaction
H2SO4
OH O
The alcohol group in the molecule is the best nucleophile available and will react with the
carbocation.
The slightly basic dihydrogen phosphate ion will deprotonate the ether product, regenerating
phosphoric acid.
Overall reaction
H3PO4
O
OH
e) Sulphuric acid will protonate the double bond to form a resonance-stabilized carbocation,
which is more stable than the tertiary carbocation that could form.
The alcohol group will be the nucleophile reacting with the carbocation. Then, the hydrogen
sulphate will remove the hydrogen from the protonated intermediate, giving the final product.
Overall reaction
H H
O H2SO4 O O O O
OH
H H
cis trans
The reaction proceeds from reactant A through intermediates B and C to final product D, as
shown in the figure below.
OH2 OH
A B C D
B
Energy
C
A
Reaction progress
The product D is more stable than the reactant A, so it is represented with the lower energy. Both
intermediates are less stable than either A or D. Comparing B to C, B is shown at the highest
energy (least stable), since the only bonds are broken going from A ─> B, but an new C–O bond
is made going from B ─> C. This would make C significantly lower in energy than B.
a) The π bond will be the nucleophile and the mercury atom will be the electrophile in the first
step.
The second step will be the nucleophilic methanol reacting with the electrophilic carbon in
the mercurium ion. Either side leads to the same regioisomer (but not stereoisomers), so only
one pathway needs to be considered.
Only one regioisomer will form, since attack at either side of the mercurium ion results in
the same regioisomer.
The acetate ion will deprotonate the intermediate to form the final product.
There are two pathways from this intermediate, each leading to a different regioisomer.
Path A will be the favoured one, with the incoming nucleophile attacking the tertiary carbon,
which would have the greater carbocation character.
fast O
HgOAc
+ Hg(OAc) 2
major product
HO
O
slow
HgOAc
Path A
OAc H Me Me
O O
Me OH
HgOAc
HgOAc HgOAc
+ HOAc
Path B
Me OH
HgOAc HgOAc
HgOAc
O O
Me H Me
OAc + HOAc
In Path A, the methanol reacts with a primary carbon, while in Path B, the methanol reacts at
the secondary site. There will be more positive charge on the secondary site, so Path B will
be the preferred pathway.
slow
Me
O
HgOAc
+ Hg(OAc) 2
MeOH
fast HgOAc
O
Me
major product
The two products that result are stereoisomers. They are produced from the mercuric acetate
approaching from either side of the double bond. These are labelled Path A and Path B below.
The arrows are not meant to denote electron movement; rather, the approach of the mercuric
a) The bromonium ion formed has a tertiary carbon, which is the preferred site for the incoming
nucleophile. The nucleophile adds trans to the bromine leading to a trans product.
b) The initial ion has primary and secondary carbons at the reactive site. The secondary site will
react fastest and lead to the indicated product.
c)
d)
f)
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
This transformation could potentially be accomplished by using Cl2 and water. The
regiospecificity of the addition would give the desired product.
Epoxidation and ring opening with chloride could give the desired product. In order to get the
regiochemistry correct, the ring opening would have to be done in neutral conditions. This would
bring about preferred chloride attack at the primary carbon.
a)
b)
c)
e)
a) Regioselective, stereospecific
b) Regioselective, stereospecific
c) Stereospecific
d) Stereoselective
b)
c)
d)
a) D
D G‡ D G‡
C,B C,D
B
Energy
Reaction coordinate
b) The kinetic product is formed fastest with the smallest energy barrier. The smallest barrier is
C → B (ΔG‡C,B), so A would be the kinetic product.
a)
b)
d)
a)
b)
8.21
The pair of electrons was being equally shared by the two carbon atoms. In the product, one
carbon is still sharing its electron in the carbon–electrophile bond (no change in charge). The
other carbon has lost the electron it used to be sharing, so it has a +1 charge. As well, charge
conservation still applies to organic reactions.
8.22
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
The reverse reaction would be thermodynamically unfavourable, since the products in the
reverse reaction would be higher in energy than its reactants.
The rate-determining step would be the first step in the reverse reaction (second step in the
forward reaction), as it has the highest activation energy barrier.
reverse reaction direction
+ Br
H
reverse reaction
is endothermic Br
+ H
Br
Reaction coordinate
8.24
The carbocation formed is the key to understanding this outcome. The diene is symmetric, so
reaction with HBr at either double bond gives the same initial carbocation. The incoming
bromide nucleophile can attack this resonance-stabilized carbocation at either site of partial
positive charge to form the two products.
a)
The carbocation circled above is the more stable because it is a tertiary carbocation, while
the other is a secondary carbocation. The more alkyl-substituted carbocation has more
stabilization through induction. It is formed faster because the inductive effects that make
this tertiary carbocation more stable also make the transition state that leads to its formation
more stable.
b)
Both carbocations are tertiary, but the oxygen containing one is resonance stabilized. This
resonance stabilization will be present, to some degree, in the transition state leading to this
intermediate. It will have a lower energy of activation and form faster.
The carbocation on the right will form from a transition state of higher energy since it is not
resonance stabilized. It will form more slowly.
c)
Both are secondary carbocations, but the indicated one also has resonance stabilization. The
resonance-stabilized intermediate will form faster, since the transition state leading to its
formation will be more stable due to resonance.
a)
b)
c) The alkene is symmetrical, so the two carbocation intermediates that form are
indistinguishable and of identical energy. The product of each is the same.
d)
In the reaction of a) with HBr, a centre of chirality is created. Both enantiomers will be formed in
equal amounts.
In the reaction of b) with HBr, one non-chiral product is formed from one of the possible
carbocations. Two other chiral products form through the other carbocation intermediate. In the
reaction of b) with HBr, the two carbocation intermediates formed will be of comparable
stabilities. An achiral product is formed from one of the carbocations. Two additional chiral
products are obtained from the other carbocation intermediate.
a) and b)
HBr Addition
H2O Addition
CH3CH2OH Addition
c) Acid is needed because water and alcohols are not acidic enough to protonate the alkene.
d) Yes. Thiol addition would require an acid catalyst because, though more acidic than an
alcohol or water, it is not acidic enough to protonate the alkene.
The oxymercuration/demercuration reaction takes place under milder reaction conditions than
those used in acid catalysed hydrolysis of alkenes. This is important if other parts of the organic
substrate are sensitive to such conditions. The reaction is irreversible, so higher product yields
can be obtained. Acid-catalyzed hydration occurs through carbocation intermediates, which may
rearrange (see Chapter 10), leading to more complex mixtures of products. Oxymercuration
/demercuration has no carbocation intermediate and, thus, usually avoids this complication.
8.31
b) These reactions are stereospecific, achieved by reaction of the alkene with Cl2 and H2O. The
intermediate is a bridged chloronium ion, so the incoming nucleophile must add anti-
periplanar to the carbon-chlorine bond that is being broken (see the preceding question). The
products will have the chlorine and hydroxyl groups trans to each other.
c) These reactions are stereospecific. The intermediate is a bridged bromonium ion, so the
incoming bromide must add anti-periplanar to the carbon-bromine bond (similar to part (b)).
The products will have bromines trans to each other.
d) The reaction is stereospecific. The H–B bond adds in a concerted fashion, with the new C–H
and C–B bonds forming at the same time on the same face of the alkene. The oxidative
removal of the boron does not affect the stereochemistry produced in the first step. This will
always give syn-addition products.
f) Stereospecific. A concerted reaction forms both C–O bonds at the same time on the same
face of the alkene; syn-addition.
Either acid catalyzed addition of water (e.g. H2SO4(cat), H2O) or oxymercuration in water
(Hg(OAc)2, H2O) followed by a reductive removal of the mercury with NaBH4.
b) This is addition of water to an alkene. In order to get the –OH group on the carbon atom
indicated, that carbon must be the site of the most stable carbocation intermediate.
The reagents are similar to those of part (a): acid catalyzed addition of water (e.g.,
H2SO4(cat), H2O) or oxymercuration in water (Hg(OAc)2, H2O) followed by a reductive
removal of the mercury with NaBH4. Note that the oxymercuration is the preferred route, as
the acid catalyzed reaction may lead to a rearranged product.
c) The alkene must include the carbon to which the –OH has added, so the only possibility is
3-hexene leads only to the desired regioisomer, but 2-hexene produces two regioisomers.
3-hexene will be the better starting material.
These two alkanes can be formed from the same alkene by addition of hydrogen across
different faces of the double bond.
8.34
The bond to make the ring was formed at the O atom. Taking this into consideration, there are
two possible starting materials.
To form the desired product, the initial carbocation formed by each alkene must be on the carbon indicated
Compound A will not work, as the stable carbocation would be on the secondary carbon, which
will cyclize to a four-membered ring, not the desired product.
Compound B would form the needed carbocation, leading to the following mechanism of formation.
a) The first step is hydrogenation, with a poisoned catalyst giving only a single reduction.
b) In the second sequence, a sterically hindered borane would first add to the alkyne.
Then, oxidative removal of the borane group would lead to an intermediate enol, which
would rearrange into an aldehyde.
c) In the third sequence, the first step is hydration of one of the π bonds, forming an enol that
rearranges into the more stable ketone.
a)
b)
8.37
a) This would be a simple Markovnikov addition of water to the double bond. So, either acid
catalyzed hydration or oxymercuration followed by reductive workup with sodium
borohydride will form the product.
b) This is a Markovnikov addition of methanol to the alkene. Using methanol with an acid
catalyst or oxymercuration in methanol followed by reduction would give the desired product.
d) To form this halohydrin, the nucleophile used last will be the bromide. Formation of an
epoxide with mCPBA followed by bromide ion under acidic conditions gives the desired
regiochemistry.
e) This is anti-Markovnikov addition of water. So, a borane is needed to add the initial
hydrogen with this regiochemistry. The borane can be removed oxidatively to give the final
alcohol.
a) Both products arise from the initial tertiary (most stable) carbocation. Path A is nucleophilic
addition of the bromide to produce the alkyl bromide product. The regiochemistry is
controlled by the site of the most stable carbocation.
Path A
Br Br
H Br
Path B leads to the alkene product. This is where the bromide ion acts as a base to remove a
hydrogen adjacent to the carbocation.
Path B
H Br Br
H
H
b) The regioselectivity is controlled by the location of the most stable carbocation in the
intermediates in both steps.
Step 1
H Cl Cl
Cl
most stable
carbocation
Step 2
H Cl Cl
Cl Cl Cl Cl
most stable
carbocation
Step 1
induced dipole
cis-addition
d- B
d+
H
B
H d+
d-
The alcohol is part of an enol, which then rearranges to the more stable carbonyl compound
under the basic conditions of the reaction.
In the next step, the fluoride ion acts as a nucleophile to open the bromonium ion. The
stereochemistry of the fluoride addition is controlled by two factors. First, F− adds trans to
the bromine atom. Second, F− adds to the most-substituted carbon, which will have the most
carbocation character.
trans addition F
F
Br
Br
most substituted
one enantiomer
Since the initial bromonium ion is a racemic mixture of enantiomers, so must be the
products, one of which is shown above.
H Br H Br
Br Br H H Br H H
Br Br
Br H Br Br H
(2S, 3S) (2R, 3R)
2,3-dibromobutane (2S, 3S) (2R, 3R)
In rotating around the C–C bond to arrange the Br atoms in a trans fashion, it can be seen
that a cis-alkene would be needed to get the required stereochemistry from the trans addition
of Br2. A cis alkene is easily synthesized using an alkyne and Lindlar catalyst, since the
hydrogen adds with cis stereochemistry.
b) To add three halogens to a triple bond, a hydrohalogenation step and a halogenation step are
required. There is no stereochemistry to consider, so Cl2 addition followed by a HBr
addition would give the desired product.
The required alkyne would be the same as in part (c), but an anti-Markovnikov addition is
needed. This can be accomplished by hydroboration with a bulky borane.
H
H
BCy2 H H 2O 2
OH
H NaOH H
H BCy2
enol rearranges to
cis addition final aldehyde product
8.41
The bromine can add to a C–C double bond. The enol-keto equilibrium is the source of the C–C
double bond. A bromonium ion is the product of the first step.
The nearby lone pairs on the –OH group can act as an internal nucleophile, opening up the
bromonium ring. The protonated ketone is then deprotonated by the bromide ion acting as a base.
The first step in the reaction of nerol is an acid-catalyzed cyclization and loss of water.
From here, there are two pathways to form the products observed. The water present can act as a
base to remove a hydrogen and form an alkene, shown as Path 1 below.
Path 1
H2O
+ H 3O
H
H
H
The other pathway is the water acting as a nucleophile and attacking the carbocation to
ultimately form the alcohol product, shown as Path 2.
Path 2
+ H3O
H2O
O OH
H H
H2O
The reaction of geraniol is slightly different. The geometry of the double bond nearest the
alcohol group is opposite to that of the six-membered ring that forms. The isomerization can
occur by first forming an allyl carbocation.
C–C bond
rotation
This geometry allows the formation of the six-membered ring by nucleophilic attack of the
double bond electrons on the terminal carbocation, forming a bond between the carbon atoms
labelled 1 and 2 below.
This is the same intermediate as formed in the nerol reaction and would follow Path 1 and Path 2
shown above to form the same final alkene and alcohol products.
8.43
Answer: (a). The first step determines the reaction rate, since the addition of the bromine creates
a bromonium intermediate of high energy.
8.44
Answer: (c). The carbon has three bonds, so it is considered sp2 hybridized.
Add the chlorine atoms trans to each other, then rotate into the conformation shown.
8.46
The regiochemistry of the reaction puts the –OH group on the more substituted carbon, so A and
B are not major products. The stereochemistry means C is the only possible major product
shown.
8.47
The –OH group is acting as a nucleophile. The first step is carbocation formation by adding a
proton to the alkene. The –OH group then reacts at the tertiary carbocation, forming a bicyclic
ring system. The chloride ion then deprotonates the intermediate to make the final product.
{594}
"I have the honor to report that I sent you on the 27th
instant, and confirmed in my dispatch Number 211 of that date,
a telegram which deciphered read as follows. … 'General
Aguinaldo gone my instance Hongkong arrange with Dewey
co-operation insurgents Manila.
PRATT.'
{595}
The truth was that Cervera was then just entering the
Caribbean Sea, considerably to the south of Sampson's search.
He touched at the French island of Martinique, and at the
Dutch island of Curaçoa, and then slipped across to Santiago
de Cuba, where he was to be overtaken by his fate. In the long
hill-sheltered bay, with a narrow entrance, which forms this
excellent Cuban harbor, the Spanish fleet was so hidden that
nearly a fortnight passed before its whereabouts could be
fully ascertained. It was not until May 20 that a blockade of
Santiago was established by a flying squadron of the American
fleet, under Commodore Schley, with certainty that the
squadron of Cervera was harbored there. On the 1st of June,
Admiral Sampson arrived on the scene, with a stronger naval
force, and took command. To attempt to force the narrow
entrance of the harbor, strongly fortified and thickly mined
as it was, and attack the Spanish fleet in the bay, was not
deemed practicable. The course resolved upon was to hold the
enemy fast in the shelter he had sought, until Santiago could
be taken, by a land attack. In pursuance of this plan, an
exploit of splendid daring was performed, in the early morning
of June 3, by a young officer, Lieutenant Richmond Pearson
Hobson, with a crew of seven volunteers, who placed and sank a
huge coaling ship, the "Merrimac," in the channel that leads
into Santiago Bay. The following is Admiral Sampson's report
of the undertaking and its achievement:
"The firing had ceased. It was evident the enemy had not seen
us in the general mass of moving objects; but soon the tide
began to drift these away, and we were being left alone with
the catamaran. The men were directed to cling close in, bodies
below and only heads out, close under the edges, and were
directed not to speak above a whisper, for the destroyer was
near at hand, and boats were passing near. We mustered; all
were present, and direction was given to remain as we were
till further orders, for I was sure that in due time after
daylight a responsible officer would come out to reconnoiter.
It was evident that we could not swim against the tide to
reach the entrance. Moreover, the shores were lined with
troops, and the small boats were looking for victims that
might escape from the vessel. The only chance lay in remaining
undiscovered until the coming of the reconnoitering boat, to
which, perhaps, we might surrender without being fired on. …
The air was chilly and the water positively cold. In less than
five minutes our teeth were chattering; so loud, indeed, did
they chatter that it seemed the destroyer or the boats would
hear. … We remained there probably an hour."
{597}
{598}
While Admiral Dewey was holding Manila Bay, before the taking
of the city, there were many rumors and exciting stories
afloat, of offensive behavior towards the American fleet by
commanders of German war ships that were sent to the scene. As
far as possible, the facts were officially suppressed, in
order to avoid a quarrel between the two countries, and no
authoritative account of what occurred can be found. But some
incidents obtained publicity which are probably true in the
main. The first unpleasant happening appears to have been the
arrival in Manila Bay of a German naval vessel, which steamed
in with entire disregard of the blockading fleet, as though
the port was its own. Thereupon Admiral Dewey sent a forcible
reminder to the captain that he was intruding upon a blockade,
by firing a shot across his bow, and ordering him to heave to.
The German captain, in a rage, is said to have called on the
commanding officer of a British squadron that was in the Bay,
for advice as to what he should do, and was told that he owed
the American Admiral an apology for his violation of naval
etiquette, well settled for such circumstances as those
existing in Manila Bay. According to the story, the British
commander, Captain Sir Edward Chichester, himself on the best
of terms with Admiral Dewey, visited the latter, on behalf of
the German officer, and made the matter smooth.
{599}
But, either through indiscretion of his own, or because he had
instructions to interfere as much as possible with the
proceedings of the Americans, the German commander continued
to pursue an offensive course. According to report, be went so
far as to stop a movement which Aguinaldo (then a recognized
ally of the United States) was making, to take possession of a
certain island, and to capture some Spaniards who were on it.
This provoked Admiral Dewey to a demonstration against him so
threatening that he drew back in haste, and the island was
occupied.
4. On transportation.