(Download PDF) Matrix Analysis of Structures 2nd Edition Kassimali Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Matrix Analysis of Structures 2nd
Edition Kassimali Solutions Manual

Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://testbankfan.com/product/matrix-analysis-of-structures-2nd-edition-kassimali-so
lutions-manual/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
Structural Analysis 3rd Edition Kassimali Solutions

Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/structural-analysis-3rd-edition-
kassimali-solutions-manual/
Structural Analysis 5th Edition Aslam Kassimali

Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/structural-analysis-5th-edition-
aslam-kassimali-solutions-manual/
Structural Analysis SI Edition 4th Edition Kassimali

Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/structural-analysis-si-
edition-4th-edition-kassimali-solutions-manual/
Data Structures And Algorithm Analysis In C++ 4th

Edition Weiss Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/data-structures-and-algorithm-
analysis-in-c-4th-edition-weiss-solutions-manual/
Data Structures And Algorithm Analysis In Java 3rd
Edition Weiss Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/data-structures-and-algorithm-
analysis-in-java-3rd-edition-weiss-solutions-manual/
Starting Out With Java From Control Structures Through

Data Structures 2nd Edition Gaddis Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/starting-out-with-java-from-
control-structures-through-data-structures-2nd-edition-gaddis-
solutions-manual/
Dynamics of Structures 4th Edition Chopra Solutions

Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/dynamics-of-structures-4th-
edition-chopra-solutions-manual/
Dynamics of Structures 5th Edition Chopra Solutions

Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/dynamics-of-structures-5th-
edition-chopra-solutions-manual/
Design of Concrete Structures 15th Edition Darwin

Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/design-of-concrete-
structures-15th-edition-darwin-solutions-manual/
CHAPTER 6
6.1
NDOF = 3, NR = 6
 0 
{P} =  0 

 −900 k - in.
131
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
6.2
NDOF = 3, NR = 6
 0 
{P} =  −150 kN ⋅ m 

 0 
132
6.3
NDOF = 2 ; NR = 7
0 
P= 
0 
133
6.4
NDOF = 2 ; NR = 7
0 
P= 
0 
134
6.5
NDOF = 6, NR = 6
30 k 
 0 
 
 0 
{P} =  
 0 
 0 
 
 0 
135
6.6
NDOF = 4, NR = 5
{P} = {0}
136
6.7 E = 29,000 ksi , A = 10.3 in.2 , I = 510 in .4
Member 1: L = 240 in .
1244.6 0 0 −1244.6 0 0 
 12.839 1540.6 0 −12.839 1540.6 
 
246500 0 −1540.6 123250 
[ k ]1 =  1244.6 0 0 
 (symmetric) 12.839 −1540.6 
 
 246500 
FAb = FAe = 0
FSb = FSe = 20 k
40 (120 )
3
FM b = − FM e = = 1200 k - in.
( 240 )
2
 0 
 20 
 
 1200 
{Q f }1 =  0 
 
 20 
 
 −1200 
Member 2: L = 360 in.
829.72 0 0 −829.72 0 0 
 3.804 684.72 0 −3.804 684.72 

 164333 0 −684.72 82167 
[ k ]2 =
829.72 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 3.804 −684.72 
 
 164333 
FAb = FAe = 0
0.125 ( 360 )
FSb = FSe = = 22.5 k
2
0.125 ( 360 )
2
FM b = − FM e = = 1350 k - in.
12
 0 
 22.5 
 
 1350 
{Q } f = 
 0 
2
 22.5 
 
 −1350 
137
6.8 E = 200 (106 ) kN/m 2 , A = 0.013 m 2 , I = 762 (10−6 ) m 4 .
Member 1: L = 10 m.
 260000 0 0 −260000 0 0 
 1828.8 9144 0 −1828.8 9144 
 
60960 0 −9144 30480 
[ k ]1 =  260000 0 0 
 1828.8 −9144 
 ( symmetric ) 
 60960 
FAb = FAe = 0; FSb = FSe =

( −125) = −62.5 kN
2
( −125)( 5 )
3
FM b = − FM e = = −156.25 kN ⋅ m
(10 )
2
 0 
 −62.5 
 
 −156.25
{Q f }1 =  0 
 
 −62.5 
 
 156.25 
Member 2: L = 12 m.
216667 0 0 −216667 0 0 
 1058.3 6350 0 −1058.3 6350 
 
50800 0 −6350 25400 
[ k ]2 =
 216667 0 0 
 1058.3 −6350 
 ( symmetric ) 
 50800 
FAb = FAe = 0
24 (12 )
FSb = FSe = = 144 kN
2
24 (12 )
2
FM b = − FM e = = 288 kN ⋅ m
12
 0 
 144 
 
 288 
{Q } f = 
 0 
2
 144 
 
 −288 
138
6.9 E = 10,000 ksi; A = 8.84 in.2; I = 170 in.4
409.26 0 0 − 409.26 0 0 
 2.0243 218.62 0 − 2.0243 218.62 

 31,481 0 − 218.62 15,741 
k1 =  
 409.26 0 0 
 (symmetric) 2.0243 − 218.62
 
 31,481 
 0 
 27 
FAb = FAe = 0  
 972 
FSb = FSe = 27 k Qf1 =  
0.25(216)2  0 
FM b = −FSe = = 972 k - in.  27 
12  
− 972
491.11 0 0 − 491.11 0 0 
 3.4979 314.81 0 − 3.4979 314.81 

 37,778 0 − 314.81 18,889 
k2 =  
 491.11 0 0 
 (symmetric) 3.4979 − 314.81
 
 37,778 
1 3   − 4.5 
FAb = FAe = −  15 = −4.5 k  6 
2 5   
1 4   270 
FSb = FSe =  15 = 6 k Qf 2 = 
2 5   − 4.5 
FM b = −FSe =
( 4 )15(90)
5
3
= 270 k-in.
 6 
 
− 270
( 180 )2
139
6.10 E = 200(106 ) kN/m 2; A = 0.016 m 2 ; I = 1186(10−6 ) m 4
Member 1: L = 16 m
200,000 0 0 − 200,000 0 0 
 694.92 5,559.4 0 − 694.92 5,559.4 

 59,300 0 − 5,559.4 29,650 
k1 =  
 200,000 0 0 
 (symmetric) 694.92 − 5,559.4
 
 59,300 
Qf1 = 0
Member 2: L = 25 m
128,000 0 0 − 128,000 0 0 
 182.17 2,277.1 0 − 182.17 2,277.1 

 37,952 0 − 2,277.1 18,976 
k2 =  
 128,000 0 0 
 (symmetric) 182.17 − 2,277.1
 
 37,952 
5.6(25)  70 
FAb = FAe = = 70 kN  −240 
2  
19.2(25)  −1000 
FSb = FSe = − = −240 kN Qf 2 =  
2  70 
19.2(25)2  −240 
FM b = −FSe = = −1000 kN ⋅ m  
12  1000 
140
6.11 E = 4500 ksi.
Members 1 and 3: A = 80 in.2 , I = 550 in.4 , L = 240 in .
1500 0 0 −1500 0 0 
 2.1484 257.81 0 −2.1484 257.81 

 41250 0 −257.81 20625 
[ k ]1 = [ k ]3 =
1500 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 2.1484 −257.81
 
 41250 
{Q } = {Q } = {0}
f 1 f 3
Member 2: A = 108 in.2 , I = 1300 in.4 , L = 300 in.
1620 0 0 −1620 0 0 
 2.6 390 0 −2.6 390 

 78000 0 −390 39000 
[ k ]2 =
1620 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 2.6 −390 
 
 78000 
2 ( 25 )
FAb = FAe = 0; FSb = FSe = = 25k
2
2 ( 25 )
2
FM b = − FM e = = 104.17 k- ft = 1250 k- in .
12
 0 
 25 
 
 1250 
{Q } f = 
 0 
2
 25 
 
 −1250 
141
6.12 E = 10000 ksi.
Member 1: A = 10.3 in.2 , I = 285 in.4 , L = 268.33 in .
383.86 0 0 −383.86 0 0 
 1.7702 237.5 0 −1.7702 237.5 

 42485 0 −237.5 21243 
[ k ]1 =  383.86 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 1.7702 −237.5
 
 42485 
1 268.33
FAb = FAe = ( sin 63.435° ) = 10 k
12 2
1 268.33
FSb = FSe = ( cos63.435° ) = 5k
12 2
( 268.33) = 223.61 k - in.
2
1
FM b = − FM e = ( cos63.435° )
12 12
 10 
 5 
 
 223.61 
{Q f }1 =  10 
 
 5 
 
 −223.61
Member 2: A = 9.12in .2 , I = 375in.4 , L = 300 in.

304 0 0 −304 0  0
 1.6667 250 0 −1.6667 250 

 50000 0 −250 25000 
[ k ]2 =
304 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 1.6667 −250 
 
 50000 
FAb = FAe = 0
1 2
FSb =  7 ( 25 )  + 3 ( 25 )  = 16.25 k
20 20
3
FSe = ( 25 ) − 16.25 = 21.25 k
2
1( 25 ) 2 ( 25 )
FM b = 3 ( 25 )  +  2 ( 25 )  = 72.917 k -ft = 875 k - in.
60 60 
25
FM e = 1{−2 ( 25 )} − 2 ( 25 )  + 16.25 ( 25 ) − 72.917 = −83.333 k -ft = −1000 k - in.
6  
142
 0 
 16.25 
 
 875 
{Q } f = 
 0 
2
 21.25 
 
 −1000 
143
6.13
0 ≤ x ≤ l1 Qa = − FAb
l1 ≤ x ≤ L Qa = − FAb + W
1 L
EA 0
uxe = Qa dx
1  l1
− FAb dx +  ( − FAb + W ) dx 
L
=

EA  0 l1 
1
=  − FAb l1 + ( − FAb L + WL ) − ( − FAb l1 + Wl1 ) 
EA 
1 1
=  − FAb L + W ( L − l1 )  = ( −FAb L + Wl2 )
EA EA
By setting, uxe = 0 , we obtain
1
( −FAb L + Wl2 ) = 0
EA
Wl2
FAb =
L
By applying the equation of equilibrium F x = 0 to the free body of the member,
we obtain
Wl2
− W + FAe = 0
L
Wl1
FAe =
L
144
6.14 E = 70 (106 ) k N /m 2 , A = 0.00457 m 2 , I = 34.5 (10−6 ) m 4 .
Member 1: L = 10 m.
31990 0 0 −31990 0 0 
 28.98 144.9 0 −28.98 144.9 

 966 0 −144.9 483 
[ k ]1 =  31990 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 28.98 −144.9 
 
 966 
{Q } = {0}
f 1
167.97 kN 
 −17.636 kN 
 
 −58.196 kN ⋅ m 
{Q}1 = [ k ]1 {u}1 + {Q f }1 =  
 −167.97 kN 
17.636 kN 
 
 −118.17 kN ⋅ m 
Equilibrium Check:
+ ↑  Fx = 0 167.97 − 167.97 = 0 checks
←  Fy = 0 − 17.636 + 17.636 = 0 checks

+
M = 0 − 58.196 − 118.17 + 17.636 (10 ) = −0.006 ≈ 0 checks
Member 2: L = 13 m.
24608 0 0 −24608 0 0 
 13.191 85.74 0 −13.191 85.74 

 743.08 0 −85.74 371.54 
[ k ]2 =
24608 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 13.191 −85.74 
 
 743.08 
15 (13)
FAb = FAe = 0; FSb = FSe = = 97.5 kN
2
145
15 (13 )
2
FM b = − FM e = = 211.25 kN ⋅ m
12
 0   228.58 kN 
 97.5  86.728 kN 
   
 211.25  118.17 kN ⋅ m 
{Q } =  {Q}2 = [ k ]2 {u}2 + Q f  =  
 −228.58 kN 
f
 0 
2 2
 97.5  108.27 kN 
   
 −211.25  −258.2 kN ⋅ m 
Equilibrium Check:
+   Fx = 0 228.58 − 228.58 = 0 checks
+   Fy = 0 86.728 − 15 (13 ) + 108.27 ≈ 0 checks
M (2) = 0 118.17 − 15 (13)( 6.5 ) − 258.2 + 108.27 (13) ≈ 0 checks
146
6.15 E = 29,000 ksi , A = 10.3 in.2 , I = 285 in.4
 2489.2 0 0 −2489.2 0 0 
 57.396 3443.8 0 −57.396 3443.8 

 275500 0 −3443.8 137750 
[ k ]1 =  
 2489.2 0 0 
 ( symmetric ) 57.396 −3443.8
 
 275500 
FAb = FAe = 0; FSb = 14 k; FSe = 6 k;

FM b = 240 k - in.; FM e = −160 k - in.
 0  128.12 k 
 14   −78.786 k 
   
 240   −5875 k - in. 
{Q f }1 =  0  {Q}1 = [ k ]1 {u}1 + {Q f }1 =  
   −128.12 k 
 6   98.786 k 
   
 −160   −5179.3 k - in.
Equilibrium Check:
+ ↑  Fx = 0 128.12 − 128.12 = 0 checks
+ 1
←  Fy = 0 − 78.786 − ( 0.33333)(120 ) + 98.786 = 0 checks
2
1
M  = 0 − 5875 −
2
( 0.33333)(120 )( 40 )
− 5179.3 + 98.786 (120 ) = 0.02 ≈ 0 checks
1914.7 0 0 −1914.7 0 0 
 26.125 2037.7 0 −26.125 2037.7 

 211923 0 −2037.7 105962 
[ k ]2 = 
 1914.7 0 0 
 ( Symmetric ) 26.125 −2037.7 
 
 211923 
FAb = FAe = −14.423k; FSb = FSe = −34.615k
FM b = − FMe = −1350 k - in.
147
 −14.423 111.62 k 
 −34.615 11.038 k 
   
 −1350  1942.5 k - in. 
{Q } =  {Q}2 = [ k ]2 {u}2 + {Q f }2 = 
 −14.423  −140.46 k 
f 2
 −34.615  −80.268 k 
   
 1350   5179.3 k - in.
Equilibrium Check:
+   Fx = 0 − 140.46 + 28.846 + 111.62 ≈ 0 checks
+   Fy = 0 − 80.268 + 69.231 + 11.038 ≈ 0 checks
 M = 0 5179.3 − 69.231( 78 ) + 1942.5 − 11.038 (156 ) ≈ 0 checks
Member 3: L = 204in .
1464.2 0 0 −1464.2 0 0 
 11.682 1191.6 0 −11.682 1191.6 
 
 162059 0 −1191.6 81029 
[ k ]3 =  
 1464.2 0 0 
 (Symmetric ) 11.682 −1191.6 
 
 162059 
{Q } = {0}
f 3
 −70.97 k 
 −20.192 k 
 
 −2176.6 k - in.
{Q}3 = [ k ]3 {u}3 = 
70.97 k 
20.192 k 
 
 −1942.5 k - in. 
Equilibrium Check:
+   Fx = 0 − 70.97 + 70.97 = 0 checks
+   Fy = 0 − 20.192 + 20.192 = 0 checks
 M = 0 − 2176.6 − 1942.5 + 20.192 ( 204 ) ≈ 0 checks
148
6.16 Member 1: cosθ = 0, sin θ = 1
 0 1 0 0 0 0
 −1 0 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]1 =  
 0 0 0 0 1 0
 0 0 0 −1 0 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1
Member 2: cosθ = 1, sin θ = 0
[T ]2 = [ I ]
149
6.17 Member 1: cosθ = −0.6, sin θ = 0.8
 −0.6 0.8 0 0 0 0
 −0.8 −0.6 0 0 0  0

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]1 =  
 0 0 0 −0.6 0.8 0 
 0 0 0 −0.8 −0.6 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
[T ]2 = [ I ]
150
6.18 Member 1: cosθ = 1, sinθ = 0
T1 = I
Member 2: cosθ = 0.8, sinθ = −0.6
 0.8 −0.6 0 0 0 0
 0.6 0.8 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
T2 =  
 0 0 0 0.8 −0.6 0 
 0 0 0 0.6 0.8 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
151
6.19 Member 1: cosθ = 0, sinθ = 1
 0 1 0 0 0 0
 −1 0 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
T1 =  
 0 0 0 0 1 0
 0 0 0 −1 0 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
Member 2: cosθ = −0.96, sinθ = 0.28
 −0.96 0.28 0 0 0
0
 −0.28 −0.96 0 0 0 
0

 0 0 1 0 0
0
T2 =  
 0 0 0 −0.96 0.28 0 
 0 0 0 −0.28 −0.96 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
152
6.20 Members 1 and 3: cosθ = 0, sin θ = 1
 0 1 0 0 0 0
 −1 0 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]1 = [T ]3 = 
 0 0 0 0 1 0
 0 0 0 −1 0 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1
[T ]2 = [ I ]
153
6.21 Member 1: cosθ = 0.44721, sin θ = 0.89443
 0.44721 0.89443 0 0 0 0
 −0.89443 0.44721 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]1 =  
 0 0 0 0.44721 0.89443 0 
 0 0 0 −0.89443 0.44721 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 

[T ]2 = [ I ]
154
 0 1 0 0 0 0
 −1 0 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]1 =  
 0 0 0 0 1 0
 0 0 0 −1 0 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1
From the solution of Problem 6.14, we obtain
167.97 kN 
 −17.636 kN 
 
 −58.196 kN ⋅ m 
{Q}1 =  
 −167.97 kN 
17.636 kN 
 
 −118.17 kN ⋅ m 
 0 
 0 
 
 0 
{v}1 = [T ]1 {u}1 = 
T

 0.012251m 
 −0.0052507 m 
 
 −0.12416 rad 
 17.636 kN 
 167.97 kN 
 
 −58.196 kN ⋅ m 
{F}1 = [T ]1 {Q}1 = 
T

 −17.636 kN 
 −167.97 kN 
 
 −118.17 kN ⋅ m 
Equilibrium Check:
+  FX = 0 17.636 − 17.636 = 0 checks
→
+ ↑  FY = 0 167.97 − 167.97 = 0 checks
 M = 0 − 58.196 − 118.17 + 17.636 (10 ) ≈ 0 checks
155
Member 2: cosθ = 0.92308, sin θ = 0.38462
 0.92308 0.38462 0 0 0 0
 −0.38462 0.92308 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]2 =
0 0 0 0.92308 0.38462 0 


 0 0 0 −0.38462 0.92308 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
228.58 kN   0.012251m 
86.728 kN   −0.0052507m 
   
118.17 kN ⋅ m   −0.12416 rad 
{Q}2 {v}2 = [T ]2 {u}2
T
=  = 
 −228.58 kN   0 
108.27 kN   0 
   
 −258.2 kN ⋅ m   0 
177.64 kN 
167.97 kN 
 
118.17 kN ⋅ m 
{F}2 = [T ]2 {Q}2
T
= 
 −252.64 kN 
12.026 kN 
 
 −258.2 kN ⋅ m 
Equilibrium Check:
 5
+  FX = 0 177.64 + 15 (13 )   − 252.64 = 0 checks
→
 13 
 12 
+ ↑  FY = 0 167.97 − 15 (13 )   + 12.026 ≈ 0 checks
 13 
 M = 0 118.17 − 15 (13)( 6.5 ) − 258.2 + 252.64 ( 5 ) + 12.026 (12 ) ≈ 0 checks
156
0 1 0 0 0 0
 −1 0 0 0 0 0 

0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]1 =  0 0 0 0 1 0


0 0 0 −1 0 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
128.12 k 
 −78.786 k 
 
 −5875 k - in. 
{Q}1 =  
 −128.12 k 
 98.786 k 
 
 −5179.3k - in.
 0 
 0 
 
 0 
{v}1 = [T ]1 {u}1 = 
T

 −2.0939in. 
 −0.05147in. 
 
 0.0079542 rad 
 78.786 k 
128.12 k 
 
 −5875k - in. 
{F}1 = [T ]1 {Q}1 = 
T

 −98.786 k 
 −128.12 k 
 
 −5179.3 k - in.
Equilibrium Check:
1
+  FX = 0 78.786 +
→
( 0.33333)(120 ) − 98.786 = 0 checks
2
+ ↑  FY = 0 128.12 − 128.12 = 0 checks
1
 M = 0 − 5875 − ( 0.33333)(120 )( 40 ) − 5179.3 + 98.786 (120 ) ≈ 0 checks
2
157
Member 2: cosθ = −0.92308 , sin θ = −0.38462
 −0.92308 −0.38462 0 0 0 0
 0.38462 −0.92308 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]2 =
0 0 0 −0.92308 −0.38462 0 


 0 0 0 0.38462 −0.92308 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
111.62 k   −1.8078in. 
11.038 k   −0.90922 in. 
   
1942.5k - in.  0.0028882 rad 
{Q}2 {v}2 = [T ]2 {u}2
T
=  = 
 −140.46 k   −2.0939in. 
 −80.268 k   −0.05147 in. 
   
5179.3k - in. 0.0079542 rad 
 −98.786 k 
 −53.119 k 
 
1942.5 k - in. 
{F}2 = [T ]2 {Q}2
T
= 
98.786 k 
128.12 k 
 
5179.3 k - in.
Equilibrium Check:
  FX = 0 98.786 − 98.786 = 0 checks
+
+ ↑  FY = 0 128.12 − 75 − 53.119 ≈ 0 checks
 M = 0 5179.3 − 75 ( 72 ) + 1942.5 − 53.119 (144 ) + 98.786 ( 60 ) ≈ 0 checks
158
Member 3: cosθ = −0.47059 , sin θ = 0.88235
 −0.47059 0.88235 0 0 0 0
 −0.88235 −0.47059 0 0 0  0

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]3 =
0 0 0 −0.47059 0.88235 0 


 0 0 0 −0.88235 −0.47059 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
 −70.97 k   0 
 −20.192 k   0 
   
 −2176.6 k - in.  0 
{Q}3 {v}3 = [T ]3 {u}3
T
=  = 
70.97 k   −1.8078 in. 
20.192 k   −0.90922 in. 
   
 −1942.5 k - in.  0.0028882 rad 
51.214 k 
 −53.119 k 
 
 −2176.6 k - in.
{F}3 = [T ]3 {Q}3
T
= 
 −51.214 k 
53.119 k 
 
 −1942.5k - in. 
Equilibrium Check:
  FX = 0 51.214 − 51.214 = 0 checks
+
+ ↑  FY = 0 − 53.119 + 53.119 = 0 checks
 M = 0 − 2176.6 − 1942.5 + 51.214 (180 ) − 53.119 ( 96 ) ≈ 0 checks
159
6.24 E = 29,000 ksi , A = 10.3in.2 , I = 510in.4
Member 1: L = 240 in. , cosθ = 0 , sin θ = 1

12.839 0 −1540.6 −12.839 0 −1540.6 
 1244.6 0 0 −1244.6 0 

 246500 1540.6 0 123250 
[ K ]1 =  12.839 0 1540.6 


 ( symmetric ) 1244.6 0 
 
 246500 
FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = FSe = 20 k, FM b = − FM e = 1200 k- in.
 −20 
 0 
 
 1200 
{Ff }1 =  −20 
 
 0 
 
 −1200 
Member 2: L = 360 in. , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0.
829.72 0 0 −829.72 0 0 
 3.804 684.72 0 −3.804 684.72 

 164333 0 −684.72 82167 
[ K ]2 =
829.72 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 3.804 −684.72 
 
 164333 
FAb = FAe = 0
FSb = FSe = 22.5 k, FMb = − FM e = 1350 k- in.
 0 
 22.5 
 
 1350 
{F } f = 
 0 
2
 22.5 
 
 −1350 
160
6.25 E = 200 (106 ) kN/m 2 , A = 0.013m 2 , I = 762 (10 −6 ) m 4 .
Member 1: L = 10 m, cosθ = −0.6, sin θ = 0.8
94770 −123922 −7315.2 −94770 123922 −7315.2 

 167058 −5486.4 123922 −167058 −5486.4 

 60960 7315.2 5486.4 30480 
[ K ]1 =  94770 −123922 7315.2 


 ( symmetric ) 167058 5486.4 
 
 60960 
FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = FSe = −62.5 kN, FMb = − FM e = −156.25 kN ⋅ m
50 
37.5 
 
 −156.25
{Ff }1 = 50 
 
37.5 
 
156.25 
Member 2: L = 12 m , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0

216667 0 0 −216667 0 0 
 1058.3 6350 0 −1058.3 6350 

 50800 0 −6350 25400 
[ K ]2 =
216667 0 0 


 ( symmetric ) 1058.3 −6350 
 
 50800 
FAb = FAe = 0
FSb = FSe = 144 kN, FMb = − FM e = 288 kN ⋅ m
 0 
 144 
 
 288 
{F } f = 
 0 
2
 144 
 
 −288 
161
6.26 E = 10,000 ksi; A = 8.84 in.2 ; I = 170 in.4
Member 1: L = 216 in.; cosθ = 1, sinθ = 0
409.26 0 0 − 409.26 0 0 
 2.0243 218.62 0 − 2.0243 218.62 

 31,481 0 − 218.62 15,741 
K1 =  
 409.26 0 0 
 (symmetric) 2.0243 − 218.62
 
 31,481 
 0 
 27 
FAb = FAe = 0  
 972 
FSb = FSe = 27 k Ff 1 =  
FM b = −FSe = 972 k - in.  0 
 27 
 
− 972
Member 2: L = 180 in. ; cosθ = 0.8, sinθ = −0.6
315.57 − 234.05 188.89 − 315.57 234.05 188.89 

 179.04 251.85 234.05 − 179.04 251.85 

 37,778 − 188.89 − 251.85 18,889 
K2 =  
 315.57 − 234.05 − 188.89 
 (symmetric) 179.04 − 251.85
 
 37,778 
 0 
 7.5 
FAb = FAe = −4.5 k  
 270 
FSb = FSe = 6 k Ff 2 =  
FM b = −FSe = 270 k - in.  0 
 7.5 
 
− 270
162
6.27 E = 200(106 ) kN/m 2 ; A = 0.016 m 2 ; I = 1,186(10−6 ) m 4
Member 1: L = 16 m ; cosθ = 0, sinθ = 1
694.92 0 − 5,559.4 − 694.92 0 − 5,559.4

 200,000 0 0 − 200,000 0 
 
 59,300 5,559.4 0 29,650 
K1 =  
 694.92 0 5,559.4 
 (symmetric) 200,000 0 
 
 59,300 
Ff 1 = 0
Member 2: L = 25 m; cosθ = −0.96, sinθ = 0.28
117,980 − 34,357 − 637.59 − 117,980 34,357 − 637.59

 10,203 − 2,186 34,357 − 10,203 − 2,186 

 37,952 637.59 2,186 18,976 
K2 =  
 117,980 − 34,357 637.59 
 (symmetric) 10,203 2,186 
 
 37,952 
 0 
 250 
FAb = FAe = 70 kN  
− 1,000
FSb = FSe = −240 kN Ff 2 =  
FM b = −FSe = −1,000 kN ⋅ m  0 
 250 
 
 1,000 
163
6.28 E = 4500 ksi.
Members 1 and 3: A = 80 in.2 , I = 550 in 4 , L = 240 in. , cosθ = 0 , sin θ = 1.
2.1484 0 −257.81 −2.1484 0 −257.81

 1500 0 0 −1500 0 

 41250 257.81 0 20625 
[ K ]1 = [ K ]3 =
2.1484 0 257.81 


 ( Symmetric ) 1500 0 
 
 41250 
{F } = {F } = {0}
f 1 f 3
Member 2: A = 108 in.2 , I = 1300 in.4 , L = 300 in. , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0
1620 0 0 −1620 0 0 
 2.6 390 0 −2.6 390 

 78000 0 −390 39000 
[ K ]2 =
1620 0 0 


 ( Symmetric ) 2.6 −390 
 
 78000 
FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = FSe = 25 k, FM b = − FMe = 1250 k- in.
 0 
 25 
 
 1250 
{F } f = 
 0 
2
 25 
 
 −1250 
164
6.29 E = 10,000ksi.
Member 1: A = 10.3in.2 , I = 285in.4 , L = 268.33in. , cosθ = 0.44721 ,

sin θ = 0.89443
78.188 152.84 −212.43 −78.188 −152.84 −212.43
 307.44 106.21 −152.84 −307.44 106.21 

 42485 212.43 −106.21 21243 
[ K ]1 =  78.188 152.84 212.43 


 ( Symmetric ) 307.44 −106.21
 
 42485 
FAb = FAe = 10 k, FSb = FSe = 5 k
FM b = − FM e = 223.61k - in.
 0 
 11.18 
 
 223.61 
{Ff }1 =  0 
 
 11.18 
 
 −233.61
Member 2: A = 9.12 in 2 . , I = 375in.4 , L = 300 in. , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0
304 0 0 −304 0 0 
 1.6667 250 0 −1.6667 250 

 50000 0 −250 25000 
[ K ]2 =
304 0 0 


 ( Symmetric ) 1.6667 −250 
 
 50000 
FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = 16.25 k, FSe = 21.25 k, FM b = 875 k - in., FM e = −1000 k - in.
 0 
 16.25 
 
 875 
{F } f = 
 0 
2
 21.25 
 
 −1000 
165
6.30 E = 70 (106 ) kN/m 2 , A = 0.00457m 2 , I = 34.5 (10 −6 ) m 4

28.98 0 −144.9 −28.98 0 −144.9 
 31990 0 0 −31990 0 

 966 144.9 0 483 
[ K ]1 =  28.98 0 144.9 


 ( Symmetric ) 31990 0 
 
 966 
{F } = {0}
f 1

 0  17.636 kN 
 0  167.97 kN 
   
 0   −58.196 kN ⋅ m 
{v}1 =   {F}1 = [ K ]1 {v}1 =  
 0.012251   −17.636 kN 
 −0.0052507   −167.97 kN 
   
 −0.12416   −118.17 kN ⋅ m 
Member 2: L = 13m , cosθ = 0.92308 , sin θ = 0.38462

20969 8731.8 −32.977 −20969 −8731.8 −32.977 
 3651.4 79.144 −8731.8 −3651.4 79.144 

 743.08 32.977 −79.144 371.54 
[ K ]2 =
20969 8731.8 32.977 


 ( Symmetric ) 3651.4 −79.144 
 
 743.08 
FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = FSe = 97.5 kN

FM b = − FM e = 211.25 kN ⋅ m
 −37.5 
 90 
 
 211.25 
{F } = 
 −37.5 
f 2
 90 
 
 −211.25
166
 0.012251 
 −0.0052507 
 
 −0.12416 
{v}2 = 
 0 
 0 
 
 0 
177.64 kN 
167.97 kN 
 
118.17 kN ⋅ m 
{F}2 = [ K ]2 {v}2 + {Ff }2 = 
 −252.64 kN 
12.026 kN 
 
 −258.2 kN ⋅ m 
Equilibrium Check:
The equilibrium equations check (see solution of Problem 6.22).
167
6.31 E = 29,000ksi, A = 10.3in.2 , I = 285in.4
Member 1: L = 120 in., cos θ = 0, sin θ = 1
57.396 0 −3443.8 −57.396 0 −3443.8 

 2489.2 0 0 −2489.2 0 

 275500 3443.8 0 137750 
[ K ]1 =  57.396 0 3443.8 


 ( Symmetric ) 2489.2 0 
 
 275500 
FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = 14 k, FSe = 6 k, FM b = 240 k- in., FMe = −160 k - in.

 −14 
 0 
 
 240 
{Ff }1 =  −6 
 
 0 
 
 −160 
 0 
 0 
 
 0 
{v}1 =  
 −2.0939 
 −0.05147 
 
 0.0079542 
78.786 k 
128.12 k 
 
 −5875 k - in. 
{F}1 = [ K ]1 {v}1 + {Ff }1 =  
 −98.786 k 
 −128.12 k 
 
 −5179.3k - in.
cosθ = −0.92308, sin θ = −0.38462
168
1635.4 670.52 783.74 −1635.4 −670.52 783.74 
 305.51 −1881 −670.52 −305.51 −1881 

 211923 −783.74 1881 105962 
[ K ]2 =
1635.4 670.52

−783.74 

 ( Symmetric ) 305.51 1881 
 
 211923 
FAb = FAe = −14.423 k, FSb = FSe = −34.615k, FMb = − FM e = −1350 k - in.
 0 
 37.5 
 
 −1350 
{F } f = 
 0 
2
 37.5 
 
 1350 
 −1.8078 
 −0.90922 
 
0.0028882 
{v}2 = 
 −2.0939 
 −0.05147 
 
0.0079542 
 −98.786 k 
 −53.119 k 
 
1942.5 k - in. 
{F}2 = [ K ]2 {v}2 + {Ff }2 = 
98.786 k 
128.12 k 
 
5179.3 k - in.
cosθ = −0.47059 , sin θ = 0.88235
333.35 −603.13 −1051.4 −333.35 603.13 −1051.4 
 1142.5 −560.76 603.13 −1142.5 −560.76 

 162059 1051.4 560.76 81029 
[ K ]3 =
333.35 −603.13 1051.4 


 ( Symmetric ) 1142.5 560.76 
 
 162059 
169
{F } = {0}
f 3

 0  51.214 k 
 0   −53.119 k 
   
 0   −2176.6 k - in.
{v}3 =   {F}3 = [ K ]3 {v}3 = 
 −1.8078   −51.214 k 
 −0.90922  53.119 k 
   
 0.0028882   −1942.5k - in. 
Equilibrium Check:
The equilibrium equations check (see solution of Problem 6.23).
170
6.32
NDOF = 3, NR = 6
The member [K] matrices and {Ff } vectors are given in the solution of Problem 6.24.
Member Code Numbers:

Member 1: 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3
Member 2: 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9
Structure Stiffness Matrix: (Units: kips and inches)
1 2 3
842.56 0 1540.6  1
[ S ] =  0 1248.4 684.72  2

1540.6 684.72 410833 3
Structure Fixed-Joint Force Vector and Equivalent Joint Loads:

 −20 k  1
{Pf } = − {Pe } = 22.5 k  2
150 k- in. 3
171
6.33
NDOF = 3, NR = 6
The member [K] matrices and {Ff } vectors are given in the solution of Problem 6.25.

Member 1: 1, 7, 2, 4, 5, 6
Member 2: 1, 7, 2, 8, 9, 3
Structure Stiffness Matrix: (Units: kN and meters)
1 2 3
 311437 −7315.2 0 1
[ S ] = −7315.2 111760 25400  2

 0 25400 50800  3

 50 kN 1
{Pf } = −{Pe } = 131.75 kN ⋅ m  2

 −288 kN ⋅ m  3
172
6.34
NDOF = 2 ; NR = 7
The member K matrices and Ff vectors are given in the solution of Problem 6.26.
Member 1: 3, 4, 5, 1, 6, 2
Member 2: 1, 6, 2, 7, 8, 9
1 2
724.83 188.89  1
S= 
188.89 69, 259  2
 0 1
Pf = −Pe =  
 −702 k-in. 2
173
6.35
NDOF = 2 ; NR = 7
The member K matrices and Ff vectors are given in the solution of Problem 6.27.
Member 1: 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 2
Member 2: 6, 1, 2, 7, 8, 9
Structure Stiffness Matrix: (Units: kN and meters)
1 2
210,203 − 2,186 1
S= 
 − 2,186 97,252  2
 250 kN  1
Pf = −Pe =  
 −1,000 kN ⋅ m  2
174
6.36
NDOF = 6, NR = 6
The member [K] matrices and {Ff } vectors are given in the solution if Problem 6.28.

Member 1: 7, 8, 9, 1, 2, 3
Member 2: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Member 3: 10, 11, 12, 4, 5, 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1622.1 0 257.81 −1620 0 0 1
 1502.6 390 0 −2.6 390  2

 119250 0 −390 39000  3
[S] =  1622.1 0

257.81  4

 (Symmetric) 1502.6 −390  5
 
 119250  6
 0 1
 25 k 2
 
 1250 k - in.  3
{Pf } = − {Pe } =  0  4
 
 25 k 5
 
 −1250 k - in. 6
175
6.37
NDOF = 4, NR = 5
The member [K] matrices and {Ff } vectors are given in the solution if Problem 6.29.

Member 1: 5, 6, 7, 1, 2, 3
Member 2: 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 4
1 2 3 4
382.19 152.84 212.43 0 1
152.84 309.11 143.79 250  2
[ S ] = 212.43 143.79 92485 25000  3
 
 0 250 25000 50000  4
Structure Fixed-Joint Force Vector and Equivalent Joint Loads
 0 1
 27.431 k  2
{Pf } = − {Pe } =  651.4 k - in.  3
 
 −1000 k - in. 4
176
6.38
NDOF = 6, NR = 6
Units: kN and meters
E = 30 (106 ) kN/m 2
Members 1 and 3: A = 0.075m 2 , I = 468 (10 −6 ) m 4 , L = 8 m , cosθ = 0 , sin θ = 1
329.06 0 −1316.3 −329.06 0 −1316.3

 281250 0 0 −281250 0 

 7020 1316.3 0 3510 
[ K ]1 = [ K ]3 =
329.06 0

1316.3 

 (symmetric) 281250 0 
 
 7020 
Member 2: A = 0.052 m 2 , I = 225 (10 −6 ) m 4 , L = 6 m , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0
 260000 0 0 −260000 0 0 
 375 1125 0 −375 1125 

 4500 0 −1125 2250 
[ K ]2 =
260000 0 0 


 (symmetric) 375 −1125
 
 4500 
177
Structure Stiffness Matrix:
260329 0 1316.3 −260000 0 0 
 281625 1125 0 −375 1125 

 11520 0 −1125 2250 
[S] =  260329 0 1316.3


 (symmetric) 281625 −1125 
 
 11520 
Joint Loads:
 75 kN 
0 
 
0 
{P} = [ S ]{d} =  
0 
0 
 
 −50 kN ⋅ m 
178
6.39
NDOF = 8, NR = 4
Units: kips and inches
E = 10000 ksi, A = 14.1 in.2 , I = 184 in .4
Member 1: L = 129.8 in. , cosθ = 0.5547 , sin θ = 0.83205
9 10 1 2 3 4
341.23 496.7 −545.22 −341.23 −496.7 −545.22  9
 755.15 363.48 −496.7 −755.15 363.48  10

 56703 545.22 −363.48 28351  1
[ K ]1 =  341.23 496.7

545.22  2

 ( Symmetric ) 755.15 −363.48  3
 
 56703  4
Member 2: L = 134.16 in. , cosθ = 0.98387 , sin θ = 0.17889

2 3 4 5 6 7
1017.6 183.36 −109.72 −1017.6 −183.36 −109.72  2
 42.481 603.44 −183.36 −42.481 603.44  3

 54858 109.72 −603.44 27429  4
[ K ]2 =
1017.6 183.36 109.72  5


 ( Symmetric ) 42.481 −603.44  6
 
 54858  7
179
Member 3: L = 150.36 in. , cosθ = −0.47885, sin θ = 0.8779
11 12 8 5 6 7
220.03 −391.48 −428.7 −220.03 391.48 −428.7  11
 724.22 −233.83 391.48 −724.22 −233.83 12

 48949 428.7 233.83 24475  8
[ K ]3 =
220.03

−391.48 428.7  5

 ( Symmetric ) 724.22 233.83  6
 
 48949  7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
56703 545.22 −363.48 28351 0 0 0 1 0
 1358.8 680.06 435.5 −1017.6 −183.36 −109.72 0  2

 797.63 239.96 −183.36 −42.481 603.44 0 3
 
111561 109.72 −603.44 27429 0 4
[ S ] =  1237.6 −208.13 538.41 428.7  5
 
 ( Symmetric ) 766.7 −369.61 233.83 6
 103808 24475  7
 
 48949  8
Joint Loads:
0 1
0 2
 
 −30 k 3
 
 −180 k- in. 4
{P} = [ S ]{d} =  5
45 k
 
0 6
 240 k- in.  7
 
 0  8
180
6.40
NDOF = 2
NR = 7
E = 200 (106 ) kN/m 2
A = 0.0118m 2
I = 554 (10 −6 ) m 4
Member Stiffness Matrices:

3 4 5 6 1 2
393333 0 0 −393333 0 3 0
 6155.6 18467 0 −6155.6 18467  4

 73867 0 −18467 36933  5
[ K ]1 = [ k ]1 =  393333 0 0 6


 ( Symmetric ) 6155.6 −18467  1
 
 73867  2
Member 2: L = 6 m, cosθ = 0, sin θ = 1

7 8 9 6 1 2
6155.6 0 −18467 −6155.6 0 −18467  7
 393333 0 0 −393333 0  8

 73867 18467 0 36933  9
[ K ]2 =
6155.6 0

18467  6

 ( Symmetric ) 393333 0 1
 
 73867  2
181
1 2 1 2
6155.6 + 393333 −18467  1  399489 −18467  1
[S] =  −18467
=
73867 + 73867  2  −18467 147733  2

Member Fixed-End Force Vectors:
Member 1:
 0 3
 90  4
 
 90  5
{Ff }1 = {Q f }1 =  0  6
 
 90  1
 
 −90  2
Member 2:
 −50  7
 0 8
 
 75  9
{F } = 
 −50  6
f 2
 0 1
 
 −75  2
Structure Fixed-Joint Force Vector:
{P } = −90 − 75 2 =  −165 2

90 1 90 1
f
   
Joint Load Vector: {P} = {0}
Joint Displacements: By solving the equations {P} − {Pf } = [ S ]{d} , we obtain
 −0.17467m  1
{ d} =   2 × 10
−3
 1.095rad 
Member End Displacements and End Forces:
182
Member 1: [T ]1 = [ I ]
 0 3
 0 4
 
 0 5
{u}1 = {v}1 =   × 10
−3
 0  6
 −0.17467  1
 
 1.095  2
 0 3
 111.3 k N  4
 
 133.67 kN ⋅ m  5
{F}1 = {Q}1 = [ k ]1 {u}1 + {Q f }1 =  
 0 6
 68.703 kN  1
 
 −5.8872 kN ⋅ m  2
Member 2: [ k ]2 = [ k ]1
 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0
 0 8  −1 0 0 0 0 0 
  
 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0
{v}2 =  × 10 ,
−3
[T ]2 = 
 0  6 0 0 0 0 1 0
 −0.17467  1 0 0 0 −1 0 0 
   
 1.095  2  0 0 0 0 0 1 
 0   0 
 0   50 
   
 0   75 
{u}2 = [T ]2 {v}2 =
−0.17467
 × 10 ,
−3
{Q } f = 
   0 
2
 0   50 
   
 1.095   −75
68.703 kN 
 70.222 kN 
 
115.44 kN ⋅ m 
{Q}2 = [ k ]2 {u}2 + {Q f }2 = 
 −68.703 kN 
 29.778 kN 
 
 5.8872 kN ⋅ m 
183
 −70.222  7
68.703  8
 
115.44  9
{F}2 = [T ]2 {Q}2
T
= 
 −29.778  6
 −68.703  1
 
 5.8872  2
Reactions:
 0 3
 111.3 kN  4
 
133.67 kN ⋅ m  5
 
{R} =  −29.778 kN  6
 −70.222 kN  7
 
 68.703 kN  8
115.44 kN ⋅ m  9
 
184
6.41
NDOF = 2, NR = 7
E = 4000 ksi, A = 96 in 2 , I = 512 in 4 .

3 4 5 1 6 2
 2133.3 0 0 −2133.3 0 3 0
 4.214 379.26 0 −4.214 379.26  4

 45511 0 −379.26 22756  5
[ K ]1 = [ k ]1 =  2133.3 0 0 1


 ( Symmetric ) 4.214 −379.26  6
 
 45511  2
 0 3
 15  4
 
 450  5
{Ff }1 = {Q f }1 =  0  1
 
 15  6
 
 −450  2
Member 2: L = 156 in. , cosθ = 0.38462 , sin θ = 0.92308

1 6 2 7 8 9
369.65 871.62 −466.09 −369.65 −871.62 −466.09  1
 2098.4 194.2 −871.62 −2098.4 194.2  6

 52513 466.09 −194.2 26256  2
[ K ]2 =
369.65 871.62

466.09  7

 ( Symmetric ) 2098.4 −194.2  8
 
 52513  9
185
FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = 7.8306 k, FSe = 1.9196 k,
FM b = 159.23k- in., FMe = −78.428k- in .
 −7.2283  1
3.0118  6
 
159.23  2
{F } = 
 −1.7719  7
f 2
0.7383  8
 
 −78.428  9
1 2
2133.3 + 369.65 −466.09  1
[S] =  −466.09 45511 + 52513 2

 2503 −466.09 
= 
 −466.09 98024 
{P } = −450 + 159.23 2 =  −290.77

−7.2283 1 −7.2283
f
   
Joint Load Vector : {P} = {0}
Joint Displacements: By solving the equations {P} − {Pf } = [ S ]{d} , We obtain
 0.0034433 in.  1
{ d} =  
 0.0029828 rad  2
Member 1: [T ]1 = [ I ]
 0 3  −7.3457 k 3
 0 4 16.132 k 4
   
 0 5 517.88 k- in.  5
{u}1 = {v}1 =   {F}1 = {Q}1= [ k ]1 {u}1 + {Q f }1 =  
 0.0034433  1 7.3457 k 1
 0 6 13.869 k 6
   
 0.0029828  2  −314.26 k- in. 2
186
Member 2:
2461.5 0 0 −2461.5 0 0 
 6.4735 504.93 0 −6.4735 504.93 

 52513 0 −504.93 26256 
[ k ]2 =
2461.5 0 0 


 ( Symmetric ) 6.4735 −504.93
 
 52513 
 0   0.0034433  1
 7.8306   0 6
   
 159.23   0.0029828  2
{Q } f =  {v}2 = 
 0   0 7
2
 1.9196   0 8
   
 −78.428   0  9
 0.38462 0.92308 0 0 0 0
 −0.92308 0.38462 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]2 =
0 0 0 0.38462 0.92308 0 


 0 0 0 −0.92308 0.38462 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
 0.0013243 
 −0.0031784 
 
 0.0029828 
{u}2 = [T ]2 {v}2 = 
 0 
 0 
 
 0 
3.2599 k 
9.3161 k 
 
314.26 k - in. 
{Q}2 = [ k ]2 {u}2 + {Q f }2 = 
 −3.2599 k 
0.43406 k 
 
 −1.7167 k - in.
187
 −7.3457 k 1
6.5923 k 6
 
314.26 k - in.  2
{F}2 = [T ]2 {Q}2
T
= 
 −1.6545 k 7
 −2.8422 k 8
 
 −1.7167 k - in. 9
Reactions:
 −7.3457  3  −7.3457 k 
 16.132  4  16.132 k 
   
 517.88  5  517.88 k - in. 
   
{R} = 13.869 + 6.5923 6 =  20.461 k 
 −1.6545  7  −1.6545 k 
   
 −2.8422  8  −2.8422 k 
 −1.7167  9  −1.7167 k - in.
   
188
6.42
NDOF = 3
NR = 6
E = 29000 ksi
A = 10.3in 2 .
I = 510 in 4 .
Structure Stiffness Matrix and Fixed-Joint Force Vector: From the solution of Problem 6.32,
we obtain
1 2 3
842.56 0 1540.6  1  −20  1
[ S ] =  0 1248.4 684.72  2

{Pf } = 22.5 2
1540.6 684.72 410833 3  150  3
Joint Load Vector:

 0 1
{P} =  0  2
 −900  3
Joint Displacements:
By solving the equations {P} − {Pf } = [ S ]{d} , we obtain
 0.028556 in.  1
{d} =  −0.016578 in.  2
 −0.0026352 rad  3
189
The member [k] matrices and {Q f } vectors are given in the solution of Problem 6.7, and the
member [T] matrices are given in the solution of Problem 6.16.
Member 1:
 0 4  0 
 0 5  0 
   
 0 6  0 
{v}1 =   {u}1 = [T ]1 {v}1 =  
 0.028556  1  −0.016578 
 −0.016578  2  −0.028556 
   
 −0.0026352  3  −0.0026352 
20.633 k 
16.307 k 
 
919.2 k - in. 
{Q}1 = [ k ]1 {u}1 + {Q f }1 =  
 −20.633 k 
23.693 k 
 
 −1805.6 k - in.
 −16.307  4
 20.633  5
 
 919.2  6
{F}1 = [T ]1 {Q}1 = 
T

 −23.693  1
 −20.633  2
 
 −1805.6  3
Member 2:
 0.028556  1
 −0.016578  2
 
 −0.0026352  3
{u}2 = {v}2 = 
 0 7
 0 8
 
 0  9
23.693 k 1
20.633 k 2
 
905.59 k - in.  3
{F}2 = {Q}2 = [ k ]2 {u}2 + {Q f }2 = 
 −23.693 k 7
24.367 k 8
 
 −1577.9 k - in. 9
190
Reactions:
 −16.307 k 4
 20.633 k 5
 
 919.2 k - in.  6
{R} =  
 −23.693 k 7
 24.367 k 8
 
 −1577.9 k - in. 9
191
6.43
NDOF = 3, NR = 6
E = 200 (106 ) kN/m 2 , A = 0.013m 2 , I = 762 (10 −6 ) m 4 .
we obtain
1 2 3
 311437 −7315.2 0 1  50  1
[ S ] = −7315.2 111760 25400  2

{Pf } = 131.75 2
 0 25400 50800  3  −288  3
Joint Load Vector:

 0 1
{P} =  −150  2
 0  3
 −0.00026195m  1
{d} =  −0.0043172 rad  2
 0.0078279 rad  3

The member [k] matrices and {Q f } vectors are given in the solution of Problem 6.8, and the
member [T] matrices are given in the solution of Problem 6.17.
192
Member 1:
 −0.00026195 1  0.00015717 
 0 7  0.00020956 
   
 −0.0043172  2  −0.0043172 
{v}1 =   {u}1 = [T ]1 {v}1 =  
 0 4  0 
 0 5  0 
   
 0  6  0 
 40.864 kN 
 −101.59 kN 
 
 −417.51 kN ⋅ m 
{Q}1 = [ k ]1 {u}1 + {Q f }1 =  
 −40.864 kN 
 −23.406 kN 
 
 26.577 kN ⋅ m 
 56.754  1
 93.645  7
 
 −417.51 2
{F}1 = [T ]1 {Q}1 = 
T

 43.244  4
 −18.648  5
 
 26.577  6
Member 2:
 −0.00026195 1
 0 7
 
 −0.0043172  2
{u}2 = [ v ]2 =  
 0 8
 0 9
 
 0.0078279  3
 −56.756 kN  1
 166.29 kN  7
 
 267.51 kN ⋅ m  2
{F}2 = {Q}2 = [ k ]2 {u}2 + {Q f }2 = 
 56.756 kN  8
 121.71 kN  9
 
 0  3
193
Reactions:
 43.244 kN  4
 −18.648 kN  5
 
 26.577 kN ⋅ m  6
{R} =  
 259.94 kN  7
 56.756 kN  8
 
121.71 kN  9
194
6.44
NDOF = 2 ; NR = 7
E = 10,000 ksi ; A = 8.84 in.2 ; I = 170 in.4
Structure Stiffness Matrix and Fixed-Joint Force Vector: From the solution of Problem
6.34, we obtain
1 2
724.83 188.89  1  0 1
S=  Pf =  
188.89 69, 259  2 − 702 2
Joint Load Vector: P=0
Joint Displacements: By solving the equations P − Pf = Sd, we obtain
− 0.0026433 in. 1
d= 
 0.010143 rad  2
Member End Displacements and Forces: The member k matrices and Qf vectors are given
in the solution of Problem 6.9, and the member T matrices are given in the solution of
Problem 6.18.
Member 1:
 0 3  1.0818 k  3
 0 4  29.217 k 
    4
 0 5  1,131.7 k - in.  5
u1 = v 1 =   F1 = Q1 = k1 u 1 + Q f1 =  
− 0.0026433 1  −1.0818 k  1
 0 6  24.783 k  6
   
 0.010143  2  −652.68 k - in. 2
195
Member 2:
− 0.0026433 1 − 0.0021146
 0 6  − 0.001586 
   
 0.010143  2  0.010143 
v2 =   u 2 = T2 v 2 =  
 0 7  0 
 0 8  0 
   
 0  9  0 
 −5.5385 k   1.0818  1
   10.673  6
 9.1876 k   
 652.68 k - in.   652.88 2
Q2 = k 2 u 2 + Q f 2 =   F2 = T2T Q 2 =  
 −3.4615 k  − 1.0818  7
 2.8124 k   4.3268  8
   
 −78.909 k - in.   − 78.909  9
Reactions:
 1.0818 k  3
 29.217 k  4
 
1,131.7 k - in.  5
 
R =  35.456 k  6
 −1.0818 k  7
 
 4.3268 k  8
 −78.909 k - in.
  9
196
6.45
NDOF = 2 ; NR = 7
E = 200(10 6 ) kN/m 2 ; A = 0.016 m 2 ; I = 1,186(10 −6 ) m 4
Structure Stiffness Matrix and Fixed-Joint Force Vector: From the solution of Problem
6.35, we obtain
1 2
210,203 − 2,186 1  250  1
S=  Pf =  
 − 2,186 97,252  2 − 1,000 2
Joint Load Vector: P=0
Joint Displacements: By solving the equations P − Pf = Sd, we obtain
 −0.0010826 m  1
d= 
 0.010258 rad  2
Member End Displacements and Forces: The member k matrices and Qf vectors are given
in the solution of Problem 6.10, and the member T matrices are given in the solution of
Problem 6.19.
Member 1:
 0 3  0 
 0 4  0 
   
 0 5  0 
v1 =   u1 = T1 v 1 =  
 0 6 − 0.0010826
− 0.0010826 1  0 
   
 0.010258  2  0.010258 
197
 216.53 kN  − 57.029 3
 57.029 kN   216.53  4
   
304.16 kN ⋅ m   304.16 5
Q1 = k1u1 + Qf 1 =   F1 = T1T Q1 =  
 −216.53 kN   57.029  6
 −57.029 kN  − 216.53 1
   
 608.31 kN ⋅ m   608.31  2
Member 2:
 0 6 − 0.00030314
− 0.0010826 1  0.0010393 
   
 0.010258  2  0.010258 
v2 =   u 2 = T2 v 2 =  
 0 7  0 
 0 8  0 
   
 0  9  0 
 31.198 kN   30.656  6
   
 −216.45 kN   216.53  1
 −608.31 kN ⋅ m   −608.31  2
Q2 = k 2 u 2 + Q f 2 =   F2 = T2T Q2 =  
 108.8 kN   −30.656  7
 −263.55 kN   283.47  8
   
 1197 kN ⋅ m   1197  9
Reactions:
 −57.029 kN  3
 
 216.53 kN  4
 304.16 kN ⋅ m  5
 
R =  87.686 kN  6
 −30.656 kN  7
 
 283.47 kN  8
 1197 kN ⋅ m 
  9
198
6.46
NDOF = 3
NR = 6
E = 29000 ksi
A = 14.7 in 2 .
I = 800 in 4 .
4 5 6 1 2 3
1421 0 0 −1421 0 4 0
 10.311 1546.7 0 −10.311 1546.7  5

 309333 0 −1546.7 154667  6
[ K ]1 = [ k ]1 =  1421 0 0 1


 ( symmetric ) 10.311 −1546.7  2
 
 309333  3
 0 4
 25  5
 
 1250  6
{Ff }1 = {Q f }1 =  0  1
 
 25  2
 
 −1250  3
199
Member 2: L = 300 in. , cosθ = −0.28 , sin θ = 0.96
7 8 9 1 2 3
120.91 −379.19 −1484.8 −120.91 379.19 −1484.8  7
 1310.4 −433.07 379.19 −1310.4 −433.07  8

 309333 1484.8 433.07 154667  9
[ K ]2 =
120.91

−379.19 1484.8  1

 ( symmetric ) 1310.4 433.07  2
 
 309333  3
{F } = {0}
f 2

1 2 3
 1541.9 −379.19 1484.8  1
[ S ] = −379.19 1320.7 −1113.6  2
 1484.8 −1113.6 618667  3

 0 1
{Pf } =  25  2
 −1250  3
Joint Load Vector:
 0 1
{P} =  0  2
 960  3
 −0.007902 in.  1
{d} =  −0.018198 in.  2
 0.0035584 rad  3
200
Member 1: [T ]1 = [ I ]
 0  11.229 k 
 0  30.692 k 
   
 0  1828.5 k - in. 
{u}1 = {v}1 =   {F}1 = {Q}1 = [ k ]1 {u}1 + {Q f }1 =  
 −0.007902   −11.229 k 
 −0.018198  19.309 k 
   
 0.0035584   −121.13 k - in.
Member 2: [ k ]2 = [ k ]1 , {v}2 = {v}1 , {Q f }2 = {0}

 −0.28 0.96 0 0 0 0
 −0.96 −0.28 0 0 0  0

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]2 =
0 −0.28 0.96 0 

 0 0
 0 0 0 −0.96 −0.28 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
 0   21.681 k 
 0   5.373 k 
   
 0   530.76 k - in.
{u}2 = [T ]2 {v}2 =  {Q}2 = [ k ]2 {u}2 = 
 −0.015257   −21.681 k 
 0.012681   −5.373 k 
   
 0.0035584  1081.1 k - in. 
 −11.229 
 19.309 
 
 530.76 
{F}2 = [T ]2 {Q}2
T
= 
 11.229 
 −19.309 
 
 1081.1 
Reactions:
11.229 k 4
30.692 k 5
 
1828.5 k - in.  6
{R} =  
 −11.229 k  7
19.309 k 8
 
530.76 k - in. 9
201
6.47
NDOF = 4, NR = 5
E = 10000 ksi
we obtain
1 2 3 4
382.19 152.84 212.43 0 1  0 1
152.84 309.11 143.79 250  2  27.431 2
[ S ] = 212.43 143.79 92485 25000  3 {Pf } =  651.4  3
   
 0 250 25000 50000  4  −1000  4
 0.062194 in.  1
 −0.13533in.  2
{d} =  
−0.014529 rad  3
 
 0.027941rad  4
The member [k] matrices and {Q f } vectors are given in the solution of Problem 6.12, and
the member [T] matrices are given in the solution of Problem 6.21.
Member 1:
 0 5  0 
 0 6  0 
   
 0 7  0 
{v}1 =   {u}1 = [T ]1 {v}1 =  
 0.062194  1  −0.093231
 −0.13533  2  −0.11615 
   
 −0.014529  3  −0.014529 
202
 45.788 k 
1.7551 k 
 
 −57.433 k - in. 
{Q}1 = [ k ]1 {u}1 + {Q f }1 =  
 −25.787 k 
8.245 k 
 
 −813.28 k - in.
 18.907  5
 41.739  6
 
 −57.433  7
{F}1 = [T ]1 {Q}1 = 
T

 −18.907  1
 −19.378  2
 
 −813.28  3
Member 2:
 0.062194  1
 −0.13533  2
 
 −0.014529  3
{u}2 = {v}2 = 
 0 8
 0 9
 
 0.027941  4
 18.907 k  1
 19.378 k  2
 
813.28 k - in. 3
{F}2 = {Q}2 = [ k ]2 {u}2 + {Q f }2 = 
 −18.907 k  8
 18.123 k  9
 
 0  4
Reactions:
18.907 k 5
 41.739 k 6
 
{R} =  −57.433 k - in. 7
 
 −18.907 k 8
18.123 k  9
203
6.48
NDOF = 6, NR = 6
E = 4500 ksi
we obtain
1 2 3 4 5 6
1622.1 0 257.81 −1620 1 0 0
 1502.6 390 0 −2.6 390  2

 119250 0 −390 39000  3
[S] =  1622.1 0

257.81  4

 ( symmetric ) 1502.6 −390  5
 
 119250  6
 0 1
 25  2
 
 1250  3
{Pf } =  0  4
 
 25  5
 
 −1250  6
204
Joint Load Vector:
30  1
 0 2
 
 0 3
{P} =  
 0 4
 0 5
 
 0  6
8.6898 in. 1
 −0.0093167 in. 2
 
 −0.029779 rad  3
{ d} =  
8.6781in. 4
 −0.024017 in.  5
 
 0.0014115 rad  6
Member End Displacements and End Forces: The member [k] matrices and {Q f } vectors
are given in the solution of Problem 6.11, and the member [T] matrices are given in the
solution of Problem 6.20.
Member 1:
 0   0 
 0   0 
   
 0   0 
{v}1 =   {u}1 =  
 8.6898   −0.0093167 
 −0.0093167   −8.6898 
   
 −0.029779   −0.029779 
13.975 k   −10.992 
10.992 k   13.975 
   
1626.2 k - in.  1626.2 
{Q}1 =   {F}1 =  
 −13.975 k   10.992 
 −10.992 k   −13.975 
   
1012 k - in.   1012 
205
Member 2:
8.6898  19.009 k 
 −0.0093167  13.975 k 
   
 −0.029779   −1012 k - in. 
{u}2 = {v}2 =  {F}2 = {Q}2 = 
8.6781   −19.009 k 
 −0.024017  36.025 k 
   
 0.0014115   −2295.5 k - in.
Member 3:
 0   0 
 0   0 
   
 0   0 
{v}3 =  {u}3 = 
 8.6781   −0.024017 
 −0.024017   −8.6781 
   
 0.0014115   0.0014115 
 36.025 k   −19.008 
 19.008 k   36.025 
   
 2266.4 k- in.  2266.4 
{Q}3 =  {F}3 = 
 −36.025 k   19.008 
 −19.008 k   −36.025
   
 2295.5 k- in.   2295.5 
Reactions:
 −10.992 k  7
13.975 k 8
 
1626.2 k - in.  9
{R} =  
 −19.008 k  10
36.025 k  11
 
 2266.4 k - in. 12
206
6.49
NDOF = 9, NR = 6
E = 29000 ksi
Members 1 and 4: L = 288 in. , A = 20 in.2 , I = 723in.4 , cosθ = 0 , sin θ = 1
10.533 0 −1516.7 −10.533 0 −1516.7 

 2013.9 0 0 −2013.9 0 

 291208 1516.7 0 145604 
[ K ]1 = [ k ]4 =
10.533 0 1516.7 


 ( Symmetric ) 2013.9 0 
 
 291208 
{F } = {F } = {0}
f 1 f 4
Member 2: L = 408 in. , A = 20.1 in .2 , I = 1830in.4 , cosθ = 0.88235,

sin θ = 0.47059
1114.4 589.33 −900.16 −1114.4 −589.33 −900.16 
 323.69 1687.8 −589.33 −323.69 1687.8 

 520294 900.16 −1687.8 260147 
[ K ]2 =
1114.4 589.33 900.16 


 ( Symmetric ) 323.69 −1687.8 
 
 520294 
207
1.5  16  408
FAb = FAe = = 12 k
12  34  2
1.5  30  408
FSb = FSe = = 22.5 k
12  34  2
1.5  30  ( 408 )
2
FM b = − FM e = = 1530 k - in.
12  34  12
 0 
 25.5 
 
 1530 
{F } f = 
 0 
2
 25.5 
 
 −1530 
Member 3: L = 408 in. , A = 20.1 in .2 , I = 1830 in.4 , cosθ = −0.88235,

sin θ = 0.47059
1114.4 −589.33 −900.16 −1114.4 589.33 −900.16 
 323.69 −1687.8 589.33 −323.69 −1687.8 

 520294 900.16 1687.8 260147 
[ K ]3 =
1114.4 −589.33 900.16 


 ( Symmetric ) 323.69 1687.8 
 
 520294 
FAb = FAe = 12 k, FSb = FSe = −22.5 k, FMb = − FM e = −1530 k - in.
 0 
 25.5 
 
 −1530 
{F } f = 
 0 
3
 25.5 
 
 1530 
208
Structure Fixed-Joint Force Vector: Joint Load Vector
 0  50 
 25.5  0 
   
 1530  0 
   
 0  0 
{Pf } =  51  {P} = 0 
 
 0  0 
 0  0 
   
 25.5  0 
   
 −1530  0 
Structure Stiffness matrix:
1124.9 589.33 616.55 −1114.4 −589.33 −900.16 0 0 0 
 2337.6 1687.8 −589.33 −323.69 1687.8 0 0 0 
 
 811502 900.16 −1687.8 260147 0 0 0 
 
 2228.7 0 1800.3 −1114.4 589.33 900.16 
[S ] =  647.37 0 589.33 −323.69 1687.8 
 
 1040588 −900.16 −1687.8 260147 
 ( Symmetric ) 1124.9 −589.33 616.55 
 
 2337.6 −1687.8 
 
811502 

 2.8978 in. 
 −0.02114 in. 
 
 −0.011687 rad 
 
3.5004 in. 
{d} =  −1.2117 in. 
 
0.0038711 rad 
 4.0992 in. 
 
 −0.029507 in. 
 −0.0038888 rad.
 
209
Member End Displacement and End Forces:
Member 1:
 0  0 1 0 0 0 0
 0   −1 0 0 0 0 0 
  
 0  0 0 1 0 0 0
{v}1 =   [T ]1 = 0 
 2.8978   0 0 0 1 0
 −0.02114  0 0 0 −1 0 0 
   
 −0.011687   0 0 0 0 0 1 
 0 
 0 
 
 0 
{u}1 =   {Q } = {0}
 −0.02114 
f 1
 −2.8978 
 
 −0.011687 
 2013.9 0 0 −2013.9 0 0 
 10.533 1516.7 0 −10.533 1516.7 

 291208 0 −1516.7 145604 
[ k ]1 =  2013.9 0 0 


 ( Symmetric ) 10.533 −1516.7 
 
 291208 
 42.573 k   −12.797 k 
12.797 k   42.573 k 
   
 2693.5 k - in.  2693.5 k - in. 
{Q}1 =   {F}1 =  
 −42.573 k  12.797 k 
 −12.797 k   −42.573 k 
   
 991.87 k - in. 991.87 k - in.
Member 2:
 2.8978  12 
 −0.02114   22.5 
   
 −0.011687  1530 
{v}2 =  {Q }f = 
3.5004  12 
2
 −1.2117  22.5 
   
 0.0038711   −1530 
210
 0.88235 0.47059 0 0 0 0
 −0.47059 0.88235 0 0 0 0 

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]2 =
0 0 0 0.88235 0.47059 0 


 0 0 0 −0.47059 0.88235 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
1428.7 0 0 −1428.7 0 0 
 9.3767 1912.8 0 −9.3767 1912.8 

 520294 0 −1912.8 260147 
[ k ]2 =
1428.7 0 0 


 ( Symmetric ) 9.3767 −1912.8 
 
 520294 
 2.547  52.861 k 
 −1.3823  20.057 k 
   
 −0.011687   −991.87 k - in.
{u}2 =  {Q}2 = 
 2.5184   −28.861 k 
 −2.7164  24.941 k 
   
 0.0038711   −4.395 k - in. 
Member 3: [ k ]3 = [ k ]2
 4.0922  12 
 −0.029507   −22.5 
   
 −0.0038888   −1530 
{v}3 =  {Q }f = 
3.5004  12 
3
 −1.2117   −22.5 
   
 0.0038711  1530 
 −0.88235 0.47059 0 0 0 0
 −0.47059 −0.88235 0 0 0  0

 0 0 1 0 0 0
[T ]3 =
0 0 0 −0.88235 0.47059 0 


 0 0 0 −0.47059 −0.88235 0 
 
 0 0 0 0 0 1 
211
 −3.6246  60.791k 
 −1.8997   −34.925 k 
   
 −0.0038888   −5074.2 k - in.
{u}3 =  {Q}3 = 
 −3.6588   −36.791k 
 −0.57811   −10.073 k 
   
 0.0038711   4.395 k - in. 
Member 4: [T ]4 = [T ]1 , [ k ]4 = [ k ]1 , {Q f }4 = {0}
 0   0 
 0   0 
   
 0   0 
{v}4 =  {u}4 = 
 4.0922   −0.029507 
 −0.029507   −4.0922 
   
 −0.0038888   −0.0038888 
 59.424 k   −37.203 
37.203 k   59.424 
   
 5640.4 k - in.  5640.4 
{Q}4 =  {F }4 = 
 −59.424 k   37.203 
 −37.203 k   −59.424 
   
 5074.2 k - in.  5074.2 
Reactions:
 −12.797 k 
 42.573 k 
 
 2693.5 k - in. 
{R} =  
 −37.203 k 
 59.424 k 
 
 5640.4 k - in.
212
6.50
NDOF = 12, NR = 6
E = 30 (106 ) kN/m 2
Members 1 through 4: A = 0.093m 2 , I = 720 (10 −6 ) m 4 , L = 6m , cosθ = 0 , sin θ = 1.
Member 5 and 6: A = 0.14m 2 , I = 2430 (10 −6 ) m 4 , L = 12 m , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0
FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = FSe = 72 kN, FM b = − FM e = 144 kN ⋅ m.

352400 0 0 −350000 0 0 −1200 0 −3600 0 0 0 

 930506 3037.5 0 −506.25 3037.5 0 −465000 0 0 0 0 
 
 53100 0 −3037.5 12150 3600 0 7200 0 0 0 
 352400 0 0 0 0 0 −1200 0 −3600 
 
 930506 −3037.5 0 0 0 0 −465000 0 
 
53100 0 0 0 3600 0 7200 
[ s] = 
 351200 0 3600 −350000 0 0 
 
 ( Symmetric ) 465506 3037.5 0 −506.25 3037.5 
 38700 0 −3037.5 12150 
 
 351200 0 3600 
 
 465506 −3037.5
 38700 
213
Structure Fixed-Joint Force Vector: Joint Load Vector:
 0  60 
 72  0
   
 144  0
   
 0  0
 72  0
   
 −144 
{P} =  
0
{Pf } =  0  30
   
 72  0
   
 144  0
 0  0
   
 72  0
 −144   0 
 0.050298m 
 −0.00023453m 
 
 −0.0069553 rad 
 
 0.050261m 
 −0.00038483m 
 
 −0.001564 rad 
Joint Displacements: {d} =  
0.080181m
 
 −0.0003697 m 
 
 −0.0062191rad 
 0.080062 m 
 
 −0.00055933m 
 0.0031773rad 
Member End Forces:
109.06 kN  178.94 kN 
35.319 kN   54.682 kN 
   
131 kN ⋅ m  169.68 kN ⋅ m 
{Q}1 =   {Q}2 = 
 −109.06 kN   −178.94 kN 
 −35.319 kN   −54.682 kN 
   
80.917 kN ⋅ m  158.42 kN ⋅ m 
214
62.857 kN  81.143 kN 
 −11.569 kN   41.57 kN 
   
 −37.357 kN ⋅ m  107.64 kN ⋅ m 
{Q}3 =  {Q}4 = 
 −62.857 kN   −81.143 kN 
11.569 kN   −41.57 kN 
   
 −32.056 kN ⋅ m  141.78 kN ⋅ m 
13.114 kN   41.564 kN 
 46.199 kN  62.857 kN 
   
 −43.56 kN ⋅ m  32.056 kN ⋅ m 
{Q}5 =  {Q}6 = 
 −13.114 kN   −41.564 kN 
 97.801 kN  81.143 kN 
   
 −266.06 kN ⋅ m   −141.78 kN ⋅ m 
Reactions:
 −35.319 kN 
109.06 kN 
 
131 kN ⋅ m 
{R} =  
 −54.682 kN 
178.94 kN 
 
169.68 kN ⋅ m 
215
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
“What, then, would you have me do?” asked the Mayor. “I did not
come to tell you what to do,” the Bishop said. “I am a Churchman,
not the Mayor of New York; but if I were the Mayor, I would examine
the laws of the State and see if there were not attached to the police
force a battery of artillery, and a company or so of infantry, and a
squadron of horse; and I think I should find that there were; and if so,
I should call them out. Moreover, I should send to Mr. Harper, the
Mayor-elect, who has been chosen by the votes of this party. I
should remind him that these men are his supporters; I should warn
him that if they carry out their designs there will be a riot; and I
should urge him to use his influence in preventing the public
reception of the delegates.”[5]
This characteristic stand of Bishop Hughes had its effect. No
public reception of the church burners took place, but for nearly two
weeks the Cathedral was guarded every night, and the mob which
threatened its destruction was kept at bay. During those dark days
Bishop Hughes found John Kelly to be one of the most prudent
young men in the Cathedral parish, energetic in danger, conservative
in conduct, and always responsive to the call of duty. His manly
bearing then may be said to have laid the foundation of that enduring
confidence in his judgment, and respect for his character, which the
Bishop ever afterwards felt and expressed. Mr. Kelly was not a
zealot, and there is not a tinge of bigotry in his nature. He was then,
as he is now, a true liberal, and has always declared that religion and
politics should be kept as wide apart as the poles. But he is the foe
of intolerance, and while despising the arts of the demagogue, no
man in New York has done more to uphold foreign citizens in their
rights, and to emancipate the ballot-box from persecution on the one
hand, and fraudulent voting on the other.
The Native American party finally developed into the notorious
Know-Nothing movement, the party of grips, and signs, and dark-
lanterns. In many of the election districts of New York no foreigner
dared approach the polls. The primaries were even worse, and were
conducted in defiant disregard of the election laws. In John Kelly’s
ward, which was a fair illustration of every other ward in the city, any
Irishman or German risked his life by going to the polls. Gangs of
repeaters and thugs, as far as they could, kept all foreigners from the
primaries. These tools of the Know-Nothing leaders would fill the
room where the election was held, take possession of the line, crowd
out their opponents by threats or violence, return again and again,
force their way, after passing the spot where the votes were
received, once more into the line, and repeat the farcical act of
voting a second and third time, keeping up the villany until relieved
by another squad of repeaters, who continued to enact the same
scenes until the close of the polls. A friendly police force connived at
these rascalities, and openly backed up the repeaters and ballot-box
stuffers whenever a determined citizen, in the exercise of his rights,
resisted expulsion from the line, or attempted to defend himself from
assault. So great became the terror these law-breakers inspired, that
opposition to them was practically at an end. This state of affairs was
more humiliating, since the majority of voters in the Fourteenth Ward
were known to be Democrats. John Kelly protested against these
outrages as a private citizen, and at a meeting of Democrats
declared his intention of attending the next primary election in the
Fourteenth Ward, then near at hand, and exercising his right of
voting at all hazards. Those who knew the man knew this was not an
idle boast, but many tried to dissuade him from the rash attempt,
which, if persisted in, would likely enough cost him his life.
The primary election was to take place in a hall, long since
removed, in the march of the city, which then stood on the corner of
Grand and Elizabeth Streets. The part of the room for the inspectors’
seats was protected by a high partition, and a box desk, like a bank
teller’s window, with a hole only large enough for a voter’s hand to
be put through in handing his ballot, to the receiving inspector, was
placed at one side of the partition. A narrow path in the main room,
fenced in by high rails, to allow but one voter to approach at a time,
afforded the only means of access to the polls. When the voter
handed in his ballot, that was the last he saw of it, as the partition
effectually shut off observation from without. As a matter of fact it
was the practice of the inspector to throw the vote into a waste
basket, on the floor at his feet, if it was not of the approved sort. This
mode of taking the vox populi had long been in practice, and was not
only an open evasion of the statute, which provided for the presence
of watchers for the several parties, whose legal right it was to see
that all had a fair opportunity to vote, but it was adopted with the
deliberate purpose of protecting the swindling inspectors from
detection while engaged in the nefarious work of making way with
legal ballots. On the day of the election John Kelly was early on the
scene, and was accompanied by a large number of the lawful voters
of the ward, who appointed him as their watcher at the polls. He and
his friends forced their way into the hall, and as the black hole,
behind which the frauds were practiced, was there in violation of the
statute, it was straightway demolished, in order to secure at least a
semblance of fairness to the voting about to take place. The Know-
Nothings were at first struck dumb with astonishment at this bold
step on the part of the Democrats. To defend themselves from
violence was as much as the latter had previously attempted. Rage
soon took the place of surprise, and a furious attack was made on
those who had removed the box screen from about the inspectors’
desk. John Kelly, who had been recognized as a Democratic
watcher, was also set upon by the gang of ballot-box stuffers. A
fierce scuffle ensued. But the Democrats outnumbered the Know-
Nothings, and drove them from the hall. The leaders of the latter
party, uttering vows of vengeance, declared they would soon return
with reinforcements, and make short work of Kelly and his party.
They repaired to the ship-carpenters’ quarters at the foot of Delaney
street, and soon the news of their discomfiture was spread abroad
among the thousands of mechanics in that part of the city. These
mechanics were, for the most part, engaged in ship building, for
those were the days when New York’s famous clipper ships whitened
the seas and brought back cargoes of commerce from all parts of the
world. The ship carpenters constituted a formidable body of athletic
men, whose influence at elections was cast on the side of the Know-
Nothings. It was not long before a body of these mechanics, over a
thousand in number, was drummed up in Delaney street and vicinity,
and marshalled by notorious Know-Nothing bullies, the crowd started
for the hall in Grand street to inflict condign punishment upon John
Kelly and the Fourteenth Ward Democrats, who had shown the
unprecedented audacity of interfering with the usual Know-Nothing
methods of carrying elections in that ward. In the meantime the
Democrats had not been idle, but had recruited their own ranks to
prepare for the threatened attack. Soon the two parties came into
collision, and a desperate encounter took place. But for a second
time the victory remained with the Democrats. The Know-Nothings,
unaccustomed to serious opposition, were not prepared for it now,
and advanced in a promiscuous manner, expecting to bear down
opposition and to have everything their own way. The Democrats
presented a compact front, and fought in companies of ten each.
The hall was cleared a second time of the assailing party. A great
multitude was now gathered in the streets threatening to tear down
or burn the building, when the Democrats suddenly sallied forth with
the precision of veterans, and struck the Know-Nothing mob at a
dozen different points simultaneously. The mob being gathered from
all parts of the city greatly exceeded the Democrats in numbers, but
the sub-divisions of tens on the part of the latter worked so well that
their onslaught became irresistible. Soon the mob were flying in all
directions, some seeking refuge in stores, others in private houses,
and the rest were pursued into and through the Bowery with great
impetuosity. “The hour was come and the man.” None knew it better
than the Know-Nothing Dirk Hatteraicks of New York. The effect of
that day’s work in the Fourteenth Ward was felt all over the city of
New York for years afterwards, and its immediate consequence was
to break the backbone of Know-Nothingism in the ward in which it
occurred. Thereafter Democrats, whether native or foreign born,
were not afraid to appear at election places. The moral effect was
salutary. The timid were reassured, the indifferent were roused into
interest in public affairs, and fair elections became more frequent in
New York city. The one strong man who had worked this revolution
was John Kelly. The Irish and German population looked upon him
as their deliverer, and from that day forth the Know-Nothing power
on the East side of the city dwindled into insignificance, and no
further attempts to stifle the voice of the majority took place. Kelly
became identified in the minds of the adopted citizens of all
nationalities, but especially of the Irish, who were chiefly aimed at, as
their champion. Henceforth it was not possible for this strong man,
this born leader of his fellows, to follow the bent of his inclinations
and remain in a private station. He was elected to the Board of
Aldermen, and next to the Congress of the United States. The Know-
Nothings, by their excesses in New York, had raised up an adversary
to their oath-bound secret organization who was destined to
accomplish as much in the Empire State for equal rights to all
citizens, native and foreign-born, as Alexander H. Stephens, in a
similar contest, wrought out in Georgia, and Henry A. Wise, by his
great anti-Know-Nothing campaign accomplished in Virginia.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Utica Observer, Sept. 16, 1879.
[2] Utica Observer, Sept. 16, 1879.
[3] New York World, Oct. 18, 1875.
[4] New York Herald October 26, 1877.
[5] Clarke’s Lives of the Deceased Bishops, vol. ii., pp. 111-112.
CHAPTER III.
THE GREAT COMMONER OF GEORGIA—SPEECH OF A. H.
STEPHENS—HENRY A. WISE OF ACCOMAC—HENRY
WINTER DAVIS—HIS CHARACTER—JOHN KELLY MEETS
HIM IN DEBATE—KELLY’S STANDING IN CONGRESS—HIS
CHARACTER DESCRIBED BY LEWIS CASS, BY A. H.
STEPHENS, AND JAMES GORDON BENNETT—THE ERA OF
KNOW-NOTHINGISM—KELLY’S PART IN ITS OVERTHROW.
The future historian of the United States, when he comes to treat
of that extraordinary movement in American politics called Know-
Nothingism, will not do justice to the subject unless he assigns the
post of honor in the work of its overthrow as a national organization
to Stephens of Georgia, Wise of Virginia, and Kelly of New York. A
glance at the great work accomplished by these three men is all that
can be attempted in this memoir.
“True Americanism,” said Alexander H. Stephens in his
memorable Anti-Know-Nothing contest in Georgia in 1855, “as I have
learned it, is like true Christianity—disciples in neither are confined to
any nation, clime or soil whatever. Americanism is not the product of
the soil; it springs not from the land or the ground; it is not of the
earth, or earthy; it emanates from the head and the heart; it looks
upward, and onward and outward; its life and soul are those grand
ideas of government which characterize our institutions, and
distinguish us from all other people; and there are no two features in
our system which so signally distinguish us from all other nations as
free toleration of religion and the doctrine of expatriation—the right of
a man to throw off his allegiance to any and every other State, prince
or potentate whatsoever, and by naturalization to be incorporated as
a citizen into our body politic. Both these principles are specially
provided for and firmly established in our Constitution. But these
American ideas which were proclaimed in 1789 by our ‘sires of ’76’
are by their ‘sons’ at this day derided and scoffed at. We are now
told that ‘naturalization’ is a ‘humbug,’ and that it is an impossibility.
So did not our fathers think. This ‘humbug’ and ‘impossibility’ they
planted in the Constitution; and a vindication of the same principle
was one of the causes of our second war of independence. Let no
man, then, barely because he was born in America, presume to be
imbued with real and true ‘Americanism,’ who either ignores the
direct and positive obligations of the Constitution, or ignores this, one
of its most striking characteristics. An Irishman, a Frenchman, a
German, or Russian, can be as thoroughly American as if he had
been born within the walls of the old Independence Hall itself. Which
was the ‘true American,’ Arnold or Hamilton? The one was a native,
the other an adopted son.”[6]
Mr. Stephens had declined to be a candidate for Congress in
1855, and the Know-Nothings taunted him with cowardice, because,
they said, if he should run he knew he was doomed to defeat. His
letter on Know-Nothingism to Judge Thomas, from which the
preceding extract is quoted, was denounced furiously by the Know-
Nothings, who loudly predicted that the letter would prove to be his
political winding-sheet. These taunts were published throughout the
country, and induced Mr. Stephens to change his mind, and re-enter
the field as a candidate for the Thirty-fourth Congress. In a speech at
Augusta, Georgia, in which he announced this purpose, he said: “I
have heard that it has been said that I declined being a candidate,
because a majority of the district were Know-Nothings, and I was
afraid of being beaten. Now, to all men who entertain any such
opinion of me, I wish to say that I was influenced by no such motive.
I am afraid of nothing on earth, or above the earth, or under the
earth, except to do wrong—the path of duty I shall ever endeavor to
travel, ‘fearing no evil,’ and dreading no consequences. Let time-
servers, and those whose whole object is to see and find out which
way the popular current for the day and hour runs, that they may
float upon it, fear or dread defeat if they please. I would rather be
defeated in a good cause than to triumph in a bad one. I would not
give a fig for a man who would shrink from the discharge of duty for
fear of defeat. All is not gold that glitters, and there is no telling the
pure from the base until it is submitted to the fiery ordeal of the
crucible and the furnace. The best test of a man’s integrity and the
soundness of his principles is the furnace of popular opinion, and the
hotter the furnace the better the test. I have traveled from a distant
part of the State, where I first heard these floating taunts of fear—as
coming from this district—for the sole and express purpose of
announcing to you, one and all, and in this most public way to
announce to the other counties, without distinction of party, that I am
again a candidate for Congress in this district. The announcement I
now make. My name is hereby presented to the district; not by any
convention under a majority or a two-third rule—but by myself.
“I know, fellow-citizens, that many of you differ with me upon those
exciting questions which are now dividing—and most unhappily, too,
as I conceive—dividing our people. It is easy to join the shouts of the
multitude, but it is hard to say to a multitude that they are wrong. I
would be willing to go into one of your Know-Nothing lodges or
councils, where every man would be against me, if I could be
admitted without first having to put myself under obligations never to
tell what occurred therein, and there speak the same sentiments that
I shall utter here this night. Bear with me, then, while I proceed.[7] It
is to exhibit and hold up even to yourselves the great evils and
dangers to be apprehended from this ‘new,’ and, I think, most vicious
political ‘monster,’ that I would address you; and against the
influences of which I would warn and guard you, as well as the rest
of our people. While the specious outside title of the party is that
‘Americans shall rule America,’ when we come to look at its secret
objects as they leak out, we find that one of its main purposes is, not
that ‘Americans shall rule America,’ but that those of a particular
religious faith, though as good Americans as any others, shall be
ruled by the rest.
“But it is said the ‘proscription’ is not against a religious but a
political enemy, and the Roman Church is a political party,
dangerous and powerful. Was a bolder assertion, without one fact to
rest upon, ever attempted to be palmed off upon a confiding people?
The Roman Church a political party! Where are its candidates? How
many do they number in our State Legislatures or in Congress?
What dangers are they threatening, or what have they ever plotted?
Let them be named. Was it when Lord Baltimore, a Catholic,
established the colony of Maryland, and for the first time on this
continent established the principle of free toleration in religious
worship? Was it when Charles Carroll, a Catholic, signed the
Declaration of Independence? But it is said that great danger is to be
apprehended from the Catholics because of a ‘secret order’ amongst
them, known as Jesuits. ‘No one,’ says a Know-Nothing writer,
‘knows, or possibly can know, the extent of their influence in this
country. One of them may eat at your table, instruct your children,
and profess to be a good Protestant, and you never suspect him.
Their great aim is to make their mark in America. Perjury to them is
no sin, if the object of it be to spread Catholicism or acquire political
influence in the country.’ Whether this be true of the Jesuits or not I
cannot say. But I submit it to the consideration of candid minds how
far it is true of the new order of Know-Nothings, which is now so
strenuously endeavoring to make its mark in America, and to gain
political influence in the country, not only by putting down all
foreigners, and all native-born citizens who may be of Catholic faith,
but also all other native-born citizens who will not take upon their
necks the yoke of their power. Do not hundreds and thousands of
them go about daily and hourly, denying that they belong to the
order, or that they know anything about it? May they not, and do they
not ‘eat at your table,’ attend your sick, and some of them preach
from your pulpits, and yet deny that they know anything about that
‘order’ which they are making such efforts to spread in the land? I do
not say all of them do this; but is it not common with the ‘order,’ thus
by some sort of equivocation and slippery construction, to mislead
and deceive those with whom they converse? There is nothing
worse that can be said of any man or any people indicating a
destruction of morals or personal degradation, than that ‘the truth is
not in him.’ It is the life and soul of all the virtues, human or divine.
Tell me not that any party will effect reformation of any sort, bad as
we now are in this land, which brings into disrepute this principle
upon which rests all our hopes on earth, and all our hopes for
immortality. And my opinion is that the Protestant ministers of the
Gospel in this country, instead of joining in this New England,
puritanical, proscriptive crusade against Catholics, could not render
a better service to their churches, as well as the State, in the present
condition of morals amongst us, than to appoint a day for everyone
of them to preach to their respective congregations from this text,
‘What is truth?’ Let it also be a day set aside for fasting, humiliation
and prayer—for repentance in sackcloth and ashes—on account of
the alarming prevalence of the enormous sin of lying! Was there ever
such a state of general distrust between man and man before?
Could it ever have been said of a Georgia gentleman, until within a
few months past, that he says so and so, but I don’t know whether to
believe him or not? Is it not bringing Protestantism, and Christianity
itself, into disgrace when such remarks are daily made, and not
without just cause, about Church communicants of all our Protestant
denominations—and by one church member even about his fellow-
member? Where is this state of things to lead to, or end, but in
general deception, hypocrisy, knavery, and universal treachery?
“Was ever such tyranny heard of in any old party in this country as
that which this new ‘order’ sets up? Every one of them knows, and
whether they deny it or not, there is a secret monitor within that tells
them that they have pledged themselves never to vote for any
Roman Catholic to any office of profit or trust. They have thus
pledged themselves to set up a religious test in qualifications for
office against the express words of the Constitution of the United
States. Their very organization is not only anti-American, anti-
republican, but at war with the fundamental law of the Union, and,
therefore, revolutionary in its character, thus silently and secretly to
effect for all practical purposes a change in our form of government.
And what is this but revolution? Not an open and manly rebellion, but
a secret and covert attempt to undermine the very corner-stone of
the temple of our liberties.
“Whenever any government denies to any class of its citizens an
equal participation in the privileges, immunities, and honors enjoyed
by all others, it parts with all just claim to their allegiance. Allegiance
is due only so long as protection is extended; and protection
necessarily implies an equality of right to stand or fall, according to
merit, amongst all the members of society, or the citizens of the
commonwealth. The best of men, after all, have enough of the old
leaven of human nature left about them to fight when they feel
aggrieved, outraged and trampled upon; and strange to say, where
men get to fighting about religion they fight harder, and longer and
more exterminatingly than upon any other subject. The history of the
world teaches this. Already we see the spirit abroad which is to
enkindle the fires and set the fagots a blazing—not by the Catholics,
they are comparatively few and weak; their only safety is in the
shield of the constitutional guarantee; minorities seldom assail
majorities; and persecutions always begin with the larger numbers
against the smaller. But this spirit is evinced by one of the numerous
replies to my letter. The writer says: ‘We call upon the children of the
Puritans of the North, and the Huguenots of the South, by the
remembrance of the fires of Smithfield, and the bloody St.
Bartholomew, to lay down for once all sectional difficulties,’ etc., and
to join in this great American movement of proscribing Catholics.
What is this but the tocsin of intestine strife? Why call up the
remembrance of the fires of Smithfield but to whet the Protestant
appetite for vengeance? Why stir up the quiet ashes of bloody St.
Bartholomew, but for the hope, perhaps, of finding therein a
slumbering spark from which new fires may be started? Why
exhume the atrocities, cruelties, and barbarities of ages gone by
from the repose in which they have been buried for hundreds of
years, unless it be to reproduce the seed, and spread amongst us
the same moral infection and loathsome contagion?—just as it is
said the plague is sometimes occasioned in London by disentombing
and exposing to the atmosphere the latent virus of the fell disease
still lingering in the dusty bones of those who died of it centuries ago.
Fellow citizens, Fellow Protestants, Fellow Americans—all who
reverence the constitution of your country—I entreat you, and I
envoke you to give no listening ear to such fanatical appeals.
“When the principles of the Constitution are disregarded, when
those ‘checks and restraints,’ put in it as Mr. Madison has told us, for
‘a defence to the people against their own temporary errors and
delusions,’ are broken down and swept away, when the whole
country shall have been brought under the influence of the third
degree of this Know-Nothing order, if that time shall ever come, then,
indeed may the days of this Republic, too, be considered as
numbered.
“I wish to say something to you about this third degree, the union
degree, as it is called. For under this specious title, name or guise,
the arch-tempter again approaches us, quite as subtly as under the
other of ‘Americans shall rule America.’ The obligation taken in this
degree is ‘to uphold, maintain and defend’ the Union, without one
word being said about the Constitution. Now, as much as we all, I
trust, are devoted to the Union, who would have it without the
Constitution? This is the life and soul of it—this is its animating spirit.
It is this that gives it vitality, health, vigor, strength, growth,
development and power. Without it the Union could never have been
formed, and without it it cannot be maintained or held together.
Where the animating principle of any living organism is extinguished,
this is death, and dissolution is inevitable. You might just as well
expect that the component parts of your bodies could be held
together by some senseless incantations after the vital spark has
departed, as that this Union can be held together by any Know-
Nothing oaths when the Constitution is gone. Congress is to be done
away with, except in so far as its members may be necessary, as the
dumb instruments for registering the edicts of an invisible but all-
powerful oligarchy. Our present Government is to be paralyzed by
this boa-constrictor, which is now entwining its coils around it. It is to
be supplanted and displaced by another self-constituted and secretly
organized body to rise up in its stead, a political ‘monster,’ more
terrible to contemplate than the seven-headed beast spoken of in the
Apocalypse.
“I have seen it stated in the newspapers by some unknown writer,
that my letter to Col. Thomas will be my political winding-sheet. If
you and the other voters of the Eighth Congressional District so will
it, so let it be; there is but one other I should prefer—and that is the
Constitution of my country; let me be first wrapped in this, and then
covered over with that letter, and the principles I have announced
this night; and thus shrouded I shall be content to be laid away, when
the time comes, in my last resting-place without asking any other
epitaph but the simple inscription carved upon the headstone that
marks the spot—‘Here sleep the remains of one who dared to tell the
people they were wrong when he believed so, and who never
intentionally deceived a friend, or betrayed even an enemy.’”[8]
Thus spoke Alexander H. Stephens, Georgia’s greatest
statesman, of the pernicious tendencies of the Know-Nothing party.
On that speech he ran for Congress and was elected by three
thousand majority. Know-Nothingism was thus slain in Georgia.
Since the death of Mr. Stephens some scribbler with a talent for
forgery has taken the quotation marks from the paragraph about the
Jesuits in the foregoing speech, affixed Mr. Stephens’s name to it,
and sent it on its rounds through the press as the declared opinion of
the dead statesman concerning the followers of Loyola. Mr.
Stephens quoted the paragraph from a Know-Nothing writer, not to
approve the attack on the Jesuits, but for the opposite purpose of
showing it applied to the Know-Nothings themselves. No man in this
country could use the weapon of retort with more effect than
Alexander H. Stephens, and his remarks on the paragraph in
question afford a favorable instance of his power in that line. That
this stupid calumny on the great man who battled so nobly for the
equal rights of Catholics and Protestants, Jews and Gentiles, foreign
born and native Americans, should have been palmed off on the
public, is less surprising than that it should have found its way into
certain Catholic newspapers, in the columns of at least one of which
the present writer read it shortly after the death of Mr. Stephens.
The ever memorable conflict in Virginia of 1855, between the
Know-Nothings and Democrats, was led on the part of the latter by
the gallant Henry A. Wise. That conflict was one of great national
magnitude. If the Know-Nothings, theretofore victorious, had then
succeeded, it is likely a civil war precipitated by religious fanaticism
would have followed, not to be conducted between the States, as
later unfortunately occurred, but between citizens of the same cities,
and towns and neighborhoods throughout the Union, with a fury to
make humanity shudder—in every sense of the word a civil war. The
Virginia election of that year was, therefore, watched with intense
interest by the whole American people, and a feeling of feverish
excitement was everywhere visible. Henry A. Wise, the
uncompromising enemy of the Know-Nothings, was named as the
Democratic candidate for Governor of Virginia. Never was such a
canvass before. He went everywhere, pouring out fiery eloquence in
the Western Mountains, in the Blue Ridge that milks the clouds,
upon the Potomac, lovely River of Swans, on the Rappahannock, the
Piankatank, Mob Jack Bay, James River, Elizabeth River, down to
the North Carolina line; and wherever he went this second Patrick
Henry stirred the people’s hearts as they had not been stirred before.
One of the best stump speeches ever heard in this country was
made by Mr. Wise at Alexandria. He had declared hostility to the
Know-Nothings in a letter to a citizen of Virginia, written September
18, 1854.
In that letter he said: “I am a native Virginian; my ancestors on
both sides for two hundred years were citizens of this country and
this State—half English, half Scotch. I am a Protestant by birth, by
baptism, by intellectual belief, and by education and by adoption. I
am an American, in every fibre and in every feeling an American; yet
in every character, in every relation, in every sense, with all my head
and all my heart, and all my might, I protest against this secret
organization of native Americans and of Protestants to proscribe
Roman Catholic and naturalized citizens. As early as 1787 we
established a great land ordinance, the most perfect system of
eminent domain, of proprietary titles, and of territorial settlements,
which the world had ever beheld to bless the homeless children of
men. It had the very house-warming of hospitality in it. It wielded the
logwood axe, and cleared a continent of forests. It made an exodus
in the old world, and dotted the new with log-cabins, around the
hearths of which the tears of the aged and the oppressed were
wiped away, and cherub children were born to liberty, and sang its
songs, and have grown up in its strength and might and majesty. It
brought together foreigners of every country and clime—immigrants
from Europe of every language and religion, and its most wonderful
effect has been to assimilate all races. Irish and German, English
and French, Scotch and Spaniard, have met on the Western prairies,
in the Western woods, and have peopled villages and towns and
cities—queen cities, rivalling the marts of Eastern commerce; and
the Teutonic and Celtic and Anglo-Saxon races have in a day
mingled into one undistinguishable mass—and that one is American.
The children of all are crossed in blood in the first generation, so that
ethnology can’t tell of what parentage they are—they all become
brother and sister Jonathans. As in the colonies, as in the revolution,
as in the last war, so have foreigners and immigrants of every
religion and tongue contributed to build up the temple of American
law and liberty until its spire reaches to heaven, whilst its shadow
rests on earth. If there has been a turnpike road to be beaten out of
the rocky metal, or a canal to be dug, foreigners and immigrants
have been armed with the mattock and the spade and if a battle on
sea and land had to be fought, foreigners and immigrants have been
armed with the musket and the blade.
“We can name the very hour of our birth as a people. We need
recur to no fable of a wolf to whelp us into existence. As a nation we
are but seventy-eight years of age. Many persons are now living who
were alive before this nation was born. And the ancestors of this
people about two centuries only ago were foreigners, every one of
them coming to the shores of this country to take it away from the
aborigines, and to take possession of it by authority either directly or
derivatively of Papal Power. His Holiness the Pope was the great
grantor of all the new countries of North America. Foreigners in the
name of the Pope and Mother Church took possession of North
America, to have and to hold the same to their heirs against the
heathen forever. And now already their descendants are for
excluding foreigners, and the Pope’s followers from an equal
enjoyment of this same possession. So strange is human history.
Christopher Columbus! Ferdinand and Isabella! What would they
have thought of this had they foreseen it when they touched a
continent and called it theirs in the name of the Holy Trinity, by
authority of the keeper of the keys of Heaven, and of the great
grantor of the empire and domain of earth? What would have
become of our national titles to northeastern and northwestern
boundaries, but for the plea of this authority, valid of old among all
Christian powers?”
Writing thus in September, 1854, Mr. Wise, although he had been
a Whig years before, was nominated for Governor by the Democrats
in December of the same year. In his famous Alexandria speech,
before discussing Know-Nothingism, he told the people some
practical truths explanatory of the decadence of the prosperity of
Virginia, of the causes producing it, and the remedies to be applied.
“You have,” he said, “the bowels of your Western mountains rich in
iron, in copper, in coal, in salt, in gypsum, and the very earth is so
rich in oil that it sets the rivers in flame. You have the line of the
Alleghany, that beautiful Blue Ridge which stands placed there by
the Almighty, not to obstruct the way of the people to market, but
placed there in the very bounty of Providence to milk the clouds, to
make the sweet springs which are the sources of your rivers. And at
the head of every stream is the waterfall murmuring the very music
of your power to put spindles in motion. And yet commerce has long
ago spread her sails and sailed away from you; you have not as yet
dug more than coal enough to warm yourselves at your own hearths;
you have set no tilt-hammer of Vulcan to strike blows worthy of gods
in the iron foundries. You have not yet spun more than coarse cotton
enough, in the way of manufacture, to clothe your own slaves. You
have had no commerce, no mining, no manufactures. You have
relied alone on the single power of agriculture; and such agriculture!
Your sedge patches outshine the sun. Your inattention to your only
source of wealth has scarred the very bosom of mother earth.
Instead of having to feed cattle on a thousand hills, you have had to
chase the stump-tailed steer through the sedge patches to procure a
tough beef-steak. You are in the habit of discussing Federal politics;
and permit me to say to you, very honestly and very openly, that next
to brandy, next to card playing, next to horse-racing, the thing that
has done more harm to Virginia than any other in the course of her
past history, has been her insatiable appetite for Federal politics.
She has given all her great men to the Union. Her Washington, her
Jefferson, her Madison, her Marshall, her galaxy of great men she
has given to the Union. Richmond, instead of attending to
Richmond’s business, has been too much in the habit of attending to
the affairs of Washington city, when there are plenty there, God
knows, to attend to them themselves. * * “Puritanism,” said Mr. Wise,
has disappeared, and we have in place of it Unitarianism,
Universalism, Fourierism, Millerism, Mormonism—all the odds and
ends of isms—until at last you have a grand fusion of all those odds
and ends of isms in the omnium gatherum of isms called Know-
Nothingism. Having swept the North, the question was: How can this
ism be wedged in in the South? And the devil was at the elbow of
these preachers of ‘Christian politics’ to tell them precisely how.” [At
this point Mr. Wise was interrupted by cat-calls, derisive cheers and
other manifestations of the Know-Nothing element of the meeting.]
“There were three elements in the South,” continued the speaker,
“and in Virginia particularly, to which they might apply themselves.
There is the religious element, the 103,000 Presbyterians, the
300,000 Baptists, the 300,000 Methodists of Virginia. Well, how were
they to reach them? Why, just by raising a hell of a fuss about the
Pope!
“Cæsar’s kingdom is political, is a carnal kingdom. And I tell you
that if I stood alone in the State of Virginia, and if priestcraft—if the
priests of my own Mother Church dared to lay their hands on the
political power of our people, or to use their churches to wield
political influence, I would stand, in feeble imitation it may be, but I
would stand, even if I stood alone, as Patrick Henry stood in the
Revolution, between the parsons and the people. These men, many
of whom are neither Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Baptists,
Methodists, Congregationalists, Lutherans, nor what not—who are
men of no religion, who have no church, who do not say their
prayers, who do not read their Bible, who live God-defying lives
every day of their existence, are now seen with faces as long as their
dark-lanterns, with the whites of their eyes turned up in holy fear lest
the Bible should be shut up by the Pope! You tell the people that
Catholics never gave aid to civil liberty; that they never yet struck a
blow for the freedom of mankind. Who gave you alliance against the
crown of England? Who but that Catholic king, Louis XVI. He sent
you from the Court of Versailles Lafayette, the boy of Washington’s
camp, a foreigner who never was naturalized, but who bled at the
redoubt of Yorktown, when Arnold, a native, like Absalom proved
traitor.
“And, Sir, before George Washington was born, before Lafayette
wielded the sword, or Charles Carroll the pen for his country, six
hundred and forty years ago, on the 16th of June, 1214, there was
another scene enacted on the face of the globe, when the general
charter of all charters of freedom was gained, when one man, a man
called Stephen Langton, swore the Barons of England for the people
against the power of the King—swore the Barons on the high altar of
the Catholic Church at St. Edmundsbury, that they would have
Magna Charta or die for it. The charter which secures to every one of
you to-day trial by jury, freedom of the press, freedom of the pen, the
confronting of witnesses with the accused, and the opening of secret
dungeons—that charter was obtained by Stephen Langton against
the King of England, and if you Know-Nothings don’t know who
Stephen Langton was, you know nothing sure enough. He was a
Catholic Archbishop of Canterbury. I come here not to praise the
Catholics, but I come here to acknowledge historical truths, and to
ask of Protestants—what has heretofore been the pride and boast of
Protestants—tolerance of opinion in religious faith.
“All that I have to say to the Democracy is that you want active,
earnest organization. Remember that if these Know-Nothings hold
together they are sworn compact committees of vigilance. Go to
work then. Organize actively everywhere. Appoint your vigilance
committees, but take especial care that no Know-Nothings are
secretly and unknown to you upon them. Be prepared. I have gone
through most of Eastern Virginia, and in spite of their vaunting I defy
them to defeat me. There are Indians in the bushes, but I’ll whack on
the bayonet, and lunge at every shrub in the State till I drive them
out. I tell them distinctly there shall be no compromise, no parley. I
will come to no terms. They shall either crush me, or I will crush
them in this State.”
Mr. Wise, though his health was impaired, conducted his
campaign with extraordinary energy, travelling about 3000 miles, to
every point in the State, and speaking fifty times before the election.
He was triumphantly elected Governor of Virginia, receiving upwards
of ten thousand majority over his Know-Nothing competitor. The
impartial verdict of history is that Henry A. Wise did more to kill the
Know-Nothing party than any other man in the United States.
Many Know-Nothings were elected to Congress from the Northern
States, and a few from the Southern States. In the Senate and
House of Representatives there were seventy-eight members of that
party in 1855. Conspicuous among them all, on account of his
prejudices no less than his ability, was Henry Winter Davis, a
member of the Thirty-fourth and Thirty-fifth Congresses from
Baltimore.
The celebrated controversy upon the floor of Congress between
Davis and John Kelly on the Know-Nothing question entitles the
Know-Nothing leader to some notice here.
Henry Winter Davis was born at Annapolis, Maryland, August 16,
1817, and received his education at Kenyon College, Ohio, where he
was graduated in 1837. His father was an Episcopalian minister.
Young Davis was sent to the University of Virginia in 1839 by his
aunt, a Miss Winter of Alexandria, Virginia, and entered upon his
preparatory legal studies at that institution. He afterwards opened a
law office at Alexandria, where he struggled with poverty for some
years, making but little mark in that community, save as an
occasional contributor of political essays to the Alexandria Gazette,
but applying himself closely to his studies, and becoming an able
lawyer. Reverdy Johnson recognized his talents and advised him to
remove to Baltimore, where he would find a wider field for their
display. Mr. Davis acted on this advice, and made Baltimore his
home. He had married a Miss Cazenove of Alexandria, who soon
died, and subsequently he married a daughter of John S. Morris, a
wealthy and prominent citizen of Baltimore. Mr. Morris opposed the
marriage on account of Davis’s peculiar political views.
Henry Winter Davis was a man of genius, with a natural bent for
an opposition leader. In person he was handsome, in manners
haughty and reserved, in demeanor elegant; and he possessed the
gift of a fine oratory, both logical and persuasive. A morose temper
and a cynical and cold nature served to heighten the picturesque
effect of his character, and to make him delight in fomenting discord
and violence. “The ignorant Dutch and infuriated Irish, let them
beware lest they press the bosses of the buckler too far,” is said to
have been a form of expression he applied to Germans and Irishmen
in the course of one of his invectives on the stump in Baltimore. He
soon became an acknowledged leader of the Know-Nothings, and
no man knew better how to fire the rage and incite to acts of
bloodshed the Plug Uglies of that city. Had Davis lived during the era
of the Alien and Sedition Laws, his genius probably would have
placed him at the head of that conspiracy, and his name would have
become famous in history. He was a contemner of the sanctions of
authority. The sacredness of institutions handed down from
generation to generation unimpaired by the ravages of time,
awakened no sense of reverence in the mind of this iconoclast.
Burke’s beautiful allusion to the bulwarks of civil society which have
been stamped with the “mysterious virtue of wax and parchment,”
must have appeared to him only as a figure of rhetoric or a ridiculous
fetich. How contemptuously he regarded the warning of Washington
to his countrymen in the Farewell Address against entangling
alliances with the nations of Europe is discovered in the following
passage, found at page 367, of a book written by Mr. Davis, called
“The War of Ormuzd and Ahriman in the Nineteenth Century.”
“They who stand with their backs to the future and their faces to
the past, wise only after the event, and refusing to believe in dangers
they have not felt, clamorously invoke the name of Washington in
their protest against interference in the concerns of Europe. With
such it is useless to argue till they learn the meaning of the language
they repeat.”
With many similar sophistries he declared it would be wise policy
on the part of the United States to take part in European
controversies, and pretended to find warrant in the Monroe doctrine
for this radical reversal of Washington’s maxim. But that Davis was a
demagogue in the offensive sense of the word is evident from the
fact that the very advice of General Washington against foreign
influence, which he scouted at in his book, was soon after relied
upon by the same Davis as his chief argument in Congress for the
exclusion of foreigners from the rights and privileges of citizenship.
In the course of a Know-Nothing speech, delivered in the House of
Representatives, January 6th, 1857, he said: “Foreign allies have
decided the government of the country. * * * * Awake the national
spirit to the danger and degradation of having the balance of power
held by foreigners. Recall the warnings of Washington against

(Download PDF) Matrix Analysis of Structures 2nd Edition Kassimali Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

(Download PDF) Matrix Analysis of Structures 2nd Edition Kassimali Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Matrix Analysis of Structures 2nd

Edition Kassimali Solutions Manual

Structural Analysis 3rd Edition Kassimali Solutions

Structural Analysis 5th Edition Aslam Kassimali

Structural Analysis SI Edition 4th Edition Kassimali

Data Structures And Algorithm Analysis In C++ 4th

Starting Out With Java From Control Structures Through

Dynamics of Structures 4th Edition Chopra Solutions

Dynamics of Structures 5th Edition Chopra Solutions

Design of Concrete Structures 15th Edition Darwin

FAb = FAe = 0; FSb = FSe =

Member 1: L = 216 in.

Member 2: A = 108 in.2 , I = 1300 in.4 , L = 300 in.

Member 2: A = 9.12in .2 , I = 375in.4 , L = 300 in.

←  Fy = 0 − 17.636 + 17.636 = 0 checks

M = 0 − 58.196 − 118.17 + 17.636 (10 ) = −0.006 ≈ 0 checks

+   Fy = 0 86.728 − 15 (13 ) + 108.27 ≈ 0 checks

M (2) = 0 118.17 − 15 (13)( 6.5 ) − 258.2 + 108.27 (13) ≈ 0 checks

FAb = FAe = 0; FSb = 14 k; FSe = 6 k;

+ ↑  Fx = 0 128.12 − 128.12 = 0 checks

FAb = FAe = −14.423k; FSb = FSe = −34.615k

FM b = − FMe = −1350 k - in.

 M = 0 5179.3 − 69.231( 78 ) + 1942.5 − 11.038 (156 ) ≈ 0 checks

Member 2: cosθ = 1, sin θ = 0

Member 2: cosθ = 1, sin θ = 0

Member 2: cosθ = 0.8, sinθ = −0.6

Member 2: cosθ = −0.96, sinθ = 0.28

Member 2: cosθ = 1, sin θ = 0

Member 2: cosθ = 1, sin θ = 0

+ ↑  FY = 0 167.97 − 167.97 = 0 checks

 M = 0 − 58.196 − 118.17 + 17.636 (10 ) ≈ 0 checks

 M = 0 118.17 − 15 (13)( 6.5 ) − 258.2 + 252.64 ( 5 ) + 12.026 (12 ) ≈ 0 checks

+ ↑  FY = 0 128.12 − 75 − 53.119 ≈ 0 checks

 M = 0 5179.3 − 75 ( 72 ) + 1942.5 − 53.119 (144 ) + 98.786 ( 60 ) ≈ 0 checks

+ ↑  FY = 0 − 53.119 + 53.119 = 0 checks

 M = 0 − 2176.6 − 1942.5 + 51.214 (180 ) − 53.119 ( 96 ) ≈ 0 checks

Member 1: L = 240 in. , cosθ = 0 , sin θ = 1

Member 1: L = 10 m, cosθ = −0.6, sin θ = 0.8

94770 −123922 −7315.2 −94770 123922 −7315.2 

FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = FSe = −62.5 kN, FMb = − FM e = −156.25 kN ⋅ m

Member 2: L = 12 m , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0

FSb = FSe = 144 kN, FMb = − FM e = 288 kN ⋅ m

Member 1: L = 216 in.; cosθ = 1, sinθ = 0

315.57 − 234.05 188.89 − 315.57 234.05 188.89 

Member 1: L = 16 m ; cosθ = 0, sinθ = 1

694.92 0 − 5,559.4 − 694.92 0 − 5,559.4

117,980 − 34,357 − 637.59 − 117,980 34,357 − 637.59

Members 1 and 3: A = 80 in.2 , I = 550 in 4 , L = 240 in. , cosθ = 0 , sin θ = 1.

2.1484 0 −257.81 −2.1484 0 −257.81

Member 2: A = 108 in.2 , I = 1300 in.4 , L = 300 in. , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0

FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = FSe = 25 k, FM b = − FMe = 1250 k- in.

Member 1: A = 10.3in.2 , I = 285in.4 , L = 268.33in. , cosθ = 0.44721 ,

FAb = FAe = 10 k, FSb = FSe = 5 k

Member 2: A = 9.12 in 2 . , I = 375in.4 , L = 300 in. , cosθ = 1 , sin θ = 0

Member 1: L = 10 m , cosθ = 0 , sin θ = 1

From the solution of Problem 6.22, we obtain

Member 2: L = 13m , cosθ = 0.92308 , sin θ = 0.38462

FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = FSe = 97.5 kN

Member 1: L = 120 in., cos θ = 0, sin θ = 1

57.396 0 −3443.8 −57.396 0 −3443.8 

FAb = FAe = 0, FSb = 14 k, FSe = 6 k, FM b = 240 k- in., FMe = −160 k - in.

cosθ = −0.92308, sin θ = −0.38462

From the solution of Problem 6.23, we obtain