Instant Download PDF Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting Concepts and Practices 6th Edition Granof Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Government and Not-for-Profit
Accounting Concepts and Practices 6th

Edition Granof Solutions Manual
Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://testbankfan.com/product/government-and-not-for-profit-accounting-concepts-a
nd-practices-6th-edition-granof-solutions-manual/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting Concepts and

Practices 6th Edition Granof Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/government-and-not-for-profit-
accounting-concepts-and-practices-6th-edition-granof-test-bank/
Government And Not-For-Profit Accounting Concepts And

Practices 7th Edition Granof Solutions Manual
accounting-concepts-and-practices-7th-edition-granof-solutions-
manual/
Government And Not-For-Profit Accounting Concepts And

Practices 7th Edition Granof Test Bank
accounting-concepts-and-practices-7th-edition-granof-test-bank/
Core Concepts of Government and Not For Profit

Accounting 2nd Edition Granof Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/core-concepts-of-government-and-
not-for-profit-accounting-2nd-edition-granof-test-bank/
Introduction to Governmental and Not-for-Profit
Accounting 7th Edition Ives Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/introduction-to-governmental-and-
not-for-profit-accounting-7th-edition-ives-solutions-manual/
Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not-for-

Profit Organizations 12th Edition Copley Solutions
Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/essentials-of-accounting-for-
governmental-and-not-for-profit-organizations-12th-edition-
copley-solutions-manual/
Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not for

Manual
Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not-for-

Manual
Introduction to Governmental and Not-for-Profit

Accounting 7th Edition Ives Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/introduction-to-governmental-and-
not-for-profit-accounting-7th-edition-ives-test-bank/
Chapter 8
Long-Term Obligations
Questions for Review and Discussion
1. Unlike businesses, governments have the power to tax and, at least in theory, their
available resources are limited only by the wealth of their constituents. At the same
time, governments are charged with providing services, some of which, unlike those
provided by businesses, are essential to the public well-being and therefore cannot
be discontinued. Nevertheless, there are practical constraints on what they can
demand from their constituents and there may be considerable room for expenditure
cuts before the well being of the community is imperiled. The crucial issue,
therefore, involves balancing the needs and resources of the populace and the
demands of the creditors.
2. General long-term debt is the obligation of the government at-large and is thereby
backed by the government’s full faith and credit. Revenue debt, by contrast, is
secured only by designated revenue streams, such as from the sale of electricity,
highway tolls, rents, receipts from student loans or patient billings. Because revenue
debt is less secure than GO debt, it almost always commands higher interest rates.
Yet, if a single entity were to issue only general obligation debt its total interest
costs would likely be the same as if it were to issue a mix of both types.
3. The government would report the bonds at their face value plus or minus any
unamortized premiums or discounts. This amount differs from face value in that it
takes into account the unamortized premiums or discounts. It differs from market
value in that market value is equal to the present value of all required cash payments
discounted by a prevailing interest rate. Book value, however, is equal to the present
value of all required cash payments discounted by the interest rate that determined
the price of the bond when it was first issued (i.e., the yield rate).
4. The interest expenditure as reported in the debt service fund (a governmental fund)
would be equal to the required cash payment. That reported in the government-wide
statements would be equal to the required cash payment plus or minus the
amortization of the discounts or premiums — an amount also equal to the book
value of the debt times the initial yield rate.
5. Demand bonds are obligations that permit the holder (the lender) to demand
redemption within a specified period of time, usually one to 30 days, after giving
notice. The issuer can report them as long-term obligations if it has entered into a
qualifying take-out agreement (one that is non-cancellable, doesn’t expire for at
least a year, and is with an institution fiscally capable of honoring it).
6. The courts, not GAAP, determine the types of obligations subject to debt
limitations. In many jurisdictions the courts have focused on the non-appropriation
clauses included in capital leases, rather than on the economic substance of those
8-1
Granof and Khumawala 6e, Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting
leases. The non-appropriation clauses permit governments to cancel the leases if the
legislature fails in any year to appropriate the required funds for the lease payments.
Therefore, the courts have held that the leases do not obligate governments to the
same extent as do conventional debt instruments.
7. Tax Anticipation Notes (TANs) and Revenue Anticipation Notes (RANs) or a

combination of both known as TRANs— are short-term notes payable out of
specified streams of revenues. Governments issue these notes to meet cash and
other expenditure needs earlier in the fiscal year. They will not be converted into
long-term instruments and therefore, must be accounted for in the funds in which
the related revenues will be reported; they cannot be relegated to off-the-balance-
sheet status. Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs) are short-term notes issued by the
lender with the expectation that they will soon be replaced by long-term bonds.
Governments can issue BANs only after obtaining the necessary voter approval and
legislative authorization to issue long-term bonds. If a government as planned,
refunds the BANs with long-term bonds, then the notes are, in essence, long-term
obligations and generally accepted accounting principles provide that a government
may recognize BANs as long-term obligations if, by the date the financial
statements are issued, ‘‘all legal steps have been taken to refinance the BANs and
the intent is supported by an ability to consummate refinancing of the short-term
note on a long-term basis.
8. Overlapping debt refers to the obligations of property owners within a particular

government for the proportionate share of debts of other governments with
overlapping geographic boundaries. It represents obligations that are supported from
the same sources as the government’s direct debt. Overlapping debt is significant
because, like direct debt, it bears upon the government’s fiscal capacity to meet its
obligations as they come due.
9. Conduit debt represents bonds or similar instruments issued by a government on

behalf of a nongovernmental entity, such as a business or not-for-profit
organization. Governments are not required to report conduit debt on their balance
sheets because the debt is expected to be serviced entirely by the entity benefiting
from the debt, not the government itself. In economic substance, therefore, the
government permits a nongovernmental entity to use its status as a tax-exempt entity
to get the benefits of lower interest rates.
10. Moral obligation debt constitutes bonds or notes issued by one entity (usually a
state agency) but backed by a pledge of another entity (usually the state itself) to
seek appropriations to cover any debt service deficiencies. The debt proceeds are
typically used to construct projects or carry out activities that would otherwise be
undertaken by the state. The debt is referred to as “moral” obligation debt because
the promise is not legally enforceable. Moral obligation debt provides a means by
which a state can circumvent debt limitations. The state can reap the benefits of the
debt without having to actually issue it in its own name.
8-2
11. Bond ratings directly affect an issuer’s interest costs. The lower the rating the
higher the interest costs.
Exercises
EX 8-1
1. b
2. c
3. d
4. a
5. a
6. c
7. a
8. b
9. a
10. d
EX 8-2
1. c
2. b
3. d
4. c
5. b
6. a
7. d
8. c
9. a
10. c
EX 8-3
1. d $800,000
2. e $817,419
3. b $0
4. k $10,000,000
5. b $0
6. o $38,942,147
7. g $1,350,000
8-3
8. a $(34,942,147)
9. j $2,025,000
EX 8-4
1. Government-wide statements
Cash $ 89,322
Bond discount 10,678
Bonds payable $100,000
To record the issuance of bonds
Bond Interest expense $ 3,126

Cash $ 3,000
Bond discount 126
To record first period interest expense (3.5 percent of $89,322)

Cash $ 3,000
Bond discount 131
To record second period interest expense (3.5 percent of $89,448 — the initial issue price
of $89,322 plus the $126 of first period bond discount amortization)
2. Governmental fund statements
Cash $ 89,322
Other financing sources—bond proceeds $ 89,322
To record issuance of bonds
Bond Interest expenditure $ 3,000

Cash $ 3,000
To record first period interest expenditure
Bond Interest expenditure $ 3,000

Cash $ 3,000
To record second period interest expenditure
8-4
EX 8-5
1. To record issuance
Cash $200M
Other financing sources—proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt $200M
To record issuance of BANs
2. No entry would be necessary in a governmental fund to record the conversion of the

BANs to actual bonds
3. To adjust accounts assuming state was unable to convert
Other financing sources—proceeds

from issuance of long-term debt $200M
BANs payable $200M
To record the BANs as a current fund liability.
4. In the government-wide statements the BANs would be reported as a liability

irrespective of whether the state was able to convert. If the state were able to
convert, the bonds would be shown along with other long-term liabilities; if not, it
would be shown along with other short-term liabilities.
EX 8-6
General Fund Government-wide Statements
(in millions) (in millions)
1. Expenditure $ 6.6 Expense $ 7.7

Increase in debt 0.0 Increase in debt 1.1

Change in debt 0.0 Decrease in debt 0.5

Change in debt 0.0 Increase in debt 10.0

Change in debt 0.0 Increase in debt 100.0

Change in debt 0.0 Decrease in debt 1.0
8-5
EX 8-7
1. Upon inception of lease
Equipment held under lease $800,000

Capital lease obligations $800,000
To record the signing of the lease
2. First payment of interest
Capital lease obligations (lease principal) $ 60,694

Interest expense (lease interest) 48,000
Cash $108,694
To record the first lease payment (interest equals 6 percent of $800,000)
Depreciation expense $ 80,000

Accumulated depreciation—equipment
held under lease $ 80,000
To record first year’s depreciation ($800,000 divided by 10 years)
3. Each year the allocation of the payment will change. As the balance in the lease
liability is decreased, the proportion allocated to interest will decrease and that
allocated to principal will increase.
4. The lease would be recorded in the appropriate fund with a debit to “expenditures for
the acquisition of an asset” and a credit to “other financing sources – capital lease”
No liability or asset would be recognized. Each lease payment would be reported

entirely as expenditure. No depreciation would be charged.
EX 8-8
1.
Cash $36,321,000
Bond discount 3,679,000
Bonds payable $40,000,000
To record the issuance of bonds (in an unrestricted fund)
8-6
2.
Bond Interest expense $1,271,000

Bond discount amortized $ 071,000
Cash 1,200,000
To record the first semi-annual payment of bond interest (Cash payment is equal to 3
percent of bonds’ $40 million face value; interest expense is equal to 3.5 percent of
effective liability of $36,321,000 (in an unrestricted fund))
3.
Bond Interest expense $1,274,000

Bond discount amortized $ 074,000
Cash 1,200,000
To record the second semi-annual payment of bond interest (Cash payment is equal to 3
percent of bonds’ $40 million face value; interest expense is equal to 3.5 percent of new
effective liability of $39,322,000 — the previous effective liability of $36,321,000 plus the
$71,000 reduction in the discount) (in an unrestricted fund)
Continuing Problem
The solution to the continuing problem is based on the CAFR for the City of Austin,
Texas, for the year-ended September 30, 2011.
The 2011 CAFR can be found at:

https://assets.austintexas.gov/financeonline/downloads/cafr/cafr2011.pdf
City of Austin FY 2011
1. Per Note 6 (a), the schedule of long-term obligations, the city’s total long term
obligations of governmental activities in 2011 is $1,464.88 million and the total long
term obligations of business-type activities in 2011 is $5,402.194 million. The total
amount of debt is $6,867.074 million (p. 64). Per the government-wide statement of
net assets (net position) long term debt is $6,693.750 million (p.17). The CAFR does
not reconcile the two amounts. However, the difference represents the current portion
of long-term liabilities that is included in the balance sheet.
2. Other kinds of long-term debt the city reported in its statement of net position for
governmental activities are accrued compensated absences; claims payable; capital
appreciation bond interest payable; commercial paper notes payable, net of discount;
revenue notes payable; bonds payable, net of discount and inclusive of premium;
pension obligation payable; other post-employment benefits payable; capital lease
obligations payable; accrued landfill closure and postclosure costs; decommissioning
liability payable from restricted assets; derivative instruments-energy risk
8-7
management; derivative instruments-interest rate swaps; deferred credits and other

liabilities; and other liabilities payable from restricted assets.
3. The summary of changes in long-term obligations (p. 64) indicates an increase in

long-term borrowings during the year. The effect on total long-term liabilities at year
end is an overall increase in long-term liabilities in comparison to the beginning of
the year (p. 64).
4. As indicated in the statistical section, Table 14, the percentage of total net bonded
debt to assessed value of property (percentage of actual taxable value of property) is
1.35%, with a net general bonded debt per capita of $1,302,970 (p. 208).
5. As indicated in the statistical section - Table 16, Austin has a legal debt margin of
$10,296,099. (p. 210)
6. As indicated in the schedule of long-term liabilities the city has capital lease
obligations outstanding of $43 million in business-type activities. No capital leases
were initiated in governmental activities or business-type activities during the fiscal
year (p. 64).
7. Per the Statistical section schedule, “Direct and overlapping Governmental activities
Debt,” the total direct debt is $938,128, and the total overlapping debt is $5,242,378
(p. 209).
8. Per note 15 (p. 100), the city has a substantial amount of conduit bonds outstanding.
These bonds are secured by the property financed and are payable solely from
payments received on the underlying mortgage loans. Their aggregate principal
amounts could not be determined; however their original issue amounts totaled
$310.2 million. Since 1997, the City has issued $83.8 million in various series of
housing revenue bonds that has an outstanding balance of $75.8 million as of
September 30, 2011.
Problems
P. 8-1
a. General or other governmental fund
(1)
No entry necessary
8-8
(2)
No entry necessary
(3)
Cash $8,000,000
Other financing sources—bond proceeds $8,000,000
To record issuance of bonds (in a capital projects fund)
Construction expenditures $1,000,000

Cash $1,000,000
To record construction costs (in a capital projects fund)
(4)
No entry is necessary to record the signing of the lease.
Rent expenditure $ 40,000

Cash $ 40,000
To record payment of rent
(5)
Fixed assets—expenditure $ 869,371

Other financing sources—capital lease $ 869,371
To record the acquisition of equipment under a capital lease
Debt service expenditure (lease principal) $ 87,838

Debt service expenditure (lease interest) 52,162
Cash $ 140,000
(6)
Nonreciprocal transfer-out $ 500,000

Cash $ 500,000
To record transfer from the general fund (to a debt service fund)
Cash $ 500,000
Nonreciprocal transfer-in $ 500,000
To record transfer to a debt service fund (from the general fund)
8-9
(7)
Cash $ 950,000
Tax anticipation notes payable $950,000
To record issuance of tax anticipation notes payable
(8)
Compensation expenditure $ 150,000

Cash $150,000
To record payment to teachers for compensated absences
b. Government-wide statements
(1)
Compensation expense $ 350,000

Liability for compensated absences $350,000
To record expenditure and liability for compensated absences
(2)
Claims and judgments—expense $3,000,000

Claims and judgments payable $3,000,000
(3)
Cash $8,000,000
Construction in process $1,000,000

Cash $1,000,000
To record construction costs
(4)
Since this is an operating lease, no entry is necessary to record the signing of the lease.
Rent expense $ 40,000

Cash $ 40,000
To record payment of rent
(5)
Vehicles held under lease $ 869,371

Capital lease obligations $ 869,371
To record the acquisition of vehicles under a capital lease
8-10
Capital lease obligations (lease principal) $ 87,838

Cash $140,000
Amortization of leasehold $108,671

Vehicles held under lease $108,671
To record amortization of the lease for one year
(6)
No entry is necessary to reflect an internal transfer in governmental funds.
(7)
Cash $ 950,000
Tax anticipation notes payable $950,000
To record issuance of tax anticipation notes payable
(8)
Liability for compensated absences $ 150,000

Cash $150,000
To record payment to teachers for compensated absences
P. 8-2
1. Issuance of the bonds
Cash $6,627,909
Bond premium 627,909
To record the issuance of bonds (unrestricted resources)
The net liability (bonds payable plus premium) reflects the amount actually borrowed.
8-11
2. First payment of interest

Bond premium amortized 14,302
Cash $ 180,000
To record the first payment of interest (unrestricted resources)
Immediately following the first payment the effective liability would be reduced by the
amount of the premium amortized ($14,302) and would thereby be equal to $6,613,607.
The reported bond interest expense is equal to 2.5 percent (the yield rate) of $6,627,909
(the effective liability) — i.e., the effective interest rate times the effective liability. The
amount paid, by contrast, is equal to the 3 percent (the coupon rate) times $6,000,000 (the
face value of the debt).
3. Market value of bonds
Present value of 29 coupon payments (an annuity of

$180,000, discounted at 2 percent) $180,000 x $21.84438
(the present value of an annuity of $1) $3,931,989
Present value of principal payment (a single

sum of $6,000,000 discounted at 2 percent)
$6,000,000 x $0.56311 (the present value of $1) 3,378,674
Total $7,310,663
This amount would not appear on the statements of the district (either fund or
government-wide). It would be of interest to statement users because it indicates the
amount for which the bonds could be redeemed — the effective amount of the liability as
of the statement date. Further, when compared with the original issue price (or the market
value of a previous period), it shows whether, and the extent to which, the entity
benefited or was harmed by the change in interest rates. In this illustration, the district
would have been better-off either waiting to issue the debt or issuing the debt for only six
months. It would thereby have avoided locking itself into a rate of 5 percent, when it
could have waited and borrowed at a rate of 4 percent.
4. In its fund statements the district would not report the bond liability. It would report
the bond proceeds as an “other financing source.” It would report each period’s
interest expenditure as the amount actually due — i.e., an amount based on the
coupon rate. It would not take into account bond discounts or premiums.
8-12
P. 8-3
1. a. Assuming a take-out agreement (thereby qualifying the bonds as long-term
debt).
Cash $2,000,000
Other financing sources—bond proceeds $2,000,000
To record the bond proceeds (general fund or capital projects fund)
b. Assuming no take-out agreement (thereby requiring the bonds to be accounted

for as short-term, fund, liabilities).
Cash $2,000,000
To record the bond proceeds (general fund or capital projects fund)
2. Neither the specific bondholder needing cash nor other bondholders would redeem
their bonds. If they did not need immediate cash, they would have no incentive to
redeem the bonds since alternative investments of the same risk would be paying the
prevailing interest rate of 4 percent rather than the 7 percent they are now receiving.
If they did need immediate cash they would be better off selling the bonds in the
open market, inasmuch as the market price of the bonds would be considerably
higher than their par (redemption) value.
3. If interest rates had risen to 9 percent then all bondholders would be better off
redeeming their bonds. Those not needing the cash could invest their funds in other
bonds of comparable risk and thereby trade a 7 percent return for a 9 percent return.
4. If prevailing rates were 9 percent then the most likely rate charged by the financing
institution would be the same 9 percent.
5. The demand bonds provide the city with none of the benefits of a guaranteed long-
term interest rate. If interest rates were to rise, the city would have to redeem the
bonds and refinance the debt at the higher, prevailing rate. By contrast, the demand
bonds burden the city with the corresponding disadvantages of fixed long-term
interest rates. If interest rates were to fall, the city could not “call” the bonds at par
and refinance them at a lower interest rate. They are thereby locked into the fixed
rate when interest rates fall, but not when they rise. (On the other hand, because of
these disadvantages, the demand bonds probably would carry a much lower interest
rate than long-term bonds.)
8-13
P. 8-4
1. Inasmuch as the city actually refinanced the BANs, it should account for them as
long-term debt. Thus, the entry to record the debt in a governmental fund (e.g., a
capital projects fund) would be:
Cash $4.0
Other financing sources—proceeds from issuance of BANs $4.0
To record the issuance of BANs
2. If it did not actually refinance the BANs then it would have to demonstrate that it
entered into a financing agreement:
• that does not expire within one year of the balance sheet date and is non-
cancellable by the lender
• that has not been violated as of the balance sheet date and
• is capable of being honored by the lender.
If it is unable to do so it should report the debt as a current liability in a

governmental fund. Thus:
Cash $4.0
Bond anticipation notes payable $4.0
To record the issuance of BANs
3. TANs should always be reported as a current liability of a governmental fund,

irrespective of whether they have been rolled-over.
4. RANs should also be reported as a current liability of a governmental fund.
P. 8-5
1. These are conduit bonds. They should not be reported in the basic financial
statements. Note disclosure is sufficient.
2. Bond anticipation notes should be reported as current liabilities of both a

governmental fund (presumably a debt service fund) and government-wide statements
unless the city has already refinanced the notes or has entered into a financing
agreement to do so (something for which there is no evidence in this problem that the
city has done).
3. Inasmuch as the city has no obligation to repay the debt — and indeed is prohibited
from assuming the debt — it should not report it in its basic financial statements.
8-14
4. These are demand (put) bonds. Unless the city has entered into a take-out agreement
to refinance the bonds in the event that they have to be refunded and the agreement
satisfies certain criteria the — for which there is not evidence in this problem — it
should report the bonds as current obligations both in an appropriate fund and in
government-wide statements.
5. The debt of the school district is overlapping debt from the perspective of the city.
Overlapping debt should be reported as supplementary information in the statistical
section of its annual report.
P. 8-6
1. Acquisition of asset by lease (government-wide statements)
Building held under lease $5,000,000

Capital lease obligations $5,000,000
To record the acquisition of the building by lease
2. First lease payment and depreciation
Capital lease obligations (lease principal) $135,923

Cash $435,923
To record the first lease payment consisting of interest (6 percent of $5,000,000) and
principal
Depreciation (or amortization) expense $250,000

Accumulated depreciation—building held under lease $250,000
To record first year’s depreciation ($5 million divided by 20 years)
The second lease payment would differ from the first in that the interest would be based
on an obligation of $4,864,077 (the original obligation less the first payment of
principal). Correspondingly, the principal payment would increase by the same amount.
3. Key arguments that the lease constitutes long-term debt
1. The lease must be accounted for as debt under generally accepted accounting
principles. Hence, the accounting rule-making authorities, who are the experts
in such matters, consider it debt.
2. The transaction is clearly a ruse to avoid debt limitations. The lease agreement
slightly alters the form of what would otherwise be a conventional
purchase\borrow arrangement, but not the economic substance.
3. Despite the non-appropriation clause, the city cannot disavow its lease
obligations without seriously impairing its credit standing. Indeed, it pledged
to make a good faith effort to make the payments required of it.
8-15
4. In economic substance the city has assumed all risks and rewards of
ownership.
4. Key arguments that the lease does not constitute long-term debt
1. Accounting rules should not govern legal status, no more than legal status
should govern accounting rules; the two have different purposes.
2. The non-appropriation clause specifically states that the lease does not create a
binding obligation. The council must appropriate funds for each payment.
3. The mere probability that a government will make payments in the future does
not constitute a liability.
4. The definition of debt for purposes of debt limitations is elusive. After all,
even non-cancellable obligations, such as those arising from bonds (e.g., the
obligation for interest) and from service contracts (the obligation to continue to
take and pay for services) have not been considered debt for purposes of either
external financial reporting or debt limitations.
P. 8-7
1. The percentages of the debt applicable to the city were most likely derived by
dividing the assessed value of the property located within the city by the assessed
value of the property located within the other governments.
2. Direct and overlapping debt
Percentage
Net Debt Applicable City’s
Name of Government Unit Outstanding to City Share
City of Wyoming $ 22,863,510 100.00% $ 22,863,510
Kent County 125,653,951 13.40 16,837,629

Kent County Intermediate
School District 1,766,795 13.55 239,401
Wyoming Public Schools 3,956,922 99.24 3,926,849
Godwin Heights Public Schools 1,338,501 85.96 1,150,576
Kelloggsville Public Schools 2,363,037 61.97 1,464,374
Grandville Public Schools 10,734,809 13.58 1,457,787
Kentwood Public Schools 25,502,958 .55 140,266
Godfrey Lee Public Schools 3,204,362 100.00 3,204,362
Total direct and overlapping debt $ 51,284,754
8-16
3. Adjusted measures
Ratio of total net direct debt and overlapping debt to assessed value of property:
$51,284,754/$1,228,774,900 = 4.17%
Total net direct and overlapping debt per capita:
$51,284,754/64,500 = $795
4. The adjusted measures that include all debt (revenue bonds and overlapping debt)
are more than twice those that include only direct GO debt. The adjusted measures
may be of concern to statement users because they indicate the amount of debt that
must be paid by the population of the city. In assessing the debt-paying capacity of a
potential borrower, bankers would never consider merely the debt that a husband or
wife had outstanding. They would take into account the debt owed by the other
spouse for which he or she was jointly responsible. So too should the analyst take
into account the debt that city property-owners and residents owe because they are
part of other governments.
P. 8-8
1. The only amount that would be reflected on the district’s balance sheet is the present
value of the minimum lease payments — $1,818. The obligations for operating lease
payments would not be reported.
2. The amount representing interest is the difference between the total lease payments
and the present value of those payments. In other words, the present value of the
minimum lease payments is equal to the principal balance of the amount
“borrowed” by the district. The total minimum lease payments represent the
combined principal and interest payments (not taking into account the time value of
money).
3. Interest expense for 2014 would be 6.56 percent of the $1,818 lease liability. Thus:
Interest expense $119

Capital lease liability 637
Cash $756
To record the first lease payment
4. The operating lease payment would be recorded as an ordinary rent expense:
Rent expense $11,696

Cash $11,696
To record the first lease payment
8-17
5. Discounting each of the payments from 2014 through 2022 at a rate of 6.56 percent
(using a spreadsheet function) yields an obligation of $43,643. Although this
obligation does not qualify as a capital lease liability — and is therefore not reported
as a long-term liability — it is just as significant to a statement user as the debt
which is reported. The note indicates that the operating leases are not cancelable.
Therefore, they are as much of a commitment of resources as the reported liabilities.
P. 8-9
1. Compensated absences - general fund
Compensated absences - expenditures $ 29,700

Cash $ 29,700
To record the payments to employees for compensated absences earned by employees in
previous years (In the general fund the only amount that would be recognized would be
the actual payments to employees)
2. Compensated absences - government-wide statements
Compensated absences - expense $ 32,800

To record the amount earned by employees

Cash $ 29,700
To record the amount paid to employees for compensated absences earned in previous
years.
3. Issuance and retirement of debt - capital projects and debt service funds
Cash $ 121
Other finance sources - bond proceeds $ 121
To record the issuance of GO debt (capital projects fund)
Expenditure - payment of debt service principal $ 30,179

Cash $ 30,179
To record the repayment of GO debt (debt service fund)
4. Issuance and retirement of debt - government-wide statements
Cash $ 121
Bonds payable $ 121
To record the issuance of GO debt (capital projects fund)
8-18
Bonds payable $ 30,179

Cash $ 30,179
To record the repayment of GO debt (debt service funds)
5. The $47,000 addition represents the amount of pensions earned by employees but
not paid (i.e., contributed to the pension fund). The $53,500 reduction represents
pensions paid (i.e., distributed to retirees) during the current year but earned in prior
years and the current year.
6. The office lease is undoubtedly an operating lease. Hence, the lease payments would
not be capitalized. They would not be reported as a liability on either fund or
government-wide statements; they would not be shown on the schedule of changes
in long-term liabilities.
8-19
P. 8-10
1. Revised Legal Debt Margin for General Obligation Bonds
June 30
Value of assessed property (excluding certain

industrial and commercial properties) (note 1) $1,082,292,630
Debt limit — ten percent of assessed value 108,229,263
Amount of debt applicable to debt limit:

Total bonded debt (note 2) $63,442,000
Less:
Assets available for debt service (note 3) 1,970,453
Revenue bonds not subject to debt limitations (note 4) 8,025,000
9,995,453
Total amount of debt applicable to debt limitations 53,446,547
Legal debt margin $ 54,782,716
Note 1. 95 percent of $1,139,255,400

Note 2. $27,442,000 plus $36,000,000
Note 3. $1,770,453 plus $200,000
Note 4. $2,025,000 plus $6,000,000
2. Inasmuch as the lease satisfies the criteria of a capital lease, it would be reported as
a government-wide liability in the amount of $199,634 (the present value of 5
annual payments of $50,000 discounted at 8 percent). The service contract, by
contrast, would be recognized as a liability only as the services are actually
performed. Hence it would not be reported as a liability when the contract was
signed.
As widely recognized in accounting, capital leases are, in economic substance,

purchase/borrow transactions. Therefore, it has been argued (and many jurisdictions
have accepted the position) that the obligations under capital leases should be
subject to debt limitations just as if they were conventional borrowing arrangements.
On the other hand, it has been asserted that if a lease contains a non-appropriation
clause, the lessee is not legally bound to make the specified lease payments, and
therefore it should not be counted as debt.
Service contracts, while not recognized as long-term debts by accountants,

nevertheless obligate the government to make future payments. Therefore, if the
purpose of debt limitations is to protect governments from excessive commitments,
it can be argued they, like accounting liabilities, should be subject to the restrictions.
(Of course similar arguments can be made with respect to obligations for unaccrued
interest, salaries under employment contracts, and unaccrued rent. No jurisdictions
count those obligations as debts subject to limitation)
8-20
3. Revenue bonds, unlike GO bonds, are not backed by the full faith and credit of the
issuer. They are backed only by specified revenue streams. Therefore, the
government has no enforceable obligation to pay the bonds, except from the
dedicated revenues.
Nevertheless, it can be argued that, in reality, the government cannot default on the
bonds without doing irreparable damage to its own credit standing. Therefore, debt
service on revenue bonds can put as much of a fiscal strain on the government as
can its GO bonds.
P. 8-11
1. According to Moody’s, debt rated “Aa” (or the equivalent of Standard & Poors AA)
“are judged to be of high quality by all standards.”
2. The most likely explanation for the higher rating is that the city carries bond
insurance with a reputable municipal bond insurance company. Bond insurance, in
effect, permits the city to substitute the credit rating of the insurance company for its
own. The leading bond rating services almost always rate insured bonds as AAA.
3. The difference between total GO debt service requirements and total reported GO
debt is interest. Both governments and businesses accrue interest as a liability over
time, as the borrower has use of the fund received. Nevertheless, the interest is just
as much an obligation as the principal.
4. The most likely reason that the city does not refund the bonds (a reason confirmed
by information in a schedule of bonds outstanding) is that the bonds are not callable.
That is, the city cannot demand that holders redeem their bonds. Of course, the city
could buy-back the bonds at market price. But since the prevailing rates of interest
are lower than the coupon rates on the bonds, the bonds will command a sizable
premium. Indeed, the premium will be sufficiently high to equate the effective
economic cost of holding the existing bonds with that of replacing them with new
bonds.
5. Assessed value of property $1,818,909,000

Allowable percentage .06
Allowable debt 109,134,540
Applicable debt outstanding 70,998,000
Legal debt margin $ 38,136,540
8-21
6. The burden of debt can be measured by the ratio of net GO debt to assessed value of
property.
2008 2015
Assessed value of property $1,555,216,000 $1,818,909,000
Gross GO bonded debt 110,910,000 209,000,000
Less: amount in debt service funds 0 4,012,000
Net GO bonded debt 110,910,000 204,988,000
Ratio of net GO debt to
assessed value of property 0.071 0.113
The ratio is greater in 2015 than in 2008. Other factors held constant the burden of
debt is greater in 2015 than in 2008.
P. 8-12
1. Individual Funds
Capital Projects Fund
Cash $1,016,510
Other Financing Source-Bond proceeds 1,016,510
To record the proceeds from Bond issuance
Other financing use — nonreciprocal transfer-out

of bond premium to debt service fund $ 16,510
Cash $ 16,510
To record the transfer of the premium to the debt service fund
Expenditures — construction of sidewalks $1,000,000

Cash $1,000,000
To record the expenditure for construction of the sidewalks
Debt Service Fund
Cash $ 16,510
Other financing source — nonreciprocal transfer-
in of bond premium from capital projects fund $ 16,510
To record the transfer of the premium from the capital projects fund
Assessments receivable $1,000,000

Deferred revenue -- assessments $1,000,000
To record the assessments
8-22
Cash $ 123,290
Assessments receivable $ 83,290
Interest revenue 40,000
To record the first collection of on the assessments. Interest is equal to 4 percent of the
beginning balance of $1,000,000.
Deferred revenue -- assessments $ 83,290

Revenue — assessments $ 83,290
To recognize revenue from the assessments collected
Expenditure —Bond interest $ 20,000

Cash $ 20,000
To record payment of bond interest
Investments $ 119,800
Cash $ 119,800
To record the investment of available cash
Cash $ 3,000
Interest revenue $ 3,000
To record interest on the investments
2. Government-wide Statements
Cash $1,016,510
Bond premium 16,510
Assessments receivable $1,000,000

Deferred revenue -- assessments $1,000,000
To record the assessments
Infrastructure assets — sidewalks $1,000,000

Cash $1,000,000
To record the construction of the sidewalks
Cash $ 123,290
Assessments receivable $ 83,290
Interest revenue 40,000
To record the first collection of the assessments. Interest is equal to 4 percent of the
beginning balance of $1,000,000.
Deferred revenue -- assessments $ 83,290

Revenue — assessments $ 83,290
To recognize revenue from the assessments collected
8-23

Bond premium amortized 686
Cash $ 20,000
To record payment of bond interest, the recognition of interest expense (1.9 percent of
$1,016,510 — the gross value of the bond liability — and the amortization of the bond
premium))
Investments $ 119,800
Cash $119,800
To record the investment of available cash
Cash $ 3,000
Interest revenue $ 3,000
To record interest on the investments
Depreciation expense $ 100,000

Accumulated depreciation — infrastructure
assets — sidewalks $ 100,000
Questions for Research, Analysis and Discussion
1. Currently we do not mark debt to market. Arguably we should. Suppose that a

government issues debt to fund a pension plan. The plan then invests in government
or corporate bonds with the same maturities as the bonds it issued. If interest rates
fall, the value of the investments will increase and the pension plan will report them
at market value and will recognize a gain. Correspondingly, however, the market
value of the debt will also increase. They government would not be permitted to
recognize a loss. This is clearly an inconsistency.
As discussed in Chapter 6 pertaining to debt refundings, governments incur an

economic loss when they lock themselves into a high interest rate and rates
subsequently fall. Many observers believe that such loss should be given accounting
and reporting recognition.
2. A reasonable case could be made that general obligation debt should be reported as
government-wide debt inasmuch it is a full-faith and credit obligation of the
government at-large. Nevertheless, the GASB, looking ironically to the NCGA for
guidance (NCGA Statement No. 1, para. 42), suggests that the debt should be
associated with the golf course, which is accounted for in an enterprise fund.
Comprehensive Implementation Guide, Question 7.126, states that “bonds, notes, and
other long-term liabilities directly related to and expected to be paid from proprietary
funds should be included in the accounts of such funds.” It emphasizes, however,
that if the debt were not expected to be paid with resources of the enterprise fund —
i.e., with resources of a governmental fund — then the debt should be reported as a
governmental activity.
8-24
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Rennes, 97.
Reymonenq, 55.
Richard (le roi), 136, 160.
Richard de Noves, 125.
Rieu, 87.
Riffart, 93.
Rigaut de Montpellier, 61, 193.
An. Rivière, 63.
Rixende de Puyvard (dame de Trans), 156.
Roch-Bourguet, 61.
Rocher (de), 93.
Rodel (Jean), 136.
Rodolphe (le roi), 124.
Rogier (Pierre), 184.
Rome, 168.
Roqueferrier, 194.
Roquefeuille (Ysarde de), 156.
Rostangue (dame de Pierrefeu), 156.
Roumanille, 55, 59, 61, 72.
Roumieux, 62, 63, 91.
Rousselot (l’abbé), 97.
Roux (J.), 91, 183.
Roux-Renard, 93.
Roux-Servine, 93.
Saboly, 178.
Sabran (Hugonne de), 156.
Saint-Antoni (Vte de), 186.
Saint Bernard, 165.
Saint Louis (roi), 160.
Saint-Pol (Cte de), 169.
Sainte-Beuve, 53.
Sainte-Palaye, 139.
Saluce (Mise de), 156.
Savari de Mauléon, 182.
Savinien (le frère), 96, 97, 227.
Schaffhouse, 125.
Schœll (Frédéric), 114.
Séguier (l’abbé), 194.
Silius Italicus, 109.
Simon de Montfort, 169.
Sordel, 153.
Stéphanette de Baulx, 156.
Swynford, 142.
Taillandier (René), 228.

Tallard (Anne, Vtesse de), 156.
Tandon, 194.
Tarif, 118.
Tavan (A.), 61, 73, 94.
Théodoric, 123.
Théroalde, 133.
Thibaut de Champagne, 136.
Thomas (A.), 97, 174.
Tiberge de Séranon, 158, 195.
Titien (le), 166.
Tournier (A.), 93.
Tourtoulon (de), 79, 81, 194.
Trogue-Pompée, 109.
Troubat (Jules), 73.
Troubat (Antoine), 93.
Ulphilas, 117, 118.

Ursynes des Ursières, 156.
Valence, 124.
Vertfeuil, 165.
Victor Hugo, 153.
Vidal (Pierre), 191.
Vienne, 124.
Vigne (l’abbé), 50.
Villemain, 81.
Villeneuve-Esclapon, 79.
Violante (princesse), 154.
Vitet, 97.
Voiture, 153.
W
Wagner-Robier, 93.
Wistace, 152.
Wœlfel, 118.
Xavier de Fourvières (dom), 227.

» de Ricard, 77.
Zacharie, 127.
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
Achard, Dictionnaire provençal et Grammaire

provençale.
Berluc-Pérussis (de), Carte des dialectes et sous-
dialectes provençaux.
Castor (J.-J.), l’Interprète provençal.
Crousillat, la Bresco.
Donadieu, les Précurseurs des Félibres.
Diétrich-Behrens, Bibliographie des patois gallo-
romains (trad. par Rabiet) (1889).
Duclo, Grammaire française expliquée au moyen
de la langue provençale (1826).
Fabre d’Olivet, Poésies occitaniennes et Cours
d’amour (1804).
Féraud, le Saint-Evangile (selon saint Matthieu), en
provençal (1866).
Garcin (E.), Dictionnaire provençal-français (1823-
1841).
Gazier, Lettres à Grégoire sur les patois de France.
Gélu (V.), Chansons provençales (1856).
Honorat, Dictionnaire provençal-français.
Jasmin, Œuvres (1825).
Jourdanne, Histoire du Félibrige.
Laugier de Chartrouse, Nomenclature patoise des
plantes des environs d’Arles (1859).
Laincel (de), Des Troubadours aux Félibres.
Morel (M.), Lou Galoubé (1828).
Papon, Origines et progrès de la langue provençale
(1776) (Histoire de Provence).
Pellas, Dictionnaire provençal-français (1723).
Pierquin de Gembloux, Histoire des patois (1858).
Raynouard, Choix de poésies des Troubadours.
Grammaire romane (1816).
Roumanille, Œuvres (1852).
Roux (J.-L.), Contes daù villagé (1869).
Savinien (le Frère), Grammaire et exercices en
langue provençale à l’usage des écoles primaires
(1882).
Tourtoulon (de), Des parlers populaires comparatifs
entre Vintimille et Antibes (1890).
Vidal, Etude sur les analogies linguistiques du
Roumain et du Provençal (1885).
Villeneuve (de... Christ.), Statistique des Bouches-
du-Rhône (1821).
Xavier de Fourvières (dom), Grammaire provençale
et exercices à l’usage des écoles primaires
(1893).—Lou pichot Trésor daù Félibrige (1901).
TOURS, IMPRIMERIE DESLIS FRÈRES, 6, RUE GAMBETTA.
Au lecteur
L’orthographe d’origine a été conservée et n’a pas été
harmonisée, mais les erreurs clairement introduites par le typographe
ou à l’impression ont été corrigées. Les mots ainsi corrigés sont
soulignés en pointillés. Placez le curseur sur ces mots pour faire
apparaître le texte original. A quelques endroits la ponctuation a été
tacitement corrigée.
La Table des matières ne correspondait pas exactement aux titres
dans le livre. Quelques corrections ont été apportées, qui sont
indiquées comme ci-dessus.
Les notes de bas de page ont été renumérotées et placées à la fin
de chaque chapitre.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LA
PROVENCE: USAGES, COUTUMES, IDIOMES DEPUIS LES
ORIGINES; LE FÉLIBRIGE ET SON ACTION SUR LA LANGUE
PROVENÇALE, AVEC UNE GRAMMAIRE PROVENÇALE
ABRÉGÉE ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions

will be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.

copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright
in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and without
paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General
Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and
distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if
you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the
trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the
Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such
as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and
printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in
the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright
law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the

free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this
work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase
“Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of
the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or
online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and

Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand,
agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to
abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using
and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for
obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms
of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only

be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by
people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
There are a few things that you can do with most Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There
are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™
electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and
help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright
law in the United States and you are located in the United
States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying,
distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project
Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will
support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project
Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms
of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with
its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project

Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other

immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project
Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United

States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United
States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is

derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to
anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges.
If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of
paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use
of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth
in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is

posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder.
Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™
License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright
holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project

Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files
containing a part of this work or any other work associated with
Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or

providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project

Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -

Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If

you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set
forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the

Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500

West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws

regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states

where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot

make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current

donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several

printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.
back

Instant Download PDF Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting Concepts and Practices 6th Edition Granof Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Instant Download PDF Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting Concepts and Practices 6th Edition Granof Solutions Manual Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Government and Not-for-Profit

Accounting Concepts and Practices 6th

Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting Concepts and

Government And Not-For-Profit Accounting Concepts And

Government And Not-For-Profit Accounting Concepts And

Core Concepts of Government and Not For Profit

Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not-for-

Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not for

Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not-for-

Introduction to Governmental and Not-for-Profit

Questions for Review and Discussion

7. Tax Anticipation Notes (TANs) and Revenue Anticipation Notes (RANs) or a

8. Overlapping debt refers to the obligations of property owners within a particular

9. Conduit debt represents bonds or similar instruments issued by a government on

Bond Interest expense $ 3,126

Bond Interest expense $ 3,131

2. Governmental fund statements

Bond Interest expenditure $ 3,000

Bond Interest expenditure $ 3,000

2. No entry would be necessary in a governmental fund to record the conversion of the

3. To adjust accounts assuming state was unable to convert

Other financing sources—proceeds

4. In the government-wide statements the BANs would be reported as a liability

1. Expenditure $ 6.6 Expense $ 7.7

2. Expenditure $ 0.5 Expense $ 0.0

3. Expenditure $ 10.0 Expense $ 20.0

4. Expenditure $ 0.0 Expense $ 0.0

5. Expenditure $ 4.0 Expense $ 3.0

Equipment held under lease $800,000

2. First payment of interest

Capital lease obligations (lease principal) $ 60,694

Depreciation expense $ 80,000

No liability or asset would be recognized. Each lease payment would be reported

Bond Interest expense $1,271,000

Bond Interest expense $1,274,000

The 2011 CAFR can be found at:

City of Austin FY 2011

management; derivative instruments-interest rate swaps; deferred credits and other

3. The summary of changes in long-term obligations (p. 64) indicates an increase in

Construction expenditures $1,000,000

No entry is necessary to record the signing of the lease.

Rent expenditure $ 40,000

Fixed assets—expenditure $ 869,371

Debt service expenditure (lease principal) $ 87,838

Nonreciprocal transfer-out $ 500,000

Compensation expenditure $ 150,000

Compensation expense $ 350,000

Claims and judgments—expense $3,000,000

Construction in process $1,000,000

Rent expense $ 40,000

Vehicles held under lease $ 869,371

Capital lease obligations (lease principal) $ 87,838

Amortization of leasehold $108,671

No entry is necessary to reflect an internal transfer in governmental funds.

Liability for compensated absences $ 150,000

2. First payment of interest

Bond Interest expense $ 165,698

3. Market value of bonds

Present value of 29 coupon payments (an annuity of

Present value of principal payment (a single

b. Assuming no take-out agreement (thereby requiring the bonds to be accounted

If it is unable to do so it should report the debt as a current liability in a

3. TANs should always be reported as a current liability of a governmental fund,