Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download PDF of Innovations in Fermentation and Phytopharmaceutical Technologies 1st Edition - Ebook PDF All Chapter
Full Download PDF of Innovations in Fermentation and Phytopharmaceutical Technologies 1st Edition - Ebook PDF All Chapter
https://ebooksecure.com/download/innovations-in-thermochemical-
technologies-for-biofuel-processing-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/advances-in-supercapacitor-and-
supercapattery-innovations-in-energy-storage-devices-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/biomass-biofuels-biochemicals-
microbial-fermentation-of-biowastes-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/emerging-technologies-in-
engineering-ebook-pdf/
Handbook of Innovations in CNS Regenerative Medicine
1st Edition António Salgado (Editor) - eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/handbook-of-innovations-in-cns-
regenerative-medicine-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/modern-treatment-strategies-for-
marine-pollution-recent-innovations-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/emerging-technologies-in-
environmental-bioremediation-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/microscopy-methods-in-
nanomaterials-characterization-a-volume-in-micro-and-nano-
technologies-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/valorization-of-agri-food-
wastes-and-by-products-recent-trends-innovations-and-
sustainability-challenges-ebook-pdf/
INNOVATIONS IN
FERMENTATION AND
PHYTOPHARMACEUTICAL
TECHNOLOGIES
INNOVATIONS IN
FERMENTATION AND
PHYTOPHARMACEUTICAL
TECHNOLOGIES
Edited by
HRUDAYANATH THATOI
Department of Biotechnology, Maharaja Sriram Chandra
Bhanja Deo University, Baripada, Odisha, India
SONALI MOHAPATRA
Department of Biotechnology, Odisha University
of Technology and Research (Formerly College of
Engineering and Technology), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical
treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such
information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including
parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume
any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-821877-8
Contributors xiii
v
vi Contents
3.6 Conclusion 43
References 43
5.1 Introduction 75
5.2 Considerations for liquid extraction techniques to recover products from
fermentation broths 82
5.3 Liquid membranes in microchannels 84
5.4 Membrane-assisted extraction 93
5.5 Conclusions and outlook 100
References 102
Index 491
Contributors
Sharad Agarwal
School of Basic Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh,
India
Cristóbal N. Aguilar
Bioprocesses and Bioproducts Research Group, Food Research Department, School of
Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico
Daisy Amaya-Chantaca
Bioprocesses and Bioproducts Research Group, Food Research Department; Nano-
bioscience Group, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo,
Coahuila, Mexico
L. Amaya-Delgado
Industrial Biotechnology Unit, Center for Research and Assistance in Technology and
Design of the State of Jalisco, A.C., Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Md Nur Kabidul Azam
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Genetic Engineering and
Biotechnology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore; Department of
Biotechnology, TechB Nutrigenomics, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Roostita Lobo Balia
Veterinary Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung; Faculty
of Animal Husbandry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
Sabyasachi Banerjee
Gupta College of Technological Sciences, Asansol, West Bengal, India
Deepika Baranwal
Department of Home Science, Arya Mahila Post Graduate College, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh,
India
Bikash Chandra Behera
School of Biological Sciences, NISER, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Samuel Shiferaw Biresaw
Department of Biotechnology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Prativa Biswasroy
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University),
Bhuabaneswar, Odisha, India
Sankhadip Bose
Bengal School of Technology, A College of Pharmacy, Hooghly, West Bengal, India
Yana Cahyana
Faculty of Agro-Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
xiii
xiv Contributors
Mónica L. Chávez-González
Nanobioscience Group; Bioprocesses and Bioproducts Research Group, Food Research
Department, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo, Coahuila,
Mexico
Monika Choudhary
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Rajasthan,
India
Gabriel Contreras-Zarazua
Departamento de Ingenierı́a Quı́mica, Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico
Pooja Dange
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Swagat Kumar Das
Department of Biotechnology, Odisha University of Technology and Research (Formerly
College of Engineering and Technology), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Pratik Dash
Department of Biotechnology, Odisha University of Technology and Research (Formerly
College of Engineering and Technology), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Supriya Dash
Department of Biotechnology, Odisha University of Technology and Research (Formerly
College of Engineering and Technology), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Júlio Cesar de Carvalho
Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, ACF
Centro Politecnico, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Paulo Cesar de Souza Kirnev
Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, ACF
Centro Politecnico, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe
Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, ACF
Centro Politecnico, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Rocı́o del Carmen Carranza-Mendez
Bioprocesses and Bioproducts Research Group, Food Research Department;
Nanobioscience Group, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo,
Coahuila, Mexico
Harisankar Dey
P.G. Department of Botany, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Centenary College,
Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Subhasish Dutta
Chemical Engineering Division, Center of Innovative and Applied Bioprocessing (CIAB),
Mohali, Punjab, India
G. Flores-Cosı́o
Industrial Biotechnology Unit, Center for Research and Assistance in Technology and
Design of the State of Jalisco, A.C., Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Contributors xv
Adriana C. Flores-Gallegos
Bioprocesses and Bioproducts Research Group, Food Research Department, School of
Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico
Javier Fontalvo
Laboratory of Process Intensification and Hybrid Systems, Faculty of Engineering and
Architecture, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Campus La Nubia, Manizales, Colombia
J.A. Garcı́a-Bejar
Industrial Biotechnology Unit, Center for Research and Assistance in Technology and
Design of the State of Jalisco, A.C., Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Goutam Ghosh
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University),
Bhuabaneswar, Odisha, India
Angelo G€ ossi
University of Twente, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sustainable Process Technology
Group, Enschede, The Netherlands; University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern
Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Institute for Chemistry and Bioanalytics, Muttenz,
Switzerland
Alok Kumar Gupta
Division of Postharvest Management, ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture
(Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India), Lucknow, Uttar
Pradesh, India
Piyush K. Gupta
School of Basic Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh,
India
Md Nazmul Hasan
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Genetic Engineering and
Biotechnology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh
E.J. Herrera-López
Industrial Biotechnology Unit, Center for Research and Assistance in Technology and
Design of the State of Jalisco, A.C., Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Brenda Huerta-Rosas
Departamento de Ingenierı́a Quı́mica, Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico
Anna Iliná
Nanobioscience Group, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo,
Coahuila, Mexico
Riya Jalan
Department of Biotechnology, MITS School of Biotechnology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Saurabh Kumar Jha
Department of Biotechnology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Sunanda Joshi
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Rajasthan,
India
xvi Contributors
Kanupriya
School of Basic Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh,
India
Upasana Kapoor-Narula
National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India
Amia Khandker
Department of Biotechnology, TechB Nutrigenomics, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Santimoy Khilari
Department of Chemistry, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
Ankit Kumar
School of Basic Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh,
India
Neetu KumraTaneja
Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Food Technology and Entrepreneurship
and Management, Sonipat, Haryana, India
Mega Oktaviani Kurniawan
Faculty of Agro-Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
M. Láinez
Industrial Biotechnology Unit, Center for Research and Assistance in Technology and
Design of the State of Jalisco, A.C., Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Nibedita Lenka
National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India
Abhilasha S. Mathuriya
CRZ and Industry-III, Environmental Impact Assessment Division, Ministry of Environ-
ment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, New Delhi, India
Rashmi Ranjan Mishra
Department of Biotechnology, MITS School of Biotechnology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Balaram Mohapatra
Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,
Bombay, Maharashtra, India
Sonali Mohapatra
Department of Biotechnology, Odisha University of Technology and Research (Formerly
College of Engineering and Technology), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Krishna Kumar Pandey
Department of Physics, School of Basic Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater
Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Soumya Pandit
School of Basic Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh,
India
Contributors xvii
Ami R. Patel
Division of Dairy Microbiology, Mansinhbhai Institute of Dairy & Food Technology-
MIDFT, Mehsana, Gujarat, India
Manish Paul
Department of Biotechnology, Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University, Baripada,
Odisha, India
Alan D. Perez
University of Twente, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sustainable Process Technology
Group, Enschede, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Process Intensification and Hybrid Sys-
tems, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Campus
La Nubia, Manizales, Colombia; University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern
Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Institute for Chemistry and Bioanalytics, Muttenz,
Switzerland
Ashish Prabhu
Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal,
Telangana, India
Deepak Pradhan
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University),
Bhuabaneswar, Odisha, India
Sahdeo Prasad
Department of Immunotherapeutics and Biotechnology, Texas Tech University of Health
Science Center, Abilene, TX, United States
Juan Jose Quiroz-Ramirez
CONACyT-CIATEC A.C Centro de Innovación Aplicada en Tecnologı́as Competitivas,
León, Mexico
Rodolfo Ramos-González
Nanobioscience Group, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo,
Coahuila, Mexico
Lavisha Rao
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Rajasthan,
India
Goutam Rath
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University),
Bhuabaneswar, Odisha, India
Wolfgang Riedl
University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences,
Institute for Chemistry and Bioanalytics, Muttenz, Switzerland
Ana Gabriela Romero-Garcı́a
Departamento de Ingenierı́a Quı́mica, Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico
xviii Contributors
Dibyajyoti Samantaray
Department of Biotechnology, Odisha University of Technology and Research (Formerly
College of Engineering and Technology), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Eduardo Sánchez-Ramı́rez
Departamento de Ingenierı́a Quı́mica, Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico
Jose Sandoval-Cortes
Food Research Department, School of Chemistry, Autonomous University of Coahuila,
Saltillo, Mexico
Nishit Savla
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Boelo Schuur
University of Twente, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sustainable Process Technology
Group, Enschede, The Netherlands
Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández
Departamento de Ingenierı́a Quı́mica, Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico
Leonardo Sepúlveda-Torre
Bioprocesses and Bioproducts Research Group, Food Research Department, School of
Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico
Tushar Ahmed Shishir
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Shyamalini Shyamasuta
Department of Biotechnology, Odisha University of Technology and Research (Formerly
College of Engineering and Technology), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Anjani Sihag
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, Rajasthan, India
Priya Singh
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, Rajasthan, India
Smita Singh
Department of Life Sciences (Food Technology), Graphic Era (Deemed to be) University,
Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Gauri Singhal
Department of Biotechnology, School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Sanskriti University,
Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
Carlos Ricardo Soccol
Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, ACF
Centro Politecnico, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Prem Prakash Srivastav
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur,
Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
Contributors xix
Nidhi Srivastava
Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Saumya Srivastava
Department of Biotechnology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Mayank Taneja
Netaji Subhash Institute of Technology, Dwarka, Delhi, India
Pankaj Taneja
Department of Biotechnology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Mamta Thakur
Department of Food Engineering and Technology, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering
and Technology, Longowal, Punjab, India
Hrudayanath Thatoi
Department of Biotechnology, Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University, Baripada,
Odisha, India
Soubhagya Tripathy
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur,
Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
Gemilang Lara Utama
Faculty of Agro-Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang; Centre for
Environment and Sustainability Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
Deepak Kumar Verma
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur,
Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
Vartika Verma
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Rajasthan,
India
Belay Zeleke
Department of Biotechnology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
This page intentionally left blank
PART A
Concepts of reactor
designing
CHAPTER 1
1.1 Introduction
Algae use light and carbon dioxide to grow in aquatic environments. There are
two types of algae: macro- and microalgae. Due to excessive oil content and
higher biomass production capability in various environments, microalgae
are considered an asset for biofuel production. In recent years, microalgae as
an alternative biofuel feedstock has attracted the interest of researchers, entre-
preneurs, and the general public (ElMekawy et al., 2014). Algal biomass con-
tains three main components: carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids/natural oils
(Fig. 1.1). The natural oil made by microalgae is in the form of tricylglycerol.
Microalgae are therefore the exclusive focus in the algae-to-biodiesel arena.
The large-scale production of microalgal biomass is generally carried out
through cheap and simple open pond technologies. However, there are
some disadvantages with this method such as chance of contamination,
water evaporation, low gas-liquid mass transfer rate, low mixing rate, and
poor temperature control (Chisti, 2007). To overcome such disadvantages,
numerous closed photo bioreactors (PBR) have recently been designed.
This technology is very cost-effective for algal biomass production. It pro-
vides a close environment that can protect the culture from contamination.
Through PBR technologies, different favorable growth conditions such as
pH, temperature, O2, etc., required for microalgal growth can be controlled
more accurately (Tredici et al., 2010).
Fig. 1.1 Different metabolic pathways in microalgae for the synthesis of proteins,
nucleic acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and H2 that are related to biofuel production
(Beer et al., 2009).
Hence, this review aims to elucidate the use of closed PBRs for biodiesel
production using microalgae biomass. Factors affecting biodiesel production
such as different lipid extraction methods and biodiesel detection techniques
are also described in detail.
Fig. 1.2 (A) Design of a tubular photo bioreactor (Tanwar et al., 2010). (B) Three-
dimensional diagram of a tubular photo bioreactor (Bahadar, 2014).
10 and 60 mm, with lengths according to the height of the TPBR designed.
The use of such tubes helps in achieving a high surface-to-volume ratio
(above 100/m), which is one of the main advantages of this design
(Posten, 2009). However, due to huge energy requirements and the greater
cost of investment (particularly for mixing and cooling), their use is very rare
in industries.
Motor
Baffle
Agitator
Fig. 1.3 Schematic diagram of a stirred tank photo bioreactor (Gupta et al., 2015).
homogenization of the growth culture, and the heat transfer of the growth
medium (Fig. 1.3). In this bioreactor, foam breakers are installed to prevent
foaming, CO2 bubblers are fitted at the bottom of the tank to provide a car-
bon source, and CO2 concentration baffles are used to reduce the intensity.
Light sources are provided externally by illumination with fluorescent
lamps. Due to the effective stirring mechanism, the light dispersion rate is
very high in STPBRs, which leads to a lower incidence of dark zones inside
the reactor and higher biomass productivity. However, the low surface-to-
volume ratio of STPBRs reduces the light-harvesting efficiency of the photo
bioreactor.
Air Bubble
Air Sparger
and dark cycles (flashing light effect) as the liquid is circulated regularly from
the central dark zone to the external photic zone at a higher gas flow rate. In
comparison to other bioreactors, BCPBRs are cylindrical vessels with a
height greater than twice the diameter. BCPBRs have several merits such
as low cost, effective mass and heat transfer, higher surface-to-volume ratio,
effective O2 release, and residual gas mixture (Fig. 1.4). Mixing and mass
transfer of CO2 are carried out by a sparger through bubbling the gas
mixture.
in the external loop reactor and the sparger is used in the riser tube for mix-
ing by bubbling the gas. The upward movement of the gas from the sparger
inside the riser decreases the density of the riser, making the liquid move
upward. The gas leaves the liquid in the disengagement zone. The quantity
of gas that does not disengage in the disengagement zone gets trapped by
liquid moving downward in the down comer.
1.2.3 Harvesting
The common harvesting methods include sedimentation, flocculation, cen-
trifugation, filtration, and ultrafiltration. The choice of suitable harvesting
method depends on the algal species, growth medium, desired end product,
and production cost benefit. After cultivation, harvesting is done by separat-
ing the supernatant from the biomass. The separated biomass is dried by
several methods such as spray drying, drum drying, freeze drying, and sun
drying. After harvesting, the algal biomass must be dried as it has a tendency
to spoil after only a few hours in a hot climate (Mondal et al., 2017).
Fig. 1.6 Transesterification of triglycerides extracted from algal oil into biodiesel
(Hossain and Salleh, 2008).
Photo bioreactors for production of biodiesel from algae 11
1.3 Conclusion
In recent years, microalgal species have become the most attractive alterna-
tive fuel source to replace fossil fuel. Although different photo bioreactors
have been designed and developed for the cost-effective production of algal
biomass, much research is still needed to solve the observed limitations.
A super bioreactor should meet the characteristics of proper mixing, light
distribution, temperature control, and maintaining CO2 concentration.
Hence, it may be concluded that substantial investment in the development
of this technology and technical expertise in this area are still required before
biofuel can become a reality.
References
Bahadar, A., 2014. Production of Biodiesel Using Heterogeneous Catalyst and Super Critical
Fluid Extraction (Ph.D. thesis). National University of Sciences & Technology, Pakistan.
Beer, L., Boyd, E., Peter, J., Posewitz, M., 2009. Engineering algae for bio hydrogen and
biofuel production. Biotechnology 20, 264–271.
Bozbas, K., 2008. Biodiesel as an alternative motor fuel: production and policies in the Euro-
pean Union. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 12, 542–552.
Chisti, Y., 2007. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 25, 294–306.
Doran, P.M., 2013. Bioprocess Engineering Principles. vol. 14 Academic Press, New York,
pp. 751–852.
ElMekawy, A., Hegab, H.M., Vanbroekhoven, K., Pant, D., 2014. Techno productive
potential of photosynthetic microbial fuel cells through different configurations. Renew.
Sustain. Energy Rev. 39, 617–627.
Gupta, P.L., Lee, S.M., Choi, H.J., 2015. A mini review: photobioreactors for large scale
algal cultivation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 1409–1417.
Hossain, S., Salleh, A., 2008. Biodiesel fuel production from algae as renewable energy. Am.
J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 4 (3), 250–254.
Kumar, K., Dasgupta, C.N., Nayak, B., Lindblad, P., Das, D., 2011. Development of suitable
photo bioreactors for CO2 sequestration addressing global warming using green algae and
cyanobacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 4945–4953.
Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A., Caetano, N.S., 2010. Microalgae for biodiesel production and
other applications: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 217–232.
Mondal, M., Goswami, S., Ghosh, A., Oinam, G., Tiwari, O.N., Das, P., Gayen, K.,
Mandal, M.K., Halder, G.N., 2017. Production of biodiesel from microalgae through
biological carbon capture: a review. 3 Biotech 7, 99.
Pinho, D.M., Oliveira, R.S., Dos Santos, V.M.L., Marques Welington, F., Pinto, A.C.,
Rezendeb, M.J.C., Suarez, P.A.Z., 2017. Evaluating the potential of biodiesel produc-
tion through microalgae farming in photobioreactor and high rate ponds from wastewa-
ter treatment. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 28 (12), 2429–2437.
12 Innovations in fermentation and phytopharmaceutical technologies
Posten, C., 2009. Design principles of photo-bioreactors for cultivation of microalgae. Eng.
Life Sci. 9, 165–177.
Singh, R.N., Sharma, S., 2012. Development of suitable photobioreactor for algae
production—a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 2347–2353.
Tanwar, D., Khatri, K.K., Ajayata, Sharma, D., Soni, S.L., Mathur, Y.P., 2010.
Microalgae—a second generation biofuel. In: Bernard, J.K. (Ed.), Fuel Efficiency. Nova
Science Publishers, Inc, pp. 1–21.
Tredici, M.R., Chini Zittelli, G., Rodolfi, L., 2010. Photobioreactors. In: Flickinger, M.C.,
Anderson, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology: Bioprocess, Biosepara-
tion, and Cell Technology. vol. 6. Wiley, Hoboken, pp. 3821–3838.
Znad, H., Naderi, G., Ang, H.M., Tade, M.O., 2012. CO2 biomitigation and biofuel pro-
duction using microalgae: photobioreactors developments and future directions. In:
Nawaz, Z. (Ed.), Advances in Chemical Engineering. InTech, pp. 230–244. Available
from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-chemical-engineering/co2-
biomitigation-and-biofuel-productionusing-microalgae-photobioreactors-
developments-and-future-d.
CHAPTER 2
Nomenclature
A cross-sectional area (m2)
C constant of empirical
CS solubility (ppm)
D diameter of bioreactor, vessel, or column (m)
Da rotor/impeller diameters (m)
db bubble diameter (m)
dL local diameter (m)
Dp (%) percentage of cell damage (%)
F pump frequency
g gravitational constant (9.81 m s2)
H liquid height (m)
hD height of gas-liquid dispersion (m)
K consistency index (Pa sn)
K0 solubility constant (mol L1 atm1)
KB friction loss coefficient for column top
ki impeller-dependent constant
kL mass transfer coefficient (m s1)
kLa volumetric oxygen mass transfer coefficient (s1)
KT friction loss coefficient for column bottom
L height of dispersion (m)
Li initial length of the algal filaments (μm)
n flow index in a power-law model ()
N stirrer speed (s1)
Nd number of passes
Np power number
P power input (W)
Q volume flow rate of gas (m3 s1)
QS sparged gas flow rate (m3)
T stirrer diameter (m).
t temp (s)
tm mixing time (s)
U superficial velocity (m s1)
V volume of the liquid in the vessel (m3)
Greek letters
α parameter
γ shear rate (s1)
ε energy dissipation rate (W kg1)
λ characteristic material time (s)
μ viscosity (Pa s)
μa apparent viscosity according to the Ostwald-de Waele model (Pa s)
ν cinematic viscosity (m2 s1)
ρ density (kg m3)
σ interfacial tension (N m1)
τ shear stress (Pa)
υs solid volume fraction
ϕ gas holdup ()
ϕL volume fractions of liquid phases ()
ϕs volume fractions of solid phases ()
Superindices
av average
d the downcomer
G gas
Gr gas rising
L liquid
r the riser
2.1 Introduction
Agitation is necessary for high-productivity microalgal cultures. In a static
culture, two situations can be observed: (1) cells deposit on the bottom of
the photobioreactor, or (2) cells accumulate close to the air-culture inter-
face. These conditions limit productivity due to mutual shading, exhaustion
of carbon dioxide (CO2), and an increase in the concentration of oxygen
(O2), thus causing photo-oxidation, among other problems. Agitation
improves mass transfer (supply of CO2 and removal of O2), homogeneous
distribution of nutrients and temperature, and exposure to light throughout
cell suspension.
Mixing and agitation in photobioreactors 15
effect of partial pressure. In the bubble’s interaction with the liquid, internal
pressure increases, forcing solubilization. The dissolved gas molecules are
transferred to the liquid-solid interface (e.g., a cell surface) and then absorbed
after diffusion (Garcia-Ochoa and Gomez, 2009).
The gas transfer rate is low, governed by diffusion. This phenomenon
can be described by Fick’s law. The gas flow is given by a specific diffusion
constant for the gas in the liquid and is influenced by a driving force (var-
iation of gas concentration in the liquid) in a unidirectional trajectory.
Through some considerations, it is possible to express the gas flow in the
gas accumulation rate correlating to how much is added to the system
(gas transfer rate, GTR) and how much is consumed by the microorganism
(gas consumption or uptake rate, GUR). The GUR depends on the specific
rate of gas consumption and the concentration of biomass. GTR is due to
the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) and a gas concentration gradi-
ent (Garcia-Ochoa and Gomez, 2009).
The kLa is one of the most important parameters in gas-liquid mass
transfer, with dimensional and dimensionless equations found in the lit-
erature for the volumetric mass transfer coefficient as a function of differ-
ent variables. However, there are discrepancies between the estimated
and empirical values of kLa, related to the strong influence of the type
of equipment geometry and the system’s physicochemical properties
(Garcia-Ochoa and Gomez, 1998, 2004, 2009). Some of these equations
are presented for each type of photobioreactor and are shown below:
Stirred tank (Schl€ uter and Deckwer, 1992)
Motor
a) d) Impeller
Bubble
Baffle
Impeller
Sparger
b) c) e)
Fig. 2.1 Stirred tank, raceway photobioreactor, and three main impellers used in
microalgae culture.
Mixing and agitation in photobioreactors 19
impellers create preferentially radial flows, and when operated at high speeds, dis-
placing the fluid also at high speed, create a vortex that promotes little mixing
(McCabe et al., 1993; Menegalli and Ortega, 2012).
Turbines (Fig. 2.1C) are effective in a wide viscosity range. In low-viscosity
liquids, the turbines generate strong currents that persist throughout the vessel,
moving all stagnant regions. Near the impeller, there is a zone of fast currents,
high turbulence, and intense shear. The flow is preferably radial and tangential.
The tangential components induce vortex and swirling, which must be inter-
rupted by deflectors or diffuser rings for the mixing to be more effective
(McCabe et al., 1993).
The typical impellers discussed for closed systems are used not only for
microalgae cultivation but for most biotechnological processes involving
microorganisms. However, for open microalgal systems, mixing and stirring
are commonly promoted by a set of blades arranged perpendicular to the liq-
uid, known as paddle wheels (Fig. 2.1E). This device is considered the most
efficient for tanks, ponds, raceways (Fig. 2.1D), and other open systems. They
are operated to reach liquid velocity between 15 and 30 cm s1. Paddlewheels
are found in various configurations: flat, zigzagged, back-curved, and
forward-curved. Each configuration directly impacts the power consumed
to stir the liquid, requiring different predictive models (Chiaramonti et al.,
2013; Li et al., 2014).
Fig. 2.2 Power number. Note: (1) Disk and blades W/D ¼ 1/5; (2) vertical blades
W/D ¼ 1/5; (3) curved blade W/D ¼ 1/8; (4) pitched blade W/D ¼ 1/8. (Based on
Couper, J.R., Penney, W.R., Fair, J.R., Wallas, S.M., 2005. Chemical Process Equipment:
Selection and Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-08248-0.)
P ¼ Np N 3 ρL D5 (2.7)
ρL ND2
Reimpeller ¼ (2.8)
μ
The calculations to determine the power required by impellers are for a
system without aeration; for microalgal production, there is a need for gas
injection to supply a carbon source. When aeration power is considered,
a 50% drop in the required agitation power is generally observed. This
reduction in energy consumption is due to the change in the wake regions
behind the gas dispersion impeller blades, which decreases the drag force and
the effective density of the two-phase gas-liquid system (Lueske et al., 2015).
PG
0:5 (2.9)
P
Without a draft tube, valid for volumes up to 50 m3 and gas surface veloc-
ity up to 0.053 m s1 (Hughmark, 1980).
0:2
Pg Qg 0:25 N 2 Da
¼ 0:1 (2.10)
P N V g W V 0:67
Mixing and agitation in photobioreactors 21
With a draft tube, where a, b, c, and d are constant in the draft tube and
correspond to 2.6, 335.0, 2.0, and 0.5, respectively (Lueske et al., 2015).
Pg 1 1
¼ c d + 1 d (2.11)
P Qg a
a+ b
N D3a
Motor
Baffle
Impeller
Bubble
Sparger
a) b) c) d)
Fig. 2.3 Flow patterns on mechanical agitation.
gas flow; and (D) high rotation and low gas flow. From these conditions,
three situations can be considered: impeller flooding (A), impeller loading
without gas (B and C), and impeller loading with gas (D) (BIOTOL Pro-
ject et al., 1992).
When the agitation is operated at low speed and high gas flow, the impel-
ler remains immersed in the liquid and surrounded by the gas. There is also
little external dispersion of bubbles toward the vessel wall, which makes the
liquid movement weak because the “gas cover” prevents the impeller from
effectively pumping, compromising mixing and mass transfer (Doran, 2013;
Nienow, 1977).
In cases B and C, low to moderate rotation and moderate to high gas
flow, the gas dominates the flow pattern due to the impeller being loaded
with liquid and surrounded by gas, with poor mixing and mass transfer
efficiency, although more significant than in case A. In the last condition
(D), high rotation and low gas flow, the impeller is loaded by the gas,
which provides a homogeneous distribution of the gas on the liquid
phase, that is, the ideal mixing condition and mass transfer (Doran,
2013; Nienow, 1977).
for the fluid composition to reach a specified level of homogeneity after add-
ing a marker pulse at a single point in the photobioreactor (Hadjiev
et al., 2006).
Mixing systems generally estimate the mixing time for turbulent condi-
tions, which are more effective for homogenization and mass transfer. The
mixing time can be determined with 95% reliability for a stirring system with
an impeller, regardless of the type of configuration (Xie et al., 2014) by the
following expression:
1 1
2 P 3 Da 3
tm ¼ 5:9 T 3 (2.13)
ρV T
When the system is aerated, there are some correlations where the geom-
etry of the photobioreactor and the gas flow is linked (Ascanio, 2015):
0 1
13 1 2 4 1
aH + T T 6 W Qs 12@N Da A 15
Ntm ¼ 20:41 2 (2.14)
T Da Da NV gW V 3
VII
A Job in London
YET London was not wholly Hell, for it was possible for me to
compose poetry some of the time. No place can be altogether a
God-forsaken Sahara or swamp in which a man is able to discipline
and compose his emotions into self-expression. In London I wrote
"Flame-heart."
So much I have forgotten in ten years,
So much in ten brief years! I have forgot
What time the purple apples come to juice,
And what month brings the shy forget-me-not.
I have forgot the special, startling season
Of the pimento's flowering and fruiting;
What time of year the ground doves brown the fields
And fill the noonday with their curious fluting.
I have forgotten much, but still remember
The poinsettia's red, blood-red in warm December.
My mother is Zebeeda,
I disavow not her name and I am Antar,
But I am not vainglorious ...
Her dark complexion sparkles like a sabre in the shades of night
And her shape is like the well-formed spear....
To me these verses of Antar written more than twelve centuries ago
are more modern and full of meaning for a Negro than is Homer.
Perhaps if black and mulatto children knew more of the story and the
poetry of Antar, we might have better Negro poets. But in our Negro
schools and colleges we learn a lot of Homer and nothing of Antar.
PART THREE
NEW YORK HORIZON
IX
Back in Harlem
LIKE fixed massed sentinels guarding the approaches to the great
metropolis, again the pyramids of New York in their Egyptian majesty
dazzled my sight like a miracle of might and took my breath like the
banging music of Wagner assaulting one's spirit and rushing it
skyward with the pride and power of an eagle.
The feeling of the dirty steerage passage across the Atlantic was
swept away in the immense wonder of clean, vertical heaven-
challenging lines, a glory to the grandeur of space.
Oh, I wished that it were possible to know New York in that way only
—as a masterpiece wrought for the illumination of the sight, a
splendor lifting aloft and shedding its radiance like a searchlight,
making one big and great with feeling. Oh, that I should never draw
nearer to descend into its precipitous gorges, where visions are
broken and shattered and one becomes one of a million, average,
ordinary, insignificant.
At last the ship was moored and I came down to the pavement. Ellis
Island: doctors peered in my eyes, officials scrutinized my passport,
and the gates were thrown open.
The elevated swung me up to Harlem. At first I felt a little fear and
trembling, like a stray hound scenting out new territory. But soon I
was stirred by familiar voices and the shapes of houses and saloons,
and I was inflated with confidence. A wave of thrills flooded the
arteries of my being, and I felt as if I had undergone initiation as a
member of my tribe. And I was happy. Yes, it was a rare sensation
again to be just one black among many. It was good to be lost in the
shadows of Harlem again. It was an adventure to loiter down Fifth
and Lenox avenues and promenade along Seventh Avenue.
Spareribs and corn pone, fried chicken and corn fritters and sweet
potatoes were like honey to my palate.
There was a room for me in the old house on One Hundred Thirty-
first Street, but there was no trace of Manda. I could locate none of
my close railroad friends. But I found Sanina. Sanina was an
attractive quadroon from Jamaica who could pass as white. Before
prohibition she presided over a buffet flat. Now she animated a cosy
speakeasy. Her rendezvous on upper Seventh Avenue, with its pink
curtains and spreads, created an artificial rose-garden effect. It was
always humming like a beehive with brown butterflies and flames of
all ages from the West Indies and from the South.
Sanina infatuated them all. She possessed the cunning and
fascination of a serpent, and more charm than beauty. Her clients
idolized her with a loyalty and respect that were rare. I was never
quite sure what was the secret of her success. For although she was
charming, she was ruthless in her affairs. I felt a congeniality and
sweet nostalgia in her company, for we had grown up together from
kindergarten. Underneath all of her shrewd New York getting-byness
there was discernible the green bloom of West Indian naïveté. Yet
her poise was a marvel and kept her there floating like an
imperishable block of butter on the crest of the dark heaving wave of
Harlem. Sanina always stirred me to remember her dominating
octoroon grandmother (who was also my godmother) who beat her
hard white father in a duel they fought over the disposal of her body.
But that is a West Indian tale.... I think that some of Sanina's success
came from her selectiveness. Although there were many lovers
mixing up their loving around her, she kept herself exclusively for the
lover of her choice.
I passed ten days of purely voluptuous relaxation. My fifty dollars
were spent and Sanina was feeding me. I was uncomfortable. I
began feeling intellectual again. I wrote to my friend, Max Eastman,
that I had returned to New York. My letter arrived at precisely the
right moment. The continuation of The Liberator had become a
problem. Max Eastman had recently resigned the editorship in order
to devote more time to creative writing. Crystal Eastman also was
retiring from the management to rest and write a book on feminism.
Floyd Dell had just published his successful novel, Moon Calf, and
was occupied with the writing of another book.
Max Eastman invited me to Croton over the week-end to discuss the
situation. He proposed to resume the editorship again if I could
manage the sub-editing that Floyd Dell did formerly. I responded with
my hand and my head and my heart. Thus I became associate editor
of The Liberator. My experience with the Dreadnought in London
was of great service to me now.
The times were auspicious for the magazine. About the time that I
was installed it received a windfall of $11,000 from the government,
which was I believe a refund on mailing privileges that had been
denied the magazine during the war.
Soon after taking on my job I called on Frank Harris, I took along an
autographed copy of Spring in New Hampshire, the book of verses
that I had published in London. The first thing Frank Harris asked
was if I had seen Bernard Shaw. I told him all about my visit and
Shaw's cathedral sermon. Harris said that perhaps Shaw was getting
religion at last and might die a good Catholic. Harris was not as well-
poised as when I first met him. Pearson's Magazine was not making
money, and he was in debt and threatened with suspension of
publication. He said he desired to return to Europe where he could
find leisure to write, that he was sick and tired of the editor business.
He did not congratulate me on my new job. The incident between
him and The Liberator was still a rancor in his mind. He wasn't a
man who forgot hurts easily.
But he was pleased that I had put over the publication of a book of
poems in London. "It's a hard, mean city for any kind of genius," he
said, "and that's an achievement for you." He looked through the little
brown-covered book. Then he ran his finger down the table of
contents closely scrutinizing. I noticed his aggressive brow become
heavier and scowling. Suddenly he roared: "Where is the poem?"
"Which one?" I asked with a bland countenance, as if I didn't know
which he meant.
"You know which," he growled. "That fighting poem, 'If We Must Die.'
Why isn't it printed here?"
I was ashamed. My face was scorched with fire. I stammered: "I was
advised to keep it out."
"You are a bloody traitor to your race, sir!" Frank Harris shouted. "A
damned traitor to your own integrity. That's what the English and
civilization have done to your people. Emasculated them. Deprived
them of their guts. Better you were a head-hunting, blood-drinking
cannibal of the jungle than a civilized coward. You were bolder in
America. The English make obscene sycophants of their subject
peoples. I am Irish and I know. But we Irish have guts the English
cannot rip out of us. I'm ashamed of you, sir. It's a good thing you got
out of England. It is no place for a genius to live."
Frank Harris's words cut like a whip into my hide, and I was glad to
get out of his uncomfortable presence. Yet I felt relieved after his
castigation. The excision of the poem had been like a nerve cut out
of me, leaving a wound which would not heal. And it hurt more every
time I saw the damned book of verse. I resolved to plug hard for the
publication of an American edition, which would include the omitted
poem. "A traitor," Frank Harris had said, "a traitor to my race." But I
felt worse for being a traitor to myself. For if a man is not faithful to
his own individuality, he cannot be loyal to anything.
I soon became acquainted and friendly with The Liberator
collaborators and sympathizers: Art Young, Boardman Robinson,
Stuart Davis, John Barber, Adolph Dehn, Hugo Gellert, Ivan Opfer,
Maurice Becker, Maurice Sterne, Arturo Giovanitti, Roger Baldwin,
Louis Untermeyer, Mary Heaton Vorse, Lydia Gibson, Cornelia
Barnes, Genevieve Taggard. William Gropper and Michael Gold
became contributing editors at the same time that I joined The
Liberator staff.