Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instant Download PDF Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis Canadian 7th Edition Horngren Solutions Manual Full Chapter
Instant Download PDF Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis Canadian 7th Edition Horngren Solutions Manual Full Chapter
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-canadian-7th-edition-horngren-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-canadian-8th-edition-horngren-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-canadian-6th-edition-horngren-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-13th-edition-horngren-solutions-manual/
Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis 2nd Edition
Horngren Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-2nd-edition-horngren-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-14th-edition-horngren-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-canadian-15th-edition-horngren-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-canadian-6th-edition-horngren-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-14th-edition-horngren-test-bank/
CHAPTER 6
MASTER BUDGET AND RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING
SHORT-ANSWER QUESTIONS
6-3 Plans can and sometimes should be changed if the feedback indicates an
assumption used in the budget was wrong. If the feedback indicates the plan was
reasonable, then it is necessary to understand the issues preventing the achievement of
the planned results and implement an appropriate remedy.
6-4 Strategy, plans, and budgets are interrelated and affect one another. Strategy is a
broad term that usually means selection of overall objectives. Strategic analysis underlies
both long-run and short-run planning. In turn, these plans lead to the formulation of
budgets. Budgets provide feedback to managers about the likely effects of their strategic
plans. Managers use this feedback to revise their strategic plans.
6-5 Yes, budgeted performance is better than past performance for judging managers.
Why? Mainly because inefficiencies included in past results can be detected and
eliminated in budgeting. Also, new opportunities in the future, which did not exist in the
past, may otherwise be ignored if past performance is used.
6-6 A company that shares its own internal budget information with other companies
can gain multiple benefits. One benefit is better coordination with suppliers, which can
reduce the likelihood of supply shortages. Better coordination with customers can result
6-7 A rolling budget is a budget or plan that is always available for a specified future
period by adding a month, quarter, or year in the future as the month, quarter, or year
just ended is dropped. For example, a 12-month rolling budget for the March 2015 to
February 2016 period becomes a 12-month rolling budget for the April 2015 to March
2016 period the next month, and so on.
6-9 The revenue budget is typically the cornerstone for budgeting because production
(and hence costs) and inventory levels generally depend on the forecasted level of
demand and revenue.
6-11 Padding is when budget figures are either inflated (in the case of expenses) or
deflated (in the case of revenues) in order to make it easier to achieve them during the
actual operations of the firm. This makes it easier for managers to meet their budget
targets and earn performance bonuses. Senior managers should look at outside (external)
data to see if the internal budgets are reasonable. Senior managers should also be familiar
with the operations of the firms—this will make it easier for them to spot unreasonable
budget estimates.
6-12 Non-output-based cost drivers can be incorporated into budgeting by the use of
activity-based budgeting (ABB). ABB focuses on the budgeted cost of activities necessary
to produce and sell products and services. Non-output-based cost drivers, such as the
number of part numbers, number of batches, and number of new products, can be used
with ABB.
6-13 The choice of a responsibility centre type guides the variables to be included in the
budgeting exercise. For example, if a revenue centre is chosen, the focus will be on
variables that assist in forecasting revenue. Factors related to, say, costs of the investment
base will be considered only if they assist in forecasting revenue.
EXERCISES
A cash cycle, also known as an operating cycle, is the movement of cash arising from
business functions to inventories, to receivables, and back to cash when outputs are sold.
It is a self-liquidating cycle where all costs of a corporation are recovered when output is
sold. Budgetary slack is the practice of underestimating revenue and overestimating costs
to make budget constraints less challenging. Once the corporate budget is produced, all
managers make a commitment to reach budget targets. They are responsible for
controllable cost that must be at or below the budget constraint during each reporting time
period. Some companies produce a rolling budget that adds a reporting time period as one
is completed. An investment budget affects the flow in and out of cash either to make the
investment or to pay to finance it.
1. (a) Salesperson
(b) VP of sales
Permit the salesperson to offer a reasonable discount to customers, but require
that he/she clear bigger discounts with the VP. Also, base his/her
bonus/performance evaluation not just on revenue generated, but also on
margins (or, ability to meet budget).
2. (a) VP of sales
(b) VP of sales
VP of sales should compare budgeted sales with actuals, and ask for an analysis
of all the sales during the quarter. Discuss with salespeople why so many
discounts are being offered—and if they are really needed to close each sale. Are
our prices too high (i.e., uncompetitive)?
4. (a) HR department
(b) Production supervisor
The production supervisor should devise his or her own educational standards
that all new plant employees are held to before they are allowed to work on the
plant floor. Offer remedial in-plant training to those workers who show promise.
Be very specific about the types of skills required when using the HR department
to hire plant workers. Test the workers periodically for required skills.
6-17 (30 min.) Budgeting: direct material usage, manufacturing cost, and gross
margin.
1.
Direct Material Usage Budget in Quantity and Dollars
Material
Wool Dye Total
Physical Units Budget
Direct materials required for
Blue Rugs (100,000 rugs × 30 skeins and 0.5 gal.) 3,000,0000 skeins 50,000 gal.
Cost Budget
Available from beginning direct materials inventory
(under a FIFO cost-flow assumption)
Wool: 349,000 skeins $ 715,450
Dye: 5,000 gallons $ 24,850
To be purchased this period
Wool: (3,000,000 - 349,000) skeins × $2 per skein 5,302,000
Dye: (50,000 – 5,000) gal. × $5 per gal. _________ 225,000
Direct materials to be used this period: (a) + (b) $6,017,450 $ 249,850 $6,267,300
2.
Weaving budgeted = $18,852,000
= $3.3664 per DMLH
overhead rate 5,600,000 DMLH
1 0.15 machine hour per skein 30 skeins per rug = 4.5 machine-hrs. per rug.
4. Revenue budget
Selling
Units Price Total Revenue
Blue Rugs 100,000 $2,000 $200,000,000
Blue Rugs 95,000 $2,000 $190,000,000
6.
100,000 rugs sold 95,000 rugs sold
Revenue $200,000,000 $190,000,000
Less: Cost of goods sold 121,928,300 115,832,750
Gross margin $ 78,071,700 $ 74,167,250
2.
2015 Planned 2016 Expected 2016 Expected 2016
McGrath & Sons Volume Selling Prices Change in Volume Volume
Radon Tests 11,000 $250 +5% 11,550
Lead Tests 15,200 $190 -5% 14,440
Expected revenue at the new 2016 prices are $5,631,100, which are greater than the
expected 2015 revenue of $5,623,500 if the prices are unchanged. So, if the goal is to
maximize sales revenue and if Jim McGrath’s forecasts are reliable, the company
should lower its price for a lead test in 2016.
Direct Materials
(in litres)
Direct materials needed for production (54,350 3) 163,050
Add target ending direct materials inventory 110,000
Total requirements 273,050
Deduct beginning direct materials inventory 117,350
Direct materials to be purchased 155,700
6-23 (15-20 min.) Budgeting revenue, cost of sales, and gross margin.
Whimsy Gifts
Budgeted Revenue
For the Quarter Ending December 31
Total
for the
October November December Quarter
Cash sales $14,000 $16,300 $21,100 $51,400
Credit card sales:
$ 9,800 0.96 9,408
$11,200 0.96 10,752
$15,800 0.96 15,168 35,328
Net sales 23,408 27,052 36,268 86,728
Cost of goods sold, at
40% of net sales 9,363 10,821 14,507 34,691
Gross margin $14,045 $16,231 $21,761 $52,037
Some students may think that a 60% gross margin is high. However, this gross margin is
before deducting many operating costs such as rent, advertising, and sales commissions.
6-25 (15-25 min.) Budgets for production and direct manufacturing labour.
All Frame Company
Budget for Production and Direct Manufacturing Labour
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
January February March Quarter
Budgeted sales (units) 10,000 12,000 8,000 30,000
Add target ending finished goods inventory* (units) 16,000 12,500 13,500 13,500
Total requirements (units) 26,000 24,500 21,500 43,500
Deduct beginning finished goods inventory (units) 16,000 16,000 12,500 16,000
Units to be produced 10,000 8,500 9,000 27,500
Direct manufacturing labour-hours (DMLH) per unit 2.0 2.0 1.5
Total hours of direct manufacturing labour time needed 20,000 17,000 13,500 50,500
Direct manufacturing labour costs:
Wages ($10.00 per DMLH) $200,000 $170,000 $135,000 $505,000
Pension contributions ($0.50 per DMLH) 10,000 8,500 6,750 25,250
Workers’ compensation insurance ($0.15 per DMLH) 3,000 2,550 2,025 7,575
Employee medical insurance ($0.40 per DMLH) 8,000 6,800 5,400 20,200
Employment insurance (employer’s share)
($10.00 0.075 = $0.75 per DMLH) 15,000 12,750 10,125 37,875
Total direct manufacturing labour costs $236,000 $200,600 $159,300 $595,900
*100% of the first following month’s sales plus 50% of the second following month’s sales.
Note that the employee employment insurance levy of 7.5% is irrelevant. Such taxes are withheld from employees’ wages
and paid to the government by the employer on behalf of the employees; therefore, the employee 7.5% amounts are not
additional costs to the employer.
1. The cash that TabComp Inc. can expect to collect during April 2016 is calculated
below:
April cash receipts:
April cash sales ($400,000 .25) $100,000
April credit card sales ($400,000 .30 .96) 115,200
Collections on account:
March ($480,000 .45 .70) 151,200
February ($500,000 .45 .28) 63,000
January (uncollectable–not relevant) 0
Total collections $429,400
MZB-33
Units
March sales 110
Plus: Ending inventorya 27
Total needed 137
Less: Beginning inventoryb 33
Projected purchases in units 104
3. Monthly cash budgets are prepared by companies such as TabComp Inc. in order
to plan for their cash needs. This means identifying when both excess cash and
cash shortages may occur. A company needs to know when cash shortages will
occur so that prior arrangements can be made with lending institutions in order to
have cash available for borrowing when the company needs it. At the same time, a
company should be aware of when there will be excess cash available for
investment or for repaying loans.
1.
Cost Soft Fresh Packaged
Activity Hierarchy Drinks Produce Food Total
Ordering
$90 14; 24; 14 Batch-level $1,260 $ 2,160 $1,260 $ 4,680
Delivery
$82 12; 62; 19 Batch-level 984 5,084 1,558 7,626
Shelf-stocking
$21 16; 172; 94 Output-unit-level 336 3,612 1,974 5,922
Customer support
$0.18 4,600; 34,200; 10,750 Output-unit-level 828 6,156 1,935 8,919
2. Refer to the last row of the table in requirement 1. Fresh produce, which
probably represents the smallest portion of COGS, is the product category that
consumes the largest share (63%) of the indirect resources. Fresh produce
demands the highest level of ordering, delivery, shelf-stocking, and customer
support resources of all three product categories—it has to be ordered, delivered,
and stocked in small, perishable batches, and supermarket customers often ask
for a lot of guidance on fresh produce items.
1.
Budgeted Cost-Driver Rates
Activity Cost Hierarchy January February March
Ordering Batch-level $90.00 $89.82 $89.64
Delivery Batch-level 82.00 81.84 81.67
Shelf-stocking Output-unit- 21.00 20.96 20.92
Customer level 0.18 0.18 0.179
support Output-unit-
level
The March 2016 rates can be used to compute the total budgeted cost for each
activity area in March 2016:
Shelf- Customer
Ordering Delivery Stocking Support
Exercise 6-27 $4,680 $7,626 $5,922 $8,919
Exercise 6-28 (Kaizen) 4,661 7,596 5,899 8,869
The kaizen budget number will show unfavourable variances for managers
whose activities do not meet the required monthly cost reductions. This likely
will put more pressure on managers to creatively seek out cost reductions by
working “smarter” within YM or by having “better” interactions with suppliers
or customers.
One limitation of kaizen budgeting, as illustrated in this question, is that it
assumes small incremental improvements each month. It is possible that some
cost improvements arise from large discontinuous changes in operating
processes, supplier networks, or customer interactions. Companies need to
highlight the importance of seeking these large discontinuous improvements as
well as the small incremental improvements.
PROBLEMS
This is a routine budgeting problem. The key to its solution is to compute the correct
quantities of finished goods and direct materials. Use the following general formula:
1. Fraser Corporation
Revenue Budget
For 2016
2. Fraser Corporation
Production Budget (in units)
For 2016
Widget Thingamajig
Budgeted sales in units 60,000 40,000
Add target finished goods inventories,
December 31, 2016 27,000 11,000
Total requirements 87,000 51,000
Deduct finished goods inventories,
January 1, 2016 22,000 10,000
Units to be produced 65,000 41,000
3. Fraser Corporation
Direct Materials Purchases Budget (in quantities) for 2016
Direct Materials
A B C
Direct materials to be used in production
• Widget (budgeted production of 65,000
units times 4 kg of A, 2 kg of B) 260,000 130,000 —
• Thingamajig (budgeted production of 41,000
units times 5 kg of A, 3 kg of B, 1 unit of C) 205,000 123,000 41,000
Total 465,000 253,000 41,000
Add target ending inventories, December 31, 2016 36,000 32,000 7,000
Total requirements in quantities 501,000 285,000 48,000
Deduct beginning inventories, January 1, 2016 32,000 29,000 6,000
Direct materials to be purchased (quantities) 469,000 256,000 42,000
4. Fraser Corporation
Direct Materials Purchases Budget (in dollars) for 2016
Budgeted Expected
Purchases Purchase
(Quantities) Price per Unit Total
Direct material A 469,000 $14 $6,566,000
Direct material B 256,000 7 1,792,000
Direct material C 42,000 5 210,000
Budgeted purchases $8,568,000
5. Fraser Corporation
Direct Manufacturing Labour Budget for 2016
Direct
Budgeted Manufacturing Rate
Production Labour-Hours Total per
(Units) per Unit Hours Hour Total
Widget 65,000 2 130,000 $15 $1,950,000
Thingamajig 41,000 3 123,000 19 2,337,000
Total $4,287,000
6. Fraser Corporation
Budgeted Finished Goods Inventory
At December 31, 2016
Widget:
Direct materials costs:
A, 4 kilograms at $14 $56
B, 2 kilograms at $7 14 $70
Direct manufacturing labour costs, 2 hours at $15 30
Manufacturing overhead costs at $24 per direct
manufacturing labour-hour (2 hours) 48
Budgeted manufacturing costs per unit $148
Thingamajig:
Direct materials costs:
A, 5 kilograms at $14 $70
B, 3 kilograms at $7 21
C, 1 each at $5 5 $96
Direct manufacturing labour costs, 3 hours at $19 57
Manufacturing overhead costs at $24 per direct
manufacturing labour-hour (3 hours) 72
Budgeted manufacturing costs per unit $225
Easecom Company
Budgeted Operating Income Statement for 2016
(in thousands)
Revenue
Equipment ($6,000 × 1.06 × 1.10) $6,996
Maintenance contracts ($1,800 × 1.06) 1,908
Total revenue $8,904
Cost of goods sold ($4,600 × 1.03 × 1.06) 5,022
Gross margin 3,882
Operating costs:
Marketing costs ($600 + $250) 850
Distribution costs ($150 × 1.06) 159
Customer maintenance costs ($1,000 + $130) 1,130
Administrative costs 900
Total operating costs 3,039
Operating income $ 843
1. Revenue Budget
Executive Line Director Line Total
Units sold 740 390
Unit selling price $1,224 $1,920
Budgeted revenue $905,760 $748,800 $1,654,560
Director Line:
4. Budgeted input per f.g. unit — 2.3 m2 — 4
5. Budgeted production — 400 — 400
6. Budgeted usage — 920 — 1,600
1.
Revenues Budget
For the Year Ending December 31, 2016
Selling Total
Units Price Revenues
Chairs 172,000 $ 80 $13,760,000
Tables 45,000 $900 $40,500,000
Total $54,260,000
3.
Production Budget (in Units)
For the Year Ending December 31, 2016
Product
Chairs Tables
Budgeted unit sales 172,000 45,000
Add target ending finished goods inventory 8,500 2,250
Total required units 180,500 47,250
Deduct beginning finished goods inventory 8,000 2,100
Units of finished goods to be produced 172,500 45,150
Note that purchases are 0.7 of next month’s sales, as gross margin averages 30% of
sales (given).
9. All of the transactions have been simplified—for example, no bad debts are
considered. Also, many businesses face wide fluctuation of cash flows within a
month. For example, perhaps customer receipts lag and are bunched together near
the end of a month and disbursements are due evenly throughout the month or
are bunched near the beginning of the month. Cash requirements would then need
to be evaluated on a weekly and perhaps daily basis rather than on a monthly
basis. Consider also that borrowing and payment are not necessarily always done
on the first and last day of each month.
Enough cash should be available for repayment of the note on January 31, 2016.
December January
Cash disbursements:
For previous month’s purchases at 50% $110,250 $110,250
For current month’s purchases at 50% 110,250 59,850
$220,500 $170,100
Also:
[b] Ending Inventory Nov. = 500 units + 0.25 (360,000 ÷ 120) = 1,250
$480,000 – $180,000
Variable cost ratio to sales = = 1/6 (= 0.167)
$1,800,000
1.
Revenue Budget
For the Quarter Ending March 31
Units 20,000
Selling price $120
Total revenue $2,400,000
2.
Direct Material Usage Budget in Quantity and Dollars
For the Quarter Ending March 31
Physical units budget
Direct materials required
(20,000 units 10 g) 200,000 g
Cost budget
To be purchased this period
(200,000 g $4/g) $800,000
Direct materials to be used this period $800,000
3.
Direct Manufacturing Labour Costs Budget
For the Quarter Ending March 31
Output units produced 20,000
Direct manufacturing labour-hours per unit 2
Total direct manufacturing labour-hours 40,000
Hourly wage rate $15
Total direct manufacturing labour costs $600,000
4.
Manufacturing Overhead Costs Budget
For the Quarter Ending March 31
Machine setup overhead
(400 setup-hours $80 per hour) $32,0001
Operations overhead
(40,000 hours $1.60 per hour) 64,000
Total manufacturing overhead costs $96,000
1 (20,000 units/100units) = 200 batches. Each batch requires 2 setup hours, so 200
5.
Budgeted Unit Cost
For the Quarter Ending March 31
Cost per
Unit of Input per
Input Unit of Output Total
Direct material $ 4 10 g $40.00
Direct manufacturing labour 15 2 DMLH 30.00
Machine setup overhead 80 0.02 setup-hours1 1.60
Operations overhead 1.60 2 DMLH 3.20
Total cost per gizmo $74.80
1Setup-hours per gizmo = 400 setup-hours ÷ 20,000 gizmos = 0.02 setup-hours per
gizmo.
Alternatively,
Budgeted Unit Cost
For the Quarter Ending March 31
Total Per unit
(1) (2) = (1) ÷ 20,000
Direct material costs
(requirement 2) $ 800,000 $40.00
Direct manufacturing labour costs
(requirement 3) 600,000 30.00
Machine setup overhead costs
(requirement 4) 32,000 1.60
Operations overhead costs
(requirement 4) 64,000 3.20
Total costs $1,496,000 $74.80
6.
Cost of Goods Sold Budget
For the Quarter Ending March 31
Total
Beginning finished goods inventory, Jan. 1 $ 72,000
Direct materials used $800,000
Direct manufacturing labour 600,000
Manufacturing overhead 96,000
Cost of goods manufactured 1,496,000
Cost of goods available for sale 1,568,000
Deduct: Ending finished goods inventory,
Mar. 31a 74,800
Cost of goods sold $1,493,200
aUnder FIFO cost flow assumption, the 1,000 gizmos in ending finished goods
inventory on March 31 will be valued at $74,800 (= 1,000 units × $74.80/unit).
7.
Budgeted Gross Margin
For the Quarter Ending March 31
Revenue $2,400,000
Cost of goods sold 1,493,200
Gross margin $ 906,800
8.
1st Quarter Proposed 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter Revised
Quantity Decrease Revised Quantity Quantity
(1) (2) (3) = (1)×(100% ─ (2)) (4) = (3)×(100% ─ (2))
Direct material 10 oz 1% 9.9 g 9.8 g
Direct manufacturing labour 2 DMLH 1% 1.98 DMLH 1.96 DMLH
Machine setup overhead 0.02 setup-hours 3% 0.0194 setup-hours 0.01882 setup-hours
Operations overhead 2 DMLH 1% 1.98 DMLH 1.96 DMLH
1.
Revenue Budget
For the Month of April
2.
Production Budget
For the Month of April
Product
Cat-allac Dog-eriffic
Budgeted unit sales 500 300
Add target ending finished goods inventory 35 15
Total required units 535 315
Deduct beginning finished goods inventory 15 30
Units of finished goods to be produced 520 285
3a.
Cost Budget
Available from beginning direct materials inventory
(under a FIFO cost-flow assumption)
Plastic: 250 kg × $3.80/kg $ 950
Metal: 60 kg × $3/kg $ 180
To be purchased this period
Plastic: (3,790 – 250) kg $4/kg 14,160
Metal: (545 – 60) kg $3/kg __ ____ 1,455
Direct materials to be used this period $15,110 $ 1,635 $16,745
Cost Budget
Plastic: 3,920 kg $4 $15,680
Metal: 540 kg $3 ______ $ 1,620
Purchases $15,680 $ 1,620 $ 17,300
4.
Direct Manufacturing Labour Costs Budget
For the Month of April
Output Units
Produced DMLH Total Hourly Wage
(requirement 2) per Unit Hours Rate Total
Cat-allac 520 3 1,560 $10 $15,600
Dog-errific 285 5 1,425 10 14,250
Total $29,850
Budgeted machine setup costs = $100 per setup hour 72.25 hours
= $7,225
Processing Overhead
Budgeted machine-hours (MH)
= (10 MH per unit × 520 units) + (18 MH per unit × 285 units)
= 5,200 MH + 5,130 MH = 10,330 MH
Budgeted processing costs
= $5 per MH × 10,330 MH
= $51,650
Inspection Overhead
Budgeted inspection hours
= (0.5 26 batches) + (0.6 19 batches)
= 13 + 11.4 = 24.4 inspection hrs.
Budgeted inspection costs
= $16 per inspection hr. 24.4 inspection hours
= $390.40
Manufacturing Overhead Budget
For the Month of April
Machine setup costs $ 7,225
Processing costs 51,650
Inspection costs 390
Total costs $59,265
6.
Unit Costs of Ending Finished Goods Inventory
April 30
Product
Cat-allac Dog-errific
Cost per Input per Input per
Unit of Unit of Unit of
Input Output Total Output Total
Plastic $ 4 4 kg $ 16.00 6 kg $ 24.00
Metal 3 0.5 kg 1.50 1 kg 3.00
Direct manufacturing labour 10 3 hrs. 30.00 5 hrs. 50.00
Machine setup 100 0.075 hrs. 1 7.50 0.1167 hr1 11.67
Processing 5 10 MH 50.00 18 MH 90.00
Inspection 16 0.025 hr2 0.40 0.04 hr.2 0.64
Total $105.40 $179.31
1 39 setup hours ÷ 520 units = 0.075 hours per unit; 33.25 setup hours ÷ 285 units = 0.1167 hours
per unit
2 13 inspection hours ÷ 520 units = 0.025 hours per unit; 11.4 inspection hours ÷ 285 units = 0.04
Finished goods
Cat-allac 35 $105.40 $3,689
Dog-errific 15 179.31 2,690 6,379
Total ending inventory $8,064
7.
Cost of Goods Sold Budget
For the Month of April
Beginning finished goods inventory, April, 1 ($1,500 + $5,580) $ 7,080
Direct materials used (requirement 3) $16,745
Direct manufacturing labour (requirement 4) 29,850
Manufacturing overhead (requirement 5) 59,265
Cost of goods manufactured 105,860
Cost of goods available for sale 112,940
Deduct: Ending finished goods inventory, April 30 (reqmt. 6) 6,379
Cost of goods sold $106,561
8.
Nonmanufacturing Costs Budget
For the Month of April
Salaries ($36,000 ÷ 2 1.05) $18,900
Other fixed costs ($36,000 ÷ 2) 18,000
Sales commissions ($155,000 1%) 1,550
Total nonmanufacturing costs $38,450
9.
Budgeted Operating Income Statement
For the Month of April
Revenue $155,000
Cost of goods sold 106,561
Gross margin 48,439
Operating (nonmanufacturing) costs 38,450
Operating income $ 9,989
Cash Budget
April 30
Cash balance, April 1 $ 5,360
Add receipts
Cash sales ($155,000 × 10%) 15,500
Credit card sales ($155,000 × 90% × 97%) 135,315
Total cash available for needs (x) $156,175
Deduct cash disbursements
Direct materials ($8,500 + ($17,300 × 50%)) $ 17,150
Direct manufacturing labour 29,850
Manufacturing overhead ($59,265 – $20,000 depreciation) 39,265
Nonmanufacturing salaries 18,900
Sales commissions 1,550
Other nonmanufacturing fixed costs ($18,000 – $10,000 deprn) 8,000
Machinery purchase 13,700
Income taxes 5,000
Total disbursements (y) $133,415
Financing
Repayment of loan $ 2,000
1 20
Interest at 12% ($2,000 12% )
12
Total effects of financing (z) $ 2,020
Ending cash balance, April 30 (x) ─ (y) ─ (z) $ 20,740
The time lost in the plant should be charged to the purchasing department.
Certainly, the plant manager could not be asked to underwrite a loss which is due
to failure of delivery over which he had no supervision. Although the purchasing
agent may feel that he has done everything he possibly could, he must realize that,
in the whole organization, he is the one who is in the best position to evaluate the
situation. He receives an assignment. He may accept it or reject it. But if he accepts,
he must perform. If he fails, the damage is evaluated. Everybody makes mistakes.
The important point is to avoid making too many mistakes and also to understand
fully that the extensive control reflected in “responsibility accounting” is the
necessary balance to the great freedom of action that individual executives are
given.
Discussions of this problem have again and again revealed a tendency among
students (and among accountants and managers) to “fix the blame”—as if the variances
arising from a responsibility accounting system should pinpoint misbehaviour and provide
answers. The point is that no accounting system or variances can provide answers.
However, variances can lead to questions. In this case, in deciding where the
penalty should be assigned, the student might inquire who should be asked—not who
should be blamed.
Classroom discussions have also raised the following diverse points:
(a) Is the railway company liable? Yes, and they have liability insurance.
(b) Costs of idle time are usually routinely charged to the production
department. Should the information system be fine-tuned to reallocate such
costs to the purchasing department? Both purchasing and the plant
manager answer to either a business manager or an operations manager.
The buck stops here. Some companies have the purchasing department
answer directly to the plant manager, which would be a probable result of
the above mistake. Give accountability to the plant manager as his/her
authority warrants it.
(c) How will the purchasing managers behave in the future regarding
willingness to take risks?
The text emphasizes the following: Beware of overemphasis on
controllability. For example, a time-honoured theme of management is that
responsibility should not be given without accompanying authority. Such a guide
is a useful first step, but responsibility accounting is more far-reaching. The basic
focus should be on information or knowledge, not on control. The key question is:
“Who is the best informed?” Put another way, “Who is the person who can tell us
the most about the specific item, regardless of ability to exert personal control?”
1. The standards proposed by Maki are not challenging. In fact, she set the target at
the level her department currently achieves.
2. Maki probably chose these standards so that her department would be able to
make the goal and receive any resulting reward. With a little effort, her
department can likely beat these goals.
Snowboards
Budgeted unit sales (Schedule 1) 1,200
Add target ending finished goods inventory 200
Total requirements 1,400
Deduct beginning finished goods inventory 100
Units to be produced 1,300
6.
$132,600
Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate: = $20.40 per DML hour
6,500
7.
Budgeted manufacturing overhead cost $132,600
= $102.00 per output unit
per output unit: 1,300
Note that the lost contribution margin of $1,200 is rarely accounted for in ordinary
accounting systems. If measured at all, it would appear as an underachieved budgeted
contribution margin; that is, actual would be less than budgeted by $1,200. The essence of
this case is to demonstrate the limitations of responsibility accounting and the futility of a
“blame-setting” theme in implementing responsibility accounting.
The responsibility lies with the authority, the city manager. She was not specific in
delegating responsibility. If her authority is required to break a stalemate, then her people
must know to take the stalemate to her. The repair shop manager was negligent in not
doing this.
The theory of responsibility accounting is straightforward—link each cost
ultimately to one person in the organization who has the most day-to-day influence over
its total amount. Repair and maintenance costs provide one of the most difficult
illustrations of implementing the theory. The total cost of the repair job, by itself, is the
responsibility of the repair shop manager. The manager has the most influence over the
total amount incurred at the instant of repair. However, in the eyes of many observers,
the department is only an intermediate cost objective because it services other
departments.
Most students will probably maintain that the utility department should bear the
$3,120 cost because its failure to maintain specified clearances led to this incident. Some
students will feel that the sanitation department should bear the extra costs above the
$2,400 original proposal.
Decisions regarding these disputes are inherently contextual, so students should
be properly uneasy about choosing a course of action for the controller. The controller has
dealt with all parties before and will interact with them again and again, so he must
measure the effects of his present decision against a whole series of decisions about the
running of the control system. The key is to prevent a similar occurrence in this or other
areas.
Given these precautions, the controller might avoid the issue of “fixing blame” by
not charging any department (or by charging the controller’s department). All the
managers seem to have partial responsibility. It would be reasonable to split the $3,120
cost between them evenly to avoid singling one manager out from the others, yet still
penalize each one for making an error. The lost $1,200 revenue need not be split. The
controller should learn from this incident and take action to:
Cost Budget
Available from beginning direct materials inventory
(under a FIFO cost-flow assumption) $ 64 $ 105
To be purchased this period
Sugar: (1,690 lbs. – 125 lbs.) × $0.50 per lb. 783
Sticks: (4,930 – 350) × $0.30 per stick ____ 1,374
Direct materials to be used this period $847 $1,479 $2,326
Cost Budget
Sugar: (1,805 lbs. × $0.50 per lb.) $903
Sticks: (5,060 × $0.30 per stick) ____ $1,518
Total $903 $1,518 $2,421
1d.
Direct Manufacturing Labour Costs Budget
For the Month of June
Output Units Direct Manufacturing Total Hourly Wage Total
Produced Labour-Hours per Unit Hours Rate
Large 3,100 0.20 620 $8 $4,960
Giant 1,830 0.25 457.5 8 3,660
Total 1,077.5 $8,620
1e.
Manufacturing Overhead Costs Budget
For the Month of June
Total
Machine setup
(Large 310 batchesa 0.08 hrs./batch + Giant 183 batchesb 0.09
hrs./batch) $20/hour $ 825
Processing (1,077.5 DMLH $1.70) 1,832
Total $2,657
1f.
Unit Costs of Ending Finished Goods Inventory
For the Month of June
Large Giant
Cost per Input per Input per
Unit of Input Unit of Output Total Unit of Output Total
Sugar $ 0.50 0.25 lb $0.125 0.50 lb. $ 0.25
Sticks 0.30 1 0.30 1 0.30
Direct manufacturing
labour 8.00 0.2 hr. 1.60 0.25 hr. 2.00
Machine setup 20.00 0.008 hr.a 0.16 0.009 hra 0.18
Processing 1.70 0.2 hr 0.34 0.25 hr 0.425
Total $2.525 $3.155
a0.08 hour per setup ÷ 10 units per batch = 0.008 hr. per unit;
0.09 hour per setup ÷ 10 units per batch = 0.009 hr. per unit.
Finished goods
Large 300 $2.525 $757
Giant 180 3.155 568 1,325
Total ending inventory $1,589
1g.
Cost of Goods Sold Budget
For the Month of June
Beginning finished goods inventory, June 1 ($500 + $474) $ 974
Direct materials used (requirement c) $2,326
Direct manufacturing labour (requirement d) 8,620
Manufacturing overhead (requirement e) 2,657
Cost of goods manufactured 13,603
Cost of goods available for sale 14,577
Deduct ending finished goods inventory, June 30 (requirement f) 1,325
Cost of goods sold $13,252
1h.
Nonmanufacturing Costs Budget
For the Month of June
Total
Marketing and general administration
10% 16,200 $1,620
2.
Cash Budget
June 30
Cash balance, June 30 $ 587
Add receipts
Collections from May accounts receivable 4,704
Collections from June accounts receivable
($16,200 80% 50%) 6,480
Collections from June cash sales
($16,200 20%) 3,240
Total collection from customers 14,424
Total cash available for needs (x) $15,011
Deduct cash disbursements
Direct material purchases in May $ 696
Direct material purchases in June
( $2,421 70%) 1,695
Direct manufacturing labour 8,620
Manufacturing overhead
( $2,657 60% because 40% is depreciation) 1,594
Nonmanufacturing costs
( $1,620 70% because 30% is depreciation) 1,134
Taxes 500
Total disbursements (y) $14,239
Financing
Interest at 12% ($20,000 12% 1 ÷ 12) (z) $ 200
Ending cash balance, June 30 (x) ─ (y) ─ (z) $ 572
3.
Budgeted Operating Income Statement
For the Month of June
Revenue $16,200
Cost of goods sold 13,252
Gross margin 2,948
Operating (nonmanufacturing) costs $1,620
Bad debt expense ($16,200 80% 1%) 130
Interest expense (for June) 200 1,950
Net income $ 998
Assets
Cash $ 572
Accounts receivable ($16,200 80% 50%) $ 6,480
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts 130 6,350
Inventories
Direct materials $ 264
Finished goods 1,325 1,589
This exercise illustrates the difficulty of budgeting issues in universities. There are
multiple stakeholders—student-athletes, student non-athletes, coaches, sports
administrators, university faculty, university administrators, and alumni. Actions that
benefit one type of stakeholder can “gore the ox” of other stakeholders.
The general options that groups could examine are outlined below.
Increasing Revenue
There are at least two approaches to “increase” revenue:
(a) Increase revenue from outside sources. For example, sell more tickets to football,
basketball, etc. This is heavily driven by success. Medley’s concerns about academic
standards likely will constrain Tax’s flexibility to recruit any athlete he believes to be
a major star.
Some universities have been innovative in terms of increasing cable television
revenue from coverage of university sporting games.
Tax could propose direct fundraising for the athletics department. This could
run into problems with Medley, as she may require all fundraising to be coordinated
at the university level.
(b) Increase the “revenue” attributed to the athletics department. Tax could argue that a
successful athletics program has many positive externalities for Maritime University,
many of which increase MU revenue.
• Alumni are more likely to give money and other contributions when they are
stimulated by being on campus to watch a nationally ranked team or viewing a
successful MU team on television. Many universities use tickets to athletic events
and invitations to related social functions as a thank-you to major donors.
• Athletics officials (especially nationally prominent coaches) are expected to assist
Medley and her senior officers in promoting MU to potential donors, parents of
future students, etc. For example, the coach of a number-one-ranked football
team may attend over 50 dinners/functions a year on behalf of the university.
Some of these dinners are “one-on-one” with potential large donors.
• Merchandising revenue sold to alumni and other supporters is likely to increase
when MU’s athletics teams achieve national success. These include sweaters,
towels, and rings.
The current budgeting process gives zero recognition to these externalities, which may
well exceed the projected $3.612 million deficit.
Decreasing Costs
Tax can always cut costs to meet any level Medley may impose. However, the ways to
achieve any substantial reduction will be relatively painful.
(a) Reduce scholarships (either number or amount) to students. This can take time to
achieve bottom-line reductions as existing students may have three more years of
scholarship remaining. Unless Tax cuts existing scholarships, he is restricted to
cutting back on scholarships to new students. This option will be very painful. One
consequence will be lower-quality levels of student athletes which will have
implications for the sporting competitiveness of MU. The option of cutting back on
already committed existing scholarships would be traumatic (but it has occurred).
Tax could undertake across-the-board cuts or target the reductions to some
sports. For example, sports that do not draw sizable crowds may be candidates for
reduction. One difficulty here is that Tax is faced with both reducing total costs and
increasing the relative percentage of scholarships to women. The scholarship
breakdown is:
Men’s Women’s
Program Program Total
Football 37 — 37
Basketball 21 11 32
Swimming 6 4 10
Other 4 2 6
Total 68 17 85
The largest percentage of scholarships are for the two highly successful programs—
men’s football (37/85 = 44%) and men’s basketball (21/85 = 25%). There is little room
for cutbacks in the second tier sports at MU.
(b) Reduce sports sponsored by the athletics department. Cut out support for all but a
few targeted sporting programs. This will cause morale problems for students in
these sporting programs (such as rugby, soccer, and volleyball).
(c) Reduce salaries and other costs of the athletics department. The salary for Bill
Madden is an obvious target for Tax’s cost reduction. However, Madden may have a
multi-year contract that leaves MU little room for cost reduction. Moreover, if cost
reduction is attempted, Madden may leave, which could have negative general
effects on morale and university finances. Tax could approach alumni or sponsors to
cover Madden’s salary and other costs. This would address Medley’s budget balance
concerns but not her concern as to the level of Madden’s salary relative to leading
academics’.
Cost reductions could be achieved by reducing the number of assistant coaches and the
number of support officials. The effect of these reductions on student morale and MU
athletic achievements is difficult to measure.
Gender Issues
Based on dollar expenditures and scholarships, Medley has evidence to support her
concerns. The men’s programs get the “lion’s share” of the expenditures and student
scholarships.
Men’s Women’s
Program Program
Costs $13.248 million $3.36 million
Full student scholarships 68 17
Tax could respond by noting that the men’s programs have a lower deficit based on
revenue minus assigned costs (in millions):
Men’s Women’s
Program Program
Revenue $12.420 $ 0.936
Assigned costs 13.248 3.360
Contribution $(0.828) $(2.424)
This lower deficit reflects, in part, the large revenue-drawing capacity of their successful
men’s football and athletics departments.
Medley’s demands for a balanced budget, more gender equality, and higher
academic standards leaves Tax in an unenviable position.