REFERENCES

REFERENCES

1. Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Tata McGraw-
Hill, 4th Edition 2005.

2. Tchobanoglous George and Angelakis Andreas N., Technologies for wastewater

treatment appropriate for reuse: Potential for applications in Greece, Water Science
Technology, Vol. 33, No. 10-11, 1996, pp.15-24.

3. Wilderer P. A. and Schreff D., Decentralized and centralized wastewater

management: a challenge for technology developers, Water Science and
Technology, Vol. 41 No. 1, 2000, pp. 1–8.

4. Capodaglio A. G., Callegari A., Cecconet D. and Molognoni D., Sustainability of

decentralized wastewater treatment technologies, Water Practice and Technology,
Vol. 12 No. 2, 2017, pp. 463-477.

5. Odegaard H., Rusten B. and Westrum T., Small wastewater treatment plants based
on moving bed biofilm reactors, Water Science Technology, Vol. 28, No. 10,
1993, pp. 351-359.

6. Odegaard H., Rusten B. and Westrum T., A new moving bed biofilm reactor-
applications and results, Water Science Technology, Vol. 29, No. 10-11, 1994, pp.
157-165.

7. Aygun Ahmet, Nas Bilgehan, Berktay Ali and Ates Havva, Application of
sequencing batch biofilm reactor for treatment of sewage wastewater treatment:
effect of power failure, Desalination and Water Treatment, Vol. 52, 2013, pp.
6956-6965.

8. Odegaard H., The moving bed biofilm reactor, Water Environmental Engineering
and Reuse of Water, Hokkiado Press, 1999, pp. 250-305.

9. Odegaard H., Gisvold B. and Strickland J., The influence of carrier size and shape
in the moving bed biofilm process, Water Science Technology, Vol. 41, No. 4-5,
2000, pp. 383–392.

10. Odegaard H., Innovations in wastewater treatment: the moving bed biofilm
process, Water Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 9, 2006, pp. 17–33.

11. Keller J., Watts S., Battye-Smith W. and Chong R., Full-scale demonstration of
biological nutrient removal in a single tank SBR process, Water Science and
Technology, Vol. 43 No. 3, 2001, pp. 355–362.
101
12. Irvine R. L., Ketchum L. H., Breyfogle R., Barth E. F., Municipal Application of
Sequencing Batch Treatment, Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 55, No. 5,
1983, pp. 484-488.

13. Sirianuntapiboon S. and Yommee S., Application of a new type of moving bio-
film in aerobic sequencing batch reactor (aerobic-SBR), Journal of Environmental
Management, Vol. 78, 2005, pp. 149–156.

14. Prendergast J., Rodgers M., and Healy M. G., The efficiency of a sequencing batch
biofilm reactor in organic carbon and phosphorus removal, Journal of
Environmental Science and Health, Vol. 40, 2005, pp. 1619–1626.

15. Sombatsompop K., Songpim A., Reabroi S. and Inkong-ngam P., A comparative
study of sequencing batch reactor and moving bed sequencing batch reactor for
piggery wastewater treatment, Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technology, Vol. 5, No. 02, 2011,
pp.191-203.

16. Rusten B., Kolkinn Odd and Odegaard H., Moving bed biofilm reactors chemical
precipitation for high efficiency treatment of wastewater from small communities,
Water Sci Technology, Vol. 35, No. 6, 1997, pp. 71-79.

17. Andreottola G., Foladori P. and Ragazzi M., Upgrading of a small wastewater
treatment plant in a cold climate region using a moving bed biofilm reactor
(MBBR) system, Water Science Technology, Vol. 41, 2000, pp.177–185.

18. Orantes J. C. and Gonzalez-Martinez S., A new low-cost biofilm carrier for the
treatment of municipal wastewater in a moving bed reactor, Water Science
Technology, Vol. 48 No. 11-12, 2003, pp. 243–250.

19. Daude D. and Stephenson T., Moving bed biofilm reactors: a small-scale treatment
solution, Water Science and Technology, Vol. 48 No. 11–12, 2003, pp. 251–257.

20. Trapani D. Di, Mannina G., Torregrossa M. and Viviani G., Hybrid moving bed
biofilm reactors: a pilot plant experiment, Water Science Technology, Vol. 57, No.
10, 2008, pp. 1539–1546.

21. Ahmadi Mehdi, Izanloo Hassan, Mehr alian Aliakbar, Amiri Hoda and Noori
Sepehr Mohammad, Upgrading of Kish Island Markazi wastewater treatment plant
by MBBR, Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, Vol. 01, No. 4, 2011, pp.
243-249.

102
22. Lopez-Lopez C., Martín-Pascual J., Gonzalez-Martínez A., Calderon K.,
Gonzalez-Lopez J., Hontoria E. and Poyatos J. M., Influence of filling ratio and
carrier type on organic matter removal in a moving bed biofilm reactor with
pretreatment of electrocoagulation in wastewater treatment, Journal of
Environmental Science and Health, Part A 47, 2012, pp. 1759–1767.

23. Martín-Pascual J., Lopez-Lopez C., Cerda A., Gonzalez-Lopez J., Hontoria E. and
Poyatos J. M., Comparative kinetic study of carrier type in a moving bed system
applied to organic matter removal in urban wastewater treatment, Water Air Soil
Pollution, Vol. 223, 2012, pp.1699–1712.

24. Azizi Shohreh, Valipour Alireza and Sithebe Thami, Evaluation of Different
Wastewater Treatment Processes and Development of a Modified Attached
Growth Bioreactor as a Decentralized Approach for Small Communities, The
Scientific World Journal, Vol. 2013, 2013, pp. 1-8.

25. Javid A.H., Hassani A. H., Ghanbari B.,and Yaghmaeian K., Feasibility of utilizing
moving bed biofilm reactor to upgrade and retrofit municipal wastewater treatment
plants, Int. J. Environ. Res., 7.4, 2013, pp. 963-972.

26. Wang Rong-Chang, Wen Xiang-Hua, Qian Yi, Influence of carrier concentration
on the performance and microbial characteristics of a suspended carrier biofilm
reactor, Process Biochemistry, Vol. 40, 2005, pp. 2992–3001.

27. Aygun Ahmet, Nas Bilgehan and Berktay Ali, Influence of High organic loading
rates on COD removal and sludge production in moving bed biofilm reactor,
Environmental Engineering Science, Vol. 25, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1311-1316.

28. Piculell Maria, Welander Thomas and Jonsson Karin, Organic removal activity in
biofilm and suspended biomass fractions of MBBR systems, Water Science and
Technology, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2014, pp. 55-61.

29. Vyrides Ioannis, Drakou Efi-Maria, Ioannou Stavros, Michael Fotoula, Gatidou
Georgia, and Stasinakis Athanasios S., Biodegradation of bilge water: Batch test
under anaerobic and aerobic conditions and performance of three pilot aerobic
Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBRs) at different filling fractions, Journal of
Environmental Management, Vol. 217, 2018, pp. 356-362.

30. Bering Sławomira, Mazur Jacek, Tarnowski Krzysztof, Janus Magdalena, Mozia
Sylwia, Morawski Antoni Waldemar, The application of moving bed bio-reactor

103
 (MBBR) in commercial laundry wastewater treatment, Science of the Total
Environment, Vol. 627, 2018, pp. 1638-1643.

31. Ketchum L. H. Jr., Irvine R. L., Breyfogle R. E., Manning J. F. Jr., “A comparison
of biological and chemical phosphorus removals in continuous and sequencing
batch reactors”, J. Water Poll. Control Fed., Vol. 59, 1987, pp. 13-18.

32. Norcross K. L., Sequencing Batch Reactors – An Overview, Water Science

Technology, Vol. 26, No. 9-11, 1992, pp. 2523-2526.

33. Chang Hao H. and Hao Oliver J., Sequencing Batch Reactor System for Nutrient
Removal: ORP and pH Profiles, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnology, Vol. 67, 1996, pp.
27-38.

34. Debik Eyup and Manav Neslihan, “Sequence optimization in a sequencing batch
reactor for biological nutrient removal from domestic wastewater”, Bioprocess
Biosyst Eng, Vol. 33, 2010 pp. 533–540.

35. Ketchum Lloyd H., Jr., Design and physical features of sequencing batch reactors,
Water Science Tech. Vol. 35. No. 1, 1997, pp. 11-18.

36. Jucherskia Andrzej, Walczowskia Andrzej, Bugajskib Piotr, JoYwiakowskic

Krzysztof, Technological reliability of domestic wastewater purification in a small
Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor (SBBR), Separation and Purification
Technology, Vol. 224, 2019, pp. 340-347.

37. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
American Public Health Association/ American Water Works Association/Water
Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA, 20th edition, 2005.

38. IS 3025 (Part 44): Method of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for Water
and Wastewater, Part 44: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) (First Revision),
1993.

39. Faridnasr, M., Ghanbari, B., Sassani, A., Optimization of the Moving-bed Biofilm
Sequencing Batch Reactor (MBSBR) to control aeration time by kinetic
computational modeling: simulated sugar industry wastewater treatment,
Bioresource Technology, Vol. 208, 2016, pp. 149-160.

40. Hassani, A. H., Borghei, S. M., Samadyar, H., and Ghanbari, B., Utilization of
moving bed biofilm reactor for industrial wastewater treatment containing ethylene

104
 glycol: kinetic and performance study, Environmental technology, Vol. 35(4),
2014, pp. 499-507.

41. Weiss Jeffery S., Alvarez Marcos, Tang Chi-Chung, Horvath Robert W., and Stahl
James F., Evaluation of moving bed biofilm reactor technology for enhancing
nitrogen removal in a stabilization pond treatment plant, Water Environ Fed
(Weftec), 14, 2005, pp. 2085–2102.

42. Trapani D D, Mannina G, Torregrossa M and Viviani G, Hybrid moving bed

biofilm reactors: a pilot plant experiment, Water Science Technology, Vol. 57,
2008, pp. 1539–1546.

105
ANNEXURE
 ANNEXURE
(Experimental data on MBSBR used for kinetic modelling)
Influent COD (S0 mg/L) and Effluent COD (S mg/L) values for various carrier fill percent and aeration time

S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S
70% carrier fill 60% carrier fill 50% carrier fill 45% carrier fill 40% carrier fill 35% carrier fill 30% carrier fill 25% carrier fill 20% carrier fill
1.0 h aeration
112.00 48.00 144.00 60.00 152.00 52.00 148.00 52.00 144.00 56.00 144.00 52.00 144.00 48.00 144.00 52.00 144.00 56.00
116.00 52.00 152.00 68.00 160.00 64.00 156.00 52.00 148.00 56.00 148.00 56.00 148.00 52.00 152.00 56.00 152.00 60.00
136.00 72.00 164.00 72.00 164.00 56.00 160.00 56.00 152.00 64.00 152.00 60.00 152.00 60.00 164.00 60.00 164.00 64.00
140.00 68.00 168.00 72.00 168.00 64.00 168.00 56.00 164.00 60.00 164.00 60.00 164.00 56.00 168.00 64.00 168.00 68.00
160.00 68.00 176.00 80.00 172.00 60.00 180.00 64.00 184.00 64.00 184.00 64.00 184.00 60.00 176.00 68.00 176.00 72.00
1.5 h aeration
128.00 64.00 144.00 52.00 144.00 40.00 144.00 40.00 144.00 48.00 144.00 44.00 144.00 40.00 144.00 44.00 144.00 48.00
144.00 68.00 152.00 60.00 148.00 48.00 152.00 40.00 148.00 52.00 148.00 52.00 148.00 48.00 152.00 48.00 152.00 52.00
148.00 60.00 164.00 64.00 152.00 44.00 160.00 52.00 152.00 56.00 152.00 52.00 152.00 52.00 164.00 52.00 164.00 56.00
160.00 68.00 168.00 64.00 164.00 52.00 168.00 44.00 164.00 56.00 164.00 56.00 164.00 48.00 168.00 56.00 168.00 60.00
168.00 80.00 176.00 72.00 184.00 68.00 184.00 48.00 184.00 60.00 184.00 60.00 184.00 52.00 176.00 60.00 176.00 64.00
2.0 h aeration
112.00 40.00 144.00 44.00 152.00 44.00 148.00 40.00 144.00 40.00 144.00 36.00 144.00 32.00 144.00 36.00 144.00 40.00
116.00 48.00 152.00 52.00 160.00 52.00 156.00 44.00 148.00 44.00 148.00 48.00 148.00 40.00 152.00 40.00 152.00 44.00
136.00 52.00 164.00 56.00 164.00 44.00 160.00 48.00 152.00 48.00 152.00 44.00 152.00 40.00 164.00 44.00 164.00 52.00
140.00 60.00 168.00 56.00 168.00 56.00 168.00 40.00 164.00 48.00 164.00 44.00 164.00 40.00 168.00 48.00 168.00 52.00
160.00 48.00 176.00 64.00 172.00 52.00 180.00 52.00 184.00 52.00 184.00 52.00 184.00 44.00 176.00 52.00 176.00 56.00
2.5 h aeration
128.00 52.00 144.00 40.00 144.00 32.00 144.00 32.00 144.00 32.00 144.00 28.00 144.00 28.00 144.00 32.00 144.00 36.00
144.00 56.00 152.00 40.00 148.00 36.00 152.00 28.00 148.00 40.00 148.00 40.00 148.00 36.00 152.00 36.00 152.00 40.00
148.00 44.00 164.00 48.00 152.00 36.00 160.00 44.00 152.00 40.00 152.00 40.00 152.00 36.00 164.00 40.00 164.00 48.00
160.00 48.00 168.00 48.00 164.00 40.00 168.00 36.00 164.00 40.00 164.00 36.00 164.00 36.00 168.00 40.00 168.00 44.00
168.00 44.00 176.00 56.00 184.00 48.00 184.00 36.00 184.00 44.00 184.00 48.00 184.00 40.00 176.00 44.00 176.00 52.00
3.0 h aeration
112.00 16.00 144.00 36.00 152.00 28.00 148.00 32.00 144.00 28.00 144.00 24.00 144.00 24.00 144.00 28.00 144.00 32.00
116.00 24.00 152.00 36.00 160.00 36.00 156.00 32.00 148.00 32.00 148.00 36.00 148.00 28.00 152.00 32.00 152.00 36.00
136.00 48.00 164.00 44.00 164.00 36.00 160.00 36.00 152.00 32.00 152.00 28.00 152.00 28.00 164.00 36.00 164.00 40.00
140.00 20.00 168.00 40.00 168.00 40.00 168.00 32.00 164.00 36.00 164.00 32.00 164.00 28.00 168.00 32.00 168.00 36.00
160.00 44.00 176.00 44.00 172.00 40.00 180.00 40.00 184.00 32.00 184.00 40.00 184.00 36.00 176.00 36.00 176.00 44.00
3.5 h aeration
128.00 24.00 144.00 32.00 144.00 28.00 144.00 24.00 144.00 24.00 144.00 20.00 144.00 20.00 144.00 24.00 144.00 28.00
144.00 28.00 152.00 32.00 148.00 28.00 152.00 20.00 148.00 24.00 148.00 28.00 148.00 20.00 152.00 28.00 152.00 32.00
148.00 28.00 164.00 36.00 152.00 28.00 160.00 28.00 152.00 28.00 152.00 24.00 152.00 24.00 164.00 32.00 164.00 32.00
160.00 32.00 168.00 36.00 164.00 32.00 168.00 28.00 164.00 28.00 164.00 28.00 164.00 24.00 168.00 28.00 168.00 32.00
168.00 40.00 176.00 36.00 184.00 36.00 184.00 28.00 184.00 28.00 184.00 36.00 184.00 32.00 176.00 32.00 176.00 36.00

106
 S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S S0 S
70% carrier fill 60% carrier fill 50% carrier fill 45% carrier fill 40% carrier fill 35% carrier fill 30% carrier fill 25% carrier fill 20% carrier fill
4.0 h aeration
112.00 12.00 144.00 28.00 152.00 20.00 148.00 20.00 144.00 22.00 144.00 16.00 144.00 16.00 144.00 20.00 144.00 24.00
116.00 16.00 152.00 28.00 160.00 20.00 156.00 20.00 148.00 20.00 148.00 20.00 148.00 16.00 152.00 24.00 152.00 28.00
136.00 36.00 164.00 32.00 164.00 20.00 160.00 20.00 152.00 24.00 152.00 20.00 152.00 20.00 164.00 28.00 164.00 28.00
140.00 16.00 168.00 32.00 168.00 24.00 168.00 24.00 164.00 24.00 164.00 24.00 164.00 20.00 168.00 24.00 168.00 28.00
160.00 20.00 176.00 32.00 172.00 24.00 180.00 24.00 184.00 24.00 184.00 28.00 184.00 24.00 176.00 28.00 176.00 32.00

107
PUBLICATIONS
 PUBLICATIONS

1. Shaha Sunil S., Munavalli G. R. (2018), “Moving Bed Bioreactor for Sewage
Treatment: A Review”, IJRAR December 2018, Vol.5, No. 04, pp. 532-538.

2. Shaha Sunil S., Munavalli G. R., Joshi S. G. (2019), “Study on Domestic Wastewater
Treatment by Moving Bed Sequencing Batch Reactor”, VTU Journal of Engineering
Sciences and Management, Vol. 1, No: 2, pp. 71-79.

108
ACCEPTANCE LETTER – PLAGIARISM
CHECK
 Visvesvaraya Technological University
Jnana Sangama, Belagavi -590 018.
Prof.Salish Annigeri ph.D Phone: (0831) 2498136
Registrar aEvclluation) Fcix: (0831 ) 2405461

Ref.No. VIU|BGMIExam /2019-2012454 Date:

L-8 JAM Z020
Acceptance Letter

Sir/Madam,

The soft copy of Ph.D./M.Sc. (Engineering by research) thesis of Mr./Mrs.

Sunil Sumalilal Shaha bearing USN 5VX15PCJ23 has been submitted for Anti-

plagiarism check at the office of the undersigned through ``Turn-it-in" package.

The scan has been carried out and the scanned output reveals a match
percentage of 13% which is within the acceptable limit of 25%. To 6btain the
comprehensive report of the plagiarism test, research scholar can send a mail to
aDcenu.ac.in along with the USN, Name, Name of the Guide/Co-guide,
Research centre and title of the thesis.

fro-g~
Registrar (Evaluation)

®|.b`uf'~t

To, Sunil Sumalilal Shaha

Research Scholar

Environmental Engineering

VTU Research Resource Centre, Belgaum

Copy to: Dr.G.R.Munovalli ., Associate Professor,Dept of Civil Engineering, Walchand College

of Engineering Sangli -416415 Maharashtra.