Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Transport Economics, 3rd Edition All Chapter
Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Transport Economics, 3rd Edition All Chapter
Edition
Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-transport-economics-3rd-edition/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebooksecure.com/download/rotary-kilns-second-edition-
transport-phenomena-and-transport-processes-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/progress-in-heterocyclic-
chemistry-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-translational-medicine-
in-cns-drug-development-volume-29/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-business-economics-3rd-
edition/
(eBook PDF) International Economics 3rd Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-international-
economics-3rd-edition/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/managerial-economics-ebook-
pdf-2/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-multimodal-transport-
law-by-michiel-spanjaart/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/mass-transport-in-magmatic-
systems-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-economics-3rd-edition-
by-dean-karlan/
Transport Economics, 3rd Edition
viii TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, 3RD EDITION
Index 499
Preface
Publishers are always pressing for new editions of books, and particularly text-
books. This is logical, after all they are commercial enterprises, and new editions
of a book make the old ones redundant and the used books, collectors’ items. The
more editions they publish, the larger the sales checks. Authors get paid royalties
and are often enthusiastic collaborators. In practice, however, one should never
rush into writing a new edition; there should be motivation besides money.
A new textbook becomes important when the old one becomes outdated.
In subject areas such as economics, much of the basic theory is well established,
although not always liked or accepted, by policy makers; perhaps this unpopu-
larity is not surprising, after all Thomas Carlyle did call economics ‘The dismal
science’ some two centuries ago. There are, however, movements forward in
our basic understanding of the economics, including that which is particularly
germane to transport matters. There are also developments in the techniques
available for estimating the effects of transport on society, and conversely on the
way social change impacts on transport. This, combined with a continual accu-
mulation of data over time, and the ability to mine previous studies to look at
time trend affects or, in exceptional cases, adds to our knowledge.
There are also continual shifts in the way that policy makers treat transport;
the political economy of the subject. Just consulting daily newspapers clearly
shows the importance of transport in public perception. Transport issues of all
kinds fill the column inches of these publications, as does the time spent on trans-
port and travel in television news programs and documentaries. This public inter-
est inevitably draws the attention of policy makers sensitive to the perceptions of
their constituents.
Since the last edition of the book, some 14 years ago, quite a lot has changed.
Our understanding of the factors influencing demand for transport services has
moved forward, and our approaches to modeling and estimating the ways in
which a variety of factors influence the use of transport has evolved. Challenges
that were pertinent in the early 1990s remain but many, such as global warming
emissions and concerns over terrorism, have grown in importance. International
transport is now more important, as globalization has grown, driven in part
by institutional changes, but also facilitated by developments in such things
as information technology. The role of logistics, which has a major economics
component, has grown as trade has expanded.
Of course, not all things have changed. The basic economic principles of
supply and demand remain as valid as ever; it is the context and focus that has
changed. Nevertheless, more up-to-date examples make their understanding
easier; context helps the assimilation of ideas. Equally the scale and details of
x TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, 3RD EDITION
the transport system have inevitably responded to internal and external factors
over nearly a decade and a half, and it is time to update the factual background
against which transport economics is set, even if it does not materially affect the
underlying theories.
So this new edition takes on board these important changes. But it also has a
different physical form. It is longer. This is because the original edition was aimed
mainly, although far from completely, at the UK market where universities nor-
mally had a 10-week term. There was basically a chapter per class. Changes have
taken place in the educational world, and the earlier edition seems to have found
a wider market than expected. This edition is thus longer, some 14 chapters and
more suited to a semester system. This is not just padding added to fill in students’
time; there is serious restructuring, redrafting of material seen in editions one and
two, and new material.
Additionally, the referencing is slightly different. The Harvard Manual, with
its author–date format, which forms the basis of most economics journal and
monograph referencing has been set aside for a simple Chicago approach. There
are no extensive lists of references but rather a few important citations are offered
together with a brief section of further reading at the conclusion of each chapter.
This is in response to comments from users of the earlier editions who found the
Harvard system distracting in what is essentially a textbook.
As before, the book is a mixture of prose, tables, figures and equations. The
aim is to help understanding rather than to overpower, or impress, the reader with
technique.
I hope that teachers, students and other readers find the new edition useful.
Kenneth Button
1 Transport and Economics
* The word ‘transport’ is used throughout this book rather than the US ‘transportation’
despite the use of American vocabulary elsewhere. This is to avoid confusion for British
readers, and it avoids obvious problems for Australians for whom the term ‘transporta-
tion’ has peculiar connotations.
1 K.J.W. Alexander, ‘Some economic problems of the transport industry’, Chartered
Institute of Transport Journal, 36, 306–8, 1975.
2 TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, 3RD EDITION
Most notable of these are the Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, which
first appeared in 1967, and the International Journal of Transport Economics.
Both of these date back to that general era, but so do journals such as the Journal
of Urban Economics and Regional Science and Urban Economics which also often
carry transport material. In addition, mode-specific journals have emerged, such
as Maritime Economics and Logistics, which focus on particular transport indus-
tries. But, nevertheless, compared to many areas of economic study, transport still
remains remarkably neglected.
This does not mean that there have not been periodic surges of interest in
some particular aspects of transport economics. Indeed, in the mid-1980s Clifford
Winston,2 when examining developments in transport economics, was able to
comment on ‘a current intensity [of interest in the field] not witnessed for more
than fifty years’. This surge was mainly related to the analysis of the impacts of
more liberal, or to use the American term, ‘deregulated’, transport markets that
were emerging. More recently, the role of transport as a facilitator of economic
growth has attracted attention both at the micro and at the macroeconomic levels.
Matters of transport security and the financing of transport networks have been
themes attracting attention in the early part of the twenty-first century, as has the
role of transport in international trade.
This relative lack of contemporary academic interest in transport economics
is surprising because transport problems have in the more distant past stimulated
major developments in economic theory (including the development of the notion
of consumer surplus by French economists/engineers, such as Jules Dupuit, in the
1840s; the refinement of cost allocation models by such famed US economists
such as John Bates Clark and Frank Taussig in the early part of the last century;
and the examination of the marginal cost pricing principle to improve the charg-
ing of rail service and work on congestion and the environment by Arthur Pigou
in the 1920s).
More recently, the advent of computers has encouraged work on applied
econometrics (for example, the development of discrete choice models in con-
sumer theory by Dan McFadden, and refinements to flexible form cost functions)
and on mathematical programming (for example, the use of data envelopment
analysis to assess the relative efficiency of different suppliers) using transport case
studies as a basis for analysis. Nonetheless, transport economists in universities
are thin on the ground, and their numbers in businesses and government are not
much larger.
In part, the relatively small number of clearly identifiable specialist transport
economists may be attributed to the diverse nature of the industries involved in
their work which range from taxi-cabs to oil transportation, with their various
institutional and technical peculiarities. Non-economists – lawyers and engineers
– often have specialist knowledge of the industry and a limited background in
economics. At the applied level, numerous, small firms do not have the resources
Economics is not easy to define.3 Famously the Chicago economist Jacob Viner is
meant to have said, ‘economics is what economists do’; not exactly helpful to the
outside. But it is generally agreed that it is about human behavior and resource
allocation, and in particular about the allocation of scarce resources. It focuses a
lot on the role of markets in doing this, but not exclusively so. Various aspects of
it border on a variety of other disciplines such as law, sociology and engineering,
often making boundaries vague. It also may be essentially descriptive in the sense
of it approaching a value-neutral science – it tells us that in most conditions the
quantity demanded of something will fall if its price rises – but it can also contain
elements of prescription: it is a ‘good’ thing for social welfare for prices to be low.
The latter is often called ‘political economy’. All these elements, and some others,
become important when studying the economics of transport.
What has been called ‘Modern Transport Economics’ by Michael Thomson4
in his book of the same name, began slowly to take shape about 45 years ago. Up
until that time, as Rakowski5 points out, ‘the field had essentially been in a state
of semi-dormancy since the 1920s’, and while considerable institutional studies
had been conducted, very little analytical work as we would understand it today
had been attempted. Indeed, the two standard American textbooks on transport
economics into the late 1960s were D.F. Pregrum’s Transportation: Economics and
Public Policy, and Philip Locklin’s Economics of Transportation, which had only
five or so line drawings between them and no equations.
3 R.E. Backhouse and S.G. Medema, ‘On the definition of economics’, Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 23, 221–33, 2009.
4 J.M. Thomson, Modern Transport Economics, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975
5 J.P. Rakowski, Transport Economics: A Guide to Information Sources, Detroit: Gale
Research Co., 1976.
4 TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, 3RD EDITION
6 K.M. Gwilliam, ‘Review of “Transport Economics”’, Economic Journal, 90, 677–8, 1980.
TRANSPORT AND ECONOMICS 5
but places particular emphasis on the growing problems of urban transport in the
1960s and the recognition that land use and transport needed to be considered
together, and usually simultaneously, if the problems were to be tackled success-
fully. As a result of this, he argues, ‘the boundaries between transport economics
and urban and regional planning were obscured’.
While the broad underlying intellectual thrust of modern transport analysis
has not changed significantly since the 1970s and early 1970s, namely the use of
economic theory to enhance transport efficiency, in the broadest sense the topics
of focus have shifted to some extent and the economic tools used have been
improved and fine-tuned. The late 1970s saw particular concern in many parts
of the world with the macroeconomic problems associated with ‘Stagflation’: the
simultaneous occurrence of high levels of unemployment and poor economic
growth with inflation. The failure of a large part of the US railroad industry
may be seen as a catalyst for some of the particular changes in transport. The
adoption of Reaganomics in the United States, and Thatcherism in the United
Kingdom, involving similar approaches towards what became known as ‘supply-
side economics’, led to a honing-in on reducing costs in heavily regulated indus-
tries such as transport.
The empirical analysis of those such as Bill Jordan and Michael Levine pro-
vided evidence of excess costs associated with regulation, the theories of Baumol
and others on contestable market structures offered a new way of looking at
competitive forces, and Harold Demsetz’s work provided a basis for enhancing
the efficiency with which transport infrastructure is provided and maintained.
Work by a variety of Chicago economists, including George Stigler and Sam
Peltzman, began to focus on the motivations of those responsible for framing and
administrating economic regulatory regimes, arguing that they seldom served the
public interest. The outcome was what some have called the ‘Age of Regulatory
Reform’,7 which focused on removing distorting regulations and allowing greater
market flexibility.
More recently, public concern combined with academic curiosity has led to
economists switching more of their attention to matters pertaining to the envi-
ronmental implications of transport supply, the role that economics can play in
enhancing the transport logistics supply chain, and the financing of infrastruc-
ture. Transport, as we shall see later in the book, can impose considerable strains
on the environment and, although this has long been recognized, the scale and
nature of transport has changed, as has scientific knowledge on the implications
of these strains – and especially in the context of global impacts.
Equally, globalization, internationalization and domestic economic growth
within many countries have been, in part, the result of improved logistics, includ-
ing just-in-time supply chain management. Although often not appreciated, many
of these improvements in logistics are the result of the application of basic eco-
nomic principles. Finally, modern transport requires an extensive infrastructure
7 K.J. Button and D. Swann (eds), The Age of Regulatory Reform, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1989.
6 TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, 3RD EDITION
of roads, rail tracks, ports, air traffic control systems, bridges and so on. The
construction and the maintenance of this infrastructure have to be paid for.
While in the past transport economics has focused primarily on deciding which
elements to build or repair, the taxpayer bearing much of the financial burden,
there is now concern about the methods of finance to use and the overall amount
of national resources that have to be devoted to this type of infrastructure. This
issue is increasingly important in many developed economies as old infrastruc-
ture becomes obsolete or needs maintenance, but is perhaps more critical in
lower-income nations that lack many key transport networks.
When considering this background, it is important to emphasize that trans-
port economics is not distinct from all other branches of economics. Indeed,
many of the seminal papers on the subject have appeared in the general econom-
ics literature and have often been produced by individuals with a broad interest
in economics rather than transport specialists. Nevertheless, in most areas of
study, as our knowledge has increased, it has become difficult, if not impossible,
for economists to follow developments in all branches of their discipline; the
Renaissance man or woman of economics is in the past. There has been an inevi-
table increase in specialization. Transport economics has, in general terms, a long
history but, as Rakowski and others suggest, it was only in the 1970s or so that it
become a major field of academic study within universities and only subsequently
did a substantial body of specialists emerge. So the modern transport economist
is a relatively new beast. But what is it that he/she studies?
The scope of each of the subdisciplines within economics (for example, agricul-
tural economics, development economics and public sector economics) is deter-
mined not by particular schools or philosophies but rather by the type of subject
matter examined and the problems tackled. Transport economists are interested
in the economic problems of moving goods and people – they are not normally
so concerned with either the industries producing the vehicles and infrastructure
(aircraft manufacturing, road construction companies, ship building and so on)
or with some of the very wide implications of transport policy (for example, on
the balance of payments), although matters to do with the environment certainly
attract increasing amounts of their attention. Of course, this does not mean that
transport issues are viewed in complete isolation from their wider context, but it
does mean that the main emphasis and thrust of analysis is directed towards the
more immediate transport implications.
While much of the economic analysis of transport issues is at the micro level
(for example, looking at the decisions of individuals or firms) or at the meso level
(focusing on transport industries or the importance of transport or a specific
region) there is also some interest in the macroeconomic impacts of transport, for
example, on its effects on national productivity, globalization of trade, or labor
force migration.
TRANSPORT AND ECONOMICS 7
8 R.H. Coase, ‘The institutional structure of production’, American Economic Review, 82,
713–9, 1992.
9 O.E. Williamson, ‘The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead’,
Journal of Economics Literature, 38, 595–613, 2000.
8 TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, 3RD EDITION
Governance, especially
contracts: Transaction cost economics
1 to 10 years
Institutional environment,
Economics of property
formal rules:
rights/political economy
10 to 100 years
Embeddedness, customs
and traditions: Social theory
100 years or more
First, there was the demise of the Soviet Union and the move away from cen-
tralized planning, together with the gradual uptake of capitalism in China. These,
and similar developments elsewhere, represent major shifts in the embedded atti-
tude of these countries and with this have come new ways of thinking about the
role of transport in society and the ways in which it should be provided. Second,
there have been changing attitudes towards free trade, and with these have come
‘globalization’. The resultant approach to tariffs and other barriers to interna-
tional economic policies have had profound effects on shipping, air transport, and
many forms of surface transport. Going back to the global conflict of 1914–18,
the subsequent establishment of the League of Nations paved the way for this
in modern times, and it has extended since the end of the Second World War.
It is not just that such global institutions as the World Bank, the International
Maritime Organization, and the International Civil Aviation Organization exist,
but rather that there is now a belief that they have a durable role to play in society.
This forms a basis for new economic systems and an embedded global view on
how business can be conducted.
The institutional environment involves formal laws, regulations and rules,
and at a higher level, ‘constitutions’. It is also concerned with the instruments
of law – legislatures and bureaucracies – and mechanisms of enforcement. For
example, it relates to legal reforms such as the 1978 Airline Deregulation Act
which liberalized domestic aviation in the United States, or the Single European
Market Act in Europe in 1986 that led to a phased deregulation of transport
and other markets within Europe. But it also importantly includes the issue of
property rights and their enforcement. So-called ‘Pigouvian externalities’, such as
pollution, and ‘club good’ problems of traffic congestion, are the most obvious
areas of interest for transport economists in this regard. From an economics of
TRANSPORT AND ECONOMICS 9
transport perspective, the question becomes one of getting the rules right to meet
societal demands.
Governance, basically the way business is done, is important, and here the
economic emphasis is on notions of contracts. Strictly, it is about crafting order,
and thereby mitigates conflict and realizes mutual gains. There are many factors
– cultural, structural, cognitive and political – that influence the way in which
these formal and informal institutions develop. If we take shipping as a case
study, governance here may be seen as embodying such things as the evolving
structure of coordination of shipping activities that began with ‘conferences’ –
essentially cartels – in the 1970s and has developed through consortia into stra-
tegic alliances, whereby changes occur discretely rather than continuously. These,
like their brethren in the airline industry, can involve agreements on such things
as schedules and rates with flexibility about which vessels carry any particular
assignments.
There are also contractual issues within the larger integrated supply chains
that, for example, tie, to varying degrees, shipping with other elements in the
logistics system, most immediately ports but extending beyond this. Governance
is different from government in the sense that the former involves informal agree-
ments within a legal structure. As an example, the United States deregulated its
domestic airline industry by an Act of Congress, whereas the United Kingdom
essentially got the same result because the Civil Aviation Authority reinterpreted
the existing set of laws. Because of high transaction costs, the recent trend has
been for a considerable amount of contract management and dispute settlement
action to be dealt with directly by the parties involved – in other words, within
market frameworks rather than by legal actions.
Finally, there are the ongoing processes involving the day-to-day activities
that take place involving transport. This is essentially the traditional bread-and-
butter of micro- and mesoeconomic analysis taking into account the specific
nuances of transport. Resource allocation issues have since the days of Adam
Smith, and more particularly Alfred Marshall in the late 1890s, centered on
getting the marginal conditions right. To assess how this might be achieved in
theory, and how it materializes in practice, requires some notion of the nature of
the relevant cost and demand conditions – the guts of most introductory econom-
ics courses. The basic principles, although the nuances are still being refined, are
well understood, and much of the recent attention in transport economics has
therefore been on quantification and application in a network context.
Historically, however, this has not always been the case. Much of the analysis
of market structures in transport, for example, paid scant heed to the network
nature of the industry and ipso facto to network externalities. Much of the
interest until 50 years or so ago, as we have hinted at previously, had been on
traditional economic parameters such as market concentration ratios, the degree
of product differentiation and the level of vertical integration. While all these
can be important instruments in the economist’s tool bag, the network nature
of the transport, and the service nature of its outputs, received much less direct
attention in the analysis. Much of the early work on transport demand modeling
10 TRANSPORT ECONOMICS, 3RD EDITION
was also either devoid of any of these network features, or embraced them in a
mechanical fashion. But network features are important, although they often add
complexity to useful analysis.
All network service industries have essentially identical economic charac-
teristics. Their output is non-durable, although they normally require significant
amounts of infrastructure. There are also often very significant external benefits
which, tied with various forms of scale effects, produce network economies. From
the consumer’s perspective, these external economies are related to the fact that
the larger the number of links in a network the greater the degree of connectivity,
and with this the larger the choice set available to him/her – often called ‘econo-
mies of market presence’. On the cost savings side, the ability, where this is most
efficient, to channel traffic through hubs, rather than carry traffic directly between
origins and destinations, creates economies of scope (cost savings by combin-
ing traffic) and of density (the more intensive use of the mode). But complex
networks can also create costs, and most especially congestion can develop on
link roads or flight paths, or at hubs such as sea- and airports in the shipping and
aviation context.
So what does all this mean regarding the day-to-day work of transport
economists? In summary, an understanding of economic institutions is now gen-
erally seen as important for analyzing broad transport issues; nevertheless, the
main ‘tools’ of the transport economist are still taken directly from the kit-bag
of standard micro- and mesoeconomic theory, although one should add that
the actual instruments used have changed significantly over the years. The pre-
Second World War emphasis centered on the transport industries (that is, the
railways, road haulage, shipping and so on.) and, in particular, on ways in which
the transport supply could be improved within a largely regulated structure so
that maximum benefit would be derived from public and private transport opera-
tions. The situation was summarized by one geographer who felt that transport
economics at that time was concerned almost entirely with ‘matters of organiza-
tion, competition and charging, rather than with the effects of transport facilities
on economic activities’.10
To some extent – particularly in relation to international transport and,
to a lesser extent, inter-urban transport – this interest has remained. However,
more recently it has been supplemented by concern with the wider welfare and
spatial implications of transport. Greater emphasis is now placed on the envi-
ronmental and distributional effects of the transport system and, in some cases,
market efficiency is seen as an undesirably narrow criterion upon which to base
major decisions. As Alexander argued, in the speech cited at the beginning of
the chapter, one of the most important roles for economists is to make clear the
overall resource costs of transport rather than just the accounting costs. It is no
accident, perhaps, that much of the early work in cost–benefit analysis (CBA) was
in the transport field.
stimulate the economic development of the Third World. Much of this aid has
been in the form of monies and resources to improve transport provision. Over 20
percent of World Bank lending, for example, goes on transport projects, as does
about 15 percent of total Bank assistance – grants, expertise and so on. Although
it is not altogether agreed that aid actually stimulates growth11 nor that, if it does,
transport investments are the most suitable projects to finance, it is nevertheless
important that within the narrow confines of transport efficiency these monies
are spent wisely. Transport economists have become increasingly involved in the
Third World in transport project appraisal work.
Large private transport businesses often employ economists but more often
they, and smaller enterprises, make use of the many specialist consultancy com-
panies that offer expert advice. The growth in interest in supply-chain logistics,
which spans all movement and storage of raw materials, work-in-process inven-
tory, and finished goods from point of origin to point of consumption, and
within that just-in-time management, has led to a much more implicit incorpora-
tion of economics into transport activities.
One way of looking at this is through the notion of ‘value chain’ initiated
by Michael Porter.12 A value chain is a chain of activities. Products pass through
all activities of the chain in order, and at each activity the product gains some
value. The chain of activities gives the products more added value than the sum
of added values of all activities. Capturing the value generated along the chain is
the new approach taken by many management strategists. For example, a manu-
facturer might require its parts suppliers to be located near its assembly plant to
minimize the cost of transport, or it may require regular delivery of components
to keep production going, while holding minimum stocks of the component. By
exploiting the upstream and downstream information flowing along the value
chain, the firms seek to bypass intermediaries creating new business models, or in
other ways create improvements in its value system.
Figure 1.2 provides a simplified generic value chain. The key point about it is
the extensive number of linkages required through a production process from the
initial extraction of raw materials to the final delivery of goods to a market and
their subsequent servicing. Transport is, at various levels of aggregation and in
different forms, important at all stages. Just-in-time management is, as we see in
Chapter 10 when we look at the links between transport economics and transport
logistics, important in ensuring that as few resources as possible are tied up in the
process at any one time so that inventory holdings are optimized.
The remainder of this introduction is concerned with setting the scene for the
body of the book. Initially, some of the main economic features of the transport
sector are discussed. The intention is, however, not to point to the uniqueness
of transport but rather to highlight the particular characteristics of the sector
that pose special problems for economists. Recent trends in transport are then
Primary activities
Support activities
Procurement, human resource management,
infrastructure, technological development
reviewed and commented upon. To keep the subject matter manageable, much of
the focus will be on the UK and US situations, although experiences elsewhere
will not be neglected. This is followed by a brief review of what appear to be some
of the longer-term factors that are going to attract the attention of transport
economists. Finally, a detailed contextual section explains the format of the book
and outlines briefly the rationale for the structure adopted.
meet ‘need’ rather than demand and, hence, traditional market forces need to be
supplemented to ensure that this wider, social criterion of transport operations is
pursued rather than the simple profit motive.
The remainder of the book is concerned with the application of economic theory
to the transport sector. These are many books that concentrate on particular
modes of transport, such as the railways or shipping, or specific sectors, such
as the nationalized transport industries, or have a geographical bent such as, the
transport policy of the European Union or urban transport problems. One of
the main aims of this book, however, is to show that most challenges in transport
are common to all modes (albeit with minor variations) and cover many different
circumstances. Consequently, the approach is to show how economic theory may
be applied to improve the overall efficiency of the transport sector; examples are,
therefore, drawn from all forms of transport and many contexts.
Also while it is unavoidable, not to say desirable, that official transport
policy must be implicitly incorporated in the analysis, this is not a book explicitly
about transport policy. Economic forces do not operate in a vacuum but within
the context of laws and governance structures. Indeed, economists of the public
choice persuasion such as James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock put particular
emphasis on this political economy dimension.15
It is felt useful, on occasions, to give brief details of institutional arrange-
ments since they inevitably influence the type of economic analysis to apply (for
example, a thumb-nail sketch of the historical and institutional framework of
urban transport planning is included for this purpose), but, again, this is prima-
rily for contextual reasons. The closing chapter is explicitly concerned with policy
and institutions, and in particular with the matter of the economic regulation of
transport markets.
At the theoretical level, the discussion is couched in terms of verbal and
diagrammatic analysis. Mathematical expressions are not shunned, but equations
are included rather as references, permitting readers to look up practical working
models should they subsequently wish to undertake their own empirical investiga-
tions. There are virtually no mathematical derivations, but important equations
are ‘talked around’ and the reader should find no difficulty in following the book
even if his/her mathematical education has been neglected or forgotten.
Indeed the philosophy of the approach adopted here is very much akin to
that espoused by the great economist, Alfred Marshall in a letter to a colleague,
A.L. Bowley, in 1906,
But I know I had a growing feeling in the later years of my work at the subject that a
good mathematical theorem dealing with economic hypotheses was very unlikely to
The length of time over which habitual exposure to lead without the
development of palsy may extend was found by the same observer
to vary from eight days to ten, twenty, or even twenty-five years. One
individual first suffered from paralysis after fifty-two years of
exposure.
In the great majority of the cases the upper extremities and the
extensor muscles are first attacked. If the paralysis be slight other
muscles may escape. The characteristic form of lead paralysis
consists in loss of power in the extensors of the hands and fingers,
especially of the extensor communis, without implication of the
supinator longus. The muscles affected are in the region of
distribution of the musculo-spinal nerve. The deformity is known as
wrist-drop. Next in order, the triceps and deltoid are most frequently
attacked. The lower extremities commonly escape for a considerable
time. When attacked, the extensor muscles of the feet and toes are
the first to suffer.
Women are much less liable than men—a fact clearly due to the
nature of their occupations even when involving exposure to lead.
The majority of the cases have occurred between the ages of twenty
and fifty. Alcoholic habits, insufficient and unwholesome diet,
privations, exposure, and an irregular life especially predispose
those working in lead to the affection. Lead encephalopathy has
developed with nearly equal frequency in warm and in cold weather.
Relapses are frequent.
The mode of action of lead is not yet determined. The view of Henle,
that lead acts chiefly upon the unstriped muscular fibre, was at one
time generally accepted, and served to explain many of the
characteristic phenomena of the disease. On the other hand, there is
much in the clinical history to support the opinion of Heubel, that its
primary action is upon the nervous system. Whether the peripheral
degeneration by which the paralysis is to be explained is primary or
secondary to central degeneration in the anterior cornua of the gray
matter of the spinal cord, is yet in dispute. Some of the forms of
encephalopathy are doubtless due to the nephritis which is found in
many cases of chronic lead disease, and are, in fact, symptoms of
uræmia. In the great majority of the cases this is not the case. The
morbid condition must be explained by the direct toxic action of lead
upon the central nervous system. No theory adequate to account for
all the cerebral manifestations has yet been suggested. Naunyn has
pointed out the resemblance between the nervous and psychical
derangements in lead encephalopathy and those which characterize
chronic alcoholism, and suggests that lead, like alcohol, produces
these effects not as a direct poison, but indirectly in consequence of
abnormal nutrition of the whole system, brought about by the
continued circulation of a foreign poisonous material in the blood.
For the relief of the local paralytic affections local as well as general
treatment is necessary. Massage is of great use, especially when
combined with passive movements. Galvanism, one large electrode
being applied to the cervical vertebræ, the other to the extensor
surface of the affected limbs, is followed by excellent results. Labile
currents of fifteen or twenty cells should be thus applied, the poles
being changed several times at each sitting. As the nutrition of the
muscles improves faradic currents may be occasionally substituted.
Persevering treatment is necessary to obtain the best results.
For the present relief of the arthralgia gentle frictions with or without
anodyne liniments must be employed. The hypodermic use of
morphine may become necessary in cases in which the pain is
urgent. It is, however, here as elsewhere, to be if possible avoided.
The tendency to recurrent joint-pains rapidly disappears as the
poison is eliminated from the organism.
For the relief of the severe cerebral symptoms which are described
under the term Encephalopathy special treatment is of little avail. All
observers agree in recommending an expectant plan. The measures
of treatment directed against the general condition, as above
described, must be steadily continued. The influence of chronic lead-
poisoning upon pregnancy is very deleterious. Constantine Paul14
and others have shown that the early death of the fœtus very
constantly occurs. The prompt removal of women who have become
pregnant, from all exposure to lead, and energetic medicinal
treatment, are needed to obviate the danger of abortion.
14 Arch. gén. de Méd., vol. xv., 1860.
4 Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. iii., No. 4, Oct., 1876, p. 539.
8 Quoted by Eulenburg.
9 Bull. Soc. de Chir. de Par., 1869, 1870, 2d S. ex., 198, and Gaz. des Hôpitaux,
1869.
10 Journ. Nerv. and Ment. Dis., Chicago, 1876, iii. pp. 539-560.
Changes in the skin are among the most constant and striking
phenomena. By some dermatologists the disease is regarded as a
form of morphœa, the keloid of Addison. Morphœa as described by
Duhring11 occurs in the form of patches, rounded, ovoid, or irregular
in outline, small or large, tough or leathery, smooth or shiny, and may
also manifest itself in the form of atrophic pit-like depressions in the
skin. The skin alterations differ somewhat in character; frequently
one of the first signs of the disease is the appearance of a white spot
on the cheek. This was the first noticeable phenomenon observed in
the above case. After a time this spot or patch may change in color,
becoming of a yellowish or brownish hue. A number of spots
appearing and undergoing change, the skin after a time assumes a
mottled appearance. In some of the reported cases a yellowish, or
yellowish-gray, or brownish appearance is recorded as having been
present. In these the observations were probably made after the
affection had existed for some time, and in them the white spots or
patches were probably at first present. In one of Romberg's cases,
first recorded when the patient was nine and a half years of age, he
noted the deposit of a yellowish-gray pigment which began at the
median line and extended to the angle of the jaw across the lower
half of the face and neck, divided here and there by portions of
healthy skin. Discoloration, varying in intensity, also existed in
irregular patches on the upper part of the face and on the forehead.
The discolored tissues were glossy and greasy-looking. The skin
adhering to the bone often gives the patient an aged appearance.
Pruritus has been several times observed.
11 Medical News, vol. xlv. No. 4, July 26, 1884, p. 85.
In one of Bannister's cases the first upper molar of the left side
sometimes ached, and the gum and bone were so wasted as to
expose its roots for a considerable distance. Falling out of the teeth
has been observed in a few other cases.
Atrophy of the bones of the face is frequently present, and has been
determined by careful measurements. It will show to a greater or
lesser extent according to the age of the patient. When the disease
arises after the bony development has been fully acquired, there will
be little external evidence of osseous involvement; when it begins
during the time of active growth of the bone, as it does not
infrequently, the arrest in the skeleton will be very apparent. Thus in
a number of cases beginning in early childhood bone atrophy has
been a very marked feature.