Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download PDF of Smith's Anesthesia For Infants and Children 10th Edition Peter J. Davis - Ebook PDF All Chapter
Full Download PDF of Smith's Anesthesia For Infants and Children 10th Edition Peter J. Davis - Ebook PDF All Chapter
https://ebooksecure.com/download/smiths-anesthesia-for-infants-
and-children-ebook-pdf-2/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-infants-children-and-
adolescents-8th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-infants-children-and-
adolescents-9th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-infants-and-children-
prenatal-through-middle-childhood-8th/
(eBook PDF) Infants and Children: Prenatal Through
Middle Childhood 9th Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-infants-and-children-
prenatal-through-middle-childhood-9th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-wongs-nursing-care-of-
infants-and-children-11th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-mothers-infants-and-
young-children-of-september-11-2001/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/infants-toddlers-and-
caregivers-10th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/critical-heart-disease-in-
infants-and-children-3rd-edition-ebook-pdf/
Smith’s
Anesthesia for
Volume1
Smith’s
Anesthesia for
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the
Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance
Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher
(other than as may be noted herein).
Notice
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds or experiments described herein. Because of rapid
advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages
should be made. To the fullest extent of the law, no responsibility is assumed by Elsevier, authors, editors
or contributors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
Previous editions copyrighted 2017, 2011, 2006, 1996, 1990, 1980, 1968, 1963, and 1959
Printed in the US
Phillip S. Adams, DO, FASA Benjamin B. Bruins, MD Ira Todd Cohen, MD, MEd, FAAP
Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics
Department of Anesthesiology and Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Pain
Perioperative Medicine Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Medicine
Residency Program Director Philadelphia, PA Children’s National Medical Center
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Thomas M. Chalifoux, MD Ashley A. Colletti, MD
Pittsburgh, PA Assistant Professor Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Anesthesiology and Pain
Devon O. Aganga, MD Perioperative Medicine Medicine
Consultant University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine University of Washington
Department of Anesthesiology and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Seattle Children’s Hospital
Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic UPMC Magee-Women's Hospital Seattle, WA
Assistant Professor in Anesthesiology Pittsburgh, PA
College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Erin Conner, MD
Rochester, MN Mary Chapman Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and
Pediatric Dentist Pediatrics
Sean S. Barnes, MD, MBA UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Oregon Health and Science University
Assistant Professor Pittsburgh, PA Portland, OR
Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
Johns Hopkins University School of Debnath Chatterjee, MD, FAAP Edward B. Cooper, MD
Medicine Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Associate Professor
Baltimore, MD Children’s Hospital Colorado Departments of Anesthesiology and
Director of Fetal Anesthesia, Colorado Fetal Pediatrics
Bruno Bissonette, MD, FRCPC Care Center University of Cincinnati School of Medicine
Professor Emeritus of Anesthesia University of Colorado School of Medicine Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical
University of Toronto Aurora, CO Center
Founder and President Cincinnati, OH
Children of the World Anesthesia Rajeev Chaudhry, MD
Foundation Assistant Professor Joseph P. Cravero, MD
Rimouski, Quebec, Canada Department of Urology Anesthesiologist-in-Chief
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital
Brian Blasiole, MD, PhD UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Professor of Anaesthesia
Assistant Professor Pittsburgh, PA Harvard Medical School
Department of Anesthesiology and Boston, MA
Perioperative Medicine Sylvia Choi, MD, FAAP
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Associate Professor Jessica Cronin, MD, MBA
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Department of Pediatrics Assistant Professor
Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Division of Anesthesiology, Pain and
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Perioperative Medicine
Adrian Bosenberg, MBChB FFA(SA) Pittsburgh, PA Children’s National Hospital
Professor Washington, DC
Department Anesthesiology and Pain Franklyn P. Cladis, MD
Management Professor Nicholas M. Dalesio, MD
University of Washington Department of Anesthesiology and Associate Professor
Pediatric Anesthesiologist Perioperative Medicine Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
Seattle Children’s Hospital University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Seattle, WA UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Baltimore, MD
Pittsburgh, PA
Claire M. Brett, MD, FAAP Jessica Davis, BA, JD, LLM
Emeritus Professor of Anesthesia and David E. Cohen, MD Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders, LLP
Perioperative Care and Pediatrics Associate Professor of Anesthesiology at Philadelphia, PA
Division of Pediatric Anesthesia The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
University of California Emeritus, Perelman School of Medicine
San Francisco, CA University of Pennsylvania
Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, PA
vi
CONTRIBUTORS vii
Denise M. Hall-Burton, MD, FAAP Robert S. Holzman, MD, MA (Hon), FAAP Todd J. Kilbaugh
Assistant Professor Senior Associate in Perioperative Anesthesia Associate Professor of Anesthesiology,
Department of Anesthesiology and Boston Children’s Hospital Critical Care, and Pediatrics
Perioperative Medicine Professor of Anaesthesia Department of Anesthesiology and Critical
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Harvard Medical School Care Medicine
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Perelman School of Medicine at the
Pittsburgh, PA Care and Pain Medicine University of Pennsylvania
Boston Children’s Hospital Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Gregory B. Hammer, MD Boston, MA Philadelphia, PA
Professor
Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Vincent C. Hsieh, MD, MS Anjali Koka, MD
Pain Medicine, and Pediatrics Associate Professor Department of Anesthesia
Stanford University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Critical Care and Pain Medicine
Stanford, CA Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital
University of Washington Harvard Medical School
Jennifer L. Hamrick, MD Seattle Children’s Hospital Boston, MA
Senior Partner Seattle, WA
Anesthesia Service Medical Group Rahul Koka, MD, MPH
Pediatric Anesthesia Elizabeth A. Hunt, MPH, PhD, MD Section Chief, Pediatric General Anesthesia
Rady Children’s Hospital Drs. David S. and Marilyn M. Zamierowski Medical Director, Pediatric Operating
San Diego, CA Director Rooms
Johns Hopkins Medicine Simulation Center Assistant Professor
Justin T. Hamrick, MD Professor Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine
Senior Partner Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Johns Hopkins University School of
Anesthesia Service Medical Group Care Medicine, Pediatrics Medicine
Pediatric Anesthesia Health Informatics and Health Policy and Baltimore, MD
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Management
Rady Children’s Hospital Johns Hopkins University School of Pete G. Kovatsis, MD, FAAP
San Diego, CA Medicine Senior Associate in Perioperative Anesthesia
Baltimore, MD Director of Anesthesia for Transplantation
Helen Harvey Co-Director, Anesthesia Advanced Airway
UCSD Pediatric Critical Care Fellowship James W. Ibinson, MD, PhD Management Service
Director Assistant Professor Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care
Pediatric Critical Care Department of Anesthesiology and and Pain Medicine
University of California, San Diego, Rady Perioperative Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital
Children’s Hospital University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Assistant Professor of Anaesthesia
San Diego, CA Chief of Anesthesiology Harvard Medical School
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System Boston, MA
Andrew Herlich, DMD, MD, FAAP, FASA, Pittsburgh, PA
FAAOMS(H) Tatiana Kubacki, MD
Professor Emeritus Caleb Ing Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology and Associate Professor Department of Anesthesiology
Perioperative Medicine Anesthesiology College of Physicians and Surgeons
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Columbia University Medical Center Columbia University
Clinical Professor, Department of Dental New York, NY New York, NY
Anesthesiology
University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Amanpreet Kalsi Barry D. Kussman, MBBCh, FFA (SA), FAAP
Medicine Clinical Assistant Professor Associate Professor of Anaesthesia
Pittsburgh, PA Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology Harvard Medical School
University of Michigan Boston, MA
Monica A. Hoagland, MD Ann Arbor, MI Senior Associate in Cardiac Anesthesia
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Boston Children’s Hospital
Children’s Hospital Colorado Evan Kharasch, MD, PhD Boston, MA
Associate Director of Obstetric and Fetal Merel H. Harmel Professor of Anesthesiology
Anesthesia, Colorado Fetal Care Center Vice-Chair for Innovation Kirk Lalwani, MD, FRCA, MCR, FASA
University of Colorado School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics
Aurora, CO Duke University School of Medicine Vice Chair for Faculty Development
Durham, NC Department of Anesthesiology and
Perioperative Medicine
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, OR
CONTRIBUTORS ix
Etsuro K. Motoyama, MD, FAAP Andrew Nowalk, MD, PhD Teeda Pinyavat, MD
Professor Emeritus Associate Professor and Clinical Director Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology and Pediatrics Division of Infectious Disease Department of Anesthesiology
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics Columbia University Medical Center
Pittsburgh, PA UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh New York, NY
Advisory Dean
Rebecca Nause-Osthoff University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine George Demetrios Politis, MD, MPH
Clinical Assistant Professor Pediatric Residency Program Co-Director Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and
Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology Pediatric Scientist Development Program Pediatrics
University of Michigan (PedSDP) Co-Director University of Virginia Health System
Ann Arbor, MI UPMC Graduate Medical Education Charlottesville, VA
Pittsburgh, PA
Michael E. Nemergut, MD, PhD Andrew J. Powell, MD
Consultant Julie Nyquist, PhD Chief of the Division of Cardiac Imaging
Department of Anesthesiology and Director, Master of Academic Medicine Department of Cardiology
Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Program Boston Children’s Hospital
Assistant Professor in Anesthesiology Professor, Department of Medical Education Professor of Pediatrics
College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Chair, 2021 Innovations in Medical Harvard Medical School
Rochester, MN Education Conference Boston, MA
Keck School of Medicine of the University of
Desiree Noel Wagner Neville, MD Southern California Alexander Praslick, MD
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Los Angeles, CA Clinical Assistant Professor
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and
Associate Director of Emergency Point-of- Shelley Ohliger, MD Perioperative Medicine
Care Ultrasound Assistant Professor University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Department of Anesthesiology UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
and University of Pittsburgh School of Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital Pittsburgh, PA
Medicine Cleveland, OH
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Srijaya K. Reddy, MD, MBA
Pittsburgh, PA Michale Sung-jin Ok, MD Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Assistant Professor of Clinical Anesthesia Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology
Thanh Nguyen, MD and Pediatrics Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at
Department of Anesthesiology University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center/
University of Colorado Anschutz Campus Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
Children’s Hospital of Colorado Center Nashville, TN
Aurora, CO Cincinnati, OH
Paul Reynolds, MD, FAAP
Jonathan A. Niconchuk, MD Meghna D. Patel Professor
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology Clinical Assistant Professor in Pediatric Chief of Pediatric Anesthesiology
Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology Cardiovascular ICU/Cardiology University of Michigan
Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Department of Pediatrics at Stanford Ann Arbor, MI
Vanderbilt University Medical Center/ University
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Karene Ricketts, MD
Nashville, TN Palo Alto, CA Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and
Pediatrics
Julie Niezgoda, MD James Peyton, MBChB MRCP FRCA Anesthesiology
Pediatric Anesthesiology Associate in Perioperative Anesthesia University of North Carolina
Cleveland Clinic Main Campus Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Chapel Hill, NC
Cleveland, OH and Pain Medicine
Boston Children’s Hospital Bobbie L. Riley, MD
Ken K. Nischal, MD, FAAP, FRCOphth Assistant Professor of Anaesthesia, Harvard Department of Anesthesia
Professor Medical School Critical Care and Pain Medicine
Department of Ophthalmology Boston, MA Boston Children's Hospital
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Harvard Medical School
Pediatric Ophthalmology Division Chief Phillip M.T. Pian, MD, PhD Boston, MA
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Anesthesiologist
Pittsburgh, PA Anesthesiology Service
Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health
Care System
Aurora, CO
CONTRIBUTORS xi
Thomas Romanelli, MD, FAAP Allan F. Simpao, MD, MBI Lena S. Sun, MD, FAAP, D.ABA
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Emanuel M. Papper Professor of Pediatric
Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology Critical Care Anesthesiology
Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics
Vanderbilt University Medical Center/ University of Pennsylvania Perelman School Executive Vice Chairman, Department of
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine of Medicine Anesthesiology
Nashville, TN Philadelphia, PA Chief, Division of Pediatric Anesthesia
College of Physicians and Surgeons
Rachael S. Rzasa Lynn, MD Erica L. Sivak, MD Columbia University
Associate Professor Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology New York, NY
Department of Anesthesiology Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
University of Colorado School of Medicine Nationwide Children’s Hospital Melissa Sutcliffe
University of Colorado Hospital Pain Columbus, OH Pediatric Neuropsychologist
Management Clinic Clinical Assistant Professor
Aurora, CO Sarah M. Smith, MD Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation
Assistant Professor Medicine
Nancy Bard Samol, MD Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesiology Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Inpatient
Associate Professor of Pediatric Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Rehabilitation Unit
Anesthesiology Disease Pittsburgh, PA
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Dell Children’s Medical Center
Center University of Texas at Austin Jonathan M. Tan, MD, MPH, MBI, FASA
Cincinnati, OH Austin, TX Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and
Spatial Sciences
Paul J. Samuels, MD Jenna H. Sobey, MD Department of Anesthesiology Critical Care
Professor of Clinical Anesthesia and Pediatrics Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology Medicine
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology Children’s Hospital Los Angeles
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Keck School of Medicine at the University of
Center Vanderbilt University Medical Center/ Southern California
Cincinnati, OH Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Spatial Sciences Institute at the University of
Nashville, TN Southern California
Jamie McElrath Schwartz, MD Los Angeles, CA
Division Chief, Pediatric Critical Care Kyle Soltys, MD
Medicine Associate Professor Jennifer M. Thomas, BSc, STD (Edu),
Co-Director, Blalock-Taussig-Thomas Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute MBChB, FFA
Pediatric and Congenital Heart Center University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Emeritus Professor Paediatric Anaesthesia
Assistant Professor UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital
Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Pittsburgh, PA Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Medicine Judy H. Squires, MD University of Cape Town
Baltimore, MD Associate Professor Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa
Chief of Ultrasound Imaging
Deborah A. Schwengel, MD Associate Program Director, Diagnostic Stevan P. Tofovic, MD, PhD, FAHA, FASN
Associate Professor Radiology Residency Associate Professor of Pharmacology and
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Department of Radiology Chemical Biology and Medicine
Care Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Pharmacology and Chemical
Johns Hopkins University School of UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Biology
Medicine Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD Pittsburgh, PA
Eric T. Stickles, MD
Victor L. Scott Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and
Director Abdominal Transplant Pediatrics
Anesthesiology Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children/
Avera Transplant Institute Sidney Kimmel Medical College at
Avera McKennan University Hospital Thomas Jefferson University
Sioux Falls, SD Wilmington, DE
xii CONTRIBUTORS
Lieu Tran, MD Keith M. Vogt, MD, PhD Eric P. Wittkugel, MD, FAAP
Assistant Professor Assisant Professor Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and
Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics
Perioperative Medicine Perioperative Medicine Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Bioengineering and Center for the Neural Center
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Basis of Cognition Cincinnati, OH
Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Pittsburgh, PA Samuel Yanofsky, MD, MSEd
Premal M. Trivedi, MD Professor of Anesthesiology
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology Andrew Waberski, MD Vice Chair of Education
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, Assistant Professor Department of Anesthesiology and Critical
and Pain Medicine, Division of Pediatric Division of Anesthesiology, Pain and Care Medicine
Cardiovascular Anesthesiology Perioperative Medicine Children’s Hospital Los Angeles
Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Children’s National Hospital
Medicine Washington, DC Myron Yaster, MD
Houston, TX Professor of Anesthesiology, Critical Care
Jeffrey R. Wahl, JD Medicine, and Pediatrics
Chinwe Unegbu, MD President and Co-Founder Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Assistant Professor MIDAS Healthcare Solutions, Inc. Retired
Division of Anesthesiology, Pain and Cleveland, OH Baltimore, MD
Perioperative Medicine
Children’s National Hospital Ari Y. Weintraub, MD Steven Zgleszewski, MD, FAAP
Washington, DC Assistant Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology Associate in Anesthesia
and Critical Care Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain
Samuel M. Vanderhoek Anesthesiology Medicine
Assistant Professor Perelman School of Medicine at the Boston Children’s Hospital
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical University of Pennsylvania Boston, MA
Care Medicine Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Philadelphia, PA Basil J. Zitelli, MD
Baltimore, MD Professor Emeritus
Timothy P. Welch, MD, MSPH Department of Pediatrics
Lisa Vecchione, DMD, MDS* Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Director, Orthodontic Services Pediatrics UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh
Cleft-Craniofacial Center Children’s Hospital and Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC University of Nebraska
Assistant Clinical Professor of Surgery College of Medicine Aaron L. Zuckerberg, MD
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Omaha, NE Children’s Diagnostic Center
Pittsburgh, PA North American Partners of Anesthesia
Emmett E. Whitaker, MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
Chido Vera, MD, MPH Associate Professor Baltimore, MD
Assistant Professor Departments of Anesthesiology, Neurological
Department of Radiology Sciences, & Pediatrics
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
VIDEO CONTRIBUTOR – SMITH
University of Vermont Larner College of
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Medicine TALKS: A LECTURE-SEMINAR
Pittsburgh, PA Burlington, VT Peggy P. McNaull, MD
John Rowlingson Professor and Chair
Adriana M. Vieira, DDS, DMD, MS, PhD Robert K. Williams, MD Department of Anesthesiology
Professor and Chair University of Vermont Larner College of University of Virginia School of Medicine
Department of Pediatric Dentistry Medicine Charlottesville, VA, USA
University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Department of Anesthesiology
Medicine Burlington, VT
Pittsburgh, PA
*Deceased
P R E FA C E
Dr. Robert Smith, a distinguished pioneer in pediatric anesthesia and a great teacher and clinician, wrote the
first edition of this book in 1959, a book subsequently referred to as “the bible” of pediatric anesthesia. The
foreword to the first edition was written by the famous pediatric surgeon Robert E. Gross, the William E.
Ladd Professor of Children’s Surgery at the Harvard Medical School. Though his words in the foreword were
written over 60 years ago, at a time when the specialty of pediatric anesthesia and surgery was in its infant
stages, his words and ideas are still poignant and insightful today.
During the past decade surgery has made important strides in providing safer and improved methods for
handling various problems in infancy and childhood, indeed now making it possible to correct some condi-
tions that were previously thought to be entirely hopeless. Many factors have contributed to these dramatic
advances in pediatric surgery. Outstanding among them is the work of anesthesiologists who have focused
on the field and have provided well-standardized procedures for carrying small and critically ill patients
through operations on literally all portions and every system of the body. The surgeon realizes that the
chances for success or failure are determined in great measure by the capabilities of the person at the head
of the table who is administering the anesthetic.
In some medical circles, there seems to be an attitude that the surgical operator is managing the show; in
others, the anesthetist has an overly possessive feeling toward the patient. Neither approach is proper. It
is best for each to be cognizant of one’s own problems and also to know of the other’s difficulties; both must
work together for total care of the patient. Certainly, this is the most pleasant way to work, and surely it
is the most effective way to conduct a child through a surgical ordeal.
Since the initial printing of this textbook in 1959, the book has been markedly transformed in its content and
in its appearance. The book has gone from mainly a single- to a multi-author book and from a 400-page 70
by 100 book to a 1500-page 11.50 by 8.50 text with an online version. As learning styles have changed, so has
the format of this book. The book uses multimedia presentations to supplement, emphasize, and reinforce
concepts of pediatric anesthesia. However, even with the increases in page number, new information, and
media platforms, the basic tenets of anesthesia care and patient compassion, the legacy and tradition of the
nine previous editions have been retained.
The tenth edition has been prepared with the same considerations as the previous editions: to give anesthe-
siology care providers comprehensive coverage of physiology, pharmacology, and clinical anesthetic man-
agement of infants and children of all ages. The tenth edition has been reorganized into eight main sections.
Part I, Basic Principles and Physiology, contains updated chapters on behavioral development and respira-
tory, cardiovascular, renal, and thermal physiology.
Part II, Pharmacology, now has additional authors with specific chapters in developmental pharmacology,
intravenous anesthetic agents, inhaled anesthetic agents, opioids, local anesthetic agents, neuromuscular
blocking agents, and anesthetic adjuncts.
Part III, General Approach, addresses the basic concepts of caring for children and the principles involved in
the administration of anesthetics to children. The chapters have all been updated. Two new chapters have been
added to Part III: Normal and Difficult Airway Management and Point of Care Ultrasonography.
Part IV is a new section dedicated to Pain Management. It includes updated chapters on acute pain manage-
ment and regional anesthesia. The chapter on regional anesthesia has added some new authors with an
emphasis on ultrasound techniques. The reader will also be able to access video demonstrations of specific
regional anesthetic techniques in children. Part IV also has new chapters: Chronic Pain Management and
Palliative Pain Management.
Part V, Clinical Management of Specialized Surgical Problems, contains material written by new authors.
New authors for chapters on Anesthesia and Sedation for Out of OR Procedures, Pediatric Sedation, and
Medical Missions have been added. The chapter on Solid Organ Transplantation has been updated and also
contains new authors. The use of video has been maintained in a variety of chapters to further supplement
the clinical material. The chapter on Neonatology for Anesthesiologists has been revised into a comprehen-
sive work that updates the anesthesia provider with perinatal outcome data and serves as a primer for pedi-
atric anesthesiologists to better understand the pathophysiology of prematurity and the developmental
xiii
xiv PREFACE
physiology that occur with neonatal growth. This chapter also serves as a rich resource for the chapters on
Anesthesia for General Surgery in Neonates and Anesthesia for Fetal Surgery.
In view of the significant number of disorders that pediatric anesthesiologists are confronted with in the
everyday care of their patients, Part VI, Systemic Disorders and Associated Problems, was created to better
organize and provide information for both unusual patient diseases and to address everyday common peri-
operative anesthetic concerns. All of the chapters in this part have been updated. The chapter on Dermatol-
ogy for the Anesthesiologist has an extensive number of figures (both in the book and online) of lesions and
rashes that anesthesiologists frequently encounter. A new chapter on Infectious Diseases has been added to
this part.
Part VII, Critical Care in Pediatric Anesthesia, contains revised chapters on critical care medicine, cardiac
intensive care, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation chapter contains
the latest (2020) recommendations from the American Heart Association.
Part VIII, Special Topics, includes updated chapters on Safety and Outcome in Pediatric Anesthesia, History
of Pediatric Anesthesia, Medicolegal and Ethical Aspects of Pediatric Anesthesia, and Statistics. A new chap-
ter on Education has been added. This chapter focuses on the role of education and provides guidance to
those who engage in teaching the specialty of pediatric anesthesiology as part of postgraduate training. The
education chapter is organized into six sections and uses “mind maps” (a graphic image of the key concepts)
to provide a quick overview of each of the chapter’s sections.
In keeping with advancements in technology, this edition is in color, and text material is further supple-
mented by a website. Videos of airway techniques, single-lung isolation, regional anesthesia, the use of
ultrasound, and anatomic dissections of congenital heart lesions are accessible with just a click of the mouse.
In addition, supplemental materials on organ transplantation, airway lesions, and pediatric syndromes
remain available.
The project of revising a classic medical textbook presents many opportunities and challenges, and revising
this textbook during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic—when people were stressed, isolated, and
uncertain about their futures—proved to be particularly challenging. Nonetheless, the opportunity to review
and evaluate the new developments that have emerged in pediatric anesthesia since the publication of the last
edition of Smith’s Anesthesia for Infants and Children in 2017 has been rewarding. As always, we are deeply
indebted to the extraordinary work done and commitment made by Dr. Robert M. Smith in the first four
editions that made Anesthesia for Infants and Children a classic textbook in pediatric anesthesia.
Our ability to maintain this book’s standard of excellence is not just a reflection of the many gifted con-
tributors but also a result of the level of support that we have received at work and at home. We wish to thank
the staff members of the Department of Anesthesiology at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh for their
support and tolerance.
Our special thanks go to Joy Holden and Patty Klein, administrative assistants, of the Department of
Anesthesiology, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, for their many hours of diligent work on the
book. We are also appreciative of Dr. Basil Zitelli, Professor Emeritus of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh
at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, for his generosity in allowing us to use many of the photo-
graphs published in his own book, Atlas of Pediatric Physical Diagnosis.
Our special thanks also go to Elsevier’s Sarah Barth, Content Strategist; Kristen Helm, Content Develop-
ment Specialist; and Julie Taylor, Project Manager, for their editorial assistance.
As with the previous editions, we are deeply indebted to our family members Katie, Evan, Zara, Will,
Hunter, and Jake Davis; Julie, Andy, Elliott, Eila, and Mugsy Peet Potash; and Joseph Losee and Hudson
Cladis Losee for remaining loyal, for being understanding, and for providing moral support throughout the
lengthy and, at times, seemingly endless project. Finally, we are indebted to our patients, who grant us the
privilege to care and learn from them and who keep us humble.
xv
CO
G NSTSEANRTYS
LO
xvi
CONTENTS xvii
42 Anesthesia for Dental Procedures, 1132 55 Dermatology for the Anesthesiologist, 1343
Andrew Herlich, Franklyn P. Cladis, Deborah Studen-Pavlovich, Thomas M. Chalifoux, Sylvia Choi, and Basil J. Zitelli
Adriana M. Vieira, Brian Martin, Mary Chapman, and Lisa Vecchione 56 Infectious Diseases, 1358
43 Anesthesia and Sedation for Out-of-Operating-Room Andrew Nowalk
Procedures, 1148
Lieu Tran, Judy Squires, Chido Vera, and Brian Blasiole
44 Pediatric Sedation, 1168 PART VII C
ritical Care in Pediatric
Mary Landrigan-Ossar and Joseph P. Cravero Anesthesia
45 Anesthesia for Surgical Missions, 1184
George Demetrios Politis 57 Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, 1365
Jamie McElrath Schwartz, Rahul Koka, Justin T. Hamrick,
Jennifer L. Hamrick, Elizabeth A. Hunt, and Donald H. Shaffner
PART VI S
ystemic Disorders and Associated 58 Critical Care Medicine, 1413
Problems Elizabeth K. Laverriere, Benjamin Bruins, and Justin L. Lockman
59 Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, 1425
46 Endocrine Disorders, 1199 James Fehr, Meghna Patel, and Timothy Welch
Benjamin B. Bruins, Todd J. Kilbaugh, and Ari Y. Weintraub
47 Respiratory Disorders, 1214
Sarah M. Smith and Premal M. Trivedi
PART VIII Special Topics
48 Cardiovascular Disorders, 1238 60 Safety and Outcome in Pediatric Anesthesia, 1444
Phillip S. Adams Eliot Grigg, Lizabeth Martin, and Lynn Martin
49 Hematology and Coagulation Disorders, 1251 61 History of Pediatric Anesthesia, 1462
Nina A. Guzzetta, Laura A. Downey, and Bruce E. Miller David Levin and Mark A. Rockoff
50 Oncologic Disorders, 1282 62 Medicolegal and Ethical Aspects
Steven Zgleszewski, Franklyn P. Cladis, and Peter J. Davis of Pediatric Anesthesia, 1478
51 Genetic and Muscular Disorders, 1295 Jessica Davis and Jeffrey R. Wahl
Ashley A. Colletti, Philip G. Morgan, and Vincent C. Hsieh 63 Education, 1488
52 Malignant Hyperthermia, 1305 Samuel Yanofsky, Ira Todd Cohen, Franklyn P. Cladis, and Julie Nyquist
Teeda Pinyavat, Thierry Girard, and Ronald S. Litman 64 Statistics, 1499
53 Pediatric Obesity, 1319 James W. Ibinson and Keith M. Vogt
Paul J. Samuels and Michale Sung-jin Ok
54 Special Pediatric Disorders, 1330 Abbreviations, 1510
Eric P. Wittkugel and Nancy Bard Samol Index, 1516
*Deceased
PA R T I
Basic Principles and
Physiology
1. Special Characteristics of Pediatric 5. Cardiovascular Physiology, 90
Anesthesia, 2
6. Regulation of Fluids and Electrolytes, 119
2. Behavioral Development, 11
7. Thermoregulation, 158
3. Respiratory Physiology, 28
1
1
Special Characteristics of Pediatric Anesthesia
Peter J. Davis, Etsuro K. Motoyama, Franklyn P. Cladis
OUTLINE
Introduction, 2 Anatomic and Physiologic Differences, 7
Perioperative Monitoring, 2 Body Size, 7
Anesthetic Agents, 3 Relative Size or Proportion, 7
Airway Devices and Adjuncts, 4 Central and Autonomic Nervous Systems, 8
Intraoperative and Postoperative Analgesia in Neonates, 5 Respiratory System, 9
Point of Care Ultrasound, 5 Cardiovascular System, 9
Regional Analgesia in Infants and Children, 5 Fluid and Electrolyte Metabolism, 9
Fundamental Differences in Infants and Children, 6 Temperature Regulation, 9
Psychological Differences, 6 Summary, 10
Differences in Response to Pharmacologic Agents, 6
INTRODUCTION many anesthesiologists monitored only the heart rate in infants and
In the past few decades, new scientific knowledge of physiology and small children during anesthesia and surgery. Electrocardiographic
pharmacology in developing humans and technologic advancements and blood pressure measurements were either too difficult or too ex-
in equipment and monitoring have markedly changed the practice of travagant and were thought to provide little or no useful information.
pediatric anesthesia. In addition, further emphasis on patient safety Measurements of central venous pressure were thought to be inaccu-
(e.g., correct side-site surgery, correct patient identification, correct rate and too invasive, even in major surgical procedures. The insertion
procedure, appropriate prophylactic antibiotics) coupled with ad- of an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter in infants was considered
vances in minimally invasive pediatric surgery have created a need invasive, and surgeons resisted its use.
for better pharmacologic approaches to infants and children and Smith also added an additional physiologic monitoring: soft, latex
improved skills in pediatric anesthetic management. blood pressure cuffs suitable for newborn and older infants, which
As a result of the advancements and emphasis on pediatric subspe- encouraged the use of blood pressure monitoring in children (Smith
cialty training and practice, the American Board of Anesthesiology has 1968). The Smith cuff (see Chapter 61: History of Pediatric Anesthesia;
now come to recognize the subspecialty of pediatric anesthesiology in Fig. 61.7) remained the standard monitoring device for infants and
its certification process, and the first subspecialty board examination children until the late 1970s, when automated blood pressure devices
was administered in 2013. began to replace them.
The introduction of pulse oximetry for routine clinical use in the early
1990s has been the single most important development in monitoring and
PERIOPERATIVE MONITORING patient safety, especially related to pediatric anesthesia, since the advent of
In the 1940s and 1950s, the techniques of pediatric anesthesia, and the the precordial stethoscope in the 1950s (Smith 1956) (see Chapter 17:
skills of those using and teaching them, evolved more as an art than Equipment; Chapter 18: Monitoring). Pulse oximetry is superior to clini-
as a science, as Dr. Robert Smith (now deceased) vividly and elo- cal observation and other means of monitoring, such as capnography,
quently recollected through his firsthand experiences in his chapter for the detection of intraoperative hypoxemia (Coté et al. 1988, 1991). In
on the history of pediatric anesthesia (see Chapter 61: History of Pe- addition, Spears and colleagues (1991) have indicated that experienced
diatric Anesthesia, updated by Mark A. Rockoff and David Neville pediatric anesthesiologists may not have an “educated hand” or a “feel”
Levine). The anesthetic agents and methods available were limited, as adequate to detect changes in pulmonary compliance in infants. Pulse
was the scientific knowledge of developmental differences in organ oximetry has revealed that postoperative hypoxemia occurs commonly
system function and anesthetic effect in infants and children. Moni- among otherwise healthy infants and children undergoing simple surgical
toring pediatric patients was limited to inspection of chest movement procedures, presumably as a result of significant reductions in functional
and occasional palpation of the pulse until the late 1940s, when Smith residual capacity (FRC) and resultant airway closure and atelectasis
introduced the first physiologic monitoring to pediatric anesthesia by (Motoyama and Glazener 1986). Consequently, the use of supplemental
using the precordial stethoscope for continuous auscultation of heart- oxygen in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) has become a part of
beat and breath sounds (Smith 1953, 1968). Until the mid-1960s, routine postanesthetic care (see Chapter 3: Respiratory Physiology).
2
CHAPTER 1 Special Characteristics of Pediatric Anesthesia 3
clinical studies have described its use for pediatric anesthesia (Wee Equipment; Chapter 19: Normal and Difficult Airway Management).
et al. 1999; Chiaretti et al. 2000; Davis et al. 2000, 2001; German et al. The importance of these advanced airway devices cannot be over-
2000; Dönmez et al. 2001; Galinkin et al. 2001; Keidan et al. 2001b; stated, as evidenced by their use in the algorithms for the difficult
Chambers et al. 2002; Friesen et al. 2003). When combined, intrave- pediatric airway (Park et al. 2017; Garcia-Marcinkiewicz et al. 2019;
nous hypnotic agents (remifentanil and propofol) have been shown to Fiadjoe and Nishisaki 2020).
be as effective and of similar duration as propofol and succinylcholine The variety of pediatric endotracheal tubes (ETTs) has focused on
for tracheal intubation. improved materials and designs. ETTs are sized according to the inter-
The development of more predictable, shorter-acting anesthetic nal diameter; however, the outer diameter (the parameter most likely
agents (see Part II: Pharmacology) has increased the opportunities for involved with airway complications) varies according to the manufac-
pediatric anesthesiologists to provide safe and stable anesthesia with turer (Table 1.1). Tube tips are both flat and beveled, and a Murphy eye
less dependence on the use of neuromuscular blocking agents. may or may not be present. The position of the cuff varies with the
Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine that is metabolized by tissue manufacturer. The use of cuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatrics con-
carboxylesterases to an inactive metabolite. In adult volunteers it tinues to be controversial. In a multicenter, randomized prospective
is rapidly metabolized with fast onset and recovery times and has study of 2246 children from birth to 5 years of age undergoing general
moderate hemodynamic effect (Masui 2020; Schüttler et al. 2020). anesthesia, Weiss and colleagues (2009) noted that cuffed ETTs com-
pared with uncuffed ETTs did not increase the risk for postextubation
stridor (4.4% vs. 4.7%) but did reduce the need for ETT exchanges
AIRWAY DEVICES AND ADJUNCTS (2.1% vs. 30.8%), thereby reducing the possibility of additional trauma
Significant changes in pediatric airway management that have patient from multiple intubation attempts.
safety implications have emerged over the past few years. The laryngeal There has been a recent gradual but steady trend toward the routine
mask airway (LMA), in addition to other supraglottic airway devices and exclusive use of cuffed ETTs in pediatric anesthesia, including in
(e.g., the King LT-D, the Cobra pharyngeal airway), has become an infants (Dullenkopf et al. 2005; Weiss et al. 2009; Litman and Maxwell
integral part of pediatric airway management. Although the LMA is 2013; Tobias 2015). Murat (2001) was the first to propose the use of
not a substitute for the endotracheal tube, it can be safely used for cuffed ETTs exclusively for children of all ages with the record of no
routine anesthesia in both spontaneously ventilated patients and pa- complications without using uncuffed ETTs for a 3-year span in a
tients requiring pressure-controlled support (Keidan et al. 2001a). The major children’s hospital in Paris. The change in practice of not using
LMA can also be used in the patient with a difficult airway to aid in uncuffed ETT is due to the recognition that the shape of the glottic
ventilation and to act as a conduit to endotracheal intubation both opening at the cricoid ring, the narrowest fixed diameter in the upper
with and without a fiber optic bronchoscope. airways, is more elliptic in shape than circular, with a larger anteropos-
In addition to supraglottic devices, advances in technology for vi- terior (AP) diameter and a narrower transverse diameter (Dalal et al.
sualizing the airway have improved patient safety. Since the larynx 2009; Litman and Maxwell 2013). These findings mean that the most
could be visualized, at least 50 devices intended for laryngoscopy have appropriately sized uncuffed ETT (,20 cm H2O leak pressure) would
been invented. The newer airway visualization devices have combined compress the lateral wall mucosa of the cricoid, causing ischemia
better visualizations, video capabilities, and high resolution. even when there are enough anteroposterior spaces left for air leaks
The development and refinement of airway visualization equip- (Motoyama 2009). A recently developed thin-walled (with smaller
ment such as the McGrath, C-MAC, and Glidescope have added more outer diameter), cuffed endotracheal tube specifically designed for
options to the management of the pediatric airway and literally give pediatric anesthesia (Microcuff by Kimberly-Clark) has two major
the laryngoscopist the ability to see around corners (see Chapter 17: modifications: the cuff is made of ultrathin polyurethane, allowing a
TABLE 1.1 Measured Outer Diameters of Pediatric Cuffed Tracheal Tubes According
to the Internal Diameter of Tracheal Tubes Supplied by Different Manufacturers
ID Tracheal Tube Brand 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
OD (mm) Sheridan Tracheal Tube Cuffed Murphy NA 4.2 4.9 5.5 6.2 6.8 7.5
Sheridan Tracheal Tube Cuffed Magill NA 4.3 NA 5.5 NA 6.9 NA
Mallinckrodt TT High-Contour Murphy NA 4.4 4.9 5.7 6.3 7 7.6
Mallinckrodt TT High-Contour Murphy P-Series NA 4.3 5 5.7 6.4 6.7 7.7
Mallinckrodt TT Lo-Contour Magill NA 4.5 4.9 5.7 6.2 6.9 7.5
Mallinckrodt TT Lo-Contour Murphy NA 4.4 5 5.6 6.2 7 7.5
Mallinckrodt TT Hi-Lo Murphy NA NA NA NA NA 6.9 7.5
Mallinckrodt TT Safety Flex NA 5.2 5.5 6.2 6.7 7.2 7.9
Portex TT-Profile Soft Seal Cuff, Murphy NA NA NA NA NA 7 7.6
Rüsch Ruschelit Super Safety Clear Magill 4 5.1 5.3 5.9 6.2 6.7 7.2
Rüsch Ruschelit Super Safety Clear Murphy NA NA NA NA NA 6.7 7.3
Halyard Microcuff (formerly Kimberly-Clark Healthcare) NA 4.3 5.0 5.6 6.3 6.7 7.3
more effective tracheal seal at a much lower pressure than the pressure therapeutic applications in pediatric patients of all ages. In addition
known to cause tracheal mucosal necrosis, and the short cuff is located to its widely accepted role in regional anesthesia and vascular access,
more distally near the tip of the endotracheal tube shaft, allowing more ultrasonography can facilitate diagnostic procedures including airway
reliable placement of the cuff below the nondistensible cricoid ring management, pulmonary pathology like pneumothorax, fluid man-
and reducing the chance of endobronchial intubation (Dullenkopf agement, and nasogastric tube positioning. (See Chapter 20: Point of
et al. 2005; Litman and Maxwell 2013). Whether the new, more costly Care Ultrasonography.)
endotracheal tube actually reduces the incidence of intubation-related
airway injury is being investigated. REGIONAL ANALGESIA IN INFANTS
A main concern with cuffed endotracheal tubes relates to excessive
AND CHILDREN
pressure in the cuff. The exact pressure a cuff needs to exert against the
wall of the tracheal mucosae to induce ischemia is not known; recom- Although conduction analgesia has been used in infants and children
mendations range from 20 to 30 cm H2O. In an observational trial of since the beginning of the 20th century, the controversy about whether
200 pediatric patients, Tobias and colleagues (2012) noted that when anesthetic agents can be neurotoxic has caused a resurgence of interest
cuff pressures were measured, 23.5% of the patients had pressures in regional anesthesia (Abajian et al. 1984; Williams et al. 2006).
greater than 30. Various devices have been prepared to monitor intra- As newer local anesthetic agents with less systemic toxicity become
cuff pressure (Krishna et al. 2014; Ramesh et al. 2014; Kako et al. available, their role in the anesthetic/analgesic management of chil-
2015; Tobias 2015). Although the role of cuffed ETTs in neonates and dren is increasing. Studies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine have
infants who require prolonged ventilation has yet to be determined demonstrated safety and efficacy in children that are greater than that
(Sathyamoorthy et al. 2015), it is clear that in neonates undergoing of bupivacaine, the standard regional anesthetic used in the 1990s
minimally invasive surgery, cuffed endotracheal tubes allow for more (Ivani et al. 1998, 2002, 2003; Hansen et al. 2000, 2001; Lönnqvist et al.
effective ventilation and more reliable end-tidal gas monitoring while 2000; McCann et al. 2001; Karmakar et al. 2002). A single dose of local
likely maintaining safety (de Wit et al. 2018; Thomas et al. 2018). anesthetics through the caudal and epidural spaces is most often used
for a variety of surgical procedures as part of general anesthesia and for
INTRAOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE postoperative analgesia. Insertion of an epidural catheter for continu-
ous or repeated bolus injections of local anesthetics (often with opi-
ANALGESIA IN NEONATES oids and other adjunct drugs) for postoperative analgesia has become
It has long been thought that newborn infants do not feel pain the way a common practice in pediatric anesthesia. The addition of adjunct
older children and adults do and therefore do not require anesthetic or medications, such as midazolam, neostigmine, tramadol, ketamine,
analgesic agents (Lippmann et al. 1976). Thus in the past, neonates and clonidine, to prolong the neuroaxial blockade from local anes-
undergoing surgery were often not afforded the benefits of anesthesia. thetic agents has become more popular, even though the safety of these
Later studies, however, indicated that pain experienced by neonates agents on the neuroaxis has not been determined (Ansermino et al.
can affect behavioral development (Dixon et al. 1984; Taddio et al. 2003; de Beer and Thomas 2003; Walker and Yaksh 2012) (see also
1995; Taddio and Katz 2005). Rats exposed to chronic pain without the Part IV: Pain Management).
benefit of anesthesia or analgesia showed varying degrees of neuro- In addition to neuroaxial blockade, specific nerve blocks that are
apoptosis (Anand et al. 2007). However, to add further controversy performed with or without ultrasound guidance have become an
to the issue of adequate anesthesia for infants, concerns have been integral part of pediatric anesthesia (see Chapter 24: Regional Anes-
raised regarding the neurotoxic effects of both intravenous and inha- thesia) (Boretsky et al. 2013; Hall-Burton and Boretsky 2014; Long
lational anesthetic agents (GABAergic and NMDA antagonists) (see et al. 2014; Visoiu et al. 2014; Suresh et al. 2015). The use of ultra-
Chapter 2: Behavioral Development). sound has allowed for the administration of smaller volumes of local
Although postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is an adult anesthetic and for more accurate placement of the local anesthetic
phenomenon, animal studies by multiple investigators have raised (Willschke et al. 2006; Gurnaney et al. 2007; Ganesh and Gurnaney
concerns about anesthetic agents being toxic to the developing brains 2009). The use of catheters in peripheral nerve blocks has also
of infants and small children (Jevtovic-Todorovic et al. 2003; Mellon changed the perioperative management for a number of pediatric
et al. 2007; Jevtovic and Olney 2008; Wang and Slikker 2008; Rappa- surgical patients. Continuous peripheral nerve catheters with infu-
port et al. 2015). Early work by Uemura and colleagues (1985) noted sions are being used by pediatric patients at home after they have been
that synaptic density was decreased in rats exposed to halothane in discharged from the hospital (Ganesh et al. 2007; Gurnaney et al.
utero. Further work with rodents, by multiple investigators, has shown 2014; Visoiu et al. 2014). The use of these at-home catheters has
evidence of apoptosis in multiple areas of the central nervous system allowed for shorter hospital stays.
during the rapid synaptogenesis period. This window of vulnerability As pediatric regional anesthesia becomes more prevalent, the abil-
appears to be a function of time, dose, and duration of anesthetic ex- ity to collect data, audit practice patterns, and report on complications
posure. In addition to the histochemical changes of apoptosis, the ex- in infants and children undergoing regional anesthesia becomes es-
posed animals also demonstrated learning and behavioral deficits later sential to improving care for children. In this context, the Pediatric
in life. The potential neurotoxic risk of anesthetic agents is less clear in Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) was formed (Polaner et al. 2012;
human pediatric patients. Studies performed on this population have Long et al. 2014; Taenzer et al. 2014; Suresh et al. 2015). Walker and
helped to clarify this risk, and it appears that a single short anesthetic colleagues (2018) reported on over 100,000 blocks in children from the
in early infancy has no adverse effects on IQ at 2 and 5 years of age. See PRAN registry and noted that there was no added risk of placing a
Chapter 2 (Behavioral Development) for a more in-depth discussion. block in the anesthetized child. The risk of transient neurologic deficit
was 2.4:10,000 patients and severe local anesthetic systemic toxicity
was 0.76:10,000 patients.
POINT OF CARE ULTRASOUND In addition to advances in anesthetic pharmacology and equip-
Ultrasound has advanced the care of many medical specialties, in- ment, advances in the area of pediatric minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
cluding pediatric anesthesiology. This technology has diagnostic and have improved patient morbidity, shortened the length of hospital
6 PART 1 Basic Principles and Physiology
stays, and improved surgical outcomes (Fujimoto et al. 1999). Al- TABLE 1.2 Aspects of Developmental
though MIS imposes physiologic challenges in the neonate and small
Assessment and Common Developmental
infant, numerous neonatal surgical procedures can nevertheless be
successfully approached with such methods, even in infants with single-
Milestones
ventricle physiology (Georgeson 2003; Ponsky and Rothenberg 2008). Follows dangling object from midline through 1 month
The success of MIS has allowed for the evolution of robotic techniques, a range of 90 degrees
stealth surgery (scarless surgery), and Natural Orifice Transluminal Follows dangling object from midline through 3 months
Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) (Dutta and Albanese 2008; Dutta et al. a range of 180 degrees
2008; Isaza et al. 2008). Consistent conjugate gaze (binocular vision) 4 months
Alerts or quiets to sound 0–2 months
FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCES IN INFANTS
Head up 45 degrees 2 months
AND CHILDREN Head up 90 degrees 3–4 months
Regardless of all the advances in equipment, monitoring, and patient Weight on forearms 3–5 months
safety initiatives, pediatric anesthesia still requires a special under- Weight on hands with arms extended 5–6 months
standing of anatomic, psychological, and physiologic development.
Complete head lag, back uniformly rounded Newborn
The reason for undertaking a special study of pediatric anesthesia is
that children, especially infants younger than a few months of age, Slight head lag 3 months
differ markedly from adolescents and adults. Many of the important Rolls front to back 4–5 months
differences, however, are not the most obvious. Although the most Rolls back to front 5–6 months
apparent difference is size, it is the physiologic differences related to Sits with no support 7 months
general metabolism and immature function of the various organ Hands predominantly closed 1 month
systems (including the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, blood, muscles,
Hands predominantly open 3 months
and central nervous system) that are of major importance to the
anesthesiologist. Foot play 5 months
Transfers objects from hand to hand 6 months
Psychological Differences Index finger approach to small objects 10 months
For a child’s normal psychological development, continuous support and finger-thumb opposition
of a nurturing family is indispensable at all stages of development; Plays pat-a-cake 9–10 months
serious social and emotional deprivation (including separation from
Pulls to stand 9 months
parents during hospitalization), especially during the first 2 years of
Walks with one hand held 12 months
development, may cause temporary or even lasting damage to psycho-
social development (Forman et al. 1987). A young child who is hospi- Runs well 2 years
talized for surgery is forced to cope with separation from parents, to Social smile 1–2 months
adapt to a new environment and strange people, and to experience Smiles at image in mirror 5 months
the pain and discomfort associated with anesthesia and surgery Separation anxiety/stranger awareness 6–12 months
(see Chapter 2: Behavioral Development; Chapter 15: Psychological
Interactive games: peek-a-boo and pat-a-cake 9–12 months
Aspects of Pediatric Anesthesia).
The most intense fear in an infant or a young child is created Waves “bye-bye” 10 months
by separation from the parents, and it is often conceived as loss of Cooing 2–4 months
love or abandonment. The sequence of reactions observed is often Babbles with labial consonants (“ba,” “ma,” “ga”) 5–8 months
as follows: angry protest with panicky anxiety, depression, and de- Imitates sounds made by others 9–12 months
spair, and eventually apathy and detachment (Bowlby 1973). Older
First words (approximately four to six, including 9–12 months
children may be more concerned with painful procedures and the
“mama,” “dada”)
loss of self-control that is implicit with general anesthesia (Forman
Understands one-step command (with gesture) 15 months
et al. 1987). Repeated hospitalizations for anesthesia and surgery
may be associated with psychosocial disturbances in later childhood Ages are averages based primarily on data from Arnold Gesell.
(Dombro 1970). In children who are old enough to experience Modified from Illingworth, R. S. (1987). The development of the infant
fear and apprehension during anesthesia and surgery, the emotional and young child: normal and abnormal. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
factor may be of greater concern than the physical condition; in fact,
it may represent the greatest problem of the perioperative course
(see Chapter 15: Psychological Aspects of Pediatric Anesthesia) Differences in Response to Pharmacologic Agents
(Smith 1980). The extent of the differences among infants, children, and adults in
All of these responses can and should be reduced or abolished response to the administration of drugs is not just a size conversion.
through preventive measures to ease the child’s adaptation to the hos- During the first several months after birth, rapid development and
pitalization, anesthesia, and surgery. The anesthesiologist’s role in this growth of organ systems take place, altering the factors involved in
process, as well as having a basic understanding of neurobehavioral uptake, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of anesthetics and
development, is important (Table 1.2). Anesthesiologists must also related drugs. Interindividual variability of a response to a given drug
be open to new ideas regarding the role of family-centered care, spe- may be determined by a variety of genetic factors. Genetic influences
cifically in regard to pediatric patients with psychiatric diagnoses or in biotransformation, metabolism, transport, and receptor site all
special needs who may benefit from the presence of service animals. affect an individual’s response to a drug. These changes appear to
Ambardekar and colleagues (2013) reported on the use of a service be responsible for developmental differences in drug response and
animal to help with the induction of anesthesia. can be further modified by age-related and environmental factors.
CHAPTER 1 Special Characteristics of Pediatric Anesthesia 7
Height in centimeters
0.3
20
Weight in kilograms
adult BSA and 1/20 the adult weight (Fig. 1.1). Of these body measure- 50
Weight in pounds
15
Height in feet
ments, BSA is probably the most important, because it closely parallels
18 45
variations in basal metabolic rate measured in kilocalories per hour
per square meter. For this reason, BSA is believed to be a better crite- 5
16 40
rion than age or weight in judging basal fluid and nutritional require- 0.2
10
ments. For clinical use, however, BSA proves somewhat difficult to
14 35
determine, although a nomogram such as that of Talbot and associates
(1952) facilitates the procedure considerably (Fig. 1.2). For the anes-
thesiologist who carries a pocket calculator, the following formulas may 1 30
be useful to calculate BSA:
10
Formula of DuBois and DuBois (1916 ) 9 5
25 0.1
BSA (m2 ) 0.007184 Height 0.725 Weight 0.425 8
BSA (m 2
) = 0.0235 Height 0.42246
Weight 0.51456
.
Fig. 1.2 Body Surface Area Nomogram for Infants and Young Children.
(From Talbot, N. B., Sobel, E. H., McArthur, J. W., & Crawford, J. D. (1952).
At full-term birth, BSA averages 0.2 m2, whereas in the adult it aver-
ages 1.75 m2. Table 1.3 shows the relation of age, height, and weight to
BSA. A simpler, crude estimate of BSA for children of average height
and weight is given in Table 1.4. The formula is also reasonably accu-
rate in children of normal physique weighing 21 to 40 kg (Vaughan
and Litt 1987):
Cardiovascular System
HUMAN BRAIN GROWTH During the first minutes after birth, the newborn infant must change
100 his or her circulatory pattern dramatically from fetal to adult types of
90 circulation to survive in the extrauterine environment. Even for several
months after initial adaptation, the pulmonary vascular bed remains
80
% Full-term brain weight
Regulation of body temperature is discussed in detail in Chapter 7 use of preoperative sedation via the transmucosal route, the wide use of
(Thermoregulation). topical analgesia with a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream be-
fore intravenous catheterization, expanded use of regional anesthesia
with improved accuracy and safety by means of ultrasound devices, and
SUMMARY more general acceptance of parental presence during anesthetic induc-
Pediatric anesthesia as a subspecialty has evolved because the needs of tion and in the recovery room. Furthermore, a more diverse anesthetic
infants and young children are fundamentally different from those of approach has evolved through the combined use of regional analgesia,
adults. The pediatric anesthesiologist should be aware of the child’s together with the advent of newer and less soluble volatile anesthetics,
cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, neuromuscular, and central nervous intravenous anesthetics, sedatives, and shorter-acting synthetic opioids
system responses to various drugs, as well as to physical and chemical and muscle relaxants. Finally, the scope of pediatric anesthesia has sig-
stimuli, such as changes in blood oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions, nificantly expanded with the recent development of organized pain
pH, and body temperature. Their responses are different both qualita- services in most pediatric institutions. As a result, pediatric anesthesi-
tively and quantitatively from those of adults and among different ologists have assumed the leading role as pain management specialists,
pediatric age groups. More importantly, the pediatric anesthesiologist thus further extending anesthesia services and influence beyond the
should always consider the child’s emotional needs and create an envi- boundary of the operating room.
ronment that minimizes or abolishes fear and distress.
There have been many advances in the practice of anesthesia to
improve the comfort of young patients over the last decade. These ad-
REFERENCES
vances include a relaxation of preoperative fluid restriction, more fo- Complete references used in this text can be found online at Expert
cused attention to the child’s psychological needs with more extensive Consult.com.
2
Behavioral Development
Julie Niezgoda, Melissa Sutcliffe, Caleb H. Ing, Richard J. Levy
OUTLINE
Introduction, 11 Executive Functioning, 22
Prenatal Growth, 12 Sensorimotor, 22
Postnatal Growth, 12 Anesthetic Neurotoxicity, 22
Developmental Assessment, 12 Brief Evidence From Preclinical Models, 23
Motor Development, 13 Proposed Mechanisms of Neurotoxicity, 23
Primitive Reflexes, 13 Neurocognitive Effects in Rodents and Nonhuman Primates, 23
Gross Motor Skills, 14 Problems With Translating to Humans, 23
Fine Motor Development, 14 Observational Studies in Children, 23
Language Development, 14 Academic Achievement, 24
Cognitive Development, 18 Learning Disability, 24
Clinical Relevance of Growth and Development in Pediatric Clinical Diagnoses of Developmental and Psychiatric
Anesthesia, 19 Disorders, 25
Neuropsychological Testing as a Tool for Assessing the Neuropsychological Testing and Behavioral Surveys, 25
Neurodevelopmental Effects of Anesthesia, 20 Vulnerable Age Periods, 26
Neuropsychological Domains, 22 Potentially Toxic Exposure Doses, 26
Intelligence, 22 The Problem With Observational Studies, 26
Speech and Language, 22 Clinical Trials, 26
Visual-Spatial Skills, 22 Summary and Recommendations, 26
Attention and Processing Speed, 22 Acknowledgments, 27
Learning and Memory, 22
11
12 PART 1 Basic Principles and Physiology
the safety of administering general anesthesia during early childhood. Of the three parameters, weight is the most sensitive measurement
These issues are more complex than the potential behavioral or emo- of well-being and is the first to show deviance as an indication of an
tional changes that may result in the postoperative period because of underlying problem. Causes of weight loss and failure to thrive include
perioperative stress impacting specific developmental stages of the congestive heart failure, metabolic or endocrine disorders, malignancy,
pediatric patient. They relate to the mounting evidence of animal data infections, and malabsorption problems. Inadequate increases in
showing that early exposure to anesthetics can induce apoptotic neu- height over time can occur secondary to significant weight loss, and
rodegeneration and subsequent maladaptive behaviors in immature decreased head circumference is the last parameter to change, signify-
animals (Rappaport et al. 2015). The relevance of animal data to anes- ing severe malnutrition. Pathologies such as hydrocephalus or in-
thetic practice is unknown. The final section of this chapter evaluates creased intracranial pressure may appear on growth charts as head
some of the current published retrospective and ongoing prospective circumference measurements that are rapidly increasing and crossing
human studies with regard to this topic. To better understand this is- percentiles. Small head size can be associated with craniosynostosis or
sue, there is a need for well-designed clinical studies to generate data a syndromic feature. Notable changes in head circumference measure-
regarding the neurodevelopmental risks of pediatric anesthesia. The ments in children should alert the anesthesiologist to the potential of
importance of using neuropsychological testing in future pediatric underlying neurologic problems.
clinical research as a tool for assessing the neurodegeneration/neuro- Because significant weight fluctuation is a potential red flag for
developmental effects of anesthesia on the central nervous system serious underlying medical conditions, anesthesiologists should be
(CNS) during this critical period is reviewed. familiar with the normal weight gain expected for children. It is not
unusual for a newborn’s weight to decrease by 10% in the first week of
life because of the excretion of excess extravascular fluid or possibly
PRENATAL GROWTH poor oral intake. Infants should regain or exceed birth weight by
The most dramatic events in growth and development occur before 2 weeks of age and continue to gain approximately 30 g/day, with a
birth. These changes are overwhelmingly somatic, with the transforma- gradual decrease to 12 g/day by the end of the first year. Healthy,
tion of a single cell into an infant. The first 8 weeks of gestation are full-term infants typically double their birth weight at 6 months and
known as the embryonic period and encompass the time when the ru- triple it by 1 year of age. Many complex formulas are available to esti-
diments of all of the major organs are developed. This period denotes a mate the average weight for normal infants and children. A relatively
time in which the fetus is highly sensitive to teratogens such as alcohol, simple calculation to recall is the “rule of tens”; that is, the weight of
tobacco, mercury, thalidomide, and antiepileptic drugs. The average a child increases by about 10 pounds per year until approximately 12
embryo weighs 9 g and has a crown-to-rump length of 5 cm. The fetal to 13 years of age for females and 16 to 17 years of age for males.
stage (more than 9 weeks’ gestation) consists of increases in cell number Therefore one could expect weight gain of 20 pounds by age 2 years,
and size and structural remodeling of organ systems (Moore 1972). 30 pounds by 3 years, 40 pounds by 4 years, and so on. The weight in
During the third trimester, weight triples and length doubles as pounds can be converted to kilograms by dividing it by 2.2. Expected
body stores of protein, calcium, and fat increase. Low birth weight can length in centimeters is estimated by the following formula:
result from prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation (small for
gestational age, SGA), or both. Large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants ( Age in years 6 ) 77.
are those whose weight is above the 90th percentile at any gestational
age. Deviations from the normal relationship of infant weight gain
DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMENT
with increasing gestational age can be multifactorial. Potential causes
include maternal diseases (e.g., diabetes, pregnancy-induced hyperten- Developmental assessment serves different purposes, depending on
sion, and seizure disorders), prenatal exposure to toxins (e.g., alcohol, the age of the child. In the neonatal period, behavioral assessment can
drugs, and tobacco), fetal toxoplasmosis-rubella-cytomegalovirus- detect a wide range of neurologic impairments. During infancy, assess-
herpes simplex-syphilis (TORCHES) infections, genetic abnormalities ment serves to reassure parents and to identify sensory, motor, cogni-
(e.g., trisomies 13, 18, and 21), fetal congenital malformations (e.g., tive, and emotional problems early, when they are most amenable to
cardiopulmonary or renal malformations), and maternal malnutrition treatment. Middle childhood and adolescence assessments often help
or placental insufficiency (Kinney and Kumar 1988). with addressing academic and social problems.
Milestones are useful indicators of mental and physical develop-
ment and possible deviations from normal. It should be emphasized
POSTNATAL GROWTH that milestones represent the average age for children to attain skills
Postnatal growth is measured by changes in weight, length, and head and that there can be variable rates of mastery that fall into the normal
circumference plotted chronologically on growth charts. This is an es- range. An acceptable developmental screening test must be highly sen-
sential component of pediatric health surveillance, because almost any sitive (detect nearly all children with problems); specific (not identify
problem involving physiologic, interpersonal, or social domains can too many children without problems); have content validity, test-re-
adversely affect growth. test, and interrater reliability; and be relatively quick and inexpensive
Growth milestones are the most predictable, taking into context to administer. The most widely used developmental screening test is
each child’s specific genetic and ethnic influences (Johnson and Blasco the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST), which provides a
1997). It is essential to plot the child’s growth on gender- and age- pass/fail rating in four domains of developmental milestones: gross
appropriate percentile charts. Charts are now available for certain motor, fine motor, language, and personal-social. The original DDST
ethnic groups and genetic syndromes such as trisomy 21 and Turner was criticized for underidentification of children with developmental
syndrome. Deviation from growth over time across percentiles is of disabilities, particularly in the area of language. The reissued DDST-II
greater significance for a child than a single weight measurement. For is a better assessment for language delays, which is important because
example, an infant at the 5th percentile of weight for age may be of the strong link between language and overall cognitive develop-
growing normally, failing to grow, or recovering from growth failure, ment. Table 2.1 lists the prevalence of some common developmental
depending on the trajectory of the growth curve. disabilities (Levy and Hyman 1993).
CHAPTER 2 Behavioral Development 13
TABLE 2.1 Prevalence of Developmental birth because of the high flexor tone of the newborn infant. When the
neonate’s head is turned to one side, there is increased extensor tone of
Disabilities
the upper extremity on the same side and increased flexor tone on the
Condition Prevalence per 1000 contralateral side. The ATNR is a precursor to hand-eye coordination,
Cerebral palsy 2–3 preparing the infant for gazing along the upper arm and voluntary
Visual impairment 0.3–0.6 reaching. The disappearance of this reflex at 4 to 6 months allows
the infant mobility to roll over and begin to examine and manipulate
Hearing impairment 0.8–2
objects in the midline with both hands.
Mental retardation 25
The palmar grasp reflex is present at birth and persists until 4 to
Learning disability 75 6 months of age. When an object is placed in the infant’s hand, the
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 150 fingers close and tightly grasp the object. The grip is strong but unpre-
Behavioral disorders 60–130 dictable. The waning of the early grasp reflex allows infants to hold
Autism 9–10 objects in both hands and ultimately to voluntarily let them go.
The Moro reflex is probably the most well-known primitive reflex
and is present at birth. It is likely to occur as a startle to a loud noise or
sudden changes in head position. The legs and head extend while the
MOTOR DEVELOPMENT arms jerk up and out, followed by adduction of the arms and tightly
clenched fists. Bilateral absence of the reflex may mean damage to the
Primitive Reflexes infant’s CNS. Unilateral absence could indicate birth trauma, such as a
The earliest motor neuromaturational markers are primitive reflexes fractured clavicle or brachial plexus injury.
that develop during uterine life and generally disappear between the Postural reflexes support control of balance, posture, and move-
third and sixth months after birth. Newborn movements are largely ment in a gravity-based environment. The protective equilibrium re-
uncontrolled, with the exception of eye gaze, head turning, and suck- sponse can be elicited in a sitting infant by abruptly pushing the infant
ing. Development of the infant’s CNS involves strengthening of the laterally. The infant will extend the arm on the contralateral side and
higher cortical center, which gradually takes over function of the primi- flex the trunk toward the side of the force to regain the center of grav-
tive reflexes. Postural reflexes replace primitive reflexes between 3 and ity (Fig. 2.1). The parachute response develops around 9 months and
6 months of age as a result of this development (Schott and Rossor is a response to a free-fall motion, where the infant extends the ex-
2003). These reactions allow children to maintain a stable posture even tremities in an outward motion to distribute weight over a broader
if they are rapidly moved or jolted (Box 2.1). area. Postural reactions are markedly slow in appearance in the infant
The asymmetric tonic neck reflex (ATNR) or “fencing posture” is who has CNS damage. Children who fail to gain postural control con-
an example of a primitive reflex that is not immediately present at tinue to display traces of primitive reflexes. They also have difficulty
with control of movement affecting coordination, fine and gross mo-
tor development, and other associated aspects of learning, including
BOX 2.1 Definitions of Primitive Reflexes reading and writing. Table 2.2 lists the average times of appearance and
disappearance of the more common primitive reflexes.
Automatic stepping reflex: Although the infant cannot support his or her
weight when a flat surface is presented to the sole of the foot, he or she
makes a stepping motion by bringing one foot in front of the other.
Crossed extension reflex: When an extremity is acutely stimulated to with-
draw, the flexor muscles in the withdrawing limb contract completely,
whereas the extensor muscles relax. The opposite occurs (full extension,
with relaxation of contracting muscles) in the opposite limb.
Galant reflex: An infant whose back is stroked on one side moves or swings
in that direction.
Moro reflex: When the infant is startled with a loud noise or when the head
is lowered suddenly, the head and legs extend and the arms raise up and
out. Then the arms are brought in and the fingers close to make fists.
Palmar reflex: When an object is placed into the infant’s hand or when the
palm of the infant’s hand is stroked with an object, the hand closes around
the object.
Asymmetric tonic neck reflex (“fencing”): When the infant’s head is
rotated to one side, the arm on that side straightens and the opposite arm
flexes.
Landau reflex: When the infant is held in a horizontal position, he or she
raises the head and bring the legs up into a horizontal position. If the head
is forced down (flexed), the legs also lower into a vertical position.
Derotational righting reflex: When the infant turns the head one direction,
the body leans in the same direction to maintain balance.
Protective equilibrium reflex: When a lateral force is applied to the infant, he
or she responds by leaning into the force and extending the contralateral arm.
Parachute reflex: When the infant is facing down and lowered suddenly, the
arms extend out in a protective maneuver. Fig. 2.1 The Protective Equilibrium Response is Demonstrated in an
that is necessary for interactive play with other children. Fig. 2.3 shows
TABLE 2.2 Primitive Reflexes
the red flags to watch for in the abnormal physical development of the
Present by Gone by infant.
Reflex (Months) (Months)
Automatic stepping Birth 2 Fine Motor Development
Crossed extension Birth 2 At birth, the neonate’s fingers and thumbs are typically tightly fisted.
Galant Birth 2
Normal development moves from the primitive grasp reflex, where the
infant reflexively grabs an object but is unable to release it, to a volun-
Moro Birth 3–6
tary grasp and release of the object. By 2 to 3 months of age, the hands
Palmar Birth 4–6 are no longer tightly fisted, and the infant begins to bring them toward
Asymmetric tonic neck 1 4–6 the mouth, sucking on the digits for self-comfort. Objects can be held
(“fencing”) in either hand by age 3 months and transferred back and forth by
Landau 3 12–24 6 months. In early development, the upper extremities assist with bal-
Derotational head righting 4 Persists ance and mobility. As the sitting position is mastered with improved
balance, the hands become more available for manipulation and explo-
Protective equilibrium 4–6 Persists
ration. The evolution of the pincer grasp is the highlight of fine motor
Parachute 8–9 Persists development during the first year. The infant advances from “raking”
small objects into the palm to the finer pincer grasp, allowing opposi-
tion of the thumb and the index finger, whereby small items are picked
up with precision. Children younger than 18 months of age generally
Gross Motor Skills use both hands equally well, and true “handedness” is not established
One principle in neuromaturational development during infancy is until 36 months (Levine et al. 1999). Advancements in fine motor skills
that it proceeds from cephalad to caudad and proximal to distal. Thus continue throughout the preschool years, when the child develops bet-
arm movement comes before leg movement (Feldman 2007). The up- ter eye-hand coordination with which to stack objects or reproduce
per extremity attains increasing accuracy in reaching, grasping, trans- drawings (e.g., crosses, circles, and triangles). Fig. 2.4 lists and demon-
ferring, and manipulating objects. Gross motor development in the strates the chronologic order of fine motor development.
prone position begins with the infant tightly flexing the upper and
lower extremities and evolves to hip extension while lifting the head
LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT
and shoulders from a table surface around 4 to 6 months of age. When
pulled to a sitting position, the newborn has significant head lag, Delays in language development are more common than delays in any
whereas the 6-month-old baby, because of development of muscle other developmental domain (Glascoe 2000). Language includes re-
tone in the neck, raises the head in anticipation of being pulled up. ceptive and expressive skills. Receptive skills are the ability to under-
Rolling movements start from front to back at approximately stand the language, and expressive skills include the ability to make
4 months of age as the muscles of the lower extremities strengthen. An thoughts, ideas, and desires known to others. Because receptive lan-
infant begins to roll from back to front at about 5 months. The abilities guage precedes expressive language, infants respond to several simple
to sit unsupported (about 6 months old) and to pivot while sitting statements such as “no,” “bye-bye,” and “give me” before they are ca-
(around 9 to 10 months of age) provide increasing opportunities to pable of speaking intelligible words. In addition to speech, expression
manipulate several objects at a time (Needleman 1996). Once thoraco- of language can take the forms of gestures, signing, typing, and “body
lumbar control is achieved and the sitting position mastered, the child language.” Thus speech and language are not synonymous. The
focuses motor development on ambulation and more complex skills. hearing-impaired child or child with cerebral palsy may have normal
Locomotion begins with commando-style crawling, advances to creep- receptive language skills and intellect to understand dialogue but needs
ing on hands and knees, and eventually reaches pulling to stand other forms of expressive language to vocalize responses. Conversely,
around 9 months of age, with further advancement to cruising around children may talk but fail to communicate; for example, a child with
furniture or toys. Standing alone and walking independently occur autism may vocalize by using “parrot talk” or echolalia that has no
around the first birthday. Advanced motor achievements correlate meaningful content and does not represent language.
with increasing myelinization and cerebellum growth. Walking several Language development can be divided into the three stages of pre-
steps alone has one of the widest ranges for mastery of all of the speech, naming, and word combination. Prespeech is characterized by
gross motor milestones and occurs between 9 and 17 months of age. cooing or babbling until around 8 to 10 months of age, when babbling
Milestones of gross motor development are presented in Figs. 2.2 and becomes more complex with multiple syllables. Eventually random
2.3. The accomplishment of locomotion not only expands the infant’s vocalization (“da-da”) is interpreted and reinforced by the parents as a
exploratory range and offers new opportunities for cognitive and real word and the child begins to repeat it. The naming period (ages
motor growth, but it also increases the potential for physical dangers 10 to 18 months) is when the infant realizes that people have names
(Vaughan 1992). and objects have labels. Once the infant’s vocalizations are reinforced
Most children walk with a mature gait, run steadily, and balance on as people or things, the infant begins to use them appropriately.
one foot for 1 second by 3½ years of age. The sequence for additional At around 12 months of age, some infants understand as many as
gross motor development is as follows: running, jumping on two feet, 100 words and can respond to simple commands that are accompanied
balancing on one foot, hopping, and skipping. Finally, more complex by gestures. Early into the second year, a command without a gesture
activities such as throwing, catching, and kicking balls; riding bicycles; is understood. Expressive language is slower, and an 18-month-old
and climbing on playground equipment are mastered. Development child has a limited vocabulary of around 25 words. After the realization
beyond walking incorporates improved balance and coordination and that words can stand for things, the child’s vocabulary expands at a
progressive narrowing of additional physical support. Complex motor rapid pace. Preschool language development begins with word combi-
skills also incorporate advanced cognitive and emotional development nation at 18 to 24 months and is the foundation for later success in
CHAPTER 2 Behavioral Development 15
5 Years
• Gallops 10 feet smoothly and
even
• Hops on either foot 8–10
times
• Throws a ball to a target
overhand and underhand
3 months
A B
6 months
C D E
9 months
F G H
18 months
12 months
I J
K
Fig. 2.3 Abnormal Developmental Findings. A, Difficulty lifting head and stiff legs with little or no movement.
B, Pushing back with head, keeping hands fisted, and lacking arm movement. C, Rounded back, inability to
lift head up, and poor head control. D, Difficulty bringing arms forward to reach out, arching back, and stiffen-
ing legs. E, Arms held back and stiff legs. F, Using one hand predominantly; rounded back and poor use of
arms when sitting. G, Difficulty crawling and using only one side of the body to move. H, Unable to straighten
back and cannot bear weight on legs. I, Difficulty getting to standing position because of stiff legs and pointed
toes; only using arms to pull up to standing. J, Sitting with weight to one side and strongly flexed or stiffly
extended arms; using hand to maintain seated position. K, Inability to take steps independently, poor stand-
ing balance, many falls, and walking on toes. (Redrawn from What every parent should know [pamphlet],
school. Vocabulary increases from 50 to 100 words to more than 2000 Language is a critical barometer of both cognitive and emotional
words during this time. Sentence structure advances from two- and development (Coplan 1995). Mental retardation may first surface as a
three-word phrases to sentences incorporating all of the major gram- concern with delayed speech and language development around
matic rules. A simple correlate is that a child should increase the num- 2 years of age; however, the average age of diagnosis is 3 to 4 years. All
ber of words in a sentence with advancing age—for example, two- children whose language development is delayed should undergo au-
word sentences by 2 years of age, three-word sentences by age 3 years, diologic testing. If a child’s expressive skills are advanced compared
and so on (Table 2.3). with his or her receptive skills (e.g., child speaks five-word sentences
CHAPTER 2 Behavioral Development 17
18 Months
3–4 Months • Turns pages of thick book
• Brings hands together • Accurately inserts two shapes into
• Moves thumb out of palm shape sorter
• Brings object to mouth • Holds crayon with fisted position
• Reaches toward center for • Picks up small objects using neat
a toy pincer grasp to place in container
• In supported sitting, • Uses two hands together at
visually follows objects center of body
• Uses each hand for a different
function
24 Months
5–6 Months • Stacks six cubes
• Reaches across center of • Inserts three shapes in shape
body sorter
• Brings hands together to • Imitates vertical stroke
play • Holds crayon with thumb and
• Reaches with one hand at a fingers pointing toward paper,
time to grasp toy palm down
• Holds and shakes rattle
3 Years
• Imitates horizontal and vertical
strokes
• Copies a circle
• Builds 10-cube tower
7–8 Months • Matches simple shapes
• Bangs object on table • Colors within large pictures and
surface shapes
• Grasps small objects • Holds a crayon with fingers
using a raking motion straight, thumb pointed toward
• May begin grasp with paper
thumb opposed to the • Snips with scissors
index and middle fingers
• Transfers objects from 4 Years
hand to hand • Uses scissors to cut paper in
two pieces
• Cuts on a 5-inch line
• Copies cross
9–10 Months • Traces lines
• Uses pincer grasp • Holds crayon using a three-finger
(grasping with pads of grasp (thumb, index, and middle
thumb and index finger) finger)
• Holds sippy cup • Demonstrates hand preference
• Uses control to let go of
objects 5 Years
• Takes objects out of • Cuts simple shapes with accuracy
container (circle, square)
• Claps hands • Copies square
• Bangs toys/objects • Uses mature grasp on pencils
together • Prints name
• Imitates six-cube block design
• Folds paper in half
but does not understand simple commands), a pervasive development and doubt and corresponds to Freud’s anal stage. A sense of either
disorder could be the cause. identity or role confusion corresponds to the crisis experienced in
Freud’s genital stage (puberty) (Table 2.4).
Piaget’s name is synonymous with the study of cognitive develop-
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT ment. A central tenet of his theory is that cognition is qualitatively
The concept of a developmental line implies that a child passes different at different stages of development (Hobson 1985). During
through successive stages. The psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund the sensorimotor stage, children learn basic things about their rela-
Freud and Erik Erikson and the cognitive theory of Jean Piaget de- tionship with their environment. Thoughts about the nature of ob-
scribe stages in the development of cognition and emotion that are jects and their relationships are acted out and tied immediately to
as qualitatively different as the milestones attained in gross motor sensations and manipulation. With the arrival of language, the nature
development. of thinking changes dramatically, and symbols increasingly take the
At the core of Freudian theory is the idea of biologically deter- place of things and actions. Stages of preoperational thinking, con-
mined drives. The core drive is sexual, broadly defined to include crete operations, and formal operations correspond to the different
sensations that include excitation or tension and satisfaction or release ages of preschool, school age, and adolescence, respectively. At all
(Freud 1952). There are discrete stages: oral, anal, oedipal, latent, and stages, children are not passive recipients of knowledge but actively
genital. During these stages the focus of the sexual drive shifts with seek out experiences (assimilation) and use them to build on how
maturation and is at first influenced primarily by the parents and sub- things work.
sequently by an enlarging circle of social contacts. Defense mecha- Cognitive development and neuromaturational development are
nisms in early childhood can develop pathologically to disguise the closely related, and it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between the
presence of conflict. The emotional health of the child and adult de- two in the infant and child. Early in the neonatal period, cognitive
pends on the resolution of the conflicts that arise throughout these development begins when the infant responds to visual and auditory
stages. stimuli by interacting with surroundings to gain information. Activi-
Erikson’s (1963) chief contribution was to recast Freud’s stages in ties such as mouthing, shaking, and banging objects provide informa-
terms of the emerging personality. For example, basic trust, the first of tion to the infant beyond the visual features. Infant exploration begins
Erickson’s psychosocial stages, develops as infants learn that their ur- with the body, with activities such as staring intently at a hand and
gent needs are met regularly. The consistent availability of a trusted touching other body parts. These explorations represent an early dis-
adult creates the conditions for secure attachment. The next stage es- covery of “cause and effect,” as the infant learns that voluntary move-
tablishes the child’s internal sense of either autonomy versus shame ments generate predictable tactile and visual sensations (e.g., kicking
TABLE 2.4 Classic Stage Theories of the Development of Emotion and Cognition
3–6 Years 6–12 Years 12–20 Years
Theory 0–1 Years (Infancy) 2–3 Years (Toddler) (Preschool) (School Age) (Adolescents)
Freud: psychosexual Oral Anal Oedipal phallic Latency Puberty and genital
Erikson: psychosocial Basic trust Autonomy vs. shame and doubt Initiative vs. guilt Industry vs. inferiority Identity vs. role confusion
Piaget: cognitive Sensorimotor (stages I–IV) Sensorimotor (stages V and VI) Preoperational Concrete operational Formal operational
Egocentric thought
CHAPTER 2 Behavioral Development 19
spasticity are early rolling, pulling to a direct stand at 4 months of age, dysmorphic features can be found by examining the head, hands,
and walking on the toes. Persistent closing of fists beyond 3 months of and skin.
age could be the earliest indication of neuromotor dysfunction. An
afebrile 2-month-old baby with tachypnea, rales, audible murmur, and
failure to gain weight should raise concerns about a significant cardiac NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING AS A TOOL FOR
lesion and the need for a cardiac consultation. A 7-month-old infant ASSESSING THE NEURODEVELOPMENTAL EFFECTS
with poor head control who is unable to sit without support or to lift
his or her chest off the table in the prone position may indicate hypo-
OF ANESTHESIA
tonia and a possible neuromuscular disorder. Spontaneous postures, The earliest studies attempting to elucidate any risks of anesthesia ex-
such as “frog legging” when prone or scissoring, may provide visual posure on young children were limited in outcomes. These studies
physical clues of hypotonia or spasticity, respectively. At 9 months of tended to focus on achievement/presence of a learning disability or IQ
age, the child should stand erect on a parent’s lap or cruise around of- scores. However, such outcome measures may not be the most sensitive
fice furniture, and the 12-month-old child will want to get down and to subtle insult/injury in the brain (Lezak et al. 2012).
walk. Weakness in the 3- or 4-year-old child may be best discovered by Assessment of neurocognitive functioning requires a solid under-
observing the quality of stationary posture and transition movements. standing of both psychometrics and developmental needs related to
The Gowers sign (arising from sitting on the floor to standing using assessment (Lezak et al. 2012; Baron 2018; Sattler 2018; Anderson et al.
the hands to “walk up” the legs) is a classic example of pelvic girdle and 2019). These nuanced challenges are typically best understood by a
quadriceps muscular weakness. Fine motor evaluation can be easily pediatric neuropsychologist with expertise and training in these do-
evaluated by handing the infant a tongue depressor or toy. The new- mains (Lezak et al. 2012). The rapidly changing abilities in a child from
born infant should grasp it reflexively; by 4 months of age, the infant birth to age 18 preclude the use of a single measure or measures across
should reach and retain the object, and by the age of 6 months, the all time points. For example, measures of executive functioning look
child can transfer an object from hand to hand. The development of different for an 8-year-old, whose frontal lobes are not yet fully devel-
fine pincer grasp by 12 months of age allows the child to pick up small oped, and a 14-year-old, who would be expected to engage more easily
objects with precision and increases the risk for foreign body aspira- in problem-solving activities and thinking ahead (Baron 2018). Thus
tion. The observation of a child who constantly uses one hand while an expert with understanding of the challenges of pediatric cognitive
neglecting the other should prompt the clinician to examine the con- assessment can best determine an appropriate outcome battery.
tralateral upper extremity for weakness associated with hemiparesis. In identifying appropriate outcome measures, it is important to
Abnormal head size, significant weight gain or loss, and short stat- assess all possible neuropsychological domains that may be applicable.
ure may be indicative of genetic concerns. The presence of three or The next section describes each primary neurocognitive domain and
more dysmorphic features should raise concerns of a syndrome with includes a table of assessments (Table 2.5) useful for assessing each
possible difficult airway or cardiac issues. Almost 75% of superficial domain. It should be noted that this table is not comprehensive,
Executive Functioning
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System The D-KEFS is a collection of executive functioning measures designed to assess cognitive flexibility, response
(D-KEFS)/81 yrs (Delis et al. 2001) inhibition, problem solving, and planning. Many of the measures are based on more “classic” tests, such as
the original Trail Making Test and Stroop test, but break down these measures so that subcomponents, such
as attention, visual scanning, and processing speed, can be parsed out from the more complex function.
NEPSY, 2nd ed. (NEPSY-II)/3–16 yrs The NEPSY-II is a broadband neuropsychological measure designed to assess many aspects of cognition. It has
(Korkman et al. 2007) a variety of subtests that specifically target attention and executive functioning, designed to be applicable to
children as young as 3. For example, the Statue subtest is able to assess motor persistence and inhibition by
asking a child to maintain a specific position with eyes closed while ignoring sound distracters.
Trail Making Test (TMT)/71 yrs (Reitan 1971) The TMT was originally part of the Halstead Reitan battery. This test assesses visual scanning, attention,
cognitive flexibility, and fine motor skills. There is a separate version for children ages 7–14.
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive The BRIEF-2 includes parent, teacher, and self-report versions of a questionnaire designed to assess execu-
Functioning, 2nd ed. (BRIEF-2)/5–18 yrs tive functioning including emotional, behavioral, and cognitive regulation. Older versions of the original
(Gioia et al. 2015) BRIEF are available for assessing preschool-aged children and transition-aged adolescents.
Emotion/Behavior
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)/1.5–18 yrs The CBCL is one of the most commonly used measures to assess for both internalizing (anxiety, depression)
(Achenbach and Rescorla 2001) and externalizing (ADHD, oppositionality) challenges in children and adolescents. The measure includes
parallel forms for parents, teachers, and the children themselves with items pertaining to a wide variety
of behavioral challenges, including those specifically meant to represent symptoms from specific diagnoses
included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM).
Behavior Assessment System for Children, The BASC-3, similar to the CBCL, is a measure that assess both internalizing and externalizing symptoms
3rd ed. (BASC-3)/2–25 yrs (Reynolds 2015) in children and adolescents. The measure can be completed by parents, teachers, or the child, and includes
a variety of internal validity measures in addition to behavioral scales.
22 PART 1 Basic Principles and Physiology
because many more tests are available. However, these are some of the children (Anderson et al. 2019). Additionally, the relevance of execu-
most commonly used measures. tive functioning measures to real-world abilities has been called into
question (Burgess et al. 2006). However, the use of laboratory mea-
Neuropsychological Domains sures in combination with questionnaires designed to tap daily func-
Intelligence tioning has been suggested for a more ecologically valid assessment
Intelligence is a general overall ability indicator. It is not necessarily (Gioia and Isquith 2004).
sensitive to subtle CNS damage in itself. Indeed, seminal studies have
demonstrated that IQ may not be affected by subtle acquired brain Sensorimotor
injury. However, an intelligence score provides a gross global starting Sensorimotor tests refer to assessment of both motor skills and aspects
point from which the neuropsychologist can interpret patterns (Lezak of sensation that apply to brain function (Lezak et al. 2012; Baron
et al. 2012). 2018). Motor measures may speak to speed, motor overflow, motor
coordination, and balance skills (Baron 2018). Sensory measures may
Speech and Language pertain to tactile discrimination and smell. Documentation of motor
Speech is the motor aspect of communication, whereas language refers skills may involve lateralization and localization of brain dysfunction
to meaningful communication itself (Lezak et al. 2012; Baron 2018). (Lezak et al. 2012). Similarly, smell identification tests are useful in
Language can be broken down into multiple subcomponents. It con- identifying brain injury (Bakker et al. 2016) but are less likely useful
tains the basic aspects of receptive and expressive communication and for targeting more subtle brain damage. Most neuropsychological
more nuanced, higher-level skills such as grammar, syntax, and word examinations include some measure of psychomotor functioning. (See
finding (Baron 2018). Table 2.5.)
Visual-Spatial Skills
ANESTHETIC NEUROTOXICITY
Visual-spatial skills include visual-perceptual, visual-spatial, and visual-
constructional skills. These domains represent a child’s ability to per- Data regarding the potential neurotoxicologic effects of anesthetic
ceive the world around them, relationships in space between objects, agents on the immature brain have generated great interest and con-
and the ability to integrate what the hand does with what the eyes see cern and led to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning
(Baron 2018). These tests usually involve a variety of visual stimuli and against prolonged anesthetic exposure in young children. The phe-
graphomotor measures completed by the child. nomenon of anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity was first identified in
rodent models nearly two decades ago. Since then, convincing evidence
Attention and Processing Speed that anesthetics interfere with neurodevelopment has emerged in vari-
Attention is a base skill necessary for engaging in other cognitive ous preclinical animal models. Translating such findings to humans,
functions (Baron 2018). Although attention may seem a simple term however, has been challenging given that a child’s need for anesthesia
at first glance, it is quite complex when broken down (Scott 2011). and surgery is inevitably linked to various medical comorbidities.
Baron (2018) reviewed the evidence for defining attention based on Each year, approximately 1.2 million children in the United States
its subcomponents. It is a complex domain including selective atten- under 5 years of age undergo ambulatory surgery, and another 144,000
tion, divided attention, shifting attention, and executive attentional children of the same age undergo inpatient surgery (Rabbitts 2010;
control. These subdomains relate to a child’s ability to focus on cer- Tzong et al. 2012). Concern for the potential neurotoxicity of anes-
tain information, ignore other stimuli, focus for longer periods of thetic agents in the developing brain first emerged when immature
time, focus on two targets simultaneously, and so forth (Baron 2018). rodents, exposed to a cocktail of commonly used anesthetic agents,
Processing speed is a more straightforward concept related to how fast developed neuronal apoptosis in the brain and subsequently demon-
a child can think. Because measures of processing speed typically tap strated functional behavioral deficits in adulthood (Jevtovic-Todorovic
another skill at the same time (e.g., language, fine motor skills), how- et al. 2003). Since then, the concept of anesthetic neurotoxicity has been
ever, obtaining a “pure” measure of processing speed is challenging explored in hundreds of preclinical animal studies, and the association
(Anderson et al. 2019). between anesthetic exposure during neurodevelopment and subse-
quent histologic and cognitive and behavioral abnormalities has been
Learning and Memory confirmed in a variety of animal models, from worms to nonhuman
Learning and memory encompass a child’s ability to encode, consoli- primates (Loepke and Soriano 2008; Vutskits and Xie 2016). Other
date, and recall information (Anderson et al. 2019). Typically, neuro- potential mechanisms of toxicity, beyond apoptosis, have also been
psychological tests evaluate these skills for both verbal and visual explored and identified. Although there is convincing evidence that
information. Memory measures are designed to ascertain challenges in anesthetic exposure is detrimental to neurodevelopment in animals,
any aspect of the memory system, thought to be primarily housed in translating these findings to humans has been challenging. The chal-
the medial temporal lobe (Anderson et al. 2019). There are also some lenges stem from differences in brain development between species,
measures, geared toward older adolescents, that assess functional, daily marked dissimilarities between dosage and duration of exposure in the
memory. preclinical setting versus the clinical context, an incomplete under-
standing of the window of vulnerability in children, and a poorly
Executive Functioning defined phenotype of injury in humans.
Executive functioning is an umbrella term that covers higher-order In the face of these challenges, a number of clinical studies have
thinking skills such as problem-solving, planning, and organizing explored the association between anesthetic exposure in children and
(Baron 2018). These skills are also involved in emotion and behavior subsequent neurodevelopmental deficit. The vast majority of these
regulation (Anderson et al. 2019), and the primary brain areas thought studies have been observational in nature and, as such, have been un-
to be responsible for such skills are the frontal lobes (Baron 2018). able to establish a causal relationship. Despite these obstacles, in 2016
Executive functions are considered more complex skills that emerge the FDA released a warning against “repeated or lengthy (.3 hours)
with age (Baron 2018), and thus limited measures exist for younger use of anesthetic and sedation drugs during surgeries or procedures in
CHAPTER 2 Behavioral Development 23
children younger than 3 years or in pregnant women during their third anesthetic agents, durations of exposure, and outcome measures
trimester” (FDA Drug Safety Communication 2016). (Istaphanous and Loepke 2009). Virtually all of the commonly used
anesthetic agents have been shown to elicit such neurotoxicologic re-
Brief Evidence From Preclinical Models sponses in animal studies (Istaphanous and Loepke 2009).
The deleterious effect of anesthetics on the developing brain was The majority of rodent exposure paradigms have focused on post-
assessed in seminal studies of MK801, a ketamine-like, N-methyl- natal day 7. This is because synaptogenesis peaks on day of life 7 in
d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, and ethanol, a known rodents, and this time point has been shown to be the period of great-
NMDA antagonist and g-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mimetic agent est vulnerability (Rice and Barone 2000; Yon et al. 2005; Sanno et al.
(Ikonomidou et al. 1999, 2000; Jevtovic-Todorovic et al. 2003). These 2010). However, critics have raised concern regarding the clinical rel-
early studies, which demonstrated widespread apoptotic cell death in evance of this age, given that the 7-day-old mouse or rat translates
the immature rodent brain after exposure, raised concern for the neu- roughly to a prenatal time point during human gestation or one that
rodevelopmental consequences of perinatal drug use and provided a approximates that of a full-term infant (Istaphanous and Loepke
potential explanation for the decreased brain size and behavioral ab- 2009). Furthermore, the period of vulnerability in rodents has been
normalities seen with fetal alcohol syndrome (Ikonomidou et al. 1999, defined largely on the basis of induced apoptosis and neurodegenera-
2000). Subsequently, it was found that exposure to anesthetics with tion in the immature brain (Rice and Barone 2000; Yon et al. 2005;
NMDA antagonist and/or GABAA agonist properties also triggered Sanno et al. 2010). Thus it has been challenging to meaningfully trans-
widespread apoptotic cell death at a critical time point during rodent late the findings in rodents to infants and children.
neurodevelopment (Jevtovic-Todorovic et al. 2003). Although the A major advance within the field over the last several years has been
mechanisms of neurotoxicity are unknown, it has been proposed that the emergence of studies using nonhuman primates. Employing such
the process may be mediated by the oxidative stress–associated mito- a robust model carries significance because neurodevelopment at birth
chondrial apoptosis pathway (Olney et al. 2004; Yon et al. 2005; Zhang is similar between nonhuman primates and human infants (Vutskits
et al. 2010; Bai et al. 2013; Boscolo et al. 2013). and Davidson 2017). Furthermore, a clinical anesthetic can be well
modeled in the infant monkey, and physiologic parameters can be as-
Proposed Mechanisms of Neurotoxicity sessed and homeostasis can be maintained (Vutskits and Davidson
Anesthetic agents cause oxidative stress within the cell by inducing 2017). In nonhuman primate work, infant rhesus macaques were ex-
reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation within mitochondria (Zhang posed to sevoflurane for 4 hours on days of life 6 to 10 followed by
et al. 2010; Bai 2013). ROS produced during exposure to anesthetics subsequent exposures on days of life 14 and 28. The monkeys demon-
permit cytochrome c mobilization from the inner mitochondrial strated increased anxiety compared with controls that underwent
membrane (Kapetanaki et al. 2009). Simultaneously, the outer mito- maternal separation (Raper et al. 2015). In other work, infant rhesus
chondrial membrane becomes permeable following GABAA receptor macaques were exposed to isoflurane for 5 hours on days of life 6, 9,
stimulation and NMDA receptor antagonism (Olney et al. 2004). The and 12 and demonstrated motor reflex deficits at 1 month of age and
combination of these factors permits cytochrome c release into the increased anxiety at 12 months of age (Coleman et al. 2017). Impor-
cytosol and initiates a cascade of cellular events that ultimately leads to tantly, there were no significant effects of a single isoflurane exposure
apoptotic neuronal cell death (Olney et al. 2004). (Coleman et al. 2017). These investigations are important because they
Although much of the neurotoxicity work has focused on oxidative suggest that multiple exposures to a volatile anesthetic, at a critical
stress and apoptosis, it is now understood that other mechanisms may time during development, may impact long-term neurodevelopment.
be involved. These include abnormalities of NMDA and/or GABA re-
ceptor expression, activity, and signaling; alterations in brain trophic Problems With Translating to Humans
and growth factor production and signaling; neuroinflammation; and Attempts to translate findings from preclinical investigations of
dysregulation of other growth and survival pathways (Olney et al. anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity in the developing animal brain to
2004; Vutskits et al. 2006; Johnson et al. 2008; Bai et al. 2013; Erasso humans have been limited, for several reasons (Mintz et al. 2012).
et al. 2013; Hofacer et al. 2013; Olsen and Brambrink 2013; Ma et al. First, the anesthetic dosage and durations of exposure in animal stud-
2016). Furthermore, other downstream developmental processes such ies often exceed clinically relevant concentrations and length of time.
as synaptogenesis, neurogenesis, and dendritic branching may become Second, the differences in timing and rates of brain maturation across
disrupted (Olney et al. 2004; Vutskits et al. 2006; Johnson et al. 2008; species make comparisons to human development difficult. Third,
Bai et al. 2013; Erasso et al. 2013; Hofacer et al. 2013; Olsen and assessment of neurodevelopmental outcome in most animal species
Brambrink 2013; Ma et al. 2016). Recent evidence also suggests delete- fails to provide meaningful information regarding the complexities of
rious effects of anesthetics on developing neuronal circuits, synapse higher-order cognitive function in children (van Loo and Martens
density and neurotransmission, and the number of mitochondria in 2007; Istaphanous et al. 2010; Mintz et al. 2012; Workman et al. 2013).
the synaptic terminal (Vutskits and Davidson 2017). Finally, in vivo histologic assessment of the brain in children follow-
ing anesthetic exposure is not possible. Thus investigators have not
Neurocognitive Effects in Rodents and Nonhuman been able to prove that anesthesia-induced neuronal apoptosis or
Primates other histopathology actually occurs in humans (Mintz et al. 2012).
In 2003, the first preclinical study evaluating long-term neurocognitive
outcome in rodents following newborn anesthetic exposure was pub- Observational Studies in Children
lished (Jevtovic-Todorovic et al. 2003). In this work, 7-day-old rats Due to the significant costs and challenges of performing prospective
were exposed to a combination of midazolam, nitrous oxide, and iso- studies of anesthetic neurotoxicity, the vast majority of studies have
flurane for 6 hours. The rats demonstrated impairments in synaptic been observational in nature, comparing children exposed to surgery
function within the hippocampus and displayed persistent cognitive and anesthesia with those not exposed at all. The challenge with inter-
defects as juveniles and young adults several weeks following exposure preting this type of study, however, is that the impact of anesthesia
(Jevtovic-Todorovic et al. 2003). Since then, numerous studies have exposure cannot be isolated from the operative procedure or the surgi-
corroborated these findings in both mice and rats using different cal experience. Since children who need surgery typically undergo a
24 PART 1 Basic Principles and Physiology
procedure to address some underlying medical condition, adequately cohort compared with unexposed children (O’Leary et al. 2016). How-
controlling for such confounding variables can be difficult. Further- ever, a follow-up study identified 2346 sibling pairs from Ontario who
more, most of the observational studies were performed using preex- were discordant for anesthesia exposure before 5 years of age and
isting data sets. Whereas observational studies using preexisting data found no statistically significant increased risk of EDI deficit (O’Leary
can increase efficiency in generating results, interpretations are limited et al. 2019).
by the availability of data. A number of studies originating in the United States have also used
Interpretation of the many observational studies of anesthetic neu- academic achievement as an outcome measure. One investigation from
rotoxicity has been challenged by the amount of heterogeneity in the Iowa studied 113 children who were exposed to anesthesia for circum-
methodology used. Differences in the patient populations evaluated, cision, pyloromyotomy, or inguinal hernia repair before the age of 1
types of procedures performed, age at exposure, anesthetic dosage and (Block et al. 2012). In this study, anesthetic-exposed children were
durations, age at evaluation, outcome measures assessed, and chosen found to have academic achievement scores that were lower than ex-
comparison groups make analysis of the data as a whole and compari- pected based on the population norms (Block et al. 2012). However,
sons between studies difficult. Despite these limitations, however, the results were no longer significant after excluding children with
some interpretation is possible. A reasonable approach to reviewing underlying CNS problems (Block et al. 2012). In a study from the
this literature is to categorize the investigations based on the outcome Mayo Clinic, 350 children from Minnesota exposed to anesthesia for
measure used. surgery before 2 years of age were evaluated using academic achieve-
ment testing and assessment for learning disability (Flick et al. 2011).
Academic Achievement Outcomes in children with a single anesthetic exposure did not differ
Given the fact that educational databases are readily available in mul- from unexposed children; however, children with multiple exposures
tiple countries around the world, a large number of studies have uti- demonstrated a higher risk of developing a learning disability (Flick
lized academic achievement and teacher evaluations as a primary et al. 2011).
outcome measure of neurodevelopment in a variety of different pa- In a study from Singapore, 100 children who were exposed to anes-
tient populations. In a study of 110 monozygotic twins from the Neth- thesia for minor surgery were compared with an unexposed group
erlands, children exposed to anesthesia for surgery before 3 years of (Bong et al. 2013). In this study, no differences in the Primary School
age were compared with their unexposed twin siblings. In this twin Leaving Examination academic assessment were found between co-
study, no differences in standardized tests and teacher ratings at horts at 12 years of age; however, a higher risk of learning disability
12 years of age were found based on anesthesia exposure (Bartels et al. was detected in the exposed group (Bong et al. 2013). In an Australian
2009). This study is interesting because it is the only work to compare study focusing on a birth cohort from Perth, 781 children were as-
monozygotic twins who were discordant for anesthesia exposure. In sessed using a wide range of outcomes such as academic achievement,
another investigation, children in Denmark were evaluated using a ICD-9 coded clinical diagnoses, and directly assessed neuropsycho-
national database. In this study, 2689 Danish children exposed to an- logical tests (Ing et al. 2014a). Although anesthetic exposed children
esthesia for inguinal hernia repair before 1 year of age were compared were found to have an increased risk of deficits in neuropsychological
with a random sampling of 5% of the population, and no differences testing and an increased risk of an ICD-9 coded clinical diagnosis, no
were found in nationwide standardized test scores obtained at 15 to differences in academic achievement were found (Ing et al. 2014a).
16 years of age (Hansen et al. 2011). The same Danish database was used In summary, the vast majority of studies of anesthetic neurotoxic-
to evaluate another group of children who underwent pyloromyotomy ity in children that have used academic achievement or teacher evalu-
at #3 months of age and also found no difference in standardized test ations as outcome measures have shown either a marginal effect or no
scores between cohorts (Hansen et al. 2013). A study from Sweden that effect at all. In a few studies, other outcomes were evaluated in addition
evaluated 33,514 children who experienced a single anesthetic exposure to academic achievement scores. In those studies, no differences in
before the age of 4, without being admitted to the hospital, found that academic achievement were identified, but differences between co-
anesthetic-exposed children had lower test scores compared with unex- horts were found with regard to learning disability, neuropsychological
posed children (Glatz et al. 2017). However, the difference was quite testing, and the presence of ICD-9 coded clinical diagnoses. Although
small relative to other factors such as sex and maternal education level the latter group of studies raises questions about the presence of subtle
(Glatz et al. 2017). However, a subset of anesthesia-exposed boys from differences in specific neurodevelopmental domains between groups
this study were found to have scored lower on a military enlistment IQ of children, these investigations are reassuring given that school per-
test compared with unexposed boys (Glatz et al. 2017). formance appears to be generally unaffected by anesthetic exposure,
Other research that originated in Canada, evaluating children who particularly a single exposure.
underwent surgery and anesthesia exposure prior to 4 years of age,
utilized the Early Development Instrument (EDI), a questionnaire Learning Disability
completed by each child’s kindergarten teacher (Graham et al. 2016). Learning disability is defined using academic achievement scores and
In a study from Manitoba, 4470 exposed children were evaluated and IQ testing and has been used as an outcome measure in a number of
found to have lower scores than unexposed children (Graham et al. clinical studies assessing for anesthetic neurotoxicity (Beers et al.
2016). Interestingly, this study found that children who were exposed 2014). In a study from Rochester, Minnesota, children with single and
between the ages of 2 and 4 years had worse scores than children who multiple exposures to anesthesia were evaluated (Wilder et al. 2009).
were exposed between birth and 2 years of age. One reason for this Those exposed to anesthesia for surgery before 4 years of age were
difference is that the older exposed cohort received general anesthesia found to have an increased risk of learning disability following 2 or
for dental procedures (Graham et al. 2016). It is well known that chil- more exposures; however, no such risk was detected following a single
dren who require anesthesia for such procedures often have preexisting exposure (Wilder et al. 2009) (Fig. 2.5). One limitation of this work is
neurobehavioral problems. Another study from Ontario used the same that the children included in the study were born between 1976 and
EDI outcome assessment in 28,366 children who underwent surgery 1982 (Wilder et al. 2009), and a vast majority of the children were
before the age of 5 (O’Leary et al. 2016). This work found a statistically exposed to halothane, an anesthetic agent no longer commonly
significant increase in deficit (as measured by EDI) in the exposed used today. A follow-up study, evaluating a cohort of children born in
CHAPTER 2 Behavioral Development 25
None exposures (Tsai et al. 2018). Importantly, the latter study employed a
diagnosis (%)
R. T., Flick, R. P., Sprung, J., Katusic, S. K., Barbaresi, W. J., Mickelson, C.,
et al. (2009). Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a
et al. 2012). However, in this work, not all cognitive domains were af-
population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology, 110, 796–804.) fected and there were no differences in behavior and motor function
(Ing et al. 2017b). A limitation of this study was that these children
were born between 1989 and 1992, and the vast majority received
Minnesota between 1996 to 2000, was performed to address this limi- halothane, an antiquated inhalational anesthetic (Ing et al. 2017b).
tation using a similar experimental methodologic approach (Hu et al. Of the studies that incorporated neuropsychological testing, two
2017). In this study, 72% of children received sevoflurane, and a simi- large-scale ambidirectional studies have been performed. An ambidi-
lar association between anesthetic exposure and learning disability was rectional study is one that retrospectively identifies children who re-
identified (Hu et al. 2017). Similarly, in a work from Singapore, chil- ceived surgery and anesthesia in the past and then brings them into a
dren who underwent anesthesia exposure for minor procedures were testing facility for prospective testing. The benefit of this type of study
found to have an increased risk of learning disability compared with compared with a traditional prospective study is that subjects are old
unexposed children (Bong et al. 2013). Although this finding was con- enough for neuropsychological testing at the time of study enrollment,
sistent with the results from Minnesota, the definition of learning thus reducing the amount of time needed to perform the study. The
disability differed between the studies. Overall, however, learning dis- first study published using this approach was the multicenter Pediatric
ability has been found to be associated, to some degree, with exposure Anesthesia Neurodevelopment Assessment (PANDA) study, which
to anesthesia and surgery, particularly following multiple exposures. A evaluated 105 healthy children exposed to anesthesia for hernia repair
major caveat, though, is that the term “learning disability” has not been before age 3 (Sun et al. 2016). In order to control for sociodemo-
consistently defined between studies. graphic and parental variables, exposed children were compared with
their unexposed siblings (Sun et al. 2016). Children were evaluated
Clinical Diagnoses of Developmental and Psychiatric between 8 and 15 years of age and a range of outcomes were measured
Disorders by neuropsychologists and reported by caregivers (Sun et al. 2016). No
Clinical diagnoses of developmental and psychiatric disorders are differences were found in the primary outcome of IQ or in the major-
typically made by medical providers and recorded either in healthcare ity of secondary outcomes (Sun et al. 2016). Differences were identified
administrative databases or research databases. In a study using the in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) surveys, however, in which parents
New York State Medicaid healthcare administrative data set, a cohort reported more behavioral problems in anesthetic-exposed children
of 383 children exposed to anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair before (Sun et al. 2016).
the age of 3 years was identified and compared with children without A second investigation that utilized an ambidirectional approach
surgery (DiMaggio et al. 2009). Children in this cohort who were ex- was the Mayo Anesthesia Safety in Kids (MASK) study, which enrolled
posed to anesthetic and surgery had an increased risk of an ICD-9 380 children exposed to a single anesthetic, 206 children exposed to
coded diagnosis for developmental delay or behavioral disorder multiple anesthetics, and 411 children without any anesthetic exposure
(DiMaggio et al. 2009). A larger study of a cohort of children enrolled (Warner et al. 2018). No differences were found in the primary out-
in Medicaid in Texas and New York evaluated 38,493 children who come of IQ or a range of other secondary outcomes (Warner et al.
underwent a single common pediatric surgical procedure (Ing et al. 2018). However, differences in processing speed and fine motor ability
2017a). In this investigation, a single exposure was associated specifi- were detected in children with multiple exposures (Warner et al. 2018).
cally with an increased risk of a mental disorder diagnosis and an In addition, parents reported differences in executive function as mea-
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis (ADHD) (Ing et al. sured by the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)
2017a). In a study of 350 Minnesota children exposed to anesthesia and behavior as measured by the CBCL in children with single and
before 2 years of age, those with multiple exposures had an increased multiple exposures (Warner et al. 2018). In a follow-up cluster analysis
risk of ADHD, whereas no such risk was found following a single ex- of the children in the MASK cohort, only 23.3% of multiply exposed
posure (Sprung et al. 2012). Importantly, these findings were con- children grouped into a cluster of patients with overall lower perfor-
firmed in subsequent work assessing a more modern cohort of chil- mance in most neuropsychological tests (Zaccariello et al. 2019).
dren (Hu et al. 2017). Two studies have been published using a national This implies that children who received multiple anesthetics are not
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
blessé !… Comme m’adressant à moi-même, je me contentai de
murmurer : — Est-ce donc pour nous heurter si douloureusement
que nous nous sommes rencontrés ? Le temps s’écoule d’une façon
irréparable et voilà que nous l’employons à nous faire du mal !…
Charles, nous séparerons-nous ainsi ?
Il parut touché. Néanmoins, il se tenait sur la défensive car il
répondit : — Cela dépend de toi. Promets-moi de ne plus faire
aucune allusion au sujet qui nous divise et pendant le peu d’instants
qui nous restent à passer ensemble, je me charge de te prouver que
je t’aime toujours autant.
— Ton âme m’est trop chère pour que j’accepte cette condition,
dis-je en sanglotant, j’aurais beau te promettre mon silence sur ce
point, je sais que je manquerais à mon engagement. Songe, je t’en
conjure, que si je t’obéissais, ce serait, devant Dieu, comme si je
plantais un poteau indicateur, à ton intention, sur la route qui va en
enfer.
— Alors, reprit Charles en se dirigeant vers la la sortie, nous
n’avons plus rien à nous dire… Adieu !
Sur le seuil, il s’arrêta. J’espérais un revirement providentiel.
Mais, avec une inflexion de voix d’une étrange douceur, il dit
simplement : — Prie pour moi, mon ami…!
— Ah ! tu n’avais pas besoin de me le demander !
Et je m’élançai vers lui. Mais déjà, il était de l’autre côté de la
porte et je l’entendis descendre précipitamment l’escalier.
Une heure plus tard, le cœur brisé, l’esprit en désarroi, je quittai
Lyon.
Lapillus.
ARGUMENT