Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RAADS
RAADS
Basic information
Statements: 80
Duration: 10–30 minutes
Type: screening tool
Authors: Riva Ariella Ritvo et al.
Publishing year: 2011
Seminal paper: The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS–
R): A Scale to Assist the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder
in Adults: An International Validation Study (Ritvo et al., 2011)
Original RAADS
Statements: 78
Publishing year: 2008
Seminal paper: A Scale to Assist the Diagnosis of Autism and Asperger’s
Disorder in Adults (RAADS): A Pilot Study (Ritvo et al., 2008)
RAADS–R
The test assesses developmental symptoms correlating with the three DSM-
5 diagnostic categories (Language, Social relatedness, and Sensory–motor), as
well as a fourth subscale, Circumscribed interests. It consists of 80 statements,
giving you 4 choices for each statement:
If you decide to take the test, please consider the Discussion section below.
Scoring
Thresholds
The scoring range of the RAADS–R is 0–240. A score of 65+ indicates you are
likely autistic, as no neurotypical scored above 64 in the research. A score
of <65 means you are likely not autistic. However, note that no single test is
conclusive. For more certainty, we suggest taking a few other autism tests as well.
In the table below, you can see the threshold scores and maximum possible scores
for the subscales of the RAADS–R.
❮
RAADS–R scores
Construct Threshold score Maximum score
Total score 65 240
Language 4 21
Social relatedness 31 117
Sensory–motor 16 60
Circumscribed interests 15 42
❯
To see how your score compares to other people’s, have a look at the Average
scores section. For more information on the RAADS–R subscales, have a look at
the Subscales section below.
Scoring methods
You can take the test using two methods:
Automated-scoring
Paper-based if you want documentation of your answers (you can find the scoring key
at the bottom of the PDF)
Scoring
The scoring of most of the statements (63) is as follows:
However, the point value is reversed for the 17 so-called normative questions:[2]
Below you can see an example of the first 3 questions, the first of which (denoted
by an asterisk) is normative and thus has reversed scoring.
Subscales
Language
The language subscale is made up of 7 statements. The focus of these statements is
on:
Movie talk: Friends notice you’ve heard something new because you start using the
word or phrase regularly.
Small talk: A light conversation about unimportant things that people make during
social interactions—instead of topics that are actually interesting and fun to talk about.
Being literal: Having challenges when ‘what is said’ language does not match ‘what is
meant’ language.
Social relatedness
The social relatedness subscale is made up of 39 statements. The focus of these
statements is on:
Sensory–motor
The sensory–motor subscale is made up of 20 statements. The focus of these
statements is on:
Voice volume challenges: Talking very loud, not loud enough, or significant
fluctuations between the two.
Voice differences: Speaking monotone, like a child, or in silly voices.
Motor control issues: Clumsiness and being uncoordinated.
Sensory: Sensory stimulation that doesn’t bother others can be painful and
overwhelming. The experience can differ significantly at various times or be context-
dependent. You may get anxious when overstimulated.
Circumscribed interests
The circumscribed interests subscale is made up of 14 statements. The focus of
these statements is on:
Details preference: focuses on details before the big picture, but can do both.
Upset when the unexpected occurs: A dislike of someone changing your routine—this
does not mean that you stick to your own routine, just that you dislike someone else
changing YOUR routine.
Special interests: Speaking about them, having them…
Average scores
The table below shows the average total scores and subscores for people taking the
RAADS-R, divided by autistic people, suspected autistic people, and non-autistic
people (neurotypicals).
❮
Average RAADS-R scores
Social Sensory/
Total score Language relatedness motor
Autism threshold 65.0 4.0 31.0 16.0
values
Autistic males 148.6 11.9 71.3 36.7
Autistic females 160.4 12.8 73.5 43.1
Suspected autistic 141.6 11.2 70.0 33.3
males
Suspected autistic 145.2 11.3 67.2 38.7
females
Neurotypical males 84.2 6.6 43.0 19.0
Neurotypical females 91.6 6.8 42.8 24.8
❯
You might ask, “If the threshold score is 65, and no neurotypicals scored higher
than 64 in the research, then why are the average neurotypical scores above 80?”
Excellent question!
The answer is in how the data is being collected. The table above is based on
people taking the RAADS–R online, which for research purposes starts with the
question as to whether you are diagnosed with autism, suspect you’re autistic, or
are not autistic. But some people that answered the latter will—contrary to their
own expectations—end up scoring in the autistic range. Due to this misattribution,
their scores get counted as neurotypical scores despite scoring in the autistic range,
thus skewing the results.
In other words, the average neurotypical scores as reported by the online RAADS–
R (on Aspietests.org) are almost certainly too high. The average scores you can
find in the research literature are more reliable, given that they use genuine
neurotypicals as a control group. In the article below, you can find a table with
average scores that I have taken from the research literature.
Mean scores
Because the table with average scores is based on skewed data, let me also present
the mean scores from Ritvo’s seminal paper:[3]
❮
Mean RAADS–R scores
Social Sensory/
Mean total Range Language relatedness motor
Autistic spectrum (n = 66) 133.83 44–227 11.08 67.89 32.82
Asperger (n = 135) — — 10.06 65.07 28.96
Controls (n = 276) 25.95 0–65 1.86 9.24 5.26
❯
Validity
The RAADS–R is a reliable instrument to assist the diagnosis of autistic adults.[4]
No neurotypical who took the test scored above the autism threshold.
Only 3% of the autistic group did not score over 65.
Test–retest reliability was high, particularly for the autistic group.[5]
❮
RAADS-R validity
Measure Result Meaning
Sensitivity 97% Test’s ability to identify positive results
Specificity 100% Test’s ability to identify negative results
Concurrent validity 96% Test’s validity compared with ADOS Module 4, SRS
Test–retest reliability .987 Test’s agreement between results of successive measurements
❯
Sensitivity
A sensitivity of 97% means that 97% of autistic people who took the test met the
cutoff score and were accurately classified as autistic. Said another way, it
represents the proportion of autistics who were correctly classified as autistic based
on the questionnaire.
In contrast, a 100% specificity score means that all (100% of) the neurotypical
people who took the test were below the cutoff score and were accurately classified
as non-autistic. It represents the proportion of neurotypicals who were correctly
classified as neurotypical based on the questionnaire.
The takeaway is that the RAADS–R has a high probability of accurately classifying
those who take the test as autistic or not autistic.
Also, the RAADS–R standardization study reported that many autism subjects,
particularly those in their late teens and early twenties, failed to acknowledge the
presence of symptoms that their families said were present and which were readily
observed by the diagnostician.[6]
The test has been validated and cited in the medical literature numerous times.
However, as both an autistic and a psychotherapist, I have some concerns with the
RAADS–R:
Quite a few of the statements are not actually characteristic of autism and are likely
going to be experienced as demeaning (e.g. I am NEVER a compassionate type of
person).
A few questions are characteristic of alexithymia rather than autism (e.g. the ones on
lack of compassion and empathy). While alexithymia correlates strongly with autism, it
should not be confused with autism itself.
Two-thirds of autistic adults were incorrectly identified by clinicians when they used this
test, despite the fact that the test has strong validity.[8] I suspect the reason for this is that
the normative questions that indicate what we ought to be like are outdated. I contacted
Dr. Ritvo regarding this, but she has declined to respond.
My test results are above. And it did identify me as autistic, which I am. The test is
based on the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism[9] which views us as having
deficits, deficits, deficits!
I find many of the questions insensitive and lacking in understanding about what is
normative in regards to autistics. The test claims that a clinician ‘ought’ to see the
following characteristics if a person is autistic:
A lack of compassion
A dislike of close friendships
Monotonous speech
An inability to manage small talk.
1. I am a sympathetic person
6. I can “put myself in other people’s shoes”
11. I miss my best friends or family when we are apart for a long time.
18. I understand when friends need to be comforted.
23. Meeting new people is usually easy for me.
26. I like having a conversation with several people, for instance around a dinner table, at
school, or at work.
33. I speak with a normal rhythm.
37. I am an understanding type of person.
43. I like to talk things over with my friends.
47. I feel very comfortable dating or being in social situations with others.
48. I try to be as helpful as I can when other people tell me their personal problems.
53. I am considered a compassionate type of person.
58. I can chat and make small talk with people.
62. I usually speak in a normal tone.
68. I can tell when someone says one thing but means something else.
72. I enjoy spending time eating and talking with my family and friends.
77. I like to have close friends.
These descriptions are so lacking in nuance and are not at all representative of who
I am. This is probably my least favourite autism test for that reason alone.
Kendall:
That said, the test has a close to 100% success rate in differentiating autism from
non-autism, despite these limitations.
The RAADS–R
Please read each statement below and choose the answer that best fits your
experiences during social interactions.
1. I am a sympathetic person.
a. True now and when I was young
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
4. Sometimes I talk too loudly or too softly, and I am not aware of it.
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
7. I have a hard time figuring out what some phrases mean, like 'you
are the apple of my eye.'
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
11. I miss my best friends or family when we are apart for a long time.
d. Never true
13. I only like to think and talk about a few things that interest me.
d. Never true
14. I'd rather go out to eat in a restaurant by myself than with someone
I know.
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
19. I am very sensitive to the way my clothes feel when I touch them.
How they feel is more important to me than how they look.
d. Never true
20. I like to copy the way certain people speak and act. It helps me
appear more normal.
d. Never true
21. It can be very intimidating for me to talk to more than one person
at the same time.
d. Never true
22. I have to 'act normal' to please other people and make them like
me.
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
26. I like having a conversation with several people, for instance
around a dinner table, at school or at work.
d. Never true
27. I take things too literally, so I often miss what people are trying to
say.
d. Never true
d. Never true
29. Some ordinary textures that do not bother others feel very
offensive when they touch my skin.
d. Never true
30. I get extremely upset when the way I like to do things is suddenly
changed.
d. Never true
31. I have never wanted or needed to have what other people call an
'intimate relationship.'
d. Never true
d. Never true
34. The same sound, color or texture can suddenly change from very
sensitive to very dull.
d. Never true
35. The phrase 'I've got you under my skin' makes me uncomfortable.
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
38. I do not connect with characters in movies and cannot feel what
they feel.
d. Never true
d. Never true
40. I can see in my mind in exact detail things that I am interested in.
d. Never true
41. I keep lists of things that interest me, even when they have no
practical use (for example sports statistics, train schedules, calendar
dates, historical facts and dates).
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
45. It can be very hard to read someone's face, hand and body
movements when they are talking.
d. Never true
46. The same thing (like clothes or temperatures) can feel very
different to me at different times.
d. Never true
d. Never true
49. I have been told that I have an unusual voice (for example flat,
monotone, childish, or high-pitched).
d. Never true
d. Never true
51. I do certain things with my hands over and over again (like
flapping, twirling sticks or strings, waving things by my eyes).
d. Never true
52. I have never been interested in what most of the people I know
consider interesting.
d. Never true
54. I get along with other people by following a set of specific rules
that help me look normal.
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
59. Sometimes things that should feel painful are not (for instance
when I hurt myself or burn my hand on the stove).
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
63. I like things to be exactly the same day after day and even small
changes in my routines upset me.
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
66. The phrase, 'He wears his heart on his sleeve,' does not make sense
to me.
d. Never true
68. I can tell when someone says one thing but means something else.
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
71. The same sound sometimes seems very loud or very soft, even
though I know it has not changed.
a. True now and when I was young
d. Never true
72. I enjoy spending time eating and talking with my family and
friends.
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
d. Never true
Score
❮
Meaning of RAADS–R scores
Score Interpretation
25 You are not autistic.
50 Some autistic traits, but likely not autistic (yet some autistic people score as low as 44).
65 The minimum score at which autism is considered.
90 Stronger indications of autism, although non-autistics may score as high.
130 The mean score of autistic people; strong evidence for autism.
160 Very strong evidence for autism.
227 The maximum score autistic people acquired in Ritvo’s seminal paper on the RAADS–R.[10]
240 The maximum possible RAADS–R score.
❯
Do note that no single test is conclusive, and not every autistic person necessarily
scores above the defined threshold on each test. If you score low on the RAADS–R
but still think you could be autistic, try taking a few other autism tests.
❮
Statements per subscales
Social Sensory/ Circumscribe
Statement relatedness Language motor interests
1 ✘
2 ✘
3 ✘
4 ✘
5 ✘
6 ✘
7 ✘
8 ✘
9 ✘
10 ✘
11 ✘
12 ✘
13 ✘
Social Sensory/ Circumscribe
Statement relatedness Language motor interests
14 ✘
15 ✘
16 ✘
17 ✘
18 ✘
19 ✘
20 ✘
21 ✘
22 ✘
23 ✘
24 ✘
25 ✘
26 ✘
27 ✘
28 ✘
29 ✘
30 ✘
31 ✘
32 ✘
33 ✘
34 ✘
35 ✘
36 ✘
37 ✘
38 ✘
39 ✘
40 ✘
41 ✘
42 ✘
43 ✘
44 ✘
45 ✘
46 ✘
47 ✘
48 ✘
49 ✘
50 ✘
51 ✘
52 ✘
53 ✘
54 ✘
55 ✘
56 ✘
57 ✘
58 ✘
Social Sensory/ Circumscribe
Statement relatedness Language motor interests
59 ✘
60 ✘
61 ✘
62 ✘
63 ✘
64 ✘
65 ✘
66 ✘
67 ✘
68 ✘
69 ✘
70 ✘
71 ✘
72 ✘
73 ✘
74 ✘
75 ✘
76 ✘
77 ✘
78 ✘
79 ✘
80 ✘
❯
CAT-Q
Measures camouflaging, and can account
for lower scores on other autism tests
Aspie Quiz
Identifies neurodivergence and
potential co-occurring conditions
Online autism tests can play an essential role in the process of self-discovery, and
may inform your decision to pursue a formal diagnosis. For a formal assessment,
please see a knowledgeable medical professional trained in assessing autism.
Autism assessments
Share to50.7k33.4k59k66k956
References
References
1↑ A Scale to Assist the Diagnosis of Autism and Asperger’s Disorder in Adults (RAADS): A Pilot S
The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS–R): A scale to assist the diagnosis
2↑, 3↑, 4↑
in adults: An international validation study (Ritvo et al., 2011)
Table 7 – Test-retest data statistical analysis | The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revise
5↑
assist the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in adults: An international validation study (Ritvo
6↑ The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS–R)
7↑ Psychometric exploration of the RAADS-R with autistic adults: Implications for research and clini
2024)
Examining the Diagnostic Validity of Autism Measures Among Adults in an Outpatient Clinic Sam
8↑
McGonigle, 2019)
9↑ Diagnostic Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder | CDC
The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R): A Scale to Assist the Diagnos
10↑
Disorder in Adults: An International Validation Study (Ritvo et al., 2011)