Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes: Innovative Microbe-Based Applications For Removal 1St Edition - Ebook PDF
Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes: Innovative Microbe-Based Applications For Removal 1St Edition - Ebook PDF
Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes: Innovative Microbe-Based Applications For Removal 1St Edition - Ebook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/development-in-wastewater-
treatment-research-and-processes-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/development-in-wastewater-
treatment-research-and-processes-ebook-pdf-2/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/development-in-wastewater-
treatment-research-and-processes-microbial-degradation-of-
xenobiotics-through-bacterial-and-fungal-approach-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/an-innovative-role-of-
biofiltration-in-wastewater-treatment-plants-wwtps-ebook-pdf/
Integrated Environmental Technologies for Wastewater
Treatment and Sustainable Development 1st Edition -
eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/integrated-environmental-
technologies-for-wastewater-treatment-and-sustainable-
development-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/modular-treatment-approach-for-
drinking-water-and-wastewater-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/electrochemical-water-and-
wastewater-treatment-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/valorization-of-microalgal-
biomass-and-wastewater-treatment-ebook-pdf/
Development in
Wastewater Treatment
Research and
Processes
This page intentionally left blank
Development in
Wastewater Treatment
Research and
Processes
Innovative Microbe-Based
Applications for Removal of
Chemicals and Metals in
Wastewater Treatment Plants
Edited by
Maulin P. Shah
Senior Environmental Microbiologist, Environmental Microbiology
Lab, Bharuch, Gujarat, India
Susana Rodriguez-Couto
Department of Separation Science, LUT School of Engineering
Science, LUT University, Mikkeli, Finland
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional
practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described
herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety
and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional
responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or
editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a
matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any
methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
8 Detoxification............................................................... 253
9 Different types of bioremediators for heavy metals ............. 256
9.1 Algae...................................................................257
9.2 Fungi...................................................................258
9.3 Bacteria ...............................................................258
10 Integrated system .......................................................... 259
11 Conclusion and future perspectives................................... 260
References ................................................................... 261
CHAPTER 12 Membrane proteins mediated microbial-
electrochemical remediation technology............. 265
Jesús Pérez-Garcı´a, Javier Bacame-Valenzuela,
Diana Mayra Sánchez López,
José de Jesús Gómez-Guzmán,
Martha Leticia Jiménez González,
Luis Ortiz-Frade and Yolanda Reyes-Vidal
1 Introduction ................................................................. 265
2 Microbial electrochemistry ............................................. 267
2.1 Microbial-electrochemical systems for
bioremediation ..................................................... 268
3 Membrane protein complex in electrogenic bacteria for
bioremediation ............................................................. 270
3.1 Respiratory complexes of Shewanella oneidensis and
heavy metals biodegradation................................... 270
3.2 Redox mediators of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in
environmental bioremediation ................................. 272
3.3 Geobacter sulfurreducens cytochromes and
nanowires in heavy metals reduction ........................ 272
4 Biological enzymes for environmental bioremediation......... 273
4.1 Oxidoreductases ................................................... 274
4.2 Peroxidases.......................................................... 274
4.3 Oxygenases.......................................................... 275
4.4 Monooxygenases .................................................. 275
4.5 Methane oxygenase (MMO) ................................... 276
4.6 Laccases.............................................................. 276
5 Electrochemical characterization of redox enzymes ............ 277
5.1 Cyclic voltammetry............................................... 277
5.2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).......... 278
5.3 Coupled spectroscopic and electrochemical
techniques ........................................................... 279
6 Perspectives ................................................................. 281
References ................................................................... 282
Contents xiii
Index...................................................................................................461
This page intentionally left blank
Contributors
Kunwali Das
Department of Microbiology, Tripura University (A Central University), Agartala,
Tripura, India
Moazam Ali
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Agriculture,
Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
Jayshree Annamalai
Centre for Environmental Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Anna
University, CEG Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Ambreen Ashar
Department of Chemistry, Government College Women University, Faisalabad,
Punjab, Pakistan
Javier Bacame-Valenzuela
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México; CONACYT-
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México
Pujaita Banerjee
Department of Life Sciences, Presidency University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Sudeshna Banerjee
Department of Microbiology, Amity University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Sanchayita Basu
Department of Microbiology, Tripura University (A Central University), Agartala,
Tripura, India
Manaswini Behera
School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar,
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Hiren N. Bhalani
College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat,
India
Navneeta Bharadvaja
Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi
Technological University, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Devikaben Bharatbhai Vishani
Department of Microbiology, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University,
Vadodara, Gujarat, India
xix
xx Contributors
Deepti Bhardwaj
Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi
Technological University, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Pinal Bhatt
Department of Microbiology, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University,
Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Joyani Bhattacharjee
Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, West
Bengal, India
Arunima Bhattacharjee
Department of Microbiology, Tripura University (A Central University), Agartala,
Tripura, India
Sourish Bhattacharya
Process Design and Engineering Cell, CSIR Central Salt and Marine Chemicals
Research Institute, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
Zeeshan Ahmad Bhutta
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter
Bush Campus, Midlothian, Scotland, United Kingdom
Pitam Chakrabarti
Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, West
Bengal, India
Vivek Chauhan
Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill,
Himachal Pradesh, India
Suraj Chetri
Department of Zoology, Cotton University, Guwahati, Assam, India
Mohita Chugh
Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi
Technological University, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Anjali Dahiya
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati,
Assam, India
Sagar Daki
Process Design and Engineering Cell, CSIR Central Salt and Marine Chemicals
Research Institute, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
José de Jesús Gómez-Guzmán
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México
Contributors xxi
Subhasish Dutta
Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, West
Bengal, India
Salman Farissi
Department of Environmental Science, School of Earth Science Systems, Central
University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India
Janhavi Gadkari
Department of Microbiology, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University,
Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Priya Gautam
Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill,
Himachal Pradesh, India
Bhaswati Ghosh
Department of Microbiology, Sarsuna College, University of Calcutta, Kolkata,
West Bengal, India
Martha Leticia Jiménez González
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México
Rishee K. Kalaria
ASPEE Shakilam Biotechnology Institute, Navsari Agricultural University, Surat,
Gujarat, India
Ayesha Kanwal
Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, The Islamia
University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
Shamsher S. Kanwar
Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill,
Himachal Pradesh, India
Priya Khadgawat
Department of Genetics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Khushbu
Department of Applied Chemistry, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi,
Delhi, India
Veena Gayathri Krishnaswamy
Department of Biotechnology Stella Maris College (Autonomous), Affiliated to
University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Deepak Kumar
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, Haryana,
India
xxii Contributors
Lakhan Kumar
Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Delhi
Technological University, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Ashutosh Kumar
Department of Microbiology, Tripura University (A Central University), Agartala,
Tripura, India
Sangeeta Kumari
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, Haryana,
India
Sidak Minocha
Department of Genetics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Muthukumar Muthuchamy
Department of Environmental Science, School of Earth Science Systems, Central
University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India
Anbazhagi Muthukumar
Department of Environmental Science, School of Earth Science Systems, Central
University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India
Iqra Muzammil
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Agriculture,
Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
Luis Ortiz-Frade
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México
Ashok Pandey
CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicological Research, Lucknow, Uttar Praesh, India
Shubhangi Parmar
Process Design and Engineering Cell, CSIR Central Salt and Marine Chemicals
Research Institute, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
Hiren K. Patel
School of Sciences, P P Savani University, Surat, Gujarat, India
Bhisma K. Patel
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati,
Assam, India
S.M. Paul Khurana
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, Haryana,
India
Contributors xxiii
Jesús Pérez-Garcı́a
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México
Sneha Ramesh
Department of Environmental Science, School of Earth Science Systems, Central
University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India
Sathish Raam Ravichandran
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, Tamil
Nadu, India
Aryama Raychaudhuri
School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar,
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Yolanda Reyes-Vidal
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México; CONACYT-
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México
Dipanjan Roy
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ramkrishna Mission Vivekananda
Educational and Research Institute (RKMVERI), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Ashish Kumar Sahoo
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati,
Assam, India
Mothil Sengottian
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, Tamil
Nadu, India
Aveepsa Sengupta
Department of Microbiology, Tripura University (A Central University), Agartala,
Tripura, India
Bipin Kumar Sharma
Department of Microbiology, Tripura University (A Central University), Agartala,
Tripura, India
Muhammad Shoaib
Institute of Microbiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan;
Key Laboratory of New Animal Drug Project, Gansu Province, Key Laboratory of
Veterinary Pharmaceutical Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Lanzhou
Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences of CAAS, Lanzhou, China
xxiv Contributors
Anupama Shrivastav
Department of Microbiology, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University,
Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Pragati Singh
Department of Microbiology, Tripura University (A Central University), Agartala,
Tripura, India
Rajalakshmi Sridharan
Department of Biotechnology Stella Maris College (Autonomous), Affiliated to
University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Diana Mayra Sánchez López
Center of Research and Technological Development in Electrochemistry,
Querétaro Technology Park, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro, México
Sabeela Beevi Ummalyma
Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), An Autonomous
Institute Under Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, Takyelpat,
Imphal, Manipur, India
Divyesh K. Vasava
College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat,
India
Chitra Devi Venkatachalam
Department of Food Technology, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, Tamil Nadu,
India
Sivakumar Venkatachalam
Department of Chemical Engineering, AC Tech Campus, Anna University,
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
CHAPTER
A comparative study
between physicochemical
and biological methods for
effective removal of textile
1
dye from wastewater
Subhasish Dutta, Joyani Bhattacharjee
Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, West Bengal, India
1. Introduction
One of the major sources of pollution in nature is industrial wastewater. Due to high
global development, various chemical agents like dyes, pigments, and other aro-
matic compounds are used in industries such as textile, printing, pharmaceuticals,
and plastics to generate products with better results (Khan and et al., 2020). Various
studies have confirmed that an average sized textile industry consumes around 1.6
million liters of water per day for the production of about 8000 kg of fabric. A
research from World Bank has said around 17%e20% of textile industry water
pollution comes from dyeing and finishing treatments that are applied to the fabric.
The processes included in the main steps of textile industry are resizing, dyeing,
printing and some finishing steps. The finishing steps are softening, cross-linking
and waterproofing and they require a huge amount of water supply (Nemr, 2012;
Bhatia et al., 2017). Large amount of effluents are generated from dyeing and the
finishing processes. Dyeing can be defined as the process of applying colors to
the fabrics which are resistant to the effect of light, water, and soap. Tannin and
lignin are considered examples of coloring agents. For various other processes to
be carried out in the textile industry, a particular mixture is made out of chemicals,
dye stuffs, and water. Once the process is completely done this mixture is released
into various water bodies (Anjaneyulu et al., 2005). The presence of suspended solid
particles, high chemical oxygen demand (COD), synthetic dyes, and heavy metals
such as lead, mercury, and cadmium have been considered to increase the toxicity
of water. These textile effluents alter the color and composition of the water bodies
making it very hazardous for the marine ecosystem (Nguyen and Ruey-Shin, 2013).
Dyes have high thermal and photo stability which helps them to persist for an
extended period of time in the water environment if left untreated. The dark color
imparted by these toxic chemicals reduces the sunlight penetration thus hampering
photosynthesis. They also inhibit the growth and activity of microorganisms.
The effluents generated from these textile industries are not only considered to be
toxic for the aquatic ecosystem but they are also enriched by the presence of various
carcinogenic and mutagenic substances which are harmful to human beings too. For
instance, the very famous azo dye, which is one of the main components of textile
industry, is very much responsible for bladder cancer in humans (Ramachandran
et al., 2013). They also cause severe damage to kidney, brain, reproductive system.
Therefore, in this chapter an effort has been made in discussing the preexisting phys-
iochemical methods to remove toxicity from textile effluents and their inefficiencies
and cost effectiveness, with special focus on biological methods which have been
found beneficial.
Based on the presence of chromophoric groups, dyes can be classified into more
than 20e30 groups. Out of which most important ones are nitro dyes, nitroso dyes,
azo dyes, trimethyl ethane dyes, phthalein dyes, indigo dyes, anthraquinone dyes,
and sulfur dye (Benkhaya et al., 2020; Ramachandran et al., 2013).
3. Physical methods
Physical methods can be defined as a straight forward method to remove toxic efflu-
ents from wastewater by the application of forces such as gravitation, electrical
3. Physical methods 5
Modified from El Harfi, S., El Harfi, A., 2017. Classifications, properties and applications of textile dyes: a
review. Appl. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 3 (3), 00000e00003 and Singh, P.K., Ram, L.S., 2017. Bio-removal
of azo dyes: a review. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 5 (2), 108e126.
attraction, and van der Waal’s force. Of all the three methodologies (physical, chem-
ical, and biological), physical method is the most used one as it is much simpler, effi-
cient, and the least amount of chemicals and biological organisms are used (Vanitha
et al., 2018).
3.1 Adsorption
Of all the available physical methods, adsorption has been proven to be the most effi-
cient and widely used technology to treat waste water effluents (Anjaneyulu et al.,
2005). Adsorption can be defined as a physicochemical mass transfer process where
6 CHAPTER 1 A comparative study between physicochemical and biological
elements are concentrated on the surface of the adsorbent (solid or liquid). This pro-
cess happens in the interface of either two similar or different states for example,
liquid-liquid, gas-liquid, and solid-liquid (Natarajan et al., 2018). The process of
adsorption has been considered as one of the most feasible equilibrium separation
techniques to remove toxic effluents from water bodies due to its economic effi-
ciency and also due to the production of high quality products (Natarajan et al.,
2018). To perform adsorption, no pretreatment is required. Often, it is used as a post-
treatment for various other conventional methods as the process doesn’t produce
additional toxic matters as a result in the end (Vanitha et al., 2018). The surface
on which the process of adsorption takes place is called adsorbent and the adsorbates
are the molecules that get adhered to the surface of adsorbent. If the process of
adsorption is characterized by low heat generation and is reversible in nature, it is
called physisorption (physical adsorption). If the process is characterized by
high heat generation and is irreversible in nature with chemical force acting
between adsorbate and adsorbent, it is called chemisorptions (chemical adsorption)
(Natarajan et al., 2018).
Factors affecting adsorption: There are certain physicochemical factors associ-
ated with adsorption such as temperature, pH, solution concentration, nature of
adsorbate (molecular structure, size, and weight), surface charge, and time duration
of contact (Vanitha et al., 2018; Saini, 2017).
Due to the rising popularity of the adsorption process, a vast range of adsorbents
are used nowadays. Few of them are chitin, almond peels, fly ashes, baggase, acti-
vated carbon, sugarcane, etc.
substances like biomass, waste materials, and so forth (Vanitha et al., 2018). Acti-
vated carbon particle comes in different shapes and sizes. Powdered activated carbon
(PAC) is very fine in structure thus they can stay suspended for longer while and
making it difficult to be reused. Adding a little quantity of polyaluminum chloride
can enhance the decolorization rate making it easier to collect the sludge from
settling tank and reuse them. In case of granular activated carbon (GAC), it is easier
to replace the GAC packed bed with fresh amount of carbon particles when
exhausted (Nguyen and Ruey-Shin, 2013).
3.2.1 Irradiation
This is the simplest yet effective technique to remove textile dye effluents from
waste water. This process requires a large amount of UV radiation and constant dis-
solved oxygen supply. Titanium dioxide acts as a catalyst in the process. On treating
a secondary effluent with irradiation of gamma ray it was found that there was a
reduction of 64% COD, 34% TOC, and 88% of color (Anjaneyulu et al., 2005;
Robinson et al., 2001).
4. Membrane technology
Membrane technology can be considered as one of the most effective and cost-
efficient methods which not only help in decolorization but also in reduction of
BOD and COD of wastewater. The main advantage of membrane technology is
that the drench can be further reused. This kind of technology is immensely useful
in places where there is shortage of water (Buckley, 1992). On the basis of classifi-
cation of dye and degree of separation of effluents, this process can be classified into
four types.
4.1 Microfiltration
This is one of the oldest yet most capable ways of removing suspended particles hav-
ing aperture approximately 0.1e1 mm. Through this process of microfiltration wide
range of contaminants such as suspended particles, yeast cells, large pathogens, and
so forth can be separated. Microfiltration is usually performed prior to reverse
osmosis and nanofiltration (Buckley, 1992; Anis et al., 2019).
5. Chemical methods 9
4.3 Nanofiltration
The process of nanofiltration also known as charged filtration is performed after
adsorption to minimize the polarization concentration happening during the filtra-
tion process. It has the advantage of both reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration (UF),
i.e., application of moderate pressure like UF and separations of solutions like
reverse osmosis. Commercially available nanofiltration membrane have been used
to treat cotton textile dye effluents (Buckley, 1992; Xu and Lebrun, 1999).
4.4 Ultrafiltration
UF can be considered as a one-step removal of secondary effluents. UF can be
considered as an RO pretreatment. In many cases UF membranes have been found
using hollow fiber geometry (Xu and Lebrun, 1999).
From the experiment conducted by Paz’dzior et al. for the removal of azo dye by
the amalgamation of nanofiltration with biological methods, it was concluded that
almost 90% color removal was evident and pure colorless filtrate was obtained hav-
ing adequate quantity of salt and alkali concentration. Due to the formation of cleav-
age of Reactive Red 120, orthanilic acid was released. In an aerobic reactor, this acid
was further degraded whereas in the sequencing batch reactor, the aromatic amine
was not degenerated using the microbial culture (Pazdzior et al., 2009).
_
Zy11a et al. performed an experiment with real wastewater collected from two
textile plants. On applying nanofiltration on these textile effluents it was found
that there was significant deterioration in the COD and textile colors. The further
concentrated product in the nanofiltration was made to undergo anoxic biological
treatment. It was observed that there was approximately 50% reduction in the
COD. It was also inferred that the filtrate received from nanofiltration could be
_
used as process water for the rest of the process (Zy11a et al., 2006).
5. Chemical methods
Chemical methods of dye removal can be defined as a collection of certain conven-
tional methods performed by utilizing chemical theories to remove textile dye
10 CHAPTER 1 A comparative study between physicochemical and biological
effluents. This method requires specific set of equipments and high electrical energy
to work efficiently. Usually chemical technologies have been proven to have success
rate of 88%e99% (Vanitha et al., 2018).
5.2 Ozonation
This is one of the most effective chemical processes for nearly complete removal of
textile dye effluents from waste water. Ozone is an excellent oxidizing agent
compared to chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, and other oxidizing agents due to its
high instability. The proportion of ozone to be used in the process is directly propor-
tional to the amount of color and residual COD to be removed. The end product of
ozonation can be easily discharged in the water bodies easily due to the lesser
amount of color and COD present. Ozone can be applied in gaseous state thus vol-
ume of the sludge is not increased (Vanitha et al., 2018). In an experiment conducted
by Lin et al., three strengths of waste water effluent were collected low, medium and
high. The COD and color content of the effluents were observed to intensify from
low to high in the three containers. For low strength, it was inferred that only ozon-
ation was sufficient for decolorization and to remove turbidity. But for medium and
high strength, ozonation was found to be effective for the removal of color but not
5. Chemical methods 11
for turbidity reduction. Thus, coagulation with aluminum sulfate or PAC was neces-
sary. Even with the amalgamation of chemical coagulation with ozonation, approx-
imately 70% COD could be reduced (Lin and Lin., 1993).
5.3 Cucurbitiril
These are cyclic oligomer molecules made up of glycoluril and formaldehyde.
Glycoluril is formed from glyoxal and urea. The monomers are held together by
methylene bridges. The origin of the name cucurbitiril is from the Latin word
Cucurbita maxima which is the scientific name for pumpkin, for its pumpkin like
structure. The uril part of cucurbitiril emphasizes on the presence of urea. It was
inferred that cucurbitiril has extremely good sorption capacity for several textile
dyes. It also forms host-guest relation with aromatic compounds thus removing
the toxicity for adsorption. Another mechanism is based on formation of insoluble
cucurbitiril dye-cation aggregate as adsorption occurs at a faster rate (Robinson
et al., 2001; Nagy et al., 2009) (Fig. 1.1).
FIGURE 1.1
Structure of cucurbitiril (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Cucurbit_8_uril).
12 CHAPTER 1 A comparative study between physicochemical and biological
the brightness of the product. The chloride molecule attacks the amino group of the
dye, thus accelerating an azo bonding cleavage. This method is not applied for azo
dyes. In an experiment conducted by Massoudinejad et al. it was concluded that
combining chemical oxidation method with sodium hypochlorite solution gives rele-
vant standard to biological method. It was also noticed that imported chorine was
about 3.65 times more efficient than Iranian native chlorine (Robinson et al.,
2001; Massoudinejad et al., 2015).
5.5.1 Photocatalysis
Photo catalysis can be defined as a process by which a photo reaction is accelerated
in the presence of catalyst. This method degrades the dye molecule into water and
carbon dioxide by the action of UV rays in the presence of catalyst H2O2. Depending
on the product to be catalyzed and the length of the reaction, various byproducts are
formed. No sludge production is associated with the process. UV light on degrading
reaction with H2O2, forms two hydroxyl radicals which help in the further chemical
processes (Robinson et al., 2001).
Photo catalytic removals of organic pollutants have been found to be one of the
most effective ways. Ag/Cl can be considered as high performing photo catalysts
that can be used for degradation. Zhao et al. in his experiment successfully prepared
Ag/AgCl nanoparticles biochemically from the metabolin of living fungi. These
nanoparticles were found to be 3e5 nm in size, spherical in shape. On studying these
particles under microscope it was found that these particles show visible light driven
photo catalytic performance. This biochemical invention helped in the degradation
of a carcinogenic RhB (Zhao et al., 2015).
6. Advanced oxidation process 13
pH can be easily oxidized. It has been studied that sulfate radicals are selective in
nature thus can be used properly to oxidize specific functional groups responsible
for toxicity of wastewater (Lutze et al., 2015).
7. Biological methods
Various physicochemical methods such as oxidation, ozonation, membrane technol-
ogy, coagulation flocculation, and AOPs have been administered to reduce the COD
level and to remove the toxic effluents which are released from textile effluents in
various water bodies. But these processes have some limitations such as costing,
equipments and sludge formation in the end. Many of these processes even work
in situ for only small scale effluents. Thus biological methods have been used as
alternating techniques to remove large scale effluents using living microorganisms
in much cost-efficient and simpler way (Table 1.2).
Table 1.2 Factors affecting biological method of dye removal (Rauf and
Ashraf, 2012; Wesenberg et al., 2003).
Serial
no. Factor Affect
1 Oxygen Dye degradation can occur under aerobic and anaerobic
conditions. Under anaerobic condition, reductive enzyme
activity is higher. Under aerobic conditions, carbon sources
like glucose, starch, acetate affect the decolorization process.
2 Ph The enzymatic activity depends on the pH and on the acid-
base behavior of the substrate and amino acid side chain. The
optimum pH for color removal is often neural or slightly
alkaline. The rate of color removal decreases with acidic pH
values.
3 Temperature This is one of the most impactful parameters. With an increase
in temperature, the rate of color removal increases too. The
temperature required for maximum color removal is nearly
around 35 to 45 C, which is also optimum for cell growth.
4 Dye structure The more dye concentration, the more is the amount of
and toxicity. Dye structure varies in different dyes. Dyes with
concentration simple structure and low molecular weight give out higher rate
of color removal and the process is more difficult with dyes of
high molecular weight.
5 Redox Enzyme mediated degradation is a versatile process efficient
mediator process. The redox mediator is required to maintain the redox
equilibrium. The more redox potential, the faster the molecule
is reduced.
7. Biological methods 15
can be defined as a process which prevents cell washing outs and also allows higher
cell density to be maintained in the continuous reactor. Immobilization upgrades the
catalytic stability thus increasing the concentration of degradation of textile dyes. It
has been studied that immobilization results in increased uptake of nutrients due to
the availability of nutrients at the solid-liquid interface. On comparing the immobi-
lized cells of Pseudomonas putinda P8 to the free cells P. putinda, the immobilized
cells have been found to be more efficient in degrading catechol. Immobilization
method using biomass has been found to be really beneficial. It is performed under
aseptic conditions within the bioreactors (Puvaneswari et al., 2006).
62.5 kDa. They are secreted in multiple isoforms. MnPs generally oxidize Mn2þ to
Mn3þ which then is stabilized by chelating compound such as oxalic acid which is
also secreted by the fungi itself. The chelated Mn3þ thus formed is highly reactive
and acts as a diffusible redox mediator. Thus, MnPs oxidizes and depolymerizes
lignin and also xenobiotics like nitroaminotoluenes and toxic textile dyes. The
stability of MnP can be enhanced by immobilizing with sodium alginate, gelatin
or chitosan as carriers and glutaraldehyde as cross-linking (Wesenberg et al.,
2003; Asgher et al., 2008).
7.6.3 Laccases
These are N-glycosylated extracellular blue multicopper oxidases having molecular
mass around 58e90 kDa. The optimum pH and temperature vary from around 2 to
10 and 40e65 C respectively. Two strains of laccase isoenzymes LacI and LacII
have been found in Physisporinus rivulosus T241i, Trametestrogii, Cerrena unicolor
137 and Panustigrinus. Laccases along with oxidizing aphenolic and methoxyphe-
nolic acids, it also decarboxylizes them and attacks their methoxy groups (Asgher
et al., 2008).
Small molecule mediators are low molecular weight highly diffusible redox sub-
stances which help in the interaction between lignin and LME. Due to the random
polymer nature of lignin and bulk of LME, the interaction becomes highly problem-
atic thus these mediators come in action. A few examples of native mediators are P.
chrysosporium, Armillaria mellea, and so forth (Wesenberg et al., 2003).
Most of the dye stuffs that are used in the industries are extensively harmful to
any living being. These dye effluents are highly carcinogenic in nature. White-rot
fungi are used for the purpose of degradation of these harmful dye effluents.
White-rot fungi are preferred over prokaryotic cells due to the presence of LME
system which is nonspecific in nature, thus can degrade a wide range of dyes. P.
chrysosporium and Trametes versicolor are the most used ones. There are other use-
ful WRF too, they are Phellinus gilvus. DIchomitussqualens. Irpex flavus, Gano-
derma sp., etc. The degrading mechanism of dyes varies from the structure and
reactivity of different dyes. For instance, the decolorization of Reactive Blue 15
by chrysosporium follows first order kinetics with respect to initial dye concentra-
tion. Here, MnP plays a major role in decolorization (Asgher et al., 2008).
In an experiment conducted by Kapdan et al. he prepared four separate white-rot
fungi cultures to decolorize five kinds of textile dyes. The strains of white-rot fungi
taken were P. chrysosporium MUCL, P. chrysosporium 671.71, Coriolus versicolor
MUCL, and C. versicolor. The dye stuffs taken were Everzol Yellow 4 GL (Reactive-
monoazo), Everzol Red RBN (Reactive-monoazo), Drimaren Orange K-GL
(Reactive-disazo), Everdirect Supra Yellow PG (Direct-disazo) and Everzol
Turquoise Blue G (Reactive-phtalocyanin). He concluded that the culture of P.
chrysosporium or C. versicolor were highly effective in total removal of dye color
effluents. But, the high incubation temperature around 37 C was marked to be disad-
vantage for the process. Because of lower incubation temperature around 28 C
requirement for C. versicolor cultures, C. versicolor MUCL culture seems to be
more suitable than P. chrysosporium culture for practical applications (Kapdan
et al., 2000).
References 19
8. Conclusion
Different textile industries generate different forms of textile dyes. In this research
article, various physicochemical methods, their advantages and limitations, and
various biological processes with their advantages, have been discussed (Bhatia
et al., 2017). The various physicochemical methods were found to be costly and
reactive only when the effluent volume was less. Many of these processes produced
large volumes of sludge in the end thus not being effective in removal of toxicity
(Ramachandran et al., 2013). Due to the ineffectiveness of the conventional
physicochemical processes, biological processes have been discussed which were
considered to be more ecofriendly and effective for the removal of textile dyes
(Ramachandran et al., 2013). Bioremediation methods use naturally occurring
microbes which are economically friendly and even cost-efficient. Processes like
biosorption is an amalgamation of physical and biological method has been
discussed as an emerging technique which can be used to degrade textile effluent
(Bhatia et al., 2017).
References
Anis, S.F., Raed, H., Nidal, H., 2019. Microfiltration membrane processes: a review of
research trends over the past decade. J. Water Process Eng. 32, 100941.
Anjaneyulu, Y., Sreedhara Chary, N., Samuel Suman Raj, D., 2005. Decolourization of indus-
trial effluents e available methods and emerging technologies e a review. Rev. Environ.
Sci. Biotechnol. 4 (4), 245e273.
Asgher, M., Bhatti, H.N., Ashraf, M., Legge, R.L., 2008. Recent developments in biodegra-
dation of industrial pollutants by white rot fungi and their enzyme system. Biodegradation
19 (6), 771.
Azbar, N.U.R.I.,_ Yonar, T., Kestioglu, K., 2004. Comparison of various advanced oxidation
processes and chemical treatment methods for COD and color removal from a polyester
and acetate fiber dyeing effluent. Chemosphere 55 (1), 35e43.
Banat, I.M., Nigam, P., Singh, D., Marchant, R., 1996. Microbial decolorization of textile-
dyecontaining effluents: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 58 (3), 217e227.
Benkhaya, S., Mrabet, S., Ahmed, El H., 2020. A review on classifications, recent synthesis
and applications of textile dyes. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 107891.
Bhatia, D., Sharma, N.R., Singh, J., Kanwar, R.S., 2017. Biological methods for textile dye
removal from wastewater: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (19), 1836e1876.
Buckley, C.A., 1992. Membrane technology for the treatment of dyehouse effluents. Water
Sci. Technol. 25 (10), 203e209.
Dewil, R., DionissiosMantzavinos, I.P., Rodrigo, M.A., 2017. New perspectives for advanced
oxidation processes. J. Environ. Manag. 195, 93e99.
Dos, S., André, B., Cervantes, F.J., van Lier, J.B., 2007. Review paper on current technologies
for decolourisation of textile wastewaters: perspectives for anaerobic biotechnology.
Bioresour. Technol. 98 (12), 2369e2385.
El Harfi, S., El Harfi, A., 2017. Classifications, properties and applications of textile dyes: a
review. App. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 3 (3), 00000e00003.
20 CHAPTER 1 A comparative study between physicochemical and biological
Ganzenko, O., Huguenot, D., Van Hullebusch, E.D., Esposito, G., Oturan, M.A., 2014.
Electrochemical advanced oxidation and biological processes for wastewater treatment:
a review of the combined approaches. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 21 (14),
8493e8524.
Imran, M., Crowley, D.E., Khalid, A., Hussain, S., Mumtaz, M.W., Arshad, M., 2015.
Microbial biotechnology for decolorization of textile wastewaters. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio-
technol. 14 (no. 1), 73e92.
Joshi, M., Bansal, R., RengPurwar, 2004. Colour Removal from Textile Effluents.
Kapdan, I., Kargi, F., McMullan, G., Roger, M., 2000. Comparison of white-rot fungi cultures
for decolorization of textile dyestuffs. Bioprocess Eng. 22 (4), 347e351.
Khan, N.A., et al., 2020. Recent Trends in Disposal and Treatment Technologies of Emerging-
Pollutants- A Critical Review.
Khan, R., Bhawana, P., Fulekar, M.H., 2013. Microbial decolorization and degradation of syn-
thetic dyes: a review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 12 (1), 75e97.
Lahkimi, A., Oturan, M.A., Oturan, N., Chaouch, M., 2007. Removal of textile dyes from
water by the electro-Fenton process. Environ. Chem. Lett. 5 (1), 35e39.
Lin, S.H., Lin, C.M., 1993. Treatment of textile waste effluents by ozonation and chemical
coagulation. Water Res. 27 (12), 1743e1748.
Lutze, H.V., Kerlin, N., Schmidt, T.C., 2015. Sulfate radical-based water treatment in presence
of chloride: formation of chlorate, inter-conversion of sulfate radicals into hydroxyl
radicals and influence of bicarbonate. Water Res. 72, 349e360.
Malaeb, L., Ayoub, G.M., 2011. Reverse osmosis technology for water treatment: state of the
art review. Desalination 267 (1), 1e8.
Massoudinejad, M., Ghaderpoori, M., Rezazadeh Azari, M., 2015. The removal of COD and
color from textile industry by chlorine hypochlorite. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 76, 35e42.
Nagy, H.J., PéterSallay, M.L.V., IstvánRusznák, P.B., András, V., 2009. Removal of dyes from
industrial wastewater by cucurbiturils. Textil. Res. J. 79 (14), 1312e1318.
Natarajan, S., Hari, C., Bajaj, Tayade, R.J., 2018. Recent advances based on the synergetic
effect of adsorption for removal of dyes from waste water using photocatalytic process.
J. Environ. Sci. 65, 201e222.
Nemr, A.E.L., 2012. Non-Conventional Textile Waste Water Treatment. Nova Science
Publishers.
Nguyen, T.A., Ruey-Shin, J., 2013. Treatment of waters and wastewaters containing sulfur
dyes: a review. Chem. Eng. J. 219, 109e117.
Panizza, M., Cerisola, G., 2001. Removal of organic pollutants from industrial wastewater by
electrogenerated Fenton’s reagent. Water Res. 35 (16), 3987e3992.
Pazdzior, K., Klepacz-Smó1ka, A., Ledakowicz, S., Sójka-Ledakowicz, J., Mrozi nska, Z.,
_
Zy11a, R., 2009. Integration of nanofiltration and biological degradation of textile waste-
water containing azo dye. Chemosphere 75 (2), 250e255.
Porter, J.J., 1973. The stability of acid, basic, and direct dyes to light and water. Textil. Res. J.
43 (12), 735e744.
Puvaneswari, N., Muthukrishnan, J., Gunasekaran, P., 2006. Toxicity Assessment and Micro-
bial Degradation of Azo Dyes.
Ramachandran, P., Rajakumar, S., Palaniyappan, J., Ayyasamy, P.M., 2013. Potential process
implicated in bioremediation of textile effluents: a review. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 4 (no. 1),
131e145.
Rauf, M.A., Ashraf, S.S., 2012. Survey of recent trends in biochemically assisted degradation
of dyes. Chem. Eng. J. 209, 520e530.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Trouble Times
Two
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Illustrator: Raymond
Language: English
Illustrated by Raymond
The pilot model was not completely out of sight before Thomas had
the power cowls off, and the whole model stripped of its servicing
doors. They had done an excellent job of design; the sky car without
its servicing panels was but a skeleton frame, with every line, every
connection, and every control rod open for easy servicing.
And it was then and there that the physicist understood what the
engineer had been doing.
Instead of the low-voltage high-current supply lines, with their
attendant heavy busbars, thin pipes ran about the sky car. Seamless
aluminum tubing carried the energizing current. Or, rather the space
inside of the tubing carried it. At the generator end, a ten megawatt
microwave generator supplied high power at ultra high frequency. At
the terminus, rectifiers brought the ultra high frequency down to
direct current for operation of the force-field generators.
Thomas nodded. It was not the final tenth of one percent job. It was
not direct current. The diagravitic force was not constant. It operated
only seven tenths of the time, and was turned off and on fifteen or
twenty million million times per second. Nothing short of high-
definition test equipment would ever tell the difference, however.
Gone were the massive electromagnetic deflection field coils. In their
place was a set of seventy kilovolt electrostatic plates.
Missing entirely were the variable-speed motor generators. In their
place was a simple crystalline formation under permanent magnetic
stress. "Artificial radio-activated crystals," muttered Thomas. "Good
for a couple of years."
But the feed lines. The feed lines. The current carrying ability of
space itself—not the metallic conductor—did the trick. Using the ultra
high frequency bands, the busbars had been replaced with
cylindrical wave guides. The depth of penetration was measured in
microns at those frequencies—and as long as the guides were
properly designed, they offered little loss in power. The current went
down the wave guides by virtue of the magnetic fields created
throughout the guides—magnetic fields generated in the space
inside of the tubular guides.
The generator itself was one of the new crystal microwave
generators and the rectifiers at the receiving end were of the same
ilk.
And the five tons of equipment had vanished in a puff of tubular
guides, electrostatic plates, and intermittent operation.
Thomas hit a snag for a moment. The engineer had answered his
challenge. So he'd come up with the answer to the five-ton-per-fifty-
pound answer—and had gone further. Thomas knew that there was
no apparent limit to the maximum power or lift. It merely set a fifty
pound minimum—actually it was 49.87 pounds by measurement—
under which limit no amount of tinkering would produce the effect.
He smiled. There must be something beyond. After all, small stones
moved quietly in natural poltergeist manifestation; they would be
able to reproduce that eventually. But for now, the engineer was
willing to accept the limitation whereas the physicist would not.
He knew now. And he'd leave the sky car until the engineer returned.
Let him beef up the control force. It was his baby.
Thomas put the panels back on the sky car and stood off to admire
it. It was a neat job, just what the public wanted. The urge to get in
and drive was a most compelling one, and Thomas succumbed. He
sat for a moment, inspecting the dashboard until he had the pattern
well set. Then he snapped on the power, took the wheel and pulled
back gently. The sky car lifted its nose slightly, and as Thomas
pressed the foot pedal, it took off on a side-line straight into the sky.
He leveled off at a thousand feet and he did some scurrying back
and forth in midair. It did handle a little sloppy but not enough to
make the physicist uncomfortable. Yet it wouldn't stand any hedge-
hopping or bridge-undercutting without a prayer on the part of the
driver. Butter the controls a bit and you could thread a needle with it
on the first try.
Yes, the engineer had done it again—all of which made Thomas
chuckle. A bit more of this and the engineer would have such an
income that he'd no longer worry himself into engineering. Then—
Thomas turned the sky car and drove across the city toward Dr.
Hamilton's place. He landed on the psychiatrist's lawn and startled
the doctor out of a week's growth.
"I've won," he told the doctor.
"Good," laughed Hamilton. "Mind if I ask which you are today—and
how do you know you've won?"
"I'm Thomas Lionel, Ph.D. And the engineer has worked himself out
of a job."
"Interesting. But how?"
"He dropped me a mess of cockeyed data, remember? Well, I
unraveled it into a most interesting field of science. From it I handed
him a slab full of theories and experiments that are just inefficient
enough to make him fume. He's come up with several things that
make money in vatfuls."
"That, I know and understand. Go on."
"Remember, I am his ideal personality, I am a physicist, a type of
person he has always wanted to be. He couldn't be a physicist
because of financial reasons and so he went into the engineering
field to bolster up his bank account. That was eminently practical.
But now that the worry about the bankroll is over, he can turn to
theoretical physics and physical research. That's me—and I've won!"
"Suppose he, himself, takes the gradual retreat from engineering into
physical research?"
"Um—I don't think he's capable of it. He's been too well conditioned."
"Might well be," admitted the doctor. "Well, as I said before, I'm just a
referee. Both of you are well adjusted and good, worthy additions to
society. Either one of you that wins will be a credit to civilization."
"You're a great help," laughed Thomas. "But I don't mind. This is my
round, and it's my game. He's licked himself."
"I'll tell him that when I see him," said Dr. Hamilton. "But there is one
thing that I must know. I want to know what makes that little tungsten
box work."
"I cast the tungsten in—"
"I don't care how you made it," said Hamilton flatly, "unless it has a
definite bearing on how it works."
"I made it of tungsten because the engineer would rip it apart if it
weren't too tough," grinned Thomas. "Being of tungsten it doesn't
matter how it works excepting it would have been more efficient if I'd
made it of silver."
"Look, Thomas, stay on the subject. I want to know what's with the
works."
Lionel laughed. "What's so important?"
"Look, man, I'm a psychiatrist. The functioning of the human mind is
my baby. Or," he added bitterly, "it should be. But, darn it, all we can
do is to surmise, theorize, hope and pray. We don't know what
makes schizophrenics, or manic-depressives or any of the other
mental quirks. We aren't even certain why some people are well
liked while others, of almost identical get-together are heartily
disliked. But you've come up with a little dingus that causes a switch-
over from one personality to another merely by pushing a button.
Find out why and we psychiatrists may some day get to first base in
psychoanalysis."
"Um—I suppose a real pathophone would be a help."
"Pathophone is a good word," smiled the psychiatrist, "but to dig into
a warped mind without having the erroneous impressions and false
evaluation clouding the only entry ... we'd be able to clear up almost
any mental condition. Now, how does it work?"
"I am not prepared to say. I was seeking experimental data on the
'epicenter' of the poltergeist phenomena—the poltergeist usually
manifests in the vicinity of or because of some central influence—
usually a person who is unaware of his potentiality. At any rate, I was
setting up a series of local magnetic and electrostatic fields and then
trying the micro-microwave spectrum for response. I was running up
through the region between long heat radiation and micro-micro
radio waves when—blooey!—I was the engineer. I switched back
eventually and consolidated my findings into that little tungsten box."
"I want the dope on it."
"I'll give it to you," nodded Thomas. "As soon as I make some final
measurements and consolidate my data."
"Fine. Mind telling me what causes the poltergeist?"
"As best I can. The present concept of space is that space itself is
under internal strain. Force vectors in cancellation prevail, resulting
in a stable continuum. Space is warped by electrostatic effects,
magnetic effects, and gravitic effects. These local effects do not
create a discontinuity in the space strain, and therefore no eruption
takes place. Now enters the epicenter. Radiation from his mind or
brain in thinking goes out and starts a very minor sympathetic
oscillation in the warps and strains of space. If these strains are in
the right vectorial situation, the minor oscillation builds up the
response amplitude—"
"That doesn't make sense," objected the doctor. "Mental radiation
must be weak. How can it induce high power?"
"It can't. But if you know radio at all, you'll recall that a high 'Q' circuit
will develop very high voltages across the terminals with a very small
driving voltage. Well, this is analogous to the epicenter effect. The
epicenter wave causes instability in the space strains because the
brain wave is not a natural phenomena of space. Then—like two
sticks end to end under compression, it takes very little sidewise
thrust to make the compression-force collapse, forcing the sticks out
at right angles. Follow?"
"But where did this energy or force come from?" puzzled Hamilton.
"Isn't that a violation of the Law of Conservation of Energy?"
"Not at all. The law is still valid. It does state that you cannot get
more out of anything than is put into it. The guesswork comes in
deciding how the energy got there. Coal, for instance, is just a black
stone. It has potential energy which was put into it by the eons of
solar energy shining on the carboniferous forests. A stone has
potential energy for falling. Where did it get it? It may have been
carried up the hill; it may have been dropped from space—put out
there by the cosmic eruption that caused Creation. Or it may have
been on the edge of a gully and the potential drop made by the
stream eroding the ground out from under it."
"How about atomic power?"
"You mean, how did the power get locked in the atom?"
"Yes."
"The power in the atom was put there by the universe's atom
factories. Sol, and the other suns," explained Hamilton.
"But where did the earth—?"
"Creation," murmured Thomas. "Who knows? I don't. Every time
somebody comes up with a perfect answer, someone else comes up
with perfect data that proves that the answer couldn't be anything
that anybody has ever used before.
"The atom factory is the Solar Phoenix. You start with hydrogen and
carbon. The solar heat is such that they combine atomically to an
unstable isotope of nitrogen which immediately becomes a stable
isotope of nitrogen. More hydrogen gets in, making it unstable
oxygen and so forth. Oxygen breaks down, releasing energy, helium,
and, what do you know, carbon again, which begins to take on
hydrogen again, and here we go again. But the thing is uncontrolled
hell on wheels. Things go wrong due to the variances of pressure
and temperature, and the oxygen doesn't always break down into
helium and carbon. It takes offshoots and sidetracks. It'll add
hydrogen and become fluorine, for instance, which then adds more
and becomes something else, some of which trails off like the
branches of a tree and do not break down into recurrent reactions.
Hence the other atoms."
"I'll read about it and get the real picture. Know a good book?"
Thomas scratched his chin. "If you can find a copy of 'The Days of
Creation,' by Willy Ley, the first part of the book has a description of
the Solar Phoenix."
"Well, good enough," said Dr. Hamilton. "But just bear one thing in
mind. You think you've beaten the engineer. Your basic trouble is just
that the engineer is you, too. He has your ability and your knowledge
and your experience upon which to work. He is no fool, and you can
take that as a back-handed compliment if you want to. He is just as
capable an engineer as you are a physicist. He thinks in different
channels, I will admit. But, Thomas, remember that his extra-
channellar thinking is done with the same thinking equipment as
yours is, and it is no less efficient because of being divergent from
your own thought-track. Your battle was won too easily to be
conclusive."
"What do you expect?"
"I wouldn't know. I'm no scientist in physics." Hamilton held up a
hand as Thomas started to protest. "I use 'scientist' despite your
dislike of the word only because there is no term that describes both
of the attributes of practical engineer and research physicist. Frankly,
I'm hoping for an eventual coalition, but I fear not."
"Why view no-coalition with distaste?" demanded Thomas.
"Because both personalities offer much to the world, to science in
general, and to the body that houses both of them."
"I heartily dislike all aspects of practical engineering," stated Thomas
flatly. "To be everlastingly forced to retrace your own steps, again
and again and again, working out the most insignificant details—
bah!"
"The engineer has another viewpoint."
"I know. But the engineer in this case is here only because of his
own necessity—which he himself has removed. I am the real entity; I
am the desire of the engineer. I am what he wants to be. I am what
he will become!"