Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 8 Internal Auditing
Group 8 Internal Auditing
● Manuals and directives: Obtain copies of policy and procedure manuals and relevant
data from online systems. Study applicable laws, regulations, and management
directives. Screen correspondence files for relevant materials.
● Reports: Analyze relevant management reports and meeting minutes for insights into
budgeting, operations, cost studies, personnel matters, and external inspections or
reviews. These reports may provide leads for the audit and summarize problems,
recommendations, and progress.
● Personal observations: Conduct a tour or walk-through of the activity to familiarize
auditors with the entity, its operations, personnel, and space utilization. Document
impressions and observe compliance with company procedures.
● Discussions with key personnel: Engage in discussions with key personnel to identify
known problems, current operational results, and planned changes or reorganizations.
Ask questions based on preliminary data or tour observations
Documenting the Internal Audit Field Survey
Field survey is the initial stage of an audit, conducted over one or two days at the audit site.
The findings are documented in audit workpapers, including key reports, interview
summaries, and the creation of flowcharts for relevant systems or processes. Flowcharts are
crucial for illustrating system complexity and control points, supporting internal control
documentation for compliance, such as SOx Section 404. Proficiency in using software tools
to create flowcharts should be mastered by every internal auditor.
An audit programme is a process that outlines the actions and examinations the auditor must do when
conducting fieldwork.Prior to beginning the real audit, the programme should be completed after the
preliminary and field surveys are finished. It should be built with a number of considerations, the
primary being that the programme should pinpoint the areas that need further investigation and the
sensitive regions that demand audit focus.
An audit program's ability to mentor both inexperienced and seasoned internal auditors is a second
key goal. Management might, for instance, ask internal audit to watch as a physical inventory is taken
once a year.
The most popular internal audit format in the past was the checklist style audit programme. An audit
programme consisting of a lengthy list of questions with "yes," "no," or "not applicable" responses is
frequently presented to a less experienced internal auditor. The internal auditor would then finish the
programme stages by looking through documents or by conducting interviews. The audit program's
questionnaire format also has a tendency to make the auditor forget to look through pertinent evidence
when posing the questions.
All of the data that an internal auditor examines or witnesses is included in this data, which is known
as audit evidence. To support their assessment, the internal auditor should collect audit evidence, or
what internal audit standards refer to as adequate, knowledgeable, pertinent, and helpful audit
evidence.
● Changing audit protocols to run extra tests in different domains. But this kind of adjustment
should only be done carefully. It might be required to reconstruct the missing balances if there
was a compelling reason to choose the now-lost file, such as the requirement to link it to
additional data.
● Finishing the audit in the absence of the missing data file. The incapacity of internal audit to
carry out the scheduled tests would be revealed by the workpapers and the final report.
Internal audit management should always give their approval before using this strategy,
according to the in-charge auditor.
● Rearranging a later visit to conduct tests and finishing up the remaining aspects of the audit.
(This is the only choice available if it is not possible to reconstruct the missing data file or if
another data cycle would suffice.) Naturally, management needs to be made aware of audit
budget overruns resulting from this issue.
For many field audits, issues of this kind or ones comparable to them may arise. It is crucial that these
issues are found and fixed as soon as feasible throughout the audit. Management should be notified at
the proper levels if the internal audit team encounters complete noncooperation in order to address the
issue. It is important for both internal auditors and auditees to never forget that they are both parts of
the same larger organisation with similar ultimate objectives and interests.
The lead auditor should get help as quickly as feasible if the audit team is unfamiliar with a technical
issue. To provide an answer, an internal audit supervisor or specialist might need to investigate the
audit or technical problem. In other cases, it could be required to send an internal audit specialist with
relevant experience to the field site in order to address the issue. But most internal audit departments
don't have resident experts on hand to fly out to the field site and fix problems; instead, problems are
usually resolved over the phone, via email, or through the sharing of documents.
Internal audit management should assess the audit's progress and offer technical guidance through
visits and communications if the audit covers a large amount of ground or requires a high level of
resources. These evaluations are an addition to the field staff member who is in-charge of the auditing
process. The scale of the review, the experience of the designated staff, and the criticality of the
review will all influence how frequently and in what ways these visits occur. If communication
channels are good, a medium-sized assessment overseen by an experienced in-charge auditor covering
known regions might not need a management review. However, an experienced member of audit
management should periodically visit the fieldwork project if the audit covers a vital area, if a new
programme or new procedures are utilised, or if the assigned in-charge auditor has insufficient
experience in the area evaluated.
An internal auditor should prepare a brief explanation of the conditions encountered, prospective findings, and
recommendations if they find a potential audit defect.
Although a preliminary audit finding's contents can change based on the requirements of the specific internal
audit, they usually include the following components:
● Determination of the results. This is merely an audit identification number and an explanation of the
possible results.
● The audit's completion conditions. Although the description is typically brief, it is adequate to let local
management comprehend the conditions that have been observed.
● Allusions to the audit work that is documented. Cross-references to the audit programme step that
prompted the comment and the audit workpapers' documentation of it should be included in the audit
point sheet.
● Initial recommendations from the auditor. The nature of the possible audit finding and the errors should
be documented in the audit report space. This could serve as the foundation for a future audit report
conclusion. Here could be some notes on possible remedial actions suggested by the auditors.
● The outcomes of the management discussion of the findings. All possible results should be discussed
informally between the management immediately in charge of the matter and the in-charge auditor.
This is the place to record the discussion's outcomes.
● Proposed resolution of the issue. The in-charge auditor should provide feedback on the suggested
handling of the findings based on their discussion with management.
Modifications to audit programmes are most often required when internal audit has created a standard audit
programme that can be applied to evaluations of units that are comparable but not identical. For instance, if a
company had several autonomous production units, each with its own purchasing department, an audit
programme might have been created to address controls over the purchasing function. The overall internal
control principles and organisation policy should be reflected in those purchasing function audit programmes.
However, because of regional variations, some of the procedures in this audit programme might not apply to a
particular purchasing area that is being examined. Any such measures that are omitted from the specific audit
programme ought to be authorised and the rationale for doing so should be recorded.
During the audit, unit management should analyse potential audit findings to make sure they are accurate and
seem serious. These possible results should be examined at various stages during the review, depending on the
size and breadth of the audit. When an audit is planned over several weeks, the lead auditor may arrange a
meeting with the unit management at the conclusion of each week to go over all the findings that came to light
during that week. If the results are only procedural in nature, management can act immediately to make the
required corrections. In the audit report's final draft, they can then be downplayed or removed. The lead auditor
should examine any additional findings to ensure that they are related to operational effectiveness and that cost
savings are identified and appropriately reported.
To identify and address any notable deviations, the audit's actual performance should be tracked and compared
to time- and cost-based budgets that have been set. Plans should also be used to monitor important project
milestones like the completion of fieldwork or the draft audit report. The formal audit report, complete with its
conclusions and recommendations, is, of course, the most significant internal audit work product. It is sent to the
audit committee and the auditee upon completion of the review. Internal audit management should further
summarise the time spent on each particular audit project in order to give a comprehensive overview of all
scheduled or ongoing audits. Budgets for audit time should be closely watched for increases, and any variances
should be explained with a plan for remedial action.
8.8 PERFORMING AN INDIVIDUAL INTERNAL AUDIT
The reported findings of the in-depth audits carried out in the field or as part of general operations are the most
significant values that the internal audit process offers to the audit committee and management. This internal
audit process includes gathering preliminary evidence, conducting the audit, and presenting preliminary results
to management.