Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Ebook PDF) (Ebook PDF) Advance Nuclear Chemistry by DR Rudra Narayan All Chapter
(Ebook PDF) (Ebook PDF) Advance Nuclear Chemistry by DR Rudra Narayan All Chapter
(Ebook PDF) (Ebook PDF) Advance Nuclear Chemistry by DR Rudra Narayan All Chapter
https://ebooksecure.com/download/progress-in-heterocyclic-
chemistry-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/general-organic-and-biological-
chemistry-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/organometallic-chemistry-of-
five-membered-heterocycles-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-essentials-of-business-
communication-8th-by-dr-dana-loewy/
(eBook PDF) Translational Medicine in CNS Drug
Development, Volume 29
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-translational-medicine-
in-cns-drug-development-volume-29/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-introduction-to-nuclear-
engineering-4th-edition-by-john-r-lamarsh/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-global-business-
today-5th-canadian-edition-by-charles-w-l-hill-dr/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-outcome-assessment-in-
advanced-practice-nursing-4th-edition-by-dr-ruth-m-kleinpell/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/nuclear-cardiology-practical-
applications-4th-edition-ebook-pdf/
Advance Nuclear Chemistry
Advance Nuclear Chemistry
CENTRUM PRESS
NEW DELHI-110002 (INDIA)
CENTRUM PRESS
H.O.: 4360/4, Ansari Road, Daryaganj,
New Delhi-110002 (India)
Tel: 23278000, 23261597, 23255577, 23286875
Email: centrumpress@gmail.com
Visit us at: www.centrumpress.com
© Reserved
ISBN 978-93-5084-887-6
PRINTED IN INDIA
Printed at Replika Press Pvt. Ltd., Sonipat, Haryana
Contents
Preface
1. Molecular Bonding in Nuclear Atoms
2. Modern Atomic Theory in Chemistry
3. Chemical Elements of Atom
4. Quantized Nature of Electrons in Atom
5. Nature of Electrons in Atom
6. Electron Configuration in Atomic Orbitals
7. Ionizing Radiation: Sources and Effects
8. Wave-Particle Duality
Bibliography
Preface
Nuclear chemistry is the study of the chemical and physical properties of elements as
influenced by changes in the structure of the atomic nucleus. Modern nuclear chemistry,
sometimes referred to as radiochemistry, has become very interdisciplinary in its
applications, ranging from the study of the formation of the elements in the universe to the
design of radioactive drugs for diagnostic medicine. In fact, the chemical techniques
pioneered by nuclear chemists have become so important that biologists, geologists, and
physicists use nuclear chemistry as ordinary tools of their disciplines. While the common
perception is that nuclear chemistry involves only the study of radioactive nuclei, advances in
modern mass spectrometry instrumentation has made chemical studies using stable,
nonradioactive isotopes increasingly important. There are essentially three sources of
radioactive elements. Primordial nuclides are radioactive elements whose half-lives are
comparable to the age of our solar system and were present at the formation of Earth. These
nuclides are generally referred to as naturally occurring radioactivity and are derived from
the radioactive decay of thorium and uranium. Cosmogenic nuclides are atoms that are
constantly being synthesized from the bombardment of planetary surfaces by cosmic particles
(primarily protons ejected from the Sun), and are also considered natural in their origin. The
third source of radioactive nuclides is termed anthropogenic and results from human activity
in the production of nuclear power, nuclear weapons, or through the use of particle
accelerators.
Some methods first developed within nuclear chemistry and physics have become so
widely used within chemistry and other physical sciences that they may be best thought of as
separate from normal nuclear chemistry. For example, the isotope effect is used so
extensively to investigate chemical mechanisms and the use of cosmogenic isotopes and long-
lived unstable isotopes in geology that it is best to consider much of isotopic chemistry as
separate from nuclear chemistry. Another important area of nuclear chemistry is the study of
how fission products interact with surfaces; this is thought to control the rate of release and
migration of fission products both from waste containers under normal conditions and from
power reactors under accident conditions. It is interesting to note that, like chromate and
molybdate, the 99TcO4 anion can react with steel surfaces to form a corrosion resistant layer.
NMR spectroscopy uses the net spin of nuclei in a substance upon energy absorption to
identify molecules. This has now become a standard spectroscopic tool within synthetic
chemistry. One major use of NMR is to determine the bond connectivity within an organic
molecule. NMR imaging also uses the net spin of nuclei (commonly protons) for imaging.
This is widely used for diagnostic purposes in medicine, and can provide detailed images of
the inside of a person without inflicting any radiation upon them. In a medical setting, NMR is
often known simply as “magnetic resonance” imaging, as the word ‘nuclear’ has negative
connotations for many people.
The present book covers all of the chemical aspects of nuclear science starting from the
physical basics and including such diverse areas as the chemistry of transactinides and exotic
atoms as well as radioactive waste management and radiopharmaceutical chemistry relevant
to nuclear medicine. The will be a valuable resource guide for nuclear scientists, biologists,
chemists, physicists, physicians practicing nuclear medicine, graduate students and teachers
involved in the chemical and radiopharmaceutical aspects of nuclear science.
Chemical Bond
You probably learned some time ago that chemical bonds are what hold atoms together to
form the more complicated aggregates that we know as molecules and extended solids.
Chemists talk about bonds all the time, and draw pictures of them as lines joining atom
symbols. Teachers often identify them as the little sticks that connect the spheres that represent
atoms in a plastic molecular model. So it’s not surprising that we sometimes tend to think of
chemical bonds as “things”. But no one has ever seen a chemical bond, and there is no reason
to believe that they really even exist as physical objects.
“Sometimes It Seems to me that a bond between two atoms has become so real,
so tangible, so friendly, that I can almost see it. Then I awake with a little
shock, for a chemical bond is not a real thing. It does not exist. No one has
ever seen one. No one ever can. It is a figment of our own imagination.”
C.A. Coulson (1910-1974) was an English theoretical chemist who played a central role
in the development of quantum theories of chemical bonding.
It is more useful to regard a chemical bond as an effect that causes certain atoms to join
together to form enduring structures that have unique physical and chemical properties. So
although the “chemical bond” is no more than a convenient fiction, chemical bonding, which
leads to the near-infinity of substances (31 million in mid-2007), lies at the very core of
chemistry.
The forces that hold bonded atoms together are basically just the same kinds of
electrostatic attractions that bind the electrons of an atom to its positively-charged nucleus.
This is the most important fact about chemical bonding that you should know, but it is not of
itself a workable theory of bonding because it does not describe the conditions under which
bonding occurs, nor does it make useful predictions about the properties of the bonded atoms.
Our views of what constitutes chemical bonding are still evolving, according to a 2007
article in Chemical and Engineering News (85 37-40). This “buckyball-and-mitt”
synthesized in 2007 by Andrzej Sygula is a case in point. The buckyball C60 resides in the
C60H28 “buckybowl”. There are no traditional “chemical bonds” here!
Molecule
A more restrictive definition distinguishes between a “true” molecule that exists as an
independent particle, and an extended solid that can only be represented by its simplest
formula. Methane, CH4, is an example of the former, while sodium chloride, which does not
contain any discrete NaCl units, is the most widely-known extended solid. But because we
want to look at chemical bonding in the most general way, we will avoid making this
distinction here except in a few special cases. In order to emphasize this “aggregate of atoms”
definition, we will often use terms such as “chemical species” and “structures” in place of
“molecules” in this lesson.
The definition written above is an operational one; that is, it depends on our ability to
observe and measure the molecule’s properties. Clearly, this means that the molecule must
retain its identity for a period of time long enough to carry out the measurements. For most of
the molecules that chemistry deals with, this presents no difficulty. But it does happen that
some structures that we can write formulas for, such as He2, have such brief lives that no
significant properties have been observed. So to some extent, what we consider to be a
molecule depends on the technology we use to observe them, and this will necessarily change
with time.
Structure
And what are those properties that characterize a particular kind of molecule and
distinguish it from others? Just as real estate is judged by “location, location, location”, the
identity of a chemical species is defined by its structure. In its most fundamental sense, the
structure of a molecule is specified by the identity of its constituent atoms and the sequence in
which they are joined together, that is, by the bonding connectivity. This, in turn, defines the
bonding geometry— the spatial relationship between the bonded atoms.
The importance of bonding connectivity is nicely illustrated by the structures of the two
compounds ethanol and dimethyl ether, both of which have the simplest formula C2H6O. The
structural formulas reveal the very different connectivities of these two molecules whose
physical and chemistry properties are quite different:
Chemical Structures
Chemical species are traditionally represented by structural formulas such as the one
for ascorbic acid (vitamin C) which we show here. The lines, of course, represent the
“chemical bonds” of the molecule. More importantly, the structural formula of a molecule
defines its connectivity, as was illustrated in the comparison of ethanol and dimethyl ether
shown above.
One limitation of such formulas is that they are drawn on a two-dimensional paper or
screen, whereas most molecules have a three-dimensional shape. The wedge-shaped lines in
the structural formula are one way of indicating which bonds extend above or below the
viewing plane. You will probably be spared having to learn this convention until you get into
second-year Chemistry.
But what would a molecule “really” look like if you could view it through a magical
microscope of some kind? A possible answer would be this computer-generated view of
nicotine. At first you might think it looks more like a piece of abstract sculpture than a
molecule, but it does reveal the shape of the negative charge-cloud that envelops the
collection of atom cores and nuclei hidden within. This can be very important for
understanding how the molecule interacts with the similar charge-clouds that clothe solvent
and bioreceptor molecules.
The purpose of rendering a molecular structure in a particular way is not to achieve
“realism” (whatever that might be), but rather to convey useful information of some kind.
Modern computer rendering software takes its basic data from various kinds of standard
structural databases which are compiled either from experimental X-ray scattering data, or
are calculated from theory.
As was mentioned above, it is often desirable to show the “molecular surface”— the veil
of negative charge that originates in the valence electrons of the atoms but which tends to be
spread over the entire molecule to a distance that can significantly affect van der Waals
interactions with neighboring molecules. It is often helpful to superimpose images
representing the atoms within the molecule, scaled to their average covalent radii, and to
draw the “bonding lines” expressing their connectivity.
Knowing the properties of molecular surfaces is vitally important to understanding any
process that depends on one molecule remaining in physical contact with another. Catalysis is
one example, but one of the main interests at the present time is biological signalling, in
which a relatively small molecule binds to or “docks” with a receptor site on a much larger
one, often a protein. Sophisticated molecular modelling software such as was used to produce
these images is now a major tool in many areas of research biology.
Visualizing very large molecules such as carbohydrates and proteins that may contain
tens of thousands of atoms presents obvious problems. The usual technique is to simplify the
major parts of the molecule, representing major kinds of extended structural units by shapes
such as ribbons or tubes which are twisted or bent to approximate their conformations. These
are then gathered to reveal the geometrical relations of the various units within the overall
structure. Individual atoms, if shown at all, are restricted to those of special interest.
Some of these images can stand as artistic creations in their own right. This seems to be
especially true of those that render special aspects of molecular surfaces; the two on the left
below could well be mistaken for paintings by Jean Mirο and Salvador Dalí, respectively.
Study of the surface properties of large molecules is crucial for understanding how
proteins, carbohydrates, and DNA interact with smaller molcules, especially those involved
in transport of ions and small molecule across cell membranes, immune-system behavior, and
signal transduction processes such as the “turning on” of genes.
Bond Energies
The bond energy is the amount of work that must be done to pull two atoms completely
apart; in other words, it is the same as the depth of the “well” in the potential energy curve
shown above. This is almost, but not quite the same as the bond dissociation energy actually
required to break the chemical bond; the difference is the very small zero-point energy. This
relationship will be clarified below in the section on bond vibrational frequencies.
How Bond Energies are Measured
Bond energies are usually determined indirectly from thermodynamic data, but there are
two main experimental ways of measuring them directly: The direct thermochemical
methodinvolves separating the two atoms by an electrical discharge or some other means, and
then measuring the heat given off when they recombine. Thus the energy of the C—C single
bond can be estimated from the heat of the recombination reaction between methyl radicals,
yielding ethane:
CH3 + CH3 → H3C–CH3
Although this method is simple in principle, it is not easy to carry out experimentally.
The highly reactive components must be prepared in high purity and in a stream of moving
gas.
The spectroscopic methodis based on the principle that absorption of light whose
wavelength corresponds to the bond energy will often lead to the breaking of the bond and
dissociation of the molecule. For some bonds, this light falls into the green and blue regions
of the spectrum, but for most bonds ultraviolet light is required. The experiment is carried out
by observing the absorption of light by the substance being studied as the wavelength is
decreased. When the wavelength is sufficiently small to break the bond, a characteristic
change in the absorption pattern is observed. Spectroscopy is quite easily carried out and can
yield highly precise results, but this method is only applicable to a relatively small number of
simple molecules.
The major problem is that the light must first be absorbed by the molecule, and relatively
few molecules happen to absorb light of a wavelength that corresponds to a bond energy.
Experiments carried out on diatomic molecules such as O2 and CS yield unambiguous values
of bond energy, but for more complex molecules there are complications.
For example, the heat given off in the CH3 combination reaction written above will also
include a small component that represents the differences in the energies of the C-H bonds in
methyl and in ethane. These can be corrected for by experimental data on reactions such as:
CH3 + H → CH4
CH2 + H → CH3
By assembling a large amount of experimental information of this kind, a consistent set of
average bond energies can be obtained. The energies of double bonds are greater than those
of single bonds, and those of triple bonds are higher still.
Use of Bond Energies in Estimating Heats of Reaction
One can often get a very good idea of how much heat will be absorbed or given off in a
reaction by simply finding the difference in the total bond energies contained in the reactants
and products. The strength of an individual bond such as O–H depends to some extent on its
environment in a molecule (that is, in this example, on what other atom is connected to the
oxygen atom), but tables of “average” energies of the various common bond types are widely
available and can provide useful estimates of the quantity of heat absorbed or released in
many chemical reaction.
As an example, consider the reaction of chlorine with methane to produce
dichloromethane and hydrogen chloride:
CH4(g) + 2 Cl2(g) → CH2Cl2(g) + 2 HCl(g)
In this reaction, two C–H bonds and two Cl–Cl bonds are broken, and two new C–H and
H–Cl bonds are formed. The net change associated with the reaction is 2(C–H) + 2(Cl–Cl) –
2(C–Cl) – 2(H–Cl) = (830 + 486 -660-864) kJ which comes to –208 kJ per mole of methane;
this agrees quite well with the observed heat of reaction, which is – 202 kJ/mol.
Bond Lengths and Angles
Bond lengths are affected by the sizes of the atoms; thus those involving hydrogen can be
quite short. The shortest bond of all, H– H, is only 74 pm. Multiply-bonded atoms are closer
together than singly-bonded ones; this is a major criterion for experimentally determining the
multiplicity of a bond.
Bond lengths depend mainly on the sizes of the atoms, and secondarily on the bond
strengths, the stronger bonds tending to be shorter. Bonds involving hydrogen can be quite
short; The shortest bond of all, H–H, is only 74 pm. Multiply-bonded atoms are closer
together than singly-bonded ones; this is a major criterion for experimentally determining the
multiplicity of a bond. This trend is clearly evident in the above plot which depicts the
sequence of carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds.
The most common method of measuring bond lengths in solids is by analysis of the
diffraction or scattering of X-rays when they pass through the regularly-spaced atoms in the
crystal. For gaseous molecules, neutron- or electron-diffraction can also be used.
The complete structure of a molecule requires a specification of the coordinates of each
of its atoms in three-dimensional space. This data can then be used by computer programs to
construct visualizations of the molecule as discussed above. One such visualization of the
water molecule, with bond distances and the HOH bond angle superimposed on a space-
filling model, is shown here. (It is taken from an excellent reference source on water). The
colors show the results of calculations that depict the way in which electron charge is
distributed around the three nuclei.
Solid-state Chemistry
Solid-state chemistry is the study of the synthesis, structure, and physical properties of
solid materials. It therefore has a strong overlap with solid-state physics, mineralogy,
crystallography, ceramics, metallurgy, thermodynamics, materials science and electronics
with a focus on the synthesis of novel materials and their characterization.
History
Because of its direct relevance to products of commerce, solid state inorganic chemistry
has been strongly driven by technology well in advance of atomic-level descriptions or in the
academic studies. Applications discovered in the 20th century include zeolite and platinum-
based catalysts for petroleum processing in the 1950’s, high-purity silicon as a core
component of microelectronic devices in the 1960’s, and “high temperature”
superconductivity in the 1980’s. The invention of X-ray crystallography in the early 1900s by
William Lawrence Bragg enabled further innovation.
Synthetic Methods
Given the diversity of solid state compounds, an equally diverse array of methods are
used for their preparation. For organic materials, such as charge transfer salts, the methods
operate near room temperature and are often similar to the techniques of organic synthesis.
Redox reactions are sometimes conducted by electrocrystallisation, as illustrated by the
preparation of the Bechgaard salts from tetrathiafulvalene.
Oven Techniques
For thermally robust materials, high temperature methods are often employed. For
example, bulk solids are prepared using tube furnaces, which allow reactions to be conducted
up to ca. 1100 °C. Special equipment e.g. ovens consisting of a tantalum tube through which
an electric current is passed can be used for even higher temperatures up to 2000 °C. Such
high temperatures are at times required to induce diffusion of the reactants, but this depends
strongly on the system studied. Some solid state reactions already proceed at temperatures as
low as 100 °C.
Melt Methods
One method often employed is to melt the reactants together and then later anneal the
solidified melt. If volatile reactants are involved the reactants are often put in an ampoule that
is evacuated -often while keeping the reactant mixture cold e.g. by keeping the bottom of the
ampoule in liquid nitrogen- and then sealed. The sealed ampoule is then put in an oven and
given a certain heat treatment.
Solution Methods
It is possible to use solvents to prepare solids by precipitation or by evaporation. At
times the solvent is used hydrothermally, i.e. under pressure at temperatures higher than the
normal boiling point. A variation on this theme is the use of flux methods, where a salt of
relatively low melting point is added to the mixture to act as a high temperature solvent in
which the desired reaction can take place.
Gas Reactions
Many solids react readily with reactive gas species like chlorine, iodine, oxygen etc.
Others form adducts with other gases, e.g. CO or ethylene. Such reactions are often carried
out in a tube that is open ended on both sides and through which the gas is passed. A variation
of this is to let the reaction take place inside a measuring device such as a TGA. In that case
stoechimetric information can be obtained during the reaction, which helps identify the
products.
A special case of a gas reaction is a chemical transport reaction. These are often carried
out in a sealed ampoule to with a small amount of a transport agent, e.g. iodine is added. The
ampoule is then placed in a zone oven. This is essentially two tube ovens attached to each
other which allows a temperature grandient to be imposed. Such a method can be used to
obtain the product in the form of single crystals suitable for structure determination by X-ray
diffraction. Chemical vapour deposition is a high temperature method that is widely
employed for the preparation of coatings and semiconductors from molecular precursors.
Air and Moisture Sensitive Materials
Many solids are hygroscopic and/or oxygen sensitive. Many halides e.g. are very ‘thirsty’
and can only be studied in their anhydrous form if they are handled in a glove box filled with
dry (and/or oxygen-free) gas, usually nitrogen.
Characterization
New Phases, Phase Diagrams, Structures
The synthetic methodology and the characterization of the product often go hand in hand
in the sense that not one but a series of reaction mixtures are prepared and subjected to heat
treatment. The stoichiometry is typically varied in a systematic way to find which
stoichiometries will lead to new solid compounds or to solid solutions between known ones.
A prime method to characterize the reaction products is powder diffraction, because many
solid state reactions will produce polycristalline ingots or powders. Powder diffraction will
facilitate the identification of known phases in the mixture. If a pattern is found that is not
known in the diffraction data libraries an attempt can be made to index the pattern, i.e. to
identify the symmetry and the size of the unit cell. (If the product is not crystalline the
characterization is typically much more difficult.)
Once the unit cell of a new phase is known, the next step is to establish the stoichiometry
of the phase. This can be done in a number of ways. Sometimes the composition of the
original mixture will give a clue, if one finds only one product -a single powder pattern- or if
one was trying to make a phase of a certain composition by analogy to known materials but
this is rare.
Often considerable effort in refining the synthetic methodology is required to obtain a
pure sample of the new material. If it is possible to separate the product from the rest of the
reaction mixture elemental analysis can be used. Another ways involves SEM and the
generation of characteristic X-rays in the electron beam. The easiest way is to solve the
structure is by using single crystal X-ray diffraction.
The latter often requires revisiting and refining the preparative procedures and that is
linked to the question which phases are stable at what composition and what stoichiometry. In
other words what does the phase diagram looks like. An important tool in establishing this is
thermal analysis techniques like DSC or DTA and increasingly also, thanks to the advent of
synchrotrons temperature-dependent power diffraction.
Increased knowledge of the phase relations often leads to further refinement in synthetic
procedures in an iterative way. New phases are thus characterized by their melting points and
their stoichiometric domains. The latter is important for the many solids that are non-
stoichiometric compounds. The cell parameters obtained from XRD are particularly helpful
to characterize the homogeneity ranges of the latter.
Further Characterization
In many -but certainly not all- cases new solid compounds are further characterized by a
variety of techniques that straddle the fine line that (hardly) separates solid-state chemistry
from solid-state physics.
Optical Properties
For nonmetallic materials it is often possible to obtain UV/VIS spectra. In the case of
semiconductors that will give an idea of the band gap.
Electrical Properties
Four-point (or five-point) probe methods are often applied either to ingots, crystals or
pressed pellets to measure resistivity and the size of the Hall-effect. This gives information
on whether the compound is an insulator, semiconductor, semimetal or metal and upon the
type of doping and the mobility in the delocalized bands (if present). Thus important
information is obtained on the chemical bonding in the material.
Magnetic Properties
Magnetic susceptibility can be measured as function of temperature to establish whether
the material is a para-, ferro- or antiferro-magnet. Again the information obtained pertains to
the bonding in the material. This is particularly important for transition metal compounds. In
the case of magnetic order neutron diffraction can be used to determine the magnetic structure.
Electron Pairs in Solid State Chemistry
Chemists like the concept of electron pairs since the early days of Lewis. Bonding and
nonbonding electron pairs are the basis to argue about shapes of molecules and characteristic
coordinations in solids.
Stabilization of a complex cluster unit by a single multi-centre electron pair-this is, in
condensed form, the essential type of chemical bonding in the recently discovered cluster
compounds ATh12N6X29 (A = Li,...,Rb; X = Cl, Br). While all of them contain a hitherto
unknown cluster type that is built up from twelve metal atoms.
The first one relies on (i) six nitrogen-centered thorium tetrahedra [Th4N] which are
condensed via edges in a cyclic manner, while the second one focuses on (ii) an empty
octahedron of thorium atoms [Th6] that is capped by six additional thorium atoms but leaving
two opposite faces open. The resulting tetrahedral voids are filled by nitrogen atoms. In any
case, this star-shaped cluster is coordinated by a total of 41 halogen atoms in a rather
complex way, furthermore interconnecting the individual cluster units in a variety of different
and complex modes.
The solid state structures of chlorides and bromides exhibit remarkable differences with
respect to both lattice symmetry as well as halide substructure, however, the cluster units
[Th12N6 X41]13-themselves are almost identical. One reason for this finding is already
indicated by a rather primitive electron count for the “ionic limit” according to A+ (Th4+)12
(N3-)6 (X-)29, yielding a surplus of (1+48-18-29=)2 electrons that are available for metal-
metal bonding.
Molecular orbital calculations both confirm and further clarify this description. In
addition to strongly ionic Th-N and Th-(Cl, Br) bonds, there is a significant contribution of
covalent bonding between thorium atoms detectable, and it is associated with an energetically
well-separated highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of a1g symmetry. It is evident that
only 6d atomic orbitals from the central thorium atoms mix strongly into this molecular
orbital, incorporating the two “surplus” electrons and thus stabilizing the entire cluster unit by
the formation of a six-centre two-electron bond. Besides this multi-centre orbital, the
electronic structure of these clusters parallels the pattern found in other nitride halide
compounds with similar tetrahedral arrangements. The cyclic condensation of the tetrahedra
inevitably leads to the formation of this additional orbital (and vice versa), being essential
for the stability of these compounds.
Also, an application of topological counting rules illustrates this finding. Such empirical
rules are surprisingly successful for the description of molecular cluster compounds (and thus
widely used in the chemical literature).
They provide simple formulae to estimate so-called “magic” numbers for optimum
stability of various geometrical fragments. For example, if the central octahedron of the
cluster unit is not explicitly accounted for, e.g. by only counting the edges or formally
decomposing the cluster into tetrahedra, the total electron count is two electrons lower
compared to the description of a capped octahedron. In other words, the recognition of the
central octahedron as the host for multi-centre metal-metal bonding is a prerequisite for an
adequate designation of the chemical bonding in this cluster type.
Stabilization of a complex halide structure via a Jahn-Teller reduction of an excess
electron pair’s antibonding character—that is, on the other hand, the idea of chemical bonding
inside the newly characterized phase In4Br7.
In4Br7 is a member of the large family of complex indium halides, materials that are
characterized by an astonishing structural variety which may be traced back to the indium
atom’s multi-valency (mono, di-, and trivalent indium) and the possibility to mix these
valencies in varying combinations in the solid state. The more reduced (bromide) phases
deserve special attention since they are all containing In+ cations that show fairly uncommon,
strongly distorted coordination polyhedra (7-12-fold coordination with strongly widened In+-
Br- bond lengths). A naive solid-state chemical interpretation would call for “directed
electron lone-pairs” being responsible for this finding, however, band structure investigations
reveal the cause in a strongly antibonding combination between almost doubly filled, non-
directional indium 5s functions and neighboring bromine 4p hybrids. Any coordination
polyhedron giving sufficient space for In+, aside from repelling bromine-bromine
interactions, is almost equally appropriate.
Because of that antibonding excess electron pair in the indium 5s atomic orbital, the
overall bonding is weak in reduced indium bromides (and halides in general). The resulting
soft crystal potential for In+ is nicely reflected in significantly enlarged displacement factors
in all known crystal structure investigations. Moreover, energy hypersurface calculations for
the In+/Br- combination indicate that the latter one is a very good candidate for a second-
order Jahn-Teller instability.
The last prediction has now been experimentally verified for the case of trigonal In4Br7;
its crystal-chemical formulation may be described as (In3+)3(In+)5(Br-)14 = In8Br14. On the
macroscopic level, In4Br7 exhibits an extraordinarily high sensitivity (and chemical
reactivity), not only when brought into contact with air or humidity but also when subjected to
visible light and mechanical stress, followed by rapid decay.
There are, of course, the overall weak In+-Br- interactions to be accounted for this high
sensitivity; however, band structure calculations reveal that one out of three positions for
monovalent indium, characterized by a 6+6=12-fold coordination by bromine anions, is the
source of an unusual electronic instability, thereby being able to localize In4Br7’s high
reactivity to a good extent from crystallography.
The key to understanding lies in the lowest crystal orbital (LUCO, with almost pure 5px,y
character) that is centered on this particular monovalent indium cation. Because of the
LUCO’s small energetic distance from the occupied band levels, it may mix with the highest
bands (antibonding indium 5s regime) upon atomic displacement, by that reducing the total
energy.
Such an effect, equivalent to a second-order Jahn-Teller distortion, manifests at low
temperature (90 K) from the measured electron density, showing that indium no longer resides
on the crystallographic high-symmetry position but has moved away from it by roughly 40 pm.
Note that classifying this effect by assuming a nonbonding “directed electron lone-pair” is
completely erroneous. On the contrary, the atomic dislocation results from a bonding
contribution that slightly weakens the overall antibonding In+-Br- interactions close to the
Fermi energy.
Chemical Kinetics
Chemical kinetics, also known as reaction kinetics, is the study of rates of chemical
processes. Chemical kinetics includes investigations of how different experimental conditions
can influence the speed of a chemical reaction and yield information about the reaction’s
mechanism and transition states, as well as the construction of mathematical models that can
describe the characteristics of a chemical reaction.
In 1864, Peter Waage and Cato Guldberg pioneered the development of chemical kinetics
by formulating the law of mass action, which states that the speed of a chemical reaction is
proportional to the quantity of the reacting substances.
Rate of Reaction
Chemical kinetics deals with the experimental determination of reaction rates from which
rate laws and rate constants are derived. Relatively simple rate laws exist for zero order
reactions (for which reaction rates are independent of concentration), first order reactions,
and second order reactions, and can be derived for others. In consecutive reactions the rate-
determining step often determines the kinetics. In consecutive first order reactions, a steady
state approximation can simplify the rate law.
The activation energy for a reaction is experimentally determined through the Arrhenius
equation and the Eyring equation. The main factors that influence the reaction rate include: the
physical state of the reactants, the concentrations of the reactants, the temperature at which the
reaction occurs, and whether or not any catalysts are present in the reaction.
We had not noticed that the buffoon had retired, but he now re-
entered, disguised in a remarkable manner. He seemed a figure
some four feet high, with a face huge and like a full moon. This was,
in fact, carefully painted on his bare abdomen, the whole
surmounted by a gigantic turban. He had constructed a pair of false
arms, and, with a boy’s coat and large girdle, he presented the effect
of a dwarf with a huge round fat face; his head, chest, and arms
were hidden in the enormous white turban. The face represented
was one of intense and dismal stupidity, and his whole appearance
was most ludicrous; in fact, it was only on afterwards seeing the man
disrobe, that we made out how it was done.
He danced in and out among the girls, who stood in a row
snapping their fingers and posturing: but what was our astonishment
when we saw the dismally stupid face expand into a grin, which
became at length a laughing mask; it resumed its dismal stupidity—it
grinned—it laughed. The musicians played and shouted their chant
more and more loudly, and the face of the figure assumed the most
ludicrous contortions. We all were unable to restrain our laughter,
and the triumphant buffoon retired well rewarded by the Serrum-u-
dowlet. The four dancers now became rather too personal in their
attentions, and begged for coin. We gave them a few kerans, but
were glad when they retired on dinner being announced. We both
pronounced them monotonous and uninteresting.
After a heavy Persian dinner—much such a one as we had at
Merand—we, with some trouble, got away at eleven p.m. Our hosts
seemed inclined to make a very wet night of it; in fact, their frequent
acceptance of cupfuls of raw spirits from the hands of the dancers
had made them see things generally in a rosy light. They wept when
we left!
We rode home through the silent streets of Kermanshah, the only
light being our farnooses, or cylindrical lamps, made of copper and
calico, something in the fashion of a Chinese lantern; and the full
moon.
We met no one in the streets, which were deserted save by the
dogs, and the whole town seemed sunk in sleep. The Persian is an
early bird, going to bed at nine, and rising at four or half-past four. It
is very difficult to break oneself of this habit of early rising on
returning to Europe. One is looked on as very eccentric on getting up
at half-past four, and is hunted from room to room by the
housemaids. Certainly the early morning is the best part of the day
all over the world, but we Europeans in our wisdom have altered it.
“Nous avons changé tout cela”—and we prefer living by gaslight,
electricity, etc.
The next morning the Serrum-u-dowlet came over to take our
photographs, and was very friendly; he took them really well, and is
a clever fellow.
We went for a ride, and had the unwonted luxury of a two hours’
canter over good turf. I never had this anywhere else in Persia but
once. While near the river we saw plenty of duck, and Pierson told
me that they are always to be had in the Kermanshah river.
In Kermanshah I found that the grassy plain round the town had
many attractions. Some two miles’ canter on it brought me to a
swamp where there were always snipe, except in the hot weather, an
occasional duck, and even at times wild geese. A ludicrous incident
happened to me one day in regard to the latter. As I was cantering
up to the swamp with my groom, I saw on the other side of a herd of
cattle a flock of geese grazing. To dismount and take my gun from
him was the work of an instant, and I quickly inserted a cartridge
charged with No. 4, and a wire ditto, for my left barrel. I walked
stealthily among the cattle towards the flock of geese, but the game
took no notice of me, and allowed me to get within thirty yards; then
it came across me, how if these were tame geese, what a fire of
chaff I should get from Pierson. I did not think of shouting, as of
course I should have done, which would have settled the question,
but I retreated stealthily to where my groom was standing with the
horses. I saw that he was full of excitement, and felt that I had made
a fool of myself. “Shikar?” (“Are they wild ones?”) said I. “Belli, belli,
sahib!” (“Yes, yes, sir!”)
Back I went, but alas! only to be too well convinced that they were
wild ones, for the whole flock sailed away ere I could get within a
hundred and fifty yards. I have often shot geese—that is, a goose at
a time—but I never had such another chance. The birds really
behaved just as tame ones would; I can only suppose that my being
among the grazing cows I was looked upon as harmless. I did not
relate that afternoon’s adventure to Pierson for some time after.
The swamp, which was about a mile long, and at the widest parts
only five hundred yards, was in the centre impossible to cross, save
in summer, when there was no sport there. One side had not nearly
so much cover as the other, but there were no holes; the other side
was full of them, and it was only after a long time that I got
thoroughly acquainted with the geography. In after days I had a
guest who was very hot on sport of all kinds; and as the swamp was
all I could show him at the time, it was arranged that we were to
have a day there.
I, having a holy horror of wet feet, used to go in with a pair of duck
trousers and Persian shoes regardless of water, and march on
frequently up to my waist, changing on coming out. I suggested this
mode to my sporting friend, but he looked on it as very infra dig. and
unsportsmanlike, and set out in a most correct get-up of shooting-
coat with many pockets, and the usual lace-up shooting-boots.
Nothing would induce him to take a change in case of a wetting, and
off we went. As his gun had no sling—almost a necessity in Persia,
where the weapon is so frequently carried on horseback—his groom
carried it in its case.
We got to the swamp, and, knowing the place, I said, “You take the
left side—there are no holes; and I who know the holes will take the
right, which is full of them.”
But my friend was not to be led; he remarked that the right was
certainly the best side, and as guest he ought to have it. To this I of
course agreed, but I pointed out that the holes were deep and
dangerous, and that I knew them, and he did not. But, no, he
insisted. I could, of course, only give in.
The place was alive with snipe. I went to the left, or more open
side, and was over my ankles in a moment. My enthusiastic friend
was in to his knees. We blazed away, and were getting on well, when
my friend lost his ramrod. Persia being a very dry place, all wood
shrinks, and it had probably slipped out. There was nothing for it but
to take the cleaning-rod from the case and use that; the difficulty was
how to carry it, as we were firing frequently, and he didn’t want to
unscrew it. My friend had no belt, and so thrust it down his back,
between his shirt and waistcoat. We began again, and were soon in
the thick of them. We had now got to the widest part of the swamp; I
was separated from my guest by deep water-holes, and was looking
at him when with a shout he suddenly disappeared, and it was
evident he was in a water-hole. I rushed out and ran round the head
of the swamp to his assistance; the servants were out of call. When I
got there he was nearly done for; he had fallen head foremost into a
hole, and could not get out, as the reeds gave way when he pulled
them, and there was only a bottom round the edge of soft mud. The
loading-rod had somehow got down his back, and he could not get
hold of it, while it crippled him; and he had a very white face indeed
when I helped him out by holding my gun out to him. He had lost his
gun, but my groom dived and brought it out.
I wished him to canter home at once, but he did not like to be seen
in the pickle he was in—mud, green mud, from head to foot; and he
insisted on waiting till his man brought a change. This took an hour,
and the day, though bright, was cold and windy. So there he stood in
his wet clothes, his teeth chattering, trying to keep himself warm by
jumping; but his struggles in the water-hole had so weakened him
that he could hardly stand. Of course he had a severe go of
intermittent fever, which laid him up for a fortnight. In after excursions
he was content to leave me the right or dangerous side, which I from
habit was able to safely travel in.
Pierson and I visited a magnificent palace which was in course of
construction by the Imād-u-dowlet. Some idea of its size may be
given when I say that there was stabling for two hundred horses. In
Persia, when a man passes fifty, he begins to be seized with a mania
for building, but he takes care not to finish the works he undertakes,
being thoroughly persuaded of the certainty of his own death in case
of the completion of the edifice.
Some ten years after I had left Kermanshah, Imādieh—so the
place was called—was presented (I dare say much against the
grain) to the king. At that time the Imād-u-dowlet had become the
actual freeholder of the whole of the Kermanshah valley, and his
wealth was immense in money and flocks and herds. But the
inevitable evil day arrived. The Shah recalled him to Teheran, and
the squeezing process commenced; large sums of money were
wrung from him, and the royal treasury correspondingly enriched. It
is always so in Persia; a man is allowed to quietly enrich himself, but
when he has achieved immense wealth he becomes a mark for
oppression in his turn. To use the common expression of the country,
“He is ripe; he must be squeezed.”