Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Crime, Criminality and Criminal Justice 3rd Edition All Chapter

(eBook PDF) Crime, Criminality and
Criminal Justice 3rd Edition

Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-crime-criminality-and-criminal-justice-3rd-
edition/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
(eBook PDF) Multiculturalism, Crime, and Criminal

Justice
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-multiculturalism-crime-
and-criminal-justice/
(eBook PDF) Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice 5th

Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-media-crime-and-
criminal-justice-5th-edition/
(eBook PDF) A History of Crime and the American

Criminal Justice System 3rd Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-a-history-of-crime-and-
the-american-criminal-justice-system-3rd-edition/
(eBook PDF) Crime and Criminology (Aspen Criminal

Justice Series) 15th Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-crime-and-criminology-
aspen-criminal-justice-series-15th-edition/
(eBook PDF) Criminal Justice: Mainstream and
Crosscurrents 3rd Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-criminal-justice-
mainstream-and-crosscurrents-3rd-edition/
(eBook PDF) Criminal Investigation (Justice Series)

(The Justice Series) 3rd Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-criminal-investigation-
justice-series-the-justice-series-3rd-edition/
(eBook PDF) Criminal Procedure (Justice Series) (The

Justice Series) 3rd Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-criminal-procedure-
justice-series-the-justice-series-3rd-edition/
(eBook PDF) Foundations of Criminal Justice 3rd Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-foundations-of-criminal-
justice-3rd-edition/
(eBook PDF) Introduction to Criminal Justice: Practice

and Process 3rd Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-introduction-to-
criminal-justice-practice-and-process-3rd-edition/
Crime,
Criminality
and
Criminal Justice
Third Edition
Rob White
Santina Perrone
Loene Howes
vi Contents
CHAPTER 5: CRIME AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY.................................. 107

Thinking about inequality................................................................................ 108
Community resources, crime and criminality.................................................. 111
Intersections: migration, ethnicity and crime.................................................. 121
Intersections: Indigenous people, colonialism and criminality........................ 126
CHAPTER 6: CRIME AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCE................................. 133

Transforming difference into deviance: ethnic minority groups in
western Sydney.............................................................................................. 134
Social difference and subordinate status: gender-patterned crime................ 138
Social difference and feared status: discourses surrounding disability.......... 143
Status offences and social difference: juvenile crime..................................... 147
Sexuality and social difference....................................................................... 151
CHAPTER 7: CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY........................................ 157

Property as a relationship............................................................................... 158
Social dynamics of property crime................................................................. 161
Vandalism and crimes against property.......................................................... 173
CHAPTER 8: CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON.................................... 181

Street violence and violent crime.................................................................... 182
Heterosexism and homicide........................................................................... 193
CHAPTER 9: CRIMES AGAINST CONVENTION................................... 205

Deviancy and conformity................................................................................ 206
Drugs and alcohol........................................................................................... 210
Public order offences...................................................................................... 218
Animal abuse.................................................................................................. 224
CHAPTER 10: CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL........................................ 231

White-collar and corporate crime................................................................... 232
Class and crimes of the powerful................................................................... 236
Measuring crimes of the powerful................................................................... 238
State crime..................................................................................................... 249
CHAPTER 11: TRANSNATIONAL CRIMES AND GLOBAL

CRIMINOLOGY........................................................................................ 259
Studying transnational crime.......................................................................... 260
State-sponsored violence............................................................................... 265
States in denial............................................................................................... 269
Terrorism........................................................................................................ 271
Human trafficking........................................................................................... 273
Transnational environmental harm and eco-global criminology...................... 275
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

Contents vii
CHAPTER 12: ECO-CRIME AND GREEN CRIMINOLOGY................... 281

What is green criminology?............................................................................ 282
Eco-crime....................................................................................................... 284
Categorising environmental harm................................................................... 288
Environmental victims..................................................................................... 290
Responding to eco-crime............................................................................... 293
CHAPTER 13: CYBERCRIME AND DIGITAL AND

COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES................................................... 298
Cybercrime and cyber-safety......................................................................... 299
Electronic theft................................................................................................ 304
Cyber-bullying................................................................................................ 307
Sexting............................................................................................................ 310
Human rights and cyber-security.................................................................... 313
PART 2: INSTITUTIONS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE................................. 319
CHAPTER 14: POLICE ROLES AND TECHNIQUES.............................. 327

Roles and task orientations............................................................................ 328
Private policing............................................................................................... 332
Police organisational structures and operational strategies........................... 334
CHAPTER 15: DIFFERENT POLICING FOR DIFFERENT PEOPLE...... 350

Differential policing......................................................................................... 351
Over-policing.................................................................................................. 351
Under-policing................................................................................................ 358
Police culture.................................................................................................. 362
Police accountability....................................................................................... 366
CHAPTER 16: FORENSIC STUDIES...................................................... 373

Scoping the field............................................................................................. 375
Application of forensic science to law............................................................ 379
New directions in forensic applications.......................................................... 386
CHAPTER 17: LAW AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION............................ 394

Liberal democracy and the law....................................................................... 395
The concept of law......................................................................................... 396
Legal systems................................................................................................. 397
Making the law................................................................................................ 403
Key players in the legal system....................................................................... 405
CHAPTER 18: COURTS AND COURT PROCESSES............................. 413

The protections of due process...................................................................... 413
The courts....................................................................................................... 416

viii Contents
Interpreting the law......................................................................................... 421

A question of impartiality................................................................................ 422
CHAPTER 19: JUVENILE JUSTICE........................................................ 427

The social context of youth offending............................................................. 428
The context of juvenile justice........................................................................ 430
Juvenile justice systems and responses......................................................... 436
Social justice, criminal justice and justice reinvestment................................. 439
CHAPTER 20: ACCESS AND ALTERNATIVES TO JUSTICE................ 445

Access to justice: critiques............................................................................. 446
Alternative dispute resolution......................................................................... 456
Community legal centres and paralegals........................................................ 460
CHAPTER 21: JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND SENTENCING................... 466

The nature of judicial decision-making........................................................... 467
Methods of determining sentences................................................................ 481
Sentencing penalties...................................................................................... 486
Sentencing debates and reforms.................................................................... 490
CHAPTER 22: PUNISHMENT AND PENALTY....................................... 500

A historical account of punishment................................................................ 501
An interpretive framework............................................................................... 511
CHAPTER 23: INCARCERATION AND PRISONISATION..................... 524

Prisons, prisoners and imprisonment............................................................. 525
Prison objectives and policy contexts............................................................ 532
Dangerousness and violence.......................................................................... 535
Alternatives to use of prisons......................................................................... 546
CHAPTER 24: COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS....................................... 553

Community corrections: the historical context............................................... 554
Community-based sanctions.......................................................................... 555
The rationale for community corrections........................................................ 563
The impact of community corrections............................................................ 567
Prisoner release and post-prison transitions.................................................. 572
Questioning community-based social control................................................. 581
CHAPTER 25: REHABILITATION AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE......... 586

Recidivism and desistance............................................................................. 586
Rehabilitation and reintegration...................................................................... 589
Working with offenders................................................................................... 590
Restorative justice and generativity................................................................ 594

Contents ix
CHAPTER 26: CRIME PREVENTION..................................................... 602

Conceptualising community crime prevention................................................ 603
The notion of ‘community’.............................................................................. 605
Strategies of community crime prevention..................................................... 608
Glossary.......................................................................................................... 629
References...................................................................................................... 639
Index............................................................................................................... 695

x
LIST OF FIGURES
5.1 Prison entrants’ employment/education status in last 30 days, 2015

(numbers).............................................................................................116
5.2 Imprisonment rate, selected country of birth, 2017...............................122
6.1 Dynamics of deviancy...........................................................................136
7.1 Volume and costs of crime, excluding arson, fraud and drugs, 2011
(percentage).........................................................................................163
7.2 Burglary, 2015 (rates per 100,000 people)............................................165
7.3 Short-term and profit-motivated MVT by type of vehicle, 2016–17
(percentage).........................................................................................167
7.4 Property crimes, 2003–13 (rate per 100,000 persons)..........................168
7.5 Other thefts by location, 2013 (percentage)..........................................169
8.1 Violent crimes, 2010–17 (rate per 100,000 persons).............................183
10.1 Typology of corporate criminal conduct................................................235
11.1 Becoming a terrorist.............................................................................273
12.1 Key considerations of environmental harm............................................288
15.1 Police culture........................................................................................363
18.1 The hierarchy of courts in Australia.......................................................417
21.1 Criminal cases finalised in Magistrates Magistrates’ Courts,
2016–17, by method of finalisation.......................................................468
21.2 Criminal cases finalised in higher courts, 2016–17, by method
of finalisation........................................................................................468
21.3 Principal sentence of adult male defendants found guilty
in any court, 2016–17..........................................................................487
21.4 Principal sentence of adult female defendants found guilty
in any court, 2016–17..........................................................................487
21.5 Principal sentence of adult defendants found guilty in Magistrates
Magistrates’ Courts by most serious offence, 2016–17........................489
21.6 Principal sentence of adult defendants found guilty in
higher courts by most serious offence, 2016–17..................................490
23.1 International imprisonment rates, 2008 and 2018.................................527
23.2 Imprisonment rates in Australian states and
territories (per 100,000 adult population), 2017....................................528

xi
23.3 Age-standardised imprisonment rates (per 100,000 adult population)

by Indigenous status, 2007–17............................................................530
23.4 Corrective services expenditure per offender per day, 2016–17,
by jurisdiction.......................................................................................534
24.1 Persons in community-based corrections, 2017 and 2018,
by type of order (number).....................................................................563
24.2 Proportions of custodial and community-based correctional
orders, 2018........................................................................................568
24.3 Persons in community-based corrections, 2015–18,
by type of order (number).....................................................................568
24.4 Persons in prison and community corrections 2006, 2012
and 2018 (number)...............................................................................570
24.5 Community corrections rates by state and territory, 2015–18...............570
24.6 Real net operating expenditure per offender per day
(2016–17 dollars)..................................................................................571
26.1 Routine activities theory........................................................................610
26.2 Crime prevention and car theft.............................................................623
LIST OF TABLES
1.1 Methods of research..............................................................................20

5.1 Crimes of the less powerful..................................................................117
5.2 Crimes of chronic disadvantage...........................................................120
9.1 Offender rate for public order offences 2016–17 by Indigenous
status (selected states and territories)...................................................221
10.1 Crimes of the powerful.........................................................................244
10.2 A complicity continuum of state crime..................................................250
10.3 Crimes by the state..............................................................................251
10.4 Crimes within the state.........................................................................253
11.1 ‘International crimes’............................................................................261
11.2 Studying transnational crime................................................................263
11.3 State-sponsored violence.....................................................................265
11.4 Geographical scale and environmental harm........................................277
12.1 Eco-justice and victims.........................................................................292

xii List of Tables
14.1 Composition of Victoria Police as at 24 June 2017—sworn

and unsworn personnel by rank and gender (full-time equivalent).........335
14.2 Models of policing................................................................................340
14.3 Innovations in policing and their role in crime prevention.......................346
20.1 Formal and informal justice: strengths and weaknesses........................460
21.1 Forms of plea negotiations in Victoria’s courts......................................472
21.2 Jury exemptions and exclusions...........................................................477
21.3 Factors relevant to sentencing..............................................................484
22.1 Objectives and principles of criminal punishment..................................506
23.1 Imprisonment rates in Australia—prisoners per 100,000 adults
by jurisdiction, 2007–17.......................................................................529
23.2 Most serious offence of prisoners sentenced in 2017, by sex...............537
24.1 Community correctional dispositions in Australia..................................556
25.1 Prisoners released who return to prison under sentence within
two years (percentage), 2012–13 to 2016–17......................................587
25.2 Previous imprisonment by current offence and Indigenous status,
30 June 2017.......................................................................................587
25.3 Prisoners released during 2016–17 who returned to corrective
services with a new correctional sanction within two years
(percentage).........................................................................................588
26.1 Approaches and techniques of situational crime prevention..................609

xiii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author and the publisher wish to thank the following copyright holders for
reproduction of their material.
Cover: Stocksy/Rialto Images
Australian Institute of Criminology as © Commonwealth of Australia, p. 479; Copy-
right © State of Victoria, Australia Copyright in all legislation of the Parliament of the
State of Victoria, Australia, is owned by the Crown in right of the State of Victoria,
Australia. Disclaimer: This product or service contains an unofficial version of the
legislation of the Parliament of State of Victoria. The State of Victoria accepts no
responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any legislation contained in this
product or provided through this service, pp. 312–313.
Every effort has been made to trace the original source of copyright material
contained in this book. The publisher will be pleased to hear from copyright holders
to rectify any errors or omissions.

PART 1
CRIME AND CRIMINALITY
Introduction: understanding criminal justice
Crime and victimisation are important issues of concern to the public and Crime
policy-makers alike. Part 1 of this book is about crime and victimisation in Acts that are legally
Australian society. It describes and analyses various kinds of crime-related prohibited by the
harm, most of which are deemed to be ‘criminal’ in the eyes of the law. state and deemed
to be deserving of
In doing so, it traces the general profile, patterns and trends of various punishment and
crimes—from traditional street crimes, such as property crime and crimes control.
against the person, to crimes of the powerful, from white-collar crime and
state crime to transnational crime, including war crimes, environmental crime Harm
and cybercrime—and explores their social dynamics and consequences. An Physical or other
kinds of injury,
important theme of Part 1 is the critical role of social difference in determining distress or damage
who commits which kinds of crime against whom, and how this influences the to humans,
responses of the state and members of society to both the perpetrator and environments and
non-human animals
those impacted by their crimes. resulting from acts
The following chapters commence by considering how categories of state- or omissions that
sanctioned crime and recognition of their corollary, victims, change with the are either legal or
illegal.
passage of time, through the criminalisation and decriminalisation process.
This section recognises and explores the influence of social opinion on the conceptualisation of,
and state response to, crime and deviance. Instrumental to understanding the social construction
of crime is an examination of the media, and their influence on social perceptions of and response
to crime.
A brief overview of criminological theories or explanations of crime, and an examination of the
main categories of crime, follows. The emphasis in this part of the book is on tracing the social
construction of crime, the prevalence of various types of criminal or antisocial behaviour, the profile
of those who engage in this behaviour and the contours of social harm associated with these acts.
The historical evolution of theorising about and responding to victims of crime is also explored, with
an emphasis on underscoring the process of social construction of victimhood.
The question of how we define crime, and how we define the perpetrators and victims of crime,
is inextricably bound up with social processes. Crime and victimisation are not socially neutral
concepts, nor is society’s conceptualisation and response to these phenomena static. For example,
men are more likely than women to engage in violent crimes; working-class people are more

likely than middle-class people to be prosecuted for offending behaviour, especially in regard to
street offences, with the notable exception of sexual assault; and sexual assault is overwhelmingly
perpetrated by men against women, who are disproportionately the victims of such crime. In other
words, social divisions—based upon aspects of identity such as class, gender, ethnicity, Indigenous
status, age, disability and religion—have major influences on who does what to whom and why,
as well as how the criminal justice system responds. Inequalities and social differences, and the
intersection between these aspects of identity, must be taken into account if we are to understand
fully the social nature of crime and its control in Australian society (Bartels 2012a).
Defining crime
‘Crime’ is not a straightforward concept. There are in fact many diverse conceptions of crime,
each reflecting a different scientific and ideological viewpoint. Hagan (1987), for example, identifies
seven different approaches to the definition of crime, ranging from a ‘legal-consensus’ definition to
a ‘human rights’ definition. For present purposes, we can summarise broad differences in definition
as follows:
• Formal legal definition: crime is a prohibited activity defined as such by the state; that is, if an
act is proscribed by the criminal law, and is subject to state sanction in the form of a specific
penalty, then it is a crime.
• Social harm conception: crime encompasses both criminal offences (e.g. assault) and civil
offences (e.g. negligence), given that each type of action or inaction brings with it some type of
harm. According to this perspective, all acts resulting in harm should attract some sort of penalty.
• Cross-cultural universal norms perspective: crime is universally understood; in essence, it
does not vary across cultures. Thus, murder is murder regardless of the society in which it
is committed, and we can therefore postulate conduct norms that cut across diverse cultural
backgrounds.
• Labelling approach: crime only exists when there has been a social response to a particular
activity that labels that activity as criminal. If there is no label, there is, in effect, no crime.
• Human rights approach: crime occurs whenever a human right has been violated, regardless
of the legality or otherwise of the action. Such a conception expands the definition of crime to
include oppressive practices such as racism, sexism and class-based exploitation.
• Human diversity approach: deviance represents a normal response to oppressive or unequal
circumstances. A major focus here is on power relations, and the attempts by dominant groups
to restrict human diversity of experience, language and culture (e.g. the interventions of the
British Empire in reordering Indigenous peoples’ ways of life).
From a strictly legal perspective, the answer to ‘what is crime?’ is an unproblematic given; it is
simply what the law says it is (see White, Haines & Asquith 2017). In this view, the state has a central
place in marking out the boundaries of right and wrong by defining what is criminal and what is not. For
an act to be criminal, it must be legally prohibited by the state and sanctions must apply. A failure to act,
where the law imposes a duty to do so (referred to as an omission), is also illegal and punishable by law.
According to this perspective, the state thus has the ultimate power to shape the reality of crime and
how society responds to that reality. When it comes to how most criminal justice institutions operate,

the formal legal definition of crime is the primary consideration, even though the above-mentioned
perspectives on crime might also shape official reactions to behaviour that could be seen as harmful
but not legally criminal. One of the key limitations of a formal legal definition of crime, however, is that
it provides a narrow conception of harm. Furthermore, it often disregards the issue of state-sponsored
actions that may themselves be sources of considerable harm, but which are not criminalised by that
self-same state (Maier-Katkin et al. 2009; see also Chapters 10, 11 and 12).
Most sociologists and criminologists adopt a much wider definition of crime that encompasses
notions of ‘harm’ and ‘deviance’, which are not necessarily acknowledged as criminal by the state.
For some theorists, the key emphasis is on a human rights approach to harm, which introduces the
concept of universal rights—inalienable rights that all governments should guarantee to all persons,
given that a failure to do so negatively impacts human prospects and wellbeing—and the equitable
distribution of such rights. Universal rights may include security rights (the prevention of basic physical
and psychological harms from genocide, torture, murder, rape etc.), as well as economic rights (the
right to private property), political rights (the right to vote public officials into office) and autonomy rights
(freedom of speech, assembly and press) (see e.g. Loader & Sparks 2010; Murphy & Whitty 2013;
Schwendinger & Schwendinger 1975; Talbott 2010, 2005). In many cases, harmful actions, such as
price fixing, tax evasion or preventable workplace ‘accidents’, are ignored or downplayed by agencies
of criminal justice, even though they cause great social harm, including death (see Chapters 10 and 20).
For others, the emphasis is less on defining certain acts as bad or good than on examining the social
processes by which an act comes to be seen as a crime. According to this perspective, the law is not
an external, objective truth that is applied consistently; the concern is therefore to explore the group
interactions and institutional procedures that make certain people and certain actions more liable to be
labelled criminal than others (see e.g. Muncie 1996; Rubington & Weinberg 1978).
From a historical and cross-cultural perspective, we find that legal definitions of crime are
transitory and relative. ‘Crime’ varies greatly depending upon the historical period, and the social
and cultural context within which it operates. In medieval Europe, for example, when the Christian
Church was the arbiter of what was deemed to be right and wrong, key crimes included heresy (i.e.
going against Church doctrine and beliefs) and usury (charging interest on money lent to another
person). With the advent of secular systems of law, crime began to be defined less in religious
terms and more in respect to property rights (e.g. theft) and acts against the state (e.g. treason)
(see Chapter 22). Comparative analysis shows us that what is considered a crime in some countries
is not regarded criminal in others and that, within any given country, an act may be defined into
(criminalised) or out of existence (decriminalised) over time. This national and temporal variability in
legislated crime includes the following examples (Asal et al. 2012; Bibby & Harrison 2014; Duncan
2017; Edwards 2017; Grenfell & Hewitt 2012; Nossiter 2014; O’Malley 2013a; Powell 2010; Rankin
2011; SBS World News 2017; Singh et al. 2018; The Age 2013a; The Guardian 2018; Titterington
et al. 2013; Winsor 2017; World Health Organization 2018):
• Bigamy is considered illegal in Australia, whereas in many Muslim-majority countries,
polygamous relations, whereby men are permitted to have up to four wives at the same time,
are legalised.
• While permissible in Australia, approximately 11 countries, including France, the Netherlands,
Belgium and Chad, have banned or partially banned the wearing of traditional Islamic dress in
public, specifically the burqa and the niqab, which cover all or most of the face.

• Euthanasia—the right to die, either by physician-assisted suicide, active euthanasia (a
doctor administering a lethal injection) or peaceful deliverance (suicide via self-administered
intervention)—is permitted in some form in Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, and
Canada among other countries. While the subject of longstanding debate and proposed law
reform across Australia, Victoria is the only jurisdiction to have legalised physician-assisted
dying for the terminally ill (effective from mid-2019).
• The physical punishment of children (including but not restricted to smacking, slapping or
spanking with a hand or implement) is prohibited in 53 countries, including Sweden, Germany,
New Zealand, South Sudan and Venezuela, but is generally considered legal in Australia, the
United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, with some restrictions.
• The use of drugs, such as alcohol or cannabis, is subject to widely varying rules and sanctions
across countries. For example, after years of prohibition across the United States, nine states
and Washington DC have recently legislated to legalise marijuana for adult use, and over 30
other states have approved the use of marijuana for medical purposes. New Zealand has
legalised all psychoactive substances (e.g. synthetic cannabis) containing ingredients that
meet safety standards.
• Female genital mutilation (the surgical cutting of the genitalia to ensure virtue by controlling
sexual desire), which is illegal in Australia, is considered a traditional rite of passage into
womanhood in regions of western, eastern and north-eastern Africa, some parts of the Middle
East and Asia, and among some groups of migrants from these regions.
• Same-sex marriage has been legalised in only 25 countries around the world, including the
Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, the United States, the United Kingdom, New Zealand,
Canada, Iceland and, since December 2017, Australia.
• Homosexuality, decriminalised in Australia and other Western countries some years ago,
remains illegal in approximately 72 countries, primarily located in Africa and the Middle East,
attracting severe penalties such as life imprisonment (e.g. Uganda) and corporal and capital
punishment (e.g. Iran and Saudi Arabia).
• Transgender status has recently been recognised by the High Court of Australia, paving the
way for representations of ‘sex’ to move beyond the normative gender binary of male and
female currently reflected in the law and legal documents. However, many states and territories
impose requirements for gender recognition that have been criticised by the Australian Human
Rights Commission, including undergoing psychiatric diagnosis or certification by a medical
professional, and sexual reassignment surgery.
• Abortion laws have been liberalised to varying degrees in Australia from 1998 and in many other
countries. However, abortion remains totally illegal in 26 countries (e.g. Malta, Egypt, Iraq and
Tonga) and available but restricted in many more (e.g. Italy, Brazil, Mexico, New Zealand and
Indonesia).
• Laws have been introduced in Australia to criminalise violations of privacy in public by use of
emerging information and communication technologies (e.g. ‘upskirting’ and ‘downblousing’)
and the unauthorised distribution of sexual imagery (e.g. sexting and image-based abuse,
including the non-consensual sharing of intimate images or the threat of doing so).

• Internationally, disputes and negotiations continue over how to define war crimes, terrorism
and environmental crimes, and the acceptability of practices such as state-sanctioned torture
(see Chapters 11 and 12).
• Conflicts between states may stem, in part, from disagreements over what is considered a
crime (e.g. bulldozing residential buildings in an occupied territory, such as Gaza) or simply
national security (e.g. the military occupation of Iraq as a forward defence against terrorist
attacks on Coalition allies).
We could also consider the question ‘what is crime?’ from the perspective of media portrayals
(see Chapter 2). The popular image of crime is unquestionably that of street crime, involving
assaults, murder, theft and sexual assault, largely committed by strangers. These images are
bolstered by advertising that explicitly uses the fear of crime as a means to sell security devices
and promote private policing as the answer to the presumed problem. Media emphasis tends to be
on certain types of predatory crime, and such crime tends to be sensationalised. Moreover, much
emphasis is given to the distinctiveness of criminals (e.g. features such as skin or hair colour), and
the appropriateness of victim behaviour (e.g. how they were dressed or how much alcohol they had
consumed); hence, criminality and victimhood are frequently based on stereotype and caricature
(see Chapter 4). In the main, complex crimes and crimes of the powerful tend not to be dealt with
in either mainstream or fictional accounts of crime (see Chapter 10).
Finally, if we ask the question ‘what is crime?’ from a commonsense and everyday perspective,
we might find that it operates as a loose notion based upon morality. Most people break the law
at some stage in their lives, but common crimes (e.g. the use of ‘soft’ illegal drugs) do not always
translate into the offenders being perceived or responded to as criminals by members of society
at large. Crime is frowned upon, but certain types of crime are nevertheless more likely to be
regarded as socially acceptable, despite such behaviours being legally proscribed (e.g. perceived
or victimless crimes such as speeding, fare evasion, vagrancy and prostitution). Of course, there are
no universal moral truths; perceptions of moral appropriateness reflect the sociological composition
and values of any given society at any point in time. Furthermore, morality and the law are not
always congruent. Some actions considered lawful (e.g. the sale and distribution of non-violent
and non-child-related pornography, prostitution, abortion, voluntary assisted dying and same-sex
marriage) may be wholly or partially legal, but still be considered immoral, especially by those
with strong religious beliefs (see e.g. Medew 2016a on the issue of conscientious objection to
performing surgical abortions by some medical practitioners). It is for this reason that law and, by
extension, the definition of crime, is seen by some as less of an expression of morality and more of
an expression of power (Cotterrell 1992). It is ultimately the state that assigns a criminal status to
individuals, regardless of general public opinion or sentiment. The second part of this book explores
how, over time, public opinion and shifting conceptions on morality can influence changes in the
criminal law and thus a shift in what is considered a criminal, health or moral problem.
Crime and criminal law

The criminal law identifies those behaviours deemed by lawmakers to be deserving of punishment
and control. Which acts are considered wrongful reflects a historical process; over time, various
acts are prohibited (or, conversely, legalised) into the future because of the legal precedents set by

the past. This can make law reform slow and difficult, as demonstrated by the prolonged processes
of recasting the concept of spousal conjugal rights to intercourse as a criminal offence in the case
of spousal rape (Larcombe & Heath 2012). Under the law of coverture, women were seen to be
fused into the legal identity of men upon marriage. In such a (fictional) legal unity, there could be no
concept of rape and, furthermore, it was assumed that women granted consent to sexual relations
upon entering the marriage contract. It took a concerted struggle before harm within the marriage
contract was socially and legally acknowledged. It was not until 1993 that the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights published the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against
Women (1993), which established marital rape as a human rights violation. To this day, some United
Nations member states only criminalise rape in marriage where the individuals are legally separated,
and non-member states vary widely in their conceptualisation of non-consensual marital intercourse
(Equality Now 2017).
Which acts are considered harmful is also a political process, in which the contemporary tenor
of law-and-order politics sets the parameters and tone of legislation relating to crime and crime
control (see further Chapters 21 and 22). To put it differently, criminal laws are a human product,
but cannot be reduced to human behaviour. They are social constructions forged in historical
and social circumstances that put their unique stamp upon what and who is considered to be
harmful enough to be criminalised at any point in time (Matthews 2009). Clearly, not all harmful acts
(interpersonal or social) are criminalised. This alone makes it clear that decisions about the criminal
law are contested rather than immutable. The overall aim of criminal law is to prevent certain kinds
of behaviour regarded as harmful or potentially harmful, and to do so through a rational system of
adjudication and punishment. The challenge for lawmakers is to choose which harms to criminalise
and which to deal with through other types of social regulation (e.g. civil proceedings).
The key purposes of criminal law are encapsulated in three broad objectives (Findlay et al. 2005):
1 Moral wrongness: the criminal law is a vital instrument in deterring immoral behaviour.
2 Individual autonomy: the criminal law should only be used against behaviour that injures the
rights and interests of other people (the ‘harms to others’ approach).
3 Community welfare: the principal purpose of criminal law is to protect the physical wellbeing of
members of a community.
Importantly, the different reasons or purposes of criminal law are frequently in conflict with
each other, and these contradictory rationales, in turn, reflect specific ideological or philosophical
differences. For instance, conservative versions of New Right thinking about law and order see the
upholding of certain moral standards as a crucial aspect of criminal law. Libertarian perspectives
within the broad New Right framework, however, see such legislation as an encroachment upon
individual rights and liberties. While the first perspective favours criminalisation of activity deemed
to be immoral, the second seeks to keep out of the criminal court those activities freely chosen by
individuals, which appear to do no real harm to others around them (White, Haines & Asquith 2017).
The act and the intent

In most cases, according to criminal law, two elements must be present to constitute a crime—the
act and the intent:
All crimes comprise some form of prohibited conduct which may be an act or (in
rare cases) an omission. This conduct element denotes the external or physical

component of a crime. Another element found in many (but not all) crimes is the
mental state of the person at the time when the prohibited conduct was performed.
This may take several forms such as intention, recklessness or knowledge in relation
to the prohibited conduct … However, there are many crimes, known as offences of
strict liability and of absolute liability, which do not require any such awareness at all.
(Findlay et al. 2005: 20)
The conduct element of a crime refers to the accused’s action (actus Actus reus
reus); that is, ‘guilty act’. This refers to the physical aspect of committing a A Latin term
meaning ‘guilty
crime. The prohibited conduct must have been performed voluntarily (e.g. not
act’. An element
while under duress, or while sleepwalking). The mental element of a crime of criminal
refers to a determination that the accused’s conduct was accompanied by responsibility
a prescribed state of mind (mens rea); that is, ‘guilty mind’. This reflects the comprising
the physical
idea that people ought to be judged by their free and conscious choice of components of a
action. crime. These may
In some instances, the law will ignore the subjective approach (which be wrongful acts,
omissions or a
focuses on the mental element) in favour of arguments based on community
state of affairs that
welfare or public interest (particularly if future crime is to be prevented constitute a violation
or reduced). This is particularly the case, for example, in regard to of the law.
environmental law.
The issue of legal personhood is wrapped around the notion that all adults Mens rea
have the necessary mental capacity to make judgments and take responsibility A Latin term
meaning ‘guilty
for their actions. Exceptions to this mental responsibility element of crime
mind’. An element
have to be proven in court, as in the case of those who can show that they of criminal
were insane (within certain defined legal prescriptions) at the time when the responsibility
comprising the
prohibited behaviour took place—this is known as the M’Naghten Rules (see
mental components
Finnane 2012 for a review of its historical application in Australia). The age of of a crime. The
criminal responsibility in Australia across all states and territories is 10—an focus is on criminal
age below which a child is deemed by law to be incapable of committing a intent; that is, a
person’s awareness
criminal offence. Furthermore, between the ages of 10 and 14, children are that their actions
presumed incapable of wrongdoing under legislation or common law (this is were wilful and
known as the legal doctrine of doli incapax), and this presumption must be wrongful.
rebutted before criminal proceedings can be brought against them (i.e. the
prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the child knew that
the act was wrong ‘as distinct from an act of mere naughtiness or childish mischief’ (Lord Lowry in
C (A minor) in v DPP [1955] 2WLR 383; see also Richards 2011; Schetzer 2000; Urbas 2000).
The issue of criminal responsibility can, however, be problematic. This is especially true in
relation to corporations, where the concept of mens rea is difficult to apply. Notwithstanding these
difficulties, the concept of corporate criminal responsibility has been successfully established, to
varying degrees, in many jurisdictions, including Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States
and Canada (see e.g. Alvesalo-Kuusi et al. 2018; Perrone 2000; Taylor & Mackenzie 2013; Woodley
2013), albeit to limited practical effect in the specific area of criminal law.

The criminalisation process
Assessment of the conduct and mental elements of crime provides some inkling of the social
dynamics that underpin criminality. What is deemed to be criminal and who is defined as an offender
involve a social process in which officials of the state formally intervene and designate certain acts
and certain actors as warranting a criminal label. Until an act, or actor, has been processed in
particular ways by the state, there is no ‘crime’ as such. This is regardless of the actual behaviour
that takes place. In other words, crime does not ‘exist’ until there has been an official reaction to
the event.
To become a criminal is to be labelled so by the criminal justice system. To understand this, we
have to shift the focus away from the discussion of varying definitions of crime (including arguments
regarding different types of social harm and whether to criminalise these), to an analysis of the
ways in which something or someone becomes institutionally recognised as being criminal. In this
account, the emphasis is on the factors that determine the social status of an event or person.
What is important, for present purposes, is that how criminal justice officials (especially the
police) intervene in any given situation has a direct impact on whether any particular event, or any
particular individual, will be officially criminalised. The criminalisation process is contingent upon
how discretion is used throughout the criminal justice system. Our attention is thus drawn to the
role of criminal justice institutions in constructing crime, rather than to the actual act or conduct
itself.
To illustrate this point, it is useful to consider how the process of becoming a young offender
involves a number of steps and pathways into, or diversions from, the criminal justice system, such
as (ABS 2014a):
• A young person enters into the criminal justice system as a result of someone reporting an
event to the authorities, or the police observing a young person in the act of doing something
illegal or antisocial.
• The police officer intervenes and an investigation is undertaken, involving questioning of the
young person. A crime may be deemed to have been committed but, in the case of a minor
offence, the investigating officer may exercise their discretion, simply deciding to move the
young offender along with or without issuing an unofficial caution.
• Depending on the nature of the behaviour observed or reported, and the attitude and cooperation
demonstrated by the young person, the police officer may decide to proceed further against the
alleged offender. The young person is taken to the police station, and the crime and victim(s)
(if applicable and identifiable) are recorded by police. At this stage, the officer may decide to
pursue non-court action against the young person. Where this involves a formal caution, the
young person’s parent(s)/legal guardian(s) or, where unavailable, an independent third person,
are called into the station for a tripartite discussion about the incident (police, young person
and their parent(s)/guardian(s) or independent representative).
• Alternatively, the young person may be diverted from court by police via the option of participation
in a family conference (or equivalent) or formal pre-court diversion program. Based on restorative
justice principles, these programs are designed to ensure that offenders accept responsibility for
the harms caused by their actions by requiring them to meet with any victims, as well as others
affected by the offence, and agree some form of reparation for the harm caused.

• If the incident is more serious, the police officer may decide to formally proceed against the
young person via court action. Once formally charged with an offence, the young person will
generally be issued with a summons, which outlines the date they are required to attend court
and the reasons why.
• If the incident or alleged offence is very serious, then the young person may be required to
apply for bail. This enables the defendant to remain out of custody awaiting trial, on the basis
of a monetary guarantee and/or pledge to present before the court at the required time.
• In some instances, the option of bail will not be offered or an application for bail may be
declined, and the young person will be placed in detention on remand (i.e. in secure custody
awaiting trial).
• If the young person’s case proceeds to court (usually a children’s court, which has special rules
and procedures to take into account the special needs and circumstances of children), their
guilt or innocence is legally determined.
• If the young person is found guilty of an offence, the judge or magistrate can impose a variety
of sanctions (alternative penalties or dispositions), which range from simply issuing a warning
to imposing a fine or placing the young person on some kind of community-based behavioural
order (which restricts their activity, or demands that they attend special training or drug and
alcohol sessions), through to incarcerating a young person in a youth detention centre.
This story of a young person’s progress through the criminal justice system varies greatly in
practice, depending upon a wide range of factors, including:
• whether the incident was deemed a crime
• the visibility of the crime
• the presence of victims and the nature and extent of the harm occasioned
• whether the incident was detected by the police themselves or someone reported it to the police
• if the incident was reported to police, who reported it, and whether they were taken seriously
by the police
• the police resources available to deal the particular kind of crime
• the nature and strength of the evidence available to police
• the characteristics, attitude and behaviour of the young person
• whether and how well the young person, and/or their family and friends are known to police
• the statutory options available for processing the young person in the particular jurisdiction,
such as police cautioning schemes or juvenile conferencing options
• the influence of official reports by social workers and other professionals on how best to deal
with the young person
• how well the young person presents in the police station
• the attitude of the magistrate or judge in relation to the offence at issue and the appearance and
demeanour of the young person in court
• the quality of legal representation
• whether the young person has a previous criminal record.

Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
sa femme leur donnèrent du pain de seigle et du lait, et beaucoup de
remerciements, et le Taureau trouva l’occasion de dire :
— Vous m’avez aidé à faire un bon demi-champ de plus que je
n’aurais fait autrement. Mais le plus dur de la journée est encore à
venir, frère.
Leo désira s’étendre à terre et méditer sur les paroles du Crabe.
Virgo s’en alla causer avec la femme et le bébé du cultivateur, et le
labourage d’après-midi commença.
— Aide-nous maintenant, dit le Taureau. Les énergies du jour
baissent. J’ai les jambes toutes roides. Chante comme tu n’as
jamais chanté.
— Pour un villageois boueux ? dit Leo.
— Il est sous le même signe que nous. Es-tu donc lâche ? dit le
Taureau.
Leo rougit et recommença, la gorge irritée, et de mauvaise
humeur. Peu à peu il dévia du Chant des Enfants, et sans
désemparer composa un chant ; et c’était là chose qu’il n’aurait
jamais faite s’il n’eût rencontré le Crabe face à face. Il se souvint de
détails concernant les cultivateurs et les bœufs et les rizières, qu’il
n’avait pas spécialement remarqués avant l’entrevue, et les relia
ensemble, s’y intéressant davantage à mesure qu’il chantait, et il en
conta au cultivateur au sujet de son travail et sur lui-même,
beaucoup plus que n’en savait le cultivateur. Le Taureau l’approuvait
par ses grognements, tout en peinant dans les sillons pour la
dernière fois de ce jour-là, et le chant se termina, laissant le
cultivateur avec une très bonne opinion de lui-même en dépit de ses
os douloureux. Virgo sortit de la cabane où elle avait tenu tranquilles
les enfants et conté à l’épouse des propos de femme, et ils
mangèrent tous ensemble le repas du soir.
— Vous devez avoir là une existence bien agréable, dit le
cultivateur, à rester assis comme ça sur une digue tout le jour et à
chanter ce qui vous passe par la tête. Dites, vous deux, y a-t-il
longtemps que vous menez cette vie… de bohémiens ?
— Oh ! beugla le Taureau, de sa litière. Voilà tous les
remerciements que tu recevras jamais des hommes, frère.
— Non, répondit Virgo au paysan. Nous venons seulement de
commencer ; mais nous allons nous y tenir aussi longtemps que
nous vivrons. N’est-ce pas, Leo ?
— Oui, dit celui-ci.
Et ils s’éloignèrent, la main dans la main.
— Tu chantes admirablement, Leo, dit celle-ci comme une
femme doit le dire à son mari.
— Et toi, qu’as-tu fait ? demanda-t-il.
— J’ai causé avec la mère et les petits. Tu ne croirais jamais
comme il nous faut peu de chose pour nous faire rire, nous autres
femmes.
— Et… suis-je destiné à poursuivre ce… ce métier de
bohémien ? dit Leo.
— Oui, mon aimé, et je t’y aiderai.
Il n’y a pas de documents écrits sur la vie de Leo et de Virgo, et
nous ne pouvons dire comment Leo s’accommoda de son nouvel
emploi qu’il détestait. Mais nous sommes assurés que Virgo l’aimait
davantage à chaque fois qu’il chantait ; voire même quand, la
chanson finie, elle faisait le tour de la société avec une sorte de
tambour de basque, et recueillait les sous de leur pain quotidien. Il y
avait aussi des fois où incombait à Leo la tâche très ardue de
consoler Virgo, indignée par les odieux éloges que les gens leur
donnaient à tous deux… ou par les ridicules plumes onduleuses de
faisan qu’on piquait au bonnet de Leo, ou par les boutons et les
morceaux de drap que l’on cousait à son habit. En vraie femme, elle
savait le conseiller et l’aider en vue de leur but, mais la bassesse
des moyens la révoltait.
— Qu’importe, disait Leo, aussi longtemps que mes chants les
rendent un peu plus heureux ?
Et ils poursuivaient leur route et recommençaient des variations
sur le très vieux thème : que de tout ce qui leur arrivait ou ne leur
arrivait pas, les enfants des hommes ne devaient pas s’en effrayer.
Ce fut un enseignement pénible au début, mais au cours des ans
Leo s’aperçut qu’il savait l’art de faire rire les hommes et de les tenir
attentifs autour de lui, même quand la pluie tombait. Mais tandis que
la foule hurlait de plaisir, il y avait des gens qui s’asseyaient à terre
et pleuraient doucement, et ces gens-là prétendaient que c’était
l’œuvre de Leo ; et Virgo leur parlait dans les intervalles de la
représentation et faisait de son mieux pour les réconforter. Des gens
mouraient aussi, tandis que Leo contait, ou chantait, ou riait, car le
Sagittaire et le Scorpion et le Crabe et les autres Maisons étaient
sans cesse à l’œuvre. Parfois la foule se dispersait, prise de
panique, et Leo s’efforçait de les tranquilliser en leur déclarant que
c’était là une lâcheté, et parfois les gens se moquaient des Maisons
qui les tuaient, et Leo leur expliquait que c’était là une lâcheté pire
encore que de s’enfuir.
Dans leurs vagabondages ils rencontraient le Taureau ou le
Bélier ou les Gémeaux, mais tous étaient trop occupés et se
bornaient à s’adresser un signe de tête réciproque par-dessus la
foule, sans interrompre leur besogne. Avec les années ils cessèrent
même de se reconnaître, car les Enfants du Zodiaque avaient oublié
qu’ils eussent jamais été des dieux travaillant pour l’amour des
hommes. Sur le front du Taureau, Aldébaran était ternie de boue
séchée, la toison du Bélier était poudreuse et déchirée, et les
Gémeaux n’étaient plus que des petits enfants se battant autour du
chat sur un seuil. Ce fut alors que Leo dit :
— Cessons de chanter et de faire les baladins.
Et ce fut alors que Virgo lui répondit :
— Non.
Mais elle ignorait pourquoi elle proférait ce « non » aussi
énergiquement.
Leo soutint que c’était là de la perversité, jusqu’au jour où elle-
même à la fin d’une étape rebutante lui fit la même proposition. Il lui
répondit : « Bien assurément pas », et oubliant le sens des étoiles
situées au-dessus d’eux, ils se querellèrent déplorablement. Au
cours des ans, d’autres chanteurs et d’autres discours surgirent, et
Leo, oubliant qu’il ne saurait jamais y en avoir trop, les détestait
parce qu’ils accaparaient les applaudissements des enfants des
hommes, qu’il estimait devoir être uniquement pour lui. Virgo se
fâchait, elle aussi, et alors les chants s’interrompaient et les
plaisanteries s’affadissaient durant des semaines, et les enfants des
hommes criaient :
— Allez-vous-en chez vous, les deux bohémiens. Allez-vous-en
et apprenez à chanter quelque chose qui en vaille la peine.
Après l’un de ces tristes jours de honte, Virgo, qui marchait au
côté de Leo, vit la pleine lune se lever par-dessus les arbres, et elle
saisit le bras de Leo en s’écriant :
— Voici que le temps est révolu. Oh ! Leo, pardonne-moi !
— Qu’y a-t-il ? dit Leo, qui pensait aux autres chanteurs.
— Oh ! mon mari ! répliqua-t-elle.
Et elle porta la main à son sein, et le sein qu’il connaissait si bien
était dur comme pierre. Leo soupira, et se rappelant les paroles du
Crabe, il s’écria :
— A coup sûr nous étions autrefois des dieux.
— A coup sûr nous sommes toujours des dieux, reprit Virgo. Ne
te rappelles-tu pas que toi et moi nous sommes allés à la Maison du
Crabe et… que nous n’étions pas trop effrayés ? Et depuis lors…
nous avons oublié dans quel but nous chantions… Nous chantions
pour des sous, et, hélas ! nous avons lutté pour des sous !… Nous
qui sommes les Enfants du Zodiaque !
— C’était ma faute, dit Leo.
— Comment peut-il y avoir de ta faute qui ne soit aussi la
mienne ? dit Virgo. Mon temps est révolu, mais tu vivras encore
longtemps, et…
Son regard exprima tout ce qu’elle ne put proférer.
— Oui, je me souviendrai que nous sommes des dieux, dit Leo.
Il est très dur, même pour un Enfant du Zodiaque qui a oublié sa
divinité, de voir sa femme se mourir lentement et de savoir qu’il ne
peut lui venir en aide. Dans ces derniers mois, Virgo raconta à Leo
tout ce qu’elle avait dit et fait parmi les femmes et les petits enfants
en dehors des représentations nomades, et Leo s’étonna de l’avoir
si peu connue, elle qui était tout pour lui. Quand elle fut à la mort elle
l’adjura de ne jamais plus lutter pour des sous ni se quereller avec
d’autres chanteurs, et surtout de se remettre à chanter dès qu’elle
serait morte.
Elle mourut, et après l’avoir enterrée, il fit route jusqu’à un village
de sa connaissance, où les gens espéraient le voir se disputer avec
un nouveau chanteur qui s’était produit durant son absence. Mais
Leo l’appela « Mon frère ». Le nouveau chanteur était marié depuis
peu — Leo le savait — et quand il eut fini de chanter, Leo se dressa
et chanta le chant de Virgo qu’il avait composé chemin faisant. Tous
ceux qui étaient mariés ou en espoir de l’être, de quelque condition
ou race qu’ils fussent, comprirent cette chanson… jusqu’à la jeune
femme appuyée au bras de son nouvel époux. Quand Leo cessa de
chanter et qu’il sentit son cœur prêt à se briser, les hommes
sanglotaient.
— Voilà une histoire triste, dirent-ils enfin ; à présent fais-nous
rire.
Parce que Leo avait connu tout le chagrin qu’un homme peut
endurer, y inclus la pleine conscience de sa propre chute quand on a
été jadis un dieu… il changea aussitôt de gamme, et fit rire les gens,
si fort qu’ils n’en pouvaient plus. Ils s’en allèrent, disposés à affronter
tous les maux imaginables, et ils donnèrent à Leo plus de plumes de
faisan et de sous qu’il n’en pouvait compter. Sachant que les sous
entraînent aux disputes et que les plumes de faisan étaient odieuses
à Virgo, il les rejeta loin de lui et se mit en quête de ses frères, pour
leur rappeler qu’ils étaient des dieux.
Il trouva le Taureau ensanglantant les buissons d’un fossé, car le
Scorpion l’avait piqué, et il se mourait, non pas lentement comme
Virgo, mais promptement.
— Je sais tout, gémit le Taureau à la vue de Leo. J’avais oublié
aussi, mais voilà que je me rappelle. Va voir les champs que j’ai
labourés : les sillons sont droits. J’avais oublié que j’étais un dieu,
mais malgré cela j’ai tiré la charrue bien droit. Et toi, frère ?
— Je ne suis pas au bout de mon labourage, dit Leo. Est-ce que
la mort fait mal ?
— Non, pas la mort, mais de mourir, dit le Taureau.
Et il expira.
Le cultivateur qui le possédait alors fut très marri, car il lui restait
encore un champ à labourer.
Ce fut après cela que Leo composa le chant du Taureau qui avait
été un dieu et ne s’en souvenait plus, et il le chanta de telle sorte
que la moitié des jeunes hommes du monde s’imaginèrent qu’eux
aussi étaient peut-être bien des dieux sans le savoir. Une moitié de
cette moitié en conçurent une vanité insupportable et moururent de
bonne heure. Une moitié du reste s’efforcèrent d’être des dieux sans
y parvenir, mais l’autre moitié accomplirent quatre fois plus de
besogne qu’ils n’auraient fait sous l’influence de toute autre illusion.
Plus tard, des années plus tard, toujours errant par monts et par
vaux et faisant rire les enfants des hommes, il trouva les Gémeaux
assis sur la berge d’un torrent, à attendre la venue des Poissons qui
les emporteraient. Ils n’étaient pas le moins du monde effrayés, et ils
dirent à Leo que la femme de la maison avait un vrai bébé à elle, et
que quand le bébé serait assez grand pour devenir méchant, il
trouverait un chat bien éduqué, tout prêt à se laisser tirer la queue.
Alors les Poissons vinrent les chercher, mais tout ce que virent les
gens, ce fut deux enfants noyés dans un torrent, et bien que leur
mère adoptive en fût très triste, elle serra son vrai bébé sur son sein
et se réjouit de n’avoir perdu que les enfants trouvés.
Alors Leo composa le chant des Gémeaux qui avaient oublié
qu’ils étaient des dieux et qui avaient joué dans la poussière pour
amuser leur mère adoptive. Ce chant fut chanté partout parmi les
femmes. Il les faisait tout à la fois rire et pleurer et serrer leurs petits
plus étroitement sur leurs cœurs ; et plusieurs des femmes qui se
souvenaient de Virgo dirent :
— A coup sûr c’est la voix de Virgo. Elle seule pouvait en savoir
autant sur nous.
Après avoir composé ces trois chants, Leo les rechanta sans
cesse jusqu’à ce qu’il fût en danger de ne plus voir en eux qu’autant
de mots vides, et les gens qui l’écoutaient s’en fatiguaient, et Leo fut
repris de la vieille tentation de cesser de chanter une fois pour
toutes. Mais il se rappela les paroles de Virgo mourante, et
persévéra.
Tandis qu’il chantait, l’un de ses auditeurs l’interrompit :
— Leo, dit-il, voilà quarante ans que je t’entends nous raconter
de ne pas avoir peur. Ne peux-tu enfin nous chanter quelque chose
de nouveau ?
— Non, dit Leo, c’est le seul chant que je sois autorisé à chanter.
Vous ne devez pas avoir peur des Maisons, même quand elles vous
tuent.
De lassitude, l’homme allait s’éloigner, mais un sifflement déchira
l’air, et l’on vit la flèche du Sagittaire raser le sol, dardée vers le
cœur de l’homme. Il se redressa, et resta paisiblement à attendre
que la flèche eût atteint son but.
— Je meurs, dit-il avec calme. Il est bon pour moi, Leo, que tu
aies chanté pendant quarante ans.
— As-tu peur ? dit Leo penché sur lui.
— Je suis un homme, et non un dieu, dit l’homme. Sans tes
chants je me serais enfui. Ma tâche est faite, et je meurs sans
montrer ma peur.
« Me voici fort bien récompensé, se dit Leo en lui-même. A
présent que j’ai vu ce que produisent mes chants, je vais en chanter
de meilleurs. »
Il chemina sur la route, rassembla sa petite foule d’auditeurs, et
entama le chant de Virgo. Tout en chantant, il sentit sur la pomme de
sa gorge le contact glacé de la patte du Crabe. Il leva la main, et se
tut un instant, étouffé.
— Chante, Leo, dit la foule. Ta vieille chanson coule toujours
aussi bien qu’autrefois.
Le cœur étreint par la crainte glacée, Leo poursuivit résolument
jusqu’au bout. Son chant terminé, il sentit l’étreinte se resserrer sur
sa gorge. Il était vieux, il avait perdu Virgo, il se savait en train de
perdre plus de la moitié de son aptitude à chanter, il pouvait à peine
se traîner jusqu’aux foules décroissantes qui l’attendaient, et il ne
distinguait plus les figures qui l’entouraient. Néanmoins il cria
coléreusement au Crabe :
— Pourquoi viens-tu déjà me prendre ?
— Tu es né sous mon signe. Comment pourrais-je me dispenser
de venir te prendre ? dit le Crabe avec lassitude, car tout être
humain que tuait le Crabe lui avait posé la même question.
— Mais je commençais seulement à comprendre l’effet produit
par mes chants, dit Leo.
— C’est peut-être bien pour cela, dit le Crabe, dont l’étreinte se
resserra.
— Tu avais dit que tu ne viendrais pas avant que j’eusse pris le
monde aux épaules, râla Leo, en tombant à la renverse.
— Je tiens toujours ma parole. Tu as réalisé cela par trois fois, au
moyen de trois chants. Que veux-tu de plus ?
— Laisse-moi vivre encore assez pour voir le monde l’apprendre,
implora Leo. Laisse-moi m’assurer que mes chants…
— Rendent les hommes braves ? dit le Crabe. Même alors il
resterait un homme qui a eu peur. Virgo était plus brave que toi.
Viens.
Leo se trouvait tout proche de la bouche infatigable et insatiable.
— J’oubliais, dit-il simplement. Virgo était plus brave. Mais je suis
aussi un dieu, et je n’ai pas peur.
— Qu’est-ce que ça me fait ? dit le Crabe.
Alors la parole fut ravie à Leo, et il gisait inerte et muet, dans
l’attente de la mort.
Leo fut le dernier des Enfants du Zodiaque. Après sa mort il
surgit une race de petits hommes vils, qui pleurnichaient, geignaient
et se lamentaient parce que les Maisons les tuaient eux et les leurs,
eux qui souhaitaient vivre à jamais sans la moindre souffrance. Ils
n’accroissaient pas le nombre de leurs jours, mais ils accroissaient
déplorablement leurs peines, et il n’y avait plus d’Enfants du
Zodiaque pour les guider, et la plupart des chants de Leo s’étaient
perdus.
Mais il avait gravé sur la tombe de Virgo la dernière strophe du
chant de Virgo, qui figure en tête de ce récit.
Un enfant des hommes, venu des milliers d’années après, la
débarrassa du lichen, lut les vers, et les appliqua à un autre malheur
que celui où les avait destinés Leo. Comme c’était un homme, les
hommes crurent qu’il avait composé ces vers lui-même ; mais ils
sont l’œuvre de Leo, l’Enfant du Zodiaque, et ils enseignent comme
il l’enseignait, que quelque chose qui nous arrive ou non, nous
autres hommes n’en devons pas être effrayés.
FIN
IMPRIMERIE NELSON, ÉDIMBOURG, ÉCOSSE

PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK
MONSEIGNEUR L'ÉLÉPHANT ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions

will be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.

copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright
in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and without
paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General
Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and
distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if
you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the
trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the
Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such
as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and
printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in
the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright
law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the

free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this
work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase
“Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of
the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or
online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and

Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand,
agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to
abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using
and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for
obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms
of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only

be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by
people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
There are a few things that you can do with most Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There
are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™
electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and
help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright
law in the United States and you are located in the United
States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying,
distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project
Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will
support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project
Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms
of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with
its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project

Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other

immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project
Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United

States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United
States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is

derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to
anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges.
If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of
paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use
of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth
in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is

posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder.
Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™
License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright
holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project

Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files
containing a part of this work or any other work associated with
Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or

providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project

Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -

Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If

you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set

forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the

Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500

West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws

regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states

where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot

make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current

donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and

Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Crime, Criminality and Criminal Justice 3rd Edition All Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Crime, Criminality and Criminal Justice 3rd Edition All Chapter

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Crime, Criminality and Criminal Justice 3rd Edition All Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

(eBook PDF) Crime, Criminality and

Criminal Justice 3rd Edition

(eBook PDF) Multiculturalism, Crime, and Criminal

(eBook PDF) Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice 5th

(eBook PDF) A History of Crime and the American

(eBook PDF) Crime and Criminology (Aspen Criminal

(eBook PDF) Criminal Investigation (Justice Series)

(eBook PDF) Criminal Procedure (Justice Series) (The

(eBook PDF) Foundations of Criminal Justice 3rd Edition

(eBook PDF) Introduction to Criminal Justice: Practice

CHAPTER 5: CRIME AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY.................................. 107

CHAPTER 6: CRIME AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCE................................. 133

CHAPTER 7: CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY........................................ 157

CHAPTER 8: CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON.................................... 181

CHAPTER 9: CRIMES AGAINST CONVENTION................................... 205

CHAPTER 10: CRIMES OF THE POWERFUL........................................ 231

CHAPTER 11: TRANSNATIONAL CRIMES AND GLOBAL

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

CHAPTER 12: ECO-​CRIME AND GREEN CRIMINOLOGY................... 281

CHAPTER 13: CYBERCRIME AND DIGITAL AND

PART 2: INSTITUTIONS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE................................. 319

CHAPTER 14: POLICE ROLES AND TECHNIQUES.............................. 327

CHAPTER 15: DIFFERENT POLICING FOR DIFFERENT PEOPLE...... 350

CHAPTER 16: FORENSIC STUDIES...................................................... 373

CHAPTER 17: LAW AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION............................ 394

CHAPTER 18: COURTS AND COURT PROCESSES............................. 413

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

Interpreting the law......................................................................................... 421

CHAPTER 19: JUVENILE JUSTICE........................................................ 427

CHAPTER 20: ACCESS AND ALTERNATIVES TO JUSTICE................ 445

CHAPTER 21: JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND SENTENCING................... 466

CHAPTER 22: PUNISHMENT AND PENALTY....................................... 500

CHAPTER 23: INCARCERATION AND PRISONISATION..................... 524

CHAPTER 24: COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS....................................... 553

CHAPTER 25: REHABILITATION AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE......... 586

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

CHAPTER 26: CRIME PREVENTION..................................................... 602

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

5.1 Prison entrants’ employment/​education status in last 30 days, 2015

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

23.3 Age-​standardised imprisonment rates (per 100,000 adult population)

1.1 Methods of research..............................................................................20

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

14.1 Composition of Victoria Police as at 24 June 2017—​sworn

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

Crime and criminal law

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

The act and the intent

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

IMPRIMERIE NELSON, ÉDIMBOURG, ÉCOSSE

CHAPTER 12: ECO-CRIME AND GREEN CRIMINOLOGY................... 281

5.1 Prison entrants’ employment/education status in last 30 days, 2015

23.3 Age-standardised imprisonment rates (per 100,000 adult population)

14.1 Composition of Victoria Police as at 24 June 2017—sworn