AEWAR5 days ago (edited)

Duomo di Firenze (Florence Cathedral) This is a photograph of the structure without it’s facade in
the 1800s. The familiar facade we see today was a result of Italy’s own small Gothic revival (or
Victorian Restoration). If you look closely you can see the imprints of the former facade. The
Gothic revival facade took 11 years to complete. Why were so many cathedral west fronts and
facades changed in the 19th century? A lot of the time, like with St Albans and Hereford Cathedral,
the west front is actually the most “advanced” looking area of the structure. The revival additions
are certainly the most fresh looking in terms of construction and stonework. General questions to
ponder: Let’s say most 19th century construction photographs of structures completed in a timespan
of 1-5 years are fake and doctored - would it not have been more efficient and convincing for the
powers that be to just make the timeframe of construction longer and more realistic in the narrative
rather than go to the great length of fabricating almost all of the tens of thousands of 19th century
photographs? If the powers that be had the foresight to fabricate and stage photographs as early on
as they did, and for us in the 21st century, why not just withhold the camera’s invention until later
into the 20th century? If it’s not possible to build any of the 19th century structures within the short
construction timeframes attached to them via industrial revolution technology and it’s also
impossible for humans to build grand cathedrals over hundreds of years with medieval technology -
what is a suitable timeframe of construction for these structures and what are the proposed means of
construction?
Show less
211
71 Comments
SORT BY
jay
5 days ago
Keep it up AEwar . Breath of fresh air. These structures are possible because they exist plane as
day. It does not mean to say history isn't shrouded in lies. Got to walk the middle path and read
inbetween the lines now instead of standing at one extreme or the other . Peace
22

REPLY
Hide reply

AEWAR
5 days ago
Spot on!
13
REPLY

Bari Duncan NZ
3 days ago
It's so easy to get drawn in by our false history, that once cognitive dissonance sets in it is hard to
open up to further information. All you recently show makes logical sense when shown
documentation, photographs and videos. Your work is the most outstanding ever. It's like seeing the
REAL earth for the first time. My true education started with people like you. Thank you
EWAR
2
REPLY

Meli Davidson
5 days ago
Good questions to ponder! Another good one is where is the evidence of the army of builders &
craftsmen that would have been required to erect such grandeloquent structures? What methods
were used? How did they distress & age the stones to appear antiquated rather than new? Why did
they age them? Where is the documentation of labour & construction i.e. materials, transportation,
workmen & their wages, etc? Always left with more questions...but the journey is quite enjoyable.

Show less
12
REPLY
Hide 4 replies

Jonny Danger
5 days ago
I asked those questions at a Chicago library one time. blank stare
5
REPLY

AEWAR
5 days ago
I aim to release videos covering these questions as they are good questions and need
addressing. In terms of the distress and age one - most structures they tell us were put up
in the 19th century do actually look, from my experience, very fresh. A lot of the cathedrals
are more difficult to work out because they are a collage of different time periods (LLG:2).
But as I continue to release I'm hoping to put this all in context and increase understanding
on this issue. Some of it is quite mindblowing. And I wont be just covering cathedrals, but
most styles of architecture. That's the goal anyway.
Show less
10
REPLY

Meli Davidson
5 days ago
@AEWAR very much looking forward & appreciate your mental dexterity & objectivity. The
esoteric & mathematical symbolism used is of extreme interest to me. You've added much
to my own research ~ lots of gratitude for your efforts.
3
REPLY

Neaality Gandhi
5 days ago
@AEWAR I hope you cover or uncover more information about 'ancient' Mosques and
even The Kaaba.
1
REPLY

JDubb
4 days ago
AEwar great work! What do you think of Vibes of Cosmos' moon map and the shifting magnetic
pole? Creating a constanly shifting Frozen Arctic and Antarctic exclusion zones.
4
REPLY
Hide reply

AEWAR
5 days ago
It's a cool concept but it depends on proving that the magnetic pole and the sun's path are
connected. Does the moving magnetic pole affect the sun's overall path or just it's shifting
obliquity, eccentricity etc? In both scenarios the exclusion zones would be affected but if
it's the latter it would not affect it like voc suggests it does.
4
REPLY

Albatrosspro
5 days ago
Interesting if it’s the West facade that they kept redoing. The west direction is associated with the
setting sun or the sun’s death. The planet Saturn is strongest in the western part of the sky, in some
astrological traditions.
4
REPLY
Hide reply

AEWAR
5 days ago
It is an interesting one. I have a couple of theories that I hope to present later down the
line. Maybe I'll find some more info by then too.
7
REPLY

Neaality Gandhi
5 days ago
With all this knowledge you have and are gaining, have you thought about writing a book on this
and other subjects you've covered?
8
REPLY
Hide 2 replies

L
6 days ago
@AEWAR Would you ever do interviews? Given the right conditions?
3
REPLY

golden1789
5 days ago
A book / books would be marvellous - literally.
4
REPLY

sholland42
5 days ago
It’s all a rabbit hole, you never get to the bottom of it. There’s one truth, and it’s Almighty God.
7

REPLY
Hide reply

Julio Morales
5 days ago
all the real answers are with GOD
4
REPLY

Wise Truths
2 days ago
I have seen with my own eyes the cathedral..the first thing that caught my eyes were the magical
sigils above each window and each of them are different in their complexity almost as if they were
put there to create a magnetic field around the cathedral either to keep something out..or lock
something in...
REPLY
Hide 2 replies

AEWAR
3 days ago
Those "sigils" are amazing and very complex. What makes you think they are necessarily
good sigils though? I've been to Florence three times now, the structure is incredible. I
cover it in a later ep.
1
REPLY
Wise Truths
3 days ago
@AEWAR Energy is neither good nor bad it is the intention put in activating the sigils that
defines the spell itself..although i can say from what i personally felt, the whole city of
Florence is surrounded of negativity..something really dark in the air...looking forward to
watch your coming episode!!! I watched all your content and it is mind blowing keep it up
man!!!
1
REPLY

Rebelspirit
4 days ago (edited)
What if everything is made up like simulalation theory suggests Jason breashers at archaix... this
journey just keeps getting more and more interesting for shur I loved the first videos here but I
seem to be loosing interest in all this stuff and am working on myself and my own connection good
luck everyone see you on the other side
1
REPLY
Hide 2 replies

AEWAR
5 days ago
I don't really buy into the simulation theory. I haven't seen Jason Breasher so maybe he
has some interesting points but I'm trying to avoid any new theories and stuff from "reset"
you tubers at the minute and just focusing on writing and reading. I lost interest in you
tube last year and the stuff I do watch on it now tends to be a little different.
2
REPLY

Rebelspirit
5 days ago
@AEWAR I understand completely I can't hardly watch many folks anymore either... I just
want you to know that the time and effort you've put into this is greatly appreciated you
rock
1
REPLY

Kato Dan
4 days ago
It’s a Cathode. They had a purpose some will never understand.
2
REPLY
one wheelson
5 days ago
Perhaps answers could be found by talking to those that do this type of work today. I imagine at
least a few of them know their crafts past better than most. Also the methods in which we 3D print
today may be a clue to how such things were accomplished in the past.
2
REPLY
Hide 7 replies

AEWAR
5 days ago (edited)
I recommend this approach too. Many big cathedrals in Europe have on site restoration
masons, as do a lot of heritage sites. Just ordinary people who have a wealth of
knowledge and talent to share. Definitely worth talking to them if you can. Helped me a lot.
8
REPLY

Jonny Danger
5 days ago
I work construction my whole life and the quality and materials used get worse every year.
They haven’t a clue whether a worker, craftsman or architect.
3
REPLY

Jonny Danger
5 days ago
@AEWAR why did you say you were wrong in the other video?
1
REPLY

AEWAR
5 days ago
@Jonny Danger We've regressed year after year, century after century. I was wrong
because I generalised, regurgitated and reinforced a wild theory that actually has the
potential to be very damaging. I do not want to contribute toward any kind of historical
erasure if it's based solely on theory, and bad theory at that. I'm not saying there aren't big
lies and that architecture isn't a integral aspect of those lies but this whole one world
unified civilisation running on free energy utopian narrative is wrong. And I've found
instances of similar things happening in the past, which are quite suspicious.
Show less
7
REPLY
Jonny Danger
5 days ago
@AEWAR so do you believe the great reset happened in the 1860’s-70’s?
2
REPLY

AEWAR
5 days ago
@Jonny Danger No, too much historical continuity. I believe it happened at the end of the
middle ages and then everything changed. Everything that came after has been in
response to that. Renaissance, reformation, industrial revolution and then now. That
doesn't mean there hasnt been financial resets, culls, wars etc. But that was when the
"great" reset happened, in my eyes anyway.
8
REPLY

one wheelson
5 days ago
@AEWAR This type of awareness is appreciated. Seeing the ease at which DALL-E (AI
'art' system) can create authentic looking documents, makes it even more pertinent.
Interesting the timing behind the 'discovery' of many lost 'tartarian' documents and the rise
of AI. Makes ya go hmmmmmmm
5
REPLY

Boston Ray Mudflood Adventures

7 hours ago
Awesome building
REPLY

LaTRaY YaShaLaH
4 days ago
Distractions… simply is what it is. The answer can’t be more clear enough. Idk what has happened
to you but this is clearly distraction especially from how your old work was orchestrated. You been
on the same subject for 3 videos now. Not saying it’s bad, what ever happened to the old world
happened. What’s important is now.
3
REPLY
Hide reply

DJ BROWNIE UK™©
4 days ago (edited)
men in black probably paid him a visit with The offer that no one refuses - the Golden
Handcuffs
REPLY

C4 TMH
4 days ago
In America in 1935, millions of workers were employed by the government funded Works Progress
Administration to build and replace buildings, bridges, dams, roads, etc. Also artists were
commissioned for murals, posters, music, oral histories, etc. Notable structures were the Hoover
Dam in Nevada, Lincoln Tunnel NYC, and the San Francisco/Oakland bridge. Also interesting is
the Cathedral of Saint John the Divine in NYC, constructed between 1892 and 1941. It is currently
being renovated. Additionally, the National Cathedral in Washington DC, constructed between
1906 and 1988 said to be Neo-Gothic.
1

REPLY

L
5 days ago
@AEWAR Would you ever do interviews? Given the right conditions?
4
REPLY

Zee Jafri
4 days ago
Give it up bro. You’re trying to study ancient architecture without having any background
knowledge in this field and just assuming all that stuff about it. Your videos are getting boring and
watch, at the end you’ll just end up finding out that these magnificent buildings were made by really
gifted people albeit very many of them since no one was in a real rush at that time and people didn’t
get paid as much. As different ages came, they simply made their own additions to the buildings.
That’s called RENOVATIONS! Reno’s are done all the time. You’re taking people on a wild goose
chase again. Just stick to the flat earth stuff it’s more interesting.
Show less
REPLY
Hide reply

AEWAR
5 days ago
lol no chance, BRO. I'm also not a physicist or a geographer. However, you don't pay for
anything here therefore you are not a stakeholder or customer that gets to make demands,
you are a consumer. Either consume the boring or do not, simples.
8
REPLY

Melissa Schultz
4 days ago
Thank you!!!!
1
REPLY

Yahshua's Disciple
4 days ago
Will we ever know the truth ? Hopefully at the resurrection on judgement day...
1
REPLY

Mick Guadagnoli
5 days ago
I'm just going to go out and ask..are you saying they built all these buildings exactly how they say?
And that their narrative is correct?
3
REPLY
Hide 6 replies

AEWAR
5 days ago (edited)
What I have been able to discern through research and getting out are the following 1)
most of the architecture is very possible to build 2) there are a lot of shady things going on
with the construction but it isn't the impossibility of it all but rather issues around
pseudomasonry, who built what, how they have used architecture to actually rewrite
history 3) I have come to the conclusion that the "impossibility" narrative on these
structures is actually a massive distraction from some of the larger things going on with
architecture. 4) there do, however, exist many impossible structures by the narratives
standards - pyramids, baalbek etc. However, if poured concrete comes into the equation
then again it reinforces my second point, less about impossibility more about shadiness.
Show less
9
REPLY

Mick Guadagnoli
5 days ago
 @AEWAR I disagree with lots of those sentiments..way way to many questions to have a
back and forth with but that's ok. what I don't disagree with is the massive service you
have done and the ridiculous amount of details you have put in your research. This comes
with lots of time and effort and I have learned so much stuff, and I still show people a lot
of lhofl and what in the world happened. The question seemed sort of snarky and stand
offish on it it's own so I should have also throw in that no matter what answer you give I'm
going to continue to watch and support your work. I totally understand that your previous
theory had flaws, as all do. I still think you were MUCH MUCH closer then this but again
that's alright. I'm not sure why such a dramatic shift when it still leaves such tremendous
flaws, but I sincerely hope it was in good faith. There was a lot of your old videos I felt
deep in my bones. As mentioned above, no theory is with out flaws..but I was thinking of
entirely different flaws than you were. Just because you have switched points of view
doesn't mean I will hold any ill will or will stop watching, but that also doesn't mean I or
anyone has to agree with it. With that being said no matter how much I disagree (and I do
strongly disagree) with some sentiments, your previous work is so well done and has had
such an impact that I am going to see this through. You absolutely deserve that! EVEN
THEN, after finishing, if I disagree with your end conclusion I will still be happy to have
watched it. I'll be on the look out as YouTube won't tell me when your videos are ready
even with the notification. I hope you find middle ground and don't try to disprove
EVERYTHING you said, as there is to much good stuff. Thank you for responding. I know
people can be brutal, I think it comes from the fact that people still agree with what you
used to say.
Show less
6
REPLY

Caiman
5 days ago
@Mick Guadagnoli Thanks for taking the time to lay this out - I feel the same way. There
was something spectacularly compelling about LHFE, and I can't quite let go of it. I feel
that his direction there was yielding more truth, the fruit was better. I learned about the
moon, water, cymatics, and dozens of other concepts, and a lot of it seemed accurate. I
was concerned only about what direction he would take "this isn't to discredit the life of
the Son of God. Be patient and you'll see" (paraphrasing), while suggesting that the ether is
the Holy Spirit. I dont think that was correct, and that's important - but otherwise I thought
his previous work brought glory to God and truth to light.
Show less
2
REPLY

We The People
5 days ago
@Mick Guadagnoli in a different reply he stated , a one world utopian civilization utilizing
free energy was a wrong theory to be pushing. I agree
3
REPLY
Mick Guadagnoli
5 days ago
@We The People this is a HUGE and I mean a HUGE topic. I also said it had flaws, and as
I said to him I don't feel like having a back and forth. I understand that he may not be
correct overall, but the harnessing of free energy and all of his other work about royal
families and such IS spot on. Was it a utopia? Who knows..one civilization? Who knows..I
don't necessarily think that is true either, but I do agree with the overall assumption and
will never go back on the fact that these people did not build these ancient cities and
ridiculous structures. Seriously? We are now saying that picture of San Francisco in 1870
WAS built in 20 years? The city shows signs of classical, Roman Greco, and several other
different kinds of architecture. It's a city for 2,000,000 people.. Nope, I'll never believe that
no matter who says otherwise.. And that's just one of thousdands of examples. . And that
is absolutely huge. I don't care if it's the Roman greko or the neo classical style or any
other kind.. either way in my opinion they absolutely lie about how they said they built it
and by who. And you want to know the truth? That doesn't even concern me that much.
When I talk about this stuff to people I don't say there was a one world utopia. That isn't
his is describe it all. I never really thought he did either.. There is definitely way way more
to this..simply doing a 360 and just saying "yep, they did it" doesn t make sense to me. As I
said in my above post, I'm seeing this out because this man is a legend for what he's done.
I'm happy either way. My other main point though was no matter how he flops nobody has
to follow and believe every word he says, and nobody has to ignore everything he says.
Take our own experiences and objectively without any prejudice or bias and ask ourselves
does this feel right? Does this make sense? Etc etc. It's what makes us human. If people
have come this far and grasped what he has said, they understand more than they know
and probably have exceptional skills themselves..
Show less
REPLY

The Radical Rational

4 days ago
You have to look the islamic civilization they built rounded arches hundreds of years before europe,
islam started in the year 610 the muslims influenced European architecture, read the quran you will
benefit from the information keep an open mind stay blessed brother
Show less
REPLY

Krystal Cameron
5 days ago
All roads leading to Germany?
REPLY

Emerald Ambience
5 days ago
Ewar , which Nationality are u?
3
REPLY
Hide reply
Borracho Tarot
5 days ago
Can someone tell me the best flat earth channel? I used to get that info here but those videos ate
gone.
5
REPLY
Hide 6 replies

jlauro263
5 days ago
Vibes of Cosmos
2
REPLY

Erin O
4 days ago
Eric Dubay
REPLY

jlauro263
4 days ago
FPV Angel
REPLY

Perinne
4 days ago
Have you watched Ewaranon's first series called What on earth happened? in short WOEH.
It has 13 parts.
REPLY

Deep Throat
4 days ago
Me agree.
REPLY

Jordan I
5 days ago
Why didn't they just delay the invention of the personal computer and internet and bitcoin until after
convid and food shortages?
REPLY
Hide 8 replies
AEWAR
5 days ago
because the computer, internet and bitcoin are integral to the implementation of what they
want to achieve. I can't draw the same conclusion with photography in the mid 1800s. In
the 20th century, however, yes.
7
REPLY

Jordan I
5 days ago
@AEWAR these tools helped wake people up, got people out of precarious financial
situations and less dependent on the system. I suppose they want some people to be
awake and self sufficient?
2
REPLY

AEWAR
5 days ago
@Jordan I I believe they do want some people awake yes. Self-sufficient less so.
5
REPLY

Paul Barratt
5 days ago
@Jordan I Like all technology and discoveries, it's a double edged sword. They need
certain things for their agenda, likewise humanity will always find multifunctionality in
everything. They say "Do it this way". We say "Fuck you, I'm gonna do it my way". Life is
about balance. The cosmos is about balance. Every thing is multifunctional. The middle
way.
Show less
3
REPLY

Paul Barratt
4 days ago
@Paul B Why is your highlighted comment not showing up the replies?
REPLY

AEWAR
4 days ago
 @Paul Barratt I also cannot see it on here. It's on my notifications feed though. In case you can see
this Paul B, I agree. Acceptable collateral damage.
REPLY