Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download PDF of (Original PDF) Alternate Processes in Photography: Technique, History, and Creative Potential All Chapter
Full Download PDF of (Original PDF) Alternate Processes in Photography: Technique, History, and Creative Potential All Chapter
Full Download PDF of (Original PDF) Alternate Processes in Photography: Technique, History, and Creative Potential All Chapter
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-a-short-course-in-
photography-film-and-darkroom-9th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-translational-medicine-
in-cns-drug-development-volume-29/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/progress-in-heterocyclic-
chemistry-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-a-short-course-in-
photography-digital-3rd-edition/
(eBook PDF) Creative Strategy in Advertising 11th
Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-creative-strategy-in-
advertising-11th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-marketing-in-creative-
industries-value-experience-and-creativity-2015th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-fit-well-core-concepts-
and-labs-in-physical-fitness-and-wellness-alternate-edition-13th-
edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-practice-architecture-
technique-and-representation-2nd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-fundamentals-of-trial-
technique-4e/
ALTERNATE
PROCESSES IN
PHOTOGRAPHY
Technique, History, and Creative Potential
Brian Arnold
With offices in
Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Printing number: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Historical Introduction.................................................... 19
Chapter 1 Negatives........................................1 Making Paper.................................................................. 21
Paper Terminology..........................................................23
Digital Negatives................................................................1 Tooth.............................................................................. 23
Required Materials........................................................ 1 Finish............................................................................... 23
Darkroom Negatives.........................................................1 Sizing............................................................................. 24
Required Materials........................................................ 1 Acid-Free....................................................................... 24
The Importance of Making Good Negatives............ 2 Deckle............................................................................ 24
Historical Introduction...................................................... 3 Grain.............................................................................. 25
Traditional Darkroom Options...................................... 6 Weight........................................................................... 25
Digital Negatives............................................................... 8 Handmade Paper....................................................... 25
Primary Photoshop Tools............................................. 8 Machine-Made Paper............................................... 26
Contrast Controls: Levels Moldmade Paper....................................................... 26
and Curves................................................... 8 Types of Paper.................................................................26
Image Mode....................................................10 Writing Paper.............................................................. 27
Invert...................................................................10 Drawing Paper............................................................ 27
Layer Adjustments............................................ 11 Printmaking Paper....................................................... 27
Sharpening.......................................................12 Watercolor Paper....................................................... 28
Image Size........................................................12 Other Options............................................................. 28
Negative Supports......................................................15 Preshrinking......................................................................29
Acetate...............................................................15 Sizing..................................................................................29
Paper and Vellum............................................15 Spray Starch................................................................. 29
Pictorico and Other Inkjet Films....................15 Arrowroot Starch.........................................................30
Film......................................................................16 Gesso............................................................................30
Making the Negative..................................................... 16 Gum Arabic.................................................................30
File Types............................................................................17 Gelatin............................................................................31
Wrapping It Up............................................................... 18 Other Supports................................................................32
There are a number of people I need to thank, people who provided nec-
essary support and encouragement at different stages of my development and ed-
ucation. First, I thank Charles Walters, Eric Paddock, and Frank Gohlke. If I had
not met these men, I would probably have never become a photographer. I was
also fortunate to study with a number of exceptional photographers while work-
ing to complete my MFA, specifically Abelardo Morell and Laura McPhee, both of
whom instilled some essential questions about and love for photography in my
thinking. Also, I thank both Terri Weifenbach and Robert Adams; although never
in the classroom, both these photographers keep teaching me more and more, in
ways that reflect my understanding both of photography and of myself.
I have also been extremely fortunate to have a number of wonderful col-
leagues over the years. I first thank Roger Freeman and Steve Tourlentes, both of
whom took some chances to help get my academic career started. I also thank
Leslie Bellavance at Alfred University and Kaja McGowan at Cornell, who gave
me office space to help complete this book. At the Eastman House, I thank Ross
Knapper and Joe Struble, who spent hours with me helping to find the right pho-
tographers for illustrating the text. I also thank Diane O’Connor and Rich Barker
at Mohawk Paper and Kathleen Flynn at Dieu Donné for the opportunity to see
and learn more about paper production as both an industry and an art. I also
thank Christine Serchia, my biggest fan and greatest supporter for so many years.
I have also been fortunate to have great and challenging proofreaders. Rich-
ard Sullivan has provided valuable assistance at every step of this project and gave
insight into my chapter on ziatype and kallitype printing. Richard and his wife,
Melody Bostick, have provided hospitality and support in so many ways, out of an
obvious love for photography and its many forms. John Coffer is an incredible re-
source for photographic history and techniques and lent support in my writing on
wet plate collodion photography. I also thank Laurie Snyder and Mark Osterman
for looking over different chapters at various stages of this project. Geoffrey Ber-
liner’s wealth of knowledge on photographic history and technique proved inspi-
rational at a time I needed to work through some struggles in pulling this all
together.
I also thank the photographers who contributed pictures to this book, many I
have admired and many I am grateful to call long-time friends: Andrea Modica,
Emmet Gowin, Joni Sternbach, Accra Shepp, Paul Graham, Lois Conner, Willie
Osterman, France Scully Osterman, the Getty Museum, the Colorado Historical
Society and the Denver Public Library, Laurie Snyder, John Wood (in memory),
Carol Wood, Tony Gonzalez, Dan Estabrook, John Dugdale, Zoe Zimmerman,
It was close to 20 years ago, but I still remember it vividly. I was taking a
week-long, intensive workshop on photographic printmaking taught by Frank
Gohlke (Figure I-1). We spent our time together working on advanced silver gela-
tin techniques—bleaching, toning, using print brighteners—and were also intro-
duced to a few other of what we called alternative processes: palladium, kallitype,
and cyanotype. Many of these techniques have continued to be a part of my life’s
work, but that is not what I remember most.
About halfway through the workshop, at the end of a long day of printing,
Frank pulled out some boxes of photographs he brought along to show us. This
was an important time in Frank’s career; Measure of Emptiness had been recently
published, and he was still involved in making his photographs of Mount
St. Helens, rephotographing some of the original landscapes he made during his
initial survey of the eruption. He showed us his prints from these projects. And
then he also showed us pictures he had collected from friends and colleagues: Eric
Paddock, Lois Conner, Robert Adams, Paul Caponigro, and Walker Evans. As he
spoke of these pictures, he was full of wonderful wisdom, intelligence, and love. It
hit me like a ton of bricks: I knew I had to know more about this way of
thinking.
Close to this time, I landed my first job in photography, working in the photo
archives at the Colorado Historical Museum. My first day there, the chief curator
in the department, Eric Paddock, came down with a small selection of 20 × 24
glass plate negatives made by William Henry Jackson and the Detroit Publishing
Co. (Color Plate 1). He gave us two days to print the negatives. There were three of
us working in the darkroom, and it took all of us to handle and position the nega-
tives. These were a remarkable couple of afternoons: To see the skill and tech-
nique that must have gone into making such large negatives; to see these views of
landscapes in Colorado I had known all my life; and to share in these experiences
just by helping to make the prints. That really sealed the deal; I knew I was a
photographer.
Working in the museum offered a number of other resources and learning
opportunities. In addition to housing the William Henry Jackson and Detroit
Publishing Co. archives, it was here I first saw photographs by Timothy O ’Sullivan,
Laura Gilpin, and Lee Friedlander, as well as my first albumen prints, tintype
albums, and carte-de-vistes.
F I-2: When I first started It was a couple of years down the road before I set up my first photographic
photographing seriously, I studio. I was young, recently out of college, and working for minimum wage. I
began by working from the knew from these past experiences that I did not need expensive equipment to
Colorado landscape, largely
make photographs. I was living in Denver at the time and knew it would be easy
based on things I learned
working at the archives of the
to print my photographs under the sun (Figure I-2). I bought an inexpensive 4 × 5
Colorado History Museum. All camera. Then, I went to a junkyard north of the city and got a used, stainless steel
my photographs from that time sink and finally salvaged construction materials from my dad’s business for coun-
were palladium prints printed tertops and built my first darkroom for around $100.
under the sun. Petroleum Despite my lack of resources, I wanted to make pictures as well crafted as the
Refineries in Commerce City,
photographs Frank showed us that afternoon. I made gum bichromate and platinum/
CO, 1996. Photograph by the
author. palladium prints under the sun. I did this on my own for several years, working
with simple resources and trying to
make beautiful printed photographs
about my home in Colorado.
I like to tell all young and aspir-
ing photographers that although each
of them has a camera in pocket (is it
possible to buy a phone without a
camera now?), none of them knows as
much about photography as they
think. To illustrate this point, I turn
my classroom into a camera obscura
(a trick I learned from Abelardo
Morell while working with him
during my years in graduate school;
Figure I-3). It is not difficult: make
the room light tight and then make a
small, circular hole for light to come
in. Yet without fail, the students are
dumbfounded when they see an image from the outside world projected on the
room’s wall and without the aid of any technology. I then go on to talk about how we
reached photography today, showing them different cameras and talking about the
evolution of photographic techniques and processes.
There are more photographic possibilities and processes available to the pho-
tographer than most recognize. It has been more than 170 years since Henry Fox
Talbot (1800–1877) and Louis Daguerre (1787–1851) secured patents for the first
photographic processes. And in those years, the drive to make pictures has gone
down many roads, and many processes have come and gone. What we today call
alternative processes typically references photographic techniques that never had
any commercial applications. Despite having no commercial appeal, many of
these processes continue to be used today because they provide unique ways to
feed our imaginations and to reflect our experiences.
I firmly believe that real photographic literacy today means looking at and
knowing as many photographic techniques as possible. In my teaching practice, I
try not to prioritize any photographic technology; I introduce and encourage
techniques from the 19th century to the present. In this transitional period, as F I-3: Camera Obscura Image
photography becomes more and more digitized, I often regret how quickly and of Museums across the Street in
easily we forgot what we once knew. I believe that the more tools and techniques Our Bedroom, 1991. To make
one has as a photographer, the greater the photographic vocabulary and thus the this photograph, Morell turned
the room into a camera
more possibilities available.
obscura using black plastic
Photographs, in my mind, are still objects, and I make a distinction between with a small hole cut into it
photographs and images. The image is an essential part of the photograph, per- over one of the windows and
haps the most essential part, and yet the photograph is an object that exists in a then placed a camera in the
physical form. What is represented in a photograph is always an essential part of room and made an eight-hour-
its meaning—and I repeatedly emphasize to my students that this is the most long exposure of light moving
through the hole and into the
important part of any photographic inquiry—but the process with which the pho-
room. The picture is about the
tograph resolves also gives it meaning. As the maker, you develop your own rela- most basic phenomenon of
tionship to an image through process (and I do believe this helps give life to the light and photography.
picture). But also, how the photograph looks and ages is part of how we derive © Abelardo Morrel, silver
meaning from an image. In pursuing my work over the years, I have always tried gelatin print; courtesy of the
George Eastman Museum.
to find new ways to emphasize my
inquiry into what the form of the
photograph can be.
In teaching photography, I like
to encourage the same from my stu-
dents. Any real practitioner will
make unique contributions to any
photographic process and use the
rules and procedures as guidelines
and suggestions, ultimately finding
a unique approach. Alternative pro-
cesses necessitate such thinking.
The processes are more idiosyncratic
and particular than most of the
mainstream photographic tech-
niques. Typically, the students I see
excelling the most in my courses are
the ones that can read the text and
follow directions and then learn
from the materials and processes
themselves.
considering the stainless steel models with temperature control. (If you are devel-
oping film, temperature control is important.) I bought my first sink for about $20
in a junkyard. Many photographers save money by building sinks out of wood and
then lining them with epoxy or plastic resins.
The last thing I recommend for an alternative process darkroom—short of the
standard equipment of timers, drying screens, etc.—is a good-quality scale.
Learning to weigh and mix your own chemistry can be satisfying (photography
can still be alchemy) and can also save you a great deal of money.
Every time I teach my course Alternative Processes in Photography, I like to
include an essay by Edward Weston called “Seeing Photographically.” In the essay,
Weston criticizes photographers who get too caught up in technique. What really
matters, he says, is that you are making the images you want, the images connect
with your experience, and that you have enough control over the technique that
you can repeat the results. Seeing photographically means understanding your
materials enough that you can previsualize your pictures. If you can develop this
capability, it does not matter whether your technique is good or bad, but simply
that it is true to your vision.
It is easy for photographers working with alternative processes to become
obsessed with technique. Many of the processes are unforgiving of poor tech-
nique. Anything worth knowing and doing takes a great deal of time to learn and
to develop any kind of proficiency. Working in alternative processes in photogra-
phy takes patience and perseverance. Yet once you have the techniques down, it
can provide a unique and satisfying way to pursue photography and creative life.
This book is intended as an introduction to the processes, and there is much more
about each of them you can learn. Each practitioner will develop his/her own ap-
proach, and in my mind this is a necessary part of owning and previsualizing a
photographic process. This book will give you the tools, resources, and ideas to
begin working in an alternative processes darkroom.
Learn More
• Lyle Rexer’s historical text, Photography’s Antiquarian Avant-Garde,
provides a greater look into how alternative processes developed in and
after the 1970s.
• Burning with Desire, by the historian Geoffrey Batchen, argues that pho-
tography was more than the result of individual genius and creators,
rather, the product of extensive cultural inquiry.
• The historian Larry Schaaf has compiled a series of letters exchanged be-
tween William Henry Fox Talbot and Sir John Herschel in a book called
Out of the Shadows. These exchanges provide insight into the work of
these early pioneers.
• “Seeing Photographically” by Edward Weston is reprinted in Classic
Essays on Photography, edited by Alan Trachtenberg.
• For more complete information on light sources, I recommend the web-
site unblinkingeye: http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Light/light.html.
With few exceptions, the printing processes outlined here require contact print-
ing, meaning the size of the print is the same as that of the negative. This chapter
will cover several methods for making large-format negatives, emphasizing digi-
tal options.
Digital Negatives
Required Materials
• Digital capture (camera or scanner)
• Photoshop (or similar image-processing software)
• Printer
• Negative support materials (paper, film, acetate, inkjet film, etc.)
Darkroom Negatives
Required Materials
• Orthochromatic film
• Black and white enlarging equipment and chemistry
When using darkroom methods, first a black and white negative is enlarged to
the scale of the final print. A film positive is produced directly onto the orthochro-
matic film (or film that is sensitive to all visible spectrums of light except red). Be-
cause of their sensitivity, these films are unique in that they can be used under red
safelights (please note, red, not the usual amber lights!), which allows for an easy
working process. This film is processed like any black and white paper, meaning
that once exposed, the sheet of film is processed in a developer bath, stop, and then
fixer. The film should then be processed in an agent for clearing out the fixer and
finally washed. Once the film positive is correctly developed, washed, and dried, it
is contact printed to a second piece of ortho film to produce the final negative.
This very richness of control facilities often acts as a barrier to creative work.
The fact is that very few photographers ever master their medium. Instead
they allow the medium to master them and go on an endless squirrel cage
chase from new lens to new paper to new developer to new gadget, never stay-
ing with one piece of equipment long enough to learn its full capacities, be-
coming lost in a maze of technical information that is of little or no use since
they don’t know what to do with it.
Only long experience will enable the photographer to subordinate tech-
nical considerations to pictorial aims, but the task can be made immeasur-
ably easier by selecting the simplest possible equipment and procedures and
staying with them. . . . The photographer must learn from the outset to regard
his process as a whole. He should not be concerned with the “right exposure,”
“the perfect negative,” etc. Such notions are mere products of advertising my-
thology. Rather he must learn the kind of negative to produce the kind of
print. . . . With practice this kind of knowledge becomes intuitive; the pho-
tographer learns to see a scene or object in terms of his finished print without
having to give conscious thought to the steps that will be necessary to carry
it out.
Although Weston wrote about the black and white techniques and crafts that
defined the discourse of his day, his words are still remarkably valuable and in-
sightful. Indeed, more than ever it is easier to get lost in technology rather than
making the right investment to understand a limited set of tools and, in turn, use
that investment to develop real sensitivity and creative vision.
Weston suggests something else extremely important here: previsualization.
I often make a distinction between making and taking pictures. Taking pictures
is passive, simply grabbing photographs from the things around you without in-
voking any critical thought or creative goal. Making pictures is active and re-
quires more understanding and engagement or, as Weston describes, the ability to
see the end result before even beginning. In working with alternative photo-
graphic processes, that begins with understanding negatives.
Historical Introduction
Until the development of digital photography, with just a few exceptions, making
photographs meant producing a negative before making a positive image. (The
exceptions are daguerreotypes, wet plate collodion positives, Polaroids, and slide
film.) There is no denying that the digital era has pushed the evolution of photog-
raphy extremely rapidly, although it is important to understand that photography
has been in a state of constant transformation since its inception. Although
William Henry Fox Talbot was not the first to patent a photographic process, he
was the primary inventor of the method that came to dominate the medium for
more than a century: the two-step process of making negatives before making
positive prints (for more information, see Chapter 3 on salted paper printing).
Since this process was released to the general public, photography has existed in
a state of constant transformation and development.
The first photographic negatives were made on paper in the process that
Talbot developed in 1839 (Figure 1-1). However, users of Talbot’s system quickly
realized that it had a number of different limitations. When compared with the
rich, detailed images provided by daguerreotypes, the completed photographs
lacked detail and rich tonalities. The first improvement was to varnish the paper
negatives with wax, which allowed for more transparency and limited the distor-
tion in the print caused by the paper fibers in the negative.
The next major development in making photographic negatives occurred in
the 1850s, with the development of the wet plate collodion process and the
switch to glass as the primary support (see Chapter 10 on wet plate photography).
Producing negatives on glass resulted in prints with much richer detail and tonal-
ity and allowed for paper photographs to rival those using Daguerre’s process
(Figure 1-2).
Around 1876, two photographic scientists, Ferdinand Hurter and Vero
Charles Driffield, developed a methodology for calculating the sensitivity of a pho-
tographic emulsion. Their work resulted in the methods of sensitometry and
densitometry known today. Sensitometry provided a way to measure the amount
of silver exposed and developed in a photographic process, whereas densitometry
provided a way to measure the accumulation of silver on the exposed surface,
calculating the optical density of an exposed negative or positive. These discover-
ies paved the way for some important advances in photographic emulsions and
films, resulting in the ability to measure, produce, and market films with different
speeds. This ultimately led the way to roll films, film fast enough to allow for
handheld cameras. This might seem like a small achievement today, but the move-
ment from large-format, plate negatives to handheld cameras using flexible roll
film was an essential link in the ongoing democratization of photography.
A film speed refers to its sensitivity to light, typically measured as an ASA or
ISO. The typical speeds range between 100 and 3200; the higher the number, the
more sensitive the film is to light, and thus it requires less exposure. Although
digital cameras do not use film, the same numbers are still used to identify the
camera’s sensitivity to light.
In 1881, George Eastman founded his Eastman Dry Plate Company in
Rochester, New York, which later was renamed Kodak. In 1885, he released the
first flexible roll films. These products were not made on a clear plastic support.
The light-sensitive emulsion was coated on paper, and during development it was
stripped and transferred to clear, hardened gelatin support for printing. Eastman
released the first transparent plastic film in 1889. These films were highly unsta-
ble and flammable, coated on a surface of nitrocellulose, now typically referred to
as nitrate film. Plastic films were finally perfected in the early 1900s, when
Eastman Kodak released the first safety films, an emulsion coated on cellulose
acetate. It was not until 1954 that Kodak released Tri-X film, which has been the
industry standard for black and white film since then. Black and white film con-
tinues to evolve today, with ongoing advances in film speed and grain structure,
as well as the addition of different dyes to the gelatin emulsion to change the film’s
sensitivity to particular spectrums of light.
The basic idea of color negatives is the same as black and white, with oppo-
sites translated into positive images. In a black and white negative, black from the
negative translates as white in the print and vice versa, whereas in color, blue
prints yellow, magenta prints green, and so on. Because this book does not really
cover color photography (although see Chapter 8 on gum bichromate printing), I
will not go into the advancements in color photography in much detail. It is, how-
ever, worth taking a quick look at how color films developed.
Color photography precedes color negative film, dating back to the inception
of the medium. By the end of the 19th century, there were legitimate color photo-
graphic processes, although they were extremely difficult and time-consuming,
requiring multiple negatives and that colors be printed one at a time. In the early
20th century, the first films began to emerge. The first commercially produced
color films were glass plates, Lumiére Autochrome, released in 1907. Autochrome
was an additive color process, meaning that layering the three primaries of red,
green, and blue (RGB) develops a full color spectrum (Color Plate 6). Later, color
slide film was also based on additive color theory. Overexposure in slide film re-
sulted in bleached-out images and color, the opposite of what we have come to
know in photographic exposure. However, Autochrome film was very slow and
incompatible with the emerging trend of handheld cameras (see Color Plate 7).
Modern color film emerged in 1935, when Kodak introduced Kodachrome,
which was developed on the theory of subtractive color. White light consists of
the entire spectrum of colors. When you shine white light through colored filters
tinted with the three subtractive primaries—cyan (opposite red light), magenta
(opposite green light), and yellow (opposite blue light), or CMYK (“K” stands for
black)—you can create individual colors. The result depends on the amount of
color that is blocked (or subtracted) by the mix of the three filters. Since Koda-
chrome was developed, color film has continued to work on the subtractive theory
of color. (For more on additive and subtractive color, see Chapter 8 on gum bicar-
bonate printing.) (see Color Plates 8 and 9.)
Today, the options for negative production are extremely varied and versatile.
For an example of creative digital negative production, see Color Plate 37. It is still
possible to work with original, large-format camera negatives with a number of
options for enlarging negatives with traditional darkroom practices. The digital
work environment also provides new possibilities for making negatives, with a
broad range of printers and supports available for production. The different print-
ers available—laser, inkjet, and Imagesetters and film recorders—as well as the
incredible array of supports—paper, acetate, and film—all provide unique possi-
bilities for making negatives. Digital options also allow for much easier and
cheaper methods for large-format negative production. Many of the materials
used for making negatives come in rolls for large-format printers.
In 2011, the British photographer Paul Graham released an interesting body
of work, Films, in some ways summarizing the medium of film and photography
up to the day. For these pictures, Graham made high-resolution, tightly cropped
scans of film negatives he produced for previous photographic projects. Through
scanning, each individual grain of silver and color deposit is revealed with in-
credible precision, and the original photograph is no longer visible. The completed
pictures are remarkable abstractions in their own right, but also document the
structure and material of film. In a way, Graham’s Films shows the best of all
photographic worlds, using what is unique about digital imaging to highlight
what is unique about traditional photographic materials (see Color Plate 10).
The cultivation of the vine and wine-making for domestic use were
a part of the yearly routine on the farms of Greece and Italy, while
the finer kinds of wine were a valuable article of commerce. The only
object in the collection which illustrates wine-making is an Arretine
bowl in Case G2 in the Eighth Room, decorated with figures of satyrs
gathering and treading grapes. The process of getting rural produce
to market is represented by two terracotta figures of donkeys with
panniers whose counterparts can be seen in Greece at the present
day (figs. 133-134). The conformation of Greece and Italy, and the
numerous islands of the Mediterranean compelled the inhabitants to
accustom themselves to seafaring from the earliest times. A vase
painting and some clay boats from Cyprus are valuable illustrations
of the type of ship in use in the sixth century. A black-figured krater
of that date in Case 1 has three long boats or war vessels painted
inside the mouth. These vessels were propelled by oars, as the
method of fighting made speed essential to them, though a sail was
used when the wind was favorable. Two of the ships have eleven
oars on a side, and the third has nine. The steersman sits in the
stern with one or two steering paddles. The forecastle is surmounted
by a high stem-post, and between the stern and the forecastle runs a
railing or bulwark. The bow projects in the form of an animal’s head,
probably a fish or a boar, and a large eye is painted just above the
water-line. The edge of the krater has been injured so that the sail
has disappeared, but the single mast can be seen, as well as the
sheets and halyards. A ship of this kind regularly has a square sail
and halyards, brailing-ropes, braces, and sheets. Above the stern
projects an ornament rather like the tail of a bird. It was this that was
taken by the enemy as a trophy (fig. 138). The clay boats from
Cyprus in the same case are of a type frequently found in sixth-
century graves in Amathus. Two of them represent merchant
vessels, as is shown by their breadth and deep hulls. The largest
has strakes along the water-line which held the “under-girding” of
ropes used to prevent the planks from springing in stormy weather,
and large cat-heads at the bows to receive the anchor. The
helmsman sits in the stern with his two steering-oars. Of the two
other boats the smallest is a row-boat, and the other has a deck and
a small deck-house (fig. 139).
FIG. 132. TERRACOTTA MODEL OF A
CART
Very few wooden objects have survived from ancient times, but
examples of the tools used in making them and of metal fittings
remain. The axe-blades from Cyprus in Case 5 and in wall-cases in
the corridor are of almost pure copper. These blades were inserted
in a haft or lashed to a handle. In Case B in the First Room are four
double axes from Crete of the second millennium B.C., and in Case
A in the Fifth Room another of much later date. Handles were
inserted between the two blades, as in the modern hammer. The
chisels, awl, nails, and hinges in Case 5 are Cypriote. In Case B in
the First Room are chisels and an awl, and in Case D 2 several
knives, from Crete. They are especially interesting in that they are
well preserved and of excellent workmanship.
The keys exhibited in Case 5 (figs. 135 and 137) are of three
types. The earlier one is shown with the bolt to which it belongs. The
key when inserted into the bolt pushed upward with its teeth a series
of pegs which fitted into holes in the bolt and took their place. It could
then be used as a handle to pull the bolt backward. The second
consists of a plate provided with notches which lifted a series of
tumblers and allowed the bolt to be shot. The third key belongs to
the type in use today, and as such keys have been found in Pompeii,
they must have been known before 79 A.D. The lock-plate is
perhaps from a strong-box (fig. 136).
Only the balance seems to have been known to the Greeks, but
the Romans made use of the steelyard also. The example shown in
Case 1 does not differ from those of modern times. The hooks and
chains at the end of the rod were used for suspending the articles to
be weighed. Three other hooks, of which two are preserved on
movable rings, were for hanging the steelyard. Each is attached to a
different side. When the steelyard was hung by the hook nearest to
the graduated bar, articles up to twelve pounds could be weighed by
sliding the weights along the bar. The second side of the bar weighs
articles of from five pounds to twenty-two; the third, articles of from
twenty to fifty-eight pounds. The large weight is made of lead
covered with bronze, and weighs two pounds, while the small weight
is entirely of bronze and weighs one ounce (see head-band, p. 109.)
FIG. 138. WAR-VESSELS. VASE PAINTING
The body was prepared for burial by the women of the family, who
anointed it with oil and perfumes, and clothed it in the dress of
common life, usually of white. A wreath of flowers, or of laurel, olive,
or ivy was placed on the head, or in its stead a wreath of gold
leaves. Before the funeral the dead was laid on a couch in the
central hall of the house, with his feet toward the house door. His
relatives and friends came to pay their last respects, and the funeral
dirge was sung. An interesting terracotta relief from Attica on the
north wall of the Second Room represents such an occasion. The
women standing by the bier are tearing their hair as they raise their
voices in the lament (fig. 146). The same scene is frequent on
certain kinds of Greek pottery, notably the great Dipylon vases of the
eighth century B.C., which were used as grave monuments. There
are two Dipylon vases in the Second Room in Cases G and L (fig.
148). On the upper band of each is a scene showing a dead man on
a bier surrounded by his family (see head-band, p. 121). An
interesting plate in Case K in the same room is decorated with a
scene which seems to represent a poet on a funeral couch with a
wreath about his head and his lyre hanging on the wall above (fig.
147).
FIG. 148. DIPYLON VASE