Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download PDF of Quality Management in Plastics Processing 1st Edition - Ebook PDF All Chapter
Full Download PDF of Quality Management in Plastics Processing 1st Edition - Ebook PDF All Chapter
https://ebooksecure.com/download/meeting-the-challenges-of-data-
quality-management-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/energy-management-in-plastics-
processin-strategies-targets-techniques-and-tools-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-applying-quality-
management-in-healthcare-a-systems-approach-fourth-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-administration-and-
management-in-criminal-justice-a-service-quality-approach-3rd-
edition/
Biodegradability of Conventional Plastics:
Opportunities, Challenges, and Misconceptions 1st -
eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/biodegradability-of-
conventional-plastics-opportunities-challenges-and-
misconceptions-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-introduction-to-
healthcare-quality-management-second-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-introduction-to-
healthcare-quality-management-third-edition/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/introduction-to-total-quality-
management-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/innovations-in-thermochemical-
technologies-for-biofuel-processing-ebook-pdf/
Quality Management
in
Plastics Processing
This page intentionally left blank
Quality Management
in
Plastics Processing
Strategies, targets, techniques
and tools
Robin Kent
Tangram Technology Ltd
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the
publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found
at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may
be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our
understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any
information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be
mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any
injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or
operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-0-8102-082- 1
This Workbook is a companion to two for each topic. Each topic is dealt with in a
previous books entitled respectively ‘Cost single 2-page spread and most can be read
Management in Plastics Processing’ and independently of each other - this is not a
‘Energy Management in Plastics ‘cover-to-cover’ book. It should be easily
Processing’. The first of these books dealt understood and the actions recommended
briefly with quality management but only should be easily undertaken by most
as part of the general topic of cost people in the plastics processing industry.
management. Quality management is, My own introduction to quality
however a vital topic, and deserves more management was short, swift and brutal.
attention than was possible within the In 1983, whilst listening to a presentation
constraints of a book on cost management. by a major motor manufacturer on quality
Whilst the topic of quality management the presenter stated that every supplier
has been dealt with in many other books, I was expected to have a statistically
felt that the treatment in most of these fell trained quality professional on their staff.
short of what was actually needed by the I turned to my boss and said ‘Do we have
industry. The books tend to fall into two one of those?’ He looked at me and said
broad categories: emphatically ‘Yes’. I was both naïve and
• How to achieve Quality Systems confused and said ‘Who?’, whereupon he
Certification, i.e. ‘ISO 9001 in 3 easy looked back at me and said ‘You’.
lessons’ or similar. I would like to thank my friends and
• Statistical handbooks which use high- colleagues Kevin Chandler and Iain Brown
level statistics that leave most readers for their comments on the draft of this
stranded after the first paragraph. book. The errors are mine alone - Kevin
and Iain were probably right!
Neither of these types of books is written
specifically for plastics processors and Finally, I would like to dedicate this book
many plastics processors were left to our children, Emma and Matthew, they
wondering where to start on the ‘never- are our two greatest achievements in life
ending journey’ towards quality and we are intensely proud of them.
management and improvement.
As with the previous books, this book
provides a structured approach to the
techniques of quality management and Robin Kent
covers the main topics of relevance to Hitchin, 2016
plastics processors. It is a workbook for rkent@tangram.co.uk
practical use and not an academic www.tangram.co.uk
textbook. It does not cover all aspects of
the selected topics but focuses on the key
Note: Additional resources are available
quality management and technical issues
at www.tangram.co.uk/quality.html
Preface 1
This page intentionally left blank
2
Chapter 1
Introduction to quality
management
Quality management was one of the most substituted with lots of forms but little
discussed topics in manufacturing real management information or
industry in the late 20th century. Many involvement. In this book we will go back
plastics processors embarked to basics to provide the essentials for
enthusiastically on the pursuit of the ‘Holy plastics processors in an easily accessible
Grail’ of quality and many companies are format.
still trying to make sense of the confusion This chapter looks at quality management
surrounding quality. The results for many in a broad sense to put the problems in
companies have been disappointing and perspective and to allow actions to be
they are still confused about what quality effectively targeted. It is designed to
really means and how they achieve it. provide the essentials of the management
In a sense, this was because the discussion framework for quality management.
was diverted by the mechanics of Readers should not be tempted to rush
implementing formal quality systems such into the practical aspects of quality
as ISO 9001, either in the mistaken belief management without first understanding
that these would deliver quality or simply the management framework.
to conform to the requirements of
suppliers or specifications. The
implementation of statistical methods that
could actually deliver quality through
effective process control became secondary
to the filling out of forms to satisfy the
requirements of the systems.
Thirty years ago, quality management and
statistical process control were the ‘in
things’ and there was great interest and
activity in the subjects but today little has
really changed at the grass roots level.
At many of the plastics processors that I
visit, quality management still consists of
a few final inspectors and the mention of
statistical process control still draws blank
looks.
This really has to change if you are going
to be a successful plastics processor in the
future.
At many sites, the real basics of quality “Of course we believe in quality - look at
seem to have been missed and have been all the inspectors we employ.”
The destination Collis Potter Huntington (see sidebar) “Alice: Would you
was determined that the Newport News tell me, please,
One problem at many sites is that they which way I ought
shipyard would be known the world over
know that they want to have quality but to go from here?
for ‘good ships’ and this philosophy has
they really have no idea of the steps that The Cheshire Cat:
been consistent since 1886. The company
they have to take to get there. They set That depends a
is still a major supplier of ships to the US
off on the journey to quality with no real good deal on where
Navy even when other shipyards around you want to get to.
planning about where they want to go,
the world have failed - the focus on ‘good
why they want to get there (if anywhere), Alice: I don't much
ships’ has been the ethos to drive the
how they are going to go about it and care where.
company forward. How many other
how they will measure the progress they
companies could make such a statement The Cheshire Cat:
are making (if any). Then it doesn't
and live by it? How many other
Some sites set off by installing a ‘quality companies have been around since 1886? much matter which
system’ (of any flavour) in the faint hope way you go.
Focusing on profit alone may make a
that this will somehow magically deliver Alice: ...So long as I
company profitable in the short-term but,
quality, some install complex SPC get somewhere.
as too many companies have found out,
systems, some increase the numbers of The Cheshire Cat:
does not guarantee that the company will
inspectors and others simply subject the Oh, you're sure to
survive in the long-term. Focusing on
quality manager to various arcane do that, if only you
quality will not only deliver ‘good ships’
management tortures. walk long enough.”
but also sustainable long-term profits.
All of these partial and disjointed This means that companies need to see Lewis Carroll,
measures will inevitably fail. Some will quality not as a cost but as a benefit and Alice in
fail more miserably than others, but all Wonderland
to realise that improving quality can also
are eventually doomed (particularly improve profits in both the short and the
subjecting the quality manager to long-term.
management torture - as I am sure some
of the readers will know from direct The road-map
experience).
The road-map identifies the wide range
Even if a site has an operating and of skills and activities that are necessary
relatively successful quality system, to achieve quality and even this is
there is always a need to improve quality limited by space. The road-map shows
and every site needs a plan (a road-map) the type of things that you will have to do
to define where they are and where they to really achieve quality. It is not simply
want to be. Quality is often poorly about systems or SPC or any other single
defined (see Section 1.3) but still needs a thing. Specifically, it is not only about
road-map for the actions to be taken. The production. It is about the whole
figure opposite shows some of the major company and it is about a mind-set that
areas, the processes and tools used, the says ‘quality is our guiding principle’ and
benefits from using the processes and that this principle can deliver both
tools and the overall results of a properly sustainable profits and continued
functioning quality system. employment.
This is about the whole The road-map covers all areas of a
company’s operations from people (and
company their training) through product design,
A major issue is that quality is still sales/marketing and production. The
sometimes seen as a ‘bolt-on’ to the other implementation of an effective quality
operations of the company. It is seen as a management system (see Chapter 4) “We shall build
‘good thing’ for the good times but impacts every aspect of a company’s good ships here; at
optional in the bad times. The reality is a profit if we can, at
operations. This is not for the faint-
a loss if we must,
that ‘quality’ needs to permeate the hearted but the rewards are more than but always good
complete operation of the company. It is worth the effort. ships.”
not a ‘production’ issue, it is a • Tip - None of the actions in the road-
management issue for the whole Collis Potter
map are ever completed. Get used to Huntington,
company. continual improvement. Newport News
Shipbuilding
What do we want? buy are of good quality. They do not set “The race for quality
out to, or knowingly buy, poor-quality has no finish line -
In the last 30 years there has been a great so technically it is
products. Therefore, they will be
deal of discussion about the benefits of more like a death
dissatisfied if the product they buy is of
quality and why we should want it. march”.
poor quality (and they will tell their
Everybody agrees that we want quality;
friends). Customer satisfaction will Poster caption
however it is defined. from
improve if a product is of superior quality
The only issues are how we get there and to what the customer expected. www.despair.com.
what happens along the way. The road-
map (see Section 1.1) provides the Improved sales
directions and the tasks and should be Improved customer satisfaction inevitably
used to map the overall process. leads to increased sales as customers
No manager at any company wants to return, purchase more products and,
force or allow his employees to produce better still, tell their friends. The most
poor-quality goods and, equally, very few powerful and cheapest sales method of all
employees of any company deliberately is a recommendation from a satisfied
produce poor-quality goods. It is clearly in customer.
everybody’s interests to produce quality
Greater market share
products.
Satisfied customers will tell their friends
So what goes wrong along the way and
and customers, they will return (and bring
why does it seem so hard to produce
their friends) and will increase market
products that are of acceptable quality?
share.
What are the barriers and why does it “Price is
seem all so hard? Lower operating costs negotiable.
One of the problems that many companies Reducing the ‘cost of quality’ (see Chapter Quality is not.”
face is that they interpret quality as a 3) can dramatically reduce operational
Frank Price
single issue and attempt to improve
quality by fixing a single variable. In fact,
quality is affected by a range of variables
and processes. All of these variables and Better
processes must be aligned to produce a products
quality product or service. Even worse is
Improved Improved
the confusion about what quality employee customer
management really is (see Section 1.5). satisfaction satisfaction
Defining quality
The definition of quality varies:
Quality means many different things to
different people and the apparently simple What gives complete customer satisfaction.
question ‘What is quality?’ is not always Fitness for purpose and value for money.
easy to answer.
Conformance to requirements.
When most people are asked to name a
‘quality car’ they will initially nominate an Conformance to specification.
expensive car. This is due to the common Value for money = Quality for price.
confusion between ‘expensive’ and ‘quality’
and the linking of the two. When asked ‘On target with minimum variation’ (Genichi Taguchi).
how they would rate an expensive car that ‘Right First Time’ (Frank Price).
always broke down then they will
reconsider the question. When the customer returns, not the product.
The reality is that an expensive car is not When the product is what the customer wants it to be.
always a quality car. Price is a vital factor The degree of excellence of something (Oxford Dictionary).
in assessing quality because we do not
expect the same features or performance When a product or service meets or exceeds its design
from a low-cost car. Our perception of specification.
quality is inevitably linked to the cost of The whole package, not just what is in the box.
the product and we always link quality
and cost.
Quality Management
There are, in fact, a multitude of
definitions of ‘quality’ (see top right) and a Coordinated activities to direct and control an organisation with
company can choose the one that best regard to quality (ISO 9000:2005).
suits their needs. It is also important to Quality Assurance:
realise that the definition of quality is not
static, it is always transitory - the highest Part of quality management focused on providing confidence
quality product of today can be an ‘also- that quality requirements will be fulfilled (ISO 9000:2005).
ran’ product of tomorrow because of All activities and functions concerned with the attainment of
changes in competing products and prices. quality (BS 4778:1991).
As the product and process environment
The activity of providing, to all concerned, the evidence needed
changes so does the apparent quality of to establish confidence that the quality function is being
the product and process. performed adequately (Juran).
What was considered a ‘quality’ product in
Quality Control:
1995 is definitely no longer a quality
product in 2015. Part of quality management focused on fulfilling quality
• Tip - The customer’s view of quality will requirements (ISO 9000:2005).
change with time. Companies must be The operational techniques and activities that sustain the
prepared to change too. product or service quality to specified requirements. It is also
the use of such techniques and activities (BS 4778:1991).
Changing definitions
The process through which we measure actual quality
The initial definitions of quality were performance, compare it with standards, and act on the
generally framed in terms of ‘meeting difference (Juran).
specifications’, ‘meeting expectations’ and
‘customer satisfaction’. This was a Quality Improvement:
challenge in itself for many companies at Part of quality management focused on increasing the ability to
the beginning of the quality revolution. fulfil quality requirements (ISO 9000:2005).
Improvements in quality levels and Quality System:
changes in society’s expectations have led
to additions to the concept and definition The organisation and structure, responsibilities, activities,
of process and product quality. Current resources and events that together provide organised
definitions look at ‘exceeding’ expectations procedures and methods of implementation to ensure the
and additional areas such as capability of the organisation to meet quality requirements (BS
4778:1991).
sustainability and other ‘green’ issues.
Manufacturing industries.
1980 - 2000
The industrial revolution changed all industries The rise of the ‘quality
management systems’
systems
Where are you starting from? Read the descriptions in the column cells If you don’t know
and select the cell that is closest to the where you are
Throughout this Workbook there are self- starting out from
current situation in your company.
assessment charts designed to help assess then it is unlikely
the current position in a variety of areas. It is unlikely that the description in the that you will end up
cell will fully describe a specific situation where you want to
The charts are easy to complete but we
but choose the cell that has the most get to!
suggest copying the relevant pages before
appropriate description. If in doubt score
completing the forms.
lower rather than higher. This will give a
Understanding the current situation score ranging from 0 to 4, mark this at the
provides the basis for an improvement base of the column. This is a team
strategy and many of the basic actions effort!
After all the columns have been scored,
necessary for successful implementation.
transfer the scores to the radar chart for Completing the
the relevant columns/axes. This gives a chart on your own
Completing the chart is not
rapid visual assessment of the current
Each chart has several columns covering recommended. It is
situation for the specific topic. much better to
various aspects of the main topic.
either complete the
chart as a group -
you will be amazed
Quality management at the divergence
of opinions - or to
get several people
Management in the company to
complete the chart
commitment separately and
4 then to compare
the results.
Management has Quality Full cost of quality Formal quality SPC used on Good knowledge
moderate improvement is an known but management many processes & use of quality
commitment. important knowledge is system in place but only if tools in analysis &
Majority of business goal. restricted. with full external customer problem solving.
requirements are Improvement Upper verification of requirement.
3 in place but techniques only management not system. SPC sometimes
enforcement is used when aware of benefits No major non- used for tooling &
sporadic. concerns are of quality conformances process
present & visible. management. found in last year. equipment
acceptance.
Management has Quality Cost of prevention Formal quality SPC used on Some knowledge
low commitment & improvement is a & appraisal known management some processes of quality tools &
only really minor goal. from accounts. system in place but only if often used for
involved when Improvement Failure costs with full external customer analysis.
problems occur. techniques known vaguely verification of requirement. Problems often
2 Basic sometimes used but with no system. SPC not used for solved but key
requirements are when concerns accuracy. Significant major tooling & process concerns remain
in place but not are present & non- equipment unsolved &
enforced. visible. conformances acceptance. reappear.
found in last year.
Management not Quality Appraisal costs Formal quality SPC known but Little knowledge
committed. improvement is known from management not considered for of quality tools &
Some aspects of not seen as a accounts but system in place use. rarely used.
quality are in goal. concept of but no external When used they
place due to Improvement prevention & verification of are not fully
1 middle techniques not failure costs system. followed through
management used even when unknown & no to completion.
dedication but few concerns are data available. Same concerns
resources present & visible. return time &
available. again.
Management not Quality Cost of quality No formal quality SPC not No knowledge or
committed. improvement is unknown & all management considered or use of quality
No quality policy, not seen as a quality operations system in place. used. tools.
no resources, no goal. are seen as
training & no Getting the overhead for the
0 delegated product out the business.
authority. door is the only
goal.
Score
Financial management
Identifying
4
Project
2 Exploiting
funding
Management
Human
information
resources
systems
Areas of
disagreement may
show that there is
something
happening at the
site that is not well
Appraisal known, i.e. the
methods Finance function is
actually keeping
records but is not
Use the scoring chart to assess where you are in financial management telling the
Production function
The numbers from the scoring chart can be transferred to the radar chart for a quick visual that they are doing
assessment of where you are in the basics of financial management. so.
Regular quality Quality staff are Promising Discounting Quality manager Projects compete
audits by required to proposals are methods using working well with for capital along
experienced staff comment on all presented to organisation's accounts/finance with other
to identify quality projects. decision-makers specified discount department to business
improvement Quality but insufficient rates. present well- opportunities, but
3 opportunities likely improvement information (e.g. argued cases to have to meet more
to yield largest projects are sensitivity or risk decision makers. stringent
savings. sometimes analysis) results in requirements for
considered in delays or return on
terms of total cost rejections. investment.
of quality.
Sporadic quality Quality staff Adequate Undiscounted Occasional Quality projects
audits used to notified of all management appraisal proposals to not formally
identify quality proposals that information methods, e.g. decision makers considered for
improvement affect quality. available, but not gross return on by quality funding from
opportunities & Proposals for in the correct capital. managers with capital budget,
2 potential savings quality format or easily limited success & except when very
but few records improvements are accessed in only marginal short-term returns
kept. at risk when support of quality interest from are evident.
capital is scarce. improvement decision makers.
proposals.
Informal quality Quality staff use Insufficient Simple payback Responsibility Funding only
surveys conducted informal contacts information to criteria are unclear & those available from
by staff with to identify projects demonstrate applied. involved lack time, revenue on low-
checklists to where quality can whether previous No account taken expertise & risk projects with
identify quality be improved at investment in of lifetime of the resources to paybacks of less
1 improvement marginal cost. quality investment. identify projects & than one year.
opportunities. improvement has prepare proposals.
been worthwhile.
Score x x x x x x
Technical management
Process capability
4
Operational Plant
targets 2 replacement
Records Maintenance
Operators often
know how to
improve quality by
changing
operational
methods. Despite
this, their
Operational knowledge is
routinely ignored in
knowledge favour of the less
relevant knowledge
of someone in an
Use the scoring chart to assess where you are in technical management office.
The numbers from the scoring chart can be transferred to the radar chart for a quick visual An opportunity lost
assessment of where you are in the basics of technical management. and a huge pity.
Capability of all Plant chosen is Maintenance is Staff know how Detailed capability Targets set using
existing processes the most based on needs, their actions affect studies & control historical
known & appropriate for with condition quality & take charts (or performance with
improvement application. appraisal used for positive steps to equivalent) improvement
plans in place. Capability & all equipment improve quality. available for all plans in place for
4 Process capability consistency are affecting quality. Staff have processes & all products.
used as part of major factors in Results acted targeted training in products. Monitored for
sales process. selection. upon. quality issues. Detailed actual cost of
schedules of quality.
quality processes
& controls.
Capability of major Plant chosen is Regular condition Staff are aware of Some capability Targets set using
processes known appropriate for surveys carried how they affect studies & control historical
but no application with out on equipment quality & take charts (or performance with
improvement capability affecting quality. good equivalent) for no improvement
plans in place. considered. Action undertaken housekeeping some processes & plans in place.
3 Process capability Capability is not a for most defects measures to products. Monitored for
not used as part of major factor in identified. maintain quality. Some schedules actual cost of
sales process. purchase decision. Training on a of quality quality.
regular basis. processes &
controls.
Capability of very Plant selected to Condition surveys Most good Few capability Some targets set
few processes is be fit for purpose. carried out housekeeping studies & control but against
known. Little consideration regularly on all practices are charts (or unrealistic
No plans in place of capability & equipment adhered to in an equivalent) budgets.
to determine assumed to be affecting quality. attempt to available. Little control via
2 capability & no provided by Remedial work maintain quality. Few schedules of financial
improvement supplier. constrained by Occasional quality quality processes procedures to
plans in place. budgets. training received & controls. monitor the cost of
but primarily as quality.
part of operational
training.
Process capability Process capability Condition surveys Quality techniques No capability Few targets set.
not known for any & machine data on carried out are only adopted studies & control Those that are set
processes. plant rarely occasionally, where they can be charts (or are by default
Process capability obtained as part of prompted by plant easily equivalent) for any through budget-
sometimes less selection process. failure or safety accommodated processes or setting procedures
1 than required for Initial price is the considerations. within traditional products. that nobody
existing products. major factor in Remedial work working practices. Minimal or poor- understands.
decision. only carried out on quality control
major defects. records.
Score x x x x x x
Market Quality
awareness 2 awareness
1
What's worse:
Training someone
0 and risking they
might leave, or
NOT training
someone and
having them stay?
Training Reporting
Performance
review
Use the scoring chart to assess where you are in awareness & information If you think training
is expensive then
The numbers from the scoring chart can be transferred to the radar chart for a quick visual consider the cost of
assessment of where you are in the basics of awareness and information. ignorance.
Lists of Quality Wide reporting of Progress regularly Training properly Company keeps
responsibilities & performance current status reviewed. resourced for all up to date with all
their assignment regularly given to compared with Performance staff. technical
exist & are all staff. best practice, on compared against Active quality developments by
comprehensive & Full use made of regular basis & internal & external library. monitoring of trade
4 regularly reviewed. publicity. geared at a range benchmarks. All staff have journals, literature
All staff have All methods used of audiences. Ideas actively access to & other sources on
responsibilities. to promote new Full support to sought. information on issues affecting
measures for public statements. quality techniques quality.
improving quality. & tools.
Lists of Quality status Current status Frequent quality Continuous Regular studies
responsibilities & presented to all reports issued reviews using training & carried out on
their assignment staff at least annually to performance & development for trade journals,
exist for key annually. shareholders & cost data. all staff. literature & other
quality staff & all Occasional but staff. Analysis is regular, All staff are aware sources to assess
3 departments. widespread Impartial reporting wide-ranging but of & have access current
publicity to of performance to ritualistic. to a quality library. developments
promote quality staff & impacting on
improvements. departments on a quality.
regular basis.
Some staff & Quality Occasional issue Occasional Staff development Trade journals,
departments have performance of quality status technical quality & training is a literature & other
written presented to staff reports. reviews. personal sources
responsibilities. on a regular basis. Concentrates on Regular cost responsibility. occasionally
Occasional use of bad news. checks with Occasional scanned for
2 publicity to exception initiatives to train information on the
promote quality reporting. staff in quality. latest
improvements. Analysis of limited developments in
scope. techniques &
tools.
Unwritten set of Quality Reports only Quality review Few staff have Trade journals,
responsibility performance issued if prompted activity based knowledge of literature & other
assignments. occasionally by a quality failure. simply on quality techniques sources rarely
reported & known Most reports will requirements of & tools. studied for quality
to very few staff. contain only bad quality systems Little training in implications of
1 Quality news. standards. quality for staff. production.
improvement
measures are
rarely promoted.
No evidence of No staff have No reporting. No monitoring Staff have little Quality is not a
assignment of explicit activity to underpin knowledge of consideration
quality tasks & responsibilities or review processes. quality techniques when keeping up
duties. duties. & tools. to date on
No attempt to products or
0 inform staff of technology.
techniques &
benefits of quality
improvements.
Score x x x x x x
• Quality is broader than simply ‘product’ geared and the savings go straight to the
quality. It is about the totality of the bottom line.
service that the company provides • The payback time for projects to improve
(including the product). quality and reduce the cost of quality is
• The journey to ‘quality’ is not static - very short.
Quality is not a destination, it is a state of • Reducing the cost of quality is better
mind. than increasing sales.
• Quality management needs a ‘road map’ • Reducing the cost of quality can
to keep control of all the areas that need to dramatically improve profits.
be addressed.
• Reducing the cost of quality is low-risk.
• Quality management can deliver a
• Performance indicators can be either for
multitude of benefits both inside and
internal or external. They are very
outside a company.
different.
• Quality is not delivered simply by
• Internal indicators are mainly data
installing a quality system. It needs
based and are only relevant for internal
organisation, systems, tools and the right
use.
culture.
• External indicators are mainly
• Quality can be defined in many ways but
perception based and can be relevant for
the real definition is in the mind of the
internal or external use.
customer.
• Understanding and matching external
• Customers are always concerned with
indicators to internal performance is
the quality of a product or service.
critical.
• The methods of achieving quality have
• Performance indicators need to be
changed with time and will continue to
chosen with care.
change. The one constant is the benefit it
brings to a company. • Performance indicators need to be
capable of being improved by the people
• Quality management is not simply about
responsible, statistically stable and
quality control, it is about quality
relevant to the improvements needed.
assurance, quality control and quality
improvement.
• Without quality improvement the full
benefits of quality management will not be
achieved.
• Quality is not simply a production
issues, it is an issue for the complete
company.
• The building blocks for quality
(management commitment, quality tools,
quality systems and quality improvement)
all need to be in place to achieve quality
management.
• Quality costs are really the ‘cost of poor
quality’.
• The actual ‘cost of quality’ for most
plastics processors is approximately 20%
of sales. This is far higher than the profit
margin for most processors.
• It is possible to reduce the actual ‘cost of
quality’ to approximately 10% of sales and
considerably increase profits for most
plastics processors.
• Reducing the cost of quality is highly
Quality management is the same as any products. If this happens then clearly the
other type of management and requires organisational structure and concepts are
appropriate organisation to carry out wrong, the allocation of responsibilities is
effectively. This chapter reviews how a wrong and the company needs to revisit
company can be organised to improve both. We look at how companies can get
quality management and to manage the started in effective quality management
essential improvement process. This is not and some of the organisational
the same as discussing ‘quality arrangements that are necessary and
management systems’, these are specified available for improving quality.
in ISO 9001 which sets out the In the words of Juran, “Quality is
international requirements for quality improved project by project” and therefore
management systems and ISO 9001 is we also look at the essentials of quality
covered in depth in Chapter 4. improvement projects, how these can be
Instead, this chapter deals with the found, the organisation necessary to carry
organisational aspects of quality and tries them out and how to deliver improved
to answer the questions: quality.
• How do you organise your company for
effective quality management?
• How can the essential process of quality
improvement be organised and
stimulated?
• How do you find, stimulate and complete
quality improvement projects?
Quality can only be monitored and
improved within the organisational
structure of a company and many
companies get this fundamentally wrong.
If this is in any doubt then ask yourself
‘Who gets yelled at when quality falls or
when we have a quality problem?’. If it is
the Quality Manager then management
fundamentally misunderstands whose job
it is to produce quality products, i.e. the
Production Manager - the Quality
Manager is there to try to improve quality “The bitterness of poor quality lingers long
and keep the score, he cannot be held after the sweetness of cheap price is
responsible for the actions of the forgotten.”
Production Department if it makes faulty
Anon
Management commitment have any structure at all for quality Managers are there
improvement (see Section 2.5). This is to manage
The key element to making quality improvement.
simply poor planning for the future of
management work is top management
the company and indicates a The one question
commitment. Without this, then nothing
management weakness. Management you have to answer
else will work. Employee engagement and
needs to understand that quality to at the end of
assistance is vital but without top each year is - what
improvement is a financial benefit to the
management commitment then nothing have you
company and an essential part of quality
else will work. If the top management is improved?
management.
not committed then you might as well use
this book to prop up a desk or hold a door • Motivation, awareness and teamwork -
open. Do not even try to start work until the top management sets the scene for
top management has made a firm and quality management and the culture of
irrevocable commitment to quality the company. They need to encourage
management. quality improvement, raise awareness of
the real affects of poor quality and
The role of management encourage teamwork both inside
What does management need to provide to departments (quality circles) and across
departmental boundaries (quality
show commitment and how can they do it
effectively? Some of the elements are: improvement teams). This needs
motivation and awareness at all levels of
• Quality policy - the management sets the the company (particularly for the top
tone of the process by producing the management).
company quality policy. This is not an
• Creating the quality climate - above all,
exercise in ‘copying and pasting’ a
standard policy. It should be self- top management needs to create a
generated and really be the policy of the quality climate where quality is seen as
company. The policy should be generated the issue that will decide if the company
is in business next year or not. Poor
by the top management and not by the
profits can stop expansion and growth,
quality department - let them think
poor quality will kill the company. Only You get what you
about it and express it in their own
top management can create this climate. measure.
words.
• Allocation of resources - any process that
is starved of resources will inevitably fail
and quality management is no exception. Quality control
Quality management, particularly the
improvement process, needs resources.
In time, these can be internally
Ho
ldi
ug
ins
i ng
al i t
Pareto analysis
quality assurance and control (see
pl a
mp
ty
ali
ve
in place.
Project by project
• Tip - If the Quality Manager reports to
the Production Director then it is the
equivalent to expecting the fox to guard Quality improvement is an essential part of quality
the henhouse. management
• Quality improvement - whilst most Quality control and planning are not enough. Quality
companies have structures (good or bad) improvement is needed to stay in business. Without continuous
for quality assurance and control, few improvement a company is doomed to eventual failure.
Production Accounting
Function: Function:
Produce products from agreed materials with Control all financial aspects of company to achieve
agreed processes and procedures. profitable operations.
Quality management responsibilities: Quality management responsibilities:
Produce product to specification. Manage company finances to ensure profitable
operation.
Maintain production schedule to meet customer
requirements. Produce reports, budgets and data for operational
control and annual accounts for financial
Implement preventive and corrective action as
compliance.
required.
Provide clear, accurate and timely invoices and
Communicate with other functions on any problem
accounts for customers.
affecting production or the product.
Pay supplier invoices in clear, accurate and timely
Take part in Design Reviews to assess production
manner.
capability.
Provide accounting information for cost of quality
Manage production area quality improvement
reporting.
actions.
Provide accounting information for process
improvement assessment.
Chain of command
4
3
Quality is not the
enemy of
Statistical Quality production; it is an
awareness 2 assurance essential support
function to check
that production is
1 performing to the
required standards.
Process
Quality
improvement
control
cycles
Staff
involvement Quality is all about
statistics and risk.
Every site needs a
Use the scoring chart to assess where you are in quality organisation good awareness of
statistics to operate
The numbers from the scoring chart can be transferred to the radar chart for a quick visual effective quality
assessment of where you are in terms of quality organisation. systems.
Documented chain Quality systems Quality control is Poor staff Process Poor level of
of command for maintained by seen as the involvement in improvement statistical
quality. very few staff as 'enemy' by quality. cycles rarely used awareness in most
Quality manager part of on-going production. Quality is the to improve staff.
in place but process. Production staff 'responsibility' of products & No specialist
1 reports to Other staff do not sometimes try to the Quality processes even statistical
Production feel that quality get faulty products Department & not after customer or knowledge
Manager. systems are part past inspectors & other staff. market pressure. available to site.
of their duties. out the door.
Score x x x x x x
Customers/suppliers
A key issue for quality management is
how we organise companies (see Section
2.7). The ‘departmental’ organisation
model does not reflect the real ‘process’
orientation of actual companies and does
not recognise that the ‘tribes’ of the
company can become more important than
the company itself, i.e. the people see
themselves as part of the production
department rather than as part of the
company. The process model of a company
accepts this and recognises the customers
can be internal as well as external.
The old model of a company saw a set of
suppliers sending raw materials to the
company, the company doing Suppliers and customers
‘work’ (adding value) and then sending the The ‘old’ model had a set of suppliers and a final customer. The
product to the customer. The new model ‘new’ model has ‘internal’ suppliers and ‘internal’ customers. The
sees external suppliers sending raw person you give the output of your process to is your customer
materials to the company and then a and you are their supplier - you need to work together.
En vez de: