Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Visualizing Human Biology 5Th Edition Visualizing Series 5Th Edition PDF Full Chapter PDF
Visualizing Human Biology 5Th Edition Visualizing Series 5Th Edition PDF Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmass.com/product/human-anatomy-5th-edition-ebook-
pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/biology-concept-and-
investigation-5th-5th-edition-marielle-hoefnagels/
https://ebookmass.com/product/gifts-glamping-glocks-a-camper-
criminals-cozy-mystery-series-book-29-tonya-kappes/
https://ebookmass.com/product/cardiology-an-integrated-approach-
human-organ-systems-dec-29-2017_007179154x_mcgraw-hill-1st-
edition-elmoselhi/
Neuromechanics of Human Movement 5th Edition, (Ebook
PDF)
https://ebookmass.com/product/neuromechanics-of-human-
movement-5th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/ebook-pdf-international-human-
resource-management-5th-edition/
https://ebookmass.com/product/human-genetics-5th-edition-gangane/
https://ebookmass.com/product/fundamentals-of-human-resource-
management-5th-edition-whats-new-in-management-5th-edition-ebook-
pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/trapped-brides-of-the-kindred-
book-29-faith-anderson/
Special Thanks
I am extremely grateful to the many members of the editorial and production staff at John Wiley
and Sons who guided us through the challenging steps of developing this text. Their tireless enthu-
siasm, professional assistance, and endless patience smoothed the path as I found my way. I thank
in particular Alan Halfen, Senior Editor, who expertly launched and directed the revision; Melissa
Edwards Whelan, Development Editor, for coordinating the development and revision process;
Kristine Ruff, Market Development Manager, for a superior marketing effort, and MaryAlice Skid-
more and Alden Ferrar, Editorial Assistants, for their constant attention to detail. I also thank Trish
McFadden, Senior Production Editor, and Jeanine Furino of Furino Production for expertly help-
ing me through the production process. I thank Mary Ann Price, Photo Editor, for her unflagging,
always swift work in researching and obtaining many of our text images. I thank Wendy Lai for the
stunning new cover. Thank you to Petra Recter, Vice President and Director for providing guidance
and support to the rest of the team throughout the revision.
Dedication
This edition is dedicated to Betty Ireland, whose legacy of strength, determination, and intellectual
curiosity I now strive to carry forward with loving support from my husband Jeff, and my sons Greg
and Marc.
About the Author
Aloha! I was born and raised on the East Coast of the US, where I began my education at Lehigh
University. I went on to graduate with a BS and MS from the University of Alabama, and then
later obtained my PhD from Iowa State. I spent many years on Maui, where I taught, learned to
surf and competed in triathlons. My work experience has been broad, including both applied
and basic research in genetics, cell biology, and human physiology. I have taught at colleges
(Iowa State University, University of Hawaii, Maui, and Arkansas State University) as well as
both private and public high schools. Like all professors I have a long list of societies and
awards to my name; however I prefer to focus on teaching. My favorite teaching experiences
revolve around making a difficult concept accessible to a struggling student. When that light
shines from the student’s eyes, I know I have done my job! This book is an extension of those
moments. I have included tested and proven ways to make this material both interesting and
memorable. When I am not teaching, I can be found riding my bike, stand up paddling, or
hanging out with my husband Jeff and my grown sons, Greg and Marc.
Brief Contents
PREFACE iii 15 Nutrition: You Are What You Eat 322
9 Immunity and the Lymphatic System 173 A PPE NDIX B Measurements B-1
1.1 Living Organisms Display Nine Specific Characteristics 2 6.1 The Skeletomuscular System Is Multifunctional and
1.2 Human Biology Is Structured and Logical 4 Dynamic 98
1.3 Scientists Approach Questions Using the Scientific 6.2 Bone Is Strong and Light Tissue 100
Method 9 6.3 The Skeleton Holds It All Together 105
1.4 Scientific Findings Often Lead to Ethical Dilemmas 13 6.4 Skeletal Muscles Exercise Power 114
6.5 Whole-Muscle Contractions Require Energy 120
2 Where Do We Come from and
Where Do We Fit? 16 7 The Nervous System 127
2.1 What Are the Origins of Modern Humans? 17 7.1 The Nervous System Is Categorized by Structure and
2.2 What Does the Human Body Have in Common Function 128
with the World Around It? 23 7.2 Neurons Work Through Action Potentials 132
2.3 We Reflect Our Environment: We Have a Habitat 7.3 The Meninges Protect the Brain’s Delicate Structures 139
and a Niche 29 7.4 The Functions of the Brain and Spinal Cord Are
Related 145
3 Everyday Chemistry of Life 33
7.5 The Peripheral Nervous System Extends the
Central Nervous System 150
3.1 Life Has a Unique Chemistry 34
3.2 Water Is Life’s Essential Chemical 41 8 The Special Senses 156
3.3 Carbohydrates, Lipids, and Proteins Provide Form and
Function 43 8.1 The Special Senses Tell Us About Our Environment 157
3.4 Nucleic Acids Carry Information and Direct Protein 8.2 Vision Is Our Most Acute Sense 163
Formation 50 8.3 The Special Senses Are Our Connection to the Outside
World 169
5 Tissues 77
9.4 The Lymphatic System Comprises Our Third Line of
Defense 184
9.5 Specific Immunity Targets Pathogens 189
5.1 Some Tissues Provide Covering, Protection, and
9.6 Immunity Can Be Acquired Actively or Passively 195
Support 78
5.2 Other Tissues Provide Movement, Heat, and
Integration 84 10 Infectious Disease and
5.3 Organization Increases with Organs, Organ Systems, Epidemiology 200
and the Organism 88
5.4 Scientists Use a Road Map to the Human Body 92 10.1 The Study of Epidemics Is Global in Scope 201
10.2 Bacteria Are Single-Celled Wonders That Can Cause
Disease 205
10.3 Viruses Can Reproduce and Kill, but They Are Not Alive 211
10.4 AIDS and HIV Attack the Immune System 217
10.5 Other Pathogens Carry Other Dangers 222
x CON T E N TS
13 The Cardiovascular System 268 19.1 Survival of the Species Depends on Gamete
Formation 408
13.1 The Heart Ensures Continual, 24/7 Nutrient Delivery 269
19.2 The Male Reproductive System Produces, Stores,
13.2 Blood Transport Involves Miles of Sophisticated
and Delivers Sperm 410
Plumbing 278
19.3 The Female Reproductive System Produces and
13.3 Cardiovascular Disorders Have Life-Threatening
Nourishes Eggs 417
Consequences 281
19.4 Human Reproductive Cycles Are Controlled By
13.4 Blood Consists of Plasma and Formed Elements 285
Hormones 422
13.5 Red Blood Cells and Platelets Help Maintain
19.5 There Are Many Birth Control Choices 428
Homeostasis 290
19.6 Sexual Contact Carries a Danger: Sexually Transmitted
Diseases 435
14 The Respiratory System: Movement
of Air 297 20 Pregnancy: Development from
14.1 The Respiratory System Has an Upper And Lower Tract 298
Conception to Newborn 439
14.2 The Lower Respiratory Tract Exchanges Gases 302
20.1 Days 1 Through 14 Include Fertilization and
14.3 Air Is Moved Into and Out of the Respiratory System 308
Implantation 440
14.4 Respiration Relies on the Cardiovascular System 311
20.2 The Embryonic Stage Is Marked by Differentiation
14.5 Respiratory Health Is Critical to Survival 315
and Morphogenesis 446
20.3 Fetal Development Is a Stage of Rapid Organ Growth 452
15 Nutrition: You Are What You Eat 322 20.4 Labor Initiates the End of Pregnancy 457
17.1 The Kidneys Are the Core of the Urinary System 366 GLOSSARY GL-1
17.2 Urine Is Made, Transported, and Stored 369
17.3 The Urinary System Maintains the Body’s Fluid and INDEX I-1
Solute Balance 375
17.4 Life-Threatening Diseases Affect the Urinary System 378
CONT ENTS xi
What Is Life?
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1
2 CHA PT E R 1 What Is Life?
Respond to external stimuli Adapt to the environment Contain materials found only in living organisms
Joel Sartore / NG
Image Collection
Science Source
Dr. Tim Evans /
Masterfile
Collection
Richard Lord /
Getty Images
cell The smallest unit of life, contained in a membrane or cell wall. organ system A group of organs that perform a broad biological function,
tissue A cohesive group of similar cells performing a specific function. such as respiration or reproduction.
organ A structure composed of more than one tissue having one or more
specific functions.
Living Organisms Display Nine Specific Characteristics 3
along with other organisms, can function properly only if they stay Homeostasis Helps an Organism Stay Alive
within narrow ranges of temperature and chemistry. Homeosta-
sis allows you to respond to changes in your internal environment Homeostasis helps an organism stay alive, often through the use
by modifying some aspect of your behavior, either consciously or of feedback systems, or loops, as shown in Figure 1.1. The most
unconsciously. When you are chilled, you consciously look for ways common type of feedback system in the human is negative feed-
to warm yourself. This morning, you clothed yourself in an attempt back. Negative feedback systems operate to reduce or eliminate
to remain warm. If your clothing was not enough, your body would the changes detected by the stimulus receptor. Negative feed-
begin to shiver to generate internal heat through chemical reactions. back prevents you from breathing fast enough to pass out or from
Blood vessels near the surface of your skin would constrict and carry drinking so much water that your blood chemistry becomes dan-
less blood, thereby reducing heat loss through radiation. These gerously unbalanced. Positive feedback systems are rare in the
changes are attempts to maintain homeostasis. Each response to the body and include childbirth and blood clotting. The response in a
chill is designed to remove or negate that feeling, in a typical nega- positive feedback system serves to amplify the original stimulus.
tive feedback loop. (See Health, Wellness, and Disease: Homeostasis Feedback is so important that we will return to it when we discuss
Is a Way of Life!) each organ system.
Receptors
that monitor the environment
and report perceived
changes by sending
Effectors
that carry out the response
from the control center
bringing about a change.
groups of simpler units from the previous level, arranged to perform function combine to form organ systems. For example, the respiratory
a specific function. The smallest particles that usually matter in biol- system includes organs that work together to exchange gas between
ogy are atoms, as shown in Figure 1.2. An atom is defined as the cells and the atmosphere; organs in the skeletal system support the
smallest unit of an element that has the properties of that element. body and protect the soft internal organs. A suite of organ systems
Atoms combine to form molecules−larger units that can have entirely combine to form the human organism. Notice that each layer of com-
different properties than the atoms they contain. You already know plexity involves a group of related units from the preceding layer. This
some of the molecules we will discuss, such as water, glucose, and type of hierarchy is found throughout biology and the natural world.
DNA. Molecules combine to form cells, which are the smallest unit of Taking a global view of the organization found in the natural
life. We will take a closer look at cells in Chapter 4. Groups of similar world, we see that the concept of hierarchy does not stop at the indi-
cells with similar function combine to form tissues. vidual. The individual human organism lives in groups of humans
The human body has four major tissue types: muscular, nervous, called populations, as shown in Figure 1.3. Beyond populations are
epithelial, and connective. Tissues working together form organs, such larger and more inclusive groups called communities, ecosystems,
as the kidney, stomach, liver, and heart. Organs with the same general biomes and the biosphere.
FIGURE 1.2 Hierarchy of organization of life In the hierarchy of biology, each level gains in complex-
ity, and demonstrates new properties. These emergent properties arise as smaller units interact, with
consequences unattainable by the previous level.
3 TISSUE LEVEL
(myocardium)
Atoms (carbon,
hydrogen, oxygen
and nitrogen are Molecule (DNA)
the most common
elements in 4 ORGAN LEVEL
biological 5 ORGAN SYSTEM (heart)
organisms) LEVEL (Cardiovascular
system)
6 ORGANISM LEVEL
Homo sapiens
FIGURE 1.3 Hierarchy of life beyond the individual Living organisms are grouped beyond the indi-
vidual, to include populations, communities, ecosystems, and the all-inclusive biosphere.
James L. Stanfield / NG Image Collection
e. Biosphere
Finally, all Earth’s biomes comprise the biosphere.
Human Biology Is Structured and Logical 7
Biological Classification Is Logical Each kingdom is further classified, based on similar characteris-
tics, into divisions that get ever more narrow: phylum, class, order,
Biology tries to make sense of myriad observations of the biosphere family, genus, and species. Each category defines the organisms
by classifying organisms into groups with similar characteristics. more tightly, resulting in a hierarchy of similarity. The final category,
The branch of science that deals with this organizational scheme is species, implies reproductive isolation, meaning (with very few excep-
called taxonomy. One of the best-accepted taxonomic schemes tions) that members of a particular species can produce viable and
starts from the most inclusive, with three domains and six kingdoms fertile offspring only if they breed with each other.
(see Figure 1.4). The domain Eukarya includes organisms whose Taxonomists capitalize the first letter of all classification terms
cells contain nuclei and internal membranes. The four kingdoms in except species (Homo sapiens). The species name is always preceded
Eukarya are Animalia (the animals), Plantae (the plants), Fungi (the by the entire genus name, unless you have just mentioned the genus;
fungi), and Protista (the one-celled organisms that possess nuclei). then you can abbreviate it: “In regard to Homo sapiens, we must note
The two remaining kingdoms are the prokaryotic Eubacteria and that H. sapiens . . .” Genus and species names are either underlined or
Archaebacteria (the bacteria and other one-celled organisms without written in italics, as shown in Figure 1.5.
nuclei). It is worth noting that unlike bacteria, viruses are not classi- Each successive category refines the characteristics of “human”
fied as living−see I Wonder… Are Viruses Considered Living Organisms? to the point where only humans are classified in the final category,
on the next page. Homo sapiens. Despite the amazingly complex and pervasive cultural
FIGURE 1.4 Domains and kingdoms There are three Domains into which all living organisms are
classified.
Think Critically
Earliest Organisms
This figure indicates that there are basic similarities between fungi and
animals, as well as at least one major difference. What characteristic
might that branch indicate? Make a table of the similarities and differ-
ences between fungi and animals, choose the difference that you believe
to be most important, and defend that choice.
From left to right: NIAID / CDC / Science Source; T. Stevens & P. McKinley, PNNL / Science Source; Dr. Richard Kessel / Getty Images;
Beverly Joubert / NG Image Collection; Norbert Rosing / NG Image Collection; Raymond Gehman / NG Image Collection
taxonomy The study of classification, based on structural similarities and species A precise taxonomic classification, consisting of organisms that
common ancestry. can breed and produce offspring capable of breeding.
kingdom A high-level taxonomic classification. viable Capable of remaining alive.
8 CHA PT E R 1 What Is Life?
I Wonder . . .
differences that exist between populations of humans, we are all the backbone of inheritance, evolution, and biotechnology. Cellu-
members of the same species. lar structure and function is the topic of Chapter 4. Understanding
It is human nature to group similar ideas, processes, and organ- how organelles function and what differentiates cell types underlies
isms to make sense of the seemingly complex world in which we live. every process we will study. As you go through the physiology pre-
Just as there are characteristics that can be identified as common to sented in this book, the basic underlying process will be indicated.
all life forms in the domain Eukarya, there are basic processes that This will make it easier for you to understand the larger, more com-
can be identified as common to the study of human physiology. There plicated processes by allowing you to relate them to their most basic
are arguably five basic processes on which human physiology hinges: components.
osmosis and diffusion, energy transfer and storage, protein function-
ing, DNA actions, and cellular structure and function.
Osmosis and diffusion appear in Chapter 4. These processes are Concept Check
integral in the respiratory, digestive, urinary, and nervous systems.
Energy transfer and storage are all about chemical bonds. The flow
1. How do atoms relate to the study of life?
of energy through the biological world, introduced in Chapters 2 and
2. What is the largest taxonomic group that apes and humans share? What is
3, relies on this simple process. Humans are composed of both struc-
the smallest taxonomic group they share?
tural and functional proteins, introduced in Chapter 3. Structural
proteins protect and maintain organ shape, hold our skin in place, 3. What can you discover about an organism by comparing its full taxonomic
classification to that of a human?
and provide flexibility to bone. Functional proteins are the basis of
digestion, oxygen transport, muscle contraction, immunology, endo- 4. How will mastering protein functioning help in understanding other
crinology, and even reproduction. DNA is introduced in Chapter 3 processes?
and discussed in greater detail in Chapter 21. Molecular biology is
PROCESS DIAGRAM FIGURE 1.6 The scientific method The scientific method is rooted in logic. If we can show that our
hypothesis does not apply to even one situation, then our hypothesis is wrong. After we analyze the data
and draw conclusions, we may have to throw out our hypothesis or conclude that it applies to a more
limited range of circumstances.
OBSERVE OBSERVE
Recognize problem
or unanswered question.
HYPOTHESIZE
Develop hypothesis
to explain problem. HYPOTHESIZE
Rooster crow
causes sunrise
Make predictions based on hypothesis.
EXPERIMENT
Design and perform
experiment to test hypothesis.
Sun rise
10
(days)
Analyze and interpret data
to reach conclusions.
0 Alive Dead
Does hypothesis predict reality? rooster rooster
COMMUNICATE
The sun rises even
Share new knowledge if no rooster crows.
with other scientists.
Let’s take an example from human biology to show the process without the firming agent, and the experimental group will get Brand
of testing a hypothesis. Have you seen those hand lotions that claim X with the firming agent. After using the cream for one month, we
to be “skin firming”? Sounds great, but how would we test this claim? will repeat the skin-fold measurements and analyze our data, look-
Under the scientific method, we consider the marketing claim to ing for changes in skin tautness between the two groups as evidence
be the observation, so we must develop a testable hypothesis from for either accepting or refuting the hypothesis. If the experimental
the observation: “Using this hand cream for one month will cause group displays an increase in tautness that would occur by chance
measurable tightening of the skin on the back of the hand.” Now we in less than 1 experiment in 20, the change is said to have statisti-
restate the hypothesis as an “if, then” statement: “If the cream does cal significance, and the hypothesis is supported: The cream does
firm the skin, then using the cream on the back of the hand for one tighten the skin.
month will reduce the skin-fold measurement.” This is a testable It is important to note that any conclusions drawn from a scien-
statement that lends itself to controlled experimentation. First, we tific experiment must be supported by the data. If the results of your
will assess each person’s skin tautness by measuring the amount experiment could have happened by chance, you cannot say that the
of skin that can be pulled up on the back of the hand. Then we will results were due to the experimental design. In that case, a new exper-
randomly divide the participants into two groups: a control group iment must be designed and run.
and an experimental group. We will treat each group in an identical Because biologists cannot always control all factors, or variables,
manner, except that the control group will use Brand X hand cream that might affect the outcome, they often use observation as a form of
experimentation. If you were interested in the effects of mercury on We hear that fossil fuels are warming the globe. We see countless
the human brain, it would not be ethical to dose people with mercury, new technologies in the field of consumer electronics. In medicine,
but you could perform an observational study. You could measure we hear about a steady stream of new surgeries and wonder drugs.
blood levels of mercury, or you could ask your research participants We are told of many ways in which humans are causing the loss of
about past diet. (Food, especially fish, is the major source of mercury rain forests, coral reefs, natural forests, and plains, as well as the
exposure.) Then you would use statistical tests to look for a relation- animals that live there. We worry about the causes of animal extinc-
ship between mercury exposure and intelligence. Finally, you could tion (see Ethics and Issues: Why Should Endangered Species Matter
try to confirm or refute your results with controlled experiments in to Me? for a discussion of this). About the only way to wade through
lab animals. Does mercury make rats faster or slower at negotiating a the morass of information in the media is to understand and use
maze (a standard test for rat intelligence)? Observational studies are the scientific process. Responsible citizens living in technological
also a mainstay of field biology. cultures sometimes must make decisions about contested scientific
issues they read about in the media. Some reports have linked the
radiation from cell phones to brain tumors, but other reports find
The Scientific Method Leads to Theories no connection. A few concerned citizens have demanded that man-
ufacturers produce “safer” cell phones, with lower radiation emis-
Observation, experimentation, and analysis are the basis for scien- sions. Can you think of an experiment that would resolve this issue,
tific reasoning. Once a group of related hypotheses have survived at least in principle? Would this be best answered by an observa-
rigorous testing without being disproved, they are accepted as a tional or experimental approach? As you read about scientific stud-
theory. Theories are not facts but rather extremely well supported ies on current issues, ask yourself: What types of controlled and
explanations of the natural world that nobody has disproved. To a observational experiments underlie the claims being made? Are the
scientist, a theory is much more than a hypothesis or a belief−it’s our experiments convincing?
best effort to date to explain nature. Many fields of science may be
involved in supporting a theory. The theory of evolution through nat-
ural selection, for example, is supported by taxonomists, geologists,
paleontologists, geneticists, and even embryologists. Many scientists Critical Reasoning Is Useful in Human
have tried, but none has refuted the basic hypothesis first described Biology
by Charles Darwin in 1859. We will discuss another key theory, the
cell theory, in Chapter 4. The ability to question and criticize−for example, our constantly
Science is not a perfect, set-in-stone answer to questions about changing understanding of obesity or the dangers posed by food
the natural world but rather a dynamic, ever-changing collection of additives or environmental chemicals−is useful in many aspects of
ideas. New information can change or destroy accepted explana- human biology. Critically analyze the data, experiments, and claims
tions for the natural world. For example, doctors once blamed con- before you accept what you read. There are plenty of opinions out
tagious disease on ill humors, miasmas, and evil spirits. Through there; don’t accept any until you consider the evidence and reach an
the work of 19th-century biologist Louis Pasteur, it became clear informed decision. Form your own opinion based on what you under-
that many diseases were caused by microscopic organisms. In his stand to be true.
breakthrough experiment, Pasteur sterilized some grape juice and In other words, become a critical reasoner! Critical reasoners are
showed that it did not ferment into wine. Then he added yeast, and skeptical, logical, and open to new information, enjoying the way it
the juice fermented. When Pasteur showed through experiment that changes their previous assumptions and ideas. Critical reasoners
invisible organisms can also cause disease, he helped establish the question assumptions and stated facts, using logic to arrive at their
germ theory of disease. Although it’s called a theory, the germ theory own conclusions. They find good analogies for information that they
is the universally accepted scientific explanation for infectious dis- find to be true, often helping others make sense of the new informa-
ease. More recently, the accepted role of the cell nucleus has come tion. Taking on the role of a critical thinker means recognizing that
into question. Based on experiments, biologists used to consider the you don’t have to settle for a story or a very small sample size when
nucleus the cell’s control center, but new evidence suggests that it looking for facts about an issue. You should ask yourself, “Were there
actually functions more like a library for genetic data. The actual enough trials done to see that the results were repeated consistently?”
control of gene expression and cellular activity seems to reside out- Also, critical reasoners know that there are limits to certainty but do
side the nucleus, in specific RNA molecules. The theory of nuclear not allow this knowledge to prevent them from seeking as full an
control in the cell is under serious scrutiny, and further experiments understanding of an issue as possible.
could alter it. People have the ability not only to communicate in complex ways
Scientific studies are part of the daily news. As technology but also to record the past. We can consult studies, relate current affairs
advances, humans confront scientific hypotheses and experimen- to similar historical events, and use statistics to support our reasoning.
tal results almost every day. We see advertisements for new drugs. In so doing, we understand that the past proves the law of unintended
consequences—that actions often have unexpected effects. For exam- between the body and its external environment. Studying human biol-
ple, using naturally cool stream water as an industrial plant coolant ogy is the perfect way to practice your critical reasoning skills, as you
saves money and seems to be a good use of the available resources. will be investigating the most complex system we know—ourselves
However, the practice dramatically increases the temperature of these and our relationship to our environment.
streams below the plant. The temperature increase, in turn, changes
the population of organisms that are able to survive there and often
alters the productivity of the entire watershed below the plant.
Critical reasoning is not the kind of thinking illustrated by the fact
Concept Check
that 87% of people rate themselves above average in intelligence. It is
1. Why must scientists constantly refine their hypotheses when conducting
also not illustrated by the notion that because a woman was cured of
experiments?
her epilepsy after being bitten by a rattlesnake, the venom caused the
cure. Rather, critical reasoning is the best way to understand complex 2. What is the difference between a hypothesis and theory?
interactions such as those that take place within the human body and
Scientific Findings Often Lead to Ethical Dilemmas 13
FIGURE 1.7 Nuclear power Nuclear power poses an interesting mix of scientific and political issues.
Atomic fission can provide a large amount of energy, and it does not create greenhouse gases, which warm
the globe and threaten harm to the biosphere. However, radioactive waste is dangerous, and nuclear plants
can suffer accidents causing meltdowns that spew radiation. The decision to use nuclear power is a p olitical
decision, not a scientific one, so it is imperative that each member of society understands the scientific data
on nuclear reactors, as well as the social ramifications of that information. Nuclear power has pluses and
minuses. To take a position, you should know about global warming, radioactive waste, and the costs and
benefits of other technologies for making electricity—all scientific issues.
Raymond Gehman / National Geographic Creative
altruistic Putting the needs of others ahead of, or equal to, personal ethical decision A decision based on the principles of right and wrong
needs. rather than on financial, personal, or political gain.
14 CHA PT E R 1 What Is Life?
Summary
1 Living Organisms Display Nine Specific 3 Scientists Approach Questions Using the Scientific
Characteristics 2 Method 9
• Cell biology is the study of life. One characteristic of life is organization. • Science is more a way of thinking than a body of knowledge.
Living things are organized from microscopic to macroscopic. All life is • The steps of the scientific method include:
also composed of cells and is r esponsive to the environment. Life adapts,
• Observation: witnessing an unusual or unexpected phenomenon
uses energy, and reproduces.
• Hypothesis: formulating an educated guess as to why the phenome-
• Living organisms are composed of carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and
non occurs
nucleic acids. In order to maintain life, these organisms must maintain
a relatively constant internal environment, called “homeostasis.” This is • Experiment: designing and running a controlled experiment to test the
accomplished through a feedback system, including a receptor, a control validity of the hypothesis
center, and an effector. The usual feedback system in the body is a nega- • Collection of results and analysis: recording the results of the exper-
tive feedback system. imental procedure and determining the meaning of the results
obtained from the experiment
2 Human Biology Is Structured and Logical 4 • Communication of the findings: preparing a paper, presenting a
poster, or speaking about the results of the experiment
• The natural organization of life on Earth is based on a system of increasing
complexity. The base of this hierarchy is the atom, meaning that the basis of
biology is actually chemistry. Atoms combine to form molecules. Molecules 4 Scientific Findings Often Lead to Ethical Dilemmas 13
join together to form cells. Similar cells form tissues; tissues with a common • Science in and of itself is neither inherently good nor bad. It is in the use of
function form organs; organs with similar functions form organ systems; scientific principles that value judgments are made. Science can be used
and a group of organ systems all functioning together form an organism. for either the betterment of society or its destruction.
• Taxonomy is the study of classification. Organisms are classified based • Individuals who understand the ramifications of a science are the ones
on shared characteristics. Each successive level gets more restrictive, who should decide about its use. In democratic nations, however, these
until only one interbreeding species is described. ethical decisions are placed in the hands of the voters. In order to make
• The five basic processes underlying human biology are osmosis and diffu- the right choices, we must all understand at least a little bit about the
sion, energy transfer and storage, protein functioning, DNA function, and functioning of the biological world in which we live. We must become crit-
cellular structure and function. ical reasoners.
Key Terms
• altruistic 13 • organ system 2 • taxonomy 7
• cell 2 • population 5 • theory 11
• ethical decision 13 • radiation 3 • tissue 2
• kingdom 7 • species 7 • variable 9
• organ 2 • statistical significance 10 • viable 7
What is happening in this picture? 15
Think Critically
1. Devise a plausible hypothesis for the experimental data collection that
you see here.
2. How might the results of the observations listed above (heart rate,
breathing rate, lung volume, and blood pH) provide evidence of
increased or decreased individual health following exercise?
We Fit?
Everything
What a Scientist Sees: What Is Your Ethnic
Background?
Ethics and Issues: Are Humans Still Evolving?
I Wonder. . . How Are Fossilized Human Remains
“But Miss, why is human biology taught in the Zoology department? Isn’t zoology
“Interpreted” to Produce Our Family Tree?
the study of ANIMALS?” The student asking this question stood in the lecture hall,
sporting an armload of books and a quizzical expression. Perhaps it had never What Does the Human Body Have in Common
occurred to her to think about humans in this light. We are, in fact, animals. We with the World Around It? 23
are multicellular, we cannot manufacture our own food, we undergo an embryonic
• Energy Flows Between Molecules
developmental stage, and we are mobile. In addition, we require food, shelter, and
the company of others. The environment in which we live shapes our lives, and we • We Are Consumers
in turn have shaped that environment.
We Reflect Our Environment: We Have a Habitat
When we really look at ourselves, we find very little separating us from the
and a Niche 29
chimpanzee. Our DNA, the hereditary molecule, is at least 98% identical to that of
the chimp. Both chimpanzees and humans form cooperative groups for hunting • Habitats Have Limitations
and socializing. Both use tools. Chimps rear their young for at least five years, and • Humans Are Animals
family groups form bonds that remain for lifetimes. Even more basic, humans and
Health, Wellness, and Disease: Environmental
other animals respond to changes in their environment with short- and long-term
adaptations. These adaptations can be changes in behavior, in food choices, or
Illness: Real or Imagined?
even in body form over long periods of time.
We are biological beings, and as such we are subject to the same laws, the-
ories, and ideas as the rest of the biological world. So, while we like to think of
ourselves as above the life struggles of, say, earthworms, it is really not the case.
16
What Are the Origins of Modern Humans? 17
FIGURE 2.1 The human family tree The members of the order Primates have diverged relatively recently.
Within the past 10 million years, chimpanzees and modern humans diverged from a common ancestor. Even
more recently, the pathway leading to modern humans produced the now extinct genus Australopithicine.
PROSIMIANS ANTHROPOIDS
PROSIMIANS ANTHROPOIDS
A NEW-WORLD OLD-WORLD APES AND
A NEW-WORLD
MONKEYS OLD-WORLD
MONKEYS APES AND
HUMANS Think Critically
MONKEYS
B MONKEYS
C HUMANS
D Recently researchers conducting fieldwork
Life On White / Digital Vision /
B C D
in Africa studying parasites in gorillas took
Samohin / iStockphoto / precautions to stay at least 35 feet away from
nizha2 / Getty Images
JackF / iStockphoto /
Getty Images
Getty Images
Chimpanzees
Marmosets
Capuchins
Macaques
monkeys
monkeys
monkeys
Tarsiers
Orangutans
Guenons
Mangabeys
Baboons
Tarsioids
Marmosets
Gibbons
Humans
Capuchins
Langurs
Macaques
Squirrel
monkeys
monkeys
monkeys
Gorillas
Millions
Tarsiers
Lemurs
Lorises
Guenons
Spider
Baboons
Tarsioids
Gibbons
Humans
Patas
Langurs
Squirrel
Gorillas
Millions
of years
Lemurs
Lorises
Spider
Patas
of years
ago
ago0
0 Australo-
Australo-
pithecines
pithecines
10
10
20
20
EPOCHS
30
EPOCHS
30
40
40
50
50
60
60
70
70
opposable thumb A thumb that can move across the other four digits. stereoscopic vision Three-dimensional vision created by two slightly
different views superimposed on one another.
18 CHA PT E R 2 Where Do We Come from and Where Do We Fit?
Approximately 30 million years ago, the ancestor of apes and It is worth an aside here to discuss the definition of evolution.
humans diverged from the ancestors of old-world monkeys, as shown When anthropologists say that humans evolved in Africa, what they
in Figure 2.1. Apes and humans are larger and have larger brains and are saying is that the genetic information carried in our ancestors’ DNA
smaller tails than monkeys. Our tails are so small, in fact, that they are not was altered in such a way that a new species came about while our
visible outside the body. Apes and humans are further distinguished by ancestors lived in Africa. DNA, the hereditary material carried in the
their complex social interactions. Comparisons of the structures of mol- nucleus of almost all of our cells, naturally undergoes slight random
ecules such as functional proteins found in all apes and humans indicate modifications. Over time and with selection pressure from the envi-
that gibbons diverged first, followed by orangutans, gorillas, chimpan- ronment, those modifications can lead to new genes or new forms of
zees, and humans. To be clear, we did not develop from a c himpanzee, existing genes.
but rather chimpanzees and humans diverged most recently from a com- When new forms of existing genes arise, they direct the creation
mon ancestor that probably slightly resembled both. of proteins with slightly different functions than the original proteins
Continuing with the human taxonomic classification, we belong formed from the original genes. These alternate forms of genes are
to the genus Homo, with the species epithet sapiens. As we noted ear- called alleles. Alleles are genes that code for proteins with similar, but
lier, Homo sapiens are unique in that they possess an upright bipedal not identical, functions. For example, the gene that codes for blood
stance, an opposable thumb, an enlarged brain case, and the capacity type A and the gene that codes for blood type B are alleles – different
for complex speech communication. The fossil record contains many forms of the same basic blood protein gene.
other Homo species, each carrying this unique combination of four Any change in the frequency of genetic alleles is termed evolu-
characteristics with slight modifications. These modifications define tion. Therefore, when the ancestor of modern man was living in Africa,
the various hominid species and allow the different species to thrive new alleles were introduced into the population through random
in the diverse ecosystems of our biosphere. Although scientists are still changes in DNA. Over time, this change in allele frequency, or evolu-
debating the specifics of human evolution, most agree on the basic tion, led to an upright posture, a larger brain case, and eventually the
pathway: that humans evolved in Africa when a primate began to walk organism we know today as Homo sapiens. See Figure 2.2 for more of
upright as its usual form of locomotion. the human family tree.
FIGURE 2.2 A closer look at the human family tree Human evolution is complicated and difficult to
trace. Each fossil that is discovered leads to new questions, rather than clear answers.
Biology: Understanding Life by Sandra and Brian Alters, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
H. sapiens
skull
fragments of arm, fragments H. erectus
thigh, jaw, teeth only H. ergaster
H. habilis
A. A.
O. tugenensis anamensis afarensis
A. africanus
S. tchadensis A. ramidus
skull A. aethiopicus
fragments
only A. robustus
Copyright 2006
A. boisei
7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Millions of years ago
The Human Ancestors Are Dead Twigs Almost 2 million years ago, another s peciation event
produced Homo erectus and Homo ergaster Lighter
on the Family Tree and more graceful than H. habilis, these organisms can be classified
as humans, for they had subtle differences from the great apes in
How long have Homo sapiens walked Earth? In February 2005, new
cranial capacity, stature, and gait, as shown in Figure 2.4. Originally,
dating techniques were applied to human fossil remains found in 1967
these two were classified together as H. erectus. H. ergaster was dis-
by Richard Leakey. The critical skull findings are shown in Figure 2.3.
tinguished in 1994, when scientists discovered that their skulls were
These fossils included some bones and two skulls Leakey uncovered
different. H. ergaster has a high skull bone, thin cranial bones, a slim
on opposite sides of the Omo River in Ethiopia. At the time of the find-
brow ridge, and a generally lighter skeleton than H. erectus. Both had
ing, the two fossils were dated at 130,000 years old. Recent evidence
a swift gait; long, muscled limbs; narrow hips; and body proportions
suggests that they are in fact much older. Scientists now believe these
like those of modern tropical humans. Sexual dimorphism was effec-
two fossils to be the oldest known human remains. Omo I and Omo II,
tively lost in this group, indicating that both males and females proba-
as the fossils are called, date the emergence of modern humans in
bly participated in the same societal activities. Infant development was
Africa to 195,000 years ago.
extended, allowing a longer family period for passing on learned traits
and culture. These primates continued to make hunting tools and eat-
The genus Homo was preceded by even earlier ing equipment.
versions of humans Australopithecus was the first member of Although scientists are not clear on the exact date, it appears
the family Hominidae. This organism walked upright, and its cranium that Homo erectus and H. ergaster migrated out of Africa approxi-
was slightly larger than that of previous, nonhuman primates. Interest- mately 1 million years ago and began to populate other continents.
ingly, the first hominid was an omnivore, eating both plant and animal H. erectus may have left Africa to avoid environmental changes during
foodstuffs, and was relatively small in stature. A second Australopith- an ice age. They remained a part of the biota of Java as recently as
ecine, A. afarensis, was slightly larger and, based on dentition, ate like 500,000 years ago, making them contemporaries of modern Homo
a modern vegetarian. These organisms showed social behaviors and sapiens.
sexual dimorphism similar to that of apes. Neanderthals hold a special fascination for us, perhaps because of
About 3 million years ago, Homo habilis appeared to share their recent evolution. Some scholars believe these hominids evolved as
the planet with A. afarensis. This organism had a larger brain than a separate species from H. erectus. Others think H. erectus first evolved
A. afarensis, new types of teeth that allowed it to eat a more varied into a form that was very close to modern humans, which then gave rise
diet, and perhaps the ability to make and use tools. Homo habilis lit- to both modern humans and Neanderthals. Are Neanderthals and mod-
erally means “handy man,” and many of the H. habilis fossils are sur- ern humans related closely enough to be subspecies of Homo sapiens?
rounded by stones that could be primitive tools. In 1964, this was the accepted wisdom, based on anatomical similarities.
FIGURE 2.3 Omo I and Omo II skull fragments A photograph of the Omo fossils as they were discovered.
Stephen L. Alvarez / NG Image Collection
NG maps
cranium Brain case, or skull. sexual dimorphism Morphological differences between the two genders.
20 CHA PT E R 2 Where Do We Come from and Where Do We Fit?
FIGURE 2.4 A comparison of the skeletons of apes and Homo erectus Note the skeletal similarities
of these two organisms, despite their difference in appearance.
Long forearm
Apparently, the two existed on the Earth at the same time, as indicated 100,000 years ago. Wherever H. sapiens appeared, they replaced all
by fossil sites in Israel, where geologic strata indicate that H. sapiens lived other hominids. We cannot be certain why, as the fossil record gives
at that location before H. neanderthalensis. Not much is understood of no indication of violence between species of hominids, nor does it
the interactions between these two species. It may be that they coexisted provide evidence of disease. Did H. sapiens really fight and kill Nean-
peacefully, or even interbred. DNA studies of our current human genome derthals? Did Neanderthals fall victim to viruses that did not harm H.
indicate that up to 20% of the Neanderthal genome is carried in modern sapiens? Did Neanderthals breed with H. sapiens, eventually losing
man. These genes can be found throughout our current population, add- their characteristics as their genes were diluted in the larger H. sapiens
ing evidence to the theory that Neanderthals and modern human spe- gene pool? The questions are tantalizing, but we may never know
cies coexisted. Even at a glance, Neanderthals and modern humans look their answers. See the Ethics and Issues: Are Humans Still Evolving? box to
extremely similar (see Figure 2.5). Extrapolating from other animal’s investigate modern human evolution.
extinction events, it is possible that the physically weaker genus Homo
may have exploited a slight environmental advantage to outcompete Human population differences and ethnicity are
their larger and stronger but slower Neanderthal peers. tangled concepts The bottom line on the evolution of humans
is that we are all one species. Do we look different? Yes, we do look a
bit different, as seen in Figure 2.6. Humans have subtle physical dif-
Homo sapiens Appears and Starts ferences that are heritable and that are usually associated with one
to Change Everything group of people. See What a Scientist Sees: What is Your Ethnic Back-
ground? for information on determining an individual’s ethnicity.
It is difficult to pinpoint the exact beginning of Homo sapiens. Some For almost all of our history, human populations were small and
scientists believe that all modern humans came from one small pop- isolated by geographic barriers such as forests, deserts, oceans, riv-
ulation in Africa that splintered, migrated, and populated the globe. ers, and mountains. During this isolation, natural selection and other
This splintering must have happened approximately 140,000 to mechanisms of population change, such as sexual selection, favored
FIGURE 2.5 Neanderthal versus modern human This image allows a FIGURE 2.6 Human variation This group of ethnically diverse school
direct comparison of the facial features of Neanderthals on the left and mod- children exemplifies the many different phenotypes, or appearances, now
ern Homo sapiens on the right. found in the human population.
What Is Your Ethnic Background? 2. Do you know your ethnic background? How well do your physi-
cal traits match up to the groups with which you claim? Would it
Sociologists use physical traits, among other bits of evidence, to cate- be difficult for you to learn that your DNA carried genetic mark-
gorize humans into ethnic groups. DNA carries the instructions for pro- ers of different ethnic groups?
teins in the body, and these proteins help to form our physical traits.
Can we then, use DNA to identify our ethnicity?
Well not exactly, but DNA tests can help narrow it down. These tests
take a sample of your DNA and compare it to the database of human
DNA worldwide. When significant stretches of your DNA match those of
a particular ethnic group, it is assumed that you have a common link –
an ancestor – within that community. The science behind this is sound,
however there are problems. Most importantly, the human DNA data-
base is incomplete leaving many ethnic groups unrepresented. Also,
genetic variability is not a series of discrete points between ethnic ori-
Rawpixel / Shutterstock
Think Critically
1. Why is it important to include ALL human genomes in this data-
base before making definitive statements?
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
born of Savoyard parents, in 1493, at Seyssel. At seventeen he
became prior of St. Victor, a community of Benedictines near
Geneva. Revolutionist at heart, he entered into the struggle against
the duke of Savoy, who in 1519 imprisoned him and confiscated his
priory. He died in 1570, aged seventy-seven years, after a troubled
youth and a melancholy old age as pensioner in the city where he
had once been a man of mark. He left behind him the invaluable
chronicle of his time, written half in Latin, half in the quaint French of
his day, in a style at once rude and naive, familiar and vigorous, and
brimming with picturesque imagery and lively metaphor.
Bonnechose, E. de, Les Réformateurs avant la Réforme, Paris,
1860, 3rd edition, 2 vols.—Brandstetter, J. L., Repertorium über die
Zeit und Sammelschriften der Jahre, 1812-1890, Bâle, 1892.—
Bulletin official du Directoire Helvétique, 3 vols.—Bullinger, H.,
Reformationsgeschichte, Frauenfeld, 1838-40, 3 vols.
Henry Bullinger was born at Bremgarten in 1504 and died at
Zurich in 1575. After a preliminary course at Emmerich, his father
having refused him the means necessary to continue his education,
he made money by singing in the streets and in 1520 he
recommenced his studies at Cologne, with the idea of joining the
community of the Chartreux. But his resolution and his religion as
well were changed by his association with Zwingli, whose doctrine
he embraced and whose successor he became. In addition to his
history of the Reformation and numerous theological writings he
edited the complete works of Zwingli.
Burckhardt, Der Kirchenschatz des Münsters zu Basel, Bâle,
1867.
Jahn, H. A., Chronik des Cantons Bern, Bern, 1857; Der Keltische
Alterthum der Schweiz, Bern, 1860.
Henry Albert Jahn, Swiss historian and archæologist, professor at
Bern, formerly secretary of the department of the interior, was born
at Bern, October 9, 1811.
Johannis, Vitodurani, Chronicon, Zurich, 1856.—Jovii, P.,
Historiæ sui temporis, Bâle, 1567, 2 vols.—Jullien, Histoire de
Genève, 1865.—Jussie, Jeanne de, Levain de calvinisme, 1605.
A religious abbess of the convent of St. Claire, whence she was
driven in 1535, together with the other members of the community, to
seek refuge at Annecy, where she later became abbess. She has
pictured for us in all its crudity the conflict of popular passions in the
most primitive style, and in language, which is in itself an index to the
comedy, the tragedy, and the overwhelmingly gross superstition of
her day and generation.
Justinger, C., Bernerchronik, Bern, 1871.