Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download pdf of (eBook PDF) Horngren's Financial & Managerial Accounting, The Managerial Chapters, Global Edition 6th Edition all chapter
Full Download pdf of (eBook PDF) Horngren's Financial & Managerial Accounting, The Managerial Chapters, Global Edition 6th Edition all chapter
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-horngrens-financial-
managerial-accounting-the-financial-chapters-global-edition-6th-
edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-horngrens-financial-
managerial-accounting-the-financial-chapters-7th-edition/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/horngrens-financial-and-
managerial-accounting-the-financial-chapters-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-horngrens-accounting-
the-managerial-chapters-12th-edition/
Cost Accounting a Managerial Emphasis 2th by Charles
Horngren
http://ebooksecure.com/product/cost-accounting-a-managerial-
emphasis-2th-by-charles-horngren/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/original-pdf-horngrens-financial-
managerial-accounting-6th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/original-pdf-horngren-s-cost-
accounting-a-managerial-emphasis-3rd/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-financial-managerial-
accounting-13-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/financial-managerial-
accounting-13th-edition-ebook-pdf/
Contents
CHAPTER 16 What Happens When Products Are Completed and Sold? 89
Transferring Costs to Finished Goods Inventory 90
Transferring Costs to Cost of Goods Sold 90
Introduction to Managerial Accounting 27
How Is the Manufacturing Overhead Account Adjusted? 91
Why Is Managerial Accounting Important? 28 At the End of the Period—Adjusting for Overallocated and
Managers' Role in the Organization 29 Underallocated Overhead 91
Managerial Accounting Functions 30 Summary of Journal Entries 93
Ethical Standards of Managers 31 Cost of Goods Manufactured and Cost of Goods Sold 95
How Are Costs Classified? 33 How Do Service Companies Use a Job Order Costing
Manufacturing Companies 33 System? 97
Direct and Indirect Costs 34
■■Review 99
Manufacturing Costs 34
Prime and Conversion Costs 35 ■■Assess Your Progress 105
Product and Period Costs 36 ■■Critical Thinking 125
How Do Manufacturing Companies Prepare Financial
Statements? 38
Balance Sheet 38
CHAPTER 18
Income Statement 38 Process Costing 129
Product Costs Flow Through a Manufacturing Company 39 How Do Costs Flow Through a Process Costing System? 130
Calculating Cost of Goods Manufactured 40 Job Order Costing Versus Process Costing 130
Calculating Cost of Goods Sold 42 Flow of Costs Through a Process Costing System 131
Flow of Costs Through the Inventory Accounts 43 What Are Equivalent Units Of Production, and How Are
Using the Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured to Calculate Unit They Calculated? 134
Product Cost 43 Equivalent Units of Production 135
What Are Business Trends That Are Affecting Managerial How Is a Production Cost Report Prepared For the First
Accounting? 45 Department? 136
Shift Toward a Service Economy 45 Production Cost Report—First Process—Assembly Department 137
Global Competition 45
Time-Based Competition 45
How Is a Production Cost Report Prepared for Subsequent
Total Quality Management 45 Departments? 143
The Triple Bottom Line 46 Production Cost Report—Second Process—Cutting Department 143
What Journal Entries Are Required in a Process Costing
How Is Managerial Accounting Used In Service and
System? 150
Merchandising Companies? 47
Transaction 1—Raw Materials Purchased 150
Calculating Cost per Service 47
Transaction 2—Raw Materials Used in Production 151
Calculating Cost per Item 47
Transaction 3—Labor Costs Incurred 151
■■Review 48 Transaction 4—Additional Manufacturing Costs Incurred 151
■■Assess Your Progress 52 Transaction 5—Allocation of Manufacturing Overhead 152
■■Critical Thinking 71 Transaction 6—Transfer from the Assembly Department to the
Cutting Department 152
Transaction 7—Transfer from Cutting Department to Finished Goods
8 Contents
Contents 9
How Are Standard Costs Used to Determine Manufacturing How Does Performance Evaluation in Investment Centers
Overhead Variances? 450 Differ from Other Centers? 507
Return on Investment (ROI) 508
Allocating Overhead in a Standard Cost
Residual Income (RI) 511
System 451
Limitations of Financial Performance Measures 512
Variable Overhead Variances 451
Fixed Overhead Variances 453 How Do Transfer Prices Affect Decentralized
Companies? 514
What Is the Relationship Among the Product Cost
Objectives in Setting Transfer Prices 514
Variances, And Who Is Responsible for
Setting Transfer Prices 515
Them? 456
Variance Relationships 457 ■■Review 517
Variance Responsibilities 458 ■■Assess Your Progress 523
How Do Journal Entries Differ in a Standard Cost ■■Critical Thinking 535
System? 459 ■■Comprehensive Problem for Chapters 22–24 535
Journal Entries 459
Standard Cost Income Statement 463
■■Review 465
■■Assess Your Progress 473
■■Critical Thinking 488
10 Contents
Contents 11
Chapter 16
Expanded the discussion of managerial accounting to include manager’s role in the organization and managerial accounting
functions.
Clarified and expanded the discussion of how companies classify costs used in managerial accounting.
Revised the discussion on manufacturing cost flows, including better explanation of how cost of goods manufactured and cost of
goods sold are calculated.
Expanded discussion on business trends that are affecting managerial accounting.
Chapter 17
Expanded the discussion on cost accounting systems, including why companies choose either process or job-order costing.
Clarified the discussion on the allocation and adjustment of manufacturing overhead.
Chapter 18
REVISED! For consistency throughout the chapter, all company examples now use the same company, Puzzle Me, to better
understand how costs flow through a process costing system and are reflected on the production cost report.
Expanded and clarified discussion on equivalent units of production.
REVISED! The discussion on preparing a production cost report was split into two learning objectives (first department and
subsequent departments) allowing faculty to omit the discussion on subsequent departments.
REVISED! Discussion on preparing a production cost report for the first department now realistically reflects beginning inventory.
Updated the discussion on how the weighted-average method is different than the FIFO method when preparing the production
cost report.
Chapter 19
Clarified the differences between the use of a single plantwide rate versus a multiple department rate when allocating overhead.
Expanded the discussion of how service companies can use activity-based management.
Chapter 20
Moved discussion of breakeven point before coverage of target profit for better student understanding.
Clarified the high-low method when determining a company’s variable and fixed costs.
NEW! Discussion on how sensitivity analysis could be used and the differences between predicted cost behavior versus actual man-
agement behavior.
Chapter 21
Expanded discussion on the differences between absorption and variable costing and the impact on operating income.
12
Chapter 23
Expanded the discussion on performance reports using static budgets, including advantages and disadvantages.
Chapter 26
NEW! Added discussion on future value, including determining the future value of a lump sum and of an annuity.
Appendix C
Modified the wording in Changes to Current Assets and Current Liabilities section of preparing the statement of cash flows, indirect
method, to emphasize adjustments are made to net income to convert from accrual basis to cash basis.
Appendix D
Rearranged the liquidity ratios from most stringent to least stringent (cash ratio, acid-test ratio, current ratio).
NEW! Added problem (both A and B series) that has students complete a trend analysis and ratios to analyze a company for its
investment potential.
http://www.pearsonglobaleditions.com/Sitemap/Horngren/
13
NEW!
ACT Comprehensive Problem
The A ccounting Cycle Tutorial now includes a comprehensive p roblem that a llows students to work with the same
set of transactions throughout the accounting cycle. The comprehensive problem, which can be assigned at the beginning or
the end of the full cycle, reinforces the lessons learned in the a ccounting cycle tutorial activities by emphasizing the connec-
tions between the accounting cycle concepts.
Study Plan
The Study Plan acts as a tutor, providing personalized recommendations for each of your students based on his or her abil-
ity to master the learning objectives in your course. This allows students to focus their study time by pinpointing the precise
areas they need to review, and allowing them to use customized practice and learning aids–such as videos, eText, tutorials, and
more–to get them back on track. Using the report available in the Gradebook, you can then tailor course lectures to prioritize
the content where students need the most support–offering you better insight into classroom and individual performance.
14
Animated Lectures
These pre-class learning aids are available for every learning
objective and are professor-narrated PowerPoint summaries
that will help students prepare for class. These can be used
in an online or flipped classroom experience or simply to get
students ready for lecture.
Chapter Openers
Chapter openers set up the concepts to be covered in
the chapter using stories students can relate to. The
implications of those concepts on a company’s report-
ing and decision making processes are then discussed.
Try It!
Steve and Linda Hom live in Bartlesville, Oklahoma. Two years ago, they visited
Thailand. Linda, a professional chef, was impressed with the cooking methods and the 15
spices used in Thai food. Bartlesville does not have a Thai restaurant, and the Homs
A furniture manufacturer specializes in wood tables. The tables sell for $100 per unit and incur $40 per unit in variable costs. The are contemplating opening one. Linda would supervise the cooking, and Steve would
company has $6,000 in fixed costs per month. Expected sales are 200 tables per month.
leave his current job to be the maître d’. The restaurant would serve dinner Tuesday
17. Calculate the margin of safety in units. through Saturday.
18. Determine the degree of operating leverage. Use expected sales. Steve has noticed a restaurant for lease. The restaurant has seven tables, each
19. The company begins manufacturing wood chairs to match the tables. Chairs sell for $50 each and have variable costs of $30. of which can seat four. Tables can be moved together for a large party. Linda is
The new production process increases fixed costs to $7,000 per month. The expected sales mix is one table for every four planning on using each table twice each evening, and the restaurant will be open 50
chairs. Calculate the breakeven point in units for each product. weeks per year.
Check your answers online in MyAccountingLab or at http://www.pearsonhighered.com/Horngren. The Homs have drawn up the following estimates:
A01_NOBL6260_06_GE_FM.indd 15 18/05/2018 14:11
CHA
16
Ac Lc + ET
WIPc Wages MOHc
=
Payablec
169,000 197,000 + (28,000)
Try It!
Record the following journal entries for Smith Company:
6. Purchased raw materials on account, $10,000.
7. Used $6,000 in direct materials and $500 in indirect materials in production.
8. Incurred $8,000 in labor costs, of which 80% was direct labor.
Check your answers online in Pearson MyLab Accounting or at http://www.pearsonglobaleditions.com/Sitemap/
Horngren/.
For more practice, see Short Exercises S17-2 through S17-4. Pearson MyLab Accounting
To summarize, the total costs assigned and allocated to Client 367 are as follows:
As you can see from the above example, just like a manufacturing company, a service
company can use a job order cost system to assign direct costs and allocate indirect costs
to jobs.
Now that the service company has a good estimate for total job costs, it is better pre-
pared to make pricing decisions. The total hourly rate for the company is $80, which is $50
per hour for direct labor plus $30 per hour for indirect costs. The firm can use cost-plus
pricing to set the rate charged to clients. For example, if the firm desires a profit equal to
75% of the firm’s cost, then the price would be calculated as follows:
Decision Boxes Markup = Total cost * Markup percentage
This feature provides common questions and potential
= $80 per solutions
hour * 75% business owners face. Students
= $60 per hour
DECISIONS
What should the company charge?
Refer to the information for the service company example, Walsh incurred $700 in direct costs. At a 50% markup, Walsh would add
Associates. Assume Jacob Walsh desires a profit equal to 50% of the $350 ($700 * 50%) and charge the client $1,050 ($700 + $350).
firm’s cost. Should Walsh consider only the direct costs when mak- That means Walsh would not cover the full cost of providing service
ing pricing decisions? How much should the firm bill Client 367? to the client. The loss on the job would be $70 ($1,050 - $1,120).
He left out the indirect costs. The markup should be 50% of
Solution the total cost, $560 ($1,120 * 50%). The amount charged to
Walsh should consider more than just the direct labor costs the client would be $1,680, which would generate a profit of
when determining the amount to charge his clients. Client 367 $560 ($1,680 - $1,120).
Try It!
Wesson Company is a consulting firm. The firm expects to have $45,000 in indirect costs during the year and bill customers for 17
6,000 hours. The cost of direct labor is $75 per hour.
16. Calculate the predetermined overhead allocation rate for Wesson using estimated billable hours for the allocation base.
17. Wesson completed a consulting job for George Peterson and billed the customer for 15 hours. What was the total cost of
the consulting job?
18. If Wesson wants to earn a profit equal to 60% of the cost of a job, how much should the company charge Mr. Peterson?
REVIEW
> Things You Should Know Things You Should Know
1. Why is managerial accounting important? Provides students with a brief review of each
■ Managerial accounting focuses on providing information for internal decision learning objective presented in a question
makers.
■ Managerial accounting helps managers plan, direct, control, and make decisions about
and answer format.
the business.
904 chapter 16 ■
inventory and not expensed until the product is sold.
CRITICAL THINKING
Period costs are all costs not considered product costs, such as selling and administra-
tive costs. Period costs are expensed in the accounting period incurred.
NEW!
Using Excel
3. How do manufacturing companies prepare financial statements?
> Using Excel
P
roblems
d. Complete the amounts to the right. Use the Excel function SUM to sum amounts on the schedule.
■ P20-47 Using Excel for cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis
Manufacturing companies list the three inventory accounts (Raw Materials Inventory,
e. Format the cells requiring dollar signs.Work-in-Process Inventory, and Finished Goods Inventory) on the balance
This end of chapter problem introduces sheet.
Download an Excel template for this problem online in Pearson MyLab Accounting or at http://www.pearsonglobaleditions.com/
Sitemap/Horngren/.
f. Format underlines or double underlines Theasincome
needed.statement for a manufacturing company involves the calculation of cost
g. Boldface the total.
students ■
to Excel to solve common
of goods manufactured and cost of goods sold. The Oceanside Garden Nursery buys flowering plants in four-inch pots for $1.00 each and sells them for $2.50 each. Management
budgets monthly fixed costs of $2,100 for sales volumes between 0 and 5,000 plants.
3. accounting
Using the results from Requirement 2, calculate
■ theproblems
The calculation
cost of
percost asgoods
unitoffor they
goods wouldinvolves
manufactured
manufactured in three16,000
assuming steps. units were manufac-
Requirements
tured. Use the blue shaded areas for inputs. Use a formula to calculate the cost per unit.
the business environment. Students
Step 1. Calculate direct materials used. Direct Materials Used 1. = Beginning Direct Mate-
Use the contribution margin approach to compute the company’s monthly breakeven point in units.
4. Complete the Cost of Goods Sold schedule. rialsBeginning Finished
+ Purchases Goods
of Direct had 500
Materials units that
(including had aIn)cost
Freight of $0.98
-2.Ending each.Materials.
Ending Fin-
Use theDirect
ished Goods Inventory had 700will units. work from a template that will aid contribution margin ratio approach to compute the breakeven point in sales dollars.
COMPREHENSIVE PROBLEM
Comprehensive Problem for > Comprehensive Problem for Chapters 16–20
Chapters 16–20—Covers fundamental
The Jacksonville Shirt Company makes two types of T-shirts: basic and custom. Basic
managerial accounting concepts: job order shirts are plain shirts without any screen printing on them. Custom shirts are created
costing, process costing, cost management using the basic shirts and then adding a custom screen printing design.
The company buys cloth in various colors and then makes the basic shirts in
systems, and cost-volume-profit analysis. two departments, Cutting and Sewing. The company uses a process costing system
(weighted-average method) to determine the production cost of the basic shirts. In the
Comprehensive Problem for Cutting Department, direct materials (cloth) are added at the beginning of the process
Chapters 22–24—Covers planning and and conversion costs are added evenly through the process. In the Sewing Depart-
ment, no direct materials are added. The only additional material, thread, is considered
control decisions for a manufacturing com- an indirect material because it cannot be easily traced to the finished product. Conver-
sion costs are added evenly throughout the process in the Sewing Department. The
pany, including a master budget, flexible finished basic shirts are sold to retail stores or are sent to the Custom Design Depart-
budget, variance analysis, and performance ment for custom screen printing.
The Custom Design Department creates custom shirts by adding screen print-
evaluation. ing to the basic shirt. The department creates a design based on the customer’s request
and then prints the design using up to four colors. Because these shirts have the cus-
Comprehensive Problem for tom printing added, which is unique for each order, the additional cost incurred is
Chapters 25–26—Covers decision mak- determined using job order costing, with each custom order considered a separate job.
For March 2018, the Jacksonville Shirt Company compiled the following data for
ing, both short-term business decisions and the Cutting and Sewing Departments:
capital budgeting decisions. Department Item Amount Units
CHAPTER 20
and transferred to Finished Goods ??? 1,000 shirts
cessible self-assessment, MyLab with eText provides students with Ending a complete
balance, digital learning
60% complete ??? ???
experience—all in one place. For the same time period, the Jacksonville Shirt Company compiled the following data
And with the Pearson eText mobile app (available for
for the select
Custom titles)
Design students can now
Department:
access the eText and all of its functionality from their computer, Job
tablet, or mobile Printing
Quantity Design Fee
phone. Status
Because students’ progress is synced across all of their devices, 367 they400 can stopYeswhat 3they’re colors Complete
doing on one device and pick up again later on another one—without 368 breakingNotheir stride.
150 2 colors Complete
369 100 Yes 5 colors Complete
370 500 Yes 4 colors Complete
19
Thank you for taking the time to review Horngren’s Financial and Managerial Accounting. We are
excited to share our innovations with you as we expand on the proven success of our revision to
the Horngren franchise. Using what we learned from focus groups, market feedback, and our col-
leagues, we’ve designed this edition to focus on several goals.
First, we again made certain that the textbook, student resources, and instructor supplements
are clear, consistent, and accurate. As authors, we reviewed each and every component to ensure a
student experience free of hurdles. Next, through our ongoing conversations with our colleagues
and our time engaged at professional conferences, we confirmed that our pedagogy and content
represents the leading methods used in teaching our students these critical foundational topics.
Lastly, we concentrated on student success and providing resources for professors to create an
active and engaging classroom.
We are excited to share with you some new features and changes in this latest edition. First,
we have added a new Tying It All Together feature that highlights an actual company and addresses
how the concepts of the chapter apply to the business environment. A Using Excel problem has
also been added to every chapter to introduce students to using Excel to solve common accounting
problems as they would in the business environment. Chapter 5 (Merchandising Operations) has
been updated for the newly released revenue recognition standard. The managerial chapters went
through a significant review with a focus of clarifying current coverage and expanding on content
areas that needed more explanation.
We trust you will find evidence of these goals throughout our text, Pearson MyLab Account-
ing, eText, and in our many new media enhanced resources such as the Accounting Cycle Tutorial
with a new comprehensive problem and animated lectures. We welcome your feedback and com-
ments. Please do not hesitate to contact us at HorngrensAccounting@pearson.com or through
our editor, Lacey Vitetta, LaceyVitetta@pearson.com.
21
For Instructors
Pearson MyLab Accounting
Online Homework and Assessment Manager: http://www.myaccountinglab.com
Instructor Resource Center: http://www.pearsonglobaleditions.com/Sitemap/Horngren/
For the instructor’s convenience, the instructor resources can be downloaded from the textbook’s catalog page
(http://www.pearsonglobaleditions.com/Sitemap/Horngren/) and Pearson MyLab Accounting. Available resources include
the following:
Online Instructor’s Resource Manual:
Course Content:
■■ Tips for Taking Your Course from Traditional to Hybrid, Blended, or Online
■■ Standard Syllabi for Financial Accounting (10-week & 16-week)
■■ Standard Syllabi for Managerial Accounting (10-week & 16-week)
■■ Sample Syllabi for 10- and 16-week courses
■■ “First Day of Class” student handouts include:
● Student Walk-Through to Set-up Pearson MyLab Accounting
● Tips on How to Get an A in This Class
Chapter Content:
■■ Chapter Overview
● Contains a brief synopsis and overview of each chapter.
■■ Learning Objectives
■■ Teaching Outline with Lecture Notes
● Combines the Teaching Outline and the Lecture Outline Topics, so instructors only have one document to review.
● Walks instructors through what material to cover and what examples to use when addressing certain items within the chapter.
■■ Handout for Student Notes
● An outline to assist students in taking notes on the chapter.
■■ Student Chapter Summary
● Aids students in their comprehension of the chapter.
■■ Assignment Grid
● Indicates the corresponding Learning Objective for each exercise and problem.
● Answer Key to Chapter Quiz
■■ Ten-Minute Quiz
● To quickly assess students’ understanding of the chapter material.
■■ Extra Critical Thinking Problems and Solutions
● Critical Thinking Problems previously found in the text were moved to the IRM so instructors can continue to use their
favorite problems.
■■ Guide to Classroom Engagement Questions
● Author-created element will offer tips and tricks to instructors in order to help them use the Learning Catalytic questions in
class.
Online Instructor’s Solutions Manual:
■■ Contains solutions to all end-of-chapter questions, short exercises, exercises, and problems.
■■ The Try It! Solutions, previously found at the end of each chapter, are now available for download with the ISM.
■■ Using Excel templates, solutions, and teaching tips.
■■ All solutions were thoroughly reviewed by the author team and other professors.
23
PowerPoint Presentations:
Instructor PowerPoint Presentations:
■■ Complete with lecture notes.
■■ Mirrors the organization of the text and includes key exhibits.
Image Library:
■■ All image files from the text to assist instructors in modifying our supplied PowerPoint presentations or in creating their own
PowerPoint presentations.
Working Papers and Solutions:
■■ Available in Excel format.
■■ Templates for students to use to complete exercises and problems in the text.
For Students
Pearson MyLab Accounting
http://www.pearsonglobaleditions.com/Sitemap/Horngren/
24
That our Falstaff bore himself with credit on the field, is made clear in
spite of the incident of Hotspur. I do not pause to point out the
bearing of Morton’s answer, when Northumberland asks him, “Didst
thou come from Shrewsbury?”—“I ran from Shrewsbury, my noble
lord,” is the reply; confessing that he ran from a foe, among whom
Falstaff was a leader: I am more content to rest on the verdict of so
dignified yet unwilling a witness as the Lord Chief Justice. It is quite
conclusive. “Your day’s service at Shrewsbury,” says my lord, “hath a
little gilded over your night’s exploit at Gadshill.” Nothing can be
more satisfactory. The bravery of Falstaff was the talk of the town.
When peace has come, or that Sir John has received permission to
return home, on urgent private affairs, he enters a little into
dissipation, it is true. He is not, however, guilty of such excess as to
materially injure his health; otherwise his page would not have
brought him so satisfactory a message from his doctor. He may,
perhaps, be also open to the charge of being too easily taken by
such white bait as he might find in the muslin of Eastcheap. Heroes,
however, have usually very inflammable hearts. When Nelson was
ashore, he immediately fell in love.
In spite of a trifle of rioting, the overflowing of animal spirits, Falstaff
is governed by the laws of good society. Jokes are fired at him
incessantly, but he takes them with good-humor, and repays them
with interest. “I am not only witty in myself,” he says, “but the cause
that wit is in other men.” Gregoire and La Bruyere expressly define
the great rule of conversation to be that, while you exhibit your own
powers, you should endeavor to elicit and encourage those of your
companions. What they put down as a canon, Sir John had already,
and long before, put in excellent practice. He had wit enough to foil
the Chief Justice, but he left to his lordship ample opportunity to
exhibit his own ability; and then the compliment to the great judicial
dignitary, that he was not yet clean past his youth, although he had
in him some relish of the saltness of time—this, combined with the
benevolent recommendation that his lordship would have a reverend
care of his health, robs the latter personage of any prejudice he
might have entertained against the knight. Indeed, it would be
difficult to conceive how the religiously-minded Lord Chief Justice
could have entertained prejudice against a gallant old gentleman
who had lost his voice with “hollaing” (his men to the charge), “and
singing of anthems.”
Brave! there can be no question touching his bravery. And if he does
really rust a little at home, and impose a little upon the weakness of
the Hostess and other ladies, whom he weekly woos to marry, and
who find his gallantry and saucy promises irresistible; he is ever
ready for service. He does not look for unlimited absence from
scenes of danger. If he led his company of three hundred and a half
to death, and comes out scot-free himself, he is by no means
prepared to hang about town, inactive for the remainder of the
campaign. When he is appointed on perilous enterprise with Prince
John of Lancaster, he simply remarks, with a complacency which is
doubtless warranted by truth, “There is not a dangerous action can
peep out his head, but I am thrust upon it. Well, I can not last for
ever;” and, with this remark buckled on to some satirical wit which he
points at the Lord Chief Justice, he sets forth cheerily on his mission,
the gout in his toe, and in his purse not more than seven groats and
twopence. He has a rouse and a riot at the Boar’s Head before he
starts; but nothing more disreputable seems to have occurred than
one might hear of at a modern club, before some old naval lion is
hiccupped on to deeds of daring. Besides, the knight is no hypocrite;
and he will not be accounted virtuous, like many of his
contemporaries, by “making courtesy and saying nothing.” Not, on
the other hand, that even in his moments of jolly relaxation, he would
be unseemly noisy. He can troll a merry catch, but, as he says to a
vulgarly roystering blade, “Pistol, I would be quiet.” It has been
thought unseemly that he should quarrel with and even roughly
chastise the “ancient” with whom he had been on such very intimate
terms. But such things happen in the best society. At the famous
Reform Club dinner, Sir James gave permission to Sir Charles to go
and make war; but, since that time, Sir Charles, with words, instead
of rapiers, has been poking his iron into the ribs of Sir James, after
the fashion of Falstaff and Pistol.
And so, as I have said, Sir John girds him for the battle. If he did in
his youth, hear the chimes at midnight, in company with Master
Shallow, the lean, but light-living barrister of Clement’s Inn, he did
not waste his vigor. So great indeed is his renown for this, and for
the bravery which accompanies it, that no sooner does the doughty
Sir John Colville of the Dale meet him in single combat, than Colville
at once surrenders. The very idea of such a hero being face to face
with him impels him to give up his sword at once. “I think you are Sir
John Falstaff, and in that thought yield me.” Was ever greater
compliment paid to mortal hero?
Of this achievement Prince John most ungenerously says, that it was
more the effect of Colville’s courtesy than Falstaff’s deserving. But,
as the latter remarks, the young sober-blooded boy of a prince does
not love the knight; and “that’s no marvel,” exclaims Falstaff, “he
drinks no wine.” The teetotaler of those days disparaged the deeds
of a man who increased the sum of his country’s glory. He was like a
sour Anglo-Quaker, sneering down the merit of a Crimean soldier.
We do not, however, go so far as Falstaff in his enthusiasm, when he
exclaims that skill in the weapon is nothing without sack. There is
something in the remark, nevertheless, as there is when Sir John
subsequently says in reference to his wits suffering by coming in dull
contact with obtuse Shallow. “It is certain,” says he, “that either wise
bearing or ignorant carriage is caught, as men take diseases, one of
another; therefore let men take care of their company.” Victor Hugo
has manifestly condescended to plagiarize this sentiment, and has
said in one of his most remarkable works, that “On devient vieux à
force de regarder les vieux.”
And, to come to a conclusion, how unworthily is this gallant soldier,
merry companion, and profound philosopher, treated at last by an old
associate, Prince Hal, when king. Counting on the sacredness of
friendship, Sir John had borrowed from Master Shallow a thousand
pounds. He depended upon being able to repay it out of the new
monarch’s liberality, but when he salutes the sovereign—very
inopportunely, I confess—the latter, with a cold-hearted and
shameless ingratitude, declares that he does not know the never-to-
be-forgotten speaker. King Henry V. does indeed promise—
“For competence of life, I will allow you;
That lack of moans enforce yon not to evil;”
and departs, after intimating that the knight must not reside within
ten miles of court, and that royal favor will be restored to the
banished man, if merit authorize it.
“Be it your charge, my lord, to see performed the tenor of our word,”
says the King to the Chief Justice; and Falstaff, though sorely
wounded in feelings, is still not without hope. But see what a royal
word, or what this royal word is! The Monarch has no sooner passed
on his way, than the Chief Justice fulfils its meaning, by ordering Sir
John Falstaff and all his company to be close-confined in the Fleet!
The great dignitary does this with as much hurried glee as we may
conjecture Lord Campbell would have had, in rendering the same
service to Miss Agnes Strickland, when the latter accused the judge
of stealing her story of Queen Eleanor of Provence.
However this may be, the royal ingratitude broke the proud heart in
the bosom of Sir John. He took to his bed, and never smiled again.
“The King has killed his heart,” is the bold assertion of Dame Quickly,
at a time when such an assertion might have cost her her liberty, if
not her life. How edifying too was his end! He did not “babble o’
green fields.” Mr. Collier has proved this, to the satisfaction of all
Exeter Hall, who would deem such light talk trifling. But he died
arguing against “the whore of Babylon,” which should make him find
favor even with Dr. Cumming, for it is a proof of the knight’s
Protestantism—and “Would I were with him,” exclaims honest
lieutenant Bardolph, with more earnestness than reverence—“Would
I were with him, wheresome’er he is; either in heaven or in hell.” If
this has a profane ring in it, let us think of the small education and
the hard life of him who uttered it. There was more profanity and
terrible blasphemy to boot, in the assertion of Prince Menschikoff,
after the death of the Czar Nicholas, namely, “that his late august
master might be seen in the skies blessing his armies on their way to
victory!” Decidedly, I prefer Bardolph to Menschikoff, and Falstaff to
both.
I am sorry that Queen Elizabeth had the bad taste to request
Shakespeare to represent “Falstaff in love.” The result is only an
Adelphi farce in five acts; in which the author, after all, has made the
knight far more respectable than that sorry fool, Ford. The “Wives”
themselves are not much stronger in virtue than Dorothea of
Eastcheap, unless Sir John himself was mistaken in them. Of Mrs.
Ford, who holds her husband’s purse-strings, he says, “I can
construe the action of her familiar style,” and he tells us what that
manner was, pretty distinctly. When he writes to Mrs. Page, he
notices a common liking which exists in both, in the words, “You love
sack, and so do I.” The “Wives,” for mere mischief’s sake, we will
say, tempted the gallant old soldier. In their presence he had left off
swearing, praised woman’s modesty, and gave such orderly and
well-behaved reproof to all uncomeliness, that Mrs. Page thought,
perhaps, that drinking sack, and, in company with Mrs. Ford, talking
familiarly with him, would not tempt him to turn gallant toward them.
This consequence did follow; and then the sprightly Wives, in place
of bidding their ridiculous husbands cudgel him, come to the
conclusion that “the best way was to entertain him with hope,” till his
wickedly raised fire should have “melted him in his own grease.” A
dangerous process, ladies, depend upon it!
Then, what a sorry cur is that Master Ford who puts Falstaff upon
the way to seduce his own wife! Had other end come of it than what
did result, is there a jury even in Gotham, that would have awarded
Ford a farthing’s-worth of separation. Falstaff is infinitely more
refined than Ford or Page. Neither of these noodles could have paid
such sparkling compliments as the knight pays to the lady. “Let the
court of France show me such another! I see how thine eyes would
emulate the diamond; thou hast the right-arched bent of the brow,
that becomes the ship-tire, the tire-valiant, or any tire of Venetian
admittance!” Why this is a prose Anacreontic! And if the speaker of it
could offend once, he did not merit to be allured again by hope to a
greater punishment than he had endured for his first offence.
For one of the great characteristics of Falstaff is his own sense of
seemliness. When he was nearly drowned by being tossed from the
buck-basket into the river, his prevalent and uneasy idea was, how
disgusting he should look if he were to swell—a mountain of
mummy! The Mantelini of Mr. Dickens borrowed from Falstaff this
aversion to a “demmed damp body.” It is not pleasant!
Once again, Sir John, though he could err, yet he was ashamed of
his offence. Otherwise, would he have confessed, as he did, when
recounting how the mock fairies had tormented him, “I was three or
four times in the thought they were not fairies, but the guiltiness of
my mind, the sudden surprise of my powers drove the grossness of
the foppery into a received belief.” How exquisitely is this said! How
does it raise the knight above the broad farce of most of the other
characters! How infinitely superior is he to the two dolts of husbands
who, after hearing the confession of guilty intention against the honor
of their wives, invite him to spend a jolly evening in company with
themselves and the ladies. And so they—
This may be accounted too gross for probability; but worse than this
is in the memory of our yet surviving fathers. There was, within such
a memory, a case tried before Sir Elijah Impey, in which Talleyrand
was the defendant, against whom a husband brought an action, the
great statesman having robbed him of his wife. The action was
brought to the ordinary issue; and a few weeks subsequently,
plaintiff, defendant, judge, and lady, dined together in the Prince’s
residence at Paris.
Of Stage Falstaffs, Quin, according to all accounts, must have been
the best, provided only that he had a sufficiency of claret in him, and
the house an overflowing audience. Charles Kemble, I verily believe,
must have been the worst of stage Falstaffs. At least, having seen
him in the character, I can conscientiously assert that I can not
imagine a poorer Sir John. He dressed the character well; but as for
its “flavor,” it was as if you had the two oyster-shells, minus the fat
and juicy oyster. What a galaxy of actors have shined or essayed to
shine in this joyous but difficult part! In Charles the Second’s days,
Cartwright and Lacy, by their acting in the first part of Henry IV.,
made Shakespeare popular, when the fashion at Court was against
him. Betterton acted the same part in 1700, at Lincoln’s Inn Fields
and the Haymarket. Four years later, he played the Knight in the
“Merry Wives;” and in 1730, at Drury Lane, he and Mills took the part
alternately, and set dire dissension among the play-goers, as to their
respective merits.
Popular as Betterton was in this character, after he had grown too
stout for younger heroes, his manner of playing it was not original;
and his imitation was at second-hand. Ben Jonson had seen it
played in Dublin by Baker, a stone-mason. He was so pleased with
the representation, that he described the manner of it, on his return
to London, to Betterton, who, docile and modest as usual,
acknowledged that the mason’s conception was better than his own,
and adopted the Irish actor’s manner, accordingly.
Chetwood does not tell us how Baker played, but he shows us how
he studied, namely in the streets, while overlooking the men who
worked under him. “One day, two of his men who were newly come
to him, and were strangers to his habits, observing his countenance,
motion, gesture, and his talking to himself, imagined their master
was mad. Baker, seeing them neglect their work to stare at him, bid
them, in a hasty manner, mind their business. The fellows went to
work again, but still with an eye to their master. The part Baker was
rehearsing was Falstaff; and when he came to the scene where Sir
Walter Blunt was supposed to be lying dead on the stage, gave a
look at one of his new paviors, and with his eye fixed upon him,
muttered loud enough to be heard, ‘Who have we here? Sir Walter
Blunt! There’s honor for you.’ The fellow who was stooping, rose on
the instant, and with the help of his companion, bound poor Baker
hand and foot, and assisted by other people no wiser than
themselves, they carried him home in that condition, with a great
mob at their heels.”
Estcourt’s Falstaff was flat and trifling, yet with a certain
waggishness. That of Harper was droll, but low and coarse. The
Falstaff of Evans seems to have been in the amorous scenes, as
offensive as Dowton in Major Sturgeon; and the humor was
misplaced. Accordingly, when we read in old Anthony Aston, that
“Betterton wanted the waggery of Estcourt, the drollery of Harper,
and the lasciviousness of Jack Evans,” we are disposed to imagine
that his Falstaff was none the worse for this trial of wants.
Throughout the eighteenth century, the character did not lack brilliant
actors. In the first part of Henry IV., Mills played the character, at
Drury, in 1716. Booth had previously played it for one night, in
presence of Queen Anne. Bullock filled Lincoln’s Inn Fields Theatre,
with it, in 1721. Quin, in 1738, used to play the character in the two
parts of Henry IV. on successive nights, and eight years later his
Falstaff attracted crowds to “the Garden.” Barry played it against him
at Drury, in 1743 and 1747; but Barry was dull and void of impulse as
a school-boy repeating his task. In 1762, the part, at Drury, fell to
Yates, for whom the piece was brought out, with the character of
Hotspur omitted! To give more prominence to our knight, a scene
was left out. The public did not approve of the plan, for in the same
year Love, celebrated by Churchill for his humor, made his first
appearance at Drury, as Sir John, when Holland, the baker of
Chiswick, played Hotspur, with well-bred warmth. I will add, that
though Quin drew immense houses, yet when Harper, some years
previously, played the same part at Drury, with Booth in Hotspur,
Wilks as the Prince, and Cibber as Glendower, the combined
excellence drew as great houses for a much longer period. So that
Harper’s Falstaff, although inferior to Quin’s, was, as was remarked,
more seen, yet less admired by the town. Shuter played it almost too
“jollily” at the Garden, in 1774. But all other Falstaffs were
extinguished for a time, when Henderson, although not physically
qualified for the part, astonished the town with his “old boy of the
castle,” in 1777 at the Haymarket, and delighted them two years
later, at Covent Garden. At the latter house, eight years
subsequently, Ryder played it respectably, to Lewis’s Prince of
Wales; and in 1791, when the Drury Lane company were playing at
the Haymarket, Palmer represented Falstaff, and John Kemble mis-
represented Hotspur. King tried the knight at the same “little house,”
in 1792, but King, clever as he was, was physically incapable of
representing Falstaff, and he soon ceased to pretend to do so. The
next representative was the worst the world had yet seen—namely,
Fawcett, who first attempted it at the Garden, in 1795. Blisset
appeared in it in 1803, and disappeared also. From this time no new
actor tried the Sir John, in the first part of Henry IV., till 1824, when
Charles Kemble made the Ghost of Shakespeare very uneasy, by
executing a part for which he was totally unfit. He persevered,
however, but the success of Elliston in the part, two years later,
settled the respective merits of two performers, to the advantage of
Robert William, as effectually as Grisi showed the town that there
was but one Norma, by playing it the night after the fatal attempt
made on the Druidess, by Jenny Lind.
The succession of actors who represented Falstaff, in the second
part of Henry IV., was as brilliant as that of the line of representatives
above noticed. Ten years after Betterton and Mills, in 1720, we have
Harper, and it is somewhat singular that when Mills resigned Falstaff
to Harper, he took the part of the King. Hulett, two years
subsequently played it at Covent Garden; and, after another two
years, Quin made Drury ecstatic with his fun. He held the part
without a real rival, and fifteen years later, in 1749, he was as
attractive as ever in this portion of the knight’s character, at Covent
Garden. Shuter succeeded him in the part at this theatre, in 1755;
but in 1758, all London, that is the play-goers of London, might be
seen hurrying once more to Drury, to witness lively Woodward’s very
old Falstaff played to Garrick’s King. The Garden can not be said to
have found a superior means of attraction, when Shuter again
represented Sir John, at the Garden, in 1761, on which occasion the
parts of Shallow and Silence were omitted! The object, however, was
to shorten the piece, and the main attraction was in the coronation
pageant, at the conclusion, in honor of the then young King and
Queen, who were well worthy of the honor thus paid to them.
Love and Holland, who played Falstaff and Hotspur, at Drury Lane,
in 1762, played the Knight and the Prince of Wales, at the same
house, two years subsequently. Nine years after this, the Garden
found a Prince in Mrs. Lessingham, Shuter played Falstaff to her, but
the travesty of the former character was only in a slight degree less
incongruous than that made by Mrs. Glover, in the present century,
who once, if not twice, played the fat knight, for her own benefit. For