Wachirawit 6577770906

Supanich

slope

d) Birth Weight 120 07-1 93 x

parity
=
. .

b) The slope of -1 .
93 = birth weight decrease
by 1 93.

For first-born 2
parity 0)
·
:

120 . 07 -

1 93 X8
. = 120 07
.
sunces

For other-born 2
parily 1)
·
:

120 . 07 -

1 93X1
. : 198 14 . Ounces

1) Yes
,
there
indicated by the
is a
statisti(0cally significant relationship between the average birth
weight
that
and
the effect
parityI I
as

of
p-value .
1052)
being greater than 0 05.

suggesting
,

birth statistically significant at conventional lvs significant.

parity on
weight is not of

a) False If credictors are collinear, consignificantly influence the estimate another

,
I removing one variable
point of

crefficent. This is because inflates to unstable coefficient estimates.

collinarity
variables SD -

leading
b) False . for the be
The
predict value second observation will not necessarily 25 .

higher
than first observation: b7 :
2 . 5
represent the change in the dependent variables for a one unit
the independent the for the second
predicdue
tion
change in variable ,
but it doesn't mean observation
the other
will always be
exactly 25
higher than the first observation
predictor's influ.

6) True If the officient for the first variables

,
is bi =
5 .
7, then for every one unit increase in X 1.

value of will increase predictors constant.

The
predicted y by 5 7.

units , assuming all other remain

d) False slight skewness in the distribution of residuals without extreme outliners I doesn't automatically
, ,

disqualify multiple regression model More advance method might be considered if there are severe
a .

if the model's performance

violations of
regression assumption is
poor or
.