Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Current Science Paper
Current Science Paper
Current Science Paper
Table 2. Results from F-1 inbreed and backcrosses of F-1 with B. sphaericus resistant and susceptible strains of An. stephensi
receptors of larval midgut brush border 3. Kumar, A., Sharma, V. P., Sumodan, P. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. Assistance provi-
membrane in the resistant strain of Cx. K., Thavaselvam, D. and Kamat, R. H., ded by Sh. Brij Mohan and Sh. Rajender Singh
quinquefasciatus10. Both these toxins re- J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc., 1994, 10, is acknowledged.
quire only single class of receptors, one 535–539.
4. Mittal, P. K., J. Vector Borne Dis., 2003,
helping in binding and the other perform-
40, 20–32. Received 4 April 2005; accepted 28 April 2005
ing toxic actions11. 5. Mittal, P. K., Adak, T. and Sharma, V.
Bioassay tests with Bt H-14 against 3rd P., Indian J. Malariol., 1993, 30, 37–41.
instar larvae of B. sphaericus resistant and 6. Mittal, P. K., Adak, T., Batra, C. P. and
susceptible strains of An. stephensi gave Sharma, V. P., Indian J. Malariol., 1993, P. K. MITTAL1,*
LC50 values of 0.117 and 0.136 mg/l. 30, 81–90. T. ADAK1
These results show that resistance to B. 7. Adak, T., Mittal, P. K., Raghavendra, K., S. K. SUBBARAO2,3
sphaericus in An. stephensi does not show Subbarao, S. K., Ansari, M. A. and
any cross-resistance to Bt, probably be- Sharma, V. P., Curr. Sci., 1995, 69, 695–
1
698. Malaria Research Centre,
cause of the different modes of action of
8. Mittal, P. K., Adak, T. and Sharma, V. 2, Nanak Enclave,
two the bacterial toxins12. Thus in case of
P., Indian J. Malariol., 1998, 35, 178–183. Radio Colony,
B. sphaericus resistance, Bt can be used 9. Aslamkhan, M., Pak. J. Zool., 1973, 5, Delhi 110 009, India
to control the resistant mosquito larvae. 127–130. 2
Malaria Research Centre,
10. Nielsen-Leroux, C., Charles, J. F., 22, Sham Nath Marg,
1. Indranil, K., Eapen, A., Ravindran, K. J., Thiery, I. and Georghiou, G. P., Eur. J.
Chandrahas, P. K., Appavoo, N. C., Sada-
Delhi 110 054, India
Biochem., 1995, 228, 206–210. 3
nand, A. V. and Dhanraj, B., Indian J. 11. Baumann, P., Clark, M. A., Baumann, L. Present address:
Malariol., 1997, 34, 25–36. and Broadwell, A. H., Microbiol. Rev., Indian Council of Medical Research,
2. Kumar, A., Sharma, V. P., Thavaselvam, 1991, 55, 425–436. New Delhi 110 029, India
D. and Sumodan, P. K., J. Am. Mosq. 12. Porter, A. G., Parasitol. Today, 1996, 12, *For correspondence.
Contr. Assoc., 1995, 11, 86–89. 175–179. e-mail: pk_mittal52@yahoo.co.in
Figure 1. Cluster analysis of wild rice accessions and rice cultivars based on their reaction to M. grisea isolates. Cophenetic correlation coeffi-
cient (r) of the dendrogram is 0.95. ‘–’, All the lines of the cluster show incompatible reaction with given M. grisea isolate; ‘+’, All or few lines of
the cluster show compatible reaction with given M. grisea isolate.
pared to cultivated rice. Resistance speci- novel. We report here, results on explor- genetic base for blast resistance in culti-
ficities in wild rice must be evolving in- ing the possibility of identifying novel vated rice. O. rufipogon accessions col-
dependently even after domestication of resistance specificities in O. rufipogon lected from different regions of HP,
cultivated rice, and therefore these could be types for eventual diversification of the together with five elite rice cultivars as
Isolate no.
Virulence
Genotype/isolate no. Pg-1 Pg-2 Pg-3 Pg-4 Pg-5 Pg-6 Pg-7 Pg-8 Pg-9 Pg-10 frequency (%)
Oryza rufipogon
WRA-1 4 4 4 0 4 0 5 4 5 4 80
WRA-2 5 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 90
WRA-3 4 4 1 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 80
WRA-4 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 40
WRA-5 4 0 2 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 20
WRA-6 4 4 5 0 4 4 5 4 4 4 90
WRA-7 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 90
WRA-8 4 1 4 3 0 4 4 4 1 0 50
WRA-9 4 4 0 4 5 4 4 4 0 2 70
WRA-10 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 70
WRA-11 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 90
WRA-12 0 – 2 0 0 4 0 3 4 0 22
WRA-13 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 30
WRA-14 0 5 1 4 4 4 2 0 4 0 50
WRA-15 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 3 0 70
WRA-16 4 – 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 100
WRA-17 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 80
WRA-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WRA-19 4 4 0 0 4 5 4 4 0 0 60
WRA-20 4 4 2 4 0 3 4 4 0 0 50
WRA-21 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0
WRA-22 4 4 4 5 5 0 4 0 4 4 80
WRA-23 4 4 3 4 4 1 0 0 4 4 60
WRA-24 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 0 0 0 60
WRA-25 0 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 80
WRA-26 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 100
WRA-27 0 3 4 0 4 1 4 0 3 4 40
WRA-28 4 0 4 0 4 4 4 4 0 4 70
WRA-29 0 4 0 – 4 5 4 4 0 0 56
WRA-30 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 4 80
WRA-31 1 4 0 2 0 4 3 0 0 4 30
WRA-32 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 30
WRA-33 4 4 0 4 4 4 3 4 4 0 70
WRA-34 4 4 0 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 70
WRA-35 4 4 2 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 70
WRA-36 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 70
WRA-37 4 – 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 5 67
WRA-38 4 – 0 4 5 4 4 4 2 4 78
WRA-39 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 90
WRA-40 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 5 4 4 90
WRA-41 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 90
WRA-42 0 5 0 0 4 3 4 4 4 4 60
WRA-43 0 4 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 70
WRA-44 0 4 0 2 4 4 4 0 0 4 50
WRA-45 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 40
WRA-46 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 4 4 0 40
WRA-47 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 1 0 0 40
WRA-48 0 0 2 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 30
WRA-49 4 5 4 0 4 4 4 0 4 4 80
WRA-50 0 4 0 2 4 4 0 2 5 4 50
WRA-51 4 4 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 60
WRA-52 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 40
WRA-53 4 0 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 4 30
Oryza sativa
China-988 4 – 1 0 0 4 1 4 0 2 33.33
Himdhan 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 40
HPU-741 5 1 4 2 4 0 4 4 0 0 50
Palamdhan-957 4 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 2 30
R575 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100
Himalaya-2 4 0 0 2 4 0 4 4 3 0 40
a
Computed as percentage of total isolates that produce compatible reaction (reaction type 4–5) on a given genotype; ‘–’, reaction not determined.