Current Science Paper

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

Table 2. Results from F-1 inbreed and backcrosses of F-1 with B. sphaericus resistant and susceptible strains of An. stephensi

No. of larvae/families No. of larvae alive No. of larvae dead


Cross no. exposed to B. sphaericus after 48 h (expected*) after 48 h (expected*) χ2

1 R/S R/S 1016/7 243 (254) 773 (762) 0.2034**


2 S/R S/R 1139/8 287 (285) 852 (855) 0.001**
3 R/S R/R 1338/9 658 (669) 680 (669) 0.027**
4 R/R R/S 1420/11 704 (710) 716 (710) 0.0071**
5 R/S S/S 1551/12 0 (0) 1551 (1551) 0
6 S/S R/S 1297/11 0 (0) 1297 (1297) 0

R, B. sphaericus resistant; S, B. sphaericus susceptible.


*, Based on the hypothesis that resistance is due to a single major factor, expected number of larvae that would die at a concentra-
tion of 40 mg/l within 48 h.
**, Not significant (P > 0.05).

receptors of larval midgut brush border 3. Kumar, A., Sharma, V. P., Sumodan, P. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. Assistance provi-
membrane in the resistant strain of Cx. K., Thavaselvam, D. and Kamat, R. H., ded by Sh. Brij Mohan and Sh. Rajender Singh
quinquefasciatus10. Both these toxins re- J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc., 1994, 10, is acknowledged.
quire only single class of receptors, one 535–539.
4. Mittal, P. K., J. Vector Borne Dis., 2003,
helping in binding and the other perform-
40, 20–32. Received 4 April 2005; accepted 28 April 2005
ing toxic actions11. 5. Mittal, P. K., Adak, T. and Sharma, V.
Bioassay tests with Bt H-14 against 3rd P., Indian J. Malariol., 1993, 30, 37–41.
instar larvae of B. sphaericus resistant and 6. Mittal, P. K., Adak, T., Batra, C. P. and
susceptible strains of An. stephensi gave Sharma, V. P., Indian J. Malariol., 1993, P. K. MITTAL1,*
LC50 values of 0.117 and 0.136 mg/l. 30, 81–90. T. ADAK1
These results show that resistance to B. 7. Adak, T., Mittal, P. K., Raghavendra, K., S. K. SUBBARAO2,3
sphaericus in An. stephensi does not show Subbarao, S. K., Ansari, M. A. and
any cross-resistance to Bt, probably be- Sharma, V. P., Curr. Sci., 1995, 69, 695–
1
698. Malaria Research Centre,
cause of the different modes of action of
8. Mittal, P. K., Adak, T. and Sharma, V. 2, Nanak Enclave,
two the bacterial toxins12. Thus in case of
P., Indian J. Malariol., 1998, 35, 178–183. Radio Colony,
B. sphaericus resistance, Bt can be used 9. Aslamkhan, M., Pak. J. Zool., 1973, 5, Delhi 110 009, India
to control the resistant mosquito larvae. 127–130. 2
Malaria Research Centre,
10. Nielsen-Leroux, C., Charles, J. F., 22, Sham Nath Marg,
1. Indranil, K., Eapen, A., Ravindran, K. J., Thiery, I. and Georghiou, G. P., Eur. J.
Chandrahas, P. K., Appavoo, N. C., Sada-
Delhi 110 054, India
Biochem., 1995, 228, 206–210. 3
nand, A. V. and Dhanraj, B., Indian J. 11. Baumann, P., Clark, M. A., Baumann, L. Present address:
Malariol., 1997, 34, 25–36. and Broadwell, A. H., Microbiol. Rev., Indian Council of Medical Research,
2. Kumar, A., Sharma, V. P., Thavaselvam, 1991, 55, 425–436. New Delhi 110 029, India
D. and Sumodan, P. K., J. Am. Mosq. 12. Porter, A. G., Parasitol. Today, 1996, 12, *For correspondence.
Contr. Assoc., 1995, 11, 86–89. 175–179. e-mail: pk_mittal52@yahoo.co.in

Oryza rufipogon: A possible source of novel resistance specificities


against rice blast (Magnaporthe grisea)
Blast disease caused by Magnaporthe pool of Oryza represent a potential source one of the centres of diversity of cultivated
grisea is a serious production constraint of easily transferable novel pest and disease rice4. This region abounds in diversity of
for rice world wide. In the past, rice breeders resistance2. Among the most successful wild rice varieties identified as types
have successfully tapped sources of resis- examples of utilization of wild germ- within wild rice O. rufipogon, which is
tance available in cultivated rice germ- plasm in rice resistance breeding has believed to be the progenitor of Asian
plasm for developing disease-resistant been the use of gene(s) of an accession of cultivated rice (O. sativa)5.
varieties. To date more than 40 genes O. nivara from northwestern Himalayas, Since, O. rufipogon – M. grisea patho-
conferring resistance to blast have been to provide long-lasting resistance to grassy system has a long co-evolutionary history
identified from cultivated rice lines1. Be- stunt virus3. The hilly state of Himachal than the O. sativa – M. grisea system, we
sides the cultivated types, the wild and Pradesh (HP), representing the north- believe considerable diversity for R-genes
weedy species within the primary gene western Himalayan region of India, is must have evolved in the wild rice com-

CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 89, NO. 3, 10 AUGUST 2005 443


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE
Table 1. Geographic origin of 53 accessions of wild rice (Oryza rufipogon) from Himachal Pradesh

Place of collection Sample size Accession no.


Bodal 11 WRA-1, WRA-2, WRA-3, WRA-4, WRA-5, WRA-6, WRA-7, WRA-8, WRA-9, WRA-10, WRA-11
Chauntra 3 WRA-12, WRA-13, WRA-14
Chimbalhar 2 WRA-15, WRA-16
Gorta 1 WRA-17
Kukaina 1 WRA-18,
Lahad 2 WRA-19, WRA-20
Lunapani 1 WRA-21
Mahakal 3 WRA-22, WRA-23, WRA-24
Mehnja 2 WRA-25, WRA-26
Nagrota 3 WRA-27, WRA-28, WRA-29
Panchrukhi 3 WRA-30, WRA-31, WRA-32
Paprola 3 WRA-33, WRA-34, WRA-35
Rani Sidhpur 3 WRA-36, WRA-37, WRA-38
Salyana 3 WRA-39, WRA-40, WRA-41
Sulah 5 WRA-42, WRA-43, WRA-44, WRA-45, WRA-46
Unknown 2 WRA-47, WRA-48
Kunsal 1 WRA-49
Usterh 4 WRA-50, WRA-51, WRA-52, WRA-53

Incompatabiltiy of all the lines of cluster with blast isolates


Cluster No of isolates to
WRA-1 which the lines of
WRA-2 the cluster are Pg-1 Pg-2 Pg-3 Pg-4 Pg-5 Pg-6 Pg-7 Pg-8 Pg-9 Pg-10
WRA-6
WRA-7 resistant
WRA-41
WRA-16
R-575
WRA-26
WRA-39
WRA-40
I
WRA-22
WRA-49 0-2 + + + + + + + + + +
WRA-17
WRA-25
WRA -3
WRA-11
WRA-33
WRA-34
WRA-35
WRA-23
II 1-4 + + + + + + + + + +
WRA-24
WRA-30
WRA-9
WRA-10
WRA-15
WRA-19
WRA-29
WRA-37
III 2-5 + + - + + + + + - +
WRA-38
WRA-20
WRA-36
WRA-42
WRA-43
WRA-45
WRA-46 IV 3-6 + + - + + + + + + +
WRA-51
WRA-4
WRA-31
WRA-32
WRA-50
WRA-12
WRA-44 V
WRA-13
WRA-14
WRA-53
5-7 + + + + + + + + + +
China-988
WRA-52
WRA-5
WRA-18
WRA-21
Palmadhan-957 VI 6-10 + - - + + - + - + -
WRA-47
Himdhan
WRA-48
WRA-8
WRA-28
HPU-741
+ - + - + + + + - +
Himalaya-2
WRA-27 VII 3-6
0.25
0.25 0.50
0.50 0.75
0.75 1.0
1.00
Similarity(%)

Figure 1. Cluster analysis of wild rice accessions and rice cultivars based on their reaction to M. grisea isolates. Cophenetic correlation coeffi-
cient (r) of the dendrogram is 0.95. ‘–’, All the lines of the cluster show incompatible reaction with given M. grisea isolate; ‘+’, All or few lines of
the cluster show compatible reaction with given M. grisea isolate.

pared to cultivated rice. Resistance speci- novel. We report here, results on explor- genetic base for blast resistance in culti-
ficities in wild rice must be evolving in- ing the possibility of identifying novel vated rice. O. rufipogon accessions col-
dependently even after domestication of resistance specificities in O. rufipogon lected from different regions of HP,
cultivated rice, and therefore these could be types for eventual diversification of the together with five elite rice cultivars as

444 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 89, NO. 3, 10 AUGUST 2005


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE
control, were screened against M. grisea in 5 ml distilled water and plated onto leaf blades killed by coalescence of lesions.
isolates endemic to the region. Mathur’s medium6 for sporulation. After Genotypes exhibiting reaction types 0, 1,
A total of 53 O. rufipogon accessions 8 to 10 days of incubation at 25 ± 1°C, 2 and 3 were rated as resistant, while those
numbered WRA-1 to WRA-53, were col- plates were washed with 10 ml distilled showing reaction types 4 and 5 were con-
lected from 18 rice-growing localities of water to make a spore suspension. Each sidered susceptible.
HP (Table 1). For each accession, seeds spore suspension was filtered through Cluster analysis of the lines based on
were collected from a single panicle and two layers of muslin cloth and the spore their reaction to ten M. grisea isolates
stored at 50°C for 5 days to break the concentration was adjusted to 40–50 co- was done using the NTSYS-pc package8.
dormancy. Seeds of all the accessions nidia per microscopic field (40x). About A binary matrix of resistance spectrum
and six elite rice cultivars, China-988, 30–40 ml of the spore suspension con- of lines based upon their reaction to 10
Himalaya-2, Himdhan, HPU-741, Palm- taining Tween-20 (0.2%) was sprayed M. grisea isolates was constructed by
dhan-957, and R-575 were sown in plastic onto 15-day-old seedlings using a glass coding resistance as ‘1’ and susceptibility
trays (20 × 15 × 4 cm) filled with potting atomizer. Inoculated seedlings were kept as ‘0’. The binary matrix was then used
mixture (soil : sand :: 3 : 1). Two rows of in a humidity chamber maintained at 25 ± to derive a similarity matrix based on the
seeds of each line were planted in each 1°C for 24 h and thereafter sprayed three simple matching coefficient (SM = m/n,
tray using 5–6 seeds per hill and trays to four times a day with distilled water to where m is the total number of isolates to
were kept in a greenhouse at 25 ± 1°C maintain high humidity. Disease reaction which two lines in a pair are resistant or
for 15 days. All the lines were tested of each line was recorded 6 days after susceptible, and n is the total number of
twice against each isolate and for a few inoculation using a 0–5 disease scoring isolates) using the SIMQUAL program
lines showing ambiguous reactions, the scale7, i.e. 0, No evidence of infection; 1, of the NTSYS-pc package. To test the
experiments were repeated until consis- Brown specks smaller than 0.5 mm in dia- phenetic robustness of the dendrogram,
tent reactions were obtained. meter, no sporualtion; 2, Brown specks cophenetic correlation coefficient (r) was
Ten M. grisea isolates of varied viru- about 0.5–1.0 mm in diameter, no sporu- computed by comparing the similarity
lence spectrum were collected from rice lation; 3, Roundish to elliptical lesions matrix with cophenetic matrix using ma-
blast screening nursery, sown with lines 1–3 mm in diameter, grey centre sur- trix comparison (MXCOMP) program of
of different resistance specificities (Table 2). rounded by brown margins; 4, Typical NTSYS-pc package.
Single spore cultures of the isolates were spindle-shaped blast lesions capable of The virulence frequency of M. grisea
established on oatmeal agar. Mycelia sporulation, 3 mm or longer in diameter; on different wild rice accessions ranged
from ten-day-old slants were macerated 5, Lesions as in 4, but about half of 1–2 from 0 to 100%, while on cultivated rice
genotypes 33.33–100% of the isolates
were virulent (Table 3). Cluster analysis
Table 2. Origin of M. grisea isolates used in the study of virulence data generated a dendrogram
with high cophenetic correlation coefficient
Isolate no. Rice genotype of origin Resistance gene(s) reported in the host genotype
(r = 0.95), thus substantiating the robust-
Pg-1 Unknown ? ness of the dendrogram. On the basis of
Pg-2 Dular Pi-ka+? their resistance spectrum, all the lines
Pg-3 Himalaya-799 ? were grouped into seven clusters (I–VII)
Pg-4 C102 PKT Pi-4a (Figure 1). The constituent lines of dif-
Pg-5 HPU-741 ? ferent clusters were effective against 0 to
Pg-6 Sha-tiao-tsao Pi-ks 10 pathogen isolates. Genotypes falling
Pg-7 Himalaya-2 ?
in cluster I were least effective against the
Pg-8 C101A51 Pi-2
pathogen population as the constituent
Pg-9 Usen Pi-a+?
Pg-10 Zenith Pi-z, Pi-a, Pi-i lines were resistant to only 0 to 2 isolates.
Local rice cultivar R-575 and two wild
? Unknown resistance gene(s). rice lines, WRA-16 and WRA-26 falling
in this cluster were susceptible to all the
isolates tested. Genotypes in clusters V
and VI exhibited the broadest resistance
spectrum, as individual lines of these
clusters were resistant to 5 to 7 and 6 to
10 isolates respectively. Two accessions
within the cluster VI, namely WRA-18
and WRA-21 collected from Kukaina and
Luna Pani, were resistant to all the iso-
lates tested. Interestingly, these acces-
sions consistently exhibited ‘0’ and ‘2’
type reactions to all the pathogen isolates
(Figure 2). The wild rice accessions from
one location (Bodal) exhibited greater
Figure 2. Reaction of cultivated rice (HPU-741) and O. rufipogon accessions WRA-18 and diversity for blast resistance by exhibiting
WRA-21 to M. grisea. incompatibility with 1 to 8 isolates. These

CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 89, NO. 3, 10 AUGUST 2005 445


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE
Table 3. Virulence spectrum of rice limited isolates of M. grisea on wild rice (O. rufipogon) accessions and cultivated rice genotypes

Isolate no.
Virulence
Genotype/isolate no. Pg-1 Pg-2 Pg-3 Pg-4 Pg-5 Pg-6 Pg-7 Pg-8 Pg-9 Pg-10 frequency (%)
Oryza rufipogon
WRA-1 4 4 4 0 4 0 5 4 5 4 80
WRA-2 5 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 90
WRA-3 4 4 1 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 80
WRA-4 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 40
WRA-5 4 0 2 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 20
WRA-6 4 4 5 0 4 4 5 4 4 4 90
WRA-7 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 90
WRA-8 4 1 4 3 0 4 4 4 1 0 50
WRA-9 4 4 0 4 5 4 4 4 0 2 70
WRA-10 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 70
WRA-11 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 90
WRA-12 0 – 2 0 0 4 0 3 4 0 22
WRA-13 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 30
WRA-14 0 5 1 4 4 4 2 0 4 0 50
WRA-15 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 3 0 70
WRA-16 4 – 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 100
WRA-17 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 80
WRA-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WRA-19 4 4 0 0 4 5 4 4 0 0 60
WRA-20 4 4 2 4 0 3 4 4 0 0 50
WRA-21 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0
WRA-22 4 4 4 5 5 0 4 0 4 4 80
WRA-23 4 4 3 4 4 1 0 0 4 4 60
WRA-24 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 0 0 0 60
WRA-25 0 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 80
WRA-26 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 100
WRA-27 0 3 4 0 4 1 4 0 3 4 40
WRA-28 4 0 4 0 4 4 4 4 0 4 70
WRA-29 0 4 0 – 4 5 4 4 0 0 56
WRA-30 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 4 80
WRA-31 1 4 0 2 0 4 3 0 0 4 30
WRA-32 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 4 30
WRA-33 4 4 0 4 4 4 3 4 4 0 70
WRA-34 4 4 0 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 70
WRA-35 4 4 2 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 70
WRA-36 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 70
WRA-37 4 – 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 5 67
WRA-38 4 – 0 4 5 4 4 4 2 4 78
WRA-39 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 90
WRA-40 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 5 4 4 90
WRA-41 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 90
WRA-42 0 5 0 0 4 3 4 4 4 4 60
WRA-43 0 4 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 70
WRA-44 0 4 0 2 4 4 4 0 0 4 50
WRA-45 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 40
WRA-46 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 4 4 0 40
WRA-47 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 1 0 0 40
WRA-48 0 0 2 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 30
WRA-49 4 5 4 0 4 4 4 0 4 4 80
WRA-50 0 4 0 2 4 4 0 2 5 4 50
WRA-51 4 4 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 60
WRA-52 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 40
WRA-53 4 0 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 4 30
Oryza sativa
China-988 4 – 1 0 0 4 1 4 0 2 33.33
Himdhan 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 40
HPU-741 5 1 4 2 4 0 4 4 0 0 50
Palamdhan-957 4 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 4 2 30
R575 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100
Himalaya-2 4 0 0 2 4 0 4 4 3 0 40
a
Computed as percentage of total isolates that produce compatible reaction (reaction type 4–5) on a given genotype; ‘–’, reaction not determined.

446 CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 89, NO. 3, 10 AUGUST 2005


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE
results indicated that there is a great di- base for blast-resistance in rice. For ex- 6. Mathur, R. S., Barnett, H. L. and Lily, V.
versity for blast resistance in the native ample, wild rice accessions WRA-18 and G., Phytopathology, 1950, 40, 104–114.
O. rufipogon populations. WRA-21 exhibited broad resistance spec- 7. Mackill, D. J. and Bonman, J. M., Phyto-
Since the northwestern Himalayan re- trum to all the isolates tested, including pathology, 1992, 82, 746–749.
8. Rohlf, F. J., NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxo-
gion is one of the centres of diversity for Pg-1 that infects all the cultivated rice
nomy and Multivariate Analysis System
Oryza spp., a prolonged co-evolution of genotypes tested. Since O. rufipogon with Version 1.80. Exeter Software, Setauket,
host–pathogen coupled with mixed mating AA genome is sexually compatible with New York, 1993.
system of wild rice9, has probably enhan- cultivated rice, these two accessions can 9. Gao, L. Z. and Hong, S. G. D., Theor.
ced the diversity for resistance in the na- be used as potential donors of easily trans- Appl. Genet., 2000, 101, 494–502.
tive wild rice populations. The present ferable blast resistance in rice breeding 10. Rathour, R., Singh, B. M. and Sharma, T.
data also indicate that some wild rice varie- programmes. Further investigations on R., J. Phytopathol., 2004, 152, 304–312.
ties share common resistance specificities type of gene action and allelic relationship
with cultivated rice varieties. For example, of these resistance sources with already Received 23 November 2004; revised accep-
all the accessions in cluster VI, including known blast resistance genes that are ted 20 May 2005
cultivated rice genotypes, Palmdhan-957 highly effective against rice blast popula-
and Himdhan, shared common resistance tion of HP are urgently needed10.
specificities to pathogen isolates Pg2, R. RATHOUR1,*
Pg3, Pg6, Pg8 and Pg10. Likewise, all V. S. GAUR1
the accessions in cluster VII, that also 1. Nagato, Y. and Yashimura, A., Rice
R. P. KAUSHIK2
includes rice cultivars HPU-741 and Hima- Genet. Newsl., 1999, 16, 8–14. R. S. CHAUHAN1
laya-2, shared resistance specificities to 2. Li, R.B., Int. Rice Res. Notes, 1994, 19,
8–9. 1
isolates Pg2, Pg4 and Pg9. These com- Advanced Centre of Hill Bioresources
mon specificities could either be the re- 3. Plucknett, D. L., Smith, N. J. H., Williams, and Biotechnology,
J. T. and Anishetty, N. M., In Gene CSK H.P. Agricultural University,
sult of recent transfer from cultivated to
Banks and the World’s Food (eds Smith,
wild types or might be the relics of ancient Palampur 176 062, India
N. J. H., Williams, J. T. and Anishetty, 2
diversity that existed in cultivated rice since N. M.), Princeton University Press,
Regional Rice Research Station,
its domestication from wild rice. Never- Princeton, NJ, 1967, pp. 171–185. CSK H.P. Agricultural University,
theless, wild rice germplasm represents a 4. Sharma, R. D., Sci. Rep., 1998, 9–15. Malan 176 047, India
potential source of new blast-resistance 5. Khush, G. S., Plant Mol. Biol., 1997, 35, *For correspondence.
specificities for broadening the genetic 25–34. e-mail: rrathore@hillagric.org

Rapidly in vitro multiplied Drosera as reliable source for plumbagin


bioprospection
Drosera (Droseraceae) is the largest group which is difficult to obtain from natural Kondaparthi (Warangal); D. indica: Chel-
of insectivorous plants. It comprises of habitat. Hence, Drosera from the southern vaye (Warangal); Panchamatalu (Kurnool);
170 species and is cosmopolitan. All spe- hemisphere, such as D. indica, D. bur- Arakuvally (Visakhapatnam), Pakhal
cies of Drosera contain plumbagin (5- manii, D. peltata, D. ramentacea and D. lake (Warangal); Srisailam (Kurnool),
hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-napthoquinones) or madagascariensis is being exported to and D. burmanii: Motugudem (Khammam);
ramentaceone (7- methyljuglone) or both1,2. European countries7. In India D. indica L., Tirumala (Chitoor). Eriocoluan, Utricu-
Plumbagin exhibits a variety of therapeu- D. burmanii Vahl. and D. peltata J.E.Sm. laria and Sphagnum were the associated
tic functions such as anti-microbial, anti- ex Willd have been reported from differ- species in most of the investigated locations.
tuberculosis, bronchial infection, whooping ent parts. They are used as vital compo- The microhabitat in all these locations
cough, anti-asthma, antispasmodic, anti- nents in an Ayurvedic preparation called comprises wet slopes and poorly drained
cancer, enhances in vitro phagocytosis of ‘Swarnabhasma’ (Golden ash). Macera- rocky outcrops with sand and clay soils,
human granulocytes, antileprosy, antiferti- ted D. indica is used to remove corns and often with moss and peat. Urbanization,
lity, abortifacient, chitin synthetase inhibitor, has been categorized under vulnerable drought, agricultural pollutants, soil ero-
immunomodulator, cosmetic, aphrodisiac, medicinal plants8,9. sion, habitat conversion and fragmenta-
used against old age, arteriosclerosis, ex- We have collected D. indica and D. tion are the primary causes of threat.
tract used in certain sweets, antifeedant, burmanii from the following locations in We initiated research on Drosera as
anti-malarial, hyperglycaemic and other Andhra Pradesh (district name mentioned part of ex situ conservation and established
properties3–6. In European countries, in parenthesis) Gachibowli (Ranga Reddy), in vitro protocols for rapid multiplication.
Droseras is included in pharmacopoeias Narsapur (Medak), Anjodigadda (Visak- Shoots of D. indica and D. burmanii
and dried plants are marketed as ‘Herba hapatnam), Talakona (Chitoor), Tada were cultured on MS basal medium with
Droserae, Herba Drosera rotundifoliae’ (Nellore), Mulakanuru (Kharmnagar), 3% sucrose, 0.3% agar at pH 5.7. The

CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 89, NO. 3, 10 AUGUST 2005 447

You might also like