1. Explain the rights theory. - Rights theory says individuals have inherent rights that must be respected by society and governments. These rights can be natural (moral) or conventional (legal). Kant’s principle emphasizes that governments should create laws with good intentions to uphold these rights.
2. Differentiate a legal from a moral right.
- Legal rights are protected by law and exist within specific jurisdictions. Moral rights are inherent and universal, existing independently of legal systems.
3. Explain Kant's categorical imperative.
- Kant’s categorical imperative states that one should act only according to maxims that can be universally applied. It demands actions done out of duty, regardless of consequences.
4. Compare and contrast hypothetical and categorical imperatives.
- Hypothetical imperatives are conditional and based on achieving specific goals, like "If you want to pass, study hard." Categorical imperatives are unconditional and apply universally, like "Act in a way that your actions could become a universal law.” 5. Explain: "What is legal is not always moral." - This means that just because something is legal doesn't mean it is morally right. Legal rights are based on laws that may not always align with universal moral principles. Conversely, morally right actions might not be legally recognized.
On The Metaphysics of Morals and Ethics: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals; Introduction to the Metaphysic of Morals; The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics