OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean Environmental Data Key Observation Point Information Reasonably Foreseeable Projects Represented

Key Observation Point Information Reasonably Foreseeable Projects Represented in Photosimulation

City, Cape May County, New Jersey
Date Taken: 08/25/2022 County: Cape May Potential Number Theoretical Theoretical
Time: 12:47 PM Town: Ocean City Total Number of
Year of Max Blade Tip of WTGs & OSSs Distance to Distance to
Temperature: 91°F State: New Jersey Project WTGs & OSSs in
Humidity: 29% Location: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier Development Height (feet) Visible from Nearest Visible Furthest Visible
Project
Visibility*: 10+ miles Latitude, Longitude: 39.27506°N, 74.56878°W KOP** WTG (miles) WTG (miles)
Wind Direction: Northwest Direction of View (Center): East (80.3°)

Scenario 2
Scenario 5
Wind Speed: 3 mph Field of View: 124° x 55° Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind
Conditions Observed: Fair South (OCS-A 0499)
2025-2027 1,047 204 205 17.2 33.6

Camera Information Visual Resources

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Character Area: Commercial Beachfront, Seascape
Resolution: 30.4 Megapixels (SCA)
Lens Focal Length: 50 mm User Group: Residents/Tourists, Fishermen Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2023-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3
Camera Height: 5.10 feet AMSL Visually Sensitive Resource: Ocean City Beachfront

Scenario 1
Key Observation Point
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2024-2025 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible

Image 1

Context Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible

Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 32 80 37.6 42.6

US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
0490)

Scenario 3
Atlantic Shores Offshore
2025-2030 1,047 118 164 26.1 43.5
Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

Scenario 4
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 11.0 26.8

Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind

by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
(OCS-A 0544)
10
M
ile
s

Ocean Wind East (OCS-A 0537) by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
20
M
ile
s
30
M
ile
s

Attentive Energy (OCS-A 0538) by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
40
M
ile
s
50
M
ile
s

Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible
0539)
60
M
ile
s
70
M
ile
s

Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind

by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible
Bight (OCS-A 0541)
80
M
ile
s
90
M
ile
s

Invenergy Wind Offshore

by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
(OCS-A 0542)
10
0
M
ile
s

Notes:
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS positions and dimensions
considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
• *Historical meteorological data predicts visibility within a limit of 10 statute miles. However, visibility may extend beyond this distance. The photosimulations assume visibility extends to the limit of physical visibility (including a standard
refraction index).
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate 0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction coefficient may yield more
conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
• **The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, curvature of the earth and
refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in
the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could
account for up to 236 ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number of visible turbines
depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape screening features.

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Photosimulations
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point
5t
h
Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale St
re
et
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.
e
nu
!
ve
Key Observation
A
Point
Ea
e st
ga of Viewnu
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti Av st h
St

st)
n 7t re
so h et

e
p St

nu

thea
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
st et

Av
n n
e ve Ea 8t

ic
Av tA st h

-nor
nt
9t St
n es

la
e h re Pl

At
H av W St et az
re a

orth
et Pl Pl
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City

° (N
th
Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
r y n tra ac
bu Ce
e

18.3
As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
y n
sle

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
ast)
O
ce
an
80.3° (E

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
OC04

10
t
h
!

St
re
et
County, New Jersey

Ea
st
12
th
St
re
et
Existing Conditions (Panorama 1)
lk
rd wa
Boa

14
2.3
°(
So
ut
he
as
t)
0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point
5t Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance h
St
Year of re
et
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest e
Development ve
nu
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
!
Ea
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A e st
ga of Viewnu
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Av st h
St

st)
n 7t re
so h et

e
p
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu

thea
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
st et

Av
n n
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

ic
Av tA st h

-nor
nt
9t St
n es

la
e h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction H av W St
re
et az
a

orth
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City

° (N
th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible r y n tra ac
bu Ce
e

18.3
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, ast)
O
ce
an
80.3° (E
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

10
t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
re
et
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236

st
12
10

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 1: 2023-2025 Project

M
ile
lk
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. wa

s
rd

30
Boa

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with

ile

14
Construction (Ocean Wind, Empire Wind, Empire Wind II)

s
40

2.3
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

M
ile

°(
s
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
50
M

ut
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
60

as
M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

ile

t)
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape

M
ile
°
s
screening features. 80
M
ile
s
90

0 50 100 200
M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10
0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
s

Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point
5t Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance h
St
Year of re
et
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest e
Development ve
nu
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
!
Ea
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A e st
ga of Viewnu
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Av st h
St

st)
n 7t re
so h et

e
p
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu

thea
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
Atlantic Shores Offshore st et

Av
n n
2023-2025 1,047 204 205 17.2 33.6 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

ic
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Av tA st h

-nor
nt
9t St
n es

la
e h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction H av W St
re
et az
a

orth
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3 et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City

° (N
th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible r y n tra ac
bu Ce
e

18.3
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, ast)
O
ce
an
80.3° (E
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

10
t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
re
et
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236

st
12
10

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 2: Atlantic Shores

M
ile
lk
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. wa

s
rd

30
Boa

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with

ile

14
Construction (2025-2027) added to Scenario 1 (Ocean Wind,

s
40

2.3
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

M
ile

°(
s
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
50
Empire Wind, Empire Wind II, Atlantic Shores South)

ut
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
60

as
M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

ile

t)
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape

M
ile
°
s
screening features. 80
M
ile
s
90

0 50 100 200
M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10
0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
s

Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point
5t Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance h
St
Year of re
et
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest e
Development ve
nu
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
!
Ea
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A e st
ga of Viewnu
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Av st h
St

st)
n 7t re
so h et

e
p
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu

thea
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
Atlantic Shores Offshore st et

Av
n n
2023-2025 1,047 204 205 17.2 33.6 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

ic
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Av tA st h

-nor
nt
9t St
n es

la
e h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction H av W St
re
et az
a

orth
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3 et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City

° (N
th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible r y n tra ac
bu Ce
e

18.3
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, ast)
Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible
O
ce
an
80.3° (E
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 32 80 37.6 42.6
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

10
t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

re
et
County, New Jersey
2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random 0490)

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236 Atlantic Shores Offshore

st
2025-2030 1,047 118 164 26.1 43.5

12
10
Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 11.0 26.8
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 3: 2024-2030 Project

M
ile
lk
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. wa

s
rd

30
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind Boa

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

ile

14
construction added after the construction of Atlantic Shores

s
(OCS-A 0544)

40

2.3
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

M
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A

ile

°(
s
by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
50
South (Full Lease Build-out Including Atlantic Shores South)
0537)

ut
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
Attentive Energy (OCS-A

60
by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible

as
M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0538)

ile

t)
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

M
ile
°
by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible

s
screening features. 0539)
80
M
ile
Atlantic Shores Offshore
by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible s
90

0 50 100 200

Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541)

M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10

Invenergy Wind Offshore

0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
(OCS-A 0542)
s

Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point
5t Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance h
St
Year of re
et
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest e
Development ve
nu
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
!
Ea
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A e st
ga of Viewnu
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Av st h
St

st)
n 7t re
so h et

e
p
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu

thea
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
st et

Av
n n
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

ic
Av tA st h

-nor
nt
9t St
n es

la
e h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction H av W St
re
et az
a

orth
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City

° (N
th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible r y n tra ac
bu Ce
e

18.3
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, ast)
Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 32 80 37.6 42.6
O
ce
an
80.3° (E
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

10
0490)

t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
Atlantic Shores Offshore

re
et
County, New Jersey
2025-2030 1,047 118 164 26.1 43.5
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236

st
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 11.0 26.8

12
10

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 4: Full buildout of all

M
(OCS-A 0544)

ile
lk
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. wa

s
rd

30
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A Boa

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible

ile

14
lease areas without Atlantic Shores South

s
0537)

40

2.3
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

M
Attentive Energy (OCS-A

ile

°(
s
by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
50
0538)

ut
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

60
by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible

as
M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0539)

ile

t)
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Atlantic Shores Offshore

M
ile
°
by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible

s
screening features. Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541)
80
M
ile
Invenergy Wind Offshore
by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible s
90

0 50 100 200

(OCS-A 0542)
M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10
0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
s

Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point
5t Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance h
St
Year of re
et
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest e
Development ve
nu
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
!
Ea
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A e st
ga of Viewnu
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Av st h
St

st)
n 7t re
so h et

e
p
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu

thea
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
Atlantic Shores Offshore st et

Av
n n
2023-2025 1,047 204 205 17.2 33.6 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

ic
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Av tA st h

-nor
nt
9t St
n es

la
e h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction H av W St
re
et az
a

orth
et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City

° (N
th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
r y n tra ac
bu Ce
e

18.3
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, ast)
O
ce
an
80.3° (E
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

1 0t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
re
et
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236

st
12
10

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 5: Atlantic Shores

M
ile
lk
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. wa

s
rd

30
Boa

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with

ile

14
South without the construction of other foreseeable planned

s
40

2.3
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

M
ile

°(
s
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
50
activities

ut
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
60

as
M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

ile

t)
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape

M
ile
°
s
screening features. 80
M
ile
s
90

0 50 100 200
M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10
0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
s

Feet
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean Environmental Data Key Observation Point Information Reasonably Foreseeable Projects Represented in Photosimulation
City, Cape May County, New Jersey
Date Taken: 08/25/2022 County: Cape May Potential Number Theoretical Theoretical
Time: 12:47 PM Town: Ocean City Total Number of
Year of Max Blade Tip of WTGs & OSSs Distance to Distance to
Temperature: 91°F State: New Jersey Project WTGs & OSSs in
Humidity: 29% Location: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier Development Height (feet) Visible from Nearest Visible Furthest Visible
Project
Visibility*: 10+ miles Latitude, Longitude: 39.27506°N, 74.56878°W KOP** WTG (miles) WTG (miles)
Wind Direction: Northwest Direction of View (Center): South (179.7°)

Scenario 2
Scenario 5
Wind Speed: 3 mph Field of View: 124° x 55° Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind
Conditions Observed: Fair South (OCS-A 0499)
2025-2027 1,047 204 205 17.2 33.6

Camera Information Visual Resources

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Character Area: Commercial Beachfront, Seascape
Resolution: 30.4 Megapixels (SCA)
Lens Focal Length: 50 mm User Group: Residents/Tourists, Fishermen Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2023-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3
Camera Height: 5.10 feet AMSL Visually Sensitive Resource: Ocean City Beachfront

Scenario 1
Key Observation Point
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2024-2025 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible

Image 1

Context Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible

Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 32 80 37.6 42.6

US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
0490)

Scenario 3
Atlantic Shores Offshore
2025-2030 1,047 118 164 26.1 43.5
Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

Scenario 4
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 11.0 26.8

Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind

by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
(OCS-A 0544)
10
M
ile
s

Ocean Wind East (OCS-A 0537) by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
20
M
ile
s
30
M
ile
s

Attentive Energy (OCS-A 0538) by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
40
M
ile
s
50
M
ile
s

Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible
0539)
60
M
ile
s
70
M
ile
s

Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind

by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible
Bight (OCS-A 0541)
80
M
ile
s
90
M
ile
s

Invenergy Wind Offshore

by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
(OCS-A 0542)
10
0
M
ile
s

Notes:
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS positions and dimensions
considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
• *Historical meteorological data predicts visibility within a limit of 10 statute miles. However, visibility may extend beyond this distance. The photosimulations assume visibility extends to the limit of physical visibility (including a standard
refraction index).
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate 0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction coefficient may yield more
conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
• **The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, curvature of the earth and
refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in
the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could
account for up to 236 ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number of visible turbines
depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape screening features.

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Photosimulations
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #1

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location

e
nu
Ea

e
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale

Av
Br st
4t

n
ig

ia
ht h
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.

th
ue on St

rin
n re
ve Pl et

Co
Key Observation Point
!
A Ea ac
g a of Viewnue st e
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti Av st h
St
o n 7t re
ps h et

e
St

nu
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
st et 5t

Av
n n h
e ve Ea 8t St

ic
Av tA st h

nt
9t St re
en es et

la
h re Pl

At
v W et az
Ha St
re a
et Pl Pl
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City th
Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
r y ntra ac
bu Ce nu M e
As

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
y n
sle

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
an
ce
O

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
OC04

10
t
h
!

St
re
et
County, New Jersey

Ea
st
12
th
St
re
et
Existing Conditions (Panorama 2)
) 117
ard
walk
w est .7°
(Ea
uth
Bo
st-
-so

179.7° (South)
sou
West the
.7 °( ast
)
241

0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #1

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location

e
nu
Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance Ea

e
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale

Av
st
Year of
Br
4t

n
ig
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest

ia
ht h
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.

th
ue on St
Development

rin
n re
ve Pl et
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG

Co
Key Observation Point
!
Ea ac
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A
g a of Viewnue st e
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) o n
Av st
7t
h
St
re
ps h et

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
st et 5t

Av
n n h
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate St

ic
Av tA st h

nt
9t St re
en es et

la
h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction
v W et az
Ha St
re a
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible r y ntra ac
bu Ce
e
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, O
ce
an

curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

10
t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
re
et
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236

st
12
10

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 1: 2023-2025 Project
117

M
)

ile
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. alk
est .7°

s
w
ard w (Ea

30
uth
Bo
st-

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with -so

ile

179.7° (South)
sou
Construction (Ocean Wind, Empire Wind, Empire Wind II)

s
est the

40
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant °( W

M
ast

ile
.7 )

s
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations. 41

50
2

M
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

s
60
M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

ile
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape

M
ile
°
s
screening features. 80
M
ile
s
90

0 50 100 200
M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10
0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
s

Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #1

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location

e
nu
Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance Ea

e
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale

Av
st
Year of
Br
4t

n
ig
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest

ia
ht h
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.

th
ue on St
Development

rin
n re
ve Pl et
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG

Co
Key Observation Point
!
Ea ac
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A
g a of Viewnue st e
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) o n
Av st
7t
h
St
re
ps h et

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
Atlantic Shores Offshore st et 5t

Av
n n h
2023-2025 1,047 204 205 17.2 33.6 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate St

ic
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Av tA st h

nt
9t St re
en es et

la
h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction
v W et az
Ha St
re a
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3 et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible r y ntra ac
bu Ce
e
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, O
ce
an

curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

10
t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
re
et
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236

st
12
10

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 2: Atlantic Shores
117

M
)

ile
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. alk
est .7°

s
w
ard w (Ea

30
uth
Bo
st-

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with -so

ile

179.7° (South)
sou
Construction (2025-2027) added to Scenario 1 (Ocean Wind,

s
est the

40
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant °( W

M
ast

ile
.7 )

s
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations. 41

50
2
Empire Wind, Empire Wind II, Atlantic Shores South)

M
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

s
60
M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

ile
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape

M
ile
°
s
screening features. 80
M
ile
s
90

0 50 100 200
M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10
0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
s

Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #1

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location

e
nu
Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance Ea

e
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale

Av
st
Year of
Br
4t

n
ig
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest

ia
ht h
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.

th
ue on St
Development

rin
n re
ve Pl et
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG

Co
Key Observation Point
!
Ea ac
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A
g a of Viewnue st e
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) o n
Av st
7t
h
St
re
ps h et

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
Atlantic Shores Offshore st et 5t

Av
n n h
2023-2025 1,047 204 205 17.2 33.6 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate St

ic
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Av tA st h

nt
9t St re
en es et

la
h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction
v W et az
Ha St
re a
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3 et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible r y ntra ac
bu Ce
e
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible
O
ce
an

curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 32 80 37.6 42.6
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

10
t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

re
et
County, New Jersey
2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random 0490)

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236 Atlantic Shores Offshore

st
2025-2030 1,047 118 164 26.1 43.5

12
10
Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 11.0 26.8
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 3: 2024-2030 Project
117

M
)

ile
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. alk
est .7°

s
w
ard w (Ea

30
uth
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind Bo
st-

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible -so

ile

179.7° (South)
sou
construction added after the construction of Atlantic Shores

s
(OCS-A 0544) est the

40
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant °( W

M
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A ast

ile
.7 )

s
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations. by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible 41

50
2
South (Full Lease Build-out Including Atlantic Shores South)
0537)

M
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

s
Attentive Energy (OCS-A

60
by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible

M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0538)

ile
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

M
ile
°
by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible

s
screening features. 0539)
80
M
ile
Atlantic Shores Offshore
by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible s
90

0 50 100 200

Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541)

M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10

Invenergy Wind Offshore

0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
(OCS-A 0542)
s

Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #1

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location

e
nu
Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance Ea

e
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale

Av
st
Year of
Br
4t

n
ig
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest

ia
ht h
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.

th
ue on St
Development

rin
n re
ve Pl et
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG

Co
Key Observation Point
!
Ea ac
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A
g a of Viewnue st e
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) o n
Av st
7t
h
St
re
ps h et

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
st et 5t

Av
n n h
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 15.6 26.3 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate St

ic
Av tA st h

nt
9t St re
en es et

la
h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction
v W et az
Ha St
re a
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible r y ntra ac
bu Ce
e
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 32 80 37.6 42.6
O
ce
an

curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

10
0490)

t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
Atlantic Shores Offshore

re
et
County, New Jersey
2025-2030 1,047 118 164 26.1 43.5
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236

st
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 11.0 26.8

12
10

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 4: Full buildout of all
117

M
(OCS-A 0544) )

ile
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. alk
est .7°

s
w
ard w (Ea

30
uth
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A Bo
st-

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible -so

ile

179.7° (South)
sou
lease areas without Atlantic Shores South

s
0537) est the

40
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant °( W

M
Attentive Energy (OCS-A ast

ile
.7 )

s
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations. by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible 41

50
0538) 2

M
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

s
Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

60
by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible

M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0539)

ile
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Atlantic Shores Offshore

M
ile
°
by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible

s
screening features. Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541)
80
M
ile
Invenergy Wind Offshore
by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible s
90

0 50 100 200

(OCS-A 0542)
M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10
0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
s

Feet
 MATCH LINE OC04 PANO #1

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location

e
nu
Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance Ea

e
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale

Av
st
Year of
Br
4t

n
ig
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest

ia
ht h
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.

th
ue on St
Development

rin
n re
ve Pl et
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG

Co
Key Observation Point
!
Ea ac
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
A
g a of Viewnue st e
Cone
o e Ea 6t
Ti
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) o n
Av st
7t
h
St
re
ps h et

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
St

nu
m Ea
Si ue ue re

e
Atlantic Shores Offshore st et 5t

Av
n n h
2023-2025 1,047 204 205 17.2 33.6 e ve Ea 8t
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate St

ic
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Av tA st h

nt
9t St re
en es et

la
h re Pl

At
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction
v W et az
Ha St
re a
et Pl Pl
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed
e ym ac
ue nu ou e
en ve Ocean City th
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. Av lA

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Pl
r y ntra ac
bu Ce
e
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform As nu M

e
e oo
Av

Ea
rly

Photosimulations

st
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. sle
y n

1
Te

1t
e e r

h
W ra
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated nu

St
e ce

re
Av

et
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, O
ce
an

curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in

Ea
OC04: Gillian’s Wonderland Pier, Ocean City, Cape May

st
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, OC04

1 0t
h
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts

St
re
et
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random

Ea
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236

st
12
10

th
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

St
ile

re
s
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of

et
20
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 5: Atlantic Shores
117

M
)

ile
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. alk
est .7°

s
w
ard w (Ea

30
uth
Bo
st-

M
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with -so

ile

179.7° (South)
sou
South without the construction of other foreseeable planned

s
est the

40
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant °( W

M
ast

ile
.7 )

s
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations. 41

50
2
activities

M
ile
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

s
60
M
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

ile
s
70
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape

M
ile
°
s
screening features. 80
M
ile
s
90

0 50 100 200
M

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
ile
s

Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
10
0

0 250 500 1,000

on the printed
M

in order to obtain the proper perspective.

ile

panorama
s

Feet
SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle Environmental Data Key Observation Point Information Reasonably Foreseeable Projects Represented in Photosimulation
City, Cape May County, New Jersey
Date Taken: 08/25/2022 County: Cape May Potential Number Theoretical Theoretical
Time: 4:58 PM Town: Ocean City Total Number of
Year of Max Blade Tip of WTGs & OSSs Distance to Distance to
Temperature: 84°F State: New Jersey Project WTGs & OSSs in
Humidity: 53% Location: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge Development Height (feet) Visible from Nearest Visible Furthest Visible
Project
Visibility*: 10+ miles Latitude, Longitude: 39.11919°N, 74.71576°W KOP** WTG (miles) WTG (miles)
Wind Direction: South-southeast Direction of View (Center): East-northeast (73.4°)

Scenario 2
Scenario 5
Wind Speed: 10 mph Field of View: 124° x 55° Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind
Conditions Observed: Fair South (OCS-A 0499)
2025-2027 1,047 200 205 27.4 43.6

Camera Information Visual Resources

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Character Area: Open Water/Ocean, Undeveloped Bay,
Resolution: 30.4 Megapixels Seascape (SCA)
Lens Focal Length: 50 mm User Group: Residents/Tourists Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2023-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6
Camera Height: 40.18 feet AMSL Visually Sensitive Resource: Sea Isle City Beach Dune
Upland, Townsend
Inlet Bridge (SI&A #3100003)

Scenario 1
Key Observation Point
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2024-2025 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible

Image 1

Context Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 1 33 35.3 42.2

Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 62 80 26.6 35.7

US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
0490)

Scenario 3
Atlantic Shores Offshore
2025-2030 1,047 134 164 37.6 51.1
Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

Scenario 4
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 12.1 26.0

Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind

by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
(OCS-A 0544)

Ocean Wind East (OCS-A 0537) by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
10
M
ile
s
20
Mi
sle

Attentive Energy (OCS-A 0538) by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
30
Mi
les
40
Mi
les

Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible
50

0539)
Mi
les
60
Mi
sle

Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind

70
Mi

by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible

sle

Bight (OCS-A 0541)

80
Mi
les
90
Mi

Invenergy Wind Offshore

sle

by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible

(OCS-A 0542)
10
0M
ile
s

Notes:
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS positions and dimensions
considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
• *Historical meteorological data predicts visibility within a limit of 10 statute miles. However, visibility may extend beyond this distance. The photosimulations assume visibility extends to the limit of physical visibility (including a standard
refraction index).
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate 0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction coefficient may yield more
conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
• **The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, curvature of the earth and
refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in
the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could
account for up to 236 ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number of visible turbines
depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape screening features.

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Photosimulations
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. ! Key Observation Point

Cone of View

east)
-north
North
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

11.4° (
theast)
Photosimulations 73.4
° (East-nor

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May

SIC02
!

County, New Jersey

Existing Conditions (Panorama 1)

Oce

13
5.
an D

°(4
So
rive

ut
he
as
t)
7th
Str
eet 0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100

Development
Mi
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. 90 Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi

east)
les

positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. 80

-north
Mi
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les

0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction 70
Mi

North
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi

11.4° (
les
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50
the
Photosimulations
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les

° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.4
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30
Mi
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, SIC02
!
20
waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
Mi
les

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
10
Mi
les

ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 1: 2023-2025 Project view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
Construction (Ocean Wind, Empire Wind, Empire Wind II)

Oce

13
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
an D

°(4
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
rive

ut
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
as
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

t)
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
screening features. 7th
Str
eet 0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100

Development
Mi
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. 90 Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi

east)
les

positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore
80

-north
Mi
2023-2025 1,047 200 205 27.4 43.6
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les
Wind South (OCS-A 0499)
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction 70
Mi

North
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi

11.4° (
les
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50
the
Photosimulations
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.4
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30
Mi
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, SIC02
!
20
waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
Mi
les

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
10
Mi
les

ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 2: Atlantic Shores view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
Construction (2025-2027) added to Scenario 1 (Ocean Wind,

Oce

13
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
an D

°(4
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
rive
Empire Wind, Empire Wind II, Atlantic Shores South)

ut
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
as
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

t)
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
screening features. 7th
Str
eet 0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100

Development
Mi
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. 90 Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi

east)
les

positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore
80

-north
Mi
2023-2025 1,047 200 205 27.4 43.6
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les
Wind South (OCS-A 0499)
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction 70
Mi

North
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi

11.4° (
les
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50
the
Photosimulations
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.4
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 1 33 35.3 42.2
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30
Mi
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May

Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 62 80 26.6 35.7
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 20
SIC02
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
Mi
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and les

County, New Jersey

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random 0490) 10
Mi

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
les
Atlantic Shores Offshore
2025-2030 1,047 134 164 37.6 51.1
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position. Wind North (OCS-A 0549)
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 12.1 26.0
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 3: 2024-2030 Project view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

construction added after the construction of Atlantic Shores

Oce

13
(OCS-A 0544)
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
an D

4
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A

°(
by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
rive
South (Full Lease Build-out Including Atlantic Shores South)
0537)

ut
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
Attentive Energy (OCS-A
by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible

as
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0538)

t)
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

°
by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible
screening features. 0539) 7th
Str
Atlantic Shores Offshore eet
by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible 0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541) Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed Invenergy Wind Offshore 0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
panorama
(OCS-A 0542) Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100

Development
Mi
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. 90 Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi

east)
les

positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. 80

-north
Mi
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les

0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction 70
Mi

North
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi

11.4° (
les
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50
the
Photosimulations
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les
Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 1 33 35.3 42.2
° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.4
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 62 80 26.6 35.7
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30
Mi
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 0490) 20
SIC02
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
Mi
Atlantic Shores Offshore les

County, New Jersey

2025-2030 1,047 134 164 37.6 51.1
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random Wind North (OCS-A 0549) 10
Mi

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
les

Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 12.1 26.0
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 4: Full buildout of all
(OCS-A 0544)
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. Ocean Wind East (OCS-A
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible

lease areas without Atlantic Shores South

Oce

13
0537)
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
an D

4
Attentive Energy (OCS-A

°(
by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

So
rive
0538)

ut
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A
by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible

as
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0539)

t)
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Atlantic Shores Offshore

°
by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible
screening features. Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541) 7th
Str
Invenergy Wind Offshore eet
by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible 0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should (OCS-A 0542) Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #2

Notes:
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100

Development
Mi
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. 90 Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi

east)
les

positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore
80

-north
Mi
2023-2025 1,047 200 205 27.4 43.6
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les
Wind South (OCS-A 0499)
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction 70
Mi

North
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi

11.4° (
les

• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50
the
Photosimulations
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les

° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.4
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30
Mi
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, SIC02
!
20
waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
Mi
les

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
10
Mi
les

ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 5: Atlantic Shores view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
South without the construction of other foreseeable planned

Oce

13
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
an D

4°
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

(S
rive
activities

ou
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

th
ea
st
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

)
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
screening features. 7th
Str
eet 0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle Environmental Data Key Observation Point Information Reasonably Foreseeable Projects Represented in Photosimulation
City, Cape May County, New Jersey
Date Taken: 08/25/2022 County: Cape May Potential Number Theoretical Theoretical
Time: 4:58 PM Town: Ocean City Total Number of
Year of Max Blade Tip of WTGs & OSSs Distance to Distance to
Temperature: 84°F State: New Jersey Project WTGs & OSSs in
Humidity: 53% Location: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge Development Height (feet) Visible from Nearest Visible Furthest Visible
Project
Visibility*: 10+ miles Latitude, Longitude: 39.11919°N, 74.71576°W KOP** WTG (miles) WTG (miles)
Wind Direction: South-southeast Direction of View (Center): Southeast (135.6°)

Scenario 2
Scenario 5
Wind Speed: 10 mph Field of View: 124° x 55° Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind
Conditions Observed: Fair South (OCS-A 0499)
2025-2027 1,047 200 205 27.4 43.6

Camera Information Visual Resources

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Character Area: Open Water/Ocean, Undeveloped Bay,
Resolution: 30.4 Megapixels Seascape (SCA)
Lens Focal Length: 50 mm User Group: Residents/Tourists Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2023-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6
Camera Height: 40.18 feet AMSL Visually Sensitive Resource: Sea Isle City Beach Dune
Upland, Townsend
Inlet Bridge (SI&A #3100003)

Scenario 1
Key Observation Point
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2024-2025 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible

Image 1

Context Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 1 33 35.3 42.2

Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 62 80 26.6 35.7

US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
0490)

Scenario 3
Atlantic Shores Offshore
2025-2030 1,047 134 164 37.6 51.1
Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

Scenario 4
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 12.1 26.0

Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind

by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
(OCS-A 0544)

Ocean Wind East (OCS-A 0537) by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
10
M
ile
s
20
Mi
sle

Attentive Energy (OCS-A 0538) by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
30
Mi
les
40
Mi
les

Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible
50

0539)
Mi
les
60
Mi
sle

Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind

70
Mi

by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible

sle

Bight (OCS-A 0541)

80
Mi
les
90
Mi

Invenergy Wind Offshore

sle

by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible

(OCS-A 0542)
10
0M
ile
s

Notes:
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS positions and dimensions
considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
• *Historical meteorological data predicts visibility within a limit of 10 statute miles. However, visibility may extend beyond this distance. The photosimulations assume visibility extends to the limit of physical visibility (including a standard
refraction index).
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate 0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction coefficient may yield more
conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
• **The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, curvature of the earth and
refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in
the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could
account for up to 236 ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number of visible turbines
depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape screening features.

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Photosimulations
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #1

Notes: Ann
Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point LocationPhillips Aven
a
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale 88t
hS
ue

equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.

tree
! Key Observation Point
t
89t
hS
Cone of View tree
t

e
nu
90t
hS

e
tree

ue

Av
t

en

e
ur
Av

as
is

Ple
nd
La
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative ast)
Photosimulations
the
ast-nor
° (E
73.6

n
Drive
Ocea
SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May SIC02 !

County, New Jersey

Existing Conditions (Panorama 2)

st)
thwe

13
-sou

5.
6°
(S
outh

ou
th
ea
6° (S

s
t)
7th

197.
Str

°
eet

0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #1

Notes: Ann
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point LocationPhillips Aven
a
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance ue
Year of 88t
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100 hS
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.
tree
Development
Mi t
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
89t
hS
90 Cone of View tree
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi t

e
les

nu
90t
hS

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
tree

ue

Av
t

en
80

e
Mi

ur
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6

Av
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les

as
is

Ple
nd
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction

La
70
Mi
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi
les
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50

Photosimulations
the
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les

° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.6
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30

n
Mi

Drive
Ocea
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people,
waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
20
Mi
les
SIC02 !

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
10
Mi
les

ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 1: 2023-2025 Project

st)
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

thwe
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
Construction (Ocean Wind, Empire Wind, Empire Wind II)

13
-sou
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
6°
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

(S
outh

ou
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

th
ea
6° (S

s
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

t)
7th

197.
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Str

°
eet
screening features.
0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #1

Notes: Ann
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point LocationPhillips Aven
a
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance ue
Year of 88t
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100 hS
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.
tree
Development
Mi t
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
89t
hS
90 Cone of View tree
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi t

e
les

nu
90t
hS

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
tree

ue

Av
t

en
Atlantic Shores Offshore
80

e
Mi

ur
2023-2025 1,047 200 205 27.4 43.6

Av
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les

as
Wind South (OCS-A 0499)

is

Ple
nd
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction

La
70
Mi
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi
les
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50

Photosimulations
the
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.6
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30

n
Mi

Drive
Ocea
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people,
waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
20
Mi
les
SIC02 !

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
10
Mi
les

ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 2: Atlantic Shores

st)
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

thwe
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
Construction (2025-2027) added to Scenario 1 (Ocean Wind,

13
-sou
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
6°
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

(S
outh
Empire Wind, Empire Wind II, Atlantic Shores South)

ou
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

th
ea
6° (S

s
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

t)
7th

197.
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Str

°
eet
screening features.
0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #1

Notes: Ann
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point LocationPhillips Aven
a
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance ue
Year of 88t
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100 hS
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.
tree
Development
Mi t
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
89t
hS
90 Cone of View tree
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi t

e
les

nu
90t
hS

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
tree

ue

Av
t

en
Atlantic Shores Offshore
80

e
Mi

ur
2023-2025 1,047 200 205 27.4 43.6

Av
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les

as
Wind South (OCS-A 0499)

is

Ple
nd
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction

La
70
Mi
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi
les
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50

Photosimulations
the
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.6
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 1 33 35.3 42.2
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30

n
Mi

Drive
Ocea
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May

Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 62 80 26.6 35.7
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 20 SIC02 !
waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
Mi
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and les

County, New Jersey

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random 0490) 10
Mi

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
les
Atlantic Shores Offshore
2025-2030 1,047 134 164 37.6 51.1
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position. Wind North (OCS-A 0549)
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 12.1 26.0
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 3: 2024-2030 Project

st)
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

thwe
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

construction added after the construction of Atlantic Shores

13
(OCS-A 0544)

-sou
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
6°
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A
by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

(S
outh
South (Full Lease Build-out Including Atlantic Shores South)
0537)

ou
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

th
Attentive Energy (OCS-A

ea
6° (S
by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible

s
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0538)

t)
7th

197.
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A Str

°
by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible eet
screening features. 0539)
Atlantic Shores Offshore
by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible 0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541) Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed Invenergy Wind Offshore 0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
panorama
(OCS-A 0542) Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #1

Notes: Ann
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point LocationPhillips Aven
a
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance ue
Year of 88t
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100 hS
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.
tree
Development
Mi t
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
89t
hS
90 Cone of View tree
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi t

e
les

nu
90t
hS

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
tree

ue

Av
t

en
80

e
Mi

ur
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 111 111 18.5 32.6

Av
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les

as
is

Ple
nd
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction

La
70
Mi
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 0 72 Not Visible Not Visible
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi
les
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50

Photosimulations
the
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les
Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 1 33 35.3 42.2
° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.6
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 62 80 26.6 35.7
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30

n
Mi

Drive
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

Ocea
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 0490) 20 SIC02 !
waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
Mi
Atlantic Shores Offshore les

County, New Jersey

2025-2030 1,047 134 164 37.6 51.1
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random Wind North (OCS-A 0549) 10
Mi

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
les

Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 111 111 12.1 26.0
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 4: Full buildout of all

st)
(OCS-A 0544)
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

thwe
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible

lease areas without Atlantic Shores South

13
0537)

-sou
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
6°
Attentive Energy (OCS-A
by 2030 853 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

(S
outh
0538)

ou
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

th
Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

ea
6° (S
by 2030 853 0 148 Not Visible Not Visible

s
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0539)

t)
7th

197.
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Atlantic Shores Offshore Str

°
by 2030 853 0 95 Not Visible Not Visible eet
screening features. Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541)
Invenergy Wind Offshore
by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible 0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should (OCS-A 0542) Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SIC02 PANO #1

Notes: Ann
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point LocationPhillips Aven
a
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance ue
Year of 88t
Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest 100 hS
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen.
tree
Development
Mi t
les
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
! Key Observation Point

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.
89t
hS
90 Cone of View tree
Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles) Mi t

e
les

nu
90t
hS

e
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
tree

ue

Av
t

en
Atlantic Shores Offshore
80

e
Mi

ur
2023-2025 1,047 200 205 27.4 43.6

Av
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate
les

as
Wind South (OCS-A 0499)

is

Ple
nd
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction

La
70
Mi
les

coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed 60
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
Mi
les

• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform
ast)
50

Photosimulations
the
Mi
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations. -nor
les

° (East
• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 40
Mi
les 73.6
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in
30

n
Mi

Drive
Ocea
les

SIC02: Townsend’s Inlet Bridge, Sea Isle City, Cape May the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people,
waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
20
Mi
les
SIC02 !

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
10
Mi
les

ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.

• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 5: Atlantic Shores

st)
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

thwe
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
South without the construction of other foreseeable planned

13
-sou
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant

5.
6°
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

(S
outh
activities

o ut
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

he
6° (S

as
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

t)
7th

197.
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Str

°
eet
screening features.
0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Environmental Data Key Observation Point Information Reasonably Foreseeable Projects Represented in Photosimulation
Borough, Ocean County, New Jersey
Date Taken: 08/25/2022 County: Ocean Potential Number Theoretical Theoretical
Time: 7:05 AM Town: Seaside Park Borough Total Number of
Year of Max Blade Tip of WTGs & OSSs Distance to Distance to
Temperature: 67°F State: New Jersey Project WTGs & OSSs in
Humidity: 84% Location: Seaside Park Beach Development Height (feet) Visible from Nearest Visible Furthest Visible
Project
Visibility*: 10+ miles Latitude, Longitude: 39.93530°N, 74.07163°W KOP** WTG (miles) WTG (miles)
Wind Direction: West-northwest Direction of View (Center): East-northeast (58.6°)

Scenario 2
Scenario 5
Wind Speed: 3 mph Field of View: 124° x 55° Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind
Conditions Observed: Fair South (OCS-A 0499)
2025-2027 1,047 118 205 39.0 48.0

Camera Information Visual Resources

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Resolution: 30.4 Megapixels
Lens Focal Length: 50 mm
Camera Height: 16.23 feet AMSL
Character Area: Commercial Beachfront, Seascape
(SCA)
User Group: Residents/Tourists, Fishermen Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2023-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible
Visually Sensitive Resource: Seaside Park Beach and
Boardwalk, U.S.
Life Saving Station No. 13

Scenario 1
Key Observation Point
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2024-2025 951 52 72 39.8 46.1

Image 1

Context Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0

Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible

Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 0 80 Not Visible Not Visible

US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
0490)
10
M
ile
s

20

Scenario 3
M
ile
s

Atlantic Shores Offshore

2025-2030 1,047 157 164 19.3 42.2
Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

Scenario 4
30
M
ile
s

40
M
ile
s

Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible
50
M
ile
s

Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind

60
M
ile

by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

s

(OCS-A 0544)
70
M
ile
s

Ocean Wind East (OCS-A 0537) by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
80
M
ile
s

90
M
ile
s

10
0
M
Attentive Energy (OCS-A 0538) by 2030 853 7 101 42.4 43.9
ile
s

Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

by 2030 853 13 148 41.8 43.8
0539)

Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind

by 2030 853 17 95 39.5 43.9
Bight (OCS-A 0541)

Invenergy Wind Offshore

by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
(OCS-A 0542)

Notes:
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS positions and dimensions
considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
• *Historical meteorological data predicts visibility within a limit of 10 statute miles. However, visibility may extend beyond this distance. The photosimulations assume visibility extends to the limit of physical visibility (including a standard
refraction index).
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate 0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction coefficient may yield more
conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
• **The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, curvature of the earth and
refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in
the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could
account for up to 236 ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number of visible turbines
depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape screening features.

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Photosimulations
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #2

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. ! Key Observation Point
Hamilton

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Bay Boule

Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
)

356.6° (North)
st
ea
rth
Lincoln Av
enue
o
s t-n
Ea
Dupont Av
enue
.6 °(
58
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n ue

levard
Farragut A
v enue

Ocean Bou
Stockton

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

Avenue
SPB01
!
Decatur Av

nu e
enue

County, New Jersey

yview Ave
Lafayette A

nue
venue

Central Ave
Ba
Lake A v e
O Street

Existing Conditions (Panorama 1)

n N Street
12

enue
Northeast
ue
0.6
° (E

enue
Central Av
ast
M Street -so

cean Av
uth
ea
st)

Northwest

North O
L Street

K Street

J Street
0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed I Street
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #2

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. )

356.6° (North)
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible st
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate Lincoln Av
enue rth
ea
o
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 52 72 39.8 46.1 s t-n
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Ea
Dupont Av
enue
.6 °(
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. 58
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M
ile ue
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in M
ile
s
Stockton

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

Avenue
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 50
M
SPB01
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av

nu e
s enue

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
M
ile
Lafayette A

nue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue
70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
M

Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 1: 2023-2025 Project

ile n
s N Street
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. 12

enue
Northeast
ue
90
0.6
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M
° (E

enue
ile

Central Av
Construction (Ocean Wind, Empire Wind, Empire Wind II)
ast
s

the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant
10 M Street -so

cean Av
0
M
ile uth
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s
ea
st)

Northwest

North O
L Street
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number K Street

of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
screening features. J Street
0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed I Street
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #2

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore )

356.6° (North)
2023-2025 1,047 118 205 39.0 48.0 st
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Lincoln Av
enue rth
ea
o
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible s t-n
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Ea
Dupont Av
enue
.6 °(
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. 58
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 52 72 39.8 46.1
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M ue
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0
ile
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in M
ile
s
Stockton

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

Avenue
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 50
M
SPB01
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av

nu e
s enue

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
M
ile
Lafayette A

nue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue
70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
M

Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 2: Atlantic Shores

ile n
s N Street
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. 12

enue
Northeast
ue
90
0.6
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M
° (E

enue
ile

Central Av
Construction (2025-2027) added to Scenario 1 (Ocean Wind,
ast
s

the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant
10 M Street -so

cean Av
0
M
ile uth
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s
ea
st)
Empire Wind, Empire Wind II, Atlantic Shores South)

Northwest

North O
L Street
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number K Street

of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
screening features. J Street
0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed I Street
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #2

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore )

356.6° (North)
2023-2025 1,047 118 205 39.0 48.0 st
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Lincoln Av
enue rth
ea
o
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible s t-n
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Ea
Dupont Av
enue
.6 °(
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. 58
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 52 72 39.8 46.1
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M ue
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0
ile
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in M
ile
s
Stockton

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

Avenue
Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 0 80 Not Visible Not Visible
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 50
M
SPB01
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av

nu e
s
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and enue

County, New Jersey

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
0490) M
ile
Lafayette A

nue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue
Atlantic Shores Offshore
2025-2030 1,047 157 164 19.3 42.2 70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position. Wind North (OCS-A 0549) ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible M

Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 3: 2024-2030 Project

ile n
s N Street
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. 12

enue
Northeast
ue
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
90
0.6
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M
° (E

enue
by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible ile

Central Av
construction added after the construction of Atlantic Shores
ast
s
(OCS-A 0544)
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant
10 M Street -so

cean Av
0
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A M
ile uth
by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible ea
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s
st)
South (Full Lease Build-out Including Atlantic Shores South)
0537)

Northwest

North O
L Street
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, Attentive Energy (OCS-A
by 2030 853 7 101 42.4 43.9
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0538) K Street

of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

°
by 2030 853 13 148 41.8 43.8
screening features. 0539)
J Street
Atlantic Shores Offshore
by 2030 853 17 95 39.5 43.9 0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541) Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed Invenergy Wind Offshore I Street
0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
panorama
(OCS-A 0542) Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #2

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. )

356.6° (North)
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible st
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate Lincoln Av
enue rth
ea
o
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 52 72 39.8 46.1 s t-n
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Ea
Dupont Av
enue
.6 °(
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. 58
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M ue
Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible
ile
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 0 80 Not Visible Not Visible
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and
M
ile
s
Stockton

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

Avenue
2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 0490) 50
M
SPB01
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av

nu e
s
Atlantic Shores Offshore enue

County, New Jersey

2025-2030 1,047 157 164 19.3 42.2
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
Wind North (OCS-A 0549) M
ile
Lafayette A

nue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible 70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible M

Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 4: Full buildout of all

ile n
(OCS-A 0544) s N Street
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. 12

enue
Northeast
ue
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A
90
0.6
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M
° (E

enue
by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible ile

Central Av
lease areas without Atlantic Shores South
ast
s
0537)
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant
10 M Street -so

cean Av
0
Attentive Energy (OCS-A M
ile uth
by 2030 853 7 101 42.4 43.9 ea
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s
0538) st)

Northwest

North O
L Street
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A
by 2030 853 13 148 41.8 43.8
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0539) K Street

of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Atlantic Shores Offshore

°
by 2030 853 17 95 39.5 43.9
screening features. Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541)
J Street
Invenergy Wind Offshore
by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible 0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should (OCS-A 0542) Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed I Street
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #2

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore )

356.6° (North)
2023-2025 1,047 118 205 39.0 48.0 st
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Lincoln Av
enue rth
ea
o
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction s t-n
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Ea
Dupont Av
enue
.6 °(
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13. 58
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M
ile ue
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in M
ile
s
Stockton

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

Avenue
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 50
M
SPB01
!

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av

nu e
s enue

County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
M
ile
Lafayette A

ue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue

n
70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
M

Photosimulation (Panorama 1): Scenario 5: Atlantic Shores

ile n
s N Street
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility. 12

enue
Northeast
ue
90
0.6
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M
° (E

enue
ile

Central Av
South without the construction of other foreseeable planned
ast
s

the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant
10 M Street -so

cean Av
0
M
ile uth
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s
ea
st)
activities

Northwest

North O
L Street
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number K Street

of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
screening features. J Street
0 50 100
°200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
0 250 500 1,000
on the printed I Street
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Environmental Data Key Observation Point Information Reasonably Foreseeable Projects Represented in Photosimulation
Borough, Ocean County, New Jersey
Date Taken: 08/25/2022 County: Ocean Potential Number Theoretical Theoretical
Time: 7:05 AM Town: Seaside Park Borough Total Number of
Year of Max Blade Tip of WTGs & OSSs Distance to Distance to
Temperature: 67°F State: New Jersey Project WTGs & OSSs in
Humidity: 84% Location: Seaside Park Beach Development Height (feet) Visible from Nearest Visible Furthest Visible
Project
Visibility*: 10+ miles Latitude, Longitude: 39.93530°N, 74.07163°W KOP** WTG (miles) WTG (miles)
Wind Direction: West-northwest Direction of View (Center): East-northeast (58.6°)

Scenario 2
Scenario 5
Wind Speed: 3 mph Field of View: 124° x 55° Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind
Conditions Observed: Fair South (OCS-A 0499)
2025-2027 1,047 118 205 39.0 48.0

Camera Information Visual Resources

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Resolution: 30.4 Megapixels
Lens Focal Length: 50 mm
Camera Height: 16.23 feet AMSL
Character Area: Commercial Beachfront, Seascape
(SCA)
User Group: Residents/Tourists, Fishermen Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2023-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible
Visually Sensitive Resource: Seaside Park Beach and
Boardwalk, U.S.
Life Saving Station No. 13

Scenario 1
Key Observation Point
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2024-2025 951 52 72 39.8 46.1

Image 1

Context Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0

Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible

Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 0 80 Not Visible Not Visible

US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and

2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
0490)
10
M
ile
s

20

Scenario 3
M
ile
s

Atlantic Shores Offshore

2025-2030 1,047 157 164 19.3 42.2
Wind North (OCS-A 0549)

Scenario 4
30
M
ile
s

40
M
ile
s

Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible
50
M
ile
s

Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind

60
M
ile

by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

s

(OCS-A 0544)
70
M
ile
s

Ocean Wind East (OCS-A 0537) by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
80
M
ile
s

90
M
ile
s

10
0
M
Attentive Energy (OCS-A 0538) by 2030 853 7 101 42.4 43.9
ile
s

Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

by 2030 853 13 148 41.8 43.8
0539)

Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind

by 2030 853 17 95 39.5 43.9
Bight (OCS-A 0541)

Invenergy Wind Offshore

by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
(OCS-A 0542)

Notes:
• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data. Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS positions and dimensions
considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
• *Historical meteorological data predicts visibility within a limit of 10 statute miles. However, visibility may extend beyond this distance. The photosimulations assume visibility extends to the limit of physical visibility (including a standard
refraction index).
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate 0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction coefficient may yield more
conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
• **The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, curvature of the earth and
refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in
the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could
account for up to 236 ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number of visible turbines
depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape screening features.

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative

Photosimulations
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #1

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. ! Key Observation Point
Hamilton

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Bay Boule

e
n Terrac
Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue

Ocea
Lincoln Av
enue

Dupont Av
enue

Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative Central Avenue

Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n ue

levard
Farragut A
v enue

Ocean Bou
Stockton A

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

v enue
SPB01
!
Decatur Av
94.3° (East)

nu e

n
enue

Avenue
North Ocea
County, New Jersey

yview Ave
Lafayette A

nue
venue

Central Ave
Ba
Lake A v e
O Street

Existing Conditions (Panorama 2)

n N Street

156
enue
Northeast
ue

.3°
st)
Central Av

we

(So
M Street

uth
ut
So
Northwest

-so
L Street

°(
8.3

uth
21
K Street

eas
°

) t
J Street
0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed
I Street 0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #1

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

e
n Terrac
Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

Ocea
Lincoln Av
enue
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 52 72 39.8 46.1
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Dupont Av
enue
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M
ile ue
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in M
ile
s Stockton A

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

v enue
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 50
M !
SPB01

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av
94.3° (East)

nu e

n
s enue

Avenue
North Ocea
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
M
ile
Lafayette A

nue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue
70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
M

Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 1: 2023-2025 Project

ile n
s N Street

156
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

enue
Northeast
ue
90

• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M

.3°
st)
ile

Central Av
Construction (Ocean Wind, Empire Wind, Empire Wind II)
s

we

(So
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant M Street
10
0

h
M
ile

uth
ut
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s

So
Northwest

-so
L Street

°(
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

8.3

uth
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

21
K Street

eas
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
°

) t
screening features. J Street
0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed
I Street 0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #1

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

e
n Terrac
Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore
2023-2025 1,047 118 205 39.0 48.0
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

Ocea
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Lincoln Av
enue
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Dupont Av
enue
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 52 72 39.8 46.1
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M ue
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0
ile
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in M
ile
s Stockton A

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

v enue
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 50
M !
SPB01

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av
94.3° (East)

nu e

n
s enue

Avenue
North Ocea
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
M
ile
Lafayette A

nue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue
70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
M

Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 2: Atlantic Shores

ile n
s N Street

156
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

enue
Northeast
ue
90

• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M

.3°
st)
ile

Central Av
Construction (2025-2027) added to Scenario 1 (Ocean Wind,
s

we

(So
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant M Street
10
0

h
M
ile

uth
ut
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s

Empire Wind, Empire Wind II, Atlantic Shores South)

So
Northwest

-so
L Street

°(
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

8.3

uth
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

21
K Street

eas
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
°

) t
screening features. J Street
0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed
I Street 0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #1

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

e
n Terrac
Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore
2023-2025 1,047 118 205 39.0 48.0
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

Ocea
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Lincoln Av
enue
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Dupont Av
enue
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 52 72 39.8 46.1
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M ue
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0
ile
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in M
ile
s Stockton A

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

v enue
Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 0 80 Not Visible Not Visible
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 50
M !
SPB01

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av
94.3° (East)

nu e

n
s
US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and enue

Avenue
North Ocea
County, New Jersey
2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
0490) M
ile
Lafayette A

nue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue
Atlantic Shores Offshore
2025-2030 1,047 157 164 19.3 42.2 70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position. Wind North (OCS-A 0549) ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible M

Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 3: 2024-2030 Project

ile n
s N Street

156
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

enue
Northeast
ue
90
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M

.3°
by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible

st)
ile

Central Av
construction added after the construction of Atlantic Shores
s
(OCS-A 0544)

we

(So
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant M Street
10
0
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A

h
M
ile

uth
ut
by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s

South (Full Lease Build-out Including Atlantic Shores South)

0537)

So
Northwest

-so
L Street

°(
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, Attentive Energy (OCS-A

8.3

uth
by 2030 853 7 101 42.4 43.9
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0538)

21
K Street

eas
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

°
by 2030 853 13 148 41.8 43.8

) t
screening features. 0539) J Street
Atlantic Shores Offshore
by 2030 853 17 95 39.5 43.9 0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541) Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed Invenergy Wind Offshore I Street 0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible
panorama
(OCS-A 0542) Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #1

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

e
n Terrac
Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification.
Ocean Wind (OCS-A 0498) 2024-2025 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

Ocea
Lincoln Av
enue
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction Empire Wind (OCS-A 0512) 2023-2027 951 52 72 39.8 46.1
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Dupont Av
enue
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
Empire Wind II (OCS-A 0512) 2025-2027 951 6 104 44.6 46.0
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M ue
Skipjack (OCS-A 0519) 2024-2030 853 0 33 Not Visible Not Visible
ile
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures, Garden State (OCS-A 0482) 2023-2030 853 0 80 Not Visible Not Visible
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in US Wind (OCS-A 0489 and
M
ile
s Stockton A

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

v enue
2024 938 0 101 Not Visible Not Visible
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 0490) 50
M !
SPB01

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av
94.3° (East)

nu e

n
s
Atlantic Shores Offshore enue

Avenue
North Ocea
County, New Jersey
2025-2030 1,047 157 164 19.3 42.2
assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
Wind North (OCS-A 0549) M
ile
Lafayette A

nue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue
Ocean Wind II (OCS-A 0532) 2026-2030 906 0 111 Not Visible Not Visible 70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
by 2030 853 0 104 Not Visible Not Visible M

Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 4: Full buildout of all

ile n
(OCS-A 0544) s N Street

156
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

enue
Northeast
ue
90
Ocean Wind East (OCS-A
• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M

.3°
by 2030 853 0 82 Not Visible Not Visible

st)
ile

Central Av
lease areas without Atlantic Shores South
s
0537)

we

(So
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant M Street
10
0
Attentive Energy (OCS-A

h
M
ile

uth
ut
by 2030 853 7 101 42.4 43.9
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.
s
0538)

So
Northwest

-so
L Street

°(
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height, Bight Wind Holdings (OCS-A

8.3

uth
by 2030 853 13 148 41.8 43.8
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number 0539)

21
K Street

eas
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape Atlantic Shores Offshore

°
by 2030 853 17 95 39.5 43.9

) t
screening features. Wind Bight (OCS-A 0541) J Street
Invenergy Wind Offshore
by 2030 853 0 99 Not Visible Not Visible 0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should (OCS-A 0542) Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed
I Street 0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet
 MATCH LINE SPB01 PANO #1

Notes: State Hig

hway Sumner Av
Potential Total Theoretical Theoretical Key Observation Point Context Key Observation Point Location
37 e enu
• Photosimulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images should be viewed from 18 inches in order

l
Avenue
East Centra
to obtain the proper perspective. For on-screen viewing, user should zoom in until the 1-inch scale Max Blade Number Number Distance Distance
Year of Webster A
ve nue
equals exactly one inch when measured on the screen. Project Tip Height of WTGs & of WTGs to Nearest to Furthest
Development
(feet) OSSs Visible & OSSs in Visible WTG Visible WTG
Key Observation Point
Hamilton
!

• Offshore Substation location and dimensions are based on preliminary publicly available project data.

venue
vard
Avenue
Cone of View

Projects for which this data is not currently available, WTGs are used for all foundation positions. OSS from KOP* Project (miles) (miles)

Bay Boule

e
n Terrac
Barnegat A
Franklin Av
enue
positions and dimensions considered in this photosimulation are subject to potential modification. Atlantic Shores Offshore
2023-2025 1,047 118 205 39.0 48.0
• WTG positions in the photosimulations are based on a refraction value of 7/6 or an approximate

Ocea
Wind South (OCS-A 0499) Lincoln Av
enue
0.14 coefficient derived from observations of the constructed Block Island Wind Farm. This refraction
coefficient may yield more conservative visibility results (i.e. greater turbine visibility) that the viewshed Dupont Av
enue
analysis results which use a refraction coefficient of 0.13.
Appendix A: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Cumulative
10
M
ile
s
• WTG tower, blades, and nacelle use the BOEM and FAA required color RAL 9010. The base and platform 20 Central Avenue
Porter Ave

Photosimulations
n
use RAL 1023 in accordance with USCG regulations.
M
ile ue
s

• *The number of WTGs visible from the KOP was determined by human verified computer generated 30

levard
M Farragut A
ile v enue
counts performed in the 3D camera views considering screening resulting from vegetation, structures,
s
40

Ocean Bou
curvature of the earth and refraction. This count may vary from the actual number of WTGs visible in M
ile
s Stockton A

SPB01: Seaside Park Beach, Seaside Park Borough, Ocean

v enue
the respective views due to masking completed during post processing which may include people, 50
M !
SPB01

waves, boats, or other minor obstructions that appear in the photograph. Additionally, the WTG counts
ile Decatur Av
94.3° (East)

nu e

n
s enue

Avenue
North Ocea
County, New Jersey assumed the WTG blades are in the upright position whereas the photosimulations assume a random
60

yview Ave
M
ile
Lafayette A

ue
s

rotation pattern. Considering the largest WTG in the cumulative array, this could account for up to 236
venue

n
70

Central Ave
M
ft. (72 m) in lost maximum height depending on the rotation position.
ile

Ba
Lake A v e
s
O Street
• The cone of view indicated on the Key Observation Point Context map indicates the horizontal extent of
80
M

Photosimulation (Panorama 2): Scenario 5: Atlantic Shores

ile n
s N Street

156
view only and does not indicate the extent of WTG visibility.

enue
Northeast
ue
90

• The resolution of the cumulative photosimulations balances the size and usability of the documents with
M

.3°
st)
ile

Central Av
South without the construction of other foreseeable planned
s

we

(So
the need for high resolution to see distant project components. Similarly to human vision, very distant M Street
10
0

th
M
ile

uth
turbines may appear blurry or difficult to decipher due to resolution limitations.

ou
s

activities

(S
Northwest

-so
L Street
• The Key Observation Point Context map considers screening by curvature of the earth, viewer height,

.3°

uth
8
and turbine height. Landscape screening features are not considered. Therefore, in this view, the number

21
K Street

eas
of visible turbines depicted on the map may not match the table due to the presence of landscape
°

t)
screening features. J Street
0 50 100 200

Simulation Size: 66” in width by 29.3” in height. Images This box should
Meters
should be viewed from a distance of 18 inches be exactly 1” long
on the printed
I Street 0 250 500 1,000
in order to obtain the proper perspective. panorama Feet