Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peaceful Settlement of Disputes Diplomacy Balance of Power
Peaceful Settlement of Disputes Diplomacy Balance of Power
The peaceful settlement of disputes is a crucial component of international relations and plays a
significant role in maintaining global harmony
o Pacific means are peaceful methods of resolving disputes, such as negotiation, good
offices, inquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, and regional
agencies/authorities.
o Compulsive means are forceful methods of resolving disputes, such as complaints,
reprisal, hostile embargo, blockade, intervention, and war.
The United Nations Charter (UN Charter) outlines these two dispute-resolution methods in
Chapters VI and VII. Chapter VI of the UN Charter lists the pacific means of dispute resolution,
while Chapter VII lists the compulsive means of dispute resolution.
The pacific means of dispute resolution are generally preferred over the compulsive means of
dispute resolution. Because they are more likely to lead to a peaceful and lasting resolution.
However, the compulsive means of dispute resolution may be necessary in some cases, such as
when a party to a dispute is unwilling to resolve the dispute peacefully.
o Conclusion
o The peaceful settlement of disputes is the cornerstone of international law and essential
to maintaining global peace and stability. Aspiring civil servants should familiarize
themselves with the principles, methods, and institutions involved in peaceful dispute
resolution. Understanding these concepts will enable them to analyze complex
international situations and contribute to developing effective diplomatic strategies to
resolve conflicts peacefully.
Diplomacy
Diplomacy is defined as the art and practice of negotiation and conducting dialogues through
different measures between states, groups, or people to influence the international system’s
decisions, events, and behaviors. It is undertaken to promote peace among nations and avoid
a state of war or violence.
In ancient times, diplomacy referred to the conduct of formal (often bilateral) ties between
sovereign governments. By the 20th century, European diplomatic practices had spread
throughout the globe, and the definition of diplomacy had expanded to include summit
meetings, international conferences, multilateralism, the international endeavors of
supranational and subnational organizations, unofficial diplomacy by nongovernmental
actors, and the performance of international civil servants.
Functions of Diplomacy
Diplomacy is conducted by diplomats. All the functions of diplomacy are performed by them.
The functions of diplomacy include the state’s representation and negotiation, the gathering
of information, and the promotion of peaceful ties between nations. The following are the
functions of diplomacy, and how are these performed;
As a result of the successful negotiations, the parties signed the Diplomatic Agreement. The
formal type of this agreement is called a Treaty which is a written contract between states or
nations. For example; the signing of the Treaty of Versailles ended the First World War
officially.
In some negotiations, one side does not agree to compromise and refuses to act upon the
common agenda set between two parties. In such cases, the third parties involved in the
process of negotiation put diplomatic sanctions on the state which refuses to be a part of
negotiations.
This led to diplomatic tensions among states and the reduction and expulsion of the
diplomatic staff from the offending nation as part of diplomatic sanctions. It may also include
the president’s refusal to meet the leaders of an offending country or visit that particular
country. For example, in 2010, Nicaragua suspended all diplomatic ties with Israel.
Types of Diplomacy
Modern-day diplomacy is open and transparent diplomacy as compared to secretive and
covert traditional diplomacy. With the revolution in time, diplomacy has evolved into different
kinds and types. There are many types of diplomacy, some of which are mentioned below:
• Public Diplomacy
• Economic Diplomacy
• Cultural Diplomacy
• Science Diplomacy
• Cyber Diplomacy
• Energy Diplomacy
• Regional Diplomacy
• Education Diplomacy
• Health Diplomacy
• Sport Diplomacy
1) Public Diplomacy
Public diplomacy is a type of diplomacy that emphasizes interacting with foreign citizens in
order to develop bonds and influence the opinion of the public. It is a type of soft power that
involves fostering ties and understanding between nations through cultural, economic, and
educational exchanges. Public diplomacy can also involve reaching out to foreign audiences
through the media and other kinds of communication.
2) Economic Diplomacy
Economic diplomacy is using the entire spectrum of a state’s economic resources to advance
its national interests. It entails advancing a nation’s interests abroad by employing economic
means like trade, investment, finance, and development assistance. Economic diplomacy is
used to encourage global cooperation, job creation, and economic prosperity. It can also be
used to settle conflicts and improve diplomatic ties between nations.
3) Cultural Diplomacy
Cultural diplomacy is the sharing of ideas, art, data and information, and other elements of
culture among nations and their inhabitants in order to improve mutual understanding. The
goal of cultural diplomacy is to increase public support for political and economic objectives
by helping citizens of a foreign country become familiar with its principles and institutions.
Cultural diplomacy, in essence, reveals the character of a nation which in turn generates
influence. Despite being frequently disregarded, cultural diplomacy can and does contribute
significantly to attaining national security objectives.
4) Science Diplomacy
Science diplomacy is the use of science and technology to foster international collaboration
and create bridges between nations. It includes tackling global issues like food security,
climate change, and pandemics, utilizing scientific research, technology, and expertise.
Moreover, science diplomacy encourages international scientific cooperation and the
exchange of information and resources.
5) Cyber Diplomacy
Cyber diplomacy refers to the use of electronic communication and technology to advance
diplomacy and foreign affairs. It includes using technological tools like social media, websites,
and other online platforms to conduct diplomatic debates, develop connections, and advance
global collaboration. Global challenges like data privacy, cyber security, and digital
infrastructure can be addressed through cyber diplomacy.
6) Energy Diplomacy
Energy diplomacy is the use of diplomatic relationships to advance and defend nations’
interests in the energy industry. It entails both the negotiation of international treaties on
energy-related matters and the management of national energy policy. Promoting energy
security, lowering energy poverty, and fostering sustainable energy development are all part
of energy diplomacy.
7) Regional Diplomacy
Regional diplomacy is the conduct of relations between nations that are part of a specific
geographical area. Regional diplomacy is now a significant player in world affairs. All states
understand the importance and value of neighborhood interaction due to interdependence
and globalization.
8) Education Diplomacy
Education diplomacy is the making use of education to advance international relations and
advance intercultural understanding. It incorporates international faculty, students, and idea
exchanges as well as the establishment of educational programs that encourage cooperation
and understanding across national boundaries. Using educational tools to assist global
development objectives is a vital form of diplomacy.
9) Health Diplomacy
Health diplomacy employs diplomatic techniques to address issues in global health such as
pandemics, healthcare access, and health equity. International collaboration is also a
component of health diplomacy to enhance outcomes in global health. For example, during
Covid -19, states collectively worked to make vaccines to cure Covid, as well as states send
vaccines to each other to fight against the global pandemic.
Future of Diplomacy
The world experienced an important transformation as a result of the digital revolution. The
internet and computer systems made it feasible to communicate written messages in a
matter of seconds and to have rapid access to new information. A defining aspect of the 21st
century is the development of mobile technology, which enables people to access the internet
without needing to sit in front of a computer. Social networking sites like Facebook,
Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram have helped develop the digital era.
In these times of digitalization, the tacts of diplomacy are also different. Diplomacy has
evolved to cyber diplomacy which is also known as digital diplomacy and e- diplomacy. These
terms show the relationship between the internet and diplomacy. The world will be shaped
by rapidly evolving digital geopolitics. With the modern revolution, modern conflicts also
evolved, such as disinformation, cyber conflict, cyber warfare, and hybrid warfare.
The protection of satellites and submarine cables, the manufacturing of semiconductors, and
the unrestricted flow of data will be the three main focuses of digital geopolitics. So in order
to build and maintain peace between states, and in the international system, digital diplomacy
will be practiced.
“Balance of Power is such a system in which some nations regulate their power relations
without any interference by any big power. As such it is a decentralized system in which power
and policies remain in the hands of constituting units.” —Inis Claude
1. Some Sort of Equilibrium in Power Relations:- The term Balance of Power suggests
‘equilibrium which is subject to constant, ceaseless change. In short, though it stands for
equilibrium, it also involves some disequilibrium. That is why scholars define it as a just
equilibriums or some sort of equilibrium in power relations.
4. Favours Status quo: Balance of power favours status quo in power positions of major
powers. It seeks to maintain a balance in their power relations. However, in order to be
effective, a foreign policy of balance of power must be changing and dynamic.
5. The Test of BOP is War: A real balance of power seldom exists. The only test of a balance
is war and when war breaks out the balance comes to an end. War is a situation which balance
of power seeks to prevent and when it breaks out, balance power comes to an end.
6. Not a Device of Peace: Balance of Power is not a primary device of peace because it admits
war as a means for maintaining balance.
7. Big Powers as Actors of BOP: In a balance of power system, the big states or powerful
states are the players. The small states or less powerful states are either spectators or the
victims of the game.
8. Multiplicity of States as an Essential Condition: Balance of Power system operates when
there are present a number of major powers, each of which is determined to maintain a
particular balance or equilibrium in their power relations.
9. National Interest is its Basis: Balance of Power is a policy that can be adopted by any
state. The real basis that leads to this policy is national interest in a given environment.
In contemporary times, Balance of Power has lost much of its utility due to several changes
in the international relations. The following changes in the international relations as well as
in the traditional balance of power system have adversely affected the role and relevance of
Balance of Power as a device of power management in International politics.
(1) End of the era of European Domination and the dawn of era of Global Politics:- The
structure of international politics has undergone a radical change from the classical period.
From a narrow European dominated international system it has come to be a truly global
system in which Asian, African and Latin American states enjoy a new and added importance.
Today Europe is no longer the centre of world politics. European politics constitutes only one
small segment of international politics. This changes has considerably reduced the operation
ability of balance of power.
3. The Bipolarity of Cold War period and the new era of Unipolarity: The bipolarity
(presence of two super powers and their blocs) that emerged in the cold war period reduced
the flexibility of the international system. It reduced the chances of balance of power whose
working requires the existence of flexibility in power relations, alliances and treaties.
Presently unipolarity characterizes the international system.
4.The End of the Era of Colonialism and Imperialism: Another big change in the structure
of balance of power has been the disappearance of imperialism and colonialism: It has limited
the scope for the exercise of power by the European powers, who in the past always worked
as the key players of the principle Balance of Power.
5. Disappearance of the “Balancer”: The rise of two super powers the disappearance of the
“holder of balance” or the “balancer” considerably reduced the chances of balance of power
politics during 1945-91. Traditionally, Britain used to play such a role in Europe. The sharp
and big decline in the power of Britain in the post-war period compelled it to abandon its role
of balancer between the two super powers. No other nation or even a group of nations was
successful in acting as a balancer between the USA and the (erstwhile) USSR. The absence of
a balancer further reduced the role of balance of power in post-war international relations.
6.The Emergence of Global Actors: The rise of the United Nations and several other
international and regional actors in international relations has given a new looked to the
international relations of our times. The presence of the UN has made a big change in the
structure and functioning of the international system. With a provision for collective security
of international peace and security, the United Nations constitutes a better source of peace.
Due to all these changes in international relations,
Balance of Power has come to suffer a big decline. It has definitely lost much of its relevance.
In contemporary times, Balance of Power has ceased to be a fully relevant and credible
principle of international relations. However, it still retains a presence in international
relations, more particularly, in the sphere of regional relations among states.