Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes of Management Concepts
Notes of Management Concepts
Who is a manager?
A manager is someone who works with and through other people to coordinate work
activities to achieve the organizational objectives.
Define management
• Efficient: getting the most output from the least amount of input
What is an organization?
Management levels
There are three levels of management
First line managers supervise the work activities of non managerial staff who are
directly involved in the process of producing goods and services
PREPARED BY: MUHAMMAD IRFAN MALIK MBA FEDERAL
URDU UNIVERSITY
3 MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
Middle managers are product, line, divisional and branch their work is to supervise
first line managers.
Top management takes organizational and major decisions that effect the whole
organization i.e. which business to enter, product launch and deals with the
competition.
Management roles
A manager performs the following three roles
Interpersonal roles: Involve people and other duties that are symbolic.
Figurehead: manager is a symbolic head of the org.
Liaison: to maintain contacts between insiders and outsiders and within the
organization department.
Management skills:
There are three types of skills
Technical skills:
Human skills
The ability to work well with the people both individually and in groups
Conceptual skills
The ability to think and conceptualize about complex and abstract (none existing)
situation
System perspective
Different interrelated and interdependent parts working together to achieve a
particular.
Open system: system that interacts with the environment, take input and sometimes
output to produce goods
Close system
Contingency perspective
A view that says the organizations are different and face different situations therefore
they require different ways of management.
Universality of management
A view that says management is required in all types of organizations, all sizes of
organization, in all organizational areas and at all levels of organization
Management theories
• Scientific management
• Quantitative approach
Scientific management
Principles of scientific management
Fredrick Taylor observed the workers for 20 years and find out the inefficiency that is
why it is called the scientific management. Scientific selection means ability and job
requirements should match and training means match ability and than train. Frenk
and Lillian captured the workers and decrease the work activities. Scientific
management focuses on the efficiency of lower level
Division of work: dividing a complete job into narrow and repetitive components.
Unity of command: each employee should report to one superior there should be
one boss for all subordinates.
Scalar chain;
Stability of tenure of personnel: labor tenure should be stable; labor turnover rate
should be low.
Max Weber
Quantitative approach
Decision making
Define the decision making
a. Weak advertisement
c. Tough competition
d. Price increase
➢ What cost
➢ What slogan
A 7 2 4 1
B 3 8 5 1
C 8 7 3 1
A 35 20 16 4 75
B 15 80 20 4 119
C 40 70 12 4 126
Bounded rationality
Behavior that is rational within the parameters of simplified decision making process
which is limited or bounded by an individual’s ability to process information.
Structured problems: clear, straight forward, familiar, simple and well defined
problems
Unstructured problems: a problem that is not familiar and rarely faced by the
organizations is called unstructured problem
Decisions:
Non program decision: decision that need to be defined for a specific problem.
Planning
The process of determining objectives, establishing an overall strategy to achieve
the objectives and creating a set of plans to coordinate organizational work, At least
four years of plans should be planed in advance. The two important things of
planning are goal and plan. Goal is the desired outcome whereas plan is a
document that outlines how goals are going to be achieved including resource
allocation, scheduling necessary actions to achieve organizational goals.
Types of goals:
PREPARED BY: MUHAMMAD IRFAN MALIK MBA FEDERAL
URDU UNIVERSITY
11 MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
Purpose of planning;
➢ Gives directions: each member of the organization knows the rules and
regulations and the goals are very clearly set
➢ Reduce uncertainty: one can not prevent himself from the environment,
planning identifies the changes in the environment and that expected change
can be tackled.
Strategic plans: plans that apply to the entire organization and seek to position the
organization in terms of its environment.
Operational plans: plans that specify the details that how overall goals are to be
achieved.
Time frame
Long term: the plans which are for three or more years are long term plans.
Specifically
Frequency of use
PREPARED BY: MUHAMMAD IRFAN MALIK MBA FEDERAL
URDU UNIVERSITY
12 MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
Single use: plans that are created to meet the needs of a unique situation
Standing use: plans that are used to guide the activities that are performed
repeatedly, they look the whole organization.
• Performance feedback
• Goals specific
• Written:
The goals and plan should be in black and white. Written plans are evidence
and when you write you conceptualize more.
• Challenging:
The time should be clearly stated that in what period we want to achieve our
goals if the time is not clear we can not measure the performance.
Outcome is what we want to attain what to we want to get. The goals should
state the outcomes rather actions.
Environment uncertainty:
Directional plans
Criticism on planning:
Creates rigidity:
Can not be planed for an environment because the environment changes so fast
Reduce creativity:
PREPARED BY: MUHAMMAD IRFAN MALIK MBA FEDERAL
URDU UNIVERSITY
14 MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
Strategic management
The set of decisions and actions that determine long run performance of an
organization, strategy is an action taken in response to competitors.
Analyze the objectives whether they are measurable or not review the
strategies and mission statement
Weakness: any resource that an organization needs but does not possess or
activities do not performed well.
• Formulating strategies
• Implementing strategies
• Evaluating strategies:
Customers: who are the customers of the firm? Students, teachers, doctors
Product: which need of the customer to satisfy? What will be the product?
Concerns for growth and stability: searching new market for growth and stability
Business strategies
a. Corporate level strategies
b. Business level strategies
c. Functional level strategies
A strategy that determines how each SBU should compete in its industry.
Cost leadership: edge on the basis of cost, leader in the market, market leader.
Focus: in big market satisfy the smaller segment which is called niche marketing.
Any thing that sets a firm apart from its competitors design, service, unique strength
capability, unique resources, raw material, and technology may be the competitive
advantage of the firm.
Organizing
The process of determining what tasks to be done, which is to do them and where
the decisions are made
Organizational structure:
Formal framework through which jobs are divided, grouped and coordinated
PREPARED BY: MUHAMMAD IRFAN MALIK MBA FEDERAL
URDU UNIVERSITY
18 MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
Organization design:
Chain of command: the continuous line of authority that extends from top
organizational level to lower and classify who reports to whom
Span of control: the number of employees a manager can effectively and efficiently
manage is called span of control.
The degree to which lower level employees are involved in decision making or
actually make the decisions is called decentralization
Formulization
The degree to which jobs within the organization are standardized at the extent to
which employee behavior is guided by rules and procedures
• Environment:
Stable environment centralization unstable decentralization
• Nature of decision
If the decision is significant it should be centralized
• Skills of employees
Unskilled employees’ centralization, skilled employees’ decentralization
• Size of the company
Large size centralization, geographic decentralization
• Autocratic
Centralization
• Democratic
Decentralization
Organizational design:
Organic: adoptive, not strict, jobs not highly standardized, departments are not rigid,
decentralization.
Strategy: strategy is the means of achieving short term objectives in response to the
competitor. There are three strategies:
Technology:
Size:
Environmental uncertainty:
Leadership
A person who has followers is leader, the difference between a leader and a
manager is that the managers are appointed in contrast the leaders normally emerge
within a group. Leading is to influence people it can perform beyond the actions. All
the managers should be leader. Leader is someone who influences people and
managerial authority leadership is the process of influencing people towards the
achievement of a particular objective.
Characteristics of leadership
Trait theory:
Drive:
To exert high level of efforts, more needs of achievement and tireless efforts,
initiative.
Desire to lead:
A leader should be truthful, consistent in words and deeds and there should be a
relationship between leaders the followers.
Intelligence:
The processing capability of a leader should be very should have the quality of
interpreting information
Self confidence:
Must posses the knowledge about the company, industry, and technology
Behavioral theories
Autocratic style: a leader who centralize authority, dictate work methods and limit
employee participation
Lazes fair: a leader who gives a group a complete freedom to make decision and
complete the work in whatever way it saw fit. For example an assignment by the
teacher
Ohio State
a. Initiating structure: the extent to which a leader was likely to define and
structure his or her role and the roles of the followers in the search for goal
attainment.
b. Consideration (friendly leader): the extent to which the leader has job
relationships characterized by mutual trust and the group members ideas and
feelings
Managerial Grid
Situational theories
The degree to which members have trust, respect and confidence in their leader
Unfriendly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Friendly
Uncooperative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cooperative
Hostile 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Supportive
.... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ....
Guarded 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Open
The responses to these scales (usually 18-25 in total) are summed and averaged: a
high LPC score suggests that the leader has a human relations orientation, while
a low LPC score indicates a task orientation. Fiedler assumes that everybody's
least preferred coworker in fact is on average about equally unpleasant. But people
who are indeed relationship motivated, tend to describe their least preferred
coworkers in a more positive manner, e.g., more pleasant and more efficient.
Therefore, they receive higher LPC scores. People who are task motivated, on the
other hand, tend to rate their least preferred coworkers in a more negative manner.
Therefore, they receive lower LPC scores. So, the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC)
scale is actually not about the least preferred worker at all, instead, it is about the
person who takes the test; it is about that person's motivation type. This is so,
because, individuals who rate their least preferred coworker in relatively favorable
light on these scales derive satisfaction out of interpersonal relationship, and those
who rate the coworker in a relatively unfavorable light get satisfaction out of
successful task performance. This method reveals an individual's emotional reaction
to people they cannot work with. Critics point out that this is not always an accurate
measurement of leadership effectiveness.
Situational favorableness
According to Fiedler, there is no ideal leader. Both low-LPC (task-oriented) and high-
LPC (relationship-oriented) leaders can be effective if their leadership orientation fits
the situation. The contingency theory allows for predicting the characteristics of the
appropriate situations for effectiveness. Three situational components determine the
favorableness of situational control:
1. Leader-Member Relations, referring to the degree of mutual trust, respect and
confidence between the leader and the subordinates.
2. Task Structure, referring to the extent to which group tasks are clear and
structured.
3. Leader Position Power, referring to the power inherent in the leader's position
itself.
PREPARED BY: MUHAMMAD IRFAN MALIK MBA FEDERAL
URDU UNIVERSITY
24 MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
When there is a good leader-member relation, a highly structured task, and high
leader position power, the situation is considered a "favorable situation." Fiedler
found that low-LPC leaders are more effective in extremely favorable or unfavorable
situations, whereas high-LPC leaders perform best in situations with intermediate
favorability.
Leader-situation match and mismatch
Since personality is relatively stable, the contingency model suggests that improving
effectiveness requires changing the situation to fit the leader. This is called "job
engineering." The organization or the leader may increase or decrease task structure
and position power, also training and group development may improve leader-
member relations. In his 1976 book Improving Leadership Effectiveness: the
Leader Match Concept Fiedler (with Martin Chemers and Linda Maher) offers a self
paced leadership training program designed to help leaders alter the favorableness
of the situation, or situational control.
Examples
• Task-oriented leadership would be advisable in natural disaster, like a flood or
fire. In an uncertain situation the leader-member relations are usually poor,
the task is unstructured, and the position power is weak. The one who
emerges as a leader to direct the group's activity usually does not know
subordinates personally. The task-oriented leader who gets things
accomplished proves to be the most successful. If the leader is considerate
(relationship-oriented), they may waste so much time in the disaster, that
things get out of control and lives are lost.
• Blue-collar workers generally want to know exactly what they are supposed to
do. Therefore, their work environment is usually highly structured. The
leader's position power is strong if management backs their decision. Finally,
even though the leader may not be relationship-oriented, leader-member
relations may be extremely strong if they can gain promotions and salary
increases for subordinates. Under these situations the task-oriented style of
leadership is preferred over the (considerate) relationship-oriented style.
• The considerate (relationship-oriented) style of leadership can be appropriate
in an environment where the situation is moderately favorable or certain. For
example, when (1) leader-member relations are good, (2) the task is
unstructured, and (3) position power is weak. Situations like this exist with
research scientists, who do not like superiors to structure the task for them.
They prefer to follow their own creative leads in order to solve problems. In a
situation like this a considerate style of leadership is preferred over the task-
oriented
Low High
Relationshi High
p /
supportive S3 S2
behavior Low
participating Selling
S4 S1
Delegating Telling
Follower: R1: Low competence, low commitment / Unable and unwilling or insecure
Leader: High task focus, low relationship focus
When the follower cannot do the job and is unwilling or afraid to try, then the leader
takes a highly directive role, telling them what to do but without a great deal of
concern for the relationship. The leader may also provide a working structure, both
for the job and in terms of how the person is controlled.
The leader may first find out why the person is not motivated and if there are any
limitations in ability. These two factors may be linked, for example where a person
believes they are less capable than they should be may be in some form of denial
or other coping. They follower may also lack self-confidence as a result.
If the leader focused more on the relationship, the follower may become confused
about what must be done and what is optional. The leader thus maintains a clear
'does this' position to ensure all required actions are clear.
S2: Selling / Coaching
Follower: R2: Some competence, variable commitment / Unable but willing or
motivated
Leader: High task focus, high relationship focus
When the follower can do the job, at least to some extent, and perhaps is over-
confident about their ability in this, then 'telling' them what to do may demotivate
them or lead to resistance. The leader thus needs to 'sell' another way of working,
explaining and clarifying decisions.
The leader thus spends time listening and advising and, where appropriate, helping
the follower to gain necessary skills through coaching methods.
Note: S1 and S2 are leader-driven.
S3: Participating / Supporting
Follower: R3: High competence, variable commitment / Able but unwilling or
insecure
Leader: Low task focus, high relationship focus
When the follower can do the job, but is refusing to do it or otherwise showing
insufficient commitment, the leader need not worry about showing them what to do,
and instead is concerned with finding out why the person is refusing and thence
persuading them to cooperate.
There is less excuse here for followers to be reticent about their ability, and the key
is very much around motivation. If the causes are found then they can be
addressed by the leader. The leader thus spends time listening, praising and
otherwise making the follower feel good when they show the necessary
commitment.
S4: Delegating / Observing
Follower: R4: High competence, high commitment / Able and willing or motivated
Leader: Low task focus, low relationship focus
When the follower can do the job and is motivated to do it, then the leader can
basically leave them to it, largely trusting them to get on with the job although they
also may need to keep a relatively distant eye on things to ensure everything is
going to plan.
Followers at this level have less need for support or frequent praise, although as
with anyone, occasional recognition is always welcome.
Supportive leadership
Considering the needs of the follower, showing concern for their welfare and
creating a friendly working environment. This includes increasing the follower's
self-esteem and making the job more interesting. This approach is best when the
work is stressful, boring or hazardous.
Directive leadership
Telling followers what needs to be done and giving appropriate guidance along the
way. This includes giving them schedules of specific work to be done at specific
times. Rewards may also be increased as needed and role ambiguity decreased
(by telling them what they should be doing).
This may be used when the task is unstructured and complex and the follower is
inexperienced. This increases the follower's sense of security and control and
hence is appropriate to the situation.
Participative leadership
Consulting with followers and taking their ideas into account when making decisions
and taking particular actions. This approach is best when the followers are expert
and their advice is both needed and they expect to be able to give it.
Achievement-oriented leadership:
Setting challenging goals, both in work and in self-improvement (and often
together). High standards are demonstrated and expected. The leader shows faith
in the capabilities of the follower to succeed. This approach is best when the task is
complex.
Contingency factors:
• Environmental
• Work group
• Formal authority
• Task and structure
Follower’s personal trait
• Locus of control
• Perceived ability
• Experience
Leadership power:
Reward Power
This type of influence is created when the leader is able to offer a reward to his
followers for completing tasks/behaving in a certain manner. Rewards in the
workplace can take a variety of forms from chocolates, gift vouchers and holidays to
promotions, commission and pay rises. This reward will only be effective if ;
• Firstly - the reward appeals to the followers. As you are aware there is no
point offering chocolate as a reward to somebody that likes crisps. This is
because they will not view chocolate as a reward, so there is no incentive to
complete the task.
• Secondly – the followers have to believe that the leader will give them (or
arrange for them to receive) the reward promised once the task is completed
by them.
Thirdly – the reward should be proportionate to the task the follower has to
complete. For example it would be disproportionate to reward an employee
with a promotion for making a cup of tea. Similarly a follower would feel
undervalued, if rewarded with a £5 gift voucher after they spent six months
doing their managers job without a pay rise.
• The other reason why rewards should be offered carefully is that frequent use
can reduce the impact or influence that offering a reward initially had on the
follower. Followers will soon tire of the reward especially if the reward is small
for example chocolates or flowers.
Coercive Power
This is the opposite of reward power because this power is based on the leader
having control over what happens if followers do not act as required. If followers do
not undertake the action required, the leader will impose a penalty. Penalties take a
variety of forms including withdrawal of privileges, job losses, verbal abuse, and
delayed or loss of promotion. In all cases the leader will need to choose the penalty
carefully to prevent breaking the law or being the subject of an employment tribunal.
• Coercive power requires followers to believe that the leader has the ability to
impose the stated penalty. Also the penalty has to be something that the
followers do not want to have imposed on them. For example a penalty results
in coffee being banned is unlikely to influence a tea drinker.
Legitimate Power
This is the power that a leader has when the followers believe that the leader has “a
right” to instruct them and that they have an obligation to follow instructions.
Sometimes legitimacy power is created by the leader’s job title (such as captain,
doctor, or area manager), combined with the follower’s belief that the job title gives
the leader the right to give them orders.
Referent Power
This is created when the followers believe that the leader possess qualities that they
admire and would like to possess. The followers identify with their leader and attempt
to copy their leader. As referent power is dependant on how the follower views the
personality of their leader, a leader will not have referent power over every follower
they lead. Some leaders will have referent power over just a few, whilst others such
as Gandhi have lead millions through their personality and charisma.
Expert Power
As the title suggests a leader has expert power when the followers believe that the
leader has “expert” knowledge or skills that are relevant to the job or tasks they have
to complete. Often an experienced member of the team or staff in an organization
can have expert power even though they are not a supervisor or manager.
Controlling
PREPARED BY: MUHAMMAD IRFAN MALIK MBA FEDERAL
URDU UNIVERSITY
32 MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
Once the deviation is identified, a manager has to think about various cause
which has led to deviation. The causes can be-
a. Erroneous planning,
b. Co-ordination loosens,
4. Taking remedial actions- Once the causes and extent of deviations are
known, the manager has to detect those errors and take remedial measures
for it. There are two alternatives here-
PREPARED BY: MUHAMMAD IRFAN MALIK MBA FEDERAL
URDU UNIVERSITY
34 MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
Feed forward: when corrective measures are before the start of activity. E.g.
McDonalds train workers how to grow potatoes, it minimizes the wastage.
Concurrent: when the activity is in progress and the worker doing his work and he is
being controlled
Feedback: controlling measures are taken after the activity performed. E.g. income
statement
The management of any organization must develop a control system tailored to its
organization's goals and resources. Effective control systems share several common
characteristics. These characteristics are as follows:
• A focus on critical points. For example, controls are applied where failure
cannot be tolerated or where costs cannot exceed a certain amount. The
critical points include all the areas of an organization's operations that directly
affect the success of its key operations.
• Integration into established processes. Controls must function harmoniously
within these processes and should not bottleneck operations.
• Acceptance by employees. Employee involvement in the design of controls
can increase acceptance.
• Availability of information when needed. Deadlines, time needed to
complete the project, costs associated with the project, and priority needs are