Higher Nationals - Summative Assignment Feedback Form
Student Name/ID Eugene Serville
Unit Title Programming
Assignment Number Assignment 1
09/02/2024
Submission Date
Re-submission Date
Assessor Feedback:
Outcome
P1 – Define an algorithm and
outline the process in building
an application
P2 – Determine the steps taken
from writing code to execution.
M1 – Analyse the process of
writing code, including the
potential challenges faced.
D1– Evaluate the
implementation of an algorithm
in a suitable language and the
relationship between the written
algorithm and the code variant.
P3 – Discuss what procedural,
object-orientated and event-
driven paradigms are; their
characteristics and the
relationship between them.
M2 – Compare the procedural,
object-orientated and event-
driven paradigms used in given
source code of an application.
D2 – Critically evaluate the
source code of an application
that implements the procedural,
object-orientated and event-
driven paradigms, in terms of the
code structure and
characteristics.
General Comment
Assessor Samuel Williams
Date Received 09/02/2024
1st submission
Date Received 2nd
submission
Feedback Grade
The learner has included a good discussion on what an A
algorithm is along with examples. Good coverage of
efficiency using the big O notation. Good discussion on a
suitable language and how algorithms fit into the
development process. Good work.
Good coverage of the steps taken from writing to execution A
of the code when covering the application development
process.
The learner has produced a good discussion on common A
challenges that are faced when coding algorithms from
designs. Good work.
A good discussion has been produced on the relationship A
between the written algorithm and coded variant using an
example.
The learner has produced a good discussion on the A
characteristics of the different types of programming. Good
work.
A good comparison of the examples has been produced in a A
tabular format with good detail. Good work.
The examples have been well discussed and include relevant A
screenshots with explanations. Good work.
A good submission.
 Grade: P1, P2, P3 , M1, Assessor Signature: Samuel Williams Date: 19/02/2024
M2, D1, D2
Resubmission Feedback:
None Needed.

Grade: Assessor Signature: Date:

Internal Verifier’s Comments:

Signature & Date:

* Please note that grade decisions are provisional. They are only confirmed once internal and external moderation
has taken place and grades decisions have been agreed at the assessment board.

Pearson Education 2016

Higher Education Qualifications
Summative Assignment Feedback Form