Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Resonance of Spring - Kluster 2 - Emd4m2c
Resonance of Spring - Kluster 2 - Emd4m2c
Program : CEEM222
Course Title : APPLIED MECHANICS LAB
Course Code : MEC424
Instructor : PN. NURUL SYUHADAH BINTI KHUSAINI
LABORATORY REPORT
Members:
1. NOR FATYMA AINA BINTI FOUZI 2022490286
2. NUR ADIBAH BINTI ZAKARIA 2022478502
3. NUR AMIRAH BINTI MOHD RASHIDI 2023185445
4. NUR ASYIQIN BINTI SANUSI
2022495422
Marking Scheme
No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
1.0 ABSTRACT
All the machine and system vibrates on its own frequency when they are in periodic
oscillations phase in a central static equilibrium position. The intrinsic mass and elasticity
of any system or equipment can cause it to vibrate either on its own or at a different
frequency. To find the resonance of the Spring-Dashpot system under various manipulative
damping open and closed circumstances, an experiment will be conducted in this lab. Four
separate locations throughout the system will house the damper. Since the distances
between each damper point change, the amplitude will take on a distinct shape at each one.
To fulfil the experiment's goal, calculations for both the natural and external frequencies
will be made.
The experiment is study the for the spring-dashpot system where we to study the effect
of damping on the system. Through the experiment, we are to study the damped frequency
and relate it to the natural frequency as well study the occurrence of resonance and its effect
on the system. The experiment were carried out by using Control Unit to control the
Universal Vibration Systems Apparatus. The desired frequency was adjusted to 5 Hz to 14
Hz. The experiment were then repeated with the damper to off condition. The oscillation
were recorded with the mechanical recorder for oscillation with damper with length 150mm
and 550mm. The damper distance will give impact to the behaviour of the amplitude and
its value. The resonance occur when the applied frequency is same with natural frequency
of the object. The natural requency has also been calculated in order to achieve the
objectives. The knowledge of the calculating the resonance frequency and
natural frequency is very important in order to prevent catastrophic disaster.
2.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS
5.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 7
6.0 THEORY................................................................................................................. 8
10.0 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................... 24
Forced vibration arises from external forces acting upon a system, causing it to oscillate
at the frequency of the excitation. When the excitation frequency aligns with a natural
frequency of the system, resonance emerges, leading to potentially hazardous, amplified
oscillations. Structures such as buildings, bridges, and aircraft wings are susceptible to
collapse under resonance conditions. At resonance, the system experiences maximum
displacement, underscoring the criticality of natural frequency assessments in oscillation
studies. Vibrating systems inherently undergo damping, experiencing energy dissipation
due to factors like friction and resistance.
Damping minimally alters the system's natural frequency, thus natural frequency
measurements are generally conducted without consideration of damping effects. To
achieve this, it's necessary to identify resonance in the Spring-Dashpot System across
different damping scenarios to evaluate the associated risks. Concurrently, research into
strategies for mitigating and controlling resonance hazards can enhance safety and well-
being for human users, along with yielding various other benefits.
Vibrations can be detected through various means, such as by using musical instruments
like the ukulele. When the ukulele strings are plucked, they initiate vibrations at their
inherent frequency. This energy transfer to the instrument disrupts its particles, causing it
to vibrate at its natural frequency. Strumming the strings of a ukulele can similarly induce
vibrations in the soundbox, resulting in amplified sound production. The vibrations
generated by the soundbox cause air molecules within it to vibrate at the same frequency
as the strings, leading to a synchronized vibration of the entire ukulele structure. Force
vibration refers to an object's ability to induce vibrations in interconnected objects, a
principle that guides experimentation in this context.
6.0 THEORY
glass
Figure 1: Effect of resonance frequency to a glass.
Resonance manifests when the frequency of an external force aligns with one of the
inherent frequencies of a system, a phenomenon widely acknowledged. When an oscillating
force closely matches the "natural" frequencies of an object, it gives rise to what we term
as simple resonance. This can lead to significant outcomes, inducing considerable
oscillations. These intensified oscillations can be leveraged to amplify the amplitude of
oscillation within a specific body, finding utility across various applications. For instance,
when robust oscillations are applied to a bridge or another structural system, it may
experience its most pronounced deformation. The resultant effect, whether immediate or
delayed, is contingent upon material properties, loading conditions, and other influencing
factors.
Figure
Figure2:2:
Resonance frequency
Resonance frequency
Resonance occurs when the excitation frequency aligns with the fundamental
frequencies of the system. This synchronization leads to a phenomenon termed resonance,
wherein both frequencies harmonize, inducing a distinct and potent oscillation. The impact
of resonance amplifies as the two frequencies converge. At the resonance point, the
maximum amplitude of oscillation becomes evident, underscoring the importance of this
phenomenon.
7.0 APPARATUS & PROCEDURE
APPARATUS
1. Unbalance Exciter
2. Beam
3. Damper
4. Control Unit
5. Mechanical Recorder
6. Spring
7. Pen
8. Graph Recording Paper
PROCEDURE
Before start working;
1. Review the labsheet and manual thoroughly.
2. Activate both the main power supply and the Control Unit (TM150).
3. Ensure a clear understanding of the fundamental setup of the equipment.
4. Familiarize yourself with the safety procedures for the laboratory apparatus before
proceeding with the experiment.
While Working:
AFTER WORKING
1. Open the damper by using the provided Allen key to unscrew it.
2. Turn off both the main power supply and the Control Unit (TM150).
3. In case of any equipment damage during the experiment, promptly notify the
instructor for safety precautions, as the equipment will be utilized by subsequent
groups for conducting experiments.
8.0 RESULTS
0 0 0 0 0
5 0.45 0.55 0.65 0.50
l = 650mm @ 0.65m
Spring constant, k = 3.0N/mm @ 0.003N/m
Theoretical Result
a) Condition 1: No damped (650mm)
Angular natural frequency, 𝜔𝑛
3𝑘𝑙 2
𝜔𝑛 = √
𝐼0
3(3000)(0.65)2
𝜔𝑛 = √
2.452(0.7)2
56.26𝑟𝑎𝑑
𝜔𝑛 =
𝑠
Natural frequency, f
1
𝑓 = 2𝑛 𝜔𝑛
1
𝑓 = 2𝑛 (56.26)
𝑓 = 9.0𝐻𝑧
Period time, T
1
𝑇=𝑓
1
𝑇 = 9.0
𝑇 = 0.111𝑠
Unbalanced Force, 𝐹0
𝐹0 = 𝑢𝑛𝑏𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 × 𝑙 × 𝜔 2
𝐹0 = 0.772× 0.65 × (56.26)2
𝐹0 = 1.588𝑘𝑁
𝐼0 = 0.4𝑘𝑔𝑚2
Damping ratio,
𝑐𝑙 2
=
2𝑙 0𝜔𝑛
(5)(15)2
=
2 0.4)(56.26)
(
= 2.5 × 10−3
Natural frequency, 𝜔𝑛
𝜔𝑑 = 𝜔𝑛 √1 − 𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 2
𝜔𝑑 = (56.26)√1 − (2.5 × 10−3 )2
𝑟𝑎𝑑
𝜔𝑑 = 56.26
𝑠
(15)(0.15)2
= 2(0.4)(56.26)
= 7.5 × 10−3
Natural frequency, 𝜔𝑛
𝜔𝑑 = 𝜔𝑛 √1 − 𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 2
(15)(0.55)2
=
2(0.4)(56.26)
= 0.101
Natural frequency, 𝜔𝑛
𝜔𝑑 = 𝜔𝑛 √1 − 𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 2
𝜔𝑑 = (56.26)√1 − (0.101)2
𝑟𝑎𝑑
𝜔𝑑 = 55.97
𝑠
Experimental Result
𝜔𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 2𝜋𝑓𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙
𝜔𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 2𝜋8
50.26𝑟𝑎𝑑
𝜔𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝑠
0 0 0 0 0
5 0.45 31.41 56.26 0.56 1.588 0.85
6 0.50 37.70 0.67 0.94
7 0.95 43.98 0.78 1.79
8 1.55 50.27 0.89 2.93
8.1 2.0 50.89 0.90 3.78
8.2 2.5 51.52 0.91 4.72
8.3 3.05 52.15 0.93 5.76
8.4 4.0 52.78 0.94 7.56
8.5 8.75 53.41 0.95 16.53
8.6 12.0 54.03 0.96 22.67
8.7 7.55 54.66 0.97 14.26
8.8 6.25 55.29 0.98 11.8
8.9 3.25 55.92 0.99 6.14
9 2.75 56.55 1.005 5.2
10 2.0 62.83 1.12 3.78
11 1.50 69.11 1.23 2.83
12 1.0 75.40 1.34 1.89
13 0.95 81.68 1.45 1.79
14 0.75 87.96 1.56 1.42
0 0 0 0 0
5 0.55 31.41 0.56 1.04
6 3.05 37.70 0.67 5.76
7 2.75 43.98 0.78 5.20
8 1.45 50.27 0.89 2.74
8.1 1.4 50.89 56.26 0.90 1.588 2.6
8.2 1.35 51.52 0.91 2.55
8.3 1.25 52.15 0.93 2.36
8.4 1.2 52.78 0.94 2.27
8.5 1.15 53.41 0.95 2.17
8.6 1.05 54.03 0.96 1.98
8.7 1.0 54.66 0.97 1.9
8.8 1.0 55.29 0.98 1.9
8.9 1.0 55.92 0.99 1.9
9 1.0 56.55 1.005 1.9
10 0.95 62.83 1.12 1.79
11 0.85 69.11 1.23 1.61
12 0.65 75.40 1.34 1.23
13 0.55 81.68 1.45 1.04
14 0.50 87.96 1.56 0.94
c) Condition 3: Damped Closed (150mm)
Table 4: Damped Closed - 150mm
Frequency, Amplitudes, 𝜔 𝑥𝑘
𝜔 (rad/s) 𝜔𝑛 , (rad/s) 𝐹0 , (kN)
f (Hz) x (mm) 𝜔𝑛 𝐹0
0 0 0 0 0
5 0.65 31.41 0.56 1.23
6 3.5 37.70 0.67 6.61
7 2.5 43.98 0.78 4.72
8 1.5 50.27 0.89 2.83
8.1 1.45 50.89 0.90 2.74
8.2 1.4 51.52 0.91 2.64
8.3 1.35 52.15 0.93 2.55
8.4 1.3 52.78 0.94 2.46
8.5 1.1 53.41 0.95 2.08
56.26 1.588
8.6 1.05 54.03 0.96 1.98
8.7 1.05 54.66 0.97 1.98
8.8 1.05 55.29 0.98 1.98
8.9 1.0 55.92 0.99 1.90
9 1.0 56.55 1.05 1.90
10 0.9 62.83 1.12 1.70
11 0.8 69.11 1.23 1.51
12 0.75 75.40 1.34 1.42
13 0.65 81.68 1.45 1.23
14 0.55 87.96 1.56 1.04
d) Condition 4: Damped Closed (550mm)
Table 5: Damped Close - 550mm
Frequency, Amplitudes, 𝜔 𝑥𝑘
𝜔 (rad/s) 𝜔𝑛 , (rad/s) 𝐹0 , (kN)
f (Hz) x (mm) 𝜔𝑛 𝐹0
0 0 0 0 0
5 0.5 31.41 0.56 0.94
6 0.6 37.70 0.67 1.13
7 1.0 43.98 0.78 1.9
8 1.5 50.27 0.9 2.83
8.1 1.95 50.89 0.91 3.68
8.2 2.0 51.52 0.92 3.78
8.3 2 52.15 0.93 3.78
8.4 2 52.78 0.94 3.78
8.5 1.95 53.41 0.95 3.68
55.97 1.588
8.6 1.95 54.03 0.96 3.68
8.7 1.95 54.66 0.98 3.68
8.8 1.5 55.29 0.99 2.83
8.9 1.4 55.92 1 2.64
9 1.05 56.55 1.01 2.98
10 1.0 62.83 1.12 1.90
11 1.0 69.11 1.23 1.90
12 1.0 75.40 1.35 1.90
13 0.9 81.68 1.46 1.70
14 0.85 87.96 1.57 1.61
Percentage Error
a) Condition 1: No Damped (650mm)
𝜔𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 −𝜔𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙
𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | | × 100%
𝜔𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
56.26−50.26
𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | |× 100%
56.26
56.26−50.26
𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | | × 100%
56.26
55.97−50.26
𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = | 55.97
| × 100%
Graph Presentation
a) Condition 1: No Damped (650mm)
When the frequency exceeds the natural frequency, the graph of the findings begins to
fall. This decline occurs as the vibration gets more stable beyond the natural frequency of
the system. Furthermore, the experiment shows that vibrations are not present during
certain phases of the approach. This result implies that the damper's proximity to the
source of the disturbance absorbs the vibration, reducing its amplitude. Nonetheless, it is
essential to identify possible errors that could affect the experiment's findings. Systematic
and random errors could explain observed differences. For example, random mistakes
could occur due to the spring's elasticity, which may have reduced over time from its
original value because of repetitive use.
Variations in spring elasticity could cause the rod to oscillate during the experiment,
producing data inconsistencies. Precautions should be taken to improve the experiment's
accuracy, such as securing the pen and pen holder to ensure good graph recording.
10.0 CONCLUSION
11.0 REFERENCES
Beer, F., Johnston, E., Cornwell, P., & Self, B. (2015). Vector Mechanics for Engineers:
Dynamics (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (1998, July 20). Damping | Definition, Types, &
Examples. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/damping
6Hz6Hz
7Hz7Hz
Figure 67 Data Condition 4 - 8Hz Figure 69 Data Condition 4 - 8.2Hz Figure 71 Data Condition 4 - 8.4Hz