Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Complaint in Intervention - API
Complaint in Intervention - API
Complaint in Intervention - API
-vs-
COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION
Intervenor, alleges:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. This intervention is filed to affirm and assert the rights, claims and
settlement of the rights and interest of all the parties involved in the case,
since herein intervenor’s rights and interest, can be fully affirmed and
PARTIES
3. Intervenor, API AGRARIAN REFORM BENEFICIARIES MULTI-
duly organized and registered1 under the laws of the Republic of the
Philippines, with principal office at P-3, Manat, Trento, Agusan del Sur,
where it can be served with summons and other notices of this Court ;
respectively ;
ages, and residents of Sitio Macauli, Brgy. Basa, Trento, Agusan del Sur,
where they can be served with summons and other processes of this
Court ;
CAUSE OF ACTION
1
CDA No. 9520-13010132
6. That intervenor (API-ARB-MPC) and plaintiff (AGUSAN
7. That the land subject of the lease agreement has a total area of
9. By virtue of the said lease agreement, plaintiff has planted African Palm
10.That sometime on 2015, the herein plaintiff filed this action (Forcible
Entry) against the herein defendants claiming among other things that
lease agreement ;
11.In view of the refusal of the defendants to vacate the area and event
12.That on March 23, 2018, the herein Honorable Court handed down a
2
Lease Agreement
WHEREFORE, after a thorough perusal of the
facts and evidence in this case, this Court rules in
favour of the plaintiff and against defendants,
ordering the latter and all other persons claiming
rights under him to:
SO ORDERED.
xxx xxx
13.That the above decision having obtained finality, the herein Court issued
14.On March 2020, the herein intervenor devised a livelihood program for
plants and other fruit bearing trees in the unused portion of the area
15.That the said livelihood activity could not proceed because defendants
with the same conduct demonstrated in this case and by means of force
and strategy again entered some portion of the land where the banana
3
Order – Writ of Execution
4
Sheriff’s Report
16.That when the employees and agents of the herein intervenor went to the
the fact that he was directed by the intervenor’s through its officers to
and that the herein defendants threatened to inflict harm and thus hereby
18.That herein intervenors, being the owner of the land in question are
19.That despite demand for the defendants to stop their disturbance and
vacate the area, they refused and still continuous to prevent intervenor
and their agents from engaging their lawful activities and/or programs ;
20.That since the inception of this case, intervenor observed and witnessed
the antics of the defendants who acts with stealth and machination in
intruding into the property, hence the propriety of this intervention, to the
file and prosecute the above-captioned case, whom they promised to pay
22.In view of the unjustified refusal of defendant, intervenor have spent and
amount of P200,000.00 ;
PERMITTED to intervene in the case, in order to affirm and assert the rights,
claims and interests of the workers and that accordingly, judgment be rendered in
their favor:
2. Pay the legal fees in the amount of P50,000.00, with P5,000.00 per
San Francisco, (for Trento) Agusan del Sur this 17th day of August 2020.
ALVIZO and MONTILLA LAW OFFICES
2/F Tiu Bldg. Obedoza St., Brgy. 2
San Francisco, Agusan del Sur
By: