Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download PDF of Test Bank For Supply Chain Logistics Management, 4th Edition: Donald Bowersox All Chapter
Full Download PDF of Test Bank For Supply Chain Logistics Management, 4th Edition: Donald Bowersox All Chapter
https://testbankmall.com/product/solution-manual-for-supply-
chain-logistics-management-bowersox-closs-cooper-4th-edition/
https://testbankmall.com/product/test-bank-for-supply-chain-
logistics-management-5th-by-bowersox/
https://testbankmall.com/product/solution-manual-for-supply-
chain-logistics-management-5th-by-bowersox/
https://testbankmall.com/product/test-bank-for-global-logistics-
and-supply-chain-management-3rd-edition/
Supply Chain Management A Logistics Perspective 10th
Edition Coyle Test Bank
https://testbankmall.com/product/supply-chain-management-a-
logistics-perspective-10th-edition-coyle-test-bank/
https://testbankmall.com/product/supply-chain-management-a-
logistics-perspective-10th-edition-coyle-solutions-manual/
https://testbankmall.com/product/test-bank-for-supply-chain-
management-a-logistics-perspective-9th-edition-by-coyle/
https://testbankmall.com/product/solution-manual-for-business-
logistics-supply-chain-management-5-e-ronald-h-ballou/
https://testbankmall.com/product/introduction-to-operations-and-
supply-chain-management-4th-edition-bozarth-test-bank/
Chapter 02 – Logistics
2-8 The primary reason that total logistics cost has reduced as a percentage of GDP is:
A – Inventory has increased as a percent of total cost
B – Inventory has decreased as a percent of total cost**
C – Transportation has decreased as a percent of total cost
D – Nominal GDP has increased
2-11 Logistics cost has declined as a percent of GDP over the past 25 years (True)
2-13 Total cost was not typically the way managers viewed logistics prior to the 1960’s
(True)
2-14 The logistics value proposition is based solely on cost minimization (False)
2-15 The work of logistics is all about transportation planning and execution (False)
2-17 Transportation cost drives a firm’s focus on speed and consistency (False)
2-18 Facility network design is the function of total cost minimization (False)
2-19 Procurement and manufacturing are an integral part of integrated logistics. (False)
2-2
Chapter 02 – Logistics
2-3
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Fig. 77. Portion of a Calamite stem, showing the surface of the bark, c;
the wood, b; the surface of the pith-cast, a. N.1-N.3. Nodes. R. Root.
(After Grand’Eury. Partially restored from a specimen in the École des
Mines, Paris.) ¾ nat. size.
PERIDERM IN STEMS.
b. Leaves
Leaves of Calamites and Calamitean foliage-shoots, including an account of (α)
Calamocladus (Asterophyllites) and (β) Annularia.
α. Calamocladus (Asterophyllites).
The generic name Asterophyllites was proposed by Brongniart[641]
in 1822 for a fossil previously named by Schlotheim[642] Casuarinites,
and afterwards transferred to Sternberg’s genus Annularia. In 1828
Brongniart[643] gave the following diagnosis of the fossils which he
included under the genus Asterophyllites:—“Stems rarely simple,
usually branched, with opposite branches, which are always
disposed in the same plane; leaves flat, more or less linear, pointed,
traversed by a simple median vein, free to the base.” Lindley and
Hutton described examples of Brongniart’s genus as species of
Hippurites[644], and other authors adopted different names for
specimens afterwards referred to Asterophyllites.
At a later date Ettingshausen[645] and other writers expressed the
view that the fossils which Brongniart regarded as a distinct genus
were the foliage-shoots of Calamites, and Ettingshausen went so far
as to include them in that genus. In view of the generally expressed
opinion as to the Calamitean nature of Asterophyllites, Schimper[646]
proposed the convenient generic name Calamocladus for “rami et
ramuli foliosi” of Calamites. Some recent authors have adopted this
genus, but others prefer to retain Asterophyllites. In a recent
important monograph by Grand’Eury[647] Calamitean foliage-shoots
are included under the two names, Asterophyllites and
Calamocladus; the latter type of foliage-shoots he associates with
the stems of the subgenus Calamodendron, and the former he
connects with those Calamitean stems which belong to the
subgenus Arthropitys.
It is an almost hopeless task to attempt to connect the various
forms of foliage-shoots with their respective stems, and to determine
what particular anatomical features characterised the plants bearing
these various forms of shoots. We may adopt Schimper’s generic
name Calamocladus in the same sense as Asterophyllites, but as
including such other foliage-shoots as we have reason to believe
belonged to Calamites. Those leaf-bearing branches which conform
to the type known as Annularia are however not included in
Calamocladus, as we cannot definitely assert that these foliage-
shoots belong in all cases to Calamitean stems. Grand’Eury’s use of
Calamocladus in a more restricted sense is inadvisable as leading to
confusion, seeing that this name was originally defined in a more
comprehensive manner as including Calamitean leaf-bearing
branches generally. We may define Calamocladus as follows:—
Branched or simple articulated branches bearing whorls of uni-
nerved linear leaves at the nodes; the leaves may be either free to
the base or fused basally into a cup-like sheath (e.g. Grand’Eury’s
Calamocladus). The several acicular linear leaves or segments
which are given off from the nodes spread out radially in an open
manner in all directions; they may be either almost at right angles to
the axis or inclined at different angles. Each segment is traversed by
a single vein and terminates in an acuminate apex.
As a typical example of a Calamitean foliage-shoot the species
Calamocladus equisetiformis (Schloth.) may be briefly described.
The synonymy of the commoner species of fossil plants is a constant
source of confusion and difficulty; in order to illustrate the necessity
of careful comparison of specimens and published illustrations, it
may be helpful to quote a few synonyms of the species more
particularly dealt with. The exhaustive lists drawn up by Kidston in
his Catalogue of Palaeozoic plants in the British Museum will be
found extremely useful by those concerned with a systematic study
of the older plants.
Fig. 87. Calamocladus equisetiformis (Schloth.).
From a specimen in the British Museum (McMurtrie Collection, no. v.
2963). ca. ⅓ nat. size.
The above synonyms do not exhaust the list[655], but they suffice to
illustrate the necessity of a careful comparison in drawing up tables
of species, in connection with geographical distribution or for other
purposes.
Calamocladus equisetiformis may be briefly defined as follows:—A
central axis possessing a hollow pith of Calamitean character,
divided externally into well-marked slightly constricted nodes and
internodes; from the nodes long narrow and free leaves are borne in
whorls; from the axils of some of the leaves lateral branches are
given off inclined at a fairly wide angle to the main axis, and bearing
crowded verticils of spreading acicular leaves.
The unusually good specimen, 38·5 cm. long, shown on a much
reduced scale in fig. 87, illustrates the characteristic habit of this
form of Calamocladus. It is from the Radstock coal-field of
Somersetshire, one of the best English localities for Coal-Measure
plants. An exceedingly good collection of Radstock plants has
recently been presented to the British Museum by Mr J. McMurtrie; it
includes many fine specimens of Calamites. A small example—
probably of this species—from Coalbrook Dale, near Dudley, in
Shropshire, and now in the British Museum, illustrates very well the
appearance of a young and partially expanded Calamitean foliage-
shoot. The central axis, 6·5 cm. in length, includes about 15
internodes, and terminates in a bud covered by several small leaves.
Lateral branches are given off at a wide angle, and small
unexpanded buds occur in the axils of several of the leaves.
As an example of the leaf-bearing branches which Grand’Eury has
recently described as Calamocladus, using the genus in a more
restricted sense than is adopted in the present chapter, reference
may be made to the fragment shown in fig. 68, A. The foliage-shoots
of this type bore verticils of linear leaves, coherent basally in the
form of a cup, at the ends of branches and not in a succession of
whorls on each branch. The association of reproductive organs, in