Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 84

Self-Compassion as a Protective Mechanism Between Sociocultural Pressures and

Disordered Eating Behaviors in Latina College Students


by

Mandrila Das, M.A.

A Dissertation

In

Counseling Psychology

Submitted to the Graduate Faculty


of Texas Tech University in
Partial Fulfillment of
the Requirements for
the Degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

Approved

C. Steven Richards, Ph.D.,


Chair of Committee

Sheila Garos, Ph.D.

Susan S. Hendrick, Ph.D.

Brandy Piña-Watson, Ph.D.

Mark Sheridan
Dean of the Graduate School

August 2020
Copyright 2020, Mandrila Das
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my gratitude to the wonderful people that have helped me

through this journey. My deepest gratitude goes to my advisor and dissertation chair, Dr.

Steven Richards. Thank you for taking a chance on me, believing in me, and providing

unwavering support throughout this difficult process. It has meant the world to me knowing

you were always in my corner. Dr. Garos, thank you for your wisdom and courage in group

psychotherapy. I will never forget that course. Dr. Hendrick, thank you for your kindness,

friendship, and ability to see the parts of me I could not find. Your encouragement helped

grow in ways I did not know were possible. Dr. Piña-Watson, thank you for giving me the

opportunity to work in your lab. Your inclusivity and thoughtfulness helped me feel a sense

of belonging throughout this journey.

I am extremely grateful to my parents. Thank you for teaching me the value of hard

work and dedication, for all the sacrifices you made so I could pursue my dreams, and for

your unconditional love. To my sister and brother in law, thank you for helping me see life

outside of school, supporting me, baking desserts, and for bringing my two favorite people

into this world.

Graduate school would not have been the same without my amazing cohort. I owe a

special thank you to the mermaids that always swam by my side. I am grateful for your

encouragement and friendship. To my best friends and support system, thank you for your

patience, for making me laugh, sending care packages, and believing in me more than I

believed in myself at times. For everyone that has been part of this process, I am forever

grateful for the overwhelming amount of love and support I have received from each of you.

ii
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................ii
Abstract.................................................................................................................... ..v
List of Tables..............................................................................................................vi
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................1

Disordered Eating…….……………...…………………....................................1

Body Image……………………….....................................................................2

Exercise Behaviors……………………………………………….……….……3

Depressive Symptoms.…………………………………………………………4

Sociocultural Pressure………………………………………………………….5

Self-Compassion……………………………………………………………….8

Purpose and Significance of the Study...............................................................9

Limitations in Past Research…………………………………………………..9

Hypotheses.........................................................................................................10

2. Method………..................................................................................................11

Participants........................................................................................................11

Procedure ……………………………………………………………………..11

Measures............................................................................................................11

3. Results………...................................................................................................16

Disordered Eating..............................................................................................17

Body Appreciation…………………………………………………………….18

Body Dissatisfaction..........................................................................................19

Exercise Behaviors………………….…...........................................................20

Depressive Symptoms………………………………………………………...21

iii
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

4. Discussion……….......................................................................................... 26

Hypothesis One.............................................................................................. 26

Hypothesis Two……………………………………………………………. 27

Hypothesis Three........................................................................................... 28

Hypothesis Four…………………….…........................................................ 29

Implications, Limitations & Future Directions………………………... ….. 29

5. References………..........................................................................................32

6. Appendices……….........................................................................................42

A. Extended Literature Review..................................................................... 42

B. Tables…………………………………………………………………….57

C. Study Information Sheet………………………………………………....60

D. Demographics…………………………....................................................61

E. Eating Attitudes Test ………………………………………………….…62

F. Body Shape Questionnaire.........................................................................65

G. Body Appreciation Scale…………………………………………….…..68

H. Compulsive Exercise Test..........................................................................69

I. Exercise Motivation Inventory...................................................................70

J. Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale...............................72

K. Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire…………....73

L. Self-Compassion Scale..............................................................................76

M. The Multidimensional Acculturative Stress Inventory….........................77

iv
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Abstract

According to the sociocultural model for eating pathology development, young women in the

United States receive messages from media, peers, and family that a thin physique is

considered beautiful (Stice, 2001). These messages on physical attractiveness and thin beauty

ideals may be especially distressing for minority women as they try to navigate differences

between their culture of origin and the majority culture (Chin, Evans, & McConnell, 2003).

In fact, acculturative stress, the negative psychological influence of adapting to a new

culture, has been well-established as a predictor for disordered eating behaviors, body

dissatisfaction, and depressive symptoms among minority women (Driscoll & Torres, 2013).

This study sought to replicate the sociocultural model for eating pathology with Latina

college students and examine self-compassion as a protective mechanism against

sociocultural pressures, including acculturative stress. Participants were 148 undergraduate

students who attended college at a large university in Texas. Multiple hierarchical linear

regression analysis was used to examine main and interaction effects of sociocultural

pressure and self-compassion on disordered eating, body image, appearance-motivated

exercise, and depressive symptoms for Latina college students. Sociocultural pressure and

dimensions of acculturative stress positively predicted disordered eating behaviors.

Specifically, language competency pressure, bicultural self-consciousness, and pressure to

acculturate positively predicted body image concerns, depressive symptoms, and unhealthy

eating and exercise behaviors. Additionally, self-compassion served as a protective

mechanism against sociocultural pressures on body image and depressive symptoms.

Findings suggest that the sociocultural model for eating pathology can be applied to Latina

college students and should include culturally relevant dimensions of social pressure.

v
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

List of Tables

1. Model 2. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Sociocultural Internalization..57

2. Model 3. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Sociocultural Pressure………57

3. Model 5. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for English Competency


Pressure……………………………………………………………………………..57

4. Model 6. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Bicultural Self-


Consciousness………………………………………………………………………58

5. Model 7. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Pressure to Acculturate…….59

vi
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Chapter One

Introduction

Disordered Eating

According to the American Psychiatric Association (2013), disordered eating

encompasses a range of problematic eating behaviors, including restricting food intake,

laxative use, binging, and self-induced vomiting. Engaging in these behaviors can often lead

to negative physiological and psychological health outcomes and is one of the most well-

established indicators for the development of a clinical eating disorder (Stice, Becker, &

Yokum, 2013; Striegel-Moore & Cachelin, 2001). Past research has highlighted the rising

prevalence of disordered eating among college women (Eisenberg, Nicklett, Roeder, & Kirz,

2011). For example, data from one college over a 13 year period (1995-2008) demonstrated

an increase in disordered eating behaviors from 23% to 32% (White, Reynolds-Malear, &

Cordero, 2011) among women in college.

Despite the misconception that clinical or sub-clinical eating disorders do not affect

minority women, recent research suggests that they are in fact equally as prevalent in

minority groups as they are in the non-Latino White population (Cachelin, Rebeck, Veisel, &

Striegel-Moore, 2001; Franko et. al, 2007). Latinas may be especially vulnerable to

developing eating pathology (Gordon, Castro, Sitnikov, & Holm-Denoma, 2010). Data

analyzed from the National Latino and Asian American Study, which included 1,427 Latina

participants, found an estimated lifetime prevalence of 0.12% for anorexia nervosa, 2.31%

for binge eating disorder, 1.91% for bulimia nervosa, 0.14% for symptoms of anorexia, and

5.80% for any binge-eating behaviors. Additionally, researchers found that eating behaviors

involving binge eating were significant concerns among Latinas, whereas symptoms of

1
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

anorexia were relatively uncommon (Alegria et al., 2007). Evidence suggests that Latinas

experience disordered eating behaviors at similar or greater rates than their peer groups,

however there is still a gap in identifying how cultural stressors influence these behaviors and

identifying risk and protective factors among this group of women.

Body Image

Body dissatisfaction is the negative evaluation of one’s body, or specific body

features such as thighs, stomach, or hips, and is frequently associated with disordered eating

behaviors and clinical eating disorders (Stice & Shaw, 2002; Shaw, Stice, & Springer, 2004).

Consistent with literature on disordered eating, body dissatisfaction affects college-aged

women (Tiggemann, 2003) and is prevalent among ethnic minority women (Grabe & Hyde,

2006). Research with ethnically diverse samples suggests that body dissatisfaction tends to

be highest among Latinas in comparison to their Black peer group (Croll, Neumark-Sztainer,

Story, & Ireland, 2002). Furthermore, one study with college women found that Latinas

demonstrate higher rates of desire to be thin and more body dissatisfaction than White

women (McComb & Clopton, 2002), however findings between these two groups of women

have shown mixed results, as other studies have suggested no differences between these

groups (Cachelin, Rebeck, Chung, & Pelayo, 2002; Shaw, Ramirez, Trost, Randall, & Stice,

2004).

Literature on body image has recently shifted to a more holistic perspective of the

relationship between women and their bodies, which includes an understanding of both

positive and negative body image (Avalos, Tylka, & Wood-Barcalow, 2005). Specifically,

the concept of body appreciation has been identified as a separate construct from low levels

of body dissatisfaction or the absence of body dissatisfaction. Body appreciation reflects an

2
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

acceptance of one’s body regardless of size or imperfections (Avalos et al., 2005), and has

been associated with lower levels of disordered eating behaviors, engaging in physical

activity for enjoyment, and protecting women from the effects of negative media exposure

regarding body image (Halliwell, 2013; Homan & Tylka, 2014).

One concern with the existing research on body image is that samples predominantly

include White women, which limits the emphasis on cultural differences among minority

samples. Women may differ in their relationship with their bodies, especially since beauty

ideals may depend on cultural and social environments (Crago & Shisslak, 2003). This

relationship may also be exacerbated for minority women since their social and cultural

environment includes incoming messages from both the majority culture and their culture of

origin.

Exercise Behaviors

Compulsive exercise is defined by a drive to exercise despite negative physical or

psychological consequences (Taranis, Touyz & Meyer, 2011) and often coexists with dietary

restriction, purging, and other unhealthy weight loss behaviors. However, the concept of

exercise can be difficult to navigate since it is often considered a healthy activity outside of

the eating disorder domain. Although exercise has typically been associated with positive

mental health outcomes, research suggests that among those who engage in disordered eating

behaviors, exercising is associated with negative mental health outcomes (De Young &

Anderson, 2010). Given that women in college exhibit higher rates of disordered eating

behaviors, it is likely that they would also engage in excessive exercise. Studies have

documented a large prevalence of compulsive exercise among college women with rates

ranging from 18.1% to 45.9%. (Guidi et al., 2007; Garman, Hayduk, Crider, & Hodel, 2004).

3
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Recent research in this domain has focused on understanding intentions behind the

physical activity. Analyzing the motivation for exercise can highlight whether an individual

is exercising to control their shape and appearance or if they are exercising for health-related

reasons. This may be particularly important as past research suggests that individuals who

engage in exercise for appearance management reasons may be more likely to develop eating

pathology than individuals who exercise for more health and fitness-oriented reasons (La

Page & Crowther, 2010).

Depressive Symptoms

Past literature has established the high prevalence rates of depressive symptoms

among college students (American College Health Association-National College Health

Assessment, 2009) and ethnic minority groups (Nishikawa, Rubinstein, & Annunziato,

2013). Specifically, studies suggest that Latinas report comparable rates of major depression

and higher rates of depressive symptoms compared with non-Latina Whites (Menselson,

Rehkopf, & Kubzansky, 2008). Additionally, depressive symptoms and disordered eating

behaviors have consistently exhibited a high comorbidity rate (Francis et al., 2015).

In a study by Gutzwiller and colleagues (2003), participants were divided into three

groups: one with clinical eating disorders, the second with some symptoms of eating

disorders, and a third group with no eating concerns. Researchers found a direct relationship

between the level of dysfunctional eating behavior and depression. Results indicated that

participants with an eating disorder displayed clinical levels of depression, participants with

disordered eating displayed mild levels of depression, and participants with no eating

disorder or maladaptive eating behaviors displayed the lowest levels of depression.

Furthermore, in a recent meta-analysis with 30 studies, researchers demonstrated the bi-

4
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

directional relationship between eating pathology and depression, where eating pathology

significantly predicted depression and depression significantly predicted eating pathology

(Francis et al., 2015). Similarly, as one might expect, depressive symptoms have also been

positively associated with body dissatisfaction in studies with undergraduate college women

(Gitimu et al., 2015).

Sociocultural Model

Sociocultural pressure has been established as the strongest influence on eating

pathology and body disturbance in Western societies (Culbert, Racine, & Klump, 2015; Keel,

2015). Sociocultural researchers suggest that culture-specific ideals, expectations, and

messages contribute to the development and maintenance of disordered eating and body

image concerns. Several studies over the past few decades highlight how mainstream

American culture promotes eating pathology by emphasizing physical appearance as one of

the most important aspects for a woman and valuing an extremely slender physique above all

else (Keel, 2015; LaMarre, & Rice, 2016). In mainstream American culture, the ideal

appearance for women is thin, with a small waist, light eyes, a large bust, White skin color,

and long legs (Carter & Ortiz, 2008), and women often feel pressure from their social

environment to attain these beauty ideals. However, because these ideals may not be

achievable, young women may experience dissatisfaction with their bodies and engage in

unhealthy weight control behaviors (Shroff & Thompson, 2006). The existing literature has

examined different dimensions of the sociocultural model, including using media as a source

of information about beauty, pressure to adopt these ideals, and internalization of these

messages (Thompson et. al., 2004), and how each one relates to disordered eating and body

image. The pressure to attain certain beauty ideals, and “buying in” to these messages have

5
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

been shown to predict higher levels of eating pathology and body dissatisfaction, while only

consuming information from media predicts lower levels (Low et. al., 2003). Researchers

suggest that these dimensions may serve as building blocks, with consumption of information

being the first step, progressing to pressure to adhere to the messages, and then finally

internalizing these messages as one’s own belief system (Warren, Gleaves, & Rakhkovskaya,

2013).

To date, there is still very little known about eating pathology among Latinas, and

specifically on the role of sociocultural factors. Compared to mainstream American culture,

traditional Latina beauty standards embrace larger figures and do not adhere to the slender

physique as the ideal for attractiveness (Cachelin et al., 2000; Austin & Smith, 2008). This

may cause distress for Latina women as they attempt to negotiate their own beliefs on beauty

ideals both within their culture and the majority culture. Additionally, minority women may

be at particular risk because the ideal appearance for American women may be unattainable

for many ethnic women given specific genetic variations (Stein, Corte, & Ronis, 2010). The

handful of studies on sociocultural pressure reveal that among Latina college students,

internalization of this mainstream beauty ideal is positively associated to eating disorder

symptomology and body dissatisfaction (Warren et al., 2005).

Sociocultural models have primarily focused on messages that promote mainstream

American culture, specifically from family, peers, and the media. However, among minority

women, the pressure to conform to specific norms or behaviors may be an additional stressor.

Acculturative stress reflects the adverse psychological impact of balancing one’s own culture

and the majority culture (Berry, 1998). Latinas may have their own cultural values and

ideals, which can conflict with the beauty ideals represented in typical Western mainstream

6
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

culture. This may cause an internal struggle for minority women as they balance these two

opposing perspectives. Acculturative stress has consistently been associated with poor mental

health outcomes among minority groups. Past studies have found that acculturative stress is

positively associated with depressive symptoms among Latinas, and particularly among

minority college students in the United States (Baker, Soto, Perez, & Lee, 2012; Cervantes,

Cardoso, & Goldbach, 2015; Cano et al., 2015; Castillo et al., 2015; Mejía & McCarthy,

2010). The existing literature has examined different dimensions of acculturative stress,

including language competency pressure, pressure to acculturate, and bicultural self-

consciousness (Rodriguez et. al., 2002), and how they relate to psychological outcomes.

Language competency pressure has consistently been related to negative psychological

outcomes, including higher levels of depressive symptoms (Rodriguez et. al., 2002).

Evidence also supports a positive relationship between acculturative stress and

disordered eating behaviors. For example, a study by Gordon, Castro, Sitnikov, and Holm-

Denoma (2010), found that higher levels of acculturative stress are associated with increased

eating disorder symptoms, including body image dissatisfaction in Latina college women.

Similarly, another study by Perez, Voelz, Pettit, and Joiner (2002) found that acculturative

stress predicts bulimic symptoms in Latinx college students. This relationship has been well

established in the literature, however there is limited research examining how varying

dimensions of acculturative stress impact mental health, particularly surrounding eating

pathology and body image. Additionally, there is minimal research that focuses on

identifying protective mechanisms to buffer against the negative effects of acculturative

stress.

7
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

The Role of Self-Compassion

Self-compassion is defined as the ability to treat oneself with kindness and

understanding rather than judgment, recognize connection to humanity rather than isolation,

and bring negative thoughts and emotions into awareness rather than over-identifying with

them (Neff, 2003). It reflects concern and compassion toward others, but it also reflects being

able to express this same concern and compassion toward oneself (Neely, Schallert,

Mohammed, Roberts, & Chen, 2009). One key aspect of self-compassion is a healthy self-

acceptance, and kindness towards one’s inadequacies (Neely et al., 2009). Recent research

has demonstrated a positive relationship between self-compassion and psychological health

(Neff, 2009).

The literature highlights self-compassion as a protective factor for eating pathology,

body image concerns, and depressive symptomology. In one study with college students,

researchers found that higher self-compassion predicted lower eating disorder symptomology

(Taylor, Krietsch, & Daiss, 2015). Additionally, past literature on self-compassion and body

dissatisfaction has yielded consistent findings: higher levels of self-compassion have been

associated with greater body acceptance in college student samples (Wasylkiw et al., 2012),

whereas lower self-compassion has been associated with body dissatisfaction (Ferreira,

Pinto-Gouveia, & Duarte, 2013). Similarly, in another study with 126 university students,

researchers found that women who were highly compassionate towards themselves regarding

their appearance were less concerned about being thin and were more satisfied with their

body and appearance (Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Dodos, Chatzisarantis, & Ntoumanis, 2017).

These findings indicate that self-compassion may predict lower levels of disordered eating

since it promotes a healthier relationship with one’s body and appearance.

8
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Yet only one study has investigated how self-compassion protects against the

negative effects of sociocultural pressure. In a study by Tylka and colleagues (2015),

researchers found that self-compassion mitigates the effects of sociocultural on disordered

eating behaviors. However, this study has never been replicated with college students or

ethnically diverse samples. It is possible that women with higher levels of self-compassion

can combat these unrealistic beauty ideals, which could minimize body dissatisfaction and

disordered eating behavior. Thus, pressure to be thin or have a specific body shape may be

countered by a compassionate stance towards oneself and an appreciation of one’s body,

regardless of size or cultural norms. Furthermore, there are virtually no studies examining the

role of self-compassion specifically among Latinas, which may be particularly beneficial for

a group vulnerable to acculturative stress, sociocultural pressure, body dissatisfaction, and

eating pathology.

The Present Study

Past literature has established the positive association between sociocultural pressure

and eating pathology, body image concerns, and depressive symptoms with samples of White

women. Additionally, the literature has established the positive relationship between

acculturative stress and eating pathology, body image concerns, and depressive symptoms

among Latinas. This study sought to bridge these two areas of research and utilize a

culturally informed model including multiple dimensions of sociocultural pressure. This

study had three primary aims.

The first aim of this study was to apply the existing sociocultural model of eating

pathology to Latina college students. With regard to sociocultural theory for eating

9
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

pathology, dimensions included thin ideal internalization, information from external sources,

and pressure to attain a beauty ideal.

The second aim was to expand on this model and include culturally significant

sociocultural pressures. With regard to cultural stressors, acculturative stress was measured

using the following dimensions: Spanish competency pressure, English competency pressure,

bicultural self-consciousness, and pressure to acculturate.

The third aim was to examine self-compassion as a potential protective mechanism.

There is only one study examining self-compassion as a protective mechanism against

sociocultural pressure on disordered eating, however, this study was done with community

women and a predominantly White sample.

H1. Sociocultural internalization, information, and pressure will positively predict disordered

eating, body dissatisfaction, depressive symptoms, compulsive exercise, and exercising for

appearance motivated reasons and negatively predict body appreciation.

H2. Spanish competency, English competency, bicultural self-consciousness, and pressure to

acculturate will positively predict disordered eating, body dissatisfaction, depressive

symptoms, compulsive exercise, and exercising for appearance motivated reasons and

negatively predict body appreciation.

H3: Self-compassion will moderate the relationship between sociocultural pressures and

disordered eating, body image, exercise, and depressive symptoms.

H4: Self-compassion will negatively predict disordered eating, depressive symptoms,

body dissatisfaction, compulsive exercise, and appearance motivated exercise and positively

predict body appreciation.

10
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Chapter Two

Method

Participants

Participants were 148 undergraduate students who attended college at a large

university in Texas. Participant’s ages ranged from 18-25 (M = 19, SD = 1.2) and majority of

the sample were freshmen in college (72%).

Procedure

This study received approval by the Institutional Review Board at Texas Tech

University, where data was collected. Participants elected to participate in this study from a

list of available studies on the online university research portal or through a university-wide

email announcement. The survey was administered in an online format and took

approximately 60 minutes to complete. After reviewing brief information regarding the

study, participants continued to fill out the demographics questionnaire. Subsequently,

participants were given the measures in random order to minimize order effects. Participants

received course credit for their participation if they completed the study through the

university research portal and were enrolled in a General Psychology course or were entered

in a drawing for a $35 Amazon gift card if they participated through the university-wide

email announcement. All information was anonymous. Participation was voluntary and could

be discontinued at any time throughout the process.

Measures

Demographics. Demographic items included questions regarding age, gender, and

ethnic/racial identity.

11
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Disordered eating. The Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26; Garner, Olmsted, Bohr, &

Garfinkel, 1982) is a 26-item measure assessing eating disorder symptomology. This

measure includes three subscales (oral control, dieting, and bulimia and food preoccupation).

The response format ranges from 1 (never) to 6 (always), with higher scores indicated higher

levels of disordered eating symptomology. Sample items include “avoid eating when hungry”

and “eat diet foods.” A total disordered eating score was computed, with higher scores

indicating greater levels of disordered eating behaviors. This scale has been normed with

Latina college students and demonstrates high internal consistency and validity, α = .92

(Reyes‐Rodríguez et al., 2010). Cronbach’s alpha for this study was .91.

Body dissatisfaction. The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ; Cooper, Taylor, Cooper,

& Fairbum, 1987) is a 34-item questionnaire that measures concerns about body shape.

Responses range from 1 (never) to 6 (always), with higher scores indicating more concerns

with one’s body. A sample item is “Have you felt so bad about your shape that you have

cried.” A total body dissatisfaction score was computed, with higher scores indicating greater

levels of body dissatisfaction. The BSQ has been normed with college students and Latina

women, and has high internal consistency; α = .97 (Cooper et al., 1987) and concurrent

validity (Warren et al., 2008). Cronbach’s alpha for this study was .96.

Body appreciation. The Body Appreciation Scale (BAS; Avalos et al., 2005) is a 13-

item questionnaire that measures appreciation for one’s body. Responses range from 1

(never) to 5 (always), with higher scores reflecting higher levels of body appreciation. A

sample item is “Despite my flaws, I accept my body for what it is.” A total body appreciation

score was computed, with higher scores indicating greater levels of body appreciation. The

BAS has demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .91-.94; Avalos et al., 2005) and

12
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

convergent validity (Webb, Wood-Barcalow, Tylka, 2015). Cronbach’s alpha for this study

was .93.

Compulsive exercise. The Compulsive Exercise Test (CET; Taranis, Touyz, &

Meyer, 2011) is a 24-item measure used to assess compulsive exercise. The CET includes 5

subscales (avoidance and rule-driven behavior, weight control exercise, mood improvement,

lack of exercise enjoyment, and exercise rigidity). The response format ranges from 0 (never

true) to 5 (always true), with higher scores indicating problematic exercise behaviors. Sample

items include “I feel extremely guilty if I miss an exercise session” and “I exercise to

improve my appearance.” are to them. A total compulsive exercise score was computed, with

higher scores indicating greater levels of compulsive exercise. Reliability was strong for the

CET (Cronbach’s α = 0.84), and reliability coefficients reported in previous studies range

with college students range from .71 to .88 (Taranis, Touyz, & Meyer, 2011; Dalle, Calugi,

& Machesini, 2008; Dalle, 2009). Cronbach’s alpha for this study was .76.

Motivation for exercise. The Exercise Motivations Inventory - 2 (EMI-2; Markland

& Hardy, 1993) is used to assess reasons for exercise. Response options range from 0 (not at

all true for me) to 5 (very true for me). Four items were used from this scale to assess

appearance related motivation for exercise; “to be slim,” “to lose weight,” “to improve

appearance,” and “to improve overall body shape.” A total score of this subscale was

computed, with higher scores indicating greater levels of appearance-motivated exercise.

Reliability was strong for the EMI-2 with alpha coefficients ranging from .68-.95 (Markland

& Ingledew, 1997). Cronbach’s alpha for this study was .91.

Depressive symptomology. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale

(CES-D; Santor & Coyne, 1997) is a 20-item measure used to assess depressive

13
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

symptomology. Response options range from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all

of the time). Sample items include “I felt depressed” and “I thought my life had been a

failure.” A total depressive symptoms score was computed, with higher scores indicating

greater levels of depressive symptoms. This scale demonstrates good internal consistency,

ranging from .84-.90 (Santor & Coyne, 1997) and validity in studies with Hispanic college

students (Naragon-Gainey, Watson, & Markon, 2009; Torres & Rollock, 2007). Cronbach’s

alpha for this study was .90.

Sociocultural Attitudes. The Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance

Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3; Thompson, van den Berg, Roehrig, Guarda, & Heinberg, 2004)

is a 30-item questionnaire used to assess sociocultural attitudes towards appearance. Three

subscales from this measure were used: Information, Pressure, General Internalization.

Response options range from 1 (definitely disagree) to 5 (definitely agree), with higher

scores suggesting greater internalization of ideal body types. A sample item is, “I've felt

pressure from TV and magazines to be thin.” Reliability for this scale is excellent; α = .94

(Thompson et al., 2004). Total scores on each subscale were computed with higher scores

indicating greater levels of endorsement. Past research has demonstrated adequate reliability

and convergent validity with Latina college-aged women, with alpha levels ranging between

.81 and .86 (Warren et al., 2005). Cronbach’s alphas for this study were .91 for the

internalization subscale, .93 for the pressures subscale, and .77 for the information subscale.

Acculturative Stress. The Multidimensional Acculturative Stress Inventory (MASI;

Rodriguez et al., 2002; Rodriguez et al., 2015) is a 36-item instrument that assesses an

individual’s level of acculturative stress related to competency of language use, pressures to

acculturate to the mainstream culture, and pressures against acculturation to the mainstream

14
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

culture. Respondents range from 0 (does not apply) to 5 (extremely stressful), with higher

scores indicating greater acculturative stress. A sample item is “It bothers me when people

pressure me to assimilate to the American ways of doing things.” This scale has

demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .92) and validity among college students

(Rodriguez et al., 2002). Three subscales were used from MASI, 2015 including Spanish

competency pressure, English competency pressure, and Bicultural self-consciousness. One

subscale was used from MASI, 2002 including Pressure to acculturate. Total scores for each

subscale were used with higher scores indicating greater levels of endorsement. Cronbach’s

alphas for this study were .78 for the pressure to acculturate subscale, .78 for the bicultural

self-consciousness subscale, .91 for the English competency subscale, and .92 for the Spanish

competency subscale.

Self-Compassion. The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Neff, 2003) is a 26-item scale

used to assess self-compassion. The SCS has six subscales that measure the three dimensions

of self-compassion and their opposite dimensions (Self-kindness, Common Humanity, and

Mindfulness, Self-judgment, Isolation, and Over-identification). Response options range

from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). A total self-compassion score is computed, with

higher scores indicating greater levels of self-compassion. A sample item is “I try to be

loving toward myself when I’m feeling emotional pain.” Reliability for this scale is excellent;

α = .93 (Neff, 2003). This measure has high internal consistency and validity with college

students, α = .95 (Mehr & Adams, 2016). Cronbach’s alpha for this study was .92.

15
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Chapter Three

Results

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., 2012). The

variables met statistical assumptions of normality and linearity. Nineteen cases were deleted

due to missing data using listwise deletion (Pigott, 2001). Additionally, seven participants

were deleted since they did not meet the age requirement of 18-25 years old. Therefore, of

the original 174 cases, 148 participants were included in the analyses.

Multiple hierarchical linear regression analysis was used to examine main and

interaction effects of sociocultural pressure and self-compassion on disordered eating, body

image, appearance-motivated exercise, and depressive symptoms for Latina college students.

For each model, one of the seven dimensions of sociocultural pressure was entered in step 1,

self-compassion was entered in step 2, and the sociocultural pressure and self-compassion

interaction was entered in step 3. Only significant results from step 3 of each model will be

reported. Tables for significant moderations are included in Appendix B. Model 1:

Sociocultural information was the predictor variable. Model 2: Sociocultural internalization

was the predictor variable. Refer to Table 1. Model 3: Sociocultural pressure was the

predictor variable. Refer to Table 2.

Model 4: Spanish competency pressure was the predictor variable. Model 5: English

competency pressure was the predictor variable. Refer to Table 3. Model 6: Bicultural self-

consciousness was the predictor variable. Refer to Table 4. Model 7: Pressure to acculturate

was the predictor variable. Refer to Table 5. Additionally, simple slopes analyses were also

conducted on these interactions to examine the significance slope of each predictor variable

(Frazier et al., 2004).

16
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Disordered eating. Model 1: Sociocultural information and self-compassion

explained 12% of the variance (R2 = .12, p < .001). Sociocultural information was a

significant positive predictor (β = .293, p < .01, CI[.19, .73]) and self-compassion was a

significant negative predictor β = -.200, p < .05, CI[-5.77, -4.33]). Model 2: Sociocultural

internalization and self-compassion explained 11% of the variance (R2 = .11, p < .001).

Sociocultural internalization was a significant positive predictor (β = .246 p < .01, CI[.11,

.68]). Model 3: Sociocultural pressure and self-compassion explained 16% of the variance

(R2 = .16, p < .001). Sociocultural pressure was a significant positive predictor (β = .318 p <

.001, CI[.24, .80]) and the interaction was a significant negative predictor (β = -.163 p < .05,

CI[-.62, -.00]). For simple slopes analyses, the line for self-compassion (p = .242) was not

significant.

Model 4: Spanish competency pressure and self-compassion explained 7% of the

variance (R2 = .07, p < .01). Model 5: English competency pressure and self-compassion

explained 11% of the variance (R2 = .11, p < .001). English competency pressure was a

significant positive predictor (β = .264, p < .01, CI[.17, .82]) and self-compassion was a

significant negative predictor (β = -.300, p < .01, CI[-7.53, -2.11]). Model 6: Bicultural self-

consciousness and self-compassion explained 13% of the variance (R2 = .13, p < .001).

Bicultural self-consciousness was a significant positive predictor (β = .294, p < .01, CI[.78,

2.81]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.320, p < .001, CI[-

7.51, -2.25]). Model 7: Pressure to acculturate and self-compassion explained 16% of the

variance (R2 = .16, p < .001). Pressure to acculturate was a significant positive predictor (β =

.329, p < .001, CI[.57, 1.68]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -

.273, p < .01, CI[-6.73, -1.68]).

17
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

In all models, self-compassion accounted for a significant proportion of the variance

in disordered eating. Model 3 revealed a significant interaction between sociocultural

pressure and self-compassion on disordered eating behaviors.

Body Appreciation. Model 1: Sociocultural information and self-compassion

explained 34% of the variance (R2 = .34, p < .001). Self-compassion was a significant

positive predictor (β = .593, p < .001, CI[5.67, 9.43]). Model 2: Sociocultural internalization

and self-compassion explained 36% of the variance (R2 = .36, p < .001). Self-compassion

was a significant positive predictor (β = .549, p < .001, CI[5.02, 8.58]). Model 3:

Sociocultural pressure and self-compassion explained 37% of the variance (R2 = .37, p <

.001). Sociocultural pressure was a significant negative predictor (β = -.226, p < .01, CI[-.51,

-.10]) and self-compassion was a significant positive predictor (β = .504, p < .001, CI[4.51,

8.29]).

Model 4: Spanish competency pressure and self-compassion explained 33% of the

variance (R2 = .33, p < .001). Self-compassion was a significant positive predictor (β = .471,

p < .01, CI[2.51, 9.89]). Model 5: English competency pressure and self-compassion

explained 37% of the variance (R2 = .37, p < .001). Self-compassion was a significant

positive predictor (β = .598, p < .001, CI[6.01, 9.74]) and the interaction was a significant

negative predictor (β = -.204, p < .05, CI[-.54, -.09]). Model 6: Bicultural self-consciousness

and self-compassion explained 37% of the variance (R2 = .37, p < .001). Self-compassion

was a significant positive predictor (β = .649, p < .001, CI[6.37, 10.06]). Model 7: Pressure

to acculturate and self-compassion explained 36% of the variance (R2 = .36, p < .001).

Pressure to acculturate was a significant negative predictor (β = -.146, p < .05, CI[-.80, -.01])

and self-compassion was a significant positive predictor (β = .605, p < .001, CI[5.93, 9.54]).

18
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

In all models, self-compassion accounted for a significant proportion of the variance

in body appreciation. Model 5 revealed a significant interaction between English competency

pressure and self-compassion on body appreciation.

Body Dissatisfaction. Model 1: Sociocultural information and self-compassion

explained 28% of the variance (R2 = .28, p < .001). Sociocultural information was a

significant positive predictor (β = .347, p < .001, CI[.88, 2.28]) and self-compassion was a

significant negative predictor (β = -.385, p < .001, CI[-24.64, -10.41]). Model 2:

Sociocultural internalization and self-compassion explained 28% of the variance (R2 = .28, p

< .001). Sociocultural internalization was a significant positive predictor (β = .361, p < .001,

CI[.97, 2.50]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.320, p < .001,

CI[-21.60, -7.28]). Model 3: Sociocultural pressure and self-compassion explained 32% of

the variance (R2 = .32, p < .001). Sociocultural pressure was a significant positive predictor

(β = .421, p < .001, CI[1.29, 2.74]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor

(β = -.306, p < .001, CI[-21.01, -6.95]).

Model 4: Spanish competency pressure and self-compassion explained 24% of the

variance (R2 = .24, p < .001). Spanish competency pressure was a significant positive

predictor (β = .183, p < .05, CI[.09, 1.17]) and self-compassion was a significant negative

predictor (β = -.365, p < .05, CI[-31.79, -3.09]). Model 5: English competency pressure and

self-compassion explained 33% of the variance (R2 = .33, p < .001). English competency

pressure was a significant positive predictor (β = .311, p < .001, CI[.89, 2.55]) and self-

compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.545, p < .001, CI[-33.12, -19.03]) and

the interaction was a significant positive predictor (β = .154, p < .05, CI[.021, 1.68]). Model

6: Bicultural self-consciousness and self-compassion explained 30% of the variance (R2 =

19
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

.30, p < .001). Bicultural self-consciousness was a significant positive predictor (β = .323, p

< .001, CI[3.04, 8.32]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.533, p

< .001, CI[-31.09, -16.99]). Model 7: Pressure to acculturate and self-compassion explained

31% of the variance (R2 = .31, p < .001). Pressure to acculturate was a significant positive

predictor (β = .373, p < .001, CI[2.23, 5.15]) and self-compassion was a significant negative

predictor (β = -.463, p < .001, CI[-27.92, -14.32]).

In all models, self-compassion accounted for a significant proportion of the variance

in body dissatisfaction. Model 5 revealed a significant interaction between English

competency pressure and self-compassion on body dissatisfaction.

Appearance-motivated exercise. Model 1: Sociocultural information and self-

compassion explained 18% of the variance (R2 = .18, p < .001). Sociocultural information

was a significant positive predictor (β = .332, p < .001, CI[.09, .27]) and self-compassion was

a significant negative predictor (β = -.263, p < .01, CI[-2.33, -.55]). Model 2: Sociocultural

internalization and self-compassion explained 16% of the variance (R2 = .16, p < .001).

Sociocultural internalization was a significant positive predictor (β = .316, p < .001, CI[.08,

.27]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.189, p < .05, CI[-1.93, -

.09]). Model 3: Sociocultural pressure and self-compassion explained 16% of the variance

(R2 = .16, p < .001). Sociocultural pressure was a significant positive predictor (β = .307, p <

.001, CI[.08, .27]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.212, p <

.05, CI[-2.08, -.23]).

Model 4: Spanish competency pressure and self-compassion explained 6% of the

variance (R2 = .06, p < .05). Model 5: English competency pressure and self-compassion

explained 7% of the variance (R2 = .07, p < .01). Self-compassion was a significant negative

20
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

predictor (β = -.301, p < .01, CI[-2.65, -.74]). Model 6: Bicultural self-consciousness and

self-compassion explained 9% of the variance (R2 = .09, p < .01). Self-compassion was a

significant negative predictor (β = -.313, p < .001, CI[-2.61, -.76]). Model 7: Pressure to

acculturate and self-compassion explained 9% of the variance (R2 = .09, p < .01). Self-

compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.309, p < .001, CI[-2.58, -.77]).

Compulsive exercise. Model 1: Sociocultural information was a significant positive

predictor (β = .245, p < .01, CI[.14, .88]). Model 2: Sociocultural internalization was a

significant positive predictor (β = .220, p < .05, CI[.07, .87]). Model 3: Sociocultural

pressure was a significant positive predictor (β = .222, p < .05, CI[.08, .87]). Model 6:

Bicultural self-consciousness was a significant positive predictor (β = .180, p < .05, CI[-.01,

2.94]).

Depressive Symptoms. Model 1: Sociocultural information and self-compassion

explained 14% of the variance (R2 = .14, p < .001). Self-compassion was a significant

negative predictor (β = -.370, p < .001, CI[-5.75, -2.10]). The interaction between

sociocultural information and self-compassion was positive and significant (β = .189, p < .05,

CI[.02, .48]). Model 2: Sociocultural internalization and self-compassion explained 15% of

the variance (R2 = .15, p < .001). Self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -

.335, p < .001, CI[-5.30, -1.65]). The interaction between sociocultural internalization and

self-compassion was positive and significant (β = .189, p < .05, CI[.02, .48]). For simple

slopes analyses, the line for self-compassion (p = .236) was not significant.

21
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Model 3: Sociocultural pressure and self-compassion explained 15% of the variance

(R2 = .15, p < .001). Self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.332, p <

.001, CI[-5.32, -1.64]).

Model 4: Spanish competency pressure and self-compassion explained 28% of the

variance (R2 = .28, p < .001). Spanish competency pressure was a significant positive

predictor (β = .324, p < .001, CI[.13, .38]) and self-compassion was a significant negative

predictor (β = -.523, p < .01, CI[-8.87, -2.40]). Model 5: English competency pressure and

self-compassion explained 26% of the variance (R2 = .26, p < .001). English competency

pressure was a significant positive predictor (β = .162, p < .05, CI[.00, .42]) and self-

compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.499, p < .001, CI[-7.07, -3.70]). The

interaction was a significant positive predictor (β = .208, p < .05, CI[.06, .46]). Model 6:

Bicultural self-consciousness and self-compassion explained 24% of the variance (R2 = .24, p

< .001). Bicultural self-consciousness was a significant positive predictor (β = .219, p < .01,

CI[.25, 1.58]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -.473, p < .001,

CI[-6.57, -3.22]). The interaction was a significant positive predictor (β = .268, p < .01,

CI[.391, 1.60]). Model 7: Pressure to acculturate and self-compassion explained 18% of the

variance (R2 = .18, p < .001). Pressure to acculturate was a significant positive predictor (β =

.190, p < .05, CI[.06, .82]) and self-compassion was a significant negative predictor (β = -

.392, p < .001, CI[-5.78, -2.39]).The interaction was a significant positive predictor (β = -

.217, p < .01, CI[.14, .96]).

In all models, self-compassion accounted for a significant proportion of the variance

in depressive symptoms. Model 2, 5, 6, and 7 revealed a significant interaction between

22
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

sociocultural internalization, English competency pressure, bicultural self-consciousness, and

pressure to acculturate and self-compassion on depressive symptoms.

Table 1
Model 2. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Sociocultural Internalization

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Depressive Symptoms
Step 1 .04 .04
Sociocultural Internalization .25 .05 .44 .09 .22
Step 2 .23 .09
Sociocultural Internalization .11 -.084 .31 .10 .10
Self-Compassion -3.41 -5.26 -1.56 .93 -.32
Step 3
Sociocultural Internalization .11 -.07 .316 .10 .10 .15 .03
Self-Compassion 16.66 -5.30 -1.65 .92 -.33
Interaction .250 .02 .45 .10 .18

Table 2
Model 3. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Sociocultural Pressure

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Disordered Eating
Step 1 .11 .12
Sociocultural Pressure .58 .31 .85 .11 -.38
Step 2 .14 .03
Sociocultural Pressure .49 .21 .77 .10 -.21
Self-Compassion -2.81 -5.46 -.17 .94 .51
Step 3 .16 .02
Sociocultural Pressure .52 -.51 -.10 2.22 -.22
Self-Compassion -2.49 4.51 8.29 .102 .50
Interaction .21 .000 .43 .92 .16

Table 3
Model 5. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for English Competency Pressure

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Depressive Symptoms
Step 1 .01 .01
English Competency Pressure .18 -.05 .41 .117 .13
Step 2 .22 .22

23
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

English Competency Pressure .28 .07 .48 .10 .21


Self-Compassion -5.15 -6.86 -3.44 .86 -.47
Step 3
English Competency Pressure .21 .00 .42 .10 .16 .26 .04
Self-Compassion -5.38 -7.07 -3.70 .850 -.49
Interaction .26 .061 .46 .103 .20
Body Dissatisfaction
Step 1 .05 .06
English Competency Pressure 1.40 .45 2.35 .47 .25
Step 2 .32 .26
English Competency Pressure 1.91 1.09 2.73 .413 .34
Self-Compassion -25.06 -32.13 -18.00 3.56 -.52
Step 3 .33 02
English Competency Pressure 1.72 .89 2.55 .41 .31
Self-Compassion -26.07 -33.12 -19.03 3.55 -.54
Interaction .855 .02 1.68 .42 .15
Body Appreciation
Step 1 .01 .02
English Competency Pressure .24 -.03 .52 .14 .15
Step 2 .33 .32
English Competency Pressure .10 -.13 .33 .11 .06
Self-Compassion 7.61 5.70 9.51 .96 .57
Step 3 .37 .03
English Competency Pressure .19 -.04 .42 .11 .12
Self-Compassion 7.87 6.01 9.74 .94 .58
Interaction -.31 -.54 -.09 .11 -.20

Table 4
Model 6. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Bicultural Self-Consciousness

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Depressive Symptoms
Step 1 .03 .04
Bicultural Self-Consciousness .842 .106 1.57 .372 .20
Step 2 .18 .16
Bicultural Self-Consciousness 1.097 .414 1.78 .345 .26
Self-Compassion -4.181 -5.859 -2.50 .848 -.40
Step 3 . .24 .06
Bicultural Self-Consciousness .920 .254 1.58 .337 .21
Self-Compassion -4.897 -6.571 -3.22 .845 -.47
Interaction .996 .391 1.60 .306 .26

Table 5

24
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Model 7. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Pressure to Acculturate

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Depressive Symptoms
Step 1 .02 .02
Pressure to Acculturate .39 -.01 .81 .21 .16
Step 2 .14 .13
Pressure to Acculturate .43 .04 .82 .19 .18
Self-Compassion -3.79 -5.51 -2.08 .86 -.36
Step 3 . 18 .04
Pressure to Acculturate .44 .06 .82 .19 .19 .
Self-Compassion -4.08 -5.78 -2.39 .85 -.39 .
Interaction .55 .14 .96 .20 .21

25
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Chapter Four

Discussion

H1 was partially supported. Sociocultural information positively predicted

disordered eating, body dissatisfaction, appearance motivated exercise and compulsive

exercise. Results suggest that women who consumed media as a significant source of

information about appearance-related issues had higher levels of pathology surrounding

eating, body image, and exercise. As women attend to Western media, they are exposed to

information surrounding cultural ideals of appearance. Previous literature suggests that the

endorsement of media as an important source of information can lead to pressure to follow

and internalize this incoming information (Warren et. al., 2013). For minority women, there

is likely a discrepancy in the information promoted in mainstream Western media and

messages from their culture of origin (Warren et al., 2005). Attempting to navigate these

distinct and often contrasting sets of beauty ideals and expectations may become an

additional stressor in the acculturation process. As this awareness of beauty ideals increases,

women often report increased pressure to attain the ideal (Warren et. al., 2013). In this study,

sociocultural pressure positively predicted disordered eating, body dissatisfaction,

appearance motivated exercise and compulsive exercise and negatively predicted body

appreciation. Past literature suggests that the pressure to attain a certain beauty ideal was the

most significant factor in determining body dissatisfaction (Bedford & Johnson, 2006).

Results from this study revealed a negative relationship between sociocultural pressure and

body appreciation. Given there was no relationship between body appreciation and

sociocultural information or internalization, and past research has established a relationship

between pressure and body dissatisfaction, it may be plausible that pressure to attain this

26
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

ideal leads to reduced body appreciation as well. Furthermore, sociocultural internalization

positively predicted disordered eating, body dissatisfaction, appearance motivated exercise,

and compulsive exercise. Internalization refers to the extent that women adopt these ideals

and engage in behaviors to attain them. These findings are consistent with past literature,

which has found media internalization to directly predict disordered eating behaviors. Past

literature also suggests that internalization of media and experiencing pressure to adhere may

be more resistant to treatment (Stice & Hoffman, 2004) while other studies indicate that it

may be more feasible to intervene during the internalization process (Dittmar & Howard,

2004).

H2 was partially supported. English competency pressure was a significant positive

predictor of disordered eating, body dissatisfaction, and depressive symptoms and Spanish

competency pressure was a significant positive predictor of body dissatisfaction and

depressive symptoms. Past literature suggests language competency pressure is one of the

best predictors of psychological distress, more so than other dimensions of acculturative

stress (Rodriguez et. al., 2002). Consistent with that literature, results from this study

revealed that language competency pressure was predictive of body dissatisfaction and

depressive symptomology. However, results from this study also revealed that other

dimensions of acculturative stress may be more relevant for disordered eating behaviors.

Bicultural self-consciousness was a significant positive predictor of body dissatisfaction,

disordered eating, compulsive exercise, and depressive symptoms. Women who endorsed

feeling self-conscious about their Latina and American background endorsed higher levels of

psychological concerns surrounding eating and body image. This is consistent with past

literature suggesting that college-aged women are particularly self-conscious about their

27
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

appearance and engage in higher levels of disordered eating behaviors (Warren et. al., 2013).

This may be particularly relevant for Latina students since they may be struggling to find a

sense of “fit” between the majority culture and their culture of origin. Pressure to acculturate

was a significant positive predictor of disordered eating, body dissatisfaction, and depressive

symptoms, and negative predictor of body appreciation. Pressure to acculturate refers to the

stress one experiences while trying to balance their values between Latina and American

ideals and customs. Both sociocultural pressure and pressure to acculturate predicted the

highest number of negative psychological outcomes and were the only two significant

negative predictors of body appreciation. This suggests that the pressure to adopt or navigate

certain beliefs may be especially relevant to eating pathology and body image, more so than

simply an awareness of these messages.

H3 was partially supported. Self-compassion moderated the relationship between

sociocultural pressure and disordered eating. Given that pressure to attain the thin ideal is

significantly related to maladaptive eating behaviors (McKinley & Hyde, 1996), self-

compassion may serve as a protective factor and buffer against this negative self-evaluation

and associated pressure to be thin, thus reducing endorsement of disordered eating behaviors.

Self-compassion may counteract the pressure that women feel with these messages from

Western media. This finding is consistent with previous research highlighting the negative

relationship between self-compassion and disordered eating behaviors (Breines et.al., 2014).

Additionally, self-compassion moderated the relationship between English competency

pressure and body appreciation and dissatisfaction. Finally, self-compassion moderated the

relationship between four dimensions of sociocultural pressure and depressive symptoms.

Specifically, sociocultural internalization, English competency pressure, bicultural self-

28
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

consciousness, and pressure to acculturate. Results suggest that self-compassion may serve as

a protective mechanism against acculturative stress on depressive symptomology. Results are

consistent with previous literature, which has established self-compassion as a protective

factor for depression (Terry, Leary, & Mehta, 2013). Individuals with higher self-compassion

may engage in less negative self-talk or be less critical for perceived failures. This kindness

towards oneself may protect against depressive symptomology, such as feelings of

worthlessness or hopelessness.

H4 was partially supported. Self-compassion negatively predicted disordered

eating, body dissatisfaction, appearance-motivated exercise, and depressive symptoms, and

positively predicted body appreciation. Results suggest a negative relationship between an

individual’s level of self-compassion and engagement in disordered eating behaviors. This

relationship has been well documented in the literature, however it is worth noting that these

outcomes also hold true for Latina college students. To date, research with self-compassion

and eating pathology has been conducted with predominantly White women. These findings

highlight the importance of self-compassion and the positive impact it may have on reducing

eating pathology and body related concerns among Latina college students.

Implications, Limitations, and Future Research

The present study provides support that the sociocultural model for eating pathology

may also be applicable for Latina college students. Thus far the model has only been

researched with predominantly White samples and this study establishes a foundation to

extend that research to ethnic minority groups. Additionally, dimensions of acculturative

stress should be studied in relation to eating pathology and body image with Latina college

students. In addition to the established sociocultural model, which includes information,

29
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

pressure, and internalization, ethnic minority women may have added stressors which

contribute to heightened psychological concerns. Lastly, self-compassion may buffer against

the negative impact of acculturative stress on depressive symptoms. To date, there are only a

handful of studies examining the construct of self-compassion with ethnic minority groups,

however it may prove to be a fruitful area of research. If clinical treatment can focus on

teaching self-compassion skills, it may reduce the risk of negative psychological outcomes

among minority groups.

Despite the valuable findings in this study, certain limitations should be noted. First,

the present study is a correlation design. While this type of research establishes the presence

of a relationship and serves as a promising foundation, a causal direction between variables

cannot be observed or established. Second, there is the possibility for self- report errors since

self-report measures were used. Participants may have been biased, dishonest, or may not

have understood specific questions, which is always a concern when using self-report

questionnaires. Finally, there is the issue of generalizability. This sample was predominantly

19-year-old college students in West Texas. Given this specific sample, it is difficult to

determine whether these findings would be applicable to other geographical locations,

populations, or ethnic minority groups. Further replications with multiple, diverse samples

would help address this issue.

This study demonstrates that different dimensions of sociocultural pressures have

varying relationships with eating pathology, body image, exercise, and depressive symptoms.

Thus, future research could examine whether these negative outcomes related to eating and

body image are a coping mechanism for sociocultural stressors or are directly related to the

different messages from the majority culture and culture of origin. Additionally, future

30
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

research on self-compassion with ethnic minority women, and integration into clinical

treatment, may be beneficial. If young adults can learn these skills, it may protect them

against them from developing poor eating behaviors, body concerns, or depression. Overall,

this study builds on existing literature highlighting the relationship between sociocultural

pressures and eating pathology, and the benefits of self-compassion for negative

psychological outcomes.

31
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

References

Alegria, M., Woo, M., Cao, Z., Torres, M., Meng, X. L., & Striegel-Moore, R. (2007).
Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in Latinos in the United
States. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, S15-S21. doi:
10.1002/eat.20406

Adkins, E. C., & Keel, P. K. (2005). Does “excessive” or “compulsive” best describe
exercise as a symptom of bulimia nervosa?. International Journal of Eating
Disorders, 38, 24-29. doi: 10.1002/eat.20140

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental


Disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.

Aubrey, J. S. (2010). Looking good versus feeling good: An investigation of media


frames of health advice and their effects on women’s body-related self-
perceptions. Sex Roles, 63, 50-63. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9768-4

Austin, J. L., & Smith, J. E. (2008). Thin ideal internalization in Mexican girls: A test of
the sociocultural model of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating
Disorders, 41, 448-457. doi: 10.1002/eat.20529

Avalos, L., Tylka, T. L., & Wood-Barcalow, N. (2005). The body appreciation scale:
Development and psychometric evaluation. Body image, 2, 285-297. doi:
10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.06.002

Baker, A. M., Soto, J. A., Perez, C. R., & Lee, E. A. (2012). Acculturative status and
psychological well-being in an Asian American sample. Asian American Journal
of Psychology, 3, 275. doi: 10.1037/a0026842

Bedford, J. L., & Johnson, C. S. (2006). Societal influences on body image dissatisfaction in
younger and older women. Journal of Women & Aging, 18, 41-55.

Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International


journal of intercultural relations, 29, 697-712.

Breines, J., Toole, A., Tu, C., & Chen, S. (2014). Self-compassion, body image, and self-
reported disordered eating. Self and Identity, 13, 432-448. doi:
10.1080/15298868.2013.838992

Caballero AR, Sunday SR, Halmi KA. (2003). A comparison of cognitive and behavioral
symptoms between Mexican and American eating disorder patients. Int J Eat
Disord 2003;34:136–141. doi: 10.1002/eat.10150

Cachelin, F. M., Rebeck, R., Veisel, C., & Striegel-Moore, R. H. (2001). Barriers to
treatment for eating disorders among ethnically diverse women. International

32
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Journal of Eating Disorders, 30, 269-278. doi: 10.1002/eat.1084

Cachelin, F. M., Rebeck, R. M., Chung, G. H., & Pelayo, E. (2002). Does ethnicity
influence body-size preference? A comparison of body image and body
size. Obesity research, 10, 158-166. doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.25

Cano, M. Á., Schwartz, S. J., Castillo, L. G., Romero, A. J., Huang, S., Lorenzo-Blanco,
E. I., & Lizzi, K. M. (2015). Depressive symptoms and externalizing behaviors
among Hispanic immigrant adolescents: Examining longitudinal effects of
cultural stress. Journal of Adolescence, 42, 31-39. doi:
10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.03.017

Carter, S. K., & Ortiz, M. M. (2008). Ideal Female and Male Bodies: An Analysis of
College Students' Drawings. The Journal of Public and Professional
Sociology, 2, 4. doi: 10.1007/s40806-015-0020-x

Castillo, L. G., Navarro, R. L., Walker, J. E. O., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L.,
Whitbourne, S. K., & Caraway, S. J. (2015). Gender matters: The influence of
acculturation and acculturative stress on Latino college student depressive
symptomatology. Journal of Latina/o Psychology, 3, 40.
doi.org/10.1037/lat0000030

Cervantes, R. C., Cardoso, J. B., & Goldbach, J. T. (2015). Examining differences in


culturally based stress among clinical and nonclinical Hispanic
adolescents. Cultural diversity and ethnic minority psychology, 21, 458. doi:
10.1037/a0037879

Ciao, A. C., Loth, K., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2014). Preventing eating disorder
pathology: common and unique features of successful eating disorders prevention
programs. Current psychiatry reports, 16, 453. doi:
10.1007/s11920-014-0453-0

Cooper, P. J., Taylor, M. J., Cooper, Z., & Fairbum, C. G. (1987). The development and
validation of the Body Shape Questionnaire. International Journal of eating
disorders, 6, 485-494. doi.org/10.1002/1098-108

Crago, M., & Shisslak, C. M. (2003). Ethnic differences in dieting, binge eating, and
purging behaviors among American females: A review. Eating disorders, 11,
289-304. doi: 10.1080/10640260390242515

Croll, J., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., & Ireland, M. (2002). Prevalence and risk and
protective factors related to disordered eating behaviors among adolescents:
relationship to gender and ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 166-
175. doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00368-3

Culbert, K. M., Racine, S. E., & Klump, K. L. (2015). Research Review: What we have

33
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

learned about the causes of eating disorders–a synthesis of sociocultural,


psychological, and biological research. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 56, 1141-1164. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12441

Chin Evans, P., & McConnell, A. R. (2003). Do racial minorities respond in the same
way to mainstream beauty standards? Social comparison processes in Asian,
Black, and White women. Self and Identity, 2, 153-167.
doi.org/10.1080/15298860309030

Conlin, L., & Bissell, K. (2014). Beauty Ideals in the Checkout Aisle: Health-Related
Messages in Women's Fashion and Fitness Magazines. Journal of Magazine &
New Media Research, 15.

Dalle Grave, R., Calugi, S., & Marchesini, G. (2008). Compulsive exercise to control
shape or weight in eating disorders: prevalence, associated features, and treatment
outcome. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49, 346-352. doi:
10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.12.007

De Young, K. P., & Anderson, D. A. (2010). Prevalence and correlates of exercise


motivated by negative affect. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43,
50-58. doi: 10.1002/eat.20656

Driscoll, M. W., & Torres, L. (2013). Acculturative stress and Latino depression: The
mediating role of behavioral and cognitive resources. Cultural Diversity and
Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19, 373. doi: 10.1037/a0032821

Eisenberg, D., Gollust, S. E., Golberstein, E., & Hefner, J. L. (2007). Prevalence and
correlates of depression, anxiety, and suicidality among university
students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 534-542. doi:
10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.534

Eisenberg, D., Golberstein, E., & Hunt, J. B. (2009). Mental health and academic success
in college. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9.

Eisenberg, D., Nicklett, E. J., Roeder, K., & Kirz, N. E. (2011). Eating disorder
symptoms among college students: Prevalence, persistence, correlates, and
treatment-seeking. Journal of American College Health, 59, 700-707. doi:
10.1080/07448481.2010.546461

Ferreira, C., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, C. (2013). Self-compassion in the face of
shame and body image dissatisfaction: Implications for eating disorders. Eating
behaviors, 14, 207-210. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.01.005

Fitzpatrick, M. E., & Weltzin, T. (2014). Motivation for change as a predictor of eating
disorder treatment outcomes using a brief self-report YBC-EDS in a residential
eating disorder population. Eating behaviors, 15, 375-378.

34
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Franko, D. L. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and eating disorders: Considerations for DSM-
V. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, S31-S34.

Franko, D. L., Becker, A. E., Thomas, J. J., & Herzog, D. B. (2007). Cross-ethnic
differences in eating disorder symptoms and related distress. International
Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 156-164. doi: 10.1002/eat.20341

Garman, J. F., Hayduk, D. M., Crider, D. A., & Hodel, M. M. (2004). Occurrence of
exercise dependence in a college-aged population. Journal of American College
Health, 52, 221. doi: 10.3200/JACH.52.5.221-228

Garner, D. M., Olmsted, M. P., Bohr, Y., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1982). The eating attitudes
test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological medicine, 12,
871-878.

Gillen, M. M. (2015). Associations between positive body image and indicators of men's
and women's mental and physical health. Body Image, 13, 67-74.

Gitimu, P. N., Jameson, M. M., Turel, T., Pohle-Krauza, R., Mincher, J., Rowlands, Z., &
Elias, J. (2016). Appearance issues, depression, and disordered eating among
college females. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1196512.
doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1196512

Gordon, K. H., Castro, Y., Sitnikov, L., & Holm-Denoma, J. M. (2010). Cultural body
shape ideals and eating disorder symptoms among White, Latina, and Black
college women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 135.
doi:10.1037/a0018671

Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2006). Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the
United States: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 132, 622. doi:
10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.622

Grave, R. D. (2009). Features and management of compulsive exercising in eating


disorders. The Physician and sports medicine, 37, 20-28.

Grogan, S. (2010). Promoting positive body image in males and females: Contemporary
issues and future directions. Sex Roles, 63, 757-765.
doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9894-z

Guidi, J., Pender, M., Hollon, S. D., Zisook, S., Schwartz, F. H., Pedrelli, P., & Petersen,
T. J. (2009). The prevalence of compulsive eating and exercise among college
students: An exploratory study. Psychiatry Research, 165, 154-162. doi:
10.1016/j.psychres.2007.10.005

Gutzwiller, J., Oliver, J. M., & Katz, B. M. (2003). Eating dysfunctions in college

35
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

women: The roles of depression and attachment to fathers. Journal of American


College Health, 52, 27-32. doi.org/10.1080/07448480309595720

Halliwell, E. (2013). The impact of thin idealized media images on body satisfaction:
Does body appreciation protect women from negative effects?. Body
Image, 10, 509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.004

Harring, H. A., Montgomery, K., & Hardin, J. (2010). Perceptions of body weight,
weight management strategies, and depressive symptoms among US college
students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 43-50. doi:
10.1080/07448481.2010.483705

Holland, L. A., Brown, T. A., & Keel, P. K. (2014). Defining features of unhealthy
exercise associated with disordered eating and eating disorder
diagnoses. Psychology of sport and exercise, 15, 116-123. doi:
10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.10.005

Homan, K. J., & Tylka, T. L. (2014). Appearance-based exercise motivation moderates


the relationship between exercise frequency and positive body image. Body
image, 11, 101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.01.003

Hudson, J. I., Hiripi, E., Pope Jr, H. G., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). The prevalence and
correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey
Replication. Biological psychiatry, 61, 348-358. doi:
10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040

Ibrahim, A. K., Kelly, S. J., Adams, C. E., & Glazebrook, C. (2013). A systematic review
of studies of depression prevalence in university students. Journal of psychiatric
research, 47, 391-400. doi:
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.11.015

Karazsia, B. T., Murnen, S. K., & Tylka, T. L. (2017). Is body dissatisfaction changing
across time? A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 143, 293.
doi: 10.1037/bul0000081

Keel, K. Pamela (2015). Eating Disorders. Oxford University Press.

Keery, H., Van den Berg, P., & Thompson, J. K. (2004). An evaluation of the Tripartite
Influence Model of body dissatisfaction and eating disturbance with adolescent
girls. Body image, 1, 237-251. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.03.001

Kempa, M. L., & Thomas, A. J. (2000). Culturally sensitive assessment and treatment of
eating disorders. Eating Disorders, 8, 17-30.
doi.org/10.1080/10640260008251209

LaMarre, A., & Rice, C. (2016). Normal Eating Is Counter-Cultural: Embodied Experiences

36
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

of Eating Disorder Recovery. Journal of Community & Applied


Social Psychology, 26, 136-149. doi.org/10.1002/casp.2240

LePage, M. L., & Crowther, J. H. (2010). The effects of exercise on body satisfaction and
affect. Body image, 7, 124-130. doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.12.002

Liefland, L., Roberts, D. L., Ford, R., & Stevens, B. J. (2014). Depressive symptoms
among help-seeking Latinas in a disadvantaged, urban, northeastern community
mental health center. Community mental health journal, 50, 331-335. doi:
10.1007/s10597-013-9655-x

Low, K. G., Charanasomboon, S., Brown, C., Hiltunen, G., Long, K., Reinhalter, K., &
Jones, H. (2003). Internalization of the thin ideal, weight and body image
concerns. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 31, 81-89.

Markland, D., & Hardy, L. (1993). The Exercise Motivations Inventory: Preliminary
development and validity of a measure of individuals' reasons for participation in
regular physical exercise. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 289-296.
doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90219-S

Marques, L., Alegria, M., Becker, A. E., Chen, C. N., Fang, A., Chosak, A., & Diniz, J.
B. (2011). Comparative prevalence, correlates of impairment, and service
utilization for eating disorders across US ethnic groups: Implications for reducing
ethnic disparities in health care access for eating disorders. International Journal
of Eating Disorders, 44, 412-420. doi: 10.1002/eat.20787

McComb, J. J. R., & Clopton, J. R. (2002). Explanatory variance in bulimia


nervosa. Women & health, 36, 115-123. doi: 10.1300/J013v36n04_09

Mehr, K. E., & Adams, A. C. (2016). Self-compassion as a mediator of maladaptive


perfectionism and depressive symptoms in college students. Journal of College
Student Psychotherapy, 30, 132-145. DOI: 10.1080/87568225.2016.1140991

Mejía, O. L., & McCarthy, C. J. (2010). Acculturative stress, depression, and anxiety in
migrant farmwork college students of Mexican heritage. International Journal of
stress management, 17, 1. doi: 10.1037/a0018119

Mena, F. J., Padilla, A. M., & Maldonado, M. (1987). Acculturative stress and specific
coping strategies among immigrant and later generation college
students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 207-225.
doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092006

Menselson, T., Rehkopf, D. H., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2008). Depression among Latinos
in the United States: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 76, 355. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.3.355

37
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Mond, J. M., & Calogero, R. M. (2009). Excessive exercise in eating disorder patients
and in healthy women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43,
227-234. doi: 10.1080/00048670802653323

Naragon-Gainey, K., Watson, D., & Markon, K. E. (2009). Differential relations of


depression and social anxiety symptoms to the facets of extraversion/positive
emotionality. Journal of abnormal psychology, 118, 299. doi:
10.1037/a0015637

Neely, M. E., Schallert, D. L., Mohammed, S. S., Roberts, R. M., & Chen, Y. J. (2009).
Self-kindness when facing stress: The role of self-compassion, goal regulation,
and support in college students’ well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 88-
97. doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9119-8

Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-


compassion. Self and identity, 2, 223-250. DOI: 10.1080/15298860309027

Neff, K. D. (2009). The role of self-compassion in development: A healthier way to relate


to oneself. Human development, 52, 211-214. doi: 10.1159/000215071

Neumark-Sztainer, D., Paxton, S. J., Hannan, P. J., Haines, J., & Story, M. (2006). Does
body satisfaction matter? Five-year longitudinal associations between body
satisfaction and health behaviors in adolescent females and males. Journal of
adolescent health, 39, 244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.12.001

Nishikawa, Y., Rubinstein, D., & Annunziato, R. A. (2013). Beyond Hispanics: Sub-
ethnic differences in depression, post-traumatic distress, and suicidal ideation
among patients with coronary heart disease. Ethnicity & disease, 23, 296-303.

Parent, M. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The
Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568-600. doi.org/10.1177/0011000012445176

Paxton, S. J., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Hannan, P. J., & Eisenberg, M. E. (2006). Body
dissatisfaction prospectively predicts depressive mood and low self-esteem in
adolescent girls and boys. Journal of clinical child and adolescent
psychology, 35, 539-549. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_5

Perez, M., Voelz, Z. R., Pettit, J. W., & Joiner Jr, T. E. (2002). The role of acculturative
stress and body dissatisfaction in predicting bulimic symptomatology across
ethnic groups. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 442-454. doi:
10.1002/eat.10006

Petersons, M., Rojhani, A., Steinhaus, N., & Larkin, B. (2000). Effect of ethnic identity
on attitudes, feelings, and behaviors toward food. Eating Disorders, 8, 207-
219. doi.org/10.1080/10640260008251228

38
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Reba-Harrelson, L., Von Holle, A., Hamer, R. M., Swann, R., Reyes, M. L., & Bulik, C.
M. (2009). Patterns and prevalence of disordered eating and weight control
behaviors in women ages 25–45. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on
Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 14, e190-e198.

Rodriguez, N., Myers, H. F., Mira, C. B., Flores, T., & Garcia-Hernandez, L. (2002).
Development of the Multidimensional Acculturative Stress Inventory for adults of
Mexican origin. Psychological Assessment, 14, 451.
DOI: 10.1037//1040-3590.14.4.451 ·

Shaw, H., Ramirez, L., Trost, A., Randall, P., & Stice, E. (2004). Body image and eating
disturbances across ethnic groups: More similarities than differences. Psychology
of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 12. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.12

Shaw, H. E., Stice, E., & Springer, D. W. (2004). Perfectionism, body dissatisfaction, and
self-esteem in predicting bulimic symptomatology: Lack of
replication. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 36, 41-47.
doi.org/10.1002/eat.20016

Shroff, H., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). Peer influences, body-image dissatisfaction, eating
dysfunction and self-esteem in adolescent girls. Journal of Health
Psychology, 11, 533-551. doi: 10.1177/1359105306065015

Solenberger, S. E. (2001). Exercise and eating disorders: a 3-year inpatient hospital


record analysis. Eating Behaviors, 2, 151-168.
doi.org/10.1016/S1471-0153(01)00026-5

Stein, K. F., Corte, C., & Ronis, D. L. (2010). Personal identities and disordered eating
behaviors in Mexican American women. Eating behaviors, 11, 197-200. doi:
10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.02.001

Stice, E. (2001). A prospective test of the dual-pathway model of bulimic pathology:


mediating effects of dieting and negative affect. Journal of abnormal
psychology, 110, 124. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.124

Stice, E., & Shaw, H. E. (2002). Role of body dissatisfaction in the onset and
maintenance of eating pathology: A synthesis of research findings. Journal of
psychosomatic research, 53, 985-993. doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00488-9

Stice, E., Becker, C. B., & Yokum, S. (2013). Eating disorder prevention: Current
evidence-base and future directions. International Journal of Eating
Disorders, 46, 478-485. doi: 10.1002/eat.22105

Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Cachelin, F. M. (2001). Etiology of eating disorders in


women. The counseling psychologist, 29, 635-661.

39
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Taranis, L., Touyz, S., & Meyer, C. (2011). Disordered eating and exercise: development
and preliminary validation of the compulsive exercise test (CET). European
Eating Disorders Review, 19, 256-268. doi: 10.1002/erv.1108

Taylor, M. B., Daiss, S., & Krietsch, K. (2015). Associations among self-compassion,
mindful eating, eating disorder symptomatology, and body mass index in college
students. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1, 229.

Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Dodos, L., Chatzisarantis, N., & Ntoumanis, N. (2017). A


Diary Study of Self-Compassion, Upward Social Comparisons, and Body Image-
Related Outcomes. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 9, 242-258.
doi: 10.1111/aphw.12089

Thompson, J. K., Van Den Berg, P., Roehrig, M., Guarda, A. S., & Heinberg, L. J.
(2004). The sociocultural attitudes towards appearance scale-3 (SATAQ-3):
Development and validation. International journal of eating disorders, 35,
293-304. doi: 10.1002/eat.10257

Tiggemann, M. (2003). Media exposure, body dissatisfaction and disordered eating:


Television and magazines are not the same!. European Eating Disorders Review:
The Professional Journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 11, 418-430.
doi.org/10.1002/erv.502

Torres, L., & Rollock, D. (2007). Acculturation and depression among Hispanics: The
moderating effect of intercultural competence. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic
Minority Psychology, 13, 10. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.10

Torres, L., Driscoll, M. W., & Voell, M. (2012). Discrimination, acculturation,


acculturative stress, and Latino psychological distress: A moderated mediational
model. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18, 17.
doi: 10.1037/a0026710

Tylka, T. L., Russell, H. L., & Neal, A. A. (2015). Self-compassion as a moderator of


thinness-related pressures' associations with thin-ideal internalization and
disordered eating. Eating behaviors, 17, 23-26. doi:
10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.12.009

Tylka, T. L., & Kroon Van Diest, A. M. (2015). Protective factors. The Wiley handbook
of eating disorders, 430-444.

Vartanian, L. R., Wharton, C. M., & Green, E. B. (2012). Appearance vs. health motives
for exercise and for weight loss. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 251-256.
doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.005

40
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Warren, C. S., Gleaves, D. H., Cepeda-Benito, A., Fernandez, M. D. C., & Rodriguez-
Ruiz, S. (2005). Ethnicity as a protective factor against internalization of a thin
ideal and body dissatisfaction. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37,
241-249. doi: 10.1002/eat.20102

Warren, C. S., Gleaves, D. H., & Rakhkovskaya, L. M. (2013). Score reliability and factor
similarity of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-3
(SATAQ-3) among four ethnic groups. Journal of eating disorders, 1, 14.

Wasylkiw, L., MacKinnon, A. L., & MacLellan, A. M. (2012). Exploring the link
between self-compassion and body image in university women. Body image, 9,
236-245. doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.01.007

White, S., Reynolds-Malear, J. B., & Cordero, E. (2011). Disordered eating and the use
of unhealthy weight control methods in college students: 1995, 2002, and
2008. Eating disorders, 19, 323-334. doi:
10.1080/10640266.2011.584805

Wildes, J. E., Simons, A. D., & Marcus, M. D. (2005). Bulimic symptoms, cognitions,
and body dissatisfaction in women with major depressive disorder. International
Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 9-17. doi: 10.1002/eat.20152

Zivin, K., Eisenberg, D., Gollust, S. E., & Golberstein, E. (2009). Persistence of mental
health problems and needs in a college student population. Journal of affective
disorders, 117, 180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.001

41
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendices

Appendix A

Extended Literature Review

The Latinx community is one of the fastest growing minority groups in the United

States, currently accounting for 17% of the total population (U.S. Census Bureau 2013) and

projected to represent 31% of the total population by 2060 (U.S. Census Bureau, Population

Division, 2012 National Population Projections, Projections of the Population by Sex, Race,

and Hispanic Origin for the United States: 2015 to 2060). The growth in the Latinx

population has also influenced the growth in the Latinx college student population. Latinx

represented the second largest group of the traditional college age population (18-24 years

old), with college enrollment projected to increase by 27% between 2011 and 2022 (National

Center for Education Statistics, Projections of Education Statistics to 2022, 2014). College is

a time where students are particularly vulnerable to negative health outcomes, and given the

increasing rates of enrollment among Latinx individuals, it is critical to acknowledge a

community that is particularly at risk. The primary aim of this literature review is to provide

a summary of the prevalence, risk factors, protective factors, and correlates of disordered

eating behaviors, specifically focusing on the Latina college student population.

Disordered Eating

Clinical eating disorders are characterized as disturbances in body image and eating

behavior and disproportionately affect women in the United States (Somlak & Striegel-

Moore, 2001). The estimated lifetime prevalence is 0.9% for anorexia nervosa, 1.5% for

bulimia nervosa, and 2.8% for binge eating disorder (Hudson, Hiripi, Pope, & Kessler, 2007).

However, more subtle forms of unhealthy eating behaviors that do not meet the severity or

42
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

frequency to warrant a diagnosis of a clinical eating disorder are broadly referred to as

disordered eating behaviors. Disordered eating behaviors occur at a much higher rate than

clinical eating disorders and refer to unhealthy eating patterns such as restricting food intake,

binge eating, and dieting (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Research suggests that

up to 70% of women display unhealthy relationships with food and weight concerns, and

45% of women engage in compulsive (also referred to as compensatory) exercise (Reba-

Harrelson, Von Holle, Hamer, Swann, Reyes, & Bulik, 2009; Dalle Grave, Calugi, &

Marchesini, 2008). Discussions and behaviors surrounding food, dieting, body size, exercise,

and other weight control methods have become commonplace in mainstream Western

culture, therefore it is not surprising that many women have developed problematic

relationships with food and their body. Unfortunately, engaging in these behaviors can often

lead to negative physiological and psychological health outcomes, and is one of the most

well-established indicators for the development of a clinical eating disorder (Striegel-Moore

& Cachelin, 2001).

University students are particularly susceptible to the development of eating

pathology. The literature consistently highlights that eating concerns are a widespread

problem among college students and are particularly prevalent among college-aged women.

In a study by White, Reynolds-Malear, and Cordero (2011), researchers collected data over a

13-year period to assess eating and unhealthy weight control behaviors in undergraduate

students. Results indicated an increase over time in unhealthy eating behaviors and weight

control methods. Similarly, Eisenberg, D., Nicklett, E. J., Roeder, K., & Kirz, N. E. (2011)

surveyed a large sample of undergraduate students and found that 13.5% of women screened

positive for maladaptive eating behaviors and still displayed consistent symptoms 2 years

43
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

later.

Although disordered eating behaviors were once thought to affect only White women,

extensive research now suggests that minority women have equal or greater risk for

developing eating concerns. The few studies on disordered eating in Latinas suggest

prevalence rates similar to or greater than Whites in the United States (Alegria et al., 2007;

Caballero, Sunday, & Halmi, 2003), specifically with binge eating and bulimic symptoms. In

a study by Alegria et al. (2007), researchers analyzed data from the National Latino and

Asian American Study, a national epidemiological household survey of Latinos in the United

States, and found that Latinos had elevated rates of any binge eating and binge eating

disorder but low prevalence of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Similarly, a study by

Marques and colleagues (2011), found that Latinos reported more binge eating symptoms

than their non-Latino White counterparts. Finally, in a study with 4,023 women ages 25-45,

Reba and colleagues (2009), found that of the 539 participants that identified as Latina, 8.9%

engaged in vomiting, 12.0% used laxatives, 13.1% used diuretics, 45.1% used diet pills,

24.%% engaged in excessive exercise, and 19.0% engaged in restriction of food.

Additionally, out of the Latina sample, 69.5% endorsed weight loss attempts, and 74%

endorsed concerns about weight/shape. While studies demonstrate slight variations in

prevalence rates of specific types behaviors, and how they present in comparison to peer

groups, it is evident that Latinas are not immune to the development of problematic eating

behaviors.

Body Image

Body image is a multidimensional construct, which refers to the thoughts and feelings

one has towards their body (Grogan, 2008). This evaluation of one’s body has received

44
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

considerable attention within the past few years, including aspects of both negative and

positive body image (Tylka & Wood-Barcalow, 2015). Body dissatisfaction, the negative

evaluation of one’s body, or specific body features, is not a recent discovery (Tiggemann,

2003), and has increasingly become a normative part of Western culture. Research suggests

that at least 50% of women display some level of dissatisfaction with their body or specific

body parts (Grabe & Hyde, 2006), and the prevalence rates continue to increase. While body

dissatisfaction is typical for women of all ages, rates are alarmingly high among female

college students (Tiggemann, 2003).

As numerous researchers have observed and documented, women are continuously

bombarded with messages from their social environment suggesting that they must be thin to

be considered attractive. Over the past three decades, the frequency of these unrealistic, and

unattainable standards of these messages have been amplified to a point at which it is not

surprising that women would become increasingly dissatisfied with their own body image

(Karazsia, Murnen, & Tylka, 2017). The high rates of body dissatisfaction among women is

concerning because it can lead to negative physical and mental health consequences. Body

dissatisfaction has been associated with higher levels of disordered eating behaviors and

depressive symptoms among young adult women (Neumark-Sztainer, Paxton, Hannan,

Haines, & Story, 2006; Stice, 2002; Shaw, Stice, & Springer, 2004). Consistent with

literature on disordered eating, body dissatisfaction does not differ among women from

different backgrounds or ethnic groups (Grabe & Hyde, 2006).

Ethnicity may influence body area dissatisfaction because the ideals of beauty are

noticeably different based on culture. A thin physical appearance is considered the beauty

ideal among mainstream Western culture, whereas traditional Latinx culture emphasizes a

45
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

curvier physique. Research with ethnically diverse samples suggests that body dissatisfaction

tends to be highest among Latinas and lowest among Black women (Croll, Neumark-

Sztainer, Story, & Ireland, 2002), although there is much speculation as to why this

discrepancy exists. Furthermore, one study with college women found that Latinas

demonstrate higher rates of desire to be thin and more body dissatisfaction than White

women (McComb & Clopton, 2002), however findings between these two groups of women

have shown mixed results, as other studies have suggested no differences in levels of body

dissatisfaction (Cachelin, Rebeck, Chung, & Pelayo, 2002; Shaw, Ramirez, Trost, Randall, &

Stice, 2004).

In addition to aspects of a negative body image, researchers have shifted their focus

to include positive aspects of body image, such as body appreciation. Positive body image

may be beneficial for physical and psychological health and has been established as a

separate construct than negative body image or low levels of body dissatisfaction. (Tylka &

Wood-Barcalow, 2015). Body appreciation refers to an acceptance one’s body regardless of

size or imperfections and valuing one’s body by engaging in healthy behaviors, despite

receiving messages about the thin ideal from the media (Avalos et al., 2005). There is a

growing body of research to support the positive effects of body appreciation. Individuals

with high levels of body appreciation engage in behaviors to promote their physical and

mental health. Additionally, body appreciation has been associated with less depressive

symptoms and lower disordered eating behaviors (Gillen, 2015). Given the relative novelty

of positive body image research, there are very few studies examining body appreciation

among ethnic minority women. However, the beneficial effects seen with women, in the

46
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

general population, provide sufficient evidence to believe similar effects would extend to the

Latina community.

Exercise Behaviors

Compulsive exercise is an unhealthy drive to exercise despite negative physical and

psychological outcomes. Common symptoms of compulsive exercise include feelings of guilt

and anxiety when exercise is missed, sacrificing social activities or other priorities to

exercise, and continuing to exercise despite physical limitations or consequences (Dalle,

Calugi, Machesisin, 2007; Taranis, Toiyz & Meyer, 2011). Past research suggests that

compulsive exercise co-exists with higher levels of dietary restraint, weight and shape

concerns, drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction, and bulimic tendencies (Grave, Calugi,

Marschesini, 2008; Solenberger, 2001; Adkins & Keel, 2005). Using exercise as a

mechanism to control weight, and “purge” unwanted calories, is typical among women with

clinical eating disorders, specifically those with anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa

((Meyer, Taranis, & Touyz, 2008; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Furthermore,

college students are at-risk for engaging in this type of excessive exercise as a means to

control their weight. Studies have documented a large prevalence of compulsive exercise

among college women with rates ranging from 18.1% to 45.9%. (Guidi, Pender, & Hollon,

2007; Garman, Hayduk, Crider, & Hodel, 2004).

Compulsive exercise is often considered the most challenging behavior to treat

among individuals with disordered eating behaviors (Dalle, Calugi, Machesisin, 2007; Grave,

2009). This may be attributed to the complex nature of exercise. Other behaviors that are

associated with disordered eating are widely accepted as being unhealthy, however exercise

is ordinarily perceived as a healthy activity, which makes it problematic specifically in the

47
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

context of eating pathology. The exercise activities of individuals that engage in disordered

eating are often extreme, obsessive, and obligatory in nature. For example, exercise has been

related to positive mental health outcomes for individuals who did not engage in disordered

eating including lower depressive symptoms and higher levels of satisfaction with their body,

but negative outcomes for those who did engage in disordered eating, including higher levels

of depressive symptoms, negative affect, and poor body image (De Young & Anderson,

2010).

Thus, it might be important to look beyond the exercise itself and look at the

intentions behind exercise. Past research suggests that individuals who engage in exercise for

appearance management reasons may be more likely to develop eating pathology, and have a

negative view of their body, than individuals who exercise for more health and fitness-

oriented reasons (La Page & Crowther, 2010). In a study by Mond and Calogero (2009),

researchers surveyed women with eating disorders and women without eating disorders on a

range of disordered exercise behaviors and found that exercising for physical attractiveness,

or to influence weight was the strongest differentiating marker between the two groups.

Because certain reasons for exercise are accompanied by eating pathology and body

dissatisfaction, researchers have started categorizing them into positive and negative clusters,

with health and fitness related reasons as being positive and appearance or weight control

reasons being negative (Vartanian, Wharton, & Green, 2012).

Depressive Symptoms

Major depression is a common mental health disorder in the United States. According

to the National Institute of Mental Health (2016), 6.7% of all adults reported having at least

one major episode over the past year, with prevalence rates being highest among females

48
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

(8.5%) and adults between the ages of 18-25 (10.9%). College students appear to be

particularly susceptible to depressive symptoms, with research suggesting that initial

episodes often surfacing during this time period (Ibrahim, Kelly, Adams, & Glazebrook,

2013). A recent meta-analysis reviewed 24 articles published between 1990-2010 examining

prevalence rates among college students, and found the mean weighted prevalence to be

30.6%, which was substantially higher than what is typically seen in the general population

(Ibrahim et al., 2013).There is a growing body of research which studies suggest that females

college students are at higher risk for depression than males. For example, in a study with

2,700 university students in the United States, females reported higher levels of depressive

symptoms than males Eisenberg, Golberstein, and Hunt (2009). Additionally, in a study with

677 female undergraduate students, 7.3% endorsed depressive symptoms while 6.5% met

criteria for major depression disorder (Eisenberg, Gollust, Golberstein, & Hefner, 2007). This

developmental stage can be very challenging for young adults as they try to balance the

demands and stressors of their environment. Although elevated depressive symptoms are

often viewed as a normative component during this phase of life, they can lead to serious

negative physical and psychological consequences (National Institute of Mental Health,

2011; Zivin, Eisenberg, Gollust, & Golberstein, 2009).

Ethnic minority women are particularly at-risk for developing depressive symptoms.

In a meta-analysis by Mendelson, Rehkopf, and Kubzansky (2008), researchers analyzed 23

studies on the prevalence of depressive symptoms among Latinos in the United States and

found significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms among Latinos compared with non-

Latino. Additionally, results from their analysis of the female-only sample suggested that

ethnic group differences in depressive symptoms may be slightly larger among women than

49
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

in the general population and women are more likely to experience depression than men in

both Latino and non-Latino White populations. Past literature has established the high

prevalence rates of depressive symptoms among college students and ethnic minority women

(Liefland, Roberts, Ford, & Stevens, 2014; Nishikawa, Rubinstein, & Annunziato, 2013).

Depressive symptoms often co-exist with other negative mental health outcomes. For

example, depressive symptoms and disordered eating behaviors have consistently

demonstrated a high comorbidity rate (Fitzpatrick & Weltzin, 2014; Holland, Brown, & Keel,

2014). One study found that participants diagnosed with an eating disorder displayed clinical

levels of depression, whereas participants with an eating dysfunction displayed mild levels of

depressive symptoms, and those with no eating disorder or dysfunction displayed the lowest

levels of depression (Gutzwiller et al., 2003). A recent meta-analysis, including 30 studies,

researchers demonstrated the bi-directional relationship between eating pathology and

depression, where eating pathology significantly predicted depression and depression

significantly predicted eating pathology (Francis et al., 2015). A well-documented

relationship between depression and body dissatisfaction also exists. Research suggests that

women who feel negatively about their bodies and displayed depressive symptoms were at a

higher risk for engaging in maladaptive eating behaviors (Harring, Montgomery, & Hardin,

2010). This association between depressive symptoms and body dissatisfaction has been seen

throughout the literature as body dissatisfaction has been positively associated with

depression among females in both non-clinical and clinical samples (Paxton, Neumark-

Sztainer, Hannan, & Eisenberg, 2006; Wildes et al., 2005).

Sociocultural Model

50
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Sociocultural pressure has been established as one the strongest influence on eating

pathology and body disturbance in Western societies (Culbert, Racine, & Klump, 2015).

Sociocultural theorists suggest that culture-specific ideals, expectations, and messages

contribute to the development and maintenance of disordered eating and body image

concerns. Several studies over the past few decades highlight how mainstream American

culture promotes eating pathology by emphasizing physical appearance as one of the most

important aspects for a woman, and valuing an extremely slender physique above all else

(LaMarre, & Rice, 2016). In mainstream American culture, the ideal appearance for women

is thin, with a small waist, light eyes, a large bust, White skin color, and long legs (Carter &

Ortiz, 2008), and women often feel pressure from their social environment to attain these

beauty ideals. However, because these ideals may not be achievable, young women

experience dissatisfaction with their bodies and can develop eating pathology (Shroff &

Thompson, 2006). Nevertheless, there is individual variation in the extent to which women

internalize, or adopt, pressures about this beauty ideal. Although the majority of women are

exposed to these mainstream messages on beauty, research has shown that the combination

of both awareness and internalization of these messages is what contributes to body

dissatisfaction and eating pathology. Overall, as awareness and internalization of ideals for

thinness increase, so does eating disorder symptomology (Keery, van den Berg, &

Thompson, 2004).

The powerful influence of the media has been extended to compulsive exercise and

motivation for exercise as well. In the past few years researchers have examined media

content within health and fitness magazines and found that the women are often portrayed

with the thin ideal. These magazines appear to promote a healthy lifestyle and provide health

51
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

advice while still valuing the idea of being thin and focusing on appearance rather than

overall health (Conlin & Bissell, 2014). For example, a study by Aubrey (2010), found that

women’s health magazines promoted appearance-based messages as frequently and

noticeably as they promoted health related content. These findings suggest that media may

influence why women choose to exercise. In promoting the thin ideal and appearance-based

messages, women may be influenced to engage in exercise in order to achieve this falsely

advertised “healthy lifestyle” with the ultimate goal of improving their appearance rather

than their physical health.

To date, there is still very little known about eating pathology among Latina women,

and specifically on the role of sociocultural factors. Compared to mainstream White

American culture, traditional Latina beauty standards are encouraging of larger figures and

do not value the slender physique as the ideal for attractiveness (Cachelin et al., 2000; Austin

& Smith, 2008). This may cause distress for Latina women as they attempt to negotiate their

own beliefs on beauty ideals both within their culture and the majority culture. Additionally,

minority women may be at particular risk because the ideal appearance for American women

may be unattainable for many ethnic women given variation in genetic factors (Stein, Corte,

& Ronis, 2010). The handful of studies on sociocultural pressure reveal that among Latina

college women, internalization of this mainstream beauty ideal is positively associated to

eating disorder symptoms and body dissatisfaction (Warren et al., 2005; Aviña, 2008). It is

possible that some Latina women receive and internalize mainstream cultural messages

regarding weight, body image, and appearance despite traditional views of beauty from their

culture of origin.

52
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Sociocultural models have primarily focused on messages that promote mainstream

American culture. However, when considering minority women, this represents an

incomplete picture. Latina women may have their own cultural values and beliefs, which can

conflict with the beauty ideals represented in typical mainstream culture. This may cause an

internal struggle for minority women as they balance these two opposing perspectives

(Aviña, 2008). Consequently, it is imperative to understand how culture of origin plays a role

in negotiating between potentially conflicting beliefs about beauty ideals and physical

attractiveness, and how media, peers, and family members contribute to this process (Warren,

Castillo, & Gleaves, 2009). Examining sociocultural pressures among Latina women requires

a closer look at variations within the culture. This study provides an initial step in exploring

these constructs among Latinas and potentially sets the foundation for further analysis of

within-culture variations. If mainstream American culture and social pressure to be thin are

pivotal in the development and maintenance of eating pathology and body dissatisfaction, as

the sociocultural model proposes, it may be advantageous to identify factors that can protect

against such influences, such as self-compassion.

Acculturative Stress

Research with ethnically diverse populations warrants the inclusion of cultural

variables that my influence or exacerbate psychological distress. Scholars have increasingly

recognized the significance of acculturative stress on mental health outcomes. While the

process of acculturation refers to an individual’s navigation of attitudes and behaviors

between their culture of origin and the majority culture, the adverse psychological impact of

this process is referred to as acculturative stress (Berry, 1998; Berry, 2005). Although the

process of acculturation may not be inherently stressful for everyone, some individuals

53
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

experience an internal conflict as they attempt to resolve differences between differing

cultural beliefs, norms, and values (Torres, Driscoll, & Voell, 2012). Adverse external

stressors may also increase acculturative stress, including discrimination from the majority

culture or rejection from the culture of origin.

The college years are seen as a transitional period where young adults are particularly

susceptible to experiencing adverse mental health outcomes. For minority students, the

difficulties associated with this time may be exacerbated by the additional stressors of being

an ethnic minority within a majority culture. Acculturative stress has been associated with

increased depressive symptoms among Latinx college students in the United States (Cano et

al., 2015; Castillo et al., 2015; Cervantes, Cardoso, & Goldbach, 2015). The harmful

influence of acculturative stress also extends to body image and eating behavior. A growing

body of evidence suggests a positive relationship between acculturative stress and disordered

eating behaviors among minority groups. For example, Perez, Voelz, Pettit, and Joiner

(2002) found that acculturative stress moderated the relationship between body

dissatisfaction and bulimic symptomatology in Latina women, such that the relationship was

stronger for women reporting higher levels of acculturative stress than for those reporting

lower levels of acculturative stress. This study highlights the influence of acculturative stress

as minority women who do not endorse high levels of acculturative stress do not endorse

bulimic symptoms even if they are dissatisfied with their bodies (Perez et al., 2002). Another

study among Latinas found that acculturative stress predicts drive for thinness (Gordon et al.,

2010). Some researchers suggest that ethnic minority women may engage in disordered

eating behaviors as an attempt to cope with acculturative stress, whereas other researchers

attribute these behaviors with the acculturate stress associated with valuing Western cultural

54
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

beauty ideals (Kempa & Thomas, 2000). Results from these studies document the significant

relationship between acculturative stress and eating pathology.

Self-Compassion

Research on disordered eating behaviors has typically focused on identifying and

minimizing risk factors, including sociocultural pressure and acculturative stress. However,

in recent years, researchers have turned their attention to recognizing strengths that may

serve as protective mechanisms (Ciao, Loth, & Neumark-Sztainer, 2014; Tylka & Kroon Van

Diest, 2015). These protective factors interrupt the way in which risk factors influence a

negative outcome. By definition, a protective factor should reduce the chances of an

unwanted outcome and increase the chances of a desired outcome (Smolak, 2012).

Self-compassion has been consistently identified as a protective mechanism for

psychological health and has recently made its way into literature on disordered eating. Self-

compassion is defined as the ability to treat oneself with kindness and understanding rather

than judgment, recognize connection to humanity rather than isolation, and bring negative

thoughts and emotions into awareness rather than over-identifying with them (Neff, 2003). It

reflects concern and compassion toward others, but it also reflects being able to express this

same concern and compassion toward oneself (Neely, Schallert, Mohammed, Roberts, &

Chen, 2009). One key aspect of self-compassion is a healthy self-acceptance, and kindness

towards one’s inadequacies (Neely et al., 2009). Recent research has demonstrated a positive

relationship between self-compassion and psychological health, including happiness,

optimism, and decreased anxiety, and depressive symptomatology (Neff, 2009).

The literature highlights self-compassion as a protective factor for eating pathology

and body image concerns. In one study with college students, researchers found that higher

55
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

self-compassion predicted lower eating disorder symptomology (Taylor, Krietsch, & Daiss,

2015). Additionally, past literature on self-compassion and body dissatisfaction has yielded

consistent findings: higher levels of self-compassion have been associated with greater body

acceptance in college student samples (Wasylkiw et al., 2012), whereas lower self-

compassion has been associated with body dissatisfaction (Ferreira, Pinto-Gouveia, &

Duarte, 2013). Another noteworthy study demonstrated that practicing self-compassion in

response to negative appearance-related thoughts was related to lower rates of disordered

eating and body image concerns (Breines, Toole, Tu & Chen, 2014). These findings indicate

that self-compassion may predict lower levels of disordered eating since it promotes a

healthier relationship with one’s body and appearance.

Yet only one study has investigated how self-compassion protects against

sociocultural pressures. In a study by Tylka (2015), researchers found that self-compassion

mitigates the effects of sociocultural on disordered eating behaviors. However, this study has

never been replicated with college students or minority women. It is possible that women

with higher levels of self-compassion can combat these unrealistic beauty ideals, which could

minimize body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behavior. Thus, pressure to be thin or

have a specific body shape may be countered by a compassionate stance towards oneself and

an appreciation of one’s body, regardless of size or cultural norms. Furthermore, there are

virtually no studies examining the role of self-compassion specifically among Latina women,

which may be particularly beneficial for a group vulnerable to body dissatisfaction and eating

pathology.

56
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix B

Table 1
Model 2. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Sociocultural Internalization

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Depressive Symptoms
Step 1 .04 .04
Sociocultural Internalization .25 .05 .44 .09 .22
Step 2 .23 .09
Sociocultural Internalization .11 -.084 .31 .10 .10
Self-Compassion -3.41 -5.26 -1.56 .93 -.32
Step 3
Sociocultural Internalization .11 -.07 .316 .10 .10 .15 .03
Self-Compassion 16.66 -5.30 -1.65 .92 -.33
Interaction .250 .02 .45 .10 .18

Table 2
Model 3. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Sociocultural Pressure

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Disordered Eating
Step 1 .11 .12
Sociocultural Pressure .58 .31 .85 .11 -.38
Step 2 .14 .03
Sociocultural Pressure .49 .21 .77 .10 -.21
Self-Compassion -2.81 -5.46 -.17 .94 .51
Step 3 .16 .02
Sociocultural Pressure .52 -.51 -.10 2.22 -.22
Self-Compassion -2.49 4.51 8.29 .102 .50
Interaction .21 .000 .43 .92 .16

Table 3
Model 5. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for English Competency Pressure

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Depressive Symptoms
Step 1 .01 .01
English Competency Pressure .18 -.05 .41 .117 .13
Step 2 .22 .22
English Competency Pressure .28 .07 .48 .10 .21
Self-Compassion -5.15 -6.86 -3.44 .86 -.47

57
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Step 3
English Competency Pressure .21 .00 .42 .10 .16 .26 .04
Self-Compassion -5.38 -7.07 -3.70 .850 -.49
Interaction .26 .061 .46 .103 .20
Body Dissatisfaction
Step 1 .05 .06
English Competency Pressure 1.40 .45 2.35 .47 .25
Step 2 .32 .26
English Competency Pressure 1.91 1.09 2.73 .413 .34
Self-Compassion -25.06 -32.13 -18.00 3.56 -.52
Step 3 .33 02
English Competency Pressure 1.72 .89 2.55 .41 .31
Self-Compassion -26.07 -33.12 -19.03 3.55 -.54
Interaction .855 .02 1.68 .42 .15
Body Appreciation
Step 1 .01 .02
English Competency Pressure .24 -.03 .52 .14 .15
Step 2 .33 .32
English Competency Pressure .10 -.13 .33 .11 .06
Self-Compassion 7.61 5.70 9.51 .96 .57
Step 3 .37 .03
English Competency Pressure .19 -.04 .42 .11 .12
Self-Compassion 7.87 6.01 9.74 .94 .58
Interaction -.31 -.54 -.09 .11 -.20

Table 4
Model 6. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Bicultural Self-Consciousness

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Depressive Symptoms
Step 1 .03 .04
Bicultural Self-Consciousness .842 .106 1.57 .372 .20
Step 2 .18 .16
Bicultural Self-Consciousness 1.097 .414 1.78 .345 .26
Self-Compassion -4.181 -5.859 -2.50 .848 -.40
Step 3 . .24 .06
Bicultural Self-Consciousness .920 .254 1.58 .337 .21
Self-Compassion -4.897 -6.571 -3.22 .845 -.47
Interaction .996 .391 1.60 .306 .26

58
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Table 5
Model 7. Hierarchical Linear Regression Results for Pressure to Acculturate

95% CI
Variable B Lower Upper SE Β R2 ΔR2
Depressive Symptoms
Step 1 .02 .02
Pressure to Acculturate .39 -.01 .81 .21 .16
Step 2 .14 .13
Pressure to Acculturate .43 .04 .82 .19 .18
Self-Compassion -3.79 -5.51 -2.08 .86 -.36
Step 3 . 18 .04
Pressure to Acculturate .44 .06 .82 .19 .19 .
Self-Compassion -4.08 -5.78 -2.39 .85 -.39 .
Interaction .55 .14 .96 .20 .21

59
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix C

Study Information Sheet

What is this project studying?


The main purpose of this study is to learn about your values, behaviors, and mental well-
being.

What would I do if I participate?


This study should take you approximately 60 minutes (1 credit) to complete. You will be
asked to complete several questionnaires, describing yourself, your opinions, behaviors, and
experiences.

Can I quit if I become uncomfortable?


Yes. You can stop your participation at any time without penalty. You may skip any
questions you do not wish to answer.

How are you protecting privacy?


We are not asking for any identifying information on the survey. Your information will be
anonymous meaning your identity will not be linked to your responses.

How will I benefit from participating?


You will receive 1 credit for your PSY 1300 class.

Important point
Please note that as you click “next” at the bottom of each survey page, your responses to that
page are saved and you cannot go back and change them.

I have some questions about this study. Who can I ask?


The study is being run by Mandrila Das (mandrila.das@ttu.edu) and Dr. Steven Richards
(steven.richards@ttu.edu). They will answer any questions you have about the study. Texas
Tech University also has a board that protects the rights of people who participate in
research. You can ask them questions at 806-742-2064. You can also mail your questions to
the Human Research Protection Program, Office of the Vice President for Research, Texas
Tech University, Lubbock Texas 79409.

Who can participate?


Any Texas Tech student between ages 18-25 who identifies as a Latina/Hispanic woman.

Do you wish to participate?


If you do not wish to participate, please close your browser window.
If you do wish to participate, please click “Next” to continue.

60
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix D

Demographics

For each of the following items, please select the response option that best describes you.

What is your current age, in years?


__ 17 years old or younger
__ 18-25 years old, please enter age below
___
__ 26 years old or older

With which gender do you most identify?


__ Man
__ Woman
__ Transgender Woman
__ Transgender Man
__ Non-binary/Gender Queer
__ Other, please describe _____

With which race/ethnicity do you most identify (check all that apply)?
__ Asian/Pacific Islander
__ Black/Black
__ White/White (non-Latina/o)
__ Latino(a)/Hispanic
__ Native American/American Indian
__ Middle Eastern/Asian Indian
__ Biracial/Multicultural
__ Other, please describe _____

Please select the statement that best describes you.


__You were born in another country
a) What age did you immigrate to the U.S.? _
__You were born in the U.S. but one of your parents was
born in another country.
__ Both you and your parents were born in the U.S. but all
your grandparents were born in another country.
__ Both you and your parents were born in the U.S. and at
least one grandparent was born in the U.S.
__ You, your parents, and all your grandparents were born
in U.S.

61
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix E

Eating Attitudes Test – 26 (EAT-26)

Instructions: Please fill out the below from as accurately, honestly, and completely as
possible. There are no right or wrong answers. All your responses are confidential.
Part A: Complete the following questions:
1) Birth Date Month: Day: Year:

2) Height: Feet: Inches:

3) Current Weight (lbs.):

4) Highest Weight (excluding pregnancy):

5) Lowest Adult Weight:

6) Ideal Weight:

Part B: Check a response for each of the following statements:


1. Am terrified about being overweight. Always Usually Often Sometimes
Rarely Never

2. Avoid eating when I am hungry. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely


Never

3. Find myself preoccupied with food. Always Usually Often Sometimes


Rarely Never

4. Have gone on eating binges where I feel


that I may not be able to stop. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

5. Cut my food into small pieces. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

6. Aware of the calorie content of foods


that I eat. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

7. Particularly avoid food with a high carbohydrate


content (i.e. bread, rice, potatoes, etc.) Always Usually Often Sometimes
Rarely Never

62
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

8. Feel that others would prefer if I ate more. Always Usually Often Sometimes
Rarely Never

9. Vomit after I have eaten. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely


Never

10. Feel extremely guilty after eating. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

11. Am preoccupied with a desire to be


thinner. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

12. Think about burning up calories when I


exercise. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

13. Other people think that I am too thin. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

14. Am preoccupied with the thought of


having fat on my body. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

15. Take longer than others to eat my


meals. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

16. Avoid foods with sugar in them. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

17. Eat diet foods. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely


Never

18. Feel that food controls my life. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

19. Display self-control around food. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

20. Feel that others pressure me to eat. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

21. Give too much time and thought to food.Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

63
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

22. Feel uncomfortable after eating sweets. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

23. Engage in dieting behavior. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely Never

24. Like my stomach to be empty. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely


Never

25. Have the impulse to vomit after meals. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely
Never

26. Enjoy trying new rich foods. Always Usually Often Sometimes Rarely Never

Part C: Behavioral Questions (In the past 6 months have you):


A. Gone on eating binges where you feel that you may not be able to stop (defined as eating
much more than most people would under the same circumstances and feeling that eating is
out of control)?
Never Once a month 2-3 times Once a week 2-6 times Once a day
or less per month per week or more

B. Ever made yourself sick (vomited) to control your weight or shape?


Never Once a month 2-3 times Once a week 2-6 times Once a day
or less per month per week or more

C. Ever used laxatives, diet pills or diuretics (water pills) to control your weight or shape?
Never Once a month 2-3 times Once a week 2-6 times Once a day
or less per month per week or more

D. Exercised more than 60 minutes a day to lose or to control your weight?


Never Once a month 2-3 times Once a week 2-6 times Once a day
or less per month per week or more

E. Lost 20 pounds or more in the past 6 months?


Yes No

64
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix F

Body Shape Questionnaire-34 (BSQ-34)

We should like to know how you have been feeling about your appearance over the PAST
FOUR WEEKS. Please read each question and circle the appropriate number to the right.
Please answer all the questions.

OVER THE PAST FOUR WEEKS:


Never
| Rarely
| | Sometimes
| | | Often
| | | | Very often
| | | | | Alway
s
| | | | | |
1. Has feeling bored made you brood about your 1 2 3 4 5 6
shape?...........................

2. Have you been so worried about your shape that you have been
feeling you ought to 1 2 3 4 5 6
diet?....................................................................................

3. Have you thought that your thighs, hips or bottom are too large
for the rest of 1 2 3 4 5 6
you?..............................................................................................

4. Have you been afraid that you might become fat (or 1 2 3 4 5 6
fatter)?..................

5. Have you worried about your flesh being not firm 1 2 3 4 5 6


enough?...................

6. Has feeling full (e.g. after eating a large meal) made you feel 1 2 3 4 5 6
fat?.........

7. Have you felt so bad about your shape that you have 1 2 3 4 5 6
cried?..................

8. Have you avoided running because your flesh might 1 2 3 4 5 6


wobble?...............

9. Has being with thin women made you feel self-conscious about
your 1 2 3 4 5 6
shape?..............................................................................................
........

65
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

10. Have you worried about your thighs spreading out when sitting 1 2 3 4 5 6
down?

11. Has eating even a small amount of food made you feel 1 2 3 4 5 6
fat?...................

12. Have you noticed the shape of other women and felt that your
own shape compared 1 2 3 4 5 6
unfavourably?...............................................................

13. Has thinking about your shape interfered with your ability to
concentrate (e.g. while watching television, reading, listening to
conversations)?................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 6
........

14. Has being naked, such as when taking a bath, made you feel 1 2 3 4 5 6
fat?..........

15. Have you avoided wearing clothes which make you particularly
aware of the shape of your 1 2 3 4 5 6
body?......................................................................

16. Have you imagined cutting off fleshy areas of your 1 2 3 4 5 6


body?....................

Never
| Rarely
| | Sometimes
| | | Often
| | | | Very often
| | | | | Always
| | | | | |
17. Has eating sweets, cakes, or other high calorie food made you 1 2 3 4 5 6
feel fat?

18. Have you not gone out to social occasions (e.g. parties) because
you have felt bad about your 1 2 3 4 5 6
shape?..............................................................

19. Have you felt excessively large and 1 2 3 4 5 6


rounded?........................................

20. Have you felt ashamed of your 1 2 3 4 5 6


body?.....................................................

21. Has worry about your shape made you 1 2 3 4 5 6


diet?..........................................

66
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

22. Have you felt happiest about your shape when your stomach has
been empty (e.g. in the 1 2 3 4 5 6
morning)?...................................................................

23. Have you thought that you are in the shape you are because you
lack self- 1 2 3 4 5 6
control?............................................................................................
.

24. Have you worried about other people seeing rolls of fat around
your waist or 1 2 3 4 5 6
stomach?....................................................................................

25. Have you felt that it is not fair that other women are thinner than 1 2 3 4 5 6
you?.

26. Have you vomited in order to feel 1 2 3 4 5 6


thinner?.............................................

27. When in company have your worried about taking up too much
room (e.g. sitting on a sofa, or a bus 1 2 3 4 5 6
seat)?......................................................

28. Have you worried about your flesh being 1 2 3 4 5 6


dimply?.................................

29. Has seeing your reflection (e.g. in a mirror or shop window)


made you feel bad about your 1 2 3 4 5 6
shape?......................................................................

30. Have you pinched areas of your body to see how much fat there 1 2 3 4 5 6
is?.....

31. Have you avoided situations where people could see your body
(e.g. communal changing rooms or swimming 1 2 3 4 5 6
baths)?...................................

32. Have you taken laxatives in order to feel 1 2 3 4 5 6


thinner?..................................

33. Have you been particularly self-conscious about your shape


when in the company of other 1 2 3 4 5 6
people?.................................................................

34. Has worry about your shape made you feel you ought to 1 2 3 4 5 6
exercise?.......

67
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix G

Body Appreciation Scale (BAS)

Directions for participants: For each item, please circle the number that best characterizes your attitudes or
behaviors.

Never Seldom Sometimes Often Always


1 2 3 4 5

1. I respect my body.

2. I feel good about my body.

3. On the whole, I am satisfied with my body

4. Despite its flaws, I accept my body for what it is.

5. I feel that my body has at least some good qualities.

6. I take a positive attitude towards my body.

7. I am attentive to my body’s needs.

8. My self-worth is independent of my body shape or weight.

9. I do not focus a lot of energy being concerned with my body shape or weight.

10. My feelings toward my body are positive, for the most part.

11. I engage in healthy behaviors to take care of my body.

12. I do not allow unrealistically thin images of women presented in the media to affect my

attitudes toward my body.

13. Despite its imperfections, I still like my body.

68
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix H

Compulsive Exercise Test (CET)

Instructions Listed below are a series of statements regarding exercise. Please read each
statement carefully and circle the number that best indicates how true each statement is of
you. Please answer all the questions as honestly as you can.

Never true Rarely true Sometimes true Often true Usually true Always true

1) I feel happier and/or more positive after I exercise.


2) I exercise to improve my appearance.
3) I like my days to be organised and structured of which exercise is just one part.
4) I feel less anxious after I exercise.
5) I find exercise a chore.
6) If I feel I have eaten too much, I will do more exercise.
7) My weekly pattern of exercise is repetitive.
8) I do not exercise to be slim.
9) If I cannot exercise I feel low or depressed.
10) I feel extremely guilty if I miss an exercise session.
11) I usually continue to exercise despite injury or illness, unless I am very ill or too injured.
12) I enjoy exercising.
13) I exercise to burn calories and lose weight.
14) I feel less stressed and/or tense after I exercise.
15) If I miss an exercise session, I will try and make up for it when I next exercise.
16) If I cannot exercise I feel agitated and/or irritable.
17) Exercise improves my mood.
18) If I cannot exercise, I worry that I will gain weight.
19) I follow a set routine for my exercise sessions e.g. walk or run the same route, particular
exercises, same amount of time, and so on.
20) If I cannot exercise I feel angry and/or frustrated.
21) I do not enjoy exercising.
22) I feel like I’ve let myself down if I miss an exercise session.
23) If I cannot exercise I feel anxious.
24) I feel less depressed or low after I exercise.

69
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix I

The Exercise Motivations Inventory – 2 (EMI-2)

On the following pages are a number of statements concerning the reasons people often give
when asked why they exercise. Whether you currently exercise regularly or not, please read
each statement carefully and indicate, by circling the appropriate number, whether or not
each statement is true for you personally, or would be true for you personally if you did
exercise. If you do not consider a statement to be true for you at all, circle the ‘0’. If you
think that a statement is very true for you indeed, circle the ‘5’. If you think that a statement
is partly true for you, then circle the ‘1’, ‘2’, ‘3’ or ‘4’, according to how strongly you feel
that it reflects why you exercise or might exercise.

Remember, we want to know why you personally choose to exercise or might choose to
exercise, not whether you think the statements are good reasons for anybody to exercise. It
helps us to have basic personal information about those who complete this questionnaire. We
would be grateful for the following information:
Your age ………… years
Your gender …… male/female

Personally, I exercise (or might exercise) …

1. To stay slim
2. To avoid ill-health
3 Because it makes me feel good
4 To help me look younger
5 To show my worth to others
6 To give me space to think
7 To have a healthy body
8 To build up my strength
9 Because I enjoy the feeling of exerting myself
10 To spend time with friends
11 Because my doctor advised me to exercise
12 Because I like trying to win in physical activities
13 To stay/become more agile
14 To give me goals to work towards
15 To lose weight
16 To prevent health problems
17 Because I find exercise invigorating
18 To have a good body
19 To compare my abilities with other peoples’
20 Because it helps to reduce tension
21 Because I want to maintain good health
22 To increase my endurance
23 Because I find exercising satisfying in and of itself
24 To enjoy the social aspects of exercising

70
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

25 To help prevent an illness that runs in my family


26 Because I enjoy competing
27 To maintain flexibility
28 To give me personal challenges to face
29 To help control my weight
30 To avoid heart disease
31 To recharge my batteries
32 To improve my appearance
33 To gain recognition for my accomplishments
34 To help manage stress
35 To feel more healthy
36 To get stronger
37 For enjoyment of the experience of exercising
38 To have fun being active with other people
39 To help recover from an illness/injury
40 Because I enjoy physical competition
41 To stay/become flexible
42 To develop personal skills
43 Because exercise helps me to burn calories
44 To look more attractive
45 To accomplish things that others are incapable of
46 To release tension
47 To develop my muscles
48 Because I feel at my best when exercising
49 To make new friends
50 Because I find physical activities fun, especially when competition is involved
51 To measure myself against personal standards

71
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix J

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R)

Using the scale below, indicate the number which best describes
How often you felt or behaved in this way during the past week:

0 Rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day)


1 Some or a little of the time (1-2 days)
2 Occasionally or a moderate amount of time (3-4 days)
3 Most or all of the time (5-7 days)

1. I was bothered by things that usually don’t bother me.


2. I did not feel like eating, my appetite was poor.
3. I felt that I could not shake the blues, even with help from
my family and friends.
4. I felt that I was just as good as other people.
5. I had trouble keeping my mind on what I was doing.
6. I felt depressed.
7. I felt that everything I did was an effort.
8. I felt hopeful about the future.
9. I thought my life had been a failure.
10. I felt fearful.
11. My sleep was restless.
12. I was happy.
13. I talked less than usual.
14. I felt lonely.
15. People were unfriendly.
16. I enjoyed life.
17. I had crying spells.
18. I felt sad.
19. I felt that people disliked me.
20. I could not get “going.”

72
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix K

The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire 3 (SATAQ – 3)

Please read each of the following items carefully and indicate the number that best reflects
your agreement with the statement.

Definitely Disagree = 1
Mostly Disagree = 2
Neither Agree Nor Disagree = 3
Mostly Agree = 4
Definitely Agree = 5

1. TV programs are an important source of information about fashion and "being


attractive."
2. I've felt pressure from TV or magazines to lose
weight.
3. I do not care if my body looks like the body of people who are on
TV.
4. I compare my body to the bodies of people who are on
TV.
5. TV commercials are an important source of information about fashion and "being
attractive."
6. I do not feel pressure from TV or magazines to look
pretty.
7. I would like my body to look like the models who appear in
magazines.
8. I compare my appearance to the appearance of TV and movie
stars.
9. Music videos on TV are not an important source of information about fashion and
"being attractive."
10. I've felt pressure from TV and magazines to be
thin.
11. I would like my body to look like the people who are in
movies.

73
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

12. I do not compare my body to the bodies of people who appear in


magazines.
13. Magazine articles are not an important source of information about fashion and
"being attractive."
14. I've felt pressure from TV or magazines to have a perfect
body.
15. I wish I looked like the models in music
videos.
16. I compare my appearance to the appearance of people in
magazines.
17. Magazine advertisements are an important source of information about fashion and
"being attractive."
18. I've felt pressure from TV or magazines to
diet.
19. I do not wish to look as athletic as the people in
magazines.
20. I compare my body to that of people in "good
shape."
21. Pictures in magazines are an important source of information about fashion and
"being attractive."
22. I've felt pressure from TV or magazines to
exercise.
23. I wish I looked as athletic as sports
stars.
24. I compare my body to that of people who are
athletic.
25. Movies are an important source of information about fashion and "being
attractive."
26. I've felt pressure from TV or magazines to change my
appearance.
27. I do not try to look like the people on
TV.

74
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

28. Movie starts are not an important source of information about fashion and "being
attractive."
29. Famous people are an important source of information about fashion and "being
attractive."
30. I try to look like sports
athletes.

75
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix L

Self-Compassion Scale (SCS – Long Form)

HOW I TYPICALLY ACT TOWARDS MYSELF IN DIFFICULT TIMES

Please read each statement carefully before answering. To the left of each item, indicate how
often you behave in the stated manner, using the following scale:

Almost never Almost always

1 2 3 4 5

1. I’m disapproving and judgmental about my own flaws and inadequacies.


2. When I’m feeling down I tend to obsess and fixate on everything that’s wrong.
3. When things are going badly for me, I see the difficulties as part of life that everyone
goes through.
4. When I think about my inadequacies, it tends to make me feel more separate and cut off
from the rest of the world.
5. I try to be loving towards myself when I’m feeling emotional pain.
6. When I fail at something important to me I become consumed by feelings of inadequacy.
7. When I'm down and out, I remind myself that there are lots of other people in the world
feeling like I am.
8. When times are really difficult, I tend to be tough on myself.
9. When something upsets me I try to keep my emotions in balance.
10. When I feel inadequate in some way, I try to remind myself that feelings of
inadequacy are shared by most people.
11. I’m intolerant and impatient towards those aspects of my personality I don't like.
12. When I’m going through a very hard time, I give myself the caring and tenderness I
need.
13. When I’m feeling down, I tend to feel like most other people are probably happier
than I am.
14. When something painful happens I try to take a balanced view of the situation. 15. I try to
see my failings as part of the human condition.
16. When I see aspects of myself that I don’t like, I get down on myself.
17. When I fail at something important to me I try to keep things in perspective.
18. When I’m really struggling, I tend to feel like other people must be having an easier time
of it.
19. I’m kind to myself when I’m experiencing suffering.
20. When something upsets me I get carried away with my feelings.
21. I can be a bit cold-hearted towards myself when I'm experiencing suffering.
22. When I'm feeling down I try to approach my feelings with curiosity and openness.
23. I’m tolerant of my own flaws and inadequacies.
24. When something painful happens I tend to blow the incident out of proportion.
25. When I fail at something that's important to me, I tend to feel alone in my failure.
26. I try to be understanding and patient towards those aspects of my personality I don't like.

76
Texas Tech University, Mandrila Das, August 2020

Appendix M

The Multidimensional Acculturative Stress Inventory (Rodriguez, 2002; 2015)

Below is a list of situations that as a Latino/Hispanic you may have experienced. Read each
item carefully and determine if it has occurred in the PAST 3 MONTHS. If so, please rate
how stressful that event was based on the provided scale. If not, please click on the "0" in the
options provided.

1. I have a hard time understanding others when they speak English.


2. I have a hard time understanding others when they speak
Spanish.
3. I feel pressure to learn Spanish.
4. It bothers me that I speak English with an accent.
5. It bothers me that I speak Spanish with an accent.
6. Since I don’t speak English well, people have treated me rudely
or unfairly.
7. I have been discriminated against because I have difficulty
speaking English.
8. I don’t speak English or don’t speak it well.
9. I don’t speak Spanish or don’t speak it well.
10. I feel pressure to learn English.
11. I feel uncomfortable being around people who only speak
English.
12. I feel uncomfortable being around people who only speak
Spanish.
13. It bothers me when people assume that I speak English.
14. It bothers me when people assume that I speak Spanish.
15. Since I don’t speak Spanish well, people have treated me
rudely or unfairly.
16. I have been discriminated against because I have difficulty
speaking Spanish.
17. It bothers me when people pressure me to assimilate to the
American ways of doing things.
18. It bothers me when people don’t respect my Latino values (e.g.,
family).
19. It bothers me when people don’t respect my American values
(e.g., independence).
20. I am self-conscious about my Latino background.
21. I am self-conscious about my American background.
22. Because of my cultural background, I have a hard time fitting in
with Americans.
23. Because of my cultural background, I have a hard time fitting in
with Latinos.
24. Because of my cultural background, I have a hard time fitting in
with Whites.

77

You might also like