Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BE Development
BE Development
BE Development
2553
The Journal of KMUTNB., Vol. 20, No. 2, May. - Aug. 2010
Keeratikan Piriyakul1
363
วารสารวิชาการพระจอมเกล้าพระนครเหนือ ปีที่ 20 ฉบับที่ 2 พ.ค. - ส.ค. 2553
The Journal of KMUTNB., Vol. 20, No. 2, May. - Aug. 2010
364
วารสารวิชาการพระจอมเกล้าพระนครเหนือ ปีที่ 20 ฉบับที่ 2 พ.ค. - ส.ค. 2553
The Journal of KMUTNB., Vol. 20, No. 2, May. - Aug. 2010
365
วารสารวิชาการพระจอมเกล้าพระนครเหนือ ปีที่ 20 ฉบับที่ 2 พ.ค. - ส.ค. 2553
The Journal of KMUTNB., Vol. 20, No. 2, May. - Aug. 2010
Figure 6 Calibration of bender element with a Figure 7 Calibration of bender element with a
single period sinusoidal waveform. four period sinusoidal waveform.
the arrival of the shear wave when the distance apparatus is set up without a specimen inside. The
between the transmitter and the receiver is in the bender elements are placed at the suitable height and
range of ¼-4 wavelengths. Figure 5 shows that the distance by clamping. No shear wave arrival should
near-field effect decays fast when the number of be recorded when the triaxial apparatus is empty or
wavelengths between the transmitter and the when the triaxial cell is filled with water.
receiver increases as described by [2]. In this Figure 6 shows the delay of the shear wave
research, the optimum frequencies giving good often attaching the transmitting transducer directly
signals are between 2 to 10 kHz. The resonant to the receiving transducer and sending a single
frequency of the piezoelectric bender element is period sinusoidal waveform with a frequency of
610 Hz, frequencies lower than 1 kHz should 4 kHz. The offset time, tc, of 7.80 µs is measured. In
therefore not be applied. the similar way, a four period sinusoidal waveform
with frequency of 4 kHz is sent and its delay is
4. Calibration of Bender Elements 3.906 µs as seen in Figure 7.
Before performing the tests, it is essential to
calibrate the complete system. To ensure no delay 5. Example of Experimental Results
time in the measurement due to the electronics, In this research a triaxial apparatus mounted
ceramics and coating material, there are two with piezoelectric bender elements is used for
methods. In the first method, the offset time, tc, is performing the triaxial test under an isotropic stress
estimated by putting a pair of bender element condition. An overconsolidated Boom clay
directly in contact and measuring the time interval specimen is installed into the triaxial apparatus. The
between the transmitter transducer and the receiver cylindrical clay specimen has a diameter of 37.8
transducer. In the second method, the triaxial mm and height of 87.8 mm. The specific gravity of
366
วารสารวิชาการพระจอมเกล้าพระนครเหนือ ปีที่ 20 ฉบับที่ 2 พ.ค. - ส.ค. 2553
The Journal of KMUTNB., Vol. 20, No. 2, May. - Aug. 2010
367
วารสารวิชาการพระจอมเกล้าพระนครเหนือ ปีที่ 20 ฉบับที่ 2 พ.ค. - ส.ค. 2553
The Journal of KMUTNB., Vol. 20, No. 2, May. - Aug. 2010
Table 1 presents the shear wave velocities by evaluate the shear wave velocity and the shear
continuous sinusoidal shear wave measurements on modulus of soils, which are important parameters
a Boom clay sample. The results show that the for civil and earthquake engineering. The shear
interpretation of shear wave arrival time is improved modulus of soils can be accurately obtained using
when the number of wavelengths is higher than four the piezoelectric bender elements. This technique
or five. measures the shear modulus in a very small strain
region where the strain is less than 0.0001 % and
Table 1 V s from continuously sinusoidal shear this region is assumed to be an elastic region for the
wave measurement of a Boom clay soil material. By interpretation of three different
specimen with different frequencies waveforms, there is no significant effect of
No. of wavelengths f (Hz) Vs (m/s) waveforms on the determination of the shear wave
1 2050 172.12 velocity. It is shown that the piezoelectric bender
2 3915 164.22 element test is a good method for determining the
3 6150 172.12 shear wave velocity. Since it is a non intrusive test,
4 9012 189.16
the soil specimen will not be disturbed during the
5 11050 185.55
test, therefore the same soil sample can be used for
Using Equation 3, the shear moduli are other types of soil testing.
calculated for all methods and show good agreement
as shown in Table 2. 7. Acknowledgement
The author is grateful to the fund for the
Table 2 Shear moduli of a Boom clay specimen. general scientific research of the King Mongkut’s
Methods Vs (m/s) G (MPa) University of Technology North Bangkok (KMUTNB).
Single period sinusoidal 185.30 66.92
waveform References
Four period sinusoidal 185.31 66.93 [1] R. Dyvik and C. Madshus, “Laboratory
waveform measurement of Gmax using bender elements,”
Continuously sinusoidal 189.16
69.74 The ASCE Annual Convention, pp. 186-196,
waveform
Detroi, 1985.
[2] E. G. M. Brignoli, M. Gotti, and K. H. Stokoe,
6. Conclusions “Measurement of shear waves in laboratory
Bender element testing is a new technique, specimens by means of piezoelectric
which is applied to the Soil Mechanics Laboratory transducers,” Geotechnical Testing Journal,
of the Department of Civil and Environmental vol.19, pp. 384-397, 1996.
Engineering Technology, College of Industrial [3] J. Blewett, I. Blewett, and P. Woodward,
Technology, King Mongkut’s University North “Measurement of shear wave velocity using
Bangkok. This bender element test is able to phase-sensitive detection techniques,”
368
วารสารวิชาการพระจอมเกล้าพระนครเหนือ ปีที่ 20 ฉบับที่ 2 พ.ค. - ส.ค. 2553
The Journal of KMUTNB., Vol. 20, No. 2, May. - Aug. 2010
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 36, pp. Engineering, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall
934-939, 1999. International Series. Prentice Hall, Upper
[4] T. Boonyatee, “Determination of shear wave Saddle, 1996.
velocity by bender elements using variable- [6] A. K. M. Mohsin and D. W. Airey, “Automating
path length method,” Soils and foundations, Gmax measurement in triaxial tests,” The
vol. 49, pp. 489-494, 2009. Prefailure Deformation Characteristics of
[5] S. L. Kramer, Geotechnical Earthquake Geomaterials, pp. 73-80, Lyon, 2003.
369