Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CivPro Video Lectures
CivPro Video Lectures
• Requisites
o a. Subject matter of the controversy is one of common or general interest to many persons;
o b. The persons are so numerous that it is impracticable to join them all as parties;
o c. The court finds a number of them sufficiently numerous and representative of the class as to
fully protect the interests of all concerned; and
o d. The representative sues or defends for the benefit of all.
• SUITS AGAINST ENTITIES WITHOUT JURIDICAL PERSONALITY When two or more persons not
organized as an entity with juridical personality enter into a transaction, they may be sued under the
name by which they are generally or commonly known.
VENUE
• Real actions shall be commenced and tried in the proper court which has jurisdiction over the area
wherein the real property involved, or a portion thereof is situated.
• All other actions may be commenced and tried, at the plaintiff’s election:
o a. Where the plaintiff or any of the principal plaintiffs resides, or
o b. Where the defendant or any of the principal defendants resides, or
o c. In case of a non-resident defendant, where he may be found.
• Venue of Actions Against Non-Residents
o a. Personal action: where the nonresident defendant may be found, as authorized by Sec. 2, Rule
4, but with an additional alternative venue, i.e., the residence of any of the principal plaintiffs,
pursuant to Secs. 2 and 3, Rule 4. [1 Regalado 121, 2010 Ed.]
o b. Real action: in the proper court which has jurisdiction over the area wherein the real property
involved, or a portion thereof is situated.
• When the Rules on Venue Do Not Apply
o a. Cases where a specific rule or law provides otherwise;
o Parties have validly agreed in writing before the filing of an action on the exclusive venue thereof.
• Effects of Stipulations on Venue: The parties may stipulate on the venue as long as the agreement is:
o a. In writing,
o b. Made before the filing of the action, and
o c. Exclusive as to the venue
• Requirement to be binding: To be binding, the parties must have agreed on the exclusive nature of the
venue of any prospective action between them. The agreement of parties must be restrictive and not
permissive.
o In the absence of qualifying or restrictive words (e.g. “only/solely/exclusively in such court”),
venue stipulation is merely permissive; that is, the stipulated venue is in addition to the venue
provided for in the rules.
PLEADINGS
• The complaint is the pleading alleging the plaintiff’s or claiming party’s cause or causes of action.
• An answer is a pleading in which a defending party sets forth his or her defenses.
o A negative defense is the specific denial of the material fact or facts alleged in the pleading of the
claimant essential to his or her cause or causes of action.
o A negative pregnant is a form of negative expression which carries with it an affirmation or at
least an implication of some kind favorable to the adverse party. It is a denial pregnant with an
admission of the substantial facts alleged in the pleading.
▪ Where a fact is alleged with qualifying or modifying language and the words of the
allegation as so qualified or modified are literally denied, it has been held that the
qualifying circumstances alone are denied while the fact itself is admitted.
• A counterclaim is any claim, which a defending party may have against an opposing party.
o Elements of Compulsory Counterclaim
▪ 1. Arises out of or is necessarily connected with the transaction or occurrence which is the
subject matter of the opposing party’s claim;
▪ 2. It does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties over whom the court
cannot acquire jurisdiction;
▪ 3. The court has jurisdiction over the amount and nature of the case;
▪ 4. It must be cognizable by the regular courts of justice; and
▪ 5. It is already in existence at the time that the defending party files his answer
o Test to Determine Whether a Counterclaim is Compulsory or Permissive
▪ 1. Are the issues of fact or law raised by the claim and the counterclaim largely the same?
▪ 2. Would res judicata bar a subsequent suit on defendant’s claim absent the compulsory
counterclaim rule?
▪ 3. Will substantially the same evidence support or refute plaintiff’s claim as well as the
defendant’s counterclaim? and
▪ 4. Is there any logical relation between the claim and the counterclaim? Affirmative
answers to the above queries indicate the existence of a compulsory counterclaim.
o A permissive counterclaim does not necessarily arise out of or is not directly connected with the
subject matter of the first claim
▪ Effect on counterclaim when complaint is dismissed: The dismissal of the complaint shall
be without prejudice to the prosecution in the same or separate action
• A cross-claim is any claim by one party against a co-party arising out of the transaction or occurrence that
is the subject matter either of the original action or of a counterclaim therein. Such cross- claim may cover
all or part of the original claim.
o Requirements: 1. A claim by one party against a co-party; 2. Must arise out of the transaction or
occurrence that is the subject matter either of the original action or of a counterclaim; and 3. The
cross-claimant is prejudiced by the claim against him by the opposing party
• A claim that a defending party may, with leave of court, file against a person not a party to the action,
called the third (fourth, etc.)—party defendant, for contribution, indemnity, subrogation or any other
relief, in respect of his opponent’s claim.
o A prerequisite to the exercise of such right is that some substantive basis for a third-party claim
be found to exist, whether the basis be one of indemnity, subrogation, contribution or other
substantive right.
o the third (forth, etc.) party complaint shall be denied admission, and the court shall require the
defendant to institute a separate action, where:
▪ 1. the third (fourth, etc.) party defendant cannot be located within 30 calendar days from
the grant of such leave;
▪ 2. matters extraneous to the issue in the principal case are raised; or
▪ 3. the effect would be to introduce a new and separate controversy into the action
• If the purpose of the motion for intervention is to assert a claim against either or all of the original parties,
the pleading shall be called a COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION.
• REPLY – a pleading, the office or function of which is to deny, or allege facts in denial or avoidance of
new matters alleged by way of defense in the answer and thereby join or make issue as to such new
matters.
o If the plaintiff wishes to interpose any claims arising out of the new matters so alleged, such claims
shall be set forth in an amended or supplemental complaint
o The plaintiff may file a reply only if the defending party attaches an actionable document to his or
her answer.
▪ An actionable document is a written document that’s the basis of one’s cause of action or
defense.
• Extensions of time to file General Rule: A motion for extension to file any pleading is prohibited and is
considered a mere scrap of paper.
o Exception: A motion for extension of time to file an answer may be allowed if:
▪ For meritorious reasons,
▪ For a period not more than 30 calendar days, and
▪ A party may only avail of 1 motion for extension
• Parts and contents of the pleading
o Caption Sets forth the: 1. Name of the court 2. Title of the action (i.e. the names of the parties and
respective participation) and 3. The docket number, if assigned
o Body – Sets forth the pleading’s designation, the allegations of party's claims or defenses, the
relief prayed for, and its date
o Signature and address Every pleading and other written submissions to the court must be signed
by the party or counsel representing him or her.
▪ The signature of counsel constitutes a certificate that he or she has read the pleading and
document and that such pleading or document:
• Is not being presented for any improper purpose to harass, delay, or increase cost
of litigation
• Has claims, defenses, and other legal contentions that are warranted by law or
jurisprudence, and not merely based on frivolous arguments contrary to
jurisprudence
• Has factual contentions that have evidentiary basis or will most likely be supported
by evidence after availment of modes of discovery, and
• The denials of facts are based on evidence or based on belief of lack of information
if specially so identified.
• Verification General Rule: A pleading required to be verified that contains a verification based on
"information and belief", or upon "knowledge, information and belief", or lacks a proper verification,
shall be treated as an unsigned pleading.
• CERTIFICATION AGAINST FORUM SHOPPING is executed by the PLAINTIFF or the PRINCIPAL
PARTY under oath and must be signed by the party himself/herself and not merely by his attorney
o The Certification Against Forum Shopping is a Sworn Statement Certifying to the Following
Matters:
▪ 1. That the party has not commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same
issues in any court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of his/her knowledge,
no such other action or claim is pending therein;
▪ 2. That if there is such other pending action or claim, a complete statement of the present
status thereof; and
▪ 3. That if he/she should thereafter learn that the same or similar action or claim has been
filed or is pending, he/she shall report that fact within 5 days therefrom to the court
wherein his/her complaint or initiatory pleading was been filed.
o Effect of noncompliant CNFS: Failure to comply with the requirements is not curable by mere
amendment of the complaint or other initiatory pleading Cause for dismissal of the case, without
prejudice, unless otherwise provided, upon motion and after hearing.
• Manner of Making Allegations Every pleading shall contain in a methodical and logical form:
o a plain, concise and direct statement of the ultimate facts,
o the evidence on which the party pleading relies for his or her claim or defense, as the case may be
o If the cause of action or defense is based on law, the pertinent provisions of the law and its
applicability.
• Condition precedent A general averment of the performance or occurrence of all conditions precedent
shall be sufficient.
o Examples of conditions precedent:
▪ 1. A tender of payment is required before making a consignation [Art. 1256, NCC]
▪ 2. Exhaustion of administrative remedies is required in certain cases before resorting to
judicial action [Lopez v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 127139 (1999); Dy v. CA, G.R. No. 121587
(1999)]
▪ 3. Prior resort to barangay conciliation proceedings is necessary in certain cases
• In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake must be stated with
particularity.
o Malice, intent, knowledge or other condition of the mind of a person may be averred generally
Failure to plead
• Defenses and objections, General Rule: Defenses and objections not pleaded in either a motion to
dismiss or in the answer are deemed waived Exceptions: The court shall dismiss the case when it appears
from the pleadings or the evidence on record that:
1. The court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter,
2. There is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause (litis pendentia),
3. The action is barred by a prior judgment (res judicata), or
4. The action is barred by statute of limitations (prescription).
• Compulsory counterclaim and cross-claim General Rule: A compulsory counterclaim, or a cross-
claim, not set up shall be barred. Exceptions:
o Omitted Counterclaim or Cross-claim When a pleader fails to set up a counterclaim or cross-claim
through oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, or when justice requires, he may, by leave
of court, set up the counterclaim or cross-claim by amendment before judgment.
SUMMONS
• The writ by which the defendant is notified of the action brought against him
• Nature and Purpose of Summons in Relation to Actions In Personam, In Rem, and Quasi In Rem
In Personam In Rem and Quasi In Rem
Nature
Confers jurisdiction over the person of the Complying the requirements of fair play or due process. In
defendant in a civil case and to afford the said actions, Philippine courts have jurisdiction to hear and
defendant the opportunity to be heard on the decide the case because they have jurisdiction over the res,
claim brought against him. and jurisdiction over the person of the non-resident
defendant is not essential.
a. Motion for bill of particulars; a. Motion for issuance of an alias a. Motion to dismiss, Exception:
b. Motion to dismiss; summons; ▪ Lack of jurisdiction over the
c. Motion for new trial; b. Motion for extension to file an subject matter,
d. Motion for reconsideration; answer; ▪ Litis pendentia, or
e. Motion for execution c. Motion for postponement; ▪ That the action is barred by res
pending appeal; d. Motion for the issuance of a judicata or
f. Motion to amend after a writ of execution; ▪ The statute of limitations
responsive pleading has been e. Motion for the issuance of an b. Motion to hear affirmative defenses;
filed; alias writ of execution c. Motion for reconsideration of the
g. Motion to cancel statutory f. Motion for the issuance of a court’s action on affirmative defenses;
lien; writ of possession; d. Motion to suspend proceedings
h. Motion for an order to break g. Motion for the issuance of an without a TRO or injunction issued by
in or for a writ of demolition; order directing the sheriff to a higher court;
i. Motion for intervention; execute the final certificate of e. Motion for extension of time to file
j. Motion for judgment on the sale; and pleadings, affidavits, or any other
pleadings; h. Other similar motions papers,
k. Motion for summary ▪ Exception: a motion for extension
judgment; to file an answer as provided by
l. Demurrer to evidence; Sec. 11, Rule 11
m. Motion to declare defendant f. Motion for postponement intended
in default; and for delay, except if it is based on:
n. Other similar motions. Exceptions:
▪ Acts of god,
▪ Force majeure, or
▪ Physical inability of the witness to
appear and testify
DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS
• With prejudice – One that is made by the court after an adjudication of the merits.
a. Bars refiling of the case but Subject to the right of appeal
b. Examples of dismissals with prejudice:
▪ Notice of dismissal filed by a party which provides that it is one with prejudice
▪ Notice of dismissal filed by a plaintiff which does not state that the dismissal is with
prejudice but states a reason that prevents the refiling of the complaint;
▪ Notice of dismissal filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed in a competent court an
action based on or including the same claim (two-dismissal rule)
▪ A dismissal due to the fault of the plaintiff if for no justifying reason the plaintiff either:
fails to appear on a date of the presentation of his evidence in chief; or prosecute his action
upon unreasonable amount of time.
• Without prejudice – dismissal upon motion by plaintiff unless otherwise stated in the notice, except that
a notice operates as an adjudication on the merits when the two-dismissal rule applies
a. A complaint may be dismissed by the plaintiff by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before
service of
▪ The answer, or
▪ A motion for summary judgment.
b. Upon such notice being filed, the court shall issue an order confirming the dismissal.
• Two-dismissal Rule bars the refiling of the action as it operates as an adjudication upon the merits.
Applies when the plaintiff has:
• A twice dismissed action,
• Based on or including the same claim,
• In a court of competent jurisdiction
• Motion to dismiss should be filed when dismissing a complaint after service of an answer or after filing a
motion for summary judgment has been filed as the dismissal is no longer a matter of right. The complaint
may only be dismissed upon the approval of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court
deems proper.
• Dismissal Due to the Fault of Plaintiff:
a. The complaint may be dismissed upon motion of the defendant or upon the court’s own motion
if, for no justifiable cause, the plaintiff:
▪ Fails to appear on the date of the presentation of his evidence in chief on the complaint.
▪ Fails to prosecute his action for an unreasonable length of time;
▪ Fails to comply with the ROC or any court order
b. General Rule: This dismissal shall have the effect of an adjudication upon the merits and is thus
a dismissal with prejudice. Exception: Otherwise declared by the court
c. Effect on counterclaim: Dismissal is without prejudice to the right of the defendant to prosecute
his counterclaim in the same or in a separate action. The dismissal shall be limited to the
complaint and the counterclaim will continue.
PRE-TRIAL
• Pre-trial is a procedural device by which the court is called upon, after the filing of the last pleading, to
compel the parties and their lawyers to appear before it, and negotiate an amicable settlement or
otherwise make a formal settlement and embody in a single document the issues of fact and law involved
in the action, and such other matters as may aid in the prompt disposition in the action.
• Pre-trial is mandatory and should be terminated promptly.
• Purpose of pre-trial is to consider
a. Possibility of an amicable settlement or of a submission to alternative modes of dispute resolution
1. Simplification of the issues
2. Possibility of obtaining stipulations or admissions of facts and of documents to avoid
unnecessary proof
3. Limitation of the number and identification of witnesses and the setting of trial dates
4. Advisability of a preliminary reference of issues to a commissioner
5. Propriety of rendering judgment on the pleadings, or summary judgment, or of dismissing
the action should a valid ground therefore be found to exist
6. The requirement for the parties to:
a. Mark their evidence if not yet marked in the judicial affidavits of their witnesses,
Note: The Judicial Affidavit Rule requires that documentary or object evidence
must be marked and attached to the judicial affidavits, with such evidence being
marked as Exhibit A, B, C for the plaintiff, and Exhibit 1, 2, 3 for the defendant.
[Sec. 2(a)(2), AM No. 12-8-8-SC]
b. Examine and make comparisons of the adverse parties’ evidence vis-a-vis the
copies to be marked,
c. Manifest for the record, stipulations regarding the faithfulness of the
reproductions and the genuineness and due execution of the adverse parties’
evidence,
d. Reserve evidence not available at the pre-trial, but only in the following manner,
or else it shall not be allowed
i. Testimonial evidence: by giving the name or position and the nature of
the proposed witness
ii. Documentary/Object evidence: by giving a particular description of the
evidence
7. Such other matters as may aid in the prompt disposition of the action
• Notice of Pre-Trial: After the last responsive pleading has been served and filed, the branch clerk of court
shall issue a notice of pre-trial within 5 calendar days from filing.
• When pre-trial conducted: The notice of pre-trial shall set pre-trial to be conducted not later than 60
calendar days from the filing of the last responsive pleading.
• The notice of pre-trial shall include the dates set for:
o Pre-trial;
o Court-Annexed Mediation (CAM); and
o Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR), if necessary
• Failure to appear: non-appearance at any of the three foregoing setting shall be deemed non-appearance
at the pre-trial, and shall merit the same sanctions as failure to appear at pre-trial.
Plaintiff and counsel Defendant and counsel
Dismissal of the action with prejudice The plaintiff shall be allowed to present evidence ex parte
unless otherwise ordered by the court. within 10 calendar days from termination of pre-trial, and
judgment shall be rendered based on the evidence offered.
INTERVENTION
• Intervention is a remedy by which a third party not originally impleded in the proceedings becomes a
litigant therein to enable him or to her to protect or preserve a right or interest which may be affected by
such proceedings.
• Not a matter of right
• Requisites for Intervention
a. A motion for leave to intervene filed at any time before rendition of judgment by the trial court
b. A legal interest:
i. In the matter in litigation;
ii. In the success of either of the parties;
iii. An interest against both; or
iv. So situated as to be adversely affected by a distribution or other disposition of property in
the custody of the court or of an officer thereof
c. Intervention will not unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of rights of the original parties
d. Intervenor’s rights may not be fully protected in a separate proceeding.
• Time to Intervene: The motion to intervene may be filed at any time before rendition of judgment by the
trial court
• Remedies: If denied – appeal
CALENDAR OF CASES
• The clerk of court, under the direct supervision of the judge, shall keep a calendar of cases for:
o 1. Pre-trial;
o 2. Trial;
o 3. Those whose trials were adjourned or postponed; and
o 4. Those with motions to set for hearing
• Preference shall be given to:
o 1. Habeas corpus cases;
o 2. Election cases;
o 3. Special civil actions; and
o 4. Others required by law
• Assignment of cases to different branches of a court is done exclusively by raffle in open session with
adequate notice given so as to afford interested parties the opportunity to be present
SUBPOENA
• Subpoena Duces Tecum – A process directed to a person requiring him to bring with him books,
documents, or other things under his control
o May be quashed on the following grounds
i. Subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive, or
ii. Relevancy of the books, documents or things does not appear, or
iii. Person in whose behalf the subpoena is issued fails to advance the reasonable cost of the
production thereof
iv. Witness fees and kilometrage allowed by these Rules were not tendered when the
subpoena was served.
• Subpoena Ad Testificandum – A process directed to a person requiring him to attend and to testify at the
hearing or the trial of an action, or at any investigation conducted by competent authority or for the taking
of his deposition
o The court may quash a subpoena ad testificandum on the ground that the witness is not bound
thereby. In either case, the subpoena may be quashed on the ground that the witness fees and
kilometrage allowed by these Rules were not tendered when the subpoena was served.
• Service of a subpoena shall be made in the same manner as personal or substituted service of summons.
The original shall be exhibited and a copy thereof delivered to the person on whom it is served. The service
must be made so as to allow the witness a reasonable time for preparation and travel to the place of
attendance.
• Effect of failure by any person without adequate cause to obey a subpoena served upon him or her:
o Contempt of court who issued the subpoena, or
o Punishment in accordance with the applicable law or rule if the subpoena was not issued by a
court.
• The court which issued the subpoena may issue a warrant to the sheriff or his or her deputy to arrest the
witness and to bring him or her before the court or officer where his or her attendance is required, upon
o Proof of service, and
o Failure of witness to attend.
• The cost of such warrant and seizure of such witness shall be paid by the witness if the court issuing it
shall determine that his or her failure to answer the subpoena was willful and without just excuse.
• Provisions regarding the compelling of attendance and contempt shall not apply to a:
o Witness who resides more than 100 km from his or her residence to the place where he or she is
to testify by the ordinary course of travel; or
o Detention prisoner if no permission of the court in which his or her case is pending was obtained.
• Viatory Right – The right not to be compelled to attend upon a subpoena by reason of the distance from
the residence of the witness to the place where he is to testify is sometimes called the viatory right of a
witness
COMPUTATION OF TIME
• The day of the act/event from which the designated period begins to run is the excluded and the date of
performance included.
o If the last day of the period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday in the place where the
court sits, the time shall not run until the next working day.
• Effect of interruption: The day of the act that caused the interruption, shall be excluded in the
computation of the period.
MODES OF DISCOVERY
• Modes of Discovery
o Depositions pending actions [Rule 23]
o Depositions before action or pending appeal [Rule 24]
o Interrogatories to parties [Rule 25]
o Admission by adverse party [Rule 26]
o Production or inspection of documents or things [Rule 27]
o Physical and mental examination of persons [Rule 28]
• Deposition is a written testimony of a witness given in the course of judicial proceeding in advance of
the trial or hearing, upon oral examination or in response to a written interrogatories. And where an
opportunity is given for cross-examination.
o Kinds of depositions
▪ Depositions pending action [Rule 23]
▪ Depositions before action or pending appeal
o Depositions pending action: The testimony of any person may be taken upon ex parte motion of
a party.
o Methods: By oral examination, or by written interrogatory.
o The attendance of witnesses may be compelled by the use of subpoena as provided in Rule 21
o Deposition of a person deprived of liberty: The deposition may be taken only by leave of court on
such terms as the court prescribes.
o Uses of deposition:
▪ Contradicting or impeaching the testimony of deponent as a witness;
▪ For any purpose for which the deponent is the adverse party;
▪ Any purpose if the court finds that:
• Witness is dead, or
• Witness resides more than 100 km from the place of trial or hearing, or is out of
the Philippines, unless it appears that his absence was procured by the party
offering the deposition, or
• Witness is unable to attend or testify because of age, sickness, infirmity, or
imprisonment, or
• Party offering the deposition has been unable to procure the attendance of the
witness by subpoena.
o Scope of examination: 1. Not privileged, and 2. Relevant to the subject of the pending action
o Effect of using deposition, General Rule: The introduction in evidence of the deposition or any
part thereof for any purpose makes the deponent the witness of the party introducing the
deposition.
▪ Exceptions: 1. The deposition is used to contradict or impeach the deponent.
▪ 2. The deposition of a party or of any one who at the time of taking the deposition was an
officer, director, or managing agent of a public or private corporation, partnership, or
association which is a party may be used by an adverse party for any purpose.
o When May Objections to Admissibility Be Made: objection may be made at the trial or hearing to
receiving in evidence any deposition or part thereof for any reason which would require the
exclusion of the evidence if the witness were then present and testifying
o When the court/RTC of the place where the deposition is being taken may order the termination
or the scope of the deposition limited
▪ At any time during the taking of the deposition,
▪ on motion or petition of any party or of the deponent,
▪ upon a showing that the examination is being conducted in bad faith or in such manner,
as unreasonably to annoy, embarrass, or oppress the deponent or party.
• Interrogatories, Purpose: To elicit material and relevant facts from any adverse parties.
o The party served with the interrogatory shall file an answer. If the party served is a public or
private corporation or a partnership or association, by any officer thereof competent to testify in
its behalf.
o The interrogatories shall be answered fully in writing and shall be signed and sworn to by the
person making them
o Service and filing: The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall file and serve
a copy of the answers on the party submitting the interrogatories within 15 calendar days after
service thereof, unless the court, on motion and for good cause shown, extends or shortens the
time.
o If a party or an officer or managing agent of a party fails to serve answers to interrogatories
submitted under Rule 25 after proper service of such interrogatories, the court on motion and
notice, may:
▪ Strike out all or any part of any pleading of the party,
▪ Dismiss the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or
▪ Enter a judgment by default against the party, and
▪ In its discretion, order him to pay reasonable expenses incurred by the other, including
attorney’s fees.
o Effect of Failure to Serve Written Interrogatories, General Rule: A party not served with
written interrogatories may not be compelled by adverse party to:
▪ Give testimony in open court; or
▪ Give a deposition pending appeal unless allowed by the court for good cause shown and to
prevent a failure of justice.
o A request for admission is that which is filed and served by a party to any person for the following
purpose:
▪ To prove the genuineness of any material and relevant document described in and
exhibited with the request, or
▪ To elicit truth of any material and relevant matter of fact set forth in the request.
o Such party must file and serve such statement within a period not less than 15 calendar days after
service thereof,
• Implied Admission by Adverse Party: Each of the matters which an admission is requested shall be
deemed admitted unless the party to whom request is directed files and serves upon the party requesting
admission a sworn statement, either:
▪ Denying specifically the matters of which an admission is requested, or
▪ Setting forth in detail the reasons why he cannot truthfully either admit or deny those
matters
o Effect of Admission: Any admission made by a party pursuant to such request is for the
purpose of the pending action only and shall not constitute an admission by him for any other
purpose nor may the same be used against him in any other proceeding
o Effect of Failure to File and Serve Request for Admission, General Rule: A party who
fails to file and serve a request for admission on the adverse party of material and relevant facts
at issue which are, or ought to be, within the personal knowledge of the latter, shall not be
permitted to present evidence on such facts.
▪ Exception: Allowed by the court for good cause shown and to prevent a failure of justice.
• Production or Inspection of Documents or Things, Purpose This mode of discovery is not only
for the benefit of a party, but also for the court and for it to discover all the relevant and material facts in
connection with the case.
o The court in which an action is pending may order any party to:
▪ Produce and permit the inspection and copying or photographing, by or on behalf of the
moving party, of any designated documents, papers, books, accounts, letters,
photographs, objects or tangible things not privileged, which constitute or contain
evidence material to any matter involved in the action and which are in his possession
custody or control; or
▪ Permit entry upon designated land or other property in his possession or control for the
purpose of inspecting, measuring, surveying, or photographing the property or any
designated relevant object or operation thereon
o Consequences of refusal of a witness to produce documents or for inspection of copying of
photographing
▪ Designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action;
▪ Refuse to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose claims or defenses;
▪ Strike out all any party part of the pleading of the disobedient party;
▪ Dismiss the action or the proceeding;
▪ Render a judgment by default against a disobedient party;
▪ Stay further proceedings until the order is obeyed; and
▪ Order the arrest of the refusing party.
• Physical and Mental Examination of Persons, Purpose – to have a party whose physical or mental
condition is in controversy undergo a physical or mental examination by the physician.
o If the party examined refuses to deliver such report, the court on motion and notice may make an
order requiring delivery on such terms as are just,
o If a physician fails or refuses to make such a report, the court may exclude his or her testimony if
offered at the trial.
• Consequences of Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery
o Upon refusal to answer, the proponent may apply to the court for an order to compel an answer.
o If the application is granted, the court shall
▪ require the refusing party or deponent to answer the question or interrogatory, and
▪ if it also finds that the refusal to answer was without substantial justification, it may
require the refusing party or deponent or the counsel advising the refusal, or both of them,
to pay the proponent the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the
order, including attorney’s fees.
o If the application is denied and the court finds that it was filed without substantial justification,
the court may require the proponent or the counsel advising the filing of the application, or both
of them, to pay to the refusing party or deponent the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred
in opposing the application, including attorney’s fees.
o The refusal may be considered a contempt of that court.
TRIAL
• Trial is the stage in the elementary procedure followed by the trial courts in the conduct of civil cases in
which the parties shall adduce their respective evidence in support of their claims or defenses. (Velarde
v Social Justice)
• The parties have agreed to submit the case for judgment based on the facts agreed upon, a trial need not
be conducted because evidence would no longer be presented. But if the parties agree only as to some
facts in issue, the trial shall be held as to the disputed facts.
• Adjournments and Postponements: A court may adjourn a trial from day to day, and to any stated
time, as the expeditious and convenient transaction of business may require
o However, the court has no power to adjourn a trial for a period longer than 1 month for each
adjournment; nor more than 3 months in all, except when authorized in writing by the Court
Administrator, Supreme Court.
• A motion for postponement should not be filed in the last hour especially when there is no reason why it
could not have been presented earlier.
o Postponements lie in the court’s discretion.
o Requisites of Motion to Postpone Trial
▪ For Illness of Party or Counsel – the Motion to postpone trial based on illness of a party
or counsel may be granted if accompanied by affidavit or sworn certification showing:
• The presence of such party or counsel at the trial is indispensable; and
• That the character of his or her illness is such as to render his non-attendance
excusable
▪ Agreed Statement of Facts – The parties may agree, in writing, upon the facts involved in
the litigation, and submit the case for judgment on the facts agreed upon, without the
introduction of evidence.
• Order of trial General Rule: Trial shall be limited to the issues stated in the pre-trial order and proceed
as follows:
o Plaintiff shall adduce evidence is support of his complaint;
o Defendant shall then adduce evidence in support of his defense, counterclaim, cross-claim or
third-party complaint;
o Third (3rd) party defendant shall adduce evidence in support of his defense, counterclaim, cross-
claim, fourth-party complaint;
o Fourth (4th) party and so on shall adduce evidence of the material facts pleaded by him;
o The parties against whom any counterclaim or cross-claim has been pleaded, shall adduce
evidence in support of their defense, in the order prescribed by the court;
o Parties may then adduce rebutting evidence only, unless the court permits them to adduce
evidence upon their original case;
o Upon admission of the evidence, the case shall be deemed submitted for decision, unless the court
directs the parties to argue or to submit their respective memoranda or any further pleadings. If
several defendants or third-party defendants, and so forth, having separate defenses appear by
different counsel, the court shall determine the relative order of presentation of their evidence
▪ If several defendants or third-party defendants, and so forth, having separate defenses
appear by different counsel, the court shall determine the relative order of presentation of
their evidence
• Reversal of Order: If the defendant relies upon an affirmative defense in his answer, then the order of
the trial may be properly reversed.
• Delegation of Reception of Evidence, General Rule: The judge of the court where the case is pending
shall personally receive the evidence to be adduced by the parties
o Exception: The court may delegate the reception of evidence to its CLERK OF COURT (who is a
member of the bar) in:
▪ Default hearings
▪ Ex parte hearings, or
▪ Cases where parties agree in writing
o The CLERK OF COURT shall have NO power to rule on objections to any question or to the
admission of exhibits. Such power shall remain with the JUDGE who shall resolve such objection
within ten (10) days from the termination of hearing.
• Consolidation and Severance:
o Consolidation is Proper When:
▪ There are actions involving a common question of law or fact; and
▪ The actions are pending before the same court.
o Depends upon the court’s discretion.
o Kinds of consolidation
a. Quasi-consolidation – where all, except one, of several actions are stayed until one is tried,
in which case, the judgment in the one trial is conclusive as to others; not actually
consolidation but referred to as such
b. Actual consolidation – where several actions are combined into one, lose their separate
identity, and become one single action in which judgment is rendered
c. Consolidation for Trial – where several actions are ordered to be tried together, but each
retains its separate character, and requires the entry of separate judgment
o Severance – The court may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, or third-
party complaint, or of any separate issue in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice
DEMURRER TO EVIDENCE
• Demurrer to evidence is a motion to dismiss on the ground of insufficiency of evidence. It is a remedy
available to the defendant to the effect that the evidence produced by the plaintiff is insufficient in point
of law whether to or not to make out a case or sustain an issue. The question in demurrer to evidence is
whether the plaintiff, by his evidence in chief had been able to establish a prima-facie case in its favor.
• Ground: Insufficiency of evidence, that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief
• If the demurrer is denied, the defendant shall have the right to present his evidence.
o The denial of demurrer is not a final order; it is an interlocutory order. Therefore, the remedy is
not to appeal the Order, but to file Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65, if there is grave abuse of
discretion.
• If the demurrer is granted, the case shall be dismissed with prejudice.
o The proper remedy would be to appeal the judgment.
o In civil case, if the demurrer to evidence is granted, the order of dismissal is considered with
prejudice, therefore appealable.
• Waiver of Right to Present Evidence – If, on appeal, the order granting the motion is reversed, the
defendant loses his right to present evidence.
o The appellate court should not remand the case for further proceedings but should render
judgment on the basis of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff.
• Action on Demurrer to Evidence: A demurrer to evidence shall be subject to the provisions of Rule 15
(Motions)
• Difference between Demurrer to Evidence in a Civil Case and Demurrer to Evidence in a Criminal Case
Demurrer to evidence in Civil Case Demurrer to evidence in Criminal
Case
As to the Leave of Court is not required before filing Demurrer is filed with or without leave of
requirement of a demurrer court
leave of court
As to the effect If granted, the order of dismissal is Order of dismissal is not appealable because
of grant appealable of constitutional policy against double
jeopardy
As to the effect If denied, the defendant may proceed to The accused may adduce his evidence only if
of denial present his evidence the demurrer is filed with the leave of court
• Summary judgment procedure is a method for promptly disposing of actions in which there is no
genuine issue as to any material fact.
o Summary Judgment is proper when it appears to the court that
▪ There exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, except as to the amount of damages,
and
▪ The moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
o When the Case Not Fully Adjudicated: If on motion for summary judgment, judgment is not
rendered upon the whole case or for all the reliefs sought and a trial is necessary, the court may:
▪ Ascertain which material facts exist without substantial controversy and the extent to
which the amount of damages and other reliefs is not in controversy by
• Examining the pleadings and evidence before it; and
• Interrogating counsel
▪ Make an order which:
• Specifies which facts ascertained are deemed established, and
• Directs further proceedings as are just
▪ Conduct trial on the controverted facts
o A partial summary judgment is not a final judgment, but merely a pre-trial adjudication that said
issues in the case shall be deemed established for the trial of the case. Not subject to appeal.
• Affidavits and Attachments: Form
o Made on personal knowledge
o Setting forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence
o Showing affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein
o Certified true copies of all papers or parts thereof referenced in the affidavit shall be attached or
served with the affidavit
• Affidavits in bad faith [Sec. 6, Rule 35] – those presented under this Rule which appear to the court at
any time as presented in bad faith or solely for the purpose of delay.
o The court: Shall order the offending party or counsel to pay the other party the amount of
reasonable expenses which the filing of the affidavits caused him to incur; and
o May, after hearing, adjudge the offending party or counsel guilty of contempt.