Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Grading Reporting
Grading Reporting
Grading Reporting
Introduction
Seven things to consider discussing with your students before assessing (Bobowski, 2017):
Explain where the test fits in the bigger picture. Any given test or assessment is just one piece of their
overall progress as students. This one test in this one day is not the sole measure of their potential or
their future. A better understanding of context will help them better understand how it all fits together.
Share how the test results will affect their overall class grade. Often, students are unaware why they are
being tested or why the teachers need the data they are looking for. Is it going to be used for setting
student or class goals, establishing a grade, or for placement purposes? Share this information with your
students before the test so that they will understand clearly what the test score will mean to them.
Pre-empt questions about what their data will look like and who will be seeing it. Depending on the age
of your students, you should consider sharing with them what results you'll be receiving after the test,
what results they as students, will receive and what will be shared with their parents.
Take the fear out of the testing jargon. Words like evaluate, criteria, evidence and scores can be scary for
some students. While they may seem obvious and interchangeable to you as a teacher, it can help
students if you explain these terms to them and set their minds at ease.
Clarify the testing environment. Some students are less familiar than others when it comes to testing and
how testing schedules can interrupt a given week. Providing better clarification can help alleviate student
stress. Let them know if it will be a one-day test or if it will happen over a period of days. Provide
insights into breaks, whether they can use the restrooms and what they should bring with them on testing
days.
Make any transition to computers or tablets easy. If there is a computer lab being used as part of the
testing process, be sure they know where the lab is, how the computer will be used as part of the test and
how to log in.
Provide the dates of the next assessment. When you explain growth over time to students, it helps to
share a basic schedule of how the assessments will be administered. Let them know when the next one
will occur and whether it will be similar to the one they are preparing for.
Functions of Grading and Reporting Systems
Grading and reporting systems have some very important functions in the educative process. Some of
these important functions are enumerated below:
1. Enhancing students' learning through: clarifying instructional objectives for them, showing students'
strengths and weaknesses, providing information on personal-social development, enhancing students'
motivation (e.g., short-tenn goals) and indicating where teaching might be modified. These can be
achieved through day-to-day tests and feedback and integrated periodic tests.
2. Reports to parents/guardians Grading and reporting systems also inform parents and guardians of
students on the progress of their wards. Likewise, grades and reports communicate objectives to
parents, so they can help promote learning and likewise, communicate how well objectives were met,
so parents can better plan.
3. Administrative and guidance uses. The administrative and guidance purposes of grading and reporting
consist in: (l) helping to decide promotion, graduation, honors, athletic eligibility; (2) reporting
achievements to other schools or to employers; and (3) providing input for realistic educational,
vocational and personal counseling.
Standards of Comparison. In relation to standards of comparison, the following questions are asked:
What standard for comparison will you use for grading? Will you compare a student performance to other
students' performance (norm-referenced grading)? Or will you compare student performance with a pre-
determined established standard (criterion-referenced grading)? Or will you compare it to what a student is
able to do (learning potential or self-referenced)?
Aspect of Performance. The second component of a grading system is aspect of performance, i.e., what
aspects of performance must be graded? One group of educators claim only academic performance must be
graded. This academic performance to be graded include quiz and test results (paper-and-pencil tests),
assignments, products and performances to show processes learned. Examples are oral reports, projects,
interviews, portfolios.
Another group of educators asserts that in addition to academic performance, student's motivation, effort
and participation should also be graded. One of the problems in grading student's motivation, effort and
participation, however, is the difficulty in determining the reliability of effort and motivation.
Weighting Different Kinds of Evidence. This refers to how much weight is given to the different
aspects or components of a student’s grade. Let us take a look at the weighing of the different kinds of
evidence in the DepEd grading system issued in DepEd Order 8, s. 2015.
Technical-V'ocational
Core
Academic Track & Livelihood/Sports/
Subjects
Arts and Design Track
Sharing assessment results is an opportunity to tell an important and meaningful story. Your role is to
educate stakeholders about context, background, methods, results of assessment and to involve them in
making sense of the results and identifying possible solutions or next steps. These can be done during
Parents-Teachers Conference.
We all agree that students are key education stakeholders. When they are involved in the assessment
process and in their own learning, the result is an improvement in achievement. An objective, transparent and
respectful assessment feedback to students drives home the points which the students need to work upon.
Giving Feedback to Students and Parents after Assessments
The feedback should help the students/parents become aware of both their areas of strength and areas for
development. It should encourage students/parents to do introspection, help students/parents to draw
inference and reach conclusions.
People are very good at hiding any feeling of hurt and upset. However, beneath the facade lies a
demoralized and de-motivated individual. For example, some students might start thinking "if that is what I
am like, am I really going to get where I want?" or "Is this what they think of me?" Such situation requires
very careful handling of feedback or else it can become the road to frustration.
If the desired level of trust does not exist between the teacher and the student/parent, feedback discussion
becomes very difficult and the purpose of feedback is defeated. If teachers share the outcomes and feedback
with the student/parent without allowing discussion or comment, the feedback session becomes a fiasco.
Where students/parents do not share hopes, aspirations or intrinsically commit to their development actions
no further progress can take place. It helps if the teacher knows the profile of the student/parent beforehand
as it later helps in navigating the feedback discussion appropriately. This results in greater acceptability of
feedback.
Parent-Teacher Conferences. Durham (2006) asserts that "parent-teacher conferences are both a
responsibility and an opportunity." The education of the learner is the primary responsibility of parents. In
this task of educating children, parents are assisted by the school. For the benefit of children then it is best for
teachers and parents to come together to discuss their children's progress. Parent-Teacher Conferences are a
perfect avenue for this purpose.
It has been a practice of schools to set aside a day for Report card distribution which is at the same time
the opportunity for parents and teachers to confer regarding their child's performance. Here are some
reminders for schools/teachers to get the most from parent-teacher conferences:
1. Announce the date for card-giving in advance. Or better still the school Calendar which should be
given at the beginning of the school year must already include the dates for card-giving and parent-
teacher conference/s. Parents are busy and can't just be there at the school's beck and call.
2. Be positive in approach. Start the conference with something positive and maintain the positive
atmosphere. There is always something good in every student. Even if a student has performed poorly,
try to find at least some areas in which the student has performed well.
3. Be objective. While you should be positive, be truthful and honest. Give an accurate picture of a
student's performance in order not to give false hopes to parents.
4. Have a listening ear. Act with empathy. Parents are parents. They will tend to favor their children.
5. Don't project an "omniscient "image. You don't know all the answers to questions. Refer the parents
to the right person. Example, the Physics teacher if the problem is the child's performance in Physics.
6. Practice good communication skills. Communicate criteria for grading. Have a dialogue not a
monologue where the only one talking is you (or only the parent).
7. Don't talk about other students. The focus of the parent-teacher conference should only be the parent's
child. Never compare the child with other students.
8. End with an encouraging note in the same way that you began with a positive note. It is not the end
of the world.
Why Report/Communicate Assessment Results
We document our assessment processes for accountability. So teaching leads to assessing learning;
reporting and communicating assessment results. These assessment results should be communicated clearly
and accurately to learners as well as parents for improved learning.
Sharing assessment results is an opportunity to tell an important and meaningful story. Your role is to
educate stakeholders about context, background, methods, results of assessment and to involve them in
making sense of the results and identifying possible solutions or next steps. This is reporting.
We all agree that students are key education stakeholders. When they are involved in the assessment
process and in their own learning, the result is an improvement in achievement. An objective, transparent and
respectful assessment feedback to students drives home the points which the students need to work upon.