Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment in The Affective Domain
Assessment in The Affective Domain
Introduction
In the Bloom's taxonomy, three domains of learning were identified: cognitive, psychomotor and affective
domains. The cognitive domain includes mental skills (knowledge), the affective domain dwells on growth in feelings
or emotional areas (feelings, emotions, attitude) while the psychomotor domain is concerned with manual or physical
skills (skills). In short, the three domains of learning are KSA, meaning knowledge, skills and attitude.
However, it is important to realize that by tapping the potentials of the affective domain in enhancing learning,
we increase the likelihood of real and authentic learning among our students. Similarly, students may experience
affective roadblocks to learning that can neither be recognized nor solved when using a purely cognitive approach. (p.
59)
Indeed, learning is not only a cognitive process. It is also an emotional process. Research shows that SEL not
only improves achievement by an average of 11 percentile points, but it also increases prosocial behaviors (such as
kindness, sharing, and empathy), improves student attitudes toward school, and reduces depression and stress among
students (Durlak et al ., 2011).
The five key skills of SEL namely: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills and
responsible decision making are in the affective domain and so are the concern of assessment in the affective domain.
The taxonomy in the affective domain contains a large number of objectives in the literature expressed as interest,
attitudes, appreciations, values and emotional sets as or biases. (Krathwohl et al, 1964). The descriptions of each step
in the taxonomy culled from Kratwohl's taxonomy of Affective Domain (1964) are given as follows:
Receiving is being aware of or sensitive to the existence of certain ideas, material, or phenomena and being willing to
tolerate them. Examples include: to differentiate, to accept, to listen (for), to respond to.
Responding is being committed in some small measure to the ideas, materials, or phenomena involved by actively
responding to them. Example are: to comply with, to follow, to commend, to volunteer, to spend leisure time in, to
acclaim.
Valuing is willing to be perceived by others as attaching importance to certain ideas, materials, or phenomena.
Examples include: to increase measured proficiency in, to relinquish, to subsidize, to support, to debate.
Organization is relating the value to those already held and bring it into a harmonious and internally consistent
philosophy. Examples are to discuss, to theorize, to formulate, to balance, to examine.
Characterization by value or value set is to act consistently in accordance with the values he or she has internalized.
Examples include: to revise, to require, to be rated high in the value, to avoid, to resist, to manage, to resolve.
Teachers usually find difficulty in the use of behavioral when they formulate learning outcomes in the affective
domain. Below are examples of verbs or behavioral terms that can be used to state learning competencies in the
affective domain.
McMillan (2007) gives three feasible methods of assessing learning or learner's development in the affective
domain.
Teacher Observation
Teacher observation can be unstructured or structured. It is unstructured when observation is open-ended.
Teacher's observation is not limited to items in a checklist or rating scale. Teacher observation is structured when
he/she is guided in what to observe by a checklist or rating scale. To make teacher observation work in relation to the
assessment of affective learning, the following should be observed:
Determine behaviors to be observed in advance.
Record student's important data such as time, data and place.
If unstructured, record brief descriptions of relevant behavior.
Keep interpretations separate from description.
Record both positive and negative behaviors.
Have as much observation of each student as necessary.
Avoid personal bias. Be objective.
Immediately record the observations.
Apply a simple and efficient procedure.
Student Self-Report
A student self-report can also be derived by way of a student interview or by way of a questionnaire and
survey. Teacher may interview a student on whether the student likes or hates Physics as a subject and why. One
advantage of an interview is teacher can probe into the answers of the student right there and then.
Another means to derive a student self-report is by way of a survey and a questionnaire. These survey and
questionnaire can make use of a constructed-response format like an essay. "Why is Physics my Favorite Subject"
or "Why is Physics my Pet Peeve" may be the title of an essay that teacher asks the student to write about to determine
the student's attitude toward Physics.
Or teacher may get a student self-report by means of a selected-response format by means of assessment tools
such as a checklist, a rating scale (like a Likert Scale) or a semantic differential scale. Below are examples:
Peer Ratings
Another way is to ask the student's peer to rate him/her on affective items where teacher wants to rate the student.
Ideally, teacher's observation of a student's realization of affective learning outcome should coincide with student's
self-report and that of peer rating of the student. Many times, it does not happen, however.