Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Promise of Engagement - Canadian HR Reporter
The Promise of Engagement - Canadian HR Reporter
C A N A D I A N
www.hrreporter.com
DECEMBER 1, 2008
GUEST COMMENTARY
HENRYK KRAJEWSKI
So, whats going on here? Many popular measures of engagement tend to focus on evaluations of workplace elements (job satisfaction, leadership quality and potential predictors or outcomes of engagement) versus assessing the real degree of commitment and belief an employee has regarding the organization and its values. In other words, these traditional measures tend to capture the head, but not the heart. Assessing how one feels when at work (job affect) is superior to assessing more cognitive or logical evaluations (job satisfaction) in the prediction of job performance. Given this data, and the less than overwhelming proof the promise of engagement has been fulfilled, it may be time to examine other, more productive ways of measuring and promoting engagement in organizations.
cept of commitment is much closer to what we have classically thought of as a sense of engagement. It is certainly plausible people can be connected to organizations for a variety of reasons, beyond just feeling aligned with company values and brand images. For example, people can remain with organizations because they have very limited choices available to them. Or they may stay because they feel a form of obligation to support the needs of their friends and colleagues. And, as has been shown by Meyer and colleagues, people can hold varying levels of these aspects of commitment at any one time. In the end, its an individuals profile on these aspects of commitment that predicts whether she will be a top, average or below average performer. We may also want to examine whether measuring engagement is itself a true engagement strategy. Consider this fact: Measuring engagement does not produce engagement. We have seen how measuring engagement can actually decrease engagement scores through the degree of cynicism and survey fatigue that exists in organizations today.
The evidence
Many people point to seminal research in the Journal of Applied Psychology by James Harter, Frank Schmidt and Theodore Hayes (2002) as evidence that engagement surveys do indeed impact profit and productivity. However, what is commonly overlooked when citing this research is that it shows engagement predicts just one per cent of a companys total profit. Thats not exactly the kind of compelling evidence that is going to convince chief executive officers to start lining up at the engagement survey store.
Copyright Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd., December 1, 2008, Toronto, Ontario, (800) 387-5164. Web site: www.hrreporter.com