Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AUTORECOVERED
AUTORECOVERED
INTRODUCTION
Industry Profile
Company Profile
II REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Research Design
Sampling Design
Data Analysis
V Findings
Suggestions
Conclusion
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEXURE
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF TABLES
INTRODUCTION
The project was undergone in CONSERVE SOLUTION for a period of One months.
Theoretical knowledge is insufficient to cope up with the modern functioning of the
companies. So in order to gain practical knowledge, the project was done at CONSERVE
SOLUTION on the topic “A STUDY ON QUALITY OF WORK LIFE”.
Quality in the workplace comes from understanding and then fully meeting, the needs
of all your internal and external customers, now and into the future and doing so with
continual improvement in efficiency and effectiveness.
U - Understanding
A - Action
L - Leadership
T - Team spirit
It was against above background that finally, in the 1970s, the idea of QWL was conceived.
QWL was quite broader in sense and scope than these earlier stray developments mentioned
above. Human values, needs and aspirations were at the heart of the concept of QWL.
The theories of motivation and leadership propounded by the behavioral scientists also served
as seed bed for the development of the concept of QWL. To quote Maslow depicted in his
well-known theory, ‘Need hierarchy theory of motivation’, the complexity of human nature
with regard to needs and their satisfaction. He says that no sooner the lower order needs are
satisfied, people start seeking satisfaction for higher order needs of their need-hierarchy.
Walton lists eights conceptual categories i.e. constituents that together make up the
quality of working life. These are briefly discussed below:
Work Environment:
Compensation and rewards are motivational factors. The best performer is given the rewards,
and this builds the competitions among the employees to work hard and to achieve both
organizational and individual goals. The economic interests of employees drive them to work
and employee satisfaction dependent to some extent on the compensation offered. Pay should
be fixed on the basis of the work done, individual skills, responsibilities undertaken,
performance and accomplishments.
Facilities:
Facilities play major role in actualization of the goals and objectives by satisfying both the
physical and emotional needs of the employees. Facilities include food service,
transportation, security, etc. Many employers have found it beneficial to allow alternate work
arrangements for their employees. This is one me thod to increase employee productivity and
morale. The alternate work arrangements to the employees include flexible working hours,
shorter or no commute, and secure working environment.
Job satisfaction is the favorableness or un-favorableness with which employees view their
work. Job satisfaction is impacted by job design. Jobs that are rich in constructive behavioral
elements such as work autonomy, task variety, identity, work significance and feedback etc.
contribute to employees’ satisfaction.
Employees want stability of employment and do not like to be the victims of whimsical
personal policies and stay at the mercy of employers. Job security is another factor that is of
concern to employees. Permanent employment provides security to the employees and
improves their QWL.
Autonomy of Work:
In autonomous work groups, employees are given the freedom of decision making. Workers
themselves plan, co-ordinate and control work related activities. It also includes different
opportunities for personnel such as independency at work and having the authority to access
the related information for their task.
Adequacy of Resources:
Resources should match with stated objectives; otherwise, workforce will not be competent
to achieve the predefined objectives. This results in employee dissatisfaction and lower
QWL. Adequacy of resources has to do with enough time and equipment, adequate
information and help to complete assignments
Quality of Work Life in an organization is essential for the smooth running and success of its
employees. The work-life balance must be maintained effectively to ensure that all employees
are running at their peak potential and free from stress and strain. The Quality of Work Life
can affect such things as employees’ timings, his or her work output, his or her available
leaves, etc. Quality of Work Life helps the employees to feel secure and like they are being
thought of and cared for by the organization in which they work. An organization’s HR
department assumes responsibility for the effective running of the Quality of Work Life for
their employees. This being the real fact and since there was absenteeism and lack of job
satisfaction among the workers in Tirupur district, the investigator has made an attempt in
this regard and has undertaken the current study to analyze the Quality of Work Life among
workers with special reference to textile industry in Tirupur district – A textile hub and to
offer suitable suggestions for the organization to take necessary steps to improve the Quality
of Work Life among its Workers.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY :
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
To know the overall quality of work life in the organization that is influenced by the
work.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
The aim of this Study is to capture the essence of an individual’s work experience in
the broadest sense.
To Know how the individual is influenced by their direct experience of work and by
the direct and indirect factors that affect this experience.
To Measure the key factors contributing to the well-being, engagement and stress of
the employees
The statement of the problem for quality of work life typically addresses the various
factors affecting employees' satisfaction, well-being, and overall experience within the
workplace. This may include aspects such as job security, work-life balance, compensation
and benefits, organizational culture, career development opportunities, interpersonal
relationships, workload, and job autonomy. The goal is to identify specific areas where
improvements can be made to enhance the overall quality of work life for employees, leading
to greater productivity, engagement, and retention within the organization.
The study may have a limited timeframe for data collection, potentially missing
insights from ongoing quality measures ongoing Quality Cycle
Candidates may be hesitant to express negative opinions, potentially skewing the
results towards a more positive perception of the process.
The time taken for my project study was 45 days to gather opinions from the
employees and the management.
Findings from Conserve Solutions might not be directly applicable to other companies
with different company cultures, industry sectors, or job types
Few respondents were reluctant while answering the questions.
INDUSTRY PROFILE
Industry Segments: The Environmental Services industry can be broadly segmented into
several categories:
Impact and Sustainability: The Environmental Services industry plays a vital role in
achieving a sustainable future. By providing solutions for waste management, pollution
control, and environmental restoration, these companies contribute to a cleaner and
healthier environment.
Challenges and Considerations: Despite the positive impact, the industry faces
challenges:
• This concept focuses on designing products and systems that minimize waste and
maximize resource recovery. Technologies like advanced recycling and waste-
toenergy conversion are gaining traction.
• This technique utilizes microorganisms to break down and remove pollutants from
contaminated soil and water. Bioremediation offers a sustainable alternative to
traditional remediation methods.
• Advancements in sensor technology and data analytics allow for real-time
monitoring of environmental conditions. This data can be used to identify pollution
sources, track environmental changes, and improve the effectiveness of
environmental management strategies.
COMPANY PROFILE
• Infrastructure
• Architecture
Vision
Mission
Key Services
• Piping Engineering
• Structural Engineering
• 3D Modelling Services
• BIM Modelling
• Sustainability
Clients
Organizational Chart:
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Shiney Chib (2012), did research on “Quality of Work life and organizational
performance at work place of a private manufacturing unit Nagpur”, India
through a structured questionnaire containing 31 items related to 6 variables, namely
organizational performance, job satisfaction, QWL, wage policy, company policy and
union policy. The researcher has formulated two models, one is organization
performance depends on QWL, Job satisfaction, wage policy, company policy and
union participation and the other one is QWL which depends on Organization
performance., job satisfaction, wage policy, company policy and union participation.
The collected data were analyzed using simple percentage, regression and correlation
analysis. The study reveals that both the models stand true and QWL had significant
relationship with organizational performance
Daljeet Kaur (2010) did search on, “Aims to gain an insight into current working
life policies and practices of employees in ICICI Bank Ltd” in Chandigarh.
Several notable factors that influence quality of work life are Fair Compensation, Safe
and healthy working environment, adequate performance appraisal, career growth
opportunities, Training and development etc. On the basis of his study he said that
employees of ICICI bank Ltd. in Chandigarh Region were happy with the working
conditions of the Bank. They felt that they were safe and secure in Bank. They felt
that Bank should start their own transport facilities for the staff. However, the
dissatisfaction among them was the less growth opportunities. They were not
provided with extra care like health camps etc. They were not happy with the way
performance appraisal was done and felt that their management was not flexible with
their social responsibilities and hence they were less satisfied with their jobs.
Rochita Ganguly, Mukherjee ( 2010), did research on, “ The study of Nature of
the perceived quality of work life (QWL) of the university employees” , the nature
of their job satisfaction, the nature of association between QWL and Job Satisfaction.
The results indicate that the selected group of university employees perceived
different aspects of their quality of work life as either uncongenial viz. Autonomy, top
management support and worker’s control mainly or they have had a certain amount
of dilemma to comment on a few other aspects such as personal growth opportunities
and work complexity mainly bearing the potential involving a slight trend of negative
opinion.
Shilpa Sankpal, Pushpa Negi and Jeetendra Vashishtha (2010) did research on ,
“organizational role stress of employees of public and private banks”. The study
was conducted in Gwalior city and a sample of 100 bank employees were used for
data collection – 50 each from public and private sector. The data collected was
subjected to analysis through T-test for comparing between the employees of public
and private sector banks. Overall 11 hypotheses were tested. Data was compared on
the basis of inter role distance, role stagnation, role expectation conflict, role erosion,
role overload, role isolation, personal inadequacy, self role distance, role ambiguity
and resource inadequacy. The study has highlighted that there is a significant
difference between the role stress of public and private sector bank employees. It was
found that the private bank employees experienced higher organizational role stress
than their public bank counterparts. Looking at the various aspects of components of
organizational role stress, it was found that there was no difference between the
Public and Private Sector bank employees in certain aspects like role expectation
conflict, role isolation and personal inadequacy and role ambiguity.
Meenakshi Gupta and Vikas Sharma (2009) did search on “Quality of Work Life
– A Study of bank employees in Jammu region” to determine whether and how the
quality of work life affects the satisfaction level of employees of banks. The study
found that among the independent demographic variables, the best predictor was
annual income followed by marital status, sex, education, family size and job
experience. The factor which was ranked as a best factor that was perceived as
satisfactory by the employees was opportunities for personal encouragement.
However factors as participation in decision making and rewards were found to have
a significant impact on employee’s satisfaction. The banking sector should take note
of this and should encourage employees’ participation in decision making and they
should be rewarded for their performance to attain satisfaction.
Patiraj Kumari and Pooja khanna (2007) did research on “The Quality Of
Working Life in relation to Mental Health Of Bank Employees” to investigate the
quality of work life (QWL) in relation to mental health of bank employees. A total
number of 200 bank employees were selected from banks of Haridwar and Dehradun
(Uttaranchal) comprising 150 employees from public and 50 employees from private
sector banks. The result revealed significant positive correlation between QWL and
mental health. Private sector bank employees were found to be more mentally healthy
than the employees of public sector banks.. The study also revealed significant
difference between the mental health of high and low quality of working life groups.
In public sector banks social integration in the work organization and in private sector
banks safe and healthy working condition has the highest contribution towards mental
health.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN :
“A research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data in a
manner that aims to combine relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure”.
Research design is the conceptual structure within which research is conducted; it constitutes
the blueprint for the collection, measurement and analysis of data.
The type of research design used in the project was Descriptive research, because it helps to
describe a particular situation prevailing within a company. Careful design of the descriptive
studies was necessary to ensure the complete interpretation of the situation and to ensure
minimum bias in the collection of data.
SAMPLING DESIGN :
SAMPLE SIZE:
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES:
For the purpose of analysis, the data has been collected from respondents from
Conserve solutions. The samples have been selected on the basis of Convenient Random
Sampling Techniques.
RESEARCH TOOLS:
The instrument used by me for collecting the information is QUESTIONNAIRE
which contained questions covering various aspects related to Quality of Work Life. It
contained open ended questions and close ended questions.
PRIMARY DATA:
Primary data is the data which is collected by researcher himself for the first for the
specific purpose and they original character. Primary data is collected but researcher data is
collected by researcher for the problems that are currently being studied therefore, data
obtained pertains specifically to the current study considerations the sources are:
Questionnaire
Observations
SECONDARY DATA:
The secondary data are those which have already been collected by someone else
and which have already been passed through the statistical processes. Thus such data is not
originally collected rather obtained from published or unpublished sources.
Company’s Website
Magazines & Journals
Internet
Books and newspapers
Data collected from company internal records, company websites etc. The data collected
through questionnaires is analyzed with statistical tools by using SPSS. For effective
presentation and utilization of data tables, diagrams are used in the report.
Percentage analysis.
Chi-Square.
Correlation
Percentage analysis:
One of the simplest methods of analysis is the percentage method. It is one of the
traditional statistical tools. Through the use of percentage, the data are reduced in the
standard form with the base equal to 100, which facilitates comparison.
Chi-Square :
y2 = å (O-E)2
r=
∑ XY
√¿ ¿ ¿
Data collected from company internal records, company websites etc. The data collected
through questionnaires is analyzed with statistical tools by using SPSS. For effective
presentation and utilization of data tables, diagrams are used in the report.
Gender of respondents
Male
Female
Others
Prefer not to
say
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that of the respondents are Male, of the
Respondents are Female.
Table No: 2
Age of respondents
18 – 25
25 – 35
35-45
45 above
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that of the respondents are between , of
the respondents are between , of the respondents are between and of the respondents are
above.
Table No: 3
Single
Married
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that of the respondents are Single and of
the respondents are Married.
Table No: 4
Qualification of Respondents
Qualificatio
No. of respondents Percentage
n
UG
PG
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that of the respondents have done their
UG, of the respondents have done their PG and of the respondents have done their p.
Table No: 5
Designation of Respondents
Supervisory
Managerial
Executive
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 6
Experiance
Less than 1
year
1 – 5 year
5 – 10 years
More than
10 years
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 7
Designation of Respondents
Supervisory
Managerial
Executive
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 8
Nucleus
Nuclear
Joint family
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 9
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Jobs
individually
assigned
Jobs assigned
through
teams
Any other
formats
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 10
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 11
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 12
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 13
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 14
Employer provides adequate facilities and flexibility for me to fit work in around my
family life
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 15
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 16
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 17
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 18
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 19
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 20
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 21
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 22
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 23
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 24
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 25
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 28
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 29
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 30
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 31
Involved in decisions that affect members of the public in my own area of work
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
Table No: 32
Work
No. of respondents Percentage
Environment
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total 50 100
INFERENCE:
CONCLUSION :
The research on Conserve Solutions Quality of Work Life has yielded valuable insights This
assessment provides a snapshot of Respondents Quality of Work Life and the results should
Be seen as offering some information which needs to be interpreted within the Context of
other factors and influencesA large proportion of most peoples‟ lives will be spent at work.
But all too often, we tend to See work as something we just have to put up with, or something
we don‟t expect to enjoy.
Quality of Work Life – Questionnaire
Biographical information :
NAME :
Your Gender
o Male
o Female
Age
o 18 to 25
o 25 to 35
o 35 to 45
o 45 above
Marital Status
o Single
o Married
Qualification
o UG
o PG
o Professional
Designation
o Supervisory
o Managerial
o Executive
Experiance
o Less than 1 year
o 1 – 5 years
o 5 – 10 years
o More than 10 years
Family Structure
o Nucleus
o Nuclear
o Joint Family
To what extent do you agree with the Strongly Strongly
following?
Nature of the working Environment Disagree Neutral Agree
o Jobs Individually Assigned Disagree Agree
Please fill in the appropriate circle.
o Job
1. I have Assigned
a clear through
set of goals andTeams
aims to enable me to do my job
o Any other formats
2. I feel able to voice opinions and influence changes in my area
of work
3. I have the opportunity to use my abilities at work
4. My work load is manageable
5. My employer provides adequate facilities and flexibility for
me to fit work in around my family life
6. My current working hours / patterns suit my personal
circumstances
7. When I have done a good job it is acknowledged by my line
manager
8. There is a harmonious relationship with our colleagues in the
company
9. I am encouraged to develop new skills
10. I am involved in decisions that affect me in my own area of
work
11. My employer provides me with what I need to do my job
effectively
12. My manager actively promotes flexible working hours /
patterns
13. I work in a safe environment
14. I am treated with respect in the company
15. I am satisfied with the career opportunities available for me
Ahere
16. I often feel excessive levels of stress at work
17. I am satisfied with the training I receive in order to perform
my present job
18. Recently, I have been feeling reasonably happy all things
considered
19. The working conditions are satisfactory
20. I am satisfied with the overall quality of my working life